Micromotion analysis of different implant configuration, bone density, and crestal cortical bone thickness in immediately loaded mandibular full-arch implant restorations: A nonlinear finite element study

Comparing Implant Macrodesigns and Their Impact on Stability: A Year-Long Clinical Study

Background and Objectives: The aim of this study was to clinically evaluate the primary and secondary stability of dental implants with different macrodesigns using resonance frequency analysis and to determine whether implant design and length influence implant stability. Materials and methods: This study included 48 healthy patients receiving dental implants, and a pre-implant planning protocol was used, which involved detailed bone analysis, clinical examinations, and Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) analysis. The implants were of various types and dimensions (Alpha-Bio Tec (Israel), DFI, SPI, and NEO), and the surgical procedures were performed using standard methods. Implant stability was measured using resonance frequency analysis (RFA) immediately after placement and after 3, 6, and 12 months. The total number of implants placed in all patients was 96. Results: The average primary stability value for 10 mm SPI implants placed in the maxilla was 68.2 ± 1.7 Implant Stability Quotient (ISQ) units, while for 10 mm NEO implants, it was 74.0 ± 0.9. The average primary stability value for a 10 mm DFI implant placed in the mandible was 72.8 ± 1.2 ISQ, while for a 10 mm NEO implant placed in the mandible, it was 76.3 ± 0.8 ISQ. Based on the Friedman ANOVA test, the differences in the stability measurements for the 10 mm and 11.5 mm SPI implants and for the 10 mm and 11.5 mm NEO implants in the maxilla on day 0 and after 3, 6, and 12 months were significant at p < 0.05. Similarly, based on the Friedman ANOVA test, the differences in the stability measurements for the 10 mm and 11.5 mm DFI implants and for the 10 mm and 11.5 mm NEO implants in the mandible on day 0 and after 3, 6, and 12 months were significant at p < 0.05 (p = 0.00000). Conclusions: Universal tapered implants of the NEO type stood out as the optimal choice, as they provided statistically significantly higher primary stability in both soft and hard bone types compared to other implants. The implant length did not significantly affect this stability.

Design and evaluation of mechanical strength of multi-material polymeric implants for mandibular reconstruction

Reconstruction of mandible implants to address segmental abnormalities is still a challenging task, both in vitro and in vivo. The mechanical strength of the materials used is a critical factor that determines how well bone is regenerated. The reconstruction technique of mandibular abnormalities widely uses polymeric implants. It is critical to evaluate the mechanical resilience under different load cases, including axial, combined, and flexural loading conditions. This study developed implants for mandibular defects using a combination of four materials: polylactic acid (PLA), polyethylene terephthalate glycol (PETG), thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU), and polycaprolactone (PCL), with the aim of mimicking the inherent characteristics of cortical and cancellous bone structures and evaluating their mechanical properties to support bone Osseo integration. The eleven of these combinations of structures result below the micro strain threshold level of <3000 µε, and the five combinations of the structures result in micro strain above the threshold value. The intact bone study results show that the stress under axial, combined, and flexural loading conditions is 27.6, 38.9, and 64.9 MPa, respectively. This study's stress results are lower than those from the intact bone study. The study found that the combinations of PLA and TPU material were most preferred for the cortical and cancellous bone regions of polymeric implants. These materials are also compatible with 3D printing. The results of this study can be used to find multi-material combinations that are strong and flexible.

Mandibular biomechanics rehabilitated with different prosthetic restorations under normal and impact loading scenarios

BACKGROUND

Restorative treatment options for edentulous patients range from traditional dentures to fixed restorations. The proper selection of materials greatly influences the longevity and stability of fixed restorations. Most prosthetic parts are frequently fabricated from titanium. Ceramics (e.g. zirconia) and polymers (e.g. PEEK and BIOHPP) have recently been included in these fabrications. The mandibular movement produces complex patterns of stress and strain. Mandibular fractures may result from these stresses and strains exceeding the critical limits because of the impact force from falls or accidents. Therefore, it is necessary to evaluate the biomechanical behavior of the edentulous mandible with different restorations under different loading situations.

OBJECTIVE

This study analyzes the biomechanical behavior of mandibles after four prosthetic restorations for rehabilitation under normal and impact loading scenarios.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The mandibular model was constructed with a fixed restoration, which was simulated using various materials (e.g. Titanium, Zirconia & BIOHPP), under frontal bite force, maximum intercuspation, and chin impact force. From the extraction of tensile and compressive stresses and strains, as well as the total deformation of mandible segments, the biomechanical behavior and clinical situations were studied.

