1
|
SHEA/IDSA/APIC Practice Recommendation: Strategies to prevent healthcare-associated infections through hand hygiene: 2022 Update. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2023; 44:355-376. [PMID: 36751708 PMCID: PMC10015275 DOI: 10.1017/ice.2022.304] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 24.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/09/2023]
Abstract
The purpose of this document is to highlight practical recommendations to assist acute-care hospitals in prioritization and implementation of strategies to prevent healthcare-associated infections through hand hygiene. This document updates the Strategies to Prevent Healthcare-Associated Infections in Acute Care Hospitals through Hand Hygiene, published in 2014. This expert guidance document is sponsored by the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology (SHEA). It is the product of a collaborative effort led by SHEA, the Infectious Diseases Society of America, the Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, the American Hospital Association, and The Joint Commission, with major contributions from representatives of a number of organizations and societies with content expertise.
Collapse
|
2
|
Health Promotion Model-Based Skin Health Program to Improve Skin Health Behaviors, Quality of Life, and Self-Efficacy and Reduce Eczema Symptoms in Hairdresser Apprentices. JOURNAL OF THE DERMATOLOGY NURSES' ASSOCIATION 2023. [DOI: 10.1097/jdn.0000000000000716] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
|
3
|
Santoro PE, Borrelli I, Gualano MR, Proietti I, Skroza N, Rossi MF, Amantea C, Daniele A, Ricciardi W, Potenza C, Moscato U. The Dermatological Effects and Occupational Impacts of Personal Protective Equipment on a Large Sample of Healthcare Workers During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Front Public Health 2022; 9:815415. [PMID: 35141194 PMCID: PMC8818717 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.815415] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2021] [Accepted: 12/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Working during the Sars-CoV-2 pandemic healthcare workers (HCWs) had to wear Personal Protective Equipment (PPEs) for extended periods of time, leading to an increase in dermatological reactions. The study evaluates the prevalence of adverse skin reactions to PPEs among Italian healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic, and aims to determine whether prolonged PPEs usage poses a significant occupational health risk, by measuring the loss of work days and the eligibility of workers that requested health surveillance due to dermatological PPEs reactions. Materials and Methods An online ad hoc questionnaire was administered to a sample of Italian HCWs. Questions verted on sociodemographic characteristics, PPEs usage, and occupational well-being. Descriptive analyses and logistic regressions were performed to explore possible associations between variables. Results Two types of PPEs, Gloves and Masks, were tested. The sample included 1,223 interviewed HCWs, 1,184 gave their consent for participation. A total of 90 medical surveillance visits were requested due to PPEs related dermatological issues: in 30 cases were recognized limitations in working duties and in one case the worker was deemed not fit to keep working. Furthermore, 25 workers had a loss of occupational days due to dermatological issues. A statistically significant correlation was observed with being a nurse or midwife (OR = 1.91, IC = 1.38–2.63, p < 0.001), and being female (OR = 2.04, IC = 1.49–2.78, p < 0.001), which acted as risk factors. Discussion The enhanced protection measures put in place during the COVID-19 pandemic, highlight the importance of occupational dermatology. This study could contribute to assess the issue, aiming to develop better prevention strategies in the workplace in order to improve well-being of HCWs and reduce the impact of dermatological adverse reactions to PPEs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paolo Emilio Santoro
- Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Rome, Italy
- Department of Life Sciences and Public Health, Section of Occupational Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Ivan Borrelli
- Department of Life Sciences and Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Maria Rosaria Gualano
- Department of Public Health Sciences and Paediatrics, University of Torino, Torino, Italy
- *Correspondence: Maria Rosaria Gualano
| | - Ilaria Proietti
- Dermatology Unit “Daniele Innocenzi”, “A. Fiorini” Hospital, Terracina, Italy
| | - Nevena Skroza
- Dermatology Unit “Daniele Innocenzi”, “A. Fiorini” Hospital, Terracina, Italy
| | - Maria Francesca Rossi
- Department of Life Sciences and Public Health, Section of Occupational Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Carlotta Amantea
- Department of Life Sciences and Public Health, Section of Occupational Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Alessandra Daniele
- Department of Life Sciences and Public Health, Section of Occupational Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Walter Ricciardi
- Department of Life Sciences and Public Health, Section of Hygiene, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Concetta Potenza
- Dermatology Unit “Daniele Innocenzi”, “A. Fiorini” Hospital, Terracina, Italy
| | - Umberto Moscato
- Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Rome, Italy
