1
|
Western B, Ivarsson A, Vistad I, Demmelmaier I, Aaronson NK, Radcliffe G, van Beurden M, Bohus M, Courneya KS, Daley AJ, Galvão DA, Garrod R, Goedendorp MM, Griffith KA, van Harten WH, Hayes SC, Herrero-Roman F, Hiensch AE, Irwin ML, James E, Kenkhuis MF, Kersten MJ, Knoop H, Lucia A, May AM, McConnachie A, van Mechelen W, Mutrie N, Newton RU, Nollet F, Oldenburg HS, Plotnikoff R, Schmidt ME, Schmitz KH, Schulz KH, Short CE, Sonke GS, Steindorf K, Stuiver MM, Taaffe DR, Thorsen L, Velthuis MJ, Wenzel J, Winters-Stone KM, Wiskemann J, Berntsen S, Buffart LM. Dropout from exercise trials among cancer survivors-An individual patient data meta-analysis from the POLARIS study. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2024; 34:e14575. [PMID: 38339809 DOI: 10.1111/sms.14575] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2023] [Revised: 01/04/2024] [Accepted: 01/25/2024] [Indexed: 02/12/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The number of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the effects of exercise among cancer survivors has increased in recent years; however, participants dropping out of the trials are rarely described. The objective of the present study was to assess which combinations of participant and exercise program characteristics were associated with dropout from the exercise arms of RCTs among cancer survivors. METHODS This study used data collected in the Predicting OptimaL cAncer RehabIlitation and Supportive care (POLARIS) study, an international database of RCTs investigating the effects of exercise among cancer survivors. Thirty-four exercise trials, with a total of 2467 patients without metastatic disease randomized to an exercise arm were included. Harmonized studies included a pre and a posttest, and participants were classified as dropouts when missing all assessments at the post-intervention test. Subgroups were identified with a conditional inference tree. RESULTS Overall, 9.6% of the participants dropped out. Five subgroups were identified in the conditional inference tree based on four significant associations with dropout. Most dropout was observed for participants with BMI >28.4 kg/m2 , performing supervised resistance or unsupervised mixed exercise (19.8% dropout) or had low-medium education and performed aerobic or supervised mixed exercise (13.5%). The lowest dropout was found for participants with BMI >28.4 kg/m2 and high education performing aerobic or supervised mixed exercise (5.1%), and participants with BMI ≤28.4 kg/m2 exercising during (5.2%) or post (9.5%) treatment. CONCLUSIONS There are several systematic differences between cancer survivors completing and dropping out from exercise trials, possibly affecting the external validity of exercise effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benedikte Western
- Department of Sport Science and Physical Education, University of Agder, Kristiansand, Norway
| | - Andreas Ivarsson
- Centre of Research on Welfare, Health and Sport, Halmstad University, Halmstad, Sweden
| | - Ingvild Vistad
- Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sørlandet Hospital, Kristiansand, Norway
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Ingrid Demmelmaier
- Department of Sport Science and Physical Education, University of Agder, Kristiansand, Norway
- Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Neil K Aaronson
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Gillian Radcliffe
- Lane Fox Respiratory Research Unit, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Marc van Beurden
- Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Martin Bohus
- Institute of Psychiatric and Psychosomatic Psychotherapy, Central Institute of Mental Health, Mannheim, Germany
- Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
- Faculty of Health, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Kerry S Courneya
- Faculty of Kinesiology, Sport, and Recreation, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Amanda J Daley
- Centre for Lifestyle Medicine and Behaviour (CLiMB), The School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK
| | - Daniel A Galvão
- Exercise Medicine Research Institute, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Rachel Garrod
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Martine M Goedendorp
- Department of Psychology, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
- Department of Health Psychology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Wim H van Harten
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Sandi C Hayes
- School of Public Health, Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Queensland, Australia
| | | | - Anouk E Hiensch
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Erica James
- School of Medicine & Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Marlou-Floor Kenkhuis
- Department of Medical BioSciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Marie José Kersten
- Department of Hematology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Cancer Center Amsterdam and LYMMCARE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hans Knoop
- Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Anne M May
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Alex McConnachie
- School of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Willem van Mechelen
- Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Faculty of Health and Behavioural Sciences, School of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
- Department of Human Biology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
- UCD School of Public Health, Physiotherapy and Sports Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Nanette Mutrie
- Physical Activity for Health Research Center, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Robert U Newton
- Exercise Medicine Research Institute, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Frans Nollet
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Rehabilitation & Development, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hester S Oldenburg
- Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ron Plotnikoff
- Priority Research Centre for Physical Activity and Nutrition, the University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Martina E Schmidt
- Division of Physical Activity, Prevention and Cancer, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Disease (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Karl-Heinz Schulz
- Competence Center for Sports- and Exercise Medicine (Athleticum) and Institute for Medical Psychology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Camille E Short
- Melbourne Centre for Behaviour Change, Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
- Cancer and Exercise Recovery Research Group (CanRex), Melbourne School of Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Gabe S Sonke
- Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Karen Steindorf
- Division of Physical Activity, Prevention and Cancer, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Disease (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Martijn M Stuiver
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Dennis R Taaffe
- Exercise Medicine Research Institute, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Lene Thorsen
- National Advisory Unit on Late Effects after Cancer Treatment, Department of Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Clinical Service, Division of Cancer Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Miranda J Velthuis
- Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Jennifer Wenzel
- Johns Hopkins School of Nursing, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | | | - Joachim Wiskemann
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) Heidelberg and Heidelberg University Clinic, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sveinung Berntsen
- Department of Sport Science and Physical Education, University of Agder, Kristiansand, Norway
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hiensch AE, Beckhaus J, Witlox L, Monninkhof EM, Schagen SB, van Vulpen JK, Sweegers MG, Newton RU, Aaronson NK, Galvão DA, Steindorf K, Stuiver MM, Mesters I, Knoop H, Goedendorp MM, Bohus M, Thorsen L, Schulz KH, Schmidt ME, Ulrich CM, Sonke GS, van Harten WH, Winters-Stone KM, Velthuis MJ, Taaffe DR, van Mechelen W, Kersten MJ, Nollet F, Wiskemann J, Buffart LM, May AM. Moderators of exercise effects on self-reported cognitive functioning in cancer survivors: an individual participant data meta-analysis. J Cancer Surviv 2023:10.1007/s11764-023-01392-3. [PMID: 37160571 DOI: 10.1007/s11764-023-01392-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2023] [Accepted: 04/25/2023] [Indexed: 05/11/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE This individual participant data meta-analysis (IPD-MA) assesses exercise effects on self-reported cognitive functioning (CF) and investigates whether effects differ by patient-, intervention-, and exercise-related characteristics. METHODS IPD from 16 exercise RCTs, including 1987 patients across multiple types of non-metastatic cancer, was pooled. A one-stage IPD-MA using linear mixed-effect models was performed to assess exercise effects on self-reported CF (z-score) and to identify whether the effect was moderated by sociodemographic, clinical, intervention- and exercise-related characteristics, or fatigue, depression, anxiety, and self-reported CF levels at start of the intervention (i.e., baseline). Models were adjusted for baseline CF and included a random intercept at study level to account for clustering of patients within studies. A sensitivity analysis was performed in patients who reported cognitive problems at baseline. RESULTS Minimal significant beneficial exercise effects on self-reported CF (β=-0.09 [-0.16; -0.02]) were observed, with slightly larger effects when the intervention was delivered post-treatment (n=745, β=-0.13 [-0.24; -0.02]), and no significant effect during cancer treatment (n=1,162, β=-0.08 [-0.18; 0.02]). Larger effects were observed in interventions of 12 weeks or shorter (β=-0.14 [-0.25; -0.04]) or 24 weeks or longer (β=-0.18 [-0.32; -0.02]), whereas no effects were observed in interventions of 12-24 weeks (β=0.01 [-0.13; 0.15]). Exercise interventions were most beneficial when provided to patients without anxiety symptoms (β=-0.10 [-0.19; -0.02]) or after completion of treatment in patients with cognitive problems (β=-0.19 [-0.31; -0.06]). No other significant moderators were identified. CONCLUSIONS This cross-cancer IPD meta-analysis observed small beneficial exercise effects on self-reported CF when the intervention was delivered post-treatment, especially in patients who reported cognitive problems at baseline. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS This study provides some evidence to support the prescription of exercise to improve cognitive functioning. Sufficiently powered trials are warranted to make more definitive recommendations and include these in the exercise guidelines for cancer survivors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anouk E Hiensch
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Julia Beckhaus
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Lenja Witlox
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Evelyn M Monninkhof
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Sanne B Schagen
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jonna K van Vulpen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Maike G Sweegers
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology & Center for Quality of Life, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Robert U Newton
- Exercise Medicine Research Institute, Edith Cowan University, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Neil K Aaronson
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Daniel A Galvão
- Exercise Medicine Research Institute, Edith Cowan University, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Karen Steindorf
- Division of Physical Activity, Prevention and Cancer, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Martijn M Stuiver
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology & Center for Quality of Life, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ilse Mesters
- Department of Epidemiology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Hans Knoop
- Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Martine M Goedendorp
- Department of Health Psychology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
- Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Martin Bohus
- Institute of Psychiatric and Psychosomatic Psychotherapy, Central Institute of Mental Health, Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
- Faculty of Health, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Lene Thorsen
- National Advisory Unit on Late Effects after Cancer, Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Clinical Service, Division of Cancer Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Karl-Heinz Schulz
- Athleticum - Competence Center for Sports- and Exercise Medicine and Institute for Medical Psychology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Martina E Schmidt
- Division of Physical Activity, Prevention and Cancer, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Cornelia M Ulrich
- Huntsman Cancer Institute and Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, USA
| | - Gabe S Sonke
- Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Wim H van Harten
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Health Technology and Services Research, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Kerri M Winters-Stone
- Division of Oncological Sciences, Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Miranda J Velthuis
- Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Dennis R Taaffe
- Exercise Medicine Research Institute, Edith Cowan University, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Willem van Mechelen
- Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, location: Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- School of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, Faculty of Health and Behavioural Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
- Division of Exercise Science and Sports Medicine (ESSM), Department of Human Biology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
- School of Public Health, Physiotherapy and Population Sciences, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Marie José Kersten
- Department of Hematology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Frans Nollet
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Rehabilitation & Development, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Joachim Wiskemann
- Working Group Exercise Oncology, Division of Medical Oncology, University Clinic Heidelberg and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Laurien M Buffart
- Exercise Medicine Research Institute, Edith Cowan University, Perth, WA, Australia.
