1
|
Stormezand GN, de Meyer E, Koopmans KP, Brouwers AH, Luurtsema G, Dierckx RAJO. Update on the Role of [ 18F]FDOPA PET/CT. Semin Nucl Med 2024:S0001-2998(24)00080-1. [PMID: 39384519 DOI: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2024.09.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2024] [Accepted: 09/19/2024] [Indexed: 10/11/2024]
Abstract
[18F]-dihydroxyphenylalanine ([18F]FDOPA) is a radiopharmaceutical used in a broad spectrum of diseases, including neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), congenital hyperinsulinism, parkinsonian syndromes and neuro-oncology. Genetic analysis and disease specific biomarkers may guide the optimum selection of patients that may benefit most from [18F]FDOPA PET in different stages of several neuroendocrine neoplasms and in congenital hyperinsulinism. For clinical routine in neuro-oncology, indications for [18F]FDOPA PET include tumor delineation and distinguishing between treatment related changes and recurrent disease. New developments as the advent of large axial field of view PET/CT or integrated PET/MRI systems may provide more unique opportunities, such as those related to detection of smaller lesions in primary staging of NETs, dose reduction in children with congenital hyperinsulinism, or possibilities to obtain more extensive noninvasive quantification of cerebral uptake by using image derived input functions. Although the widespread use of [18F]FDOPA has been hampered by complex synthesis methods and high production costs in the past, significant efforts have been undertaken to provide robust GMP compliant synthesis methods with high activity yield and molar activity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gilles N Stormezand
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Medical Imaging Center, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
| | - Eline de Meyer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Medical Imaging Center, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands; Department of Neurology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Klaas Pieter Koopmans
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Medical Imaging Center, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Adrienne H Brouwers
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Medical Imaging Center, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - G Luurtsema
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Medical Imaging Center, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Rudi A J O Dierckx
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Medical Imaging Center, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kirienko M, Gelardi F, Fiz F, Bauckneht M, Ninatti G, Pini C, Briganti A, Falconi M, Oyen WJG, van der Graaf WTA, Sollini M. Personalised PET imaging in oncology: an umbrella review of meta-analyses to guide the appropriate radiopharmaceutical choice and indication. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2024:10.1007/s00259-024-06882-9. [PMID: 39256216 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-024-06882-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2024] [Accepted: 08/09/2024] [Indexed: 09/12/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE For several years, oncological positron emission tomography (PET) has developed beyond 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-D-glucose ([18F]FDG). This umbrella review of meta-analyses aims to provide up-to-date, comprehensive, high-level evidence to support appropriate referral for a specific radiopharmaceutical PET/computed tomography (CT) or PET/magnetic resonance (MR) in the diagnosis and staging of solid cancers other than brain malignancies. METHODS We performed a systematic literature search on the PubMed/MEDLINE and EMBASE databases for meta-analyses assessing the accuracy of PET/CT and/or PET/MRI with [18F]FDG, somatostatin- receptor-targeting 68Ga-DOTA-peptides, 18F-labelled dihydroxyphenylalanine ([18F]DOPA), prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted radioligands, and fibroblast activation protein inhibitors (FAPI) in the diagnosis/disease characterisation and staging of solid cancers other than brain tumours. RESULTS The literature search yielded 449 scientific articles. After screening titles and abstracts and applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, we selected 173 meta-analyses to assess the strength of evidence. One article was selected from references. Sixty-four meta-analyses were finally considered. The current evidence corroborates the role of [18F]FDG as the main player in molecular imaging; PSMA tracers are useful in staging and re-staging prostate cancer; somatostatin-targeting peptides (e.g. [68Ga]Ga- DOTA-TOC and -TATE) or [18F]DOPA are valuable in neuroendocrine tumours (NETs). FAPI has emerged in gastric cancer assessment. According to search and selection criteria, no satisfactory meta-analysis was selected for the diagnosis/detection of oesophageal cancer, the diagnosis/detection and N staging of small cell lung cancer and hepatic cell carcinoma, the diagnosis/detection and M staging of melanoma and Merkel cell carcinoma, cervical, vulvar and penis cancers, the N and M staging of lung and gastroenteropancreatic NET, testicular cancer, and chondrosarcoma, and the M staging of differentiated thyroid, bladder and anal cancers. CONCLUSION The comprehensive high-level evidence synthesised in the present umbrella review serves as a guiding compass for clinicians and imagers, aiding them in navigating the increasingly intricate seascape of PET examinations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Margarita Kirienko
- Nuclear Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Fabrizia Gelardi
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Via Olgettina 58, Milan, 20132, Italy
| | - Francesco Fiz
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, E.O. "Ospedali Galliera", Genoa, Italy
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Clinical Molecular Imaging, University Hospital, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Matteo Bauckneht
- Department of Health Science (DISSAL), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
- Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Gaia Ninatti
- School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy.
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, 20132, Italy.
| | - Cristiano Pini
- School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, 20132, Italy
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Via Olgettina 58, Milan, 20132, Italy
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Massimo Falconi
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Via Olgettina 58, Milan, 20132, Italy
- Pancreatic and Transplant Surgery Unit, San Raffaele Hospital, Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy
| | - Wim J G Oyen
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, The Netherlands
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Milan, Italy
| | - Winette T A van der Graaf
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Martina Sollini
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Via Olgettina 58, Milan, 20132, Italy
- School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Paparo F, Panvini N, Montale A, Pigati M, Marinaro E, Melani EF, Piccardo A, Molini L. Multimodality imaging features of small bowel cancers complicating Crohn's disease: a pictorial review. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2024; 49:2083-2097. [PMID: 38441632 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-024-04201-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2023] [Revised: 01/02/2024] [Accepted: 01/12/2024] [Indexed: 06/29/2024]
Abstract
Patients with Crohn's disease (CD) are at increased risk of developing small bowel cancer, since chronic inflammation may trigger the histopathological sequence that begins from low-grade dysplasia of the intestinal epithelium and may eventually lead to malignant transformation. Owing to their location in a portion of the gastrointestinal tract which is not easily accessible to conventional endoscopic techniques, the detection of CD-related small bowel cancers is still a clinical challenge. The radiological features of CD-related small bowel adenocarcinoma (SBA) in patients with CD have been described in some previous studies, including its appearance in both CT and MRI examinations. Radiological signs of active or fibrostenotic CD may be intermixed with those suggesting the presence of CD-related SBA. In CT studies, the most relevant findings consistent with malignant transformation are the presence of a stricture with irregular asymmetric thickening of small bowel walls, loss of mural stratification, and moderate enhancement after intravenous administration of iodinated contrast media, in association with enlarged adjacent mesenteric lymph nodes. Many of the CD-related SBA features that can be observed on CT imaging are similar to those detectable by MRI. This latter modality provides the additional value of the functional characterization of small bowel strictures, thereby helping to distinguish between inflammatory, fibrotic, and malignant stenosis in the setting of active CD. Positron Emission Tomography (PET)/CT enables the metabolic assessment of enlarged mesenteric lymph nodes, and PET/MRI fusion imaging can incorporate morphological, functional and metabolic information into a single set of imaging data, thus overcoming the limitations of the separate assessment of each individual modality. Owing to the low incidence and prevalence of this long-term complication of CD, we believe that a detailed multimodality pictorial essay on this topic, also including the PET-CT and fusion imaging documentation of some cases, would be useful to the medical literature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Paparo
- Diagnostic Imaging Unit, E.O. Ospedali Galliera, Mura Delle Cappuccine 14, 16128, Genoa, Italy
| | - Nicola Panvini
- Diagnostic Imaging Unit, E.O. Ospedali Galliera, Mura Delle Cappuccine 14, 16128, Genoa, Italy.