RESULTS

Under frontal bite, the anterior body exhibited the highest tensile (60.34 MPa) and compressive (108.81 MPa) stresses using restoration 4, while the condyles and angles had the lowest tensile (7.12 MPa) and compressive (12.67 MPa) stresses using restoration 3. Under maximum intercuspation, the highest tensile (40.02 MPa) and compressive (98.87 MPa) stresses were generated on the anterior body of the cortical bone using restoration 4. Additionally, the lowest tensile (7.7 MPa) and compressive (10.08 MPa) stresses were generated on the condyles and angles, respectively, using restoration 3. Under chin impact, the highest tensile (374.57 MPa) and compressive (387.3 MPa) stresses were generated on the anterior body using restoration 4. Additionally, the lowest tensile (0.65 MPa) and compressive (0.57 MPa) stresses were generated on the coronoid processes using restoration 3. For all loading scenarios, the anterior body of the mandible had the highest stress and strain values compared with the other segments. Compared to the traditional titanium restoration.2, restoration.1(zirconia) increases the tensile and compressive stresses and strains on the mandibular segments, in contrast to restoration.3 (BIOHPP). In addition, zirconia implants exhibited higher displacements than the other implants.

CONCLUSION

In the normal loading scenario, the tensile and compressive stresses and strains on the mandible were within the allowable limits when all restorations were used. Under the chin impact loading scenario, the anterior body of the mandible was damaged by restorations 1 and 4.

Comparative biomechanics of all-on-4 and vertical implant placement in asymmetrical mandibular: a finite element study

BACKGROUND

Clinical scenarios frequently present challenges when patients exhibit asymmetrical mandibular atrophy. The dilemma arises: should we adhere to the conventional All-on-4 technique, or should we contemplate placing vertically oriented implants on the side with sufficient bone mass? This study aims to employ three-dimensional finite element analysis to simulate and explore the biomechanical advantages of each approach.

METHODS

A finite element model, derived from computed tomography (CT) data, was utilized to simulate the nonhomogeneous features of the mandible. Three configurations-All-on-4, All-on-5-v and All-on-5-o were studied. Vertical and oblique forces of 200 N were applied unilaterally, and vertical force of 100 N was applied anteriorly to simulate different masticatory mechanisms. The maximum von Mises stresses on the implant and framework were recorded, as well as the maximum equivalent strain in the peri-implant bone.

RESULTS

The maximum stress values for all designs were located at the neck of the distal implant, and the maximum strains in the bone tissue were located around the distal implant. The All-on-5-o and All-on-5-v models exhibited reduced stresses and strains compared to All-on-4, highlighting the potential benefits of the additional implant. There were no considerable differences in stresses and strains between the All-on-5-o and All-on-5-v groups.

CONCLUSIONS

With the presence of adequate bone volume on one side and severe atrophy of the contralateral bone, while the "All-on-4 concept" is a viable approach, vertical implant placement optimizes the transfer of forces between components and tissues.

Biomechanical Effects of Different Load Cases with an Implant-Supported Full Bridge on Four Implants in an Edentulous Mandible: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis (3D-FEA)

The long-term success and predictability of implant-supported restorations largely depends on the biomechanical forces (stresses) acting on implants and the surrounding alveolar bone in the mandible. The aim of our study was to investigate the biomechanical behavior of an edentulous mandible with an implant-supported full bridge on four implants under simulated masticatory forces, in the context of different loading schemes, using a three-dimensional finite element analysis (3D-FEA). A patient-specific 3D finite element model was constructed using pre- and post-implantation computer tomography (CT) images of a patient undergoing implant treatment. Simplified masticatory forces set at 300 N were exerted vertically on the denture in four different simulated load cases (LC1-LC4). Two sets of simulations for different implants and denture materials (S1: titanium and titanium; S2: titanium and cobalt-chromium, respectively) were made. Stress outputs were taken as maximum (Pmax) and minimum principal stress (Pmin) and equivalent stress (Peqv) values. The highest peak Pmax values were observed for LC2 (where the modelled masticatory force excluded the cantilevers of the denture extending behind the terminal implants), both regarding the cortical bone (S1 Pmax: 89.57 MPa, S2 Pmax: 102.98 MPa) and trabecular bone (S1 Pmax: 3.03 MPa, S2 Pmax: 2.62 MPa). Overall, LC1-where masticatory forces covered the entire mesio-distal surface of the denture, including the cantilever-was the most advantageous. Peak Pmax values in the cortical bone and the trabecular bone were 14.97-15.87% and 87.96-94.54% higher in the case of S2, respectively. To ensure the long-term maintenance and longevity of treatment for implant-supported restorations in the mandible, efforts to establish the stresses of the surrounding bone in the physiological range, with the most even stress distribution possible, have paramount importance.