- Department of Physiology, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - Anne M May
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lingens SP, Hagedoorn M, Zhu L, Ranchor AV, van der Lee M, Garssen B, Schroevers MJ, Sanderman R, Goedendorp MM. Trajectories of fatigue in cancer patients during psychological care. Psychol Health 2021; 37:1002-1021. [PMID: 33985383 DOI: 10.1080/08870446.2021.1916493] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Psycho-oncological institutions offer specialized care for cancer patients. Little is known how this care might impact fatigue. This study aimed to identify fatigue trajectories during psychological care, examined factors distinguishing these trajectories and predicted fatigue severity after nine months of psychological care. DESIGN Naturalistic, longitudinal study of 238 cancer patients receiving psycho-oncological care in the Netherlands. Data were collected before initiation of psychological care (T1) and three (T2) and nine months (T3) afterwards. Latent class growth analysis, repeated measure analyses (RMA) and linear regression analysis were performed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Fatigue severity: Checklist Individual Strength. RESULTS Three fatigue trajectories were identified: high- (30%), moderate- (62%) and low-level fatigue (8%). While statistically significant decreases in fatigue were found, this decrease was not clinically relevant. RMA showed main effects for time for fatigue trajectories on depression, anxiety, personal control and illness cognitions. Fatigue severity and physical symptoms at T1, but not demographic or clinical factors, were predictive of fatigue severity at T3. CONCLUSIONS Fatigue is very common during psycho-oncological care, and notably not clinically improving. As symptoms of fatigue, depression, anxiety and physical symptoms often cluster, supplementary fatigue treatment should be considered when it is decided to treat other symptoms first.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Solveigh P Lingens
- Department of Health Psychology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Mariët Hagedoorn
- Department of Health Psychology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Lei Zhu
- Department of Health Psychology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Adelita V Ranchor
- Department of Health Psychology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Marije van der Lee
- Centre for Psycho-Oncology, Helen Dowling Institute, Bilthoven, The Netherlands
| | - Bert Garssen
- Department of Health Psychology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.,Centre for Psycho-Oncology, Helen Dowling Institute, Bilthoven, The Netherlands
| | - Maya J Schroevers
- Department of Health Psychology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Robbert Sanderman
- Department of Health Psychology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Martine M Goedendorp
- Department of Health Psychology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Abrahams HJG, Knoop H, Schreurs M, Aaronson NK, Jacobsen PB, Newton RU, Courneya KS, Aitken JF, Arving C, Brandberg Y, Chambers SK, Gielissen MFM, Glimelius B, Goedendorp MM, Graves KD, Heiney SP, Horne R, Hunter MS, Johansson B, Northouse LL, Oldenburg HSA, Prins JB, Savard J, van Beurden M, van den Berg SW, Verdonck-de Leeuw IM, Buffart LM. Moderators of the effect of psychosocial interventions on fatigue in women with breast cancer and men with prostate cancer: Individual patient data meta-analyses. Psychooncology 2020; 29:1772-1785. [PMID: 33448521 DOI: 10.1002/pon.5522] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2020] [Revised: 07/05/2020] [Accepted: 07/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Psychosocial interventions can reduce cancer-related fatigue effectively. However, it is still unclear if intervention effects differ across subgroups of patients. These meta-analyses aimed at evaluating moderator effects of (a) sociodemographic characteristics, (b) clinical characteristics, (c) baseline levels of fatigue and other symptoms, and (d) intervention-related characteristics on the effect of psychosocial interventions on cancer-related fatigue in patients with non-metastatic breast and prostate cancer. METHODS Data were retrieved from the Predicting OptimaL cAncer RehabIlitation and Supportive care (POLARIS) consortium. Potential moderators were studied with meta-analyses of pooled individual patient data from 14 randomized controlled trials through linear mixed-effects models with interaction tests. The analyses were conducted separately in patients with breast (n = 1091) and prostate cancer (n = 1008). RESULTS Statistically significant, small overall effects of psychosocial interventions on fatigue were found (breast cancer: β = -0.19 [95% confidence interval (95%CI) = -0.30; -0.08]; prostate cancer: β = -0.11 [95%CI = -0.21; -0.00]). In both patient groups, intervention effects did not differ significantly by sociodemographic or clinical characteristics, nor by baseline levels of fatigue or pain. For intervention-related moderators (only tested among women with breast cancer), statistically significant larger effects were found for cognitive behavioral therapy as intervention strategy (β = -0.27 [95%CI = -0.40; -0.15]), fatigue-specific interventions (β = -0.48 [95%CI = -0.79; -0.18]), and interventions that only targeted patients with clinically relevant fatigue (β = -0.85 [95%CI = -1.40; -0.30]). CONCLUSIONS Our findings did not provide evidence that any selected demographic or clinical characteristic, or baseline levels of fatigue or pain, moderated effects of psychosocial interventions on fatigue. A specific focus on decreasing fatigue seems beneficial for patients with breast cancer with clinically relevant fatigue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harriët J G Abrahams
- Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hans Knoop
- Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maartje Schreurs
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Neil K Aaronson
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Paul B Jacobsen
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Science, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Robert U Newton
- Exercise Medicine Research Institute, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Kerry S Courneya
- Faculty of Kinesiology, Sport, and Recreation, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Joanne F Aitken
- Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Southport, Queensland, Australia.,Cancer Council Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.,Institute for Resilient Regions, University of Southern Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.,School of Public Health, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Cecilia Arving
- Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Yvonne Brandberg
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Suzanne K Chambers
- Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Southport, Queensland, Australia.,Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Institute for Resilient Regions, University of Southern Queensland, Springfield, Queensland, Australia.,Health and Wellness Institute, Edith Cowan University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | | | - Bengt Glimelius
- Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Martine M Goedendorp
- Department of Health Science, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Health Psychology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Kristi D Graves
- Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Sue P Heiney
- College of Nursing, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA
| | - Rob Horne
- UCL School of Pharmacy, University College London, London, UK
| | - Myra S Hunter
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Birgitta Johansson
- Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | | | - Hester S A Oldenburg
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van, Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Judith B Prins
- Department of Medical Psychology, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud, Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Josée Savard
- School of Psychology, Université Laval and Laval University Cancer Research Center, Quebec City, Québec, Canada
| | - Marc van Beurden
- Department of Gynecology, Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Irma M Verdonck-de Leeuw
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Clinical, Neuro- and Developmental Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Laurien M Buffart
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Exercise Medicine Research Institute, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Western Australia, Australia.,Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Physiology, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