- Department of Life Sciences and Public Health, Section of Occupational Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
- Department of Life Sciences and Public Health, Section of Hygiene, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Heichel T, Brans R, John SM, Nienhaus A, Nordheider K, Wilke A, Sonsmann FK. Acceptance of semipermeable glove liners compared to cotton glove liners in health care workers with work-related skin diseases: Results of a quasi-randomized trial under real workplace conditions. Contact Dermatitis 2021; 85:543-553. [PMID: 34232510 DOI: 10.1111/cod.13929] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2021] [Revised: 06/08/2021] [Accepted: 07/05/2021] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Glove liners (GLs) made of cotton (COT) are worn under impermeable gloves to prevent occlusion effects. Semipermeable GLs made of Sympatex (SYM) might be an alternative. OBJECTIVES To evaluate the acceptance of GLs (COT/SYM) in health care workers (HCWs) with work-related skin diseases (WRSDs). METHODS One hundred sixty-one HCWs with WRSDs were asked to wear GLs in combination with occlusive gloves for 10 ±2 weeks under workplace conditions. A questionnaire was applied to compare acceptance and usability of the respective glove combinations and previously used protective gloves (PUGs). RESULTS A total of 120 data sets were available (SYM: n = 65, 77.4%; COT: n = 55, 71.4%). Both GLs provided a significantly lower sweating sensation, more pleasant climate, comfortable wearing experience, and moist or dry feeling on the skin compared to PUGs. SYM-GLs performed significantly better than COT-GLs regarding mobility of hands, sensitivity, and sense of touch. COT-GLs were significantly better than SYM-GLs in the categories fit, donning and doffing, and material contact. CONCLUSIONS Both GLs did not impair work performance, were applicable in various areas of health care activities, and were preferred over PUGs. Our results indicate that SYM-GLs are an alternative to COT-GLs and thus may contribute to current prevention strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Theres Heichel
- Department of Dermatology, Environmental Medicine and Health Theory, University of Osnabrück, Osnabrück, Germany.,Institute for Interdisciplinary Dermatological Prevention and Rehabilitation (iDerm) at the University of Osnabrück, Osnabrück, Germany
| | - Richard Brans
- Department of Dermatology, Environmental Medicine and Health Theory, University of Osnabrück, Osnabrück, Germany.,Institute for Interdisciplinary Dermatological Prevention and Rehabilitation (iDerm) at the University of Osnabrück, Osnabrück, Germany.,Lower-Saxonian Institute of Occupational Dermatology, University of Osnabrück, Osnabrück, Germany
| | - Swen Malte John
- Department of Dermatology, Environmental Medicine and Health Theory, University of Osnabrück, Osnabrück, Germany.,Institute for Interdisciplinary Dermatological Prevention and Rehabilitation (iDerm) at the University of Osnabrück, Osnabrück, Germany.,Lower-Saxonian Institute of Occupational Dermatology, University of Osnabrück, Osnabrück, Germany
| | - Albert Nienhaus
- Competence Centre for Epidemiology and Health Service Research in Nursing, Institute for Health Service Research in Dermatology and Nursing, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany
| | - Kathrin Nordheider
- Institute for Interdisciplinary Dermatological Prevention and Rehabilitation (iDerm) at the University of Osnabrück, Osnabrück, Germany
| | - Annika Wilke
- Department of Dermatology, Environmental Medicine and Health Theory, University of Osnabrück, Osnabrück, Germany.,Institute for Interdisciplinary Dermatological Prevention and Rehabilitation (iDerm) at the University of Osnabrück, Osnabrück, Germany.,Lower-Saxonian Institute of Occupational Dermatology, University of Osnabrück, Osnabrück, Germany
| | - Flora K Sonsmann
- Department of Dermatology, Environmental Medicine and Health Theory, University of Osnabrück, Osnabrück, Germany.,Institute for Interdisciplinary Dermatological Prevention and Rehabilitation (iDerm) at the University of Osnabrück, Osnabrück, Germany.,Lower-Saxonian Institute of Occupational Dermatology, University of Osnabrück, Osnabrück, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Guertler A, Moellhoff N, Schenck TL, Hagen CS, Kendziora B, Giunta RE, French LE, Reinholz M. Onset of occupational hand eczema among healthcare workers during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: Comparing a single surgical site with a COVID-19 intensive care unit. Contact Dermatitis 2020; 83:108-114. [PMID: 32452036 PMCID: PMC7283680 DOI: 10.1111/cod.13618] [Citation(s) in RCA: 79] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2020] [Revised: 05/18/2020] [Accepted: 05/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Background As a result of the COVID‐19 outbreak, hygiene regulations have been revised and hand sanitation has been intensified. Objective To investigate the onset of hand eczema during the COVID‐19 pandemic in healthcare workers (HCWs) directly involved in intensive care of COVID‐19 patients and HCWs without direct contact with COVID‐19 patients. Hereby, we aim at increasing awareness about occupational hand eczema and preventive measures that can be adopted. Method A survey was distributed amongst 114 HCWs at a single surgical centre and at a COVID‐19 intensive care unit of the university hospital Ludwig Maximilian University Munich, Germany. Participants were questioned about the daily frequency of hand hygiene prior to and during the pandemic. Participants self‐reported the onset of hand eczema and associated symptoms. Results Our study revealed a significant increase in hand washing, disinfection, and use of hand cream across all participants (P‐value <.001), regardless of having direct contact with COVID‐19 patients. A high prevalence of symptoms associated with acute hand dermatitis of 90.4% was found across all HCWs, whereas hand eczema itself was underreported (14.9%). Conclusion The increase in hand sanitation during the COVID‐19 pandemic impairs the skin of the hands across all HCWs, independent of direct intensive care of affected patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne Guertler