In-silico study of type 'B' condylar head fractures and evaluating the influence of two positional screw distance in two-screw osteosynthesis construct

Clinical fixation screws are common in clinical practices to fix mandibular condyle fractures. Evidence suggests significance of 'working length' that is, distance between proximal and distal fixation screws in proximity to the fracture in orthopaedic implant design. In pursuit of stable implant-bone construct, this study aims to investigate the biomechanical performance of each configuration considered in the study and provide an optimal working length between the screws for clinical reference. Finite element models of virtually designed broken condyle as type 'B' were simulated and analysed in ANSYS Workbench. Screws are implanted according to previous literature at five varied distances 'd' maintaining five different ratios with the fracture length 'D'. Based on a literature review, boundary conditions, muscle traction forces and non-linear contacts were assigned to obtain precise results. Each case is considered an individual configuration and von Mises distribution, microstrain in bone, screw-bone interface micromotion and fracture dislocation were evaluated for all these configurations. Stress-shielding phenomenon is observed for maximum von Mises stresses in bone. Microstrain concentration was significant in cancellous bone in the vicinity of the screw around the fracture line. Configurations were compared based on the stress-strain along with micromotion to support the required amount of osseointegration between implant and bone. Presented data from all five conditions supported the assumption that under physiological loading conditions, the D3 configuration provided stability for fracture healing. Further research on screw shapes, diameters and material properties, or investigating the direction of forces within the screws could provide further insight into this topic.

Socket shield technique: Stress distribution analysis

Background

To analyze through finite element analysis the stress distribution in peri-implant bone tissues, implants, and prosthetic components induced by the socket shield (SS) technique in comparison to other techniques used to treat tooth loss.

Materials and Methods

A three-dimensional model of a superior central incisor crown supported by implant was modeled and three different placement conditions were simulated: SS - 2.0-mm-thick root dentin fragment positioned between the alveolar buccal wall and implant; heterologous bone graft (HBG) - bovine bone graft positioned the alveolar buccal wall and implant; and control (C) - implant fully placed in bone tissue of a healed alveolus. The model was restricted at the lateral surfaces of the bone tissue and the following loads were simulated: Both oblique (45°) loads of 100 N on the lingual surface of the crown (maximal habitual intercuspation) and 25.5 N on the incisal edge of the crown (tooth contact during mandibular protrusion) were simultaneously applied. Tensile stress, shear stress, compression, and displacement were analyzed in the cortical bone, trabecular bone, dentin root fragment, and bone graft; while equivalent von Mises stresses were quantified in the implant and prosthetic components.

Results

Stress values of SS and HBG in the bone tissues were higher than C, while slight differences within models were observed for dentin root fragment, bone graft, implant, and prosthetic components.

Conclusions

The SS technique presented the highest stress concentration in the peri-implant tissues.

Implant-Supported Prostheses in the Edentulous Mandible: Biomechanical Analysis of Different Implant Configurations via Finite Element Analysis

This study explores the implant-supported prosthetic treatment alternatives of the edentulous mandible from a biomechanical point of view by means of a Finite Element Analysis (FEA). Finite element (FE) models were used to simulate cases treated with six, five, and four, implants and a fixed prosthesis with a cantilever. In the four implant treatments, three cases were analyzed; the posterior implants were placed in axial positions, angled at 30° and 45°. Cases with six and four axially placed implants were also analyzed by placing the posterior implants distally to the foramen, thus eliminating the cantilever in the prostheses. In the cases with implants between foramina, the highest values for the principal strains and von Mises stresses were observed in the case with four implants where the posterior implants were angled at 45°. Cases with implants placed distally to the foramen and without a cantilever showed much lower bone stress and strain levels compared to cases with implants between foramina. From a biomechanical point of view, it seems to be a better option to use implants positioned distally to the foramen, eliminating cantilevers.