| | - Amedeo Montale
- Gastroenterology Unit, E.O. Ospedali Galliera, Mura Delle Cappuccine 14, 16128, Genoa, Italy
| | - Maria Pigati
- Diagnostic Imaging Unit, E.O. Ospedali Galliera, Mura Delle Cappuccine 14, 16128, Genoa, Italy
| | - Eugenio Marinaro
- Pathology Unit, E.O. Ospedali Galliera, Mura Delle Cappuccine 14, 16128, Genoa, Italy
| | - Enrico Francesco Melani
- Diagnostic Imaging Unit, E.O. Ospedali Galliera, Mura Delle Cappuccine 14, 16128, Genoa, Italy
| | - Arnoldo Piccardo
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, E.O. Ospedali Galliera, Mura Delle Cappuccine 14, 16128, Genoa, Italy
| | - Lucio Molini
- Diagnostic Imaging Unit, E.O. Ospedali Galliera, Mura Delle Cappuccine 14, 16128, Genoa, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ouvrard E, Kaseb A, Poterszman N, Porot C, Somme F, Imperiale A. Nuclear medicine imaging for bone metastases assessment: what else besides bone scintigraphy in the era of personalized medicine? Front Med (Lausanne) 2024; 10:1320574. [PMID: 38288299 PMCID: PMC10823373 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1320574] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2023] [Accepted: 12/28/2023] [Indexed: 01/31/2024] Open
Abstract
Accurate detection and reliable assessment of therapeutic responses in bone metastases are imperative for guiding treatment decisions, preserving quality of life, and ultimately enhancing overall survival. Nuclear imaging has historically played a pivotal role in this realm, offering a diverse range of radiotracers and imaging modalities. While the conventional bone scan using 99mTc marked bisphosphonates has remained widely utilized, its diagnostic performance is hindered by certain limitations. Positron emission tomography, particularly when coupled with computed tomography, provides improved spatial resolution and diagnostic performance with various pathology-specific radiotracers. This review aims to evaluate the performance of different nuclear imaging modalities in clinical practice for detecting and monitoring the therapeutic responses in bone metastases of diverse origins, addressing their limitations and implications for image interpretation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric Ouvrard
- Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe (ICANS), University Hospitals of Strasbourg, University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Ashjan Kaseb
- Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe (ICANS), University Hospitals of Strasbourg, University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
- Radiology, College of Medicine, University of Jeddah, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Nathan Poterszman
- Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe (ICANS), University Hospitals of Strasbourg, University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Clémence Porot
- Radiopharmacy, Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe (ICANS), Strasbourg, France
| | - Francois Somme
- Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe (ICANS), University Hospitals of Strasbourg, University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Alessio Imperiale
- Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe (ICANS), University Hospitals of Strasbourg, University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
- IPHC, UMR 7178, CNRS/Unistra, Strasbourg, France
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Shin SY, Shen TC, Wank SA, Summers RM. Fully-automated detection of small bowel carcinoid tumors in CT scans using deep learning. Med Phys 2023; 50:7865-7878. [PMID: 36988164 PMCID: PMC10539477 DOI: 10.1002/mp.16391] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2022] [Revised: 02/20/2023] [Accepted: 03/15/2023] [Indexed: 03/30/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Small bowel carcinoid tumor is a rare neoplasm and increasing in incidence. Patients with small bowel carcinoid tumors often experience long delays in diagnosis due to the vague symptoms, slow growth of tumors, and lack of clinician awareness. Computed tomography (CT) is the most common imaging study for diagnosis of small bowel carcinoid tumor. It is often used with positron emission tomography (PET) to capture anatomical and functional aspects of carcinoid tumors and thus to increase the sensitivity. PURPOSE We compared three different kinds of methods for the automatic detection of small bowel carcinoid tumors on CT scans, which is the first to the best of our knowledge. METHODS Thirty-three preoperative CT scans of 33 unique patients with surgically-proven carcinoid tumors within the small bowel were collected. Ground-truth segmentation of tumors was drawn on CT scans by referring to available 18 F-DOPA PET scans and the corresponding radiology report. These scans were split into the trainval set (n = 24) and the test positive set (n= 9). Additionally, 22 CT scans of 22 unique patients who had no evidence of the tumor were collected to comprise the test negative set. We compared three different kinds of detection methods, which are detection network, patch-based classification, and segmentation-based methods. We also investigated the usefulness of small bowel segmentation for reduction of false positives (FPs) for each method. Free-response receiver operating characteristic (FROC) curves and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used for lesion- and patient-level evaluations, respectively. Statistical analyses comparing the FROC and ROC curves were also performed. RESULTS The detection network method performed the best among the compared methods. For lesion-level detection, the detection network method, without the small bowel segmentation-based filtering, achieved sensitivity values of (60.8%, 81.1%, 82.4%, 86.5%) at per-scan FP rates of (1, 2, 4 ,8), respectively. The use of the small bowel segmentation did not improve the performance (p = 0.742 $p=0.742$ ). For patient-level detection, again the detection network method, but with the small bowel segmentation-based filtering, achieved the highest AUC of 0.86 with a sensitivity of 78% and specificity of 82% at the Youden point. CONCLUSIONS The carcinoid tumors in this patient population were very small and potentially difficult to diagnose. The presented method showed reasonable sensitivity at small numbers of FPs for lesion-level detection. It also achieved a promising AUC for patient-level detection. The method may have clinical application in patients with this rare and difficult to detect disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seung Yeon Shin
- Imaging Biomarkers and Computer-Aided Diagnosis Laboratory, Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Thomas C Shen
- Imaging Biomarkers and Computer-Aided Diagnosis Laboratory, Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Stephen A Wank
- Digestive Disease Branch, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Ronald M Summers
- Imaging Biomarkers and Computer-Aided Diagnosis Laboratory, Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Singh MK, Mohan VSK, Kaushik C. Operational and Performance Experience with uMI550 Digital PET-CT during Routine Quality Control Procedures. World J Nucl Med 2023; 22:267-275. [PMID: 38152105 PMCID: PMC10751135 DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1777696] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction The quality control (QC) procedures for positron emission tomography (PET) scanners are covered by National Electrical Manufacturers Association and International Electrotechnical Commission. QC must be carried out at regular intervals according to the specifications of the scanner manufacturer. Daily and weekly QC plays a valuable role in monitoring positron emission tomography (PET) scanner performance changes. This study shares operational and performance experience of QC procedures that do not require a radioactive Ge-68 source to perform daily QC and experience with fluorodeoxyglucose F18 ( 18 F-FDG) as a substitute for germanium-68/sodium-22 (Ge-68/Na-22) source for weekly QC. Method This study was performed on an uMI550 digital positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) scanner. In this scanner daily QC checks system temperature and humidity, system count rate, data link status, and voltage. QC was performed at the console control, the position of the scanner table was in the home position pulled out from the gantry, and the room was closed during the quick QC. Weekly full QC check items include look-up table drift, energy drift, time-of-flight status, C-map status, temperature and humidity, and voltage. Weekly full QC was performed with a 18 F-FDG source in a rod phantom source. Results Over 200 daily QC tests without a radioactive source Ge-68 phantom and 50 full weekly QC tests using a 18 F-FDG rod phantom were performed with this scanner according to the manufacturer's instructions and a test report was generated. No daily QC errors or warnings were observed during this period. Conclusion The new approach for the daily PET QC does not expose operators to radiation. This translates into commercial and operational merits with consistent performance and results. Implications for Practice Reduction in radiation exposure to operating staff during QC procedure in PET-CT scanner.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manoj Kumar Singh