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy, University Hospital, LMU, Munich, Germany
| | - Nicholas Moellhoff
- Division of Hand, Plastic and Aesthetic Surgery, University Hospital, LMU, Munich, Germany
| | - Thilo L Schenck
- Division of Hand, Plastic and Aesthetic Surgery, University Hospital, LMU, Munich, Germany
| | - Christine S Hagen
- Division of Hand, Plastic and Aesthetic Surgery, University Hospital, LMU, Munich, Germany
| | - Benjamin Kendziora
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy, University Hospital, LMU, Munich, Germany
| | - Riccardo E Giunta
- Division of Hand, Plastic and Aesthetic Surgery, University Hospital, LMU, Munich, Germany
| | - Lars E French
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy, University Hospital, LMU, Munich, Germany
| | - Markus Reinholz
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy, University Hospital, LMU, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kuiper D, Steverink N, Stewart RE, Reijneveld SA, Sanderman R, Goedendorp MM. Pace and determinants of implementation of the self-management of well-being group intervention: a multilevel observational study. BMC Health Serv Res 2019; 19:67. [PMID: 30683092 PMCID: PMC6346574 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-019-3891-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2018] [Accepted: 01/09/2019] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Background When implementing an empirically supported intervention (ESI) arrays of influencing factors operate on the professional and organizational level, but so far dependency between these levels has often been ignored. The aim of this study is to describe the pace and identify determinants of implementation of the Self-Management of Well-being (SMW) group intervention while taking the dependency between professionals and organizations into account. Methods Pace of implementation was measured as the time between training of professionals and first use of the SMW intervention in months. Determinants of first use were derived from the Fleuren framework and assessed using web-based questionnaires and telephone interviews. First, univariate analyses, Fisher’s exact tests and t-tests, were performed to identify determinants of first use of the SMW intervention on the individual professional and the organizational level independently. Second, multilevel analyses were performed to correct for the dependency between professionals and organizations. Simple multilevel logistic regression analyses were performed with determinants found significant in the univariate analyses as independent variables, first use as dependent variable, professionals entered in the first level, and organizations in the second level. Results Forty-eight professionals from 18 organizations were trained to execute the SMW intervention. Thirty-two professionals achieved first use, at a mean pace of 7.5 months ± 4.2. Determinants on the professional level were ‘ownership’, ‘relative advantage’, ‘support from colleagues’ and ‘compatibility’. Determinants on the organizational level were ‘organizational size’ and ‘innovation-task orientation fit’. Multilevel analysis showed that ‘compatibility’, a factor on the professional level, was the only significant determinant contributing to first use in the multilevel model. Conclusions This implementation study revealed a strong dependency between professionals and organizations. Results showed that a majority of professionals used the SMW intervention in about 8 months. When the dependency between professionals and organization was taken into account, the professionals’ perception of compatibility was the only remaining determinant of implementation on the professional level. Organizational size and managers’ perception of ‘innovation-task orientation fit’ were determinants of implementation on the organizational level. It is advisable to discuss the compatibility between new and current tasks among managers and professionals before adopting a new intervention. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12913-019-3891-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daphne Kuiper
- Service Desk Clinical Research Office, UMC staff, University Medical Center Groningen, P.O. Box 30.001, AB41, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands.,Department of Health Psychology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, P.O. Box 196, FA12, 9700 AD, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Nardi Steverink
- Department of Health Psychology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, P.O. Box 196, FA12, 9700 AD, Groningen, The Netherlands.,Department of Sociology, University of Groningen, Grote Rozenstraat 31, 9712 TG, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Roy E Stewart