VAN Vulpen JK, Sweegers MG, Peeters PHM, Courneya KS, Newton RU, Aaronson NK, Jacobsen PB, Galvão DA, Chinapaw MJ, Steindorf K, Irwin ML, Stuiver MM, Hayes S, Griffith KA, Mesters I, Knoop H, Goedendorp MM, Mutrie N, Daley AJ, McConnachie A, Bohus M, Thorsen L, Schulz KH, Short CE, James EL, Plotnikoff RC, Schmidt ME, Ulrich CM, VAN Beurden M, Oldenburg HS, Sonke GS, VAN Harten WH, Schmitz KH, Winters-Stone KM, Velthuis MJ, Taaffe DR, VAN Mechelen W, Kersten MJ, Nollet F, Wenzel J, Wiskemann J, Verdonck-DE Leeuw IM, Brug J, May AM, Buffart LM. Moderators of Exercise Effects on Cancer-related Fatigue: A Meta-analysis of Individual Patient Data. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2020; 52:303-314. [PMID: 31524827 DOI: 10.1249/mss.0000000000002154] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Fatigue is a common and potentially disabling symptom in patients with cancer. It can often be effectively reduced by exercise. Yet, effects of exercise interventions might differ across subgroups. We conducted a meta-analysis using individual patient data of randomized controlled trials (RCT) to investigate moderators of exercise intervention effects on cancer-related fatigue. METHODS We used individual patient data from 31 exercise RCT worldwide, representing 4366 patients, of whom 3846 had complete fatigue data. We performed a one-step individual patient data meta-analysis, using linear mixed-effect models to analyze the effects of exercise interventions on fatigue (z score) and to identify demographic, clinical, intervention- and exercise-related moderators. Models were adjusted for baseline fatigue and included a random intercept on study level to account for clustering of patients within studies. We identified potential moderators by testing their interaction with group allocation, using a likelihood ratio test. RESULTS Exercise interventions had statistically significant beneficial effects on fatigue (β = -0.17; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.22 to -0.12). There was no evidence of moderation by demographic or clinical characteristics. Supervised exercise interventions had significantly larger effects on fatigue than unsupervised exercise interventions (βdifference = -0.18; 95% CI -0.28 to -0.08). Supervised interventions with a duration ≤12 wk showed larger effects on fatigue (β = -0.29; 95% CI, -0.39 to -0.20) than supervised interventions with a longer duration. CONCLUSIONS In this individual patient data meta-analysis, we found statistically significant beneficial effects of exercise interventions on fatigue, irrespective of demographic and clinical characteristics. These findings support a role for exercise, preferably supervised exercise interventions, in clinical practice. Reasons for differential effects in duration require further exploration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonna K VAN Vulpen
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, THE NETHERLANDS
| | | | - Petra H M Peeters
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, THE NETHERLANDS
| | - Kerry S Courneya
- Faculty of Kinesiology, Sport and Recreation, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, CANADA
| | - Robert U Newton
- Exercise Medicine Research Institute, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA, AUSTRALIA
| | - Neil K Aaronson
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, THE NETHERLANDS
| | - Paul B Jacobsen
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Daniel A Galvão
- Exercise Medicine Research Institute, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA, AUSTRALIA
| | - Mai J Chinapaw
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, THE NETHERLANDS
| | - Karen Steindorf
- Division of Physical Activity, Prevention and Cancer, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, GERMANY
| | | | - Martijn M Stuiver
- Center for Quality of Life, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, THE NETHERLANDS
| | - Sandi Hayes
- School of Public Health, Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, QLD, AUSTRALIA
| | | | - Ilse Mesters
- Department of Epidemiology, Maastricht University, THE NETHERLANDS
| | - Hans Knoop
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam, THE NETHERLANDS
| | | | - Nanette Mutrie
- Physical Activity for Health Research Center, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UNITED KINGDOM
| | - Amanda J Daley
- School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, University of Loughborough, Loughborough, Leicestershire, UNITED KINGDOM
| | - Alex McConnachie
- Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UNITED KINGDOM
| | | | | | - Karl-Heinz Schulz
- Athleticum-Competence Center for Sports- and Exercise Medicine and Institute for Medical Psychology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, GERMANY
| | - Camille E Short
- Freemasons Foundation Centre of Men's Health, School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, SA, AUSTRALIA
| | - Erica L James
- School of Medicine & Public Health, the University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, AUSTRALIA
| | - Ronald C Plotnikoff
- Priority Research Centre for Physical Activity and Nutrition, the University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, AUSTRALIA
| | - Martina E Schmidt
- Division of Physical Activity, Prevention and Cancer, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, GERMANY
| | - Cornelia M Ulrich
- Huntsman Cancer Institute and Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | | | | | - Gabe S Sonke
- Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, THE NETHERLANDS
| | | | - Kathryn H Schmitz
- Department of Public Health Science, College of Medicine and Cancer Institute, Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, PA
| | - Kerri M Winters-Stone
- Knight Cancer Institute, School of Nursing, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR
| | - Miranda J Velthuis
- Netherlands comprehensive cancer organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, THE NETHERLANDS
| | - Dennis R Taaffe
- Exercise Medicine Research Institute, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA, AUSTRALIA
| | - Willem VAN Mechelen
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, THE NETHERLANDS
| | - Marie José Kersten
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Hematology, Amsterdam, THE NETHERLANDS
| | - Frans Nollet
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam Department of Rehabilitation, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam, THE NETHERLANDS
| | - Jennifer Wenzel
- Johns Hopkins School of Nursing, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD
| | | | | | | | - Anne M May
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, THE NETHERLANDS
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Buffart LM, Schreurs MAC, Abrahams HJG, Kalter J, Aaronson NK, Jacobsen PB, Newton RU, Courneya KS, Armes J, Arving C, Braamse AM, Brandberg Y, Dekker J, Ferguson RJ, Gielissen MF, Glimelius B, Goedendorp MM, Graves KD, Heiney SP, Horne R, Hunter MS, Johansson B, Northouse LL, Oldenburg HS, Prins JB, Savard J, van Beurden M, van den Berg SW, Brug J, Knoop H, Verdonck-de Leeuw IM. Effects and moderators of coping skills training on symptoms of depression and anxiety in patients with cancer: Aggregate data and individual patient data meta-analyses. Clin Psychol Rev 2020; 80:101882. [PMID: 32640368 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2020.101882] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2019] [Revised: 05/21/2020] [Accepted: 06/11/2020] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study evaluated the effects of coping skills training (CST) on symptoms of depression and anxiety in cancer patients, and investigated moderators of the effects. METHODS Overall effects and intervention-related moderators were studied in meta-analyses of pooled aggregate data from 38 randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Patient-related moderators were examined using linear mixed-effect models with interaction tests on pooled individual patient data (n = 1953) from 15 of the RCTs. RESULTS CST had a statistically significant but small effect on depression (g = -0.31,95% confidence interval (CI) = -0.40;-0.22) and anxiety (g = -0.32,95%CI = -0.41;-0.24) symptoms. Effects on depression symptoms were significantly larger for interventions delivered face-to-face (p = .003), led by a psychologist (p = .02) and targeted to patients with psychological distress (p = .002). Significantly larger reductions in anxiety symptoms were found in younger patients (pinteraction < 0.025), with the largest reductions in patients <50 years (β = -0.31,95%CI = -0.44;-0.18) and no significant effects in patients ≥70 years. Effects of CST on depression (β = -0.16,95%CI = -0.25;-0.07) and anxiety (β = -0.24,95%CI = -0.33;-0.14) symptoms were significant in patients who received chemotherapy but not in patients who did not (pinteraction < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS CST significantly reduced symptoms of depression and anxiety in cancer patients, and particularly when delivered face-to-face, provided by a psychologist, targeted to patients with psychological distress, and given to patients who were younger and received chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L M Buffart
- Department of Physiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Exercise Medicine Research Institute, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA, Australia.
