1
|
Zhou W, Yang Y, Wang W, Yang C, Cao Z, Lin X, Zhang H, Xiao Y, Zhang X. Pseudogene OCT4-pg5 upregulates OCT4B expression to promote bladder cancer progression by competing with miR-145-5p. Cell Cycle 2024:1-17. [PMID: 38842275 DOI: 10.1080/15384101.2024.2353554] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2023] [Accepted: 05/05/2024] [Indexed: 06/07/2024] Open
Abstract
Bladder cancer (BC) is one of the most common malignant neoplasms worldwide. Competing endogenous RNA (ceRNA) networks may identify potential biomarkers associated with the progression and prognosis of BC. The OCT4-pg5/miR-145-5p/OCT4B ceRNA network was found to be related to the progression and prognosis of BC. OCT4-pg5 expression was significantly higher in BC cell lines than in normal bladder cells, with OCT4-pg5 expression correlating with OCT4B expression and advanced tumor grade. Overexpression of OCT4-pg5 and OCT4B promoted the proliferation and invasion of BC cells, whereas miR-145-5p suppressed these activities. The 3' untranslated region (3'UTR) of OCT4-pg5 competed for miR-145-5p, thereby increasing OCT4B expression. In addition, OCT4-pg5 promoted epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) by activating the Wnt/β-catenin pathway and upregulating the expression of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) 2 and 9 as well as the transcription factors zinc finger E-box binding homeobox (ZEB) 1 and 2. Elevated expression of OCT4-pg5 and OCT4B reduced the sensitivity of BC cells to cisplatin by reducing apoptosis and increasing the proportion of cells in G1. The OCT4-pg5/miR-145-5p/OCT4B axis promotes the progression of BC by inducing EMT via the Wnt/β-catenin pathway and enhances cisplatin resistance. This axis may represent a therapeutic target in patients with BC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wuer Zhou
- The Department of Urology, General Hospital of Southern Theater Command, PLA, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yue Yang
- The Department of Urology, General Hospital of Southern Theater Command, PLA, Guangzhou, China
- The First School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Wei Wang
- The Department of Urology, General Hospital of Southern Theater Command, PLA, Guangzhou, China
- The First School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Chenglin Yang
- The Department of Urology, General Hospital of Southern Theater Command, PLA, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhi Cao
- The Department of Urology, General Hospital of Southern Theater Command, PLA, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xiaoyu Lin
- The Department of Urology, General Hospital of Southern Theater Command, PLA, Guangzhou, China
| | - Huifen Zhang
- The Department of Urology, General Hospital of Southern Theater Command, PLA, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yuansong Xiao
- The Department of Urology, General Hospital of Southern Theater Command, PLA, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xiaoming Zhang
- The Department of Urology, General Hospital of Southern Theater Command, PLA, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Yu CC, Chang CH, Fang JK, Huang SK, Tseng WH, Lee HY, Yeh HC, Chen IHA, Lin JT, Chen PC, Cheong IS, Hsueh TY, Jiang YH, Lee YK, Chen WC, Lo SH, Lin PH, Wang SS, Huang CY, Wu CC, Tseng JS, Wu SY, Tsai YC. Impact of pathological response on oncological outcomes in patients with upper tract urothelial cancer receiving neo-adjuvant chemotherapy. J Formos Med Assoc 2023; 122:1274-1281. [PMID: 37400294 DOI: 10.1016/j.jfma.2023.06.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2022] [Revised: 03/24/2023] [Accepted: 06/05/2023] [Indexed: 07/05/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this study is to evaluate the rates of pathological complete response (ypT0N0/X) and pathological response (ypT1N0/X or less) in patients with upper tract urothelial cancer who were treated with neo-adjuvant chemotherapy and to examine their impact on oncological outcomes. METHODS This study is a multi-institutional retrospective analysis of patients with high-risk upper tract urothelial cancer who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radical nephroureterectomy between 2002 and 2021. Logistic regression analyses were used to investigate all clinical parameters for response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Cox proportional hazard models were performed to assess the effect of the response on the oncological outcomes. RESULTS A total of 84 patients with UTUC who received neo-adjuvant chemotherapy were identified. Among them, 44 (52.4%) patients received cisplatin-based chemotherapy, and 22 (26.2%) patients had a carboplatin-based regimen. The pathological complete response rate was 11.6% (n = 10), and the pathological response rate was 42.9% (n = 36). Multifocal tumors or tumors larger than 3 cm significantly reduced the odds of pathological response. In the multivariable Cox proportional hazard model, pathological response was independently associated with better overall survival (HR 0.38, p = 0.024), cancer-specific survival (HR 0.24, p = 0.033), and recurrence-free survival (HR 0.17, p = 0.001), but it was not associated with bladder recurrence-free survival (HR 0.84, p = 0.69). CONCLUSION Pathological response after neo-adjuvant chemotherapy and radical nephroureterectomy is strongly associated with patient survival and recurrence, and it might be a good surrogate for evaluating the efficacy of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chih-Chin Yu
