1
|
Zuffardi O, Fichera M, Bonaglia MC. The embryo battle against adverse genomes: Are de novo terminal deletions the rescue of unfavorable zygotic imbalances? Eur J Med Genet 2022; 65:104532. [PMID: 35724817 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmg.2022.104532] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2021] [Revised: 04/02/2022] [Accepted: 05/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
De novo distal deletions are structural variants considered to be already present in the zygote. However, investigations especially in the prenatal setting have documented that they are often in mosaic with cell lines in which the same deleted chromosome shows different types of aberrations such as: 1) neutral copy variants with loss of heterozygosity that replace the deleted region with equivalent portions of the homologous chromosome and create distal uniparental disomy (UPD); 2) derivative chromosomes where the deleted one ends with the distal region of another chromosome or has the shape of a ring; 3) U-type mirror dicentric or inv-dup del rearrangements. Unstable dicentrics had already been entailed as causative of terminal deletions even when no trace of the reciprocal inv-dup del had been detected. To clarify the mechanism of origin of distal deletions, we examined PubMed using as keywords: complex/mosaic chromosomal deletions, distal UPD, U-type dicentrics, inv-dup del chromosomes, excluding the recurrent inv-dup del(8p)s which are known to originate by NAHR at the maternal meiosis. The literature has shown that U-type dicentrics leading to nearly complete trisomy and therefore incompatible with zygotic survival underlie many types of de novo unbalanced rearrangements, including terminal deletions. In the early embryo, the position of the postzygotic breaks of the dicentric, the different ways of acquiring telomeres by the broken portions and the selection of the most favorable cell lines in the different tissues determine the prevalence of one or the other rearrangement. Multiple lines with simple terminal deletions, inv-dup dels, unbalanced translocations and segmental UPDs can coexist in various mosaic combinations although it is rare to identify them all in the blood. Regarding the origin of the dicentric, among the 30 cases of non-recurrent inv-dup del with sufficient genotyping information, paternal origin was markedly prevalent with consistently identical polymorphisms within the duplication region, regardless of parental origin. The non-random parental origin made any postzygotic origin unlikely and suggested the occurrence of these dicentrics mainly in spermatogenesis. This study strengthens the evidence that non-recurrent de novo structural rearrangements are often secondary to the rescue of a zygotic genome incompatible with embryo survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Orsetta Zuffardi
- Department of Molecular Medicine, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
| | - Marco Fichera
- Department of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences, Medical Genetics, University of Catania, Catania, Italy; Oasi Research Institute-IRCCS, Troina, Italy.
| | - Maria Clara Bonaglia
- Cytogenetics Laboratory, Scientific Institute, IRCCS Eugenio Medea, Bosisio Parini, Lecco, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Papenhausen PR, Kelly CA, Harris S, Caldwell S, Schwartz S, Penton A. Clinical significance and mechanisms associated with segmental UPD. Mol Cytogenet 2021; 14:38. [PMID: 34284807 PMCID: PMC8290618 DOI: 10.1186/s13039-021-00555-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2021] [Accepted: 06/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Whole chromosome uniparental disomy (UPD) has been well documented with mechanisms largely understood. However, the etiology of segmental limited UPD (segUPD) is not as clear. In a 10-year period of confirming (> 300) cases of whole chromosome UPD, we identified 86 segmental cases in both prenatal and postnatal samples. Thirty-two of these cases showed mosaic segmental UPD at 11p due to somatic selection associated with Beckwith–Wiedemann syndrome. This study focuses on apparent mechanisms associated with the remaining cases, many of which appear to represent corrections of genomic imbalance such as deletions and derivative chromosomes. In some cases, segmental UPD was associated with the generation of additional genomic imbalance while in others it apparently resulted in restoration of euploidy. Multiple tests utilizing noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT), chorionic villus sampling (CVS) and amniotic fluid