| | - M A C Schreurs
- Department of Medical Oncology, Family Cancer Clinic, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - H J G Abrahams
- Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - J Kalter
- Division of Human Nutrition and Health, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
| | - N K Aaronson
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - P B Jacobsen
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Science, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, Florida, USA.
| | - R U Newton
- Exercise Medicine Research Institute, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA, Australia.
| | - K S Courneya
- Faculty of Kinesiology, Sport, and Recreation, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
| | - J Armes
- School of Health Science, University of Surrey, Surrey, UK.
| | - C Arving
- Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
| | - A M Braamse
- Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Y Brandberg
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
| | - J Dekker
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - R J Ferguson
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
| | | | - B Glimelius
- Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
| | - M M Goedendorp
- Department of Health Science, Faculty of Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Health Psychology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
| | - K D Graves
- Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.
| | - S P Heiney
- College of Nursing, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.
| | - R Horne
- UCL School of Pharmacy, University College London, London, UK.
| | - M S Hunter
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
| | - B Johansson
- Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
| | - L L Northouse
- University of Michigan School of Nursing, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
| | - H S Oldenburg
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - J B Prins
- Department of Medical Psychology, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute of Health Sciences, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
| | - J Savard
- School of Psychology, Université Laval and Laval University Cancer Research Center, Québec, QC, Canada.
| | - M van Beurden
- Department of Gynecology, Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - S W van den Berg
- Department of Medical Psychology, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute of Health Sciences, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
| | - J Brug
- National Institute of Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, the Netherlands.
| | - H Knoop
- Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - I M Verdonck-de Leeuw
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery and Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Clinical, Neuro- and Developmental Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Bernard P, Savard J, Steindorf K, Sweegers MG, Courneya KS, Newton RU, Aaronson NK, Jacobsen PB, May AM, Galvao DA, Chinapaw MJ, Stuiver MM, Griffith KA, Mesters I, Knoop H, Goedendorp MM, Bohus M, Thorsen L, Schmidt ME, Ulrich CM, Sonke GS, van Harten W, Winters-Stone KM, Velthuis MJ, Taaffe DR, van Mechelen W, Kersten MJ, Nollet F, Wenzel J, Wiskemann J, Verdonck-de Leeuw IM, Brug J, Buffart LM. Effects and moderators of exercise on sleep in adults with cancer: Individual patient data and aggregated meta-analyses. J Psychosom Res 2019; 124:109746. [PMID: 31443811 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2019.109746] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2019] [Revised: 06/14/2019] [Accepted: 06/16/2019] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate the effects of exercise interventions on sleep disturbances and sleep quality in patients with mixed cancer diagnoses, and identify demographic, clinical, and intervention-related moderators of these effects. METHODS Individual patient data (IPD) and aggregated meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Using data from the Predicting OptimaL cAncer RehabIlitation and Supportive care project, IPD of 2173 adults (mean age = 54.8) with cancer from 17 RCTs were analyzed. A complementary systematic search was conducted (until November 2018) to study the overall effects and test the representativeness of analyzed IPD. Effect sizes of exercise effects on self-reported sleep outcomes were calculated for all included RCTs. Linear mixed-effect models were used to evaluate the effects of exercise on post-intervention outcome values, adjusting for baseline values. Moderator effects were studied by testing interactions for demographic, clinical and intervention-related characteristics. RESULTS For all 27 eligible RCTs from the updated search, exercise interventions significantly decreased sleep disturbances in adults with cancer (g = -0.09, 95% CI [-0.16; -0.02]). No significant effect was obtained for sleep quality. RCTs included in IPD analyses constituted a representative sample of the published literature. The intervention effects on sleep disturbances were not significantly moderated by any demographic, clinical, or intervention-related factor, nor by sleep disturbances. CONCLUSIONS This meta-analysis provides some evidence that, compared to control conditions, exercise interventions may improve sleep disturbances, but not sleep quality, in cancer patients, although this effect is of a small magnitude. Among the investigated variables, none was found to significantly moderate the effect of exercise interventions on sleep disturbances.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Bernard
- Université Laval Cancer Research Center, Québec, Québec, Canada; School of Psychology, Université Laval, Québec, Québec, Canada; CHU de Québec - Université Laval Research Center, Québec, Québec, Canada; Physical Activity Sciences Department, Université du Québec à Montréal, Montréal, Quebec, Canada; Research centre, University Institute of Mental Health at Montreal, Montréal, Quebec, Canada.