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital, The Buddhist Medical Foundation, New Taipei City, Taiwan; School of Medicine, Buddhist Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan
| | - Chao-Hsiang Chang
- Department of Urology, China Medical University and Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan; School of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Jen-Kai Fang
- Department of Urology, China Medical University and Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Steven K Huang
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Chi Mei Medical Center, Taiwan; Department of Medical Science Industries, College of Health Sciences, Chang Jung Christian University, Tainan City, Taiwan; School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Taiwan
| | - Wen-Hsin Tseng
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Chi Mei Medical Center, Taiwan
| | - Hsiang-Ying Lee
- School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Taiwan; Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan; Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Municipal Ta-Tung Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan; Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Hsin-Chih Yeh
- School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Taiwan; Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan; Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Municipal Ta-Tung Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan; Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - I-Hsuan Alan Chen
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan
| | - Jen-Tai Lin
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan
| | - Pi-Che Chen
- Department of Urology, Ditmanson Medical Foundation Chiayi Christian Hospital, Chiayi, Taiwan
| | - Ian-Seng Cheong
- Department of Urology, Ditmanson Medical Foundation Chiayi Christian Hospital, Chiayi, Taiwan
| | - Thomas Y Hsueh
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taipei City Hospital Renai Branch, Taiwan; Department of Urology, School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Yuan-Hong Jiang
- Department of Urology, Hualien Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation and Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan
| | - Yu-Khun Lee
- Department of Urology, Hualien Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation and Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan
| | - Wei-Chieh Chen
- Department of Urology, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Shih-Hsiu Lo
- Department of Urology, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Po-Hung Lin
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Taoyuan, Taiwan; Graduate Institute of Clinical Medical Science, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan; School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Shian-Shiang Wang
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan; Institute of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan; Department of Applied Chemistry, National Chi Nan University, Nantou, Taiwan
| | - Chao-Yuan Huang
- Department of Urology, National Taiwan University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chia-Chang Wu
- Department of Urology, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Urology, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, New Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Jen-Shu Tseng
- Department of Urology, MacKay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; Mackay Medical College, Taipei, Taiwan; Institute of Biomedical Informatics, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Shu-Yu Wu
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital, The Buddhist Medical Foundation, New Taipei City, Taiwan; School of Medicine, Buddhist Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan
| | - Yao-Chou Tsai
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital, The Buddhist Medical Foundation, New Taipei City, Taiwan; School of Medicine, Buddhist Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Pinar U, Calleris G, Grobet-Jeandin E, Grande P, Benamran D, Thibault C, Gontero P, Rouprêt M, Seisen T. The role of perioperative chemotherapy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma patients treated with radical nephroureterectomy. World J Urol 2023; 41:3205-3230. [PMID: 36905443 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-023-04330-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2022] [Accepted: 02/05/2023] [Indexed: 03/12/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To summarize evidence regarding the use of neoadjuvant (NAC) and adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) among patients treated with radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). METHODS A comprehensive literature search of PubMed (MEDLINE), EMBASE and the Cochrane library was performed to identify any original or review article on the role of perioperative chemotherapy for UTUC patients treated with RNU. RESULTS With regards to NAC, retrospective studies consistently suggested that it may be associated with better pathological downstaging (pDS) ranging from 10.8 to 80% and complete response (pCR) ranging from 4.3 to 15%, while decreasing the risk of recurrence and death as compared to RNU alone. Even higher pDS ranging from 58 to 75% and pCR ranging from 14 to 38% were observed in single-arm phase II trials. With regards to AC, retrospective studies provided conflicting results although the largest report from the National Cancer Database suggested an overall survival benefit in pT3-T4 and/or pN + patients. In addition, a phase III randomized controlled trial showed that the use of AC was associated with a disease-free survival benefit (HR = 0.45; 95% CI = [0.30-0.68]; p = 0.0001) in pT2-T4 and/or pN + patients with acceptable toxicity profile. This benefit was consistent in all subgroups analyzed. CONCLUSIONS Perioperative chemotherapy improves oncological outcomes associated with RNU. Given the impact of RNU on renal function, the rational is stronger for the use of NAC which impacts final pathology and potentially prolongs survival. However, the level of evidence is stronger for the use of AC that has been proven to decrease the risk of recurrence after RNU with a potential survival benefit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ugo Pinar
- GRC 5, Predictive Onco-Urology, APHP, Pitié-Salpêtrière, Urology, Sorbonne University, 75013, Paris, France
| | - Giorgio Calleris
- Department of Urology, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, Città Della Salute E Della Scienza and University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | | | - Pietro Grande
- GRC 5, Predictive Onco-Urology, APHP, Pitié-Salpêtrière, Urology, Sorbonne University, 75013, Paris, France
| | - Daniel Benamran
- Division of Urology, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Constance Thibault
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hopital Européen Georges Pompidou, Institut du Cancer Paris CARPEM, AP-HP Centre, Paris, France
| | - Paolo Gontero
- Department of Urology, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, Città Della Salute E Della Scienza and University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Morgan Rouprêt
- GRC 5, Predictive Onco-Urology, APHP, Pitié-Salpêtrière, Urology, Sorbonne University, 75013, Paris, France
| | - Thomas Seisen
- GRC 5, Predictive Onco-Urology, APHP, Pitié-Salpêtrière, Urology, Sorbonne University, 75013, Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kolawa A, D’Souza A, Tulpule V. Overview, Diagnosis, and Perioperative Systemic Therapy of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:4813. [PMID: 37835507 PMCID: PMC10571968 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15194813] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2023] [Revised: 09/13/2023] [Accepted: 09/26/2023] [Indexed: 10/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Upper tract urothelial carcinoma comprises 5-10% of all urothelial carcinoma cases. This disease tends to have a more aggressive course than its lower urinary tract counterpart, with 60% of patients presenting with invasive disease and 30% of patients presenting with metastatic disease at diagnosis. The diagnostic workup of UTUC involves imaging with CT urogram, urine cytology, and direct visualization and biopsy of suspected lesions via ureteroscopy. Standard treatment of high-grade UTUC involves radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) and excision of the ipsilateral bladder cuff. Both the NCCN and EAU Guidelines include neoadjuvant chemotherapy as a treatment option for select patients with UTUC; however, there are no strict guidelines. Much of the rationale for neoadjuvant chemotherapy is based on extrapolation from data from muscle-invasive bladder cancer, which has demonstrated a 5-year OS benefit of 5-8%. Retrospective studies evaluating the use of NACT in urothelial carcinoma have yielded pathologic objective response rates of 48% in UTUC cohorts. The randomized Phase III POUT study noted a DFS advantage with adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy, compared with surveillance in UTUC, of 70% vs. 51% at 2 years. Though not the standard of care, multiple studies have explored the use of perioperative immunotherapy or chemoimmunotherapy in the management of invasive urothelial carcinoma. The PURE-02 study explored the use of neoadjuvant pembrolizumab in patients with high-risk UTUC. A small study of 10 patients, it showed no significant signals of activity with neoadjuvant pembrolizumab. Another Phase II study of neoadjuvant ipilimumab and nivolumab in cisplatin-ineligible UTUC yielded more promising findings, with 3/9 patients attaining a pathologic CR and the remaining six pathologically downstaged. The ABACUS trial found a 31% pathologic