- Department of Health Sciences, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, P.O. Box 196, FA10, 9700 AD, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Sijmen A Reijneveld
- Department of Health Sciences, (Community & Occupational Medicine) University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, P.O. Box 196, FA10, 9700 AD, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Robbert Sanderman
- Department of Health Psychology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, P.O. Box 196, FA12, 9700 AD, Groningen, The Netherlands.,Department of Psychology, Health & Technology, University of Twente, P.O. Box 217, 7500 AE, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Martine M Goedendorp
- Department of Health Psychology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, P.O. Box 196, FA12, 9700 AD, Groningen, The Netherlands. .,Department of Health Science, Faculty of Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, De Boelelaan 1105, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Soltanipoor M, Rustemeyer T, Sluiter JK, Hines J, Frison F, Kezic S. Evaluating the effect of electronic monitoring and feedback on hand cream use in healthcare workers: Healthy Hands Project. Contact Dermatitis 2019; 80:26-34. [PMID: 30426525 PMCID: PMC6587989 DOI: 10.1111/cod.13148] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2018] [Revised: 09/25/2018] [Accepted: 09/26/2018] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Healthcare workers (HCWs) are at high risk of developing hand dermatitis (HD). Current guidelines on HD prevention recommend the use of emollients; however, in practice, adherence is poor. OBJECTIVE To assess whether the provision of creams, electronic monitoring and feedback on cream consumption can improve skin care in HCWs. METHODS A cluster randomized controlled trial was conducted on 19 academic hospital wards, including 501 HCWs, for 12 months. The intervention wards (n = 9; 285 HCWs) were provided with hand cream dispensers equipped with an electronic system to monitor use, which was regularly communicated to the HCWs by the use of posters. The process outcomes were self-reported cream consumption in both groups, and electronically measured consumption per ward in the intervention group (IG) vs the control group (CG). RESULTS Self-reported cream use at follow-up was significantly higher in the IG than in the CG, before (odds ratio [OR] 2.27; 95%CI: 1.29-3.97; P = 0.004) and during (OR 3.30; 95%CI: 1.80-6.06, P < 0.001) the shift, whereas at baseline there was no difference between the groups. In the IG, electronically measured cream use was, on average, 0.4 events per shift per HCW. CONCLUSION The intervention improved hand cream use, and may therefore be considered as a practical strategy to promote skin care in HCWs. Notwithstanding this, the application frequency remained lower than recommended in the present study and current guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maryam Soltanipoor
- Coronel Institute of Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research InstituteAmsterdam UMCAmsterdamThe Netherlands
- Department of DermatologyAmsterdam UMCAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | | | - Judith K. Sluiter
- Coronel Institute of Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research InstituteAmsterdam UMCAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - John Hines
- Department of R&D, SC Johnson Professional LtdDenbyUK
| | - Federico Frison
- Clinical Unit of Occupational Medicine, Department of Medical SciencesUniversity of TriesteTriesteItaly
| | - Sanja Kezic
- Coronel Institute of Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research InstituteAmsterdam UMCAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Hamnerius N, Svedman C, Bergendorff O, Björk J, Bruze M, Pontén A. Wet work exposure and hand eczema among healthcare workers: a cross-sectional study. Br J Dermatol 2017; 178:452-461. [DOI: 10.1111/bjd.15813] [Citation(s) in RCA: 72] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/11/2017] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- N. Hamnerius
- Department of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology; Lund University; Skåne University Hospital; Malmö Sweden
| | - C. Svedman
- Department of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology; Lund University; Skåne University Hospital; Malmö Sweden
| | - O. Bergendorff
- Department of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology; Lund University; Skåne University Hospital; Malmö Sweden
| | - J. Björk
- Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine; Lund University; Lund Sweden
- Clinical Studies Sweden; Forum South; Skåne University Hospital; Lund Sweden
| | - M. Bruze
- Department of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology; Lund University; Skåne University Hospital; Malmö Sweden
| | - A. Pontén
- Department of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology; Lund University; Skåne University Hospital; Malmö Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Qin R, Lampel HP. Review of Occupational Contact Dermatitis—Top Allergens, Best Avoidance Measures. CURRENT TREATMENT OPTIONS IN ALLERGY 2015. [DOI: 10.1007/s40521-015-0063-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
|