- Medikabazaar, Technopolis Knowledge Park, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | | | - Chanchal Kaushik
- School of Health and Society, University of Salford, Manchester, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
De Rycke O, Perrier M, Ouvrard É, Mennetrey C, Lachachi C, Bando-Delaunay A, Morland D, Goichot B, Taieb D, Walter T, Cadiot G, Cros J, Hentic O, Ruszniewski P, Lebtahi R, Imperiale A, de Mestier L. High Tumor Uptake on 18F-FDOPA PET/CT Indicates Poor Prognosis in Patients with Metastatic Midgut Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Study from the Groupe d'étude des Tumeurs Endocrines and ENDOCAN-RENATEN Network. J Nucl Med 2023; 64:1699-1705. [PMID: 37652547 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.123.265584] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2023] [Revised: 07/17/2023] [Indexed: 09/02/2023] Open
Abstract
PET/CT with 6-18F-fluoro-l-dopa (18F-FDOPA) has high diagnostic performance for midgut neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). We explored the prognostic role of 18F-FDOPA PET/CT uptake in metastatic midgut NETs. Methods: We included, in a test cohort (n = 166) and a full external validation cohort (n = 86), all consecutive patients with metastatic midgut NETs who underwent 18F-FDOPA PET/CT in 5 expert centers from 2010 to 2021. We measured the maximal uptake (SUVmax and SUVpeak) of the tumor and nontumor liver on each 18F-FDOPA PET/CT scan. We measured overall survival (OS) from the time of PET/CT and assessed prognostic factors using Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox proportional-hazards analyses in the test cohort, with replication in the validation cohort. Results: Patients had similar characteristics in both cohorts. In the test cohort, median follow-up was 60.3 mo. Patients with an SUVpeak tumor-to-liver (T/L) ratio of more than 4.2 had significantly shorter survival than those with a ratio of 4.2 or less (P = 0.01), with a 5-y OS rate of 74.1% ± 4.5% versus 95% ± 3.4%, respectively. On multivariable analysis, an SUVpeak T/L ratio of more than 4.2 remained associated with shorter OS (hazard ratio, 2.30; 95% CI, 1.02-5.22; P = 0.046) after adjustment for age, grade, number of previous lines, number of metastatic sites, and presence of carcinoid syndrome. In the validation cohort, the 5-y OS rate was 100% versus 57.8% ± 12.5% in patients with an SUVpeak T/L ratio ≤ 4.2 or > 4.2, respectively (P = 0.075). An increasing SUVpeak T/L ratio over time tended to have a pejorative prognostic impact. Conclusion: Tumor uptake on 18F-FDOPA PET/CT is an independent prognostic factor in patients with metastatic midgut NETs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ophélie De Rycke
- Department of Pancreatology and Digestive Oncology, Beaujon Hospital, Université Paris-Cité, AP-HP.Nord, Clichy, France
- INSERM UMR 1149, Centre de Recherche sur l'Inflammation, Paris, France
| | - Marine Perrier
- Department of Hepato-Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology, CHU Reims, Université de Reims Champagne-Ardenne, Reims, France
| | - Éric Ouvrard
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hautepierre University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
| | - Clément Mennetrey
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, La Timone University Hospital, Université d'Aix-Marseille, Marseille, France
| | - Choaib Lachachi
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Edouard-Herriot University Hospital, Lyon, France
| | - Aurélie Bando-Delaunay
- INSERM UMR 1149, Centre de Recherche sur l'Inflammation, Paris, France
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Beaujon Hospital, Université Paris-Cité, AP-HP.Nord, Clichy, France
| | - David Morland
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Institut Godinot, Reims, France
- Université de Reims Champagne Ardenne, CReSTIC, EA 3804, Reims, France
| | - Bernard Goichot
- Department of Endocrinology, Hautepierre University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
| | - David Taieb
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, La Timone University Hospital, Université d'Aix-Marseille, Marseille, France
| | - Thomas Walter
- Department of Digestive Oncology, Edouard-Herriot University Hospital, Lyon, France; and
| | - Guillaume Cadiot
- Department of Hepato-Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology, CHU Reims, Université de Reims Champagne-Ardenne, Reims, France
| | - Jérôme Cros
- INSERM UMR 1149, Centre de Recherche sur l'Inflammation, Paris, France
- Department of Pathology, Beaujon Hospital, AP-HP.Nord, Université Paris-Cité, Clichy, France
| | - Olivia Hentic
- Department of Pancreatology and Digestive Oncology, Beaujon Hospital, Université Paris-Cité, AP-HP.Nord, Clichy, France
| | - Philippe Ruszniewski
- Department of Pancreatology and Digestive Oncology, Beaujon Hospital, Université Paris-Cité, AP-HP.Nord, Clichy, France
- INSERM UMR 1149, Centre de Recherche sur l'Inflammation, Paris, France
| | - Rachida Lebtahi
- INSERM UMR 1149, Centre de Recherche sur l'Inflammation, Paris, France
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Beaujon Hospital, Université Paris-Cité, AP-HP.Nord, Clichy, France
| | - Alessio Imperiale
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hautepierre University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
| | - Louis de Mestier
- Department of Pancreatology and Digestive Oncology, Beaujon Hospital, Université Paris-Cité, AP-HP.Nord, Clichy, France;
- INSERM UMR 1149, Centre de Recherche sur l'Inflammation, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Jiao F, Cui J, Fu D, Li Q, Wu Z, Teng Z, Zhang H, Zhou J, Zhang Z, Chen X, Zhou Y, Li Y, Mou Y, Qin R, Sun Y, Jin G, Cheng Y, Wang J, Ren G, Yue J, Jin G, Xiao X, Wang L. Chinese Medical Association consensus for standardized diagnosis and treatment of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms. Chin Med J (Engl) 2023; 136:2397-2411. [PMID: 37690992 PMCID: PMC10586833 DOI: 10.1097/cm9.0000000000002848] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2023] [Indexed: 09/12/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Feng Jiao
- Department of Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Systems Medicine for Cancer, Shanghai Cancer Institute, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200127, China
| | - Jiujie Cui
- Department of Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Systems Medicine for Cancer, Shanghai Cancer Institute, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200127, China
| | - Deliang Fu
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200040, China
| | - Qi Li
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai General Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200080, China
| | - Zheng Wu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiao Tong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710061, China
| | - Zan Teng
- Department of Oncology, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning 110801, China
| | - Hongmei Zhang
- Department of Medical Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710032, China
| | - Jun Zhou
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing 100142, China
| | - Zhihong Zhang
- Department of Pathology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210029, China
| | - Xiaobing Chen
- Department of Oncology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan 450003, China
| | - Yuhong Zhou
- Department of Medical Oncology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
| | - Yixiong Li
- Department of General Surgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan 410008, China
| | - Yiping Mou
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Pancreatic Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310014, China
| | - Renyi Qin
- Department of Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Affiliated Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei 430030, China
| | - Yongwei Sun
- Department of Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200127, China
| | - Gang Jin
- Department of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surgery, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China
| | - Yuejuan Cheng
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China
| | - Jian Wang
- Department of Radiology, Shanghai Changzheng Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200003, China
| | - Gang Ren
- Department of Radiotherapy, Peking University Shougang Hospital, Beijing 100144, China
| | - Jiang Yue
- Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200127, China
