1
|
Arulogun O, Nichols M, Jenkins C, Fakunle AG, Akpa O, Sarfo FS, Akpalu A, Wahab K, Obiako R, Komolafe M, Owolabi L, Osaigbovo GO, Okekunle AP, Akinyemi J, Ogbole G, Calys-Tagoe B, Adeleye A, Mensah Y, Asowata OJ, Adeoye AM, Appiah L, Singh A, Adebayo P, Arnett D, Tiwari HK, Lackland D, Ibinaiye P, Oguike W, Melikam C, Sunday A, Bello A, Ogah O, Akinyemi R, Ovbiagele B, Owolabi M. Are there differences in perceptions, preferences and attitudes towards disclosure of genetic testing for Stroke? A qualitative study among stroke-free SIREN-SIBS genomics study participants. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2023; 32:106978. [PMID: 36634397 PMCID: PMC9928805 DOI: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2023.106978] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2022] [Revised: 12/30/2022] [Accepted: 01/04/2023] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study explored perceptions, preferences and attitudes towards disclosure of genetic testing results for stroke among stroke-free controls (and their family members) in the SIREN-SIBS Genomics Study, healthcare providers and policymakers. MATERIALS AND METHODS We conducted a qualitative thematic analysis of key informant interviews with 61 participants recruited from community advisory boards (30) and health care providers (31) across seven sites in Nigeria and Ghana. RESULTS Major findings illustrate differences in the knowledge of genetic testing with superior knowledge among health care professionals. Relatives and religious leaders were opined as the best to receive the disclosure as they would be able to break the news to the patient in a culturally sensitive manner to reduce the likely resultant emotional outburst. Poor level of awareness of national guidelines for disclosing genetic results exist. Key facilitating factors for disclosure are education, enabling environment, involvement of religious and community leaders, campaigns, and possible treatment options. Disclosure inhibitors include inadequate information, fear of marital break-up or family displacement, fear of stigmatization, fear of isolation, religious beliefs, health worker attitude, and lack of preparedness to accept results. CONCLUSIONS These necessitate culturally sensitive interventions for continuing education, increased awareness and sustained engagement to equip all stakeholders in genetic testing disclosure process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oyedunni Arulogun
- Department of Health Promotion and Education, University of Ibadan, Nigeria
| | - Michelle Nichols
- College of Nursing, Medical University of South Carolina, South Carolina, USA
| | - Carolyn Jenkins
- College of Nursing, Medical University of South Carolina, South Carolina, USA
| | - Adekunle Gregory Fakunle
- Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan, Nigeria; Department of Public Health, Osun State University, Osogbo, Nigeria
| | - Onoja Akpa
- Department of Epidemiology and Medical Statistics, University of Ibadan, Nigeria; Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan, Nigeria
| | - Fred S Sarfo
- Department of Medicine, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Ghana
| | - Albert Akpalu
- Department of Medicine, University of Ghana Medical School, Accra, Ghana
| | - Kolawole Wahab
- Department of Medicine, University of Ilorin Teaching Hospital, Ilorin, Nigeria
| | - Reginald Obiako
- Department of Medicine, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Nigeria
| | - Morenikeji Komolafe
- Department of Medicine, Obafemi Awolowo University Teaching Hospital, Ile-Ife, Nigeria
| | - Lukman Owolabi
- Department of Medicine, Aminu Kano Teaching Hospital, Kano, Nigeria
| | | | - Akinkunmi Paul Okekunle
- Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan, Nigeria; Department of Food and Nutrition, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Joshua Akinyemi
- Department of Epidemiology and Medical Statistics, University of Ibadan, Nigeria
| | - Godwin Ogbole
- Department of Radiology, University of Ibadan, Nigeria
| | | | - Adeniji Adeleye
- Department of Medicine, Federal Medical Centre, Abeokuta, Nigeria
| | - Yaw Mensah
- Department of Medicine, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Ghana
| | | | - Abiodun M Adeoye
- Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan, Nigeria
| | - Lambert Appiah
- Department of Medicine, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Ghana
| | - Arti Singh
- Department of Medicine, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Ghana
| | | | - Donna Arnett
- College of Public Health, University of Kentucky, USA
| | - Hemant K Tiwari
- The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Daniel Lackland
- College of Nursing, Medical University of South Carolina, South Carolina, USA
| | - Philip Ibinaiye
- Department of Medicine, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Nigeria
| | - Wisdom Oguike
- Department of Medicine, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Nigeria
| | | | - Adeniyi Sunday
- Department of Medicine, University of Ghana Medical School, Accra, Ghana
| | - Abiodun Bello
- Department of Medicine, University of Ilorin Teaching Hospital, Ilorin, Nigeria
| | - Okechukwu Ogah
- Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan, Nigeria
| | - Rufus Akinyemi
- Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan, Nigeria; Neuroscience and Ageing Research Unit, Institute for Advanced Medical Research and Training, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan, Nigeria; Center for Genomic and Precision Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan, Nigeria