| | - J Savard
- Université Laval Cancer Research Center, Québec, Québec, Canada; School of Psychology, Université Laval, Québec, Québec, Canada; CHU de Québec - Université Laval Research Center, Québec, Québec, Canada
| | - K Steindorf
- Division of Physical Activity, Prevention and Cancer, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Disease (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - M G Sweegers
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - K S Courneya
- Faculty of Physical Education and Recreation, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - R U Newton
- Exercise Medicine Research Institute, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA, Australia
| | - N K Aaronson
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - P B Jacobsen
- Division of Population Science, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - A M May
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - D A Galvao
- Exercise Medicine Research Institute, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA, Australia
| | - M J Chinapaw
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M M Stuiver
- Department of Physiotherapy, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - K A Griffith
- School of Nursing, University of Maryland, Baltimore, USA
| | - I Mesters
- Department of Epidemiology, Maastricht University, The Netherlands
| | - H Knoop
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M M Goedendorp
- Department of Health Psychology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands; Institute of Psychiatric and Psychosomatic Psychotherapy, Central Institute of Mental Health, Heidelberg t University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - M Bohus
- Institute of Psychiatric and Psychosomatic Psychotherapy, Central Institute of Mental Health, Heidelberg t University, Mannheim, Germany; Faculty of Health, University of Antwerp, Belgium
| | - L Thorsen
- National Advisory Unit on Late Effects after Cancer, Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - M E Schmidt
- Division of Physical Activity, Prevention and Cancer, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Disease (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - C M Ulrich
- Huntsman Cancer Institute and University of Utah, Department of Population Health Sciences, Salt Lake City, USA
| | - G S Sonke
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Division of Population Science, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - W van Harten
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Huntsman Cancer Institute and University of Utah, Department of Population Health Sciences, Salt Lake City, USA
| | | | - M J Velthuis
- Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - D R Taaffe
- Exercise Medicine Research Institute, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA, Australia
| | - W van Mechelen
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M J Kersten
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Hematology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - F Nollet
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J Wenzel
- Johns Hopkins School of Nursing, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, USA
| | - J Wiskemann
- Division of Medical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) and Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - I M Verdonck-de Leeuw
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The Netherlands; Department of Clinical Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J Brug
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands
| | - L M Buffart
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kuiper D, Steverink N, Stewart RE, Reijneveld SA, Sanderman R, Goedendorp MM. Pace and determinants of implementation of the self-management of well-being group intervention: a multilevel observational study. BMC Health Serv Res 2019; 19:67. [PMID: 30683092 PMCID: PMC6346574 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-019-3891-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2018] [Accepted: 01/09/2019] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Background When implementing an empirically supported intervention (ESI) arrays of influencing factors operate on the professional and organizational level, but so far dependency between these levels has often been ignored. The aim of this study is to describe the pace and identify determinants of implementation of the Self-Management of Well-being (SMW) group intervention while taking the dependency between professionals and organizations into account. Methods Pace of implementation was measured as the time between training of professionals and first use of the SMW intervention in months. Determinants of first use were derived from the Fleuren framework and assessed using web-based questionnaires and telephone interviews. First, univariate analyses, Fisher’s exact tests and t-tests, were performed to identify determinants of first use of the SMW intervention on the individual professional and the organizational level independently. Second, multilevel analyses were performed to correct for the dependency between professionals and organizations. Simple multilevel logistic regression analyses were performed with determinants found significant in the univariate analyses as independent variables, first use as dependent variable, professionals entered in the first level, and organizations in the second level. Results Forty-eight professionals from 18 organizations were trained to execute the SMW intervention. Thirty-two professionals achieved first use, at a mean pace of 7.5 months ± 4.2. Determinants on the professional level were ‘ownership’, ‘relative advantage’, ‘support from colleagues’ and ‘compatibility’. Determinants on the organizational level were ‘organizational size’ and ‘innovation-task orientation fit’. Multilevel analysis showed that ‘compatibility’, a factor on the professional level, was the only significant determinant contributing to first use in the multilevel model. Conclusions This implementation study revealed a strong dependency between professionals and organizations. Results showed that a majority of professionals used the SMW intervention in about 8 months. When the dependency between professionals and organization was taken into account, the professionals’ perception of compatibility was the only remaining determinant of implementation on the professional level. Organizational size and managers’ perception of ‘innovation-task orientation fit’ were determinants of implementation on the organizational level. It is advisable to discuss the compatibility between new and current tasks among managers and professionals before adopting a new intervention. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12913-019-3891-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daphne Kuiper
- Service Desk Clinical Research Office, UMC staff, University Medical Center Groningen, P.O. Box 30.001, AB41, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands.,Department of Health Psychology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, P.O. Box 196, FA12, 9700 AD, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Nardi Steverink
- Department of Health Psychology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, P.O. Box 196, FA12, 9700 AD, Groningen, The Netherlands.,Department of Sociology, University of Groningen, Grote Rozenstraat 31, 9712 TG, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Roy E Stewart
- Department of Health Sciences, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, P.O. Box 196, FA10, 9700 AD, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Sijmen A Reijneveld
- Department of Health Sciences, (Community & Occupational Medicine) University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, P.O. Box 196, FA10, 9700 AD, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Robbert Sanderman
- Department of Health Psychology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, P.O. Box 196, FA12, 9700 AD, Groningen, The Netherlands.,Department of Psychology, Health & Technology, University of Twente, P.O. Box 217, 7500 AE, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Martine M Goedendorp