samples from the same pregnancy revealed temporal evidence of correction and a “hotspot” at 1p. Although in many cases the genomic imbalance was dosage “repaired” in the analyzed tissue, clinical effects could be sustained due to early developmental effects of the original imbalance or due to its continued existence in other tissues. In addition, if correction did not occur in the gametes there would be recurrence risks for the offspring of those individuals. Familial microarray allele patterns are presented that differentiate lack of gamete correction from somatic derived gonadal mosaicism. These results suggest that the incidence of segUPD mediated correction is underestimated and may explain the etiology of some clinical phenotypes which are undetected by routine microarray analysis and many exome sequencing studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter R Papenhausen
- Cytogenetics Department, Laboratory Corporation of America, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27709, USA
| | - Carla A Kelly
- Cytogenetics Department, Laboratory Corporation of America, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27709, USA
| | - Samuel Harris
- Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
| | - Samantha Caldwell
- Cytogenetics Department, Laboratory Corporation of America, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27709, USA
| | - Stuart Schwartz
- Cytogenetics Department, Laboratory Corporation of America, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27709, USA
| | - Andrea Penton
- Cytogenetics Department, Laboratory Corporation of America, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27709, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Blanluet M, Chantot-Bastaraud S, Chambon P, Cassinari K, Vera G, Goldenberg A, Keren B, Le Meur N, Hannequin D, Mace B, Siffroi JP, Frebourg T, Nicolas G, Joly-Helas G. Recurrence of an early postzygotic rescue of an inherited unbalanced translocation resulting in mosaic segmental uniparental isodisomy of chromosome 11q in siblings. Am J Med Genet A 2021; 185:3057-3061. [PMID: 34043868 DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.62361] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2020] [Revised: 04/10/2021] [Accepted: 04/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
Balanced translocations are associated with a risk of transmission of unbalanced chromosomal rearrangements in the offspring. Such inherited chromosomal abnormalities are typically non-mosaic as they are present in the germline. We report the recurrence in two siblings of a mosaicism for a chromosomal rearrangement inherited from their asymptomatic father who carried a balanced t(2;11)(q35;q25) translocation. Both siblings exhibited a similar phenotype including intellectual disability, dysmorphic features, kyphoscoliosis, and cervical spinal stenosis. Karyotyping, fluorescence in situ hybridization and SNP array analysis of blood lymphocytes of both siblings identified two cell lines: one carrying a 2q35q37.3 duplication and a 11q25qter deletion (~90% cells), and one carrying an 11q uniparental isodisomy of maternal origin (~10% cells). We hypothesize that these mosaics were related to a postzygotic rescue mechanism which unexpectedly recurred in both siblings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maud Blanluet
- Normandie Univ, UNIROUEN, Inserm U1245, CHU Rouen, Department of Genetics and reference center for developmental disorders, FHU G4 Génomique, F-76000, Rouen, France
| | - Sandra Chantot-Bastaraud
- Department of Medical Genetics and Embryology, Armand-Trousseau Children Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France
| | - Pascal Chambon
- Normandie Univ, UNIROUEN, Inserm U1245, CHU Rouen, Department of Genetics and reference center for developmental disorders, FHU G4 Génomique, F-76000, Rouen, France
| | - Kévin Cassinari
- Normandie Univ, UNIROUEN, Inserm U1245, CHU Rouen, Department of Genetics and reference center for developmental disorders, FHU G4 Génomique, F-76000, Rouen, France
| | - Gabriella Vera
- Normandie Univ, UNIROUEN, Inserm U1245, CHU Rouen, Department of Genetics and reference center for developmental disorders, FHU G4 Génomique, F-76000, Rouen, France
| | - Alice Goldenberg
- Normandie Univ, UNIROUEN, Inserm U1245, CHU Rouen, Department of Genetics and reference center for developmental disorders, FHU G4 Génomique, F-76000, Rouen, France
| | - Boris Keren
- Genetics Department, La Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France
| | - Nathalie Le Meur