| | - Bruce Ovbiagele
- Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California San-Francisco, USA
| | - Mayowa Owolabi
- Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan, Nigeria; Center for Genomic and Precision Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan, Nigeria.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Oliveri S, Ongaro G, Cutica I, Menicucci G, Belperio D, Spinella F, Pravettoni G. Decision-making process about prenatal genetic screening: how deeply do moms-to-be want to know from Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing? BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2023; 23:38. [PMID: 36653738 PMCID: PMC9845820 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-022-05272-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2022] [Accepted: 12/01/2022] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prenatal information may be obtained through invasive diagnostic procedures and non-invasive screening procedures. Several psychological factors are involved in the decision to undergo a non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) but little is known about the decision-making strategies involved in choosing a specific level of in-depth NIPT, considering the increased availability and complexity of NIPT options. The main aim of this work is to assess the impact of psychological factors (anxiety about pregnancy, perception of risk in pregnancy, intolerance to uncertainty), and COVID-19 pandemic on the type of NIPT chosen, in terms of the number of conditions that are tested. METHODS A self-administered survey evaluated the decision-making process about NIPT. The final sample comprised 191 women (Mage = 35.53; SD = 4.79) who underwent a NIPT from one private Italian genetic company. Based on the test date, the sample of women was divided between "NIPT before COVID-19" and "NIPT during COVID-19". RESULTS Almost all of the participants reported being aware of the existence of different types of NIPT and more than half reported having been informed by their gynecologist. Results showed no significant association between the period in which women underwent NIPT (before COVID-19 or during COVID-19) and the preferences for more expanded screening panel. Furthermore, regarding psychological variables, results showed a significant difference between perceived risk for the fetus based on the NIPT type groups, revealing that pregnant women who underwent the more expanded panel had a significantly higher level of perceived risk for the fetus than that reported by pregnant women who underwent the basic one. There was no statistically significant difference between the other psychological variables and NIPT type. CONCLUSIONS Our findings indicate the paramount role of gynecologist and other health care providers, such as geneticists and psychologists, is to support decision-making process in NIPT, in order to overcome people's deficits in genetic knowledge, promote awareness about their preferences, and control anxiety related to the unborn child. Decision-support strategies are critical during the onset of prenatal care, according to the advances in prenatal genomics and to parent's needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Serena Oliveri
- grid.15667.330000 0004 1757 0843Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Giulia Ongaro
- grid.15667.330000 0004 1757 0843Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy ,grid.4708.b0000 0004 1757 2822Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Ilaria Cutica
- grid.4708.b0000 0004 1757 2822Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Giulia Menicucci
- Eurofins Genoma Group, Molecular Genetics Laboratories, Rome, Italy
| | - Debora Belperio
- Eurofins Genoma Group, Molecular Genetics Laboratories, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Gabriella Pravettoni
- grid.15667.330000 0004 1757 0843Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy ,grid.4708.b0000 0004 1757 2822Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Oliveri S, Cincidda C, Ongaro G, Cutica I, Gorini A, Spinella F, Fiorentino F, Baldi M, Pravettoni G. What people really change after genetic testing (GT) performed in private labs: results from an Italian study. Eur J Hum Genet 2021; 30:62-72. [PMID: 33840815 PMCID: PMC8738765 DOI: 10.1038/s41431-021-00879-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2020] [Revised: 03/08/2021] [Accepted: 03/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Despite the widespread diffusion of direct-to-consumer genetic testing (GT), it is still unclear whether people who learn about their genetic susceptibility to a clinical condition change their behaviors, and the psychological factors involved. The aim of the present study is to investigate long-term changes in health-related choices, individual tendencies and risk attitudes in an Italian sample of GT users. In the context of the Mind the Risk study, which investigated a sample of Italian adults who underwent GT in a private laboratory, 99 clients participated in the follow up assessment. They completed a self-administered questionnaire investigating: (a) clinical history and motivation for testing, (b) lifestyle and risk behaviors, (c) individual tendencies toward health, and (d) risk-taking attitude and risk tolerance. Such variables were measured at three different time-points: T0—before GT, T1—at 6 months after genetic results, and T2—at 1 year from results. Results showed that, at baseline, participants who stated they intended to modify their behavior after GT results, effectively did so over time. This result held both for participants who received a positive or negative test result. In general, a healthier diet was the most frequently observed long-term behavioral change. As regards psychological variables, a risk-taking attitude and risk tolerance did not seem to affect the decision to change the lifestyle. Finally, we found an overall reduction in anxiety and worry over health over time, but also a reduction in the motivation for health promotion and prevention, health esteem, and positive expectations for their health in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Serena Oliveri
- Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, European Institute of Oncology (IEO), IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
| | - Clizia Cincidda
- Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, European Institute of Oncology (IEO), IRCCS, Milan, Italy.,Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology (DIPO), University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Giulia Ongaro
- Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, European Institute of Oncology (IEO), IRCCS, Milan, Italy.,Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology (DIPO), University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Ilaria Cutica
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology (DIPO), University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Alessandra Gorini
- Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, European Institute of Oncology (IEO), IRCCS, Milan, Italy.,Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology (DIPO), University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | | | | | - Marina Baldi
- GENOMA Group, Molecular Genetics Laboratory, Rome, Italy
| | - Gabriella Pravettoni
- Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, European Institute of Oncology (IEO), IRCCS, Milan, Italy.,Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology (DIPO), University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Russo GA, Oliveri S, Cincidda C, Guiddi P, Pravettoni G. Exploring public attitude toward biofeedback technologies: Knowledge, preferences and personality tendencies. J Public Health Res 2020; 9:1782. [PMID: 33209858 PMCID: PMC7662746 DOI: 10.4081/jphr.2020.1782] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2020] [Accepted: 09/24/2020] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Biofeedback is increasingly used in the clinical area and in daily health monitoring through wearable devices (e.g. smart watches). Nevertheless, it remains rather unknown. This study aimed to assess, in a sample of Italian citizens, the level of knowledge, attitudes, perceived efficacy and personality tendencies which could affect the uptake of biofeedback technologies. Design and Methods: Participants were recruited by advertising the survey on the social networks, from March to May 2019. 160 subjects filled in an ad hoc online questionnaire assessing socio-demographic variables, clinical status, physical activity, knowledge and attitude towards biofeedback, psychological tendencies toward health. Results: Data showed a good level of interest in biofeedback training in spite of poor knowledge about such technologies. Sport and chronic diseases were not correlated to a greater use of biofeedback. People informed about biofeedback technologies were more interested in undergoing biofeedback training and had higher scores in the Health Locus of Control. Finally, people who showed a positive perception of their own health (Health Esteem) did not rely on these technologies. Discussion: Despite the huge spread of biofeedback technologies, our results disconfirmed the expectation that people having an active lifestyle or a disease were more familiar with biofeedback systems. The attitude toward such technologies seems to depend on individual tendencies. Conclusions: This study suggests the importance to improve general public literacy on biofeedback technologies, tailor tools on their needs and characteristics, empower people’s sense of internal health control for promoting a valid use and a proper knowledge of biofeedback. Significance for public health Despite the huge application of biofeedback technologies in different areas, the technological progress and availability of biofeedback tools does not go hand-in-hand with the general public’s knowledge and attitude for such tools. This contribution focuses on the importance to improve general public literacy on these technologies, for disseminating correct messages on their usefulness for well-being, and highlight the importance to tailor technologies on people’s real needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gaetano A Russo
- Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan
| | - Serena Oliveri
- Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan
| | - Clizia Cincidda
- Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan.,Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Italy
| | - Paolo Guiddi
- Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan
| | - Gabriella Pravettoni
- Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan.,Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Oliveri S, Marton G, Vergani L, Cutica I, Gorini A, Spinella F, Pravettoni G. Genetic Testing Consumers in Italy: A Preliminary Investigation of the Socio-Demographic Profile, Health-Related Habits, and Decision Purposes. Front Public Health 2020; 8:511. [PMID: 33134235 PMCID: PMC7578342 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00511] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2020] [Accepted: 08/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim of the study: Genetic testing is becoming increasingly common in clinical practice and health management; nonetheless, little is known about how the population approaches genetic services through private companies. Our study aims to describe socio-demographic aspects, health-related habits, and overall beliefs and knowledge about genetic risk and testing in a population of Italian citizens who decided to undergo a genetic examination through a private genetic company. Study design: A sample of 152 clients from an Italian private genetic company completed an ad-hoc survey from September 2016 to February 2018, addressing socio-demographic data, health habits, psycho-physic condition, perceived utility of genetic results, decision purposes about data sharing, and behavioral changes after results. Results: Participants (mean age 42.4) were predominantly female (82.2%) and were overall well-educated. Their main source of information were physicians (77%), and 41.1% entrusted the management of results to the same. Thirty-eight percentage underwent genetic analysis for cancer predisposition, 31.3% for fertility problems, 24% for dietary or intolerance issues in the period of enrolment. More than half of them (62.7%) reported a family history of the disease, and overall 69% had a current or past experience with a disease. Clients perceived the genetic screening as useful to adopt behaviors that may prevent disease onset (37.7%), to know their “real health status” (27.4%), and to adopt health-related behaviors (23.3%). 62.8% claimed they were motivated to change behaviors after results (healthier diet, practice exercise, medical checks), and they wanted to share results with their physician and family members. Discussion/Conclusion: The overview of consumers' profiles in Italy and other European countries can contribute to tailoring and regulating genetic services in a way that could be efficient in terms of healthy choices, behaviors, and health resource expenditures for the general public.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Serena Oliveri
- Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, European Institute of Oncology, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Milan, Italy.,Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Giulia Marton
- Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, European Institute of Oncology, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Milan, Italy.,Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Laura Vergani
- Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, European Institute of Oncology, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Milan, Italy.,Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Ilaria Cutica
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Alessandra Gorini
- Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, European Institute of Oncology, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Milan, Italy.,Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Gabriella Pravettoni
- Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, European Institute of Oncology, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Milan, Italy.,Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Wöhlke S, Schaper M, Oliveri S, Cutica I, Spinella F, Pravettoni G, Steinberger D, Schicktanz S. German and Italian Users of Web-Accessed Genetic Data: Attitudes on Personal Utility and Personal Sharing Preferences. Results of a Comparative Survey (n=192). Front Genet 2020; 11:102. [PMID: 32265977 PMCID: PMC7099127 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2020.00102] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2019] [Accepted: 01/29/2020] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Genetic information is increasingly provided outside of the traditional clinical setting, allowing users to access it directly via specialized online platforms. This development is possibly resulting in changing ethical and social challenges for users of predictive genetic tests. Little is known about the attitudes and experiences of users of web-accessed genetic information. This survey analyzes data from two European countries with regard to the utility of genetic information, the users’ ways of making use of and dealing with information, and their sharing behavior. Particular focus is given to ethical and social questions regarding the motivation to share personal genetic results with others. Social factors tested for are national background, gender, and marital, parental, and educational status. This study will contribute to public discourse and offer ethical recommendations. The study will also serve to validate the developed questionnaire for use in population representative surveys.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabine Wöhlke
- Department of Medical Ethics and History of Medicine, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Manuel Schaper
- Department of Medical Ethics and History of Medicine, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Serena Oliveri
- Department of Oncology and Hematology Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.,Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - Ilaria Cutica
- Department of Oncology and Hematology Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.,Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Gabriella Pravettoni
- Department of Oncology and Hematology Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.,Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Silke Schicktanz