complete response rate amongst cisplatin-ineligible MIBC patients treated with neoadjuvant atezolizumab. The use of adjuvant immunotherapy has been explored over three phase III trials. The CheckMate-274 trial found a DFS benefit with the addition of one year of adjuvant nivolumab in patients with high-risk urothelial carcinoma. The IMvigor-010 study of adjuvant atezolizumab was a negative study. The AMBASSADOR trial of adjuvant pembrolizumab is pending results. With the FDA approval of erdafitinib in metastatic urothelial carcinoma, similar targets have been explored for use in perioperative use in invasive urothelial carcinoma, as with adjuvant infigratinib in the PROOF-302 trial. As the treatment paradigm for urothelial carcinoma evolves, further prospective studies are needed to expand the perioperative treatment landscape of UTUC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam Kolawa
- IRD 620, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Southern California, 2020 Zonal Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA;
| | - Anishka D’Souza
- USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, 1441 Eastlake Ave, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA;
| | - Varsha Tulpule
- USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, 1441 Eastlake Ave, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Nakamura R, Hasegawa G, Ikeda Y, Hara N, Nishiyama T. Complete remission following pembrolizumab therapy for a patient with nephroureterectomy positive-margin carcinoma in situ and bladder cancer unresponsive to Bacille Calmette-Guérin therapy. SAGE Open Med Case Rep 2023; 11:2050313X231185444. [PMID: 37440976 PMCID: PMC10333640 DOI: 10.1177/2050313x231185444] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2022] [Accepted: 06/13/2023] [Indexed: 07/15/2023] Open
Abstract
An 82-year-old man was diagnosed with synchronous non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer and left lower ureteral carcinoma. He underwent transurethral resection of the bladder tumor, followed by total left nephroureterectomy after preoperative chemotherapy with four courses of gemcitabine and carboplatin. Histopathological findings showed positive-margin carcinoma in situ. In addition, since recurrence of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer was observed in the bladder, Bacille Calmette-Guérin intravesical infusion therapy was performed, but the cancer persisted due to treatment resistance. After that, pembrolizumab therapy was performed, and complete remission was achieved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryohta Nakamura
- Department of Urology, Uonuma Institute of
Community Medicine, Niigata University Medical and Dental Hospital, Minamiuonuma, Niigata,
Japan
| | - Go Hasegawa
- Department of Pathology, Uonuma Institute of
Community Medicine, Niigata University Medical and Dental Hospital, Minamiuonuma, Niigata,
Japan
| | - Yohei Ikeda
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Uonuma
Institute of Community Medicine, Niigata University Medical and Dental Hospital,
Minamiuonuma, Niigata, Japan
| | - Noboru Hara
- Department of Urology, Uonuma Institute of
Community Medicine, Niigata University Medical and Dental Hospital, Minamiuonuma, Niigata,
Japan
| | - Tsutomu Nishiyama
- Department of Urology, Uonuma Institute of
Community Medicine, Niigata University Medical and Dental Hospital, Minamiuonuma, Niigata,
Japan
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kranz J, Hoffmann M, Alexa R, Kuppe C, Gaisa NT, Saar M. [Urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract]. UROLOGIE (HEIDELBERG, GERMANY) 2023:10.1007/s00120-023-02079-4. [PMID: 37261485 DOI: 10.1007/s00120-023-02079-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/08/2023] [Indexed: 06/02/2023]
Abstract
Urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract (upper tract urothelial carcinoma, UTUC) is less common than bladder carcinoma with nearly identical risk factors and has a poorer prognosis. The standard diagnostic procedure is imaging of the upper urinary tract by computed tomography urography. In cases of diagnostic uncertainty, a diagnostic ureterorenoscopy with biopsy sampling can be performed in addition to urine cytology. Treatment depends primarily on the stage and grading of the tumor. Depending on the extent and localization, organ-preserving treatment or radical nephroureterectomy is indicated. Perioperative systemic treatment in high-risk UTUC can be performed in both neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings, although the current data on neoadjuvant chemo- and immunotherapy do not yet allow standard application. For metastatic disease, a multimodal treatment approach consisting of cisplatin-based or carboplatin-based chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and treatment with enfortumab vedotin can be considered. Salvage surgery, radiotherapy and metastasectomy are available for rare individual cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Kranz
- Klinik für Urologie und Kinderurologie, Uniklinik RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstr. 30, 52074, Aachen, Deutschland.