Comparison of 4‐ or 6‐implant supported immediate full‐arch fixed prostheses: A retrospective cohort study of 217 patients followed up for 3–13 years

PURPOSE

Choosing four or six implants to support immediate full-arch fixed prostheses (FAFPs) is still controversial worldwide. This study aims to analyze and compare the long-term results of All-on-4 and All-on-6.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective cohort study enrolled 217 patients rehabilitated with 1222 implants supporting 271 FAFPs, including 202 prostheses supported by 4 implants (All-on-4 group) and 69 prostheses supported by 6 implants (All-on-6 group), and followed up for 3-13 years. Implant survival, prosthesis survival, complications, and implant marginal bone loss (MBL) were evaluated and compared between two groups. Patient characteristics including age, gender, jaw, opposite dentition condition, smoking habit, bruxism, bone quantity and quality, cantilever length (CL), prosthesis material, and oral hygiene were analyzed to assess their influence on the clinical results of the two groups. Six surgeons and three prosthodontists who performed FAFPs more than 5 years were invited for questionnaires, to assess patient- and clinician-related influences on implant number.

RESULT

In general, All-on-4 group indicated no significant difference with All-on-6 group in the implant survival (implant-level: hazard ratio [HR] = 1.0 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.8-1.2], P = 0.96; prosthesis-level: HR = 0.8 [95% CI: 0.3-1.8], P = 0.54), prosthesis survival (odds ratio [OR] = 0.8 [95% CI: 0.3-2.8], P = 0.56), biological complications (OR = 0.9 [95% CI: 0.5-1.8], P = 0.78), technical complications of provisional prosthesis (OR = 1.3 [95% CI: 0.7-2.3], P = 0.42), technical complications of definitive prosthesis (OR = 1.1 [95% CI: 0.6-2.2], P = 0.33) and the 1st, 5th, and 10th year MBL (P = 0.65, P = 0.28, P = 0.14). However, for specific covariates, including elderly patients, opposing natural/fixed dentition, smoking, bruxism, long CL, low bone density, and all acrylic provisional prostheses, All-on-6 was more predictable in some clinical measurements than All-on-4. The implant prosthodontists and the medium-experienced clinicians showed significant preference for All-on-6 (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Based on this study, the long-term clinical results showed no significant difference between All-on-4 and All-on-6 groups in general. However, for some specific characteristics, All-on-6 seemed to be more predictable in some clinical measurements than All-on-4. For the clinicians' decision-making, medium-experienced clinicians and the implant prosthodontists showed significant preference for All-on-6.

Structural Design and Finite Element Simulation Analysis of Grade 3 Graded Porous Titanium Implant

The metal titanium is often used as a dental implant material, and the elastic modulus of solid titanium implants does not match the biological bone tissue, which can easily produce a stress shielding effect and cause implant failure. In this paper, a three-level gradient porous structure implant was designed, and its mechanical and biological adaptability were studied by finite element simulation analysis. Combined with the comprehensive evaluation of the mechanical and biological properties of implants of various structures, the analysis found that a porous implant with porosity of 59.86% of the gradient was the best structure. The maximum equivalent stress of this structure in the mandible that simulated the oral environment was 154.34 MPa, which was less than half of its theoretical compression yield strength. The strain of the surrounding bone tissue lies in the bone compared with other structures, the proportion of the active state of plastic construction is larger, at 10.51%, and the fretting value of this structure and the bone tissue interface is the smallest, at only 10 μm.

Biomechanical Analysis of Different Framework Design, Framework Material and Bone Density in the Edentulous Mandible With Fixed Implant-Supported Prostheses: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Study

PURPOSE

The objective of this finite element study was to investigate the effect of different framework designs, framework materials, and bone densities on the stress distribution of fixed implant-supported prostheses for edentulous mandibles.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Under the condition of 2-mm cortical bone, 16 models were created in the edentulous mandible to simulate different framework designs (1-piece or 3-piece frameworks) with different framework material (pure titanium, zirconia, polyetheretherketone, or carbon fiber-reinforced polyetheretherketone) in-high or low-density trabecular bone. Then, vertical loading and oblique loading at 75° were applied to the anterior and posterior regions. The stress distribution and stress concentration region of implant and peri-implant bone with different combinations were compared by finite element analysis.

RESULTS

The use of the 1-piece zirconia framework in high-density trabecular bone improved stress distribution on implants and peri-implant bone. The region of stress concentration is located in the buccal cervix of the distal implants and the distobuccal portion of the cortical bone in all models. To improve the stress distribution on fixed implant-supported dentures for edentulous mandibles, the 1-piece framework and zirconia represent the better combinations.

CONCLUSION

Under the condition of 2-mm cortical bone thickness, the full-arch zirconia framework had minimum von Mises stress on implants and peri-implant bone in all models, and high trabecular bone density greatly decreased the stress on cortical bone. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Computed tomography assessment of maxillary bone density for orthodontic mini-implant placement with respect to vertical growth patterns

OBJECTIVE

To quantitatively measure and report bone density of maxilla in the interradicular (alveolar and basal bone) and infrazygomatic crest (IZC) region in various growth patterns among Dravidian individuals.