- Department of Medical Ethics and History of Medicine, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Masiero M, Oliveri S, Cutica I, Monzani D, Faccio F, Mazzocco K, Pravettoni G. The psychometric properties of the Italian adaptation of the Health Orientation Scale (HOS). Health Qual Life Outcomes 2020; 18:69. [PMID: 32169082 PMCID: PMC7071689 DOI: 10.1186/s12955-020-01298-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2018] [Accepted: 02/14/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background A novel approach suggested that cognitive and dispositional features may explain in depth the health behaviors adoption and the adherence to prevention programs. The Health Orientation Scale (HOS) has been extensively used to map the adoption of health and unhealthy behaviors according to cognitive and dispositional features. Coherently, the main aim of the current research was to assess the factor structure of the Italian version of the HOS using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis and testing the construct validity of the scale by assessing differences in health orientations between tobacco cigarette smokers and nonsmokers. Method The research protocol was organized in two studies. Study 1 evaluated the dimensionality of the HOS in a sample of Northern Italian healthy people. Three hundred and twenty-one participants were enrolled; they were 229 women (71.3%) and 92 men (28.7%). In Study 2, the factor structure and construct validity of the HOS Italian version was assessed trough confirmatory factor analysis using a tobacco cigarette smokers and nonsmokers population. Two hundred and nineteen participants were enrolled; they were 164 women (75.2%) and 55 men (24.8%). Results In Study 1, a seven factors solution was obtained explaining 60% of cumulative variance instead of 10 factors solution of the original version of the HOS. In Study 2, the factor structure of the Italian version of the HOS was confirmed and applied to the smokers and nonsmokers; nonsmokers reported higher values than smokers in Factor 1 (MHPP) [t (208) = − 2.739 p < .007] (CI 95–4.96% to −.809), Factor 2 (HES) [t (209) = − 3.387 p < .001] (CI 95–3.93% to -. 1.03), Factor 3 (HIC) [t(213) = − 2.468 p < .014] (CI 95–2.56% to −.28) and Factor 7 (HEX) [t(217) = − 3.451 p < .001] (CI 95%- 1.45 to .39). Conclusions Results of the Italian adaptation of HOS lead to a partial redistribution of items and confirmed 7 subscales to distinguish psycho-cognitive dispositional dimensions involved in health orientation styles.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Masiero
- Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, University of Milan, Via Festa del Perdono 7, Milan, Italy. .,Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, European Institute of Oncology, IRCSS, Milan, Italy.
| | - S Oliveri
- Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, European Institute of Oncology, IRCSS, Milan, Italy.,Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - I Cutica
- Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, European Institute of Oncology, IRCSS, Milan, Italy.,Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - D Monzani
- Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, European Institute of Oncology, IRCSS, Milan, Italy.,Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - F Faccio
- Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, European Institute of Oncology, IRCSS, Milan, Italy
| | - K Mazzocco
- Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, European Institute of Oncology, IRCSS, Milan, Italy.,Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - G Pravettoni
- Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, European Institute of Oncology, IRCSS, Milan, Italy.,Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Health Orientation, Knowledge, and Attitudes toward Genetic Testing and Personalized Genomic Services: Preliminary Data from an Italian Sample. BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL 2016; 2016:6824581. [PMID: 28105428 PMCID: PMC5220460 DOI: 10.1155/2016/6824581] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2016] [Revised: 11/14/2016] [Accepted: 12/12/2016] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Objective. The study aims at assessing personality tendencies and orientations that could be closely correlated with knowledge, awareness, and interest toward undergoing genetic testing. Methods. A sample of 145 subjects in Italy completed an online survey, investigating demographic data, health orientation, level of perceived knowledge about genetic risk, genetic screening, and personal attitudes toward direct to consumer genetic testing (DTCGT). Results. Results showed that respondents considered genetic assessment to be helpful for disease prevention, but they were concerned that results could affect their life planning with little clinical utility. Furthermore, a very high percentage of respondents (67%) had never heard about genetic testing directly available to the public. Data showed that personality tendencies, such as personal health consciousness, health internal control, health esteem, and confidence, motivation to avoid unhealthiness and motivation for healthiness affected the uptake of genetic information and the interest in undergoing genetic testing. Conclusions. Public knowledge and attitudes toward genetic risk and genetic testing among European countries, along with individual personality and psychological tendencies that could affect these attitudes, remain unexplored. The present study constitutes one of the first attempts to investigate how such personality tendencies could motivation to undergo genetic testing and engagement in lifestyle changes.