| | - Guangxin Jin
- Department of Interventional Oncology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200127, China
| | - Xiuying Xiao
- Department of Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Systems Medicine for Cancer, Shanghai Cancer Institute, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200127, China
| | - Liwei Wang
- Department of Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Systems Medicine for Cancer, Shanghai Cancer Institute, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200127, China
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Jain S, Dhingra VK. An overview of radiolabeled amino acid tracers in oncologic imaging. Front Oncol 2023; 13:983023. [PMID: 36874105 PMCID: PMC9981995 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.983023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2022] [Accepted: 01/23/2023] [Indexed: 02/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Molecular imaging has witnessed a great progress in the field of oncology over the past few decades. Radiolabeled amino acid (AA) tracers are particularly helpful in the areas where the utility of 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography with computed tomography imaging has been limited such as in evaluating brain tumors, neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), and prostate cancer. Radiolabeled AA tracers such as 6-[18F]-L-fluoro-L-3, 4-dihydroxyphenylalanine (18F-FDOPA), 18F-fluoro-ethyl-tyrosine (18F-FET), and 11C-methionine have found wide applications in brain tumors, which, unlike 18F-FDG, concentrate in the tumor tissue to a greater extent than that in normal brain tissue by providing accurate information about tumor volume and boundaries. 18F-FDOPA is also useful in evaluating NETs. Tracers such as 18F-FACBC (Fluciclovine) and anti-1-amino-2-[18F]fluorocyclopentyl-1-carboxylic acid (18F-FACPC) are used in imaging of prostate cancer and provide valuable information of locoregional, recurrent, and metastatic disease. This review highlights AA tracers and their major applications in imaging, viz., in evaluating brain tumors, NETs, and prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sanchay Jain
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences Bhopal, Bhopal, India
| | - Vandana Kumar Dhingra
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, India
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Resch K, Hung R, Abele J. Gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumor with discordant metastatic disease on 111In-pentetreotide SPECT/CT, 18F-DOPA PET/CT and 68Ga-HA-DOTATATE PET/CT. Eur J Hybrid Imaging 2022; 6:13. [PMID: 35781170 PMCID: PMC9250908 DOI: 10.1186/s41824-022-00134-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2022] [Accepted: 03/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
AbstractA 62-year-old man with resected, pathology-proven small bowel neuroendocrine tumor underwent 111In-pentetreotide SPECT/CT, 18F-DOPA PET/CT and 68Ga-HA-DOTATATE PET/CT to assess metastatic disease. The 111In-pentetreotide SPECT/CT scan showed no metastatic disease. Both 18F-DOPA and 68Ga-HA-DOTATATE PET/CT showed hepatic and peritoneal metastatic disease. However, the burden of 18F-DOPA-avid metastatic disease was far greater compared to the burden of 68Ga-HA-DOTATATE-avid metastatic disease.
Collapse
|
11
|
Ouvrard E, Mestier LD, Boursier C, Lachachi B, Sahakian N, Chevalier E, Mikail N, Carullo J, Bando-Delaunay A, Walter T, Malouf GG, Addeo P, Poncet G, Sebag F, Lebtahi R, Goichot B, Taïeb D, Imperiale A. 18F-DOPA PET/CT at the Forefront of Initial or Presurgical Evaluation of Small-Intestine Neuroendocrine Tumors. J Nucl Med 2022; 63:1865-1870. [PMID: 35589408 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.122.263984] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2022] [Revised: 04/27/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Our objective was to compare the respective value of 68Ga-DOTATOC and 18F-DOPA PET/CT for initial staging or presurgical work-up of patients with small-intestine neuroendocrine tumors (SiNETs). Methods: This was a retrospective, multicenter, noninterventional investigation involving 53 non-surgically treated SiNET patients who underwent both 68Ga-DOTATOC and 18F-DOPA PET/CT within a 6-mo interval without surgical intervention or therapeutic change between the 2 PET/CT studies. Percentage detection rate was calculated according to per-region and per-lesion analyses. Sensitivity for primary tumor detection was assessed in 37 surgically treated patients, taking surgical results (76 SiNETs) as the diagnostic gold standard. Results: 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT and 18F-DOPA PET/CT individually identified at least 1 primary SiNET in 92% (34/37) of the patients. Intestinal tumor multifocality was confirmed by histology in 8 patients. 68Ga-DOTATOC and 18F-DOPA PET/CT were concordantly positive for tumor multifocality in 5 patients, discordantly positive in 2 patients, and concordantly negative in 1 patient. The detection rate for subdiaphragmatic nodal metastases on per-region-based analysis was 91% and 98% for 68Ga-DOTATOC and 18F-DOPA PET/CT, respectively (P = 0.18). 18F-DOPA PET/CT detected a higher number of abnormal subdiaphragmatic nodes (P = 0.009). Regarding mesenteric nodes only, 18F-DOPA PET/CT detected more positive regions (P = 0.005) and nodal lesions (P = 0.003) than 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT, including nodes at the origin of mesenteric vessels. For detection of distant metastases, 68Ga-DOTATOC and 18F-DOPA PET/CT performed equally well on a per-region-based analysis. As compared with 68Ga-DOTATOC, 18F-DOPA PET/CT detected more hepatic (P < 0.001), peritoneal (P < 0.001), and lung metastases (P < 0.001). Conclusion: 18F-DOPA PET/CT detected more lesions than 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT in the studied patients. The respective roles of the two should be discussed in terms of disease staging and treatment selection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric Ouvrard
- Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe, University Hospitals of Strasbourg, University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Louis De Mestier
- Department of Pancreatology and Digestive Oncology, ENETS Centre of Excellence, Beaujon Hospital, Université de Paris, and INSERM U1149, Centre of Research in Inflammation, Paris, France
| | | | | | - Nicolas Sahakian
- Nuclear Medicine, La Timone University Hospital, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France
| | | | - Nidaa Mikail
- Nuclear Medicine, ENETS Centre of Excellence, Beaujon Hospital, Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Josefina Carullo
- Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe, University Hospitals of Strasbourg, University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.,Nuclear Medicine, Sanatorio Allende S.A., Cordoba, Argentina
| | - Aurélie Bando-Delaunay
- Nuclear Medicine, ENETS Centre of Excellence, Beaujon Hospital, Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Thomas Walter
- Medical Oncology, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Université Lyon 1, Lyon, France
| | - Gabriel G Malouf
- Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe, Strasbourg, France
| | - Pietro Addeo
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, University Hospitals of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Gilles Poncet
- Digestive and Oncologic Surgery, Edouard-Herriot University Hospital, Claude-Bernard Lyon 1 University, Lyon, France
| | - Frederic Sebag
- Endocrine Surgery, Conception University Hospital, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France
| | - Rachida Lebtahi
- Nuclear Medicine, ENETS Centre of Excellence, Beaujon Hospital, Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Bernard Goichot
- Diabetes and Metabolic Disorders, Internal Medicine, University Hospitals of Strasbourg, Strasbourg University, Strasbourg, France
| | - David Taïeb
- Nuclear Medicine, La Timone University Hospital, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France.,European Center for Research in Medical Imaging, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France; and
| | - Alessio Imperiale
- Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe, University Hospitals of Strasbourg, University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France; .,Molecular Imaging-DRHIM, IPHC, UMR 7178, CNRS/Unistra, Strasbourg, France