DESIGN

This was a retrospective spiral computed tomography (CT) study.

SETTING

The study was conducted at the Department of Orthodontics, Saveetha Dental College and Hospital, Tamil Nadu, India.

METHODS

Sixty CT scans (24 men, 36 women; mean age = 25.3 years and 23.8 years, respectively) divided equally into three groups based on vertical facial proportions were included. Bone density measurements in Hounsfield units (HU) were performed using Philips and RadiAnt DICOM viewers. Buccal cortical, palatal cortical and cancellous bone regions were analysed in a Philips DICOM viewer and IZC region was analysed in a RadiAnt DICOM viewer. Statistical analysis with one-way ANOVA and post-hoc Tukey HSD test was done.

RESULTS

The hypodivergent group had a significantly higher bone density at the buccal cortex in posterior region (P < 0.05) when compared to the normodivergent and hyperdivergent groups. Buccal basal bone was denser than buccal alveolar bone (P < 0.05) in all three groups. In the IZC region, hypodivergent groups had significantly higher density values when compared to the normodivergent and hyperdivergent groups (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The present study concluded that cancellous bone density in the interradicular regions was greatest in the anterior sites and was not influenced by growth pattern. Hypodivergent groups tend to have higher density in the posterior regions (buccal and palatal cortical bone) and at the IZC region compared to normodivergent and hyperdivergent groups.

Biomechanical analysis of the press-fit effect in a conical Morse taper implant system by using an in vitro experimental test and finite element analysis

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

The press-fit (Morse taper) implant system is commonly used to restore edentulous areas. However, abutment screws in this system may be damaged because of the 2- or 3-piece design, consequently causing complications. How these damaging situations occur is unclear.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this in vitro and finite element analysis (FEA) study was to elucidate the mechanisms of the press-fit implant system underlying abutment screw damage.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The ANKYLOS implant system was used as a simulation model and for experimental test specimens. The experimental test was performed by using a material test system, and the obtained data were used to validate the FEA outcome. In the FEA simulation, the bilinear material property and nonlinear contact conditions were applied to simulate the process of tightening the abutment screw between the abutment and implant. A force of 300 N was then applied to the abutment to investigate the stress distribution and deformation of the implant system.

RESULTS

In the experimental test, the fracture site of all specimens was observed at the abutment-screw thread. All implants and abutments exhibited permanent bending deformation. The results of the FEA simulation generally concurred with the experimental outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

The abutment torque used to generate the press-fit contact interface between the abutment and implant induced stresses within the implant components, substantially increasing the failure probability of the conical implant system during function.

Biomechanical comparison between metal block and cement-screw techniques for the treatment of tibial bone defects in total knee arthroplasty based on finite element analysis

BACKGROUND

Managing bone defects is a critical aspect of total knee arthroplasty. In this study, we compared the metal block and cement-screw techniques for the treatment of Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute type 2A tibial bone defects from the biomechanical standpoint.

METHOD

The metal block and cement-screw techniques were applied to finite element models of 5- and 10-mm tibial bone defects. Biomechanical compatibility was evaluated based on the stress distributions of the proximal tibia and tibial tray. The displacement of the tibial tray and maximum relative micromotion between the tibial stem and tibia were analyzed to assess the stability of the implant.

RESULTS

The maximum stress in both the proximal tibia and tibial tray was greater with the cement-screw technique than with the metal block technique. The stress of the proximal lateral tibia with the cement-screw technique was significantly larger than with the metal block technique (p < 0.05). For the 5-mm bone defect, the maximum relative micromotion was lower than the critical value of 150 μm. For the 10-mm defect, the maximum relative micromotion was 128 μm with the metal block technique and 155 μm with the cement-screw technique, with the latter exceeding the critical value.

CONCLUSIONS

The cement-screw technique showed superior biomechanical compatibility to the metal block technique and is more suitable for 5-mm bone defects. However, as it may reduce the fixation strength in 10-mm bone defects, the metal block technique is more appropriate in this case.

Different diameters of titanium dioxide nanotubes modulate Saos-2 osteoblast-like cell adhesion and osteogenic differentiation and nanomechanical properties of the surface

Nanostructured cpTi surfaces affected Saos-2 cell adhesion, proliferation, and osteogenic differentiation as well as the nanomechanical properties of the surface.