- Department of Health Psychology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, P.O. Box 196, FA12, 9700 AD, Groningen, The Netherlands. .,Department of Health Science, Faculty of Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, De Boelelaan 1105, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Menting J, Tack CJ, Bleijenberg G, Donders R, Droogleever Fortuyn HA, Fransen J, Goedendorp MM, Kalkman JS, Strik-Albers R, van Alfen N, van der Werf SP, Voermans NC, van Engelen BG, Knoop H. Is fatigue a disease-specific or generic symptom in chronic medical conditions? Health Psychol 2018; 37:530-543. [PMID: 29781654 DOI: 10.1037/hea0000598] [Citation(s) in RCA: 72] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Severe fatigue is highly prevalent in various chronic diseases. Disease-specific fatigue models have been developed, but it is possible that fatigue-related factors in these models are similar across diseases. The purpose of the current study was to determine the amount of variance in fatigue severity explained by: (a) the specific disease, (b) factors associated with fatigue across different chronic diseases (transdiagnostic factors), and (c) the interactions between these factors and specific diseases. METHOD Data from 15 studies that included 1696 patients with common chronic diseases and disorders that cause long-term disabilities were analyzed. Linear regression analysis with the generalized least-squares technique was used to determine fatigue-related factors associated with fatigue severity, that is, demographic variables, health-related symptoms and psychosocial variables. RESULTS Type of chronic disease explained 11% of the variance noted in fatigue severity. The explained variance increased to 55% when the transdiagnostic factors were added to the model. These factors were female sex, age, motivational and concentration problems, pain, sleep disturbances, physical functioning, reduced activity and lower self-efficacy concerning fatigue. The predicted variance increased to 61% when interaction terms were added. Analysis of the interactions revealed that the relationship between fatigue severity and relevant predictors mainly differed in strength, not in direction. CONCLUSIONS Fatigue severity can largely be explained by transdiagnostic factors; the associations vary between chronic diseases in strength and significance. This suggests that severely fatigued patients with different chronic diseases can probably benefit from a transdiagnostic fatigue-approach which focuses on individual patient needs rather than a specific disease. (PsycINFO Database Record
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juliane Menting
- Expert Center for Chronic Fatigue, Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, VU University Medical Center
| | - Cees J Tack
- Department of Internal Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center
| | - Gijs Bleijenberg
- Expert Center for Chronic Fatigue, Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, VU University Medical Center
| | - Rogier Donders
- Department of Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Center
| | | | - Jaap Fransen
- Department of Rheumatology, Radboud University Medical Center
| | | | - Joke S Kalkman
- Department of Medical Psychology, Radboud University Medical Center
| | | | - Nens van Alfen
- Neuromuscular Centre Nijmegen, Department of Neurology, Donders Center for Neuroscience, Radboud University Medical Center
| | | | - Nicol C Voermans
- Neuromuscular Centre Nijmegen, Department of Neurology, Donders Center for Neuroscience, Radboud University Medical Center
| | - Baziel G van Engelen
- Neuromuscular Centre Nijmegen, Department of Neurology, Donders Center for Neuroscience, Radboud University Medical Center
| | - Hans Knoop
- Expert Center for Chronic Fatigue, Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, VU University Medical Center
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Buffart LM, Sweegers MG, May AM, Chinapaw MJ, van Vulpen JK, Newton RU, Galvão DA, Aaronson NK, Stuiver MM, Jacobsen PB, Verdonck-de Leeuw IM, Steindorf K, Irwin ML, Hayes S, Griffith KA, Lucia A, Herrero-Roman F, Mesters I, van Weert E, Knoop H, Goedendorp MM, Mutrie N, Daley AJ, McConnachie A, Bohus M, Thorsen L, Schulz KH, Short CE, James EL, Plotnikoff RC, Arbane G, Schmidt ME, Potthoff K, van Beurden M, Oldenburg HS, Sonke GS, van Harten WH, Garrod R, Schmitz KH, Winters-Stone KM, Velthuis MJ, Taaffe DR, van Mechelen W, José Kersten M, Nollet F, Wenzel J, Wiskemann J, Brug J, Courneya KS. Targeting Exercise Interventions to Patients With Cancer in Need: An Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst 2018; 110:1190-1200. [PMID: 30299508 PMCID: PMC6454466 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djy161] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2018] [Revised: 07/23/2018] [Accepted: 08/14/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Exercise effects in cancer patients often appear modest, possibly because interventions rarely target patients most in need. This study investigated the moderator effects of baseline values on the exercise outcomes of fatigue, aerobic fitness, muscle strength, quality of life (QoL), and self-reported physical function (PF) in cancer patients during and post-treatment. Methods Individual patient data from 34 randomized exercise trials (n = 4519) were pooled. Linear mixed-effect models were used to study moderator effects of baseline values on exercise intervention outcomes and to determine whether these moderator effects differed by intervention timing (during vs post-treatment). All statistical tests were two-sided. Results Moderator effects of baseline fatigue and PF were consistent across intervention timing, with greater effects in patients with worse fatigue (Pinteraction = .05) and worse PF (Pinteraction = .003). Moderator effects of baseline aerobic fitness, muscle strength, and QoL differed by intervention timing. During treatment, effects on aerobic fitness were greater for patients with better baseline aerobic fitness (Pinteraction = .002). Post-treatment, effects on upper (Pinteraction < .001) and lower (Pinteraction = .01) body muscle strength and QoL (Pinteraction < .001) were greater in patients with worse baseline values. Conclusion Although exercise should be encouraged for most cancer patients during and post-treatments, targeting specific subgroups may be especially beneficial and cost effective. For fatigue and PF, interventions during and post-treatment should target patients with high fatigue and low PF. During treatment, patients experience benefit for muscle strength and QoL regardless of baseline values; however, only patients with low baseline values benefit post-treatment. For aerobic fitness, patients with low baseline values do not appear to benefit from exercise during treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laurien M Buffart
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Maike G Sweegers
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Anne M May
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, University of Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Mai J Chinapaw
- Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jonna K van Vulpen
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, University of Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Rob U Newton
- Exercise Medicine Research Institute, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA, Australia
| | - Daniel A Galvão
- Exercise Medicine Research Institute, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA, Australia
| | | | - Martijn M Stuiver
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology (NKA) and Center for Quality of life, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Paul B Jacobsen
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Science, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Irma M Verdonck-de Leeuw
- Department of Clinical Psychology, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute and Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Karen Steindorf
- Division of Physical Activity, Prevention and Cancer, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Sandi Hayes