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Ma X, Ding Y, Li W, Li Q, Yang H. Diagnosis and management of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms by nuclear medicine: Update and future perspective. Front Oncol 2022; 12:1061065. [PMID: 36483036 PMCID: PMC9722972 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1061065] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2022] [Accepted: 11/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Gastrointestinal (GI) cancers are the second most common cause of cancer related deaths in the World. Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) is a rare tumor that originated from peptidergic neurons and neuroendocrine cells. NENs occurs in all parts of the body, especially in stomach, intestine, pancreas and lung. These rare tumors are challenging to diagnose at earlier stages because of their wide anatomical distribution and complex clinical features. Traditional imaging methods including magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) are mostly of useful for detection of larger primary tumors that are 1cm in size. A new medical imaging specialty called nuclear medicine uses radioactive substances for both diagnostic and therapeutic purposes. Nuclear medicine imaging relies on the tissue-specific uptake of radiolabeled tracers. Nuclear medicine techniques can easily identify the NENs tissues for their ability to absorb and concentrate amine, precursors, and peptides, whereas the traditional imaging methods are difficult to perform well. The somatostatin receptor (SSTR) is a targetable receptor frequently expressed in the gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs), and is a promising target for tumor-targeted therapies and radiography. SSTR based somatostatin receptor imaging and peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) has emerged as a new hot subject in the diagnosis and treatment of GEP-NENs due to the rapid development of somatostatin analogues (SSAs) and radionuclide. This review aims to provide an overview of the current status of nuclear medicine imaging modalities in the imaging of GEP-NENs, and puts them in perspective of clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Hui Yang
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Prosperi D, Gentiloni Silveri G, Panzuto F, Faggiano A, Russo VM, Caruso D, Polici M, Lauri C, Filice A, Laghi A, Signore A. Nuclear Medicine and Radiological Imaging of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: A Multidisciplinary Update. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11226836. [PMID: 36431313 PMCID: PMC9694730 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11226836] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2022] [Revised: 11/14/2022] [Accepted: 11/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (panNENs) are part of a large family of tumors arising from the neuroendocrine system. PanNENs show low-intermediate tumor grade and generally high somatostatin receptor (SSTR) expression. Therefore, panNENs benefit from functional imaging with 68Ga-somatostatin analogues (SSA) for diagnosis, staging, and treatment choice in parallel with morphological imaging. This narrative review aims to present conventional imaging techniques and new perspectives in the management of panNENs, providing the clinicians with useful insight for clinical practice. The 68Ga-SSA PET/CT is the most widely used in panNENs, not only fr diagnosis and staging purpose but also to characterize the biology of the tumor and its responsiveness to SSAs. On the contrary, the 18F-Fluordeoxiglucose (FDG) PET/CT is not employed systematically in all panNEN patients, being generally preferred in G2-G3, to predict aggressiveness and progression rate. The combination of 68Ga-SSA PET/CT and 18F-FDG PET/CT can finally suggest the best therapeutic strategy. Other radiopharmaceuticals are 68Ga-exendin-4 in case of insulinomas and 18F-dopamine (DOPA), which can be helpful in SSTR-negative tumors. New promising but still-under-investigation radiopharmaceuticals include radiolabeled SSTR antagonists and 18F-SSAs. Conventional imaging includes contrast enhanced CT and multiparametric MRI. There are now enriched by radiomics, a new non-invasive imaging approach, very promising to early predict tumor response or progression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniela Prosperi
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Medical-Surgical Sciences and of Translational Medicine, Sant’Andrea University Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, 00189 Roma, Italy
| | - Guido Gentiloni Silveri
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Medical-Surgical Sciences and of Translational Medicine, Sant’Andrea University Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, 00189 Roma, Italy
| | - Francesco Panzuto
- Digestive Disease Unit, Department of Medical-Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sant’Andrea University Hospital, ENETS Center of Excellence, Sapienza University of Rome, 00189 Roma, Italy
| | - Antongiulio Faggiano
- Endocrinology Unit, Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sant’Andrea University Hospital, ENETS Center of Excellence, Sapienza University of Rome, 00189 Roma, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Marcello Russo
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Medical-Surgical Sciences and of Translational Medicine, Sant’Andrea University Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, 00189 Roma, Italy
| | - Damiano Caruso
- Radiology Unit, Department of Medical Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sant’Andrea University Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, 00189 Roma, Italy
| | - Michela Polici
- Radiology Unit, Department of Medical Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sant’Andrea University Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, 00189 Roma, Italy
| | - Chiara Lauri
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Medical-Surgical Sciences and of Translational Medicine, Sant’Andrea University Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, 00189 Roma, Italy
- Correspondence:
| | - Angelina Filice
- Nucler Medicine Unit, AUSL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Andrea Laghi
- Radiology Unit, Department of Medical Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sant’Andrea University Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, 00189 Roma, Italy
| | - Alberto Signore
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Medical-Surgical Sciences and of Translational Medicine, Sant’Andrea University Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, 00189 Roma, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Poletto G, Cecchin D, Sperti S, Filippi L, Realdon N, Evangelista L. Head-to-Head Comparison between Peptide-Based Radiopharmaceutical for PET and SPECT in the Evaluation of Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Systematic Review. Curr Issues Mol Biol 2022; 44:5516-5530. [PMID: 36354685 PMCID: PMC9689511 DOI: 10.3390/cimb44110373] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2022] [Revised: 11/03/2022] [Accepted: 11/04/2022] [Indexed: 08/04/2023] Open
Abstract
We compared head-to-head the most used radiolabeled peptides for single photon computed emission tomography (SPECT) and positron emission tomography (PET) imaging of neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). A comprehensive literature search was performed in PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases. The following words, coupled two by two, were used: 68Ga-DOTATOC; 68Ga-DOTATATE; 68Ga-DOTANOC; 99mTc-EDDA/HYNIC-TOC; 64Cu-DOTATATE; and 111In-DTPA-octreotide. Moreover, a second-step search strategy was adopted by using the following combined terms: "Somatostatin receptor imaging,"; "Somatostatin receptor imaging" and "Functional,"; "Somatostatin receptor imaging" and "SPECT,"; and "Somatostatin receptor imaging" and "PET". Eligible criteria were: (1) original articles focusing on the clinical application of the radiopharmaceutical agents in NETs; (2) original articles in the English language; (3) comparative studies (head-to-head comparative or matched-paired studies). Editorials, letters to the editor, reviews, pictorial essays, clinical cases, or opinions were excluded. A total of 1077 articles were found in the three electronic databases. The full texts of 104 articles were assessed for eligibility. Nineteen articles were finally included. Most articles focused on the comparison between 111In-DTPA-Octreotide and 68Ga-DOTATOC/TATE. Few papers compared 64Cu-DOTATATE and 68Ga-DOTATOC/TATE, or SPECT tracers. The rates of true positivity were 63.7%, 58.5%, 78.4% and 82.4%, respectively, for 111In-DTPA-Octreotide, 99mTc-EDDA/HYNIC-TOC, 68Ga-DOTATATE/TOC and 64Cu-DOTATATE. In conclusion, as highly expected, PET tracers are more suitable for the in vivo identification of NETs. Indeed, in comparative studies, they demonstrated a higher true positive rate than SPECT agents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giulia Poletto
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Medicine DIMED, University of Padua, 35128 Padua, Italy
| | - Diego Cecchin
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Medicine DIMED, University of Padua, 35128 Padua, Italy
| | - Stefania Sperti
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Medicine DIMED, University of Padua, 35128 Padua, Italy
| | - Luca Filippi
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Santa Maria Goretti Hospital, 04100 Latina, Italy
| | - Nicola Realdon
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, University of Padua, 35131 Padua, Italy
| | - Laura Evangelista
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Medicine DIMED, University of Padua, 35128 Padua, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Lumbroso J. Functional imaging for evaluation of cancers and biologically conformal radiotherapy: Past-history and present-day perspectives. Presse Med 2022; 51:104124. [PMID: 35500752 DOI: 10.1016/j.lpm.2022.104124] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2021] [Revised: 02/17/2022] [Accepted: 04/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Over the past twenty years, nuclear medicine has enhanced the role of functional imaging in cancerology. A major milestone was achieved in the early 2000s with widespread availability of the positron emitter tracer 18F- deoxyglucose (FDG) and the introduction of hybrid imagers, i.e. positron imagers coupled with an X CT, providing anatomical landmarks and potently contributing to attenuation and scatter correction of the images. Other technical advances have progressively increased the quality of positron images. To date, the most widely used tracer remains FDG, which is highly beneficial in terms of sensitivity and specificity in detection of tumor sites, also providing biological information on tumors and early evaluation of treatment response for most cancers. Other highly specific tracers have been developed and are now routinely used for pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma, neuroendocrine tumors, and prostate cancer. Biological Radiotherapy has two aspects: Internal radiotherapy consisting in administration of a tumor-specific molecule radiolabeled with an isotope delivering an adequate radiation dose to the targeted tumor sites (on the model of thyroid cancer treated with radioiodine) and external radiotherapy designed to determine tumor volume, assess response and to dose radiation according to the tumor characteristics shown by functional imaging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jean Lumbroso
- Service de Médecine Nucléaire, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, 114, rue Édouard-Vaillant, Villejuif 94805 CEDEX, France.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Fargette C, Imperiale A, Taïeb D. Molecular imaging of endocrine neoplasms with emphasis on 18F-DOPA PET: a practical approach for well-tailored imaging protocols. THE QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING : OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE ITALIAN ASSOCIATION OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE (AIMN) [AND] THE INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF RADIOPHARMACOLOGY (IAR), [AND] SECTION OF THE SOCIETY OF... 2022; 66:141-147. [PMID: 35343670 DOI: 10.23736/s1824-4785.22.03450-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
6-[18F]-L-fluoro-L-3, 4-dihydroxyphenylalanine (18F-DOPA) PET/CT can be a useful tool for the detection of different neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). The main determinants of 18F-DOPA uptake and retention by NETs are related to expression of LAT1/LAT2 transporters, expression and activity of AADC and biochemical phenotype, all being intimately inter-connected to their embryological origin. In order to improve sensitivity of 18F-DOPA PET, it is of main importance to perform indivisualized imaging protocols across primaries. This review provides a practical approach for performing well-tailored imaging protocols and describes the clinical value of the recommended radiopharmaceuticals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christelle Fargette
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, CERIMED, La Timone University Hospital, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France
| | - Alessio Imperiale
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Institut de Cancérologie de Strasbourg Europe (ICANS), IPHC, UMR 7178, University Hospitals of Strasbourg, CNRS/University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - David Taïeb
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, CERIMED, La Timone University Hospital, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France -
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Diagnosis in Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: From Molecular Biology to Molecular Imaging. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14102514. [PMID: 35626118 PMCID: PMC9139608 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14102514] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2022] [Revised: 04/26/2022] [Accepted: 04/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Neuroendocrine neoplasms are a small group of malignancies with a diverse prognosis and behaviour. In order to offer an adequate treatment, physicians need to perform a proper diagnosis, staging and stratification. This review aims to help to integrate the information from pathology, immunohistochemistry, molecular biology and imaging to guide this process. Abstract Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are a heterogeneous group of tumours with a diverse behaviour, biology and prognosis, whose incidence is gradually increasing. Their diagnosis is challenging and a multidisciplinary approach is often required. The combination of pathology, molecular biomarkers, and the use of novel imaging techniques leads to an accurate diagnosis and a better treatment approach. To determine the functionality of the tumour, somatostatin receptor expression, differentiation, and primary tumour origin are the main determining tumour-dependent factors to guide treatment, both in local and metastatic stages. Until recently, little was known about the biological behaviour of these tumours. However, in recent years, many advances have been achieved in the molecular characterization and diagnosis of NENs. The incorporation of novel radiotracer-based imaging techniques, such as 68Gallium-DOTATATE PET-CT, has significantly increased diagnostic sensitivity, while introducing the theragnosis concept, offering new treatment strategies. Here, we will review current knowledge and novelties in the diagnosis of NENs, including molecular biology, pathology, and new radiotracers.
Collapse
|
18
|
El Ghannudi S, Ouvrard E, Mikail N, Leroy Freschini B, Schindler TH, Imperiale A. Cutting-Edge Imaging of Cardiac Metastases from Neuroendocrine Tumors: Lesson from a Case Series. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022; 12:diagnostics12051182. [PMID: 35626337 PMCID: PMC9139778 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12051182] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2022] [Revised: 05/05/2022] [Accepted: 05/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
With the increasing availability of high-performance medical imaging for the management of patients with neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), a progressive growth of asymptomatic and incidentally detected cardiac metastases (CMs) has been observed in the recent years. In clinical practice, CMs of NENs are often incidentally detected by whole-body 68Ga-labeled somatostatin analogs or 18F-fluorodihydroxyphenylalanine positron emission tomography/computed tomography, and afterwards accurately characterized by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) and/or gated cardiac computed tomography when CMR is contraindicated or not available. The interpreting physician should familiarize with the main imaging features of CM, a finding that may be encountered in NETs patients more than previously thought. Herein, we present a case series of four patients with CMs from small-intestine NETs highlighting strengths and weaknesses of a multimodality imaging approach in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Soraya El Ghannudi
- Nuclear Medicine, Institut de Cancérologie de Strasbourg Europe (ICANS), University Hospitals of Strasbourg, 67093 Strasbourg, France; (E.O.); (B.L.F.)
- Department of Radiology, University Hospitals of Strasbourg, 67098 Strasbourg, France
- Correspondence: (S.E.G.); (A.I.)
| | - Eric Ouvrard
- Nuclear Medicine, Institut de Cancérologie de Strasbourg Europe (ICANS), University Hospitals of Strasbourg, 67093 Strasbourg, France; (E.O.); (B.L.F.)
| | - Nidaa Mikail
- Nuclear Medicine, ENETS Centre of Excellence, Beaujon Hospital (APHP), 92110 Clichy, France;
| | - Benjamin Leroy Freschini
- Nuclear Medicine, Institut de Cancérologie de Strasbourg Europe (ICANS), University Hospitals of Strasbourg, 67093 Strasbourg, France; (E.O.); (B.L.F.)
| | - Thomas H. Schindler
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA;
| | - Alessio Imperiale
- Nuclear Medicine, Institut de Cancérologie de Strasbourg Europe (ICANS), University Hospitals of Strasbourg, 67093 Strasbourg, France; (E.O.); (B.L.F.)
- Molecular Imaging—DRHIM, IPHC, UMR 7178, CNRS/Unistra, 67093 Strasbourg, France
- Correspondence: (S.E.G.); (A.I.)
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Vahidfar N, Farzanehfar S, Abbasi M, Mirzaei S, Delpassand ES, Abbaspour F, Salehi Y, Biersack HJ, Ahmadzadehfar H. Diagnostic Value of Radiolabelled Somatostatin Analogues for Neuroendocrine Tumour Diagnosis: The Benefits and Drawbacks of [ 64Cu]Cu-DOTA-TOC. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:1914. [PMID: 35454822 PMCID: PMC9027354 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14081914] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2022] [Revised: 04/07/2022] [Accepted: 04/08/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) arise from secondary epithelial cell lines in the gastrointestinal or respiratory system organs. The rate of development of these tumours varies from an indolent to an aggressive course, typically being initially asymptomatic. The identification of these tumours is difficult, particularly because the primary tumour is often small and undetectable by conventional anatomical imaging. Consequently, diagnosis of NETs is complicated and has been a significant challenge until recently. In the last 30 years, the advent of novel nuclear medicine diagnostic procedures has led to a substantial increase in NET detection. Great varieties of exclusive single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and positron emission tomography (PET) radiopharmaceuticals for detecting NETs are being applied successfully in clinical settings, including [111In]In-pentetreotide, [99mTc]Tc-HYNIC-TOC/TATE, [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE, and [64Cu]Cu-DOTA-TOC/TATE. Among these tracers for functional imaging, PET radiopharmaceuticals are clearly and substantially superior to planar or SPECT imaging radiopharmaceuticals. The main advantages include higher resolution, better sensitivity and increased lesion-to-background uptake. An advantage of diagnosis with a radiopharmaceutical is the capacity of theranostics to provide concomitant diagnosis and treatment with particulate radionuclides, such as beta and alpha emitters including Lutetium-177 (177Lu) and Actinium-225 (225Ac). Due to these unique challenges involved with diagnosing NETs, various PET tracers have been developed. This review compares the clinical characteristics of radiolabelled somatostatin analogues for NET diagnosis, focusing on the most recently FDA-approved [64Cu]Cu-DOTA-TATE as a state-of-the art NET-PET/CT radiopharmaceutical.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nasim Vahidfar
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Vali-Asr Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran 1419733133, Iran; (N.V.); (S.F.); (M.A.); (Y.S.)
| | - Saeed Farzanehfar
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Vali-Asr Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran 1419733133, Iran; (N.V.); (S.F.); (M.A.); (Y.S.)
| | - Mehrshad Abbasi
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Vali-Asr Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran 1419733133, Iran; (N.V.); (S.F.); (M.A.); (Y.S.)
| | - Siroos Mirzaei
- Clinic Ottakring, Institute of Nuclear Medicine with PET-Center, 1220 Vienna, Austria;
| | - Ebrahim S. Delpassand
- RadioMedix, Inc., Houston, TX 77041, USA;
- Excel Diagnostics and Nuclear Oncology Center, Houston, TX 77042, USA
| | - Farzad Abbaspour
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Medicine, The Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L6, Canada;
| | - Yalda Salehi
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Vali-Asr Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran 1419733133, Iran; (N.V.); (S.F.); (M.A.); (Y.S.)
| | - Hans Jürgen Biersack
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany;
- Betaklinik Bonn, 53227 Bonn, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Ambrosini V, Zanoni L, Filice A, Lamberti G, Argalia G, Fortunati E, Campana D, Versari A, Fanti S. Radiolabeled Somatostatin Analogues for Diagnosis and Treatment of Neuroendocrine Tumors. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:1055. [PMID: 35205805 PMCID: PMC8870358 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14041055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2021] [Revised: 02/10/2022] [Accepted: 02/17/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are rare and heterogeneous tumors that require multidisciplinary discussion for optimal care. The theranostic approach (DOTA peptides labelled with 68Ga for diagnosis and with 90Y or 177Lu for therapy) plays a crucial role in the management of NENs to assess disease extension and as a criteria for peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) eligibility based on somatostatin receptor (SSTR) expression. On the diagnostic side, [68Ga]Ga-DOTA peptides PET/CT (SSTR PET/CT) is the gold standard for imaging well-differentiated SSTR-expressing neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). [18F]FDG PET/CT is useful in higher grade NENs (NET G2 with Ki-67 > 10% and NET G3; NEC) for more accurate disease characterization and prognostication. Promising emerging radiopharmaceuticals include somatostatin analogues labelled with 18F (to overcome the limits imposed by 68Ga), and SSTR antagonists (for both diagnosis and therapy). On the therapeutic side, the evidence gathered over the past two decades indicates that PRRT is to be considered as an effective and safe treatment option for SSTR-expressing NETs, and is currently included in the therapeutic algorithms of the main scientific societies. The positioning of PRRT in the treatment sequence, as well as treatment personalization (e.g., tailored dosimetry, re-treatment, selection criteria, and combination with other alternative treatment options), is warranted in order to improve its efficacy while reducing toxicity. Although very preliminary (being mostly hampered by lack of methodological standardization, especially regarding feature selection/extraction) and often including small patient cohorts, radiomic studies in NETs are also presented. To date, the implementation of radiomics in clinical practice is still unclear. The purpose of this review is to offer an overview of radiolabeled SSTR analogues for theranostic use in NENs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valentina Ambrosini
- Department of Experimental Diagnostic and Specialized Medicine, University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (V.A.); (G.L.); (G.A.); (E.F.); (D.C.); (S.F.)
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Lucia Zanoni
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Angelina Filice
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy; (A.F.); (A.V.)
| | - Giuseppe Lamberti
- Department of Experimental Diagnostic and Specialized Medicine, University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (V.A.); (G.L.); (G.A.); (E.F.); (D.C.); (S.F.)
- Division of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Giulia Argalia
- Department of Experimental Diagnostic and Specialized Medicine, University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (V.A.); (G.L.); (G.A.); (E.F.); (D.C.); (S.F.)
| | - Emilia Fortunati
- Department of Experimental Diagnostic and Specialized Medicine, University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (V.A.); (G.L.); (G.A.); (E.F.); (D.C.); (S.F.)
| | - Davide Campana
- Department of Experimental Diagnostic and Specialized Medicine, University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (V.A.); (G.L.); (G.A.); (E.F.); (D.C.); (S.F.)
- Division of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Annibale Versari
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy; (A.F.); (A.V.)
| | - Stefano Fanti
- Department of Experimental Diagnostic and Specialized Medicine, University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (V.A.); (G.L.); (G.A.); (E.F.); (D.C.); (S.F.)
