Impact of preoperative risk on metastatic progression and cancer-specific mortality in patients with adverse pathology at radical prostatectomy

Alternate definitions of adverse pathology to predict a very high risk of metastasis in men with intermediate- and low-risk prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

Adverse pathology (AP) is often used as an intermediate end point for long-term outcomes in men with prostate cancer (PCa) who are active surveillance candidates. The association between a commonly used AP definition and long-term outcomes was tested, which identified definitions more strongly linked to a high risk of metastasis.

METHODS

Data were reviewed from the Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital cohort of men undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP) from 1988 to 2020 at nine Veterans Affairs hospitals. Men meeting National Comprehensive Cancer Network low-risk and favorable intermediate-risk criteria were included. Men with and without AP were compared; men with AP were defined as having grade groups 3-5 or pathological stage ≥pT3a or pN1 at RP (definition 1). Sensitivity analyses were performed for six alternative definitions (definitions 2-7) and their association with biochemical recurrence (BCR), metastasis, PCa-specific mortality (PCSM), and castrate-resistant PCa (CRPC).

RESULTS

A total of 2175 men were included: 711 had AP by definition 1. In univariable analyses, all AP definitions were associated with the risk of BCR, metastasis, and PCSM. All but one definition were associated with CRPC. In definitions 1-6, the 10-year event rate for metastasis in those with AP ranged from 3.0% (definition 1) to 7.9% (definition 5). Only in definition 7 was the 10-year event rate for metastasis >10%. However, only 0.5% of patients (11 of 2175) met definition 7.

CONCLUSIONS

AP was statistically associated with relatively worse outcomes. However, in all but the most stringent definitions, met by <1% of patients, the absolute event rate of metastasis in men with AP was low. This challenges the clinical usefulness of AP as an intermediate end point in men with intermediate- to low-risk PCa.

Outcomes of Grade Group 2 and 3 Prostate Cancer on Initial Versus Confirmatory Biopsy: Implications for Active Surveillance

BACKGROUND

Active surveillance (AS) is recommended as the preferred treatment for men with low-risk disease. In order to optimize risk stratification and exclude undiagnosed higher-grade disease, most AS protocols recommend a confirmatory biopsy.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to compare outcomes among men with grade group (GG) 2/3 prostate cancer on initial biopsy with those among men whose disease was initially GG1 but was upgraded to GG2/3 on confirmatory biopsy.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

We reviewed patients undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP) in two cohorts: "immediate RP group," with GG2/3 cancer on diagnostic biopsy, and "AS group," with GG1 cancer on initial biopsy that was upgraded to GG2/3 on confirmatory biopsy.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Probabilities of biochemical recurrence (BCR) and salvage therapy were determined using multivariable Cox regression models with risk adjustment. Risks of adverse pathology at RP were also compared using logistic regression.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

The immediate RP group comprised 4009 patients and the AS group comprised 321 patients. The AS group had lower adjusted rates of adverse pathology (27% vs 35%, p = 0.003). BCR rates were lower in the AS group, although this did not reach conventional significance (hazard ratio [HR] 0.73, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.50-1.06, p = 0.10) compared with the immediate RP group. Risk-adjusted 1- and 5-yr BCR rates were 4.6% (95% CI 3.0-6.5%) and 10.4% (95% CI 6.9-14%), respectively, for the AS group compared with 6.3% (95% CI 5.6-7.0%) and 20% (95% CI 19-22%), respectively, in the immediate RP group. A nonsignificant association was observed for salvage treatment-free survival favoring the AS group (HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.42, 1.06, p = 0.087).

CONCLUSIONS

We found that men with GG1 cancer who were upgraded on confirmatory biopsy tend to have less aggressive disease than men with the same grade found at initial biopsy. These results must be confirmed in larger series before recommendations can be made regarding a more conservative approach in men with upgraded pathology on surveillance biopsy.

PATIENT SUMMARY

We studied men with low-risk prostate cancer who were initially eligible for active surveillance but presented with more aggressive cancer on confirmatory biopsy. We found that outcomes for these men were better than the outcomes for those diagnosed initially with more serious cancer.

Effect of alpha-blocker use on morbidity and lower urinary tract symptoms in patients undergoing transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate voiding dysfunction and morbidity after transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided prostate biopsy and to investigate whether pre-intervention alpha-blocker treatment had any effect on morbidity and voiding dysfunction.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study included 197 consecutive patients who underwent TRUS-guided prostate biopsy between January 2014 and January 2018. The patients were divided into two groups, those receiving alpha-blocker (silodosin) and those not receiving alpha-blocker treatment before the procedure (controls). All patients were evaluated before and one week after the procedure with the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), measurements of maximum flow rate (Q_max), post-void residual urine volume (PVR) and prostate volume, and procedure-related complications were also recorded. All analyzed parameters were compared by within-group and between-group evaluations.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of IPSS, Q_max and prostate volume values before biopsy. In the follow-up evaluation performed on the seventh day after biopsy, IPSS, PVR and prostate volume were found to be increased, whereas Q_max was decreased in the control group (p < 0.05). In the silodosin group, an increase in prostate volume was observed, but there were no significant changes in IPSS, Q_max and PVR values. Acute urinary retention (AUR) after the biopsy procedure developed in two patients (2%) in the silodosin group, and in nine patients (9.1%) in the control group (p = 0.02). No significant difference was found between the two groups in terms of biopsy-related complications, except for AUR.

CONCLUSION

We believe that alpha-blocker treatment initiated before biopsy may be advantageous in preventing voiding dysfunction that may develop after the procedure.

The impact of very high initial PSA on oncological outcomes after radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

To analyze oncological outcomes of very high-risk patients with initial PSA 50-99.9 and ≥100 ng/ml who underwent radical prostatectomy (RP) for clinically localized prostate cancer.

METHODS

Overall, 2,811 RP patients (1992-2018) with negative preoperative CT-scan and bone scintigraphy were included. The impact of preoperative PSA level, categorized as 20-49.9 (n = 2,195) vs. 50-99.9 (n = 454) vs. ≥100 ng/ml (n = 162) on biochemical recurrence (BCR)-free survival, metastasis-free survival (MFS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) was assessed using Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox regression models.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 47.5 months. Ten-year BCR-free survival rates were 46.9 vs. 32.1 vs. 29.0% within PSA-categories 20-49.9 vs. 50-99.9 vs. ≥100 ng/ml, respectively (P < 0.001). Ten-year MFS rates were 78.4 vs. 67.2 vs. 37.3% within PSA-categories 20-49.9 vs. 50-99.9 vs. ≥100 ng/ml (P < 0.001). 10-year CSS rates were 93.7 vs. 85.5 vs. 66.7% within PSA-categories 20-49.9 vs. 50-99.9 vs. ≥100 ng/ml (P < 0.001). In multivariable analyses, PSA-categories 50-99.9 ng/ml and ≥100 ng/ml were independently predicting higher risk of BCR (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.3 and 1.4), metastatic progression (HR: 1.4 and 2.3), and cancer-specific mortality (CSM, HR: 1.9 and 3.4) compared with PSA-category 20-49.9 ng/ml.

CONCLUSION

Initial PSA levels ≥50 ng/ml are associated with higher risk of BCR, metastatic progression, and CSM compared with high-risk patients with PSA of 20-49.9 ng/ml. In consequence, these patients may be counseled about a potentially increased risk of undetected metastases prior to RP possibly necessitating intensified multimodal treatments in the future.