- School of Public Health and Social Work, Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, QLD, Australia
| | | | | | | | - Ilse Mesters
- Department of Epidemiology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Ellen van Weert
- University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Center for Rehabilitation, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Hans Knoop
- Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Martine M Goedendorp
- Department of Health Psychology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
- Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Nanette Mutrie
- Physical Activity for Health Research Center, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Amanda J Daley
- School of Sports, Exercise and Health Sciences, University of Loughborough, Loughborough, UK
| | - Alex McConnachie
- Robertson Centre for Biostatistics, Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Martin Bohus
- Institute of Psychiatric and Psychosomatic Psychotherapy, Central Institute of Mental Health, Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
- Faculty of Health, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Lene Thorsen
- National Advisory Unit on Late Effects after Cancer Treatment, Department of Oncology (LT) and Department of Clinical Service (LT), Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Karl-Heinz Schulz
- Athleticum – Competence Center for Sports- and Exercise Medicine and Institute for Medical Psychology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Camille E Short
- Freemasons Foundation Centre of Men’s Health, School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | | | - Ronald C Plotnikoff
- School of Medicine & Public Health (ELJ) and Priority Research Centre for Physical Activity and Nutrition (RCP), The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
| | - Gill Arbane
- Lane Fox Respiratory Research Unit, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Martina E Schmidt
- Division of Physical Activity, Prevention and Cancer, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Karin Potthoff
- Department of Medical Oncology (KP, JmW) and Department of Radiation Oncology (KP), National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) and Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Marc van Beurden
- Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Hester S Oldenburg
- Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Gabe S Sonke
- Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Wim H van Harten
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology (NKA) and Center for Quality of life, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands
| | - Rachel Garrod
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Kings College London, London, UK
| | - Kathryn H Schmitz
- Department of Public Health Science, College of Medicine and Cancer Institute, Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, PA
| | - Kerri M Winters-Stone
- Knight Cancer Institute and School of Nursing, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR
| | - Miranda J Velthuis
- Department of Medical Oncology (KP, JmW) and Department of Radiation Oncology (KP), National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) and Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Public Health Science, College of Medicine and Cancer Institute, Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, PA
- Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Dennis R Taaffe
- Exercise Medicine Research Institute, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA, Australia
| | - Willem van Mechelen
- Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marie José Kersten
- Department of Hematology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Frans Nollet
- Department of Rehabilitation, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences Research Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jennifer Wenzel
- Johns Hopkins School of Nursing, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD
| | | | - Johannes Brug
- Amsterdam School of Communication Research (ASCoR), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Kerry S Courneya
- Faculty of Kinesiology, Sport, and Recreation, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Kalter J, Verdonck-de Leeuw IM, Sweegers MG, Aaronson NK, Jacobsen PB, Newton RU, Courneya KS, Aitken JF, Armes J, Arving C, Boersma LJ, Braamse AMJ, Brandberg Y, Chambers SK, Dekker J, Ell K, Ferguson RJ, Gielissen MFM, Glimelius B, Goedendorp MM, Graves KD, Heiney SP, Horne R, Hunter MS, Johansson B, Kimman ML, Knoop H, Meneses K, Northouse LL, Oldenburg HS, Prins JB, Savard J, van Beurden M, van den Berg SW, Brug J, Buffart LM. Effects and moderators of psychosocial interventions on quality of life, and emotional and social function in patients with cancer: An individual patient data meta-analysis of 22 RCTs. Psychooncology 2018; 27:1150-1161. [PMID: 29361206 PMCID: PMC5947559 DOI: 10.1002/pon.4648] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2017] [Revised: 01/02/2018] [Accepted: 01/10/2018] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Objective This individual patient data (IPD) meta‐analysis aimed to evaluate the effects of psychosocial interventions (PSI) on quality of life (QoL), emotional function (EF), and social function (SF) in patients with cancer, and to study moderator effects of demographic, clinical, personal, and intervention‐related characteristics. Methods Relevant studies were identified via literature searches in 4 databases. We pooled IPD from 22 (n = 4217) of 61 eligible randomized controlled trials. Linear mixed‐effect model analyses were used to study intervention effects on the post‐intervention values of QoL, EF, and SF (z‐scores), adjusting for baseline values, age, and cancer type. We studied moderator effects by testing interactions with the intervention for demographic, clinical, personal, and intervention‐related characteristics, and conducted subsequent stratified analyses for significant moderator variables.Results: PSI significantly improved QoL (β = 0.14,95%CI = 0.06;0.21), EF (β = 0.13,95%CI = 0.05;0.20), and SF (β = 0.10,95%CI = 0.03;0.18). Significant differences in effects of different types of PSI were found, with largest effects of psychotherapy. The effects of coping skills training were moderated by age, treatment type, and targeted interventions. Effects of psychotherapy on EF may be moderated by cancer type, but these analyses were based on 2 randomized controlled trials with small sample sizes of some cancer types. Conclusions PSI significantly improved QoL, EF, and SF, with small overall effects. However, the effects differed by several demographic, clinical, personal, and intervention‐related characteristics. Our study highlights the beneficial effects of coping skills training in patients treated with chemotherapy, the importance of targeted interventions, and the need of developing interventions tailored to the specific needs of elderly patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Kalter
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - I M Verdonck-de Leeuw
- Department of Clinical Psychology, VU University Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Amsterdam Public Health research institute and Cancer Center Amsterdam, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M G Sweegers
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - N K Aaronson
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - P B Jacobsen
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Science, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, FL, USA
| | - R U Newton
- Exercise Medicine Research Institute, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA, Australia
| | - K S Courneya
- Faculty of Kinesiology, Sport, and Recreation, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - J F Aitken
- Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Southport, Australia.,Cancer Council Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.,Institute for Resilient Regions, University of Southern Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - J Armes
- Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
| | - C Arving
- Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - L J