- Universitätsklinik und Poliklinik für Urologie, Universitätsklinikum Halle (Saale), Halle (Saale), Deutschland.
| | - Marco Hoffmann
- Klinik für Urologie und Kinderurologie, Uniklinik RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstr. 30, 52074, Aachen, Deutschland
| | - Radu Alexa
- Klinik für Urologie und Kinderurologie, Uniklinik RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstr. 30, 52074, Aachen, Deutschland
| | - Christoph Kuppe
- Klinik für Nephrologie, Medizinische Klinik II, Uniklinik RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Deutschland
| | | | - Matthias Saar
- Klinik für Urologie und Kinderurologie, Uniklinik RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstr. 30, 52074, Aachen, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Grossmann NC, Pradere B, D'Andrea D, Schuettfort VM, Mori K, Rajwa P, Quhal F, Laukhtina E, Katayama S, Fankhauser CD, Xylinas E, Margulis V, Moschini M, Abufaraj M, Bandini M, Lonati C, Nyirady P, Karakiewicz PI, Fajkovic H, Shariat SF. Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Elderly Patients with Upper Tract Urothelial Cancer: Oncologic Outcomes from a Multicenter Study. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2022; 20:227-236. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2022.01.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2021] [Revised: 12/11/2021] [Accepted: 01/04/2022] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
|
8
|
König F, Shariat SF, Karakiewicz PI, Mun DH, Rink M, Pradere B. Quality indicators for the management of high-risk upper tract urothelial carcinoma requiring radical nephroureterectomy. Curr Opin Urol 2021; 31:291-296. [PMID: 33973537 DOI: 10.1097/mou.0000000000000895] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The purpose of this article was to identify quality indicators for an optimized management of high-risk upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) requiring radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). RECENT FINDINGS RNU with bladder cuff resection is the standard treatment of high-risk UTUC. For the bladder cuff resection, two main approaches are accepted: transvesical and extravesical. Lymph node dissection following a dedicated template should be performed in all high-risk patients undergoing RNU as it improves tumour staging and possibly survival. Postoperative bladder instillation of single-dose chemotherapy should be administered after RNU to decrease the risk of intravesical tumour recurrence. Perioperative systemic chemotherapy should always be considered for advanced cancers. Although level-1 evidence is available for adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy, neoadjuvant regimens are still being evaluated. SUMMARY Optimal management of high-risk UTUC requires evidence-based reproducible quality indicators in order to allow guidance and frameworks for clinical practices. Adherence to quality indicators allows for the measurement and comparison of outcomes that are likely to improve prognosis. Based on the literature, we found four evidence-based accepted quality indicators that are easily implementable to improve the management of high-risk UTUC patients treated with RNU: adequate management of the distal ureter/ bladder cuff, template-based lymph node dissection, single-shot postoperative intravesical chemotherapy, and perioperative systemic treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frederik König
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Texas, USA
- Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
- Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, Jordan University Hospital, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Centre, Montreal, Canada
| | - Dong-Ho Mun
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Michael Rink
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|