- Normandie Univ, UNIROUEN, Inserm U1245, CHU Rouen, Department of Genetics and reference center for developmental disorders, FHU G4 Génomique, F-76000, Rouen, France
| | - Didier Hannequin
- Normandie Univ, UNIROUEN, Inserm U1245, CHU Rouen, Department of Genetics and reference center for developmental disorders, FHU G4 Génomique, F-76000, Rouen, France
| | - Bertrand Mace
- Normandie Univ, UNIROUEN, Inserm U1245, CHU Rouen, Department of Genetics and reference center for developmental disorders, FHU G4 Génomique, F-76000, Rouen, France
| | - Jean-Pierre Siffroi
- Department of Medical Genetics and Embryology, Armand-Trousseau Children Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France
| | - Thierry Frebourg
- Normandie Univ, UNIROUEN, Inserm U1245, CHU Rouen, Department of Genetics and reference center for developmental disorders, FHU G4 Génomique, F-76000, Rouen, France
| | - Gaël Nicolas
- Normandie Univ, UNIROUEN, Inserm U1245, CHU Rouen, Department of Genetics and reference center for developmental disorders, FHU G4 Génomique, F-76000, Rouen, France
| | - Géraldine Joly-Helas
- Normandie Univ, UNIROUEN, Inserm U1245, CHU Rouen, Department of Genetics and reference center for developmental disorders, FHU G4 Génomique, F-76000, Rouen, France
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Caldwell S, Sagaser K, Nelson Z, Frey J, Wardrop J, Boomer T, McCullough R, Schwartz S. Deletion rescue resulting in segmental homozygosity: A mechanism underlying discordant NIPT results. Am J Med Genet A 2020; 182:2666-2670. [PMID: 32798301 DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.61801] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2020] [Revised: 06/29/2020] [Accepted: 07/04/2020] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
With the increasing capabilities of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT), detection of sub-chromosomal deletions and duplications are possible. This case series of deletion rescues resulting in segmental homozygosity helps provide a biological explanation for NIPT discrepancies and adds to the dearth of existing literature surrounding segmental UPD cases and their underlying mechanisms. In the three cases presented here, NIPT reported a sub-chromosomal deletion (in isolation or as part of a complex finding). Diagnostic testing, however, revealed segmental homozygosity or UPD for the region reported deleted on NIPT. Postnatal placental testing was pursued in two cases and confirmed the NIPT findings. This discordance between the screening and diagnostic testing is suggestive of a corrective post-zygotic event, such as telomere capture and/or deletion rescue, ultimately resulting in segmental homozygosity and fetoplacental mosaicism. Imprinted chromosomes and autosomal recessive disease genes make homozygosity an important clinical consideration. Amniocentesis with SNP microarray is particularly useful in determining both copy number and UPD issues alike.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Katelynn Sagaser
- Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Zoe Nelson
- Mount Sinai West Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Jennifer Frey
- Division of Medical Genetics, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| | | | | | | | - Stuart Schwartz
- Cytogenetics Laboratory, Laboratory Corporation of America® Holdings, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kawai M, Tsutsumi M, Suzuki F, Sameshima K, Dowa Y, Kyoya T, Inagaki H, Kurahashi H. Two siblings with 11qter deletion syndrome that had been rescued in their mother by uniparental disomy. Eur J Med Genet 2018; 62:224-228. [PMID: 30031150 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmg.2018.07.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2018] [Revised: 06/12/2018] [Accepted: 07/17/2018] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
Jacobsen syndrome refers to a congenital anomaly caused by deletion at 11q23.3-qter. We here describe two siblings with the same 11q23.3-qter deletion. Both parents were healthy with a normal karyotype. Cytogenetic microarray analysis revealed no mosaicism in either parent but the mother showed uniparental disomy encompassing the deleted region found in the two siblings. The pattern of X chromosome inactivation was almost completely skewed in the mother. These data suggested that the mother was a carrier of the 11q23.3-qter deletion but that this had been rescued by disomy formation during early embryogenesis except for her germinal cells.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miki Kawai
- Division of Molecular Genetics, Institute for Comprehensive Medical Science, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Japan