Collapse
|
9
|
Masiero M, Riva S, Oliveri S, Fioretti C, Pravettoni G. Optimistic bias in young adults for cancer, cardiovascular and respiratory diseases: A pilot study on smokers and drinkers. J Health Psychol 2016; 23:645-656. [PMID: 27624614 DOI: 10.1177/1359105316667796] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Optimistic bias defines the tendency for human beings to underrate risk when it pertains to themselves compared with their view of risk pertaining to other people in the same conditions. The aim of this work is to investigate the optimistic bias in risk perception and health-related behaviours for three specific conditions in a young adult sample: cancer, respiratory disorders and cardiovascular diseases. Young adults showed an optimistic bias related to cancer, and to cardiovascular diseases. Our findings suggest that optimistic bias is linked to specific behavioural patterns, largely widespread in young adults, such as tobacco cigarette smoking and alcohol consumption.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marianna Masiero
- 1 University of Milan, Italy.,2 European Institute of Oncology (IEO), Italy
| | - Silvia Riva
- 1 University of Milan, Italy.,2 European Institute of Oncology (IEO), Italy
| | - Serena Oliveri
- 1 University of Milan, Italy.,2 European Institute of Oncology (IEO), Italy
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Oliveri S, Pravettoni G, Fioretti C, Hansson MG. Let the Individuals Directly Concerned Decide: A Solution to Tragic Choices in Genetic Risk Information. Public Health Genomics 2016; 19:307-13. [PMID: 27603671 DOI: 10.1159/000448913] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2016] [Accepted: 08/06/2016] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Health-care systems as well as legislators and society seem largely unprepared to face and manage the massive production of genetic risk information. Ethics committees and professional bodies usually do not involve the individuals directly concerned in defining guidelines for genetic risk communication. Therefore, they do not always reflect people's needs and preferences. We argue in this article that we currently experience a cultural shift in medicine where individuals' concerns and preferences regarding genetic risk information are playing a more significant role than before, and that this should have some normative implications. We are going toward a situation where individual citizens are approached as consumers by personal genomics companies [Prainsack: Account Res 2011;18:132-147]. In clinical and research contexts, individuals are also increasingly informed about their own responsibilities for counterbalancing their genetic risk by making individual health care and lifestyle choices. In this situation, communication of genetic risk information may rather be regulated like traffic and markets in which consumers' decision-making power has a fundamental role in the management and regulation of how a service should be provided, as well as in the creation of policy and legislation. We acknowledge that markets may be different depending on different genetic conditions. For example, genetic risk communication for rare diseases, where a close relationship with clinicians is of paramount significance, should be differently regulated than personal genetic profiles of complex diseases, where contributing risk factors related to lifestyle are modifiable by the individual.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Serena Oliveri
- Interdisciplinary Research Center on Decision Making Processes IRIDe, Department of Oncology and Hematology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Oliveri S, Renzi C, Masiero M, Pravettoni G. Living at Risk: Factors That Affect the Experience of Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing. Mayo Clin Proc 2015; 90:1323-6. [PMID: 26434959 DOI: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2015.06.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2015] [Revised: 06/15/2015] [Accepted: 06/25/2015] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Serena Oliveri
- Interdisciplinary Research Center on Decision Making Processes, Department of Health Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy; Applied Research Unit for Cognitive and Psychological Science, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy.
| | - Chiara Renzi
- Applied Research Unit for Cognitive and Psychological Science, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - Marianna Masiero
- Interdisciplinary Research Center on Decision Making Processes, Department of Health Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy; Applied Research Unit for Cognitive and Psychological Science, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - Gabriella Pravettoni
- Interdisciplinary Research Center on Decision Making Processes, Department of Health Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy; Applied Research Unit for Cognitive and Psychological Science, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|