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Cazzato RL, Hubelé F, De Marini P, Ouvrard E, Salvadori J, Addeo P, Garnon J, Kurtz JE, Greget M, Mertz L, Goichot B, Gangi A, Imperiale A. Liver-Directed Therapy for Neuroendocrine Metastases: From Interventional Radiology to Nuclear Medicine Procedures. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13246368. [PMID: 34944988 PMCID: PMC8699378 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13246368] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2021] [Revised: 12/16/2021] [Accepted: 12/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are rare and heterogeneous epithelial tumors most commonly arising from the gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) system. GEP-NENs account for approximately 60% of all NENs, and the small intestine and pancreas represent two most common sites of primary tumor development. Approximately 80% of metastatic patients have secondary liver lesions, and in approximately 50% of patients, the liver is the only metastatic site. The therapeutic strategy depends on the degree of hepatic metastatic invasion, ranging from liver surgery or percutaneous ablation to palliative treatments to reduce both tumor volume and secretion. In patients with grade 1 and 2 NENs, locoregional nonsurgical treatments of liver metastases mainly include percutaneous ablation and endovascular treatments, targeting few or multiple hepatic metastases, respectively. In the present work, we provide a narrative review of the current knowledge on liver-directed therapy for metastasis treatment, including both interventional radiology procedures and nuclear medicine options in NEN patients, taking into account the patient clinical context and both the strengths and limitations of each modality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roberto Luigi Cazzato
- Interventional Radiology, University Hospitals of Strasbourg, Strasbourg University, 67000 Strasbourg, France; (R.L.C.); (P.D.M.); (J.G.); (M.G.); (A.G.)
- Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de Strasbourg Europe (ICANS), Strasbourg University, 67200 Strasbourg, France;
| | - Fabrice Hubelé
- Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Institut de Cancérologie de Strasbourg Europe (ICANS), University Hospitals of Strasbourg, Strasbourg University, 67200 Strasbourg, France; (F.H.); (E.O.)
| | - Pierre De Marini
- Interventional Radiology, University Hospitals of Strasbourg, Strasbourg University, 67000 Strasbourg, France; (R.L.C.); (P.D.M.); (J.G.); (M.G.); (A.G.)
| | - Eric Ouvrard
- Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Institut de Cancérologie de Strasbourg Europe (ICANS), University Hospitals of Strasbourg, Strasbourg University, 67200 Strasbourg, France; (F.H.); (E.O.)
| | - Julien Salvadori
- Radiophysics, Institut de Cancérologie de Strasbourg Europe (ICANS), 67200 Strasbourg, France;
| | - Pietro Addeo
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, University Hospitals of Strasbourg, 67200 Strasbourg, France;
| | - Julien Garnon
- Interventional Radiology, University Hospitals of Strasbourg, Strasbourg University, 67000 Strasbourg, France; (R.L.C.); (P.D.M.); (J.G.); (M.G.); (A.G.)
| | - Jean-Emmanuel Kurtz
- Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de Strasbourg Europe (ICANS), Strasbourg University, 67200 Strasbourg, France;
| | - Michel Greget
- Interventional Radiology, University Hospitals of Strasbourg, Strasbourg University, 67000 Strasbourg, France; (R.L.C.); (P.D.M.); (J.G.); (M.G.); (A.G.)
| | - Luc Mertz
- Radiophysics, University Hospitals of Strasbourg, 67000 Strasbourg, France;
| | - Bernard Goichot
- Internal Medicine, Diabetes and Metabolic Disorders, University Hospitals of Strasbourg, Strasbourg University, 67200 Strasbourg, France;
| | - Afshin Gangi
- Interventional Radiology, University Hospitals of Strasbourg, Strasbourg University, 67000 Strasbourg, France; (R.L.C.); (P.D.M.); (J.G.); (M.G.); (A.G.)
- School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Science, King’s College London, Strand, London WC2R 2LS, UK
| | - Alessio Imperiale
- Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Institut de Cancérologie de Strasbourg Europe (ICANS), University Hospitals of Strasbourg, Strasbourg University, 67200 Strasbourg, France; (F.H.); (E.O.)
- Molecular Imaging—DRHIM, IPHC, UMR 7178, CNRS/Unistra, 67037 Strasbourg, France
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +33-3-68-76-74-48; Fax: +33-3-68-76-72-56
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Treglia G, Sadeghi R, Giovinazzo F, Galiandro F, Annunziata S, Muoio B, Kroiss AS. PET with Different Radiopharmaceuticals in Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: An Umbrella Review of Published Meta-Analyses. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13205172. [PMID: 34680321 PMCID: PMC8533943 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13205172] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2021] [Revised: 10/03/2021] [Accepted: 10/11/2021] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Functional imaging methods and, in particular, positron emission tomography (PET) using several radiopharmaceuticals may play a pivotal role in patients with neuroendocrine neoplasms including neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) located in different sites, paraganglioma (PGL) and neuroblastoma (NB), recurrent medullary thyroid carcinoma (rMTC) and aggressive neuroendocrine neoplasms. Several radiopharmaceuticals can be used in this setting such as Gallium-68 somatostatin analogues (68Ga-SSA), Fluorine-18 fluorodihydroxyphenylalanine (18F-FDOPA), Gallium-68 exendin-4 (68Ga-exendin-4), Fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG). This umbrella review provides an evidence-based summary about meta-analyses on diagnostic performance, prognostic value, clinical impact and safety of PET with different radiopharmaceuticals in patients with neuroendocrine neoplasms. Overall, evidence-based data support the use of PET with different radiopharmaceuticals in patients with neuroendocrine neoplasms but with specific indications for each radiopharmaceutical. Abstract Background: Several meta-analyses have reported quantitative data about the diagnostic performance, the prognostic value, the impact on management and the safety of positron emission tomography (PET) including related hybrid modalities (PET/CT or PET/MRI) using different radiopharmaceuticals in patients with neuroendocrine neoplasms. We performed an umbrella review of published meta-analyses to provide an evidence-based summary. Methods: A comprehensive literature search of meta-analyses listed in PubMed/MEDLINE and Cochrane Library databases was carried out (last search date: 30 June 2021). Results: Thirty-four published meta-analyses were selected and summarized. About the diagnostic performance: 68Ga-SSA PET yields high diagnostic performance in patients with NETs and PGL; 18F-FDOPA PET yields good diagnostic performance in patients with intestinal NETs, PGL, NB, being the best available PET method in detecting rMTC; 68Ga-exendin-4 PET has good diagnostic accuracy in detecting insulinomas; 18F-FDG PET has good diagnostic performance in detecting aggressive neuroendocrine neoplasms. About the prognostic value: 68Ga-SSA PET has a recognized prognostic value in well-differentiated NETs, whereas 18F-FDG PET has a recognized prognostic value in aggressive neuroendocrine neoplasms. A significant clinical impact of 68Ga-SSA PET and related hybrid modalities in patients with NETs was demonstrated. There are no major toxicities or safety issues related to the use of PET radiopharmaceuticals in patients with neuroendocrine neoplasms. Conclusions: Evidence-based data support the use of PET with different radiopharmaceuticals in patients with neuroendocrine neoplasms with specific indications for each radiopharmaceutical.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giorgio Treglia
- Clinic of Nuclear Medicine, Imaging Institute of Southern Switzerland, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, 6500 Bellinzona, Switzerland
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Lausanne University Hospital, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland
- Academic Education, Research and Innovation Area, General Directorate, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, 6500 Bellinzona, Switzerland
- Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland
- Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Università della Svizzera italiana, 6900 Lugano, Switzerland
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +41-(91)-8118919
| | - Ramin Sadeghi
- Nuclear Medicine Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad 9919991766, Iran;
| | - Francesco Giovinazzo
- Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy; (F.G.); (F.G.)
| | - Federica Galiandro
- Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy; (F.G.); (F.G.)
| | - Salvatore Annunziata
- UOC Medicina Nucleare, TracerGLab, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy;
| | - Barbara Muoio
- Department of Medicine and Oncology, Institute of Southern Switzerland, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, 6500 Bellinzona, Switzerland;
| | | |
Collapse
|