| | - Makiko Tsutsumi
- Division of Molecular Genetics, Institute for Comprehensive Medical Science, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Japan
| | - Fumihiko Suzuki
- Division of Molecular Genetics, Institute for Comprehensive Medical Science, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Japan; Center for Collaboration in Research and Education, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Japan
| | - Kiyoko Sameshima
- Department of Pediatrics, Minamikyushu National Hospital, Aira, Japan
| | - Yuri Dowa
- Department of Neurology, Gunma Children's Medical Center, Shibukawa, Japan
| | - Takuji Kyoya
- Department of Obstetrics, Gunma Children's Medical Center, Shibukawa, Japan
| | - Hidehito Inagaki
- Division of Molecular Genetics, Institute for Comprehensive Medical Science, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Japan; Genome and Transcriptome Analysis Center, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Japan
| | - Hiroki Kurahashi
- Division of Molecular Genetics, Institute for Comprehensive Medical Science, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Japan; Center for Collaboration in Research and Education, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Japan; Genome and Transcriptome Analysis Center, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kovaleva NV, Cotter PD. Mosaicism for structural non-centromeric autosomal rearrangements in disease-defined carriers: sex differences in the rearrangements profile and maternal age distributions. Mol Cytogenet 2017; 10:18. [PMID: 28533817 PMCID: PMC5438540 DOI: 10.1186/s13039-017-0321-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2017] [Accepted: 05/13/2017] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Mosaicism for an autosomal structural rearrangement (Rea) associated with clinical manifestation of chromosomal imbalance is rare. Consequently, there is a lack of basic epidemiological characterization of this kind of mosaicism, such as population rate, cytogenetic profile of Reas involved, maternal age distribution, and sex (male to female) ratio among Rea carriers. The objectives of the present study were: (i) determination of the Rea profile in clinically affected individuals, (ii) comparative analysis of the cytogenetic profile and involvement of single chromosomes to rearrangements in affected and previously reported asymptomatic carriers, (iii) analysis of the male/female ratio in carriers of various types of Rea, and, (iv) examination of parental ages distributions according to carriers’ sex. Results Two hundred and forty six disease-defined cases of mosaicism for autosomal non-centromeric Rea with a normal cell line of known sex were identified from the literature. There was a significant difference in single chromosome involvements compared to structural rearrangements between affected and asymptomatic carriers of unbalanced Rea, p =0.0030. In affected carriers, chromosome 18 was most frequently involved in structural rearrangements (12.6% of 246 instances). The least frequently rearranged were chromosomes 16 and 21 (0.8% and 1.2%, respectively). In asymptomatic carriers, the most frequently rearranged were chromosomes 5 and 21 (13% of 51 instances each). Among carriers of “loss” or “gain/loss” of genomic material, a female predominance was observed (50 M/89 F, different from population ratio of 1.06 at p = 0.0002). Carriers of either “gain” or balanced Rea demonstrated typical male predominance (41 M/30 F and 18 M/16 F), not different from 1.06. Maternal and paternal ages were reported in 129 and in 109 cases, respectively. There was a significant difference in maternal age distribution between male and female carriers, with mean maternal age of 25.2 years vs 28.3 years (p = 0.032). However, there was no difference in paternal age, with mean paternal age of 29.4 in both groups. Conclusion The data suggested that structural rearrangements of certain chromosomes involved in mosaicism may not be tolerated by the embryo, while others have higher survival prospects. Maternal age appears to be a risk factor for somatic mosaicism of structural Rea in female offspring or might cause an adverse effect on male embryo viability. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13039-017-0321-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalia V Kovaleva
- Academy of Molecular Medicine, Mytniskaya str. 12/44, St. Petersburg, 191144 Russian Federation
| | - Philip D Cotter
- Department of Pediatrics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA USA.,ResearchDx Inc., Irvine, CA USA
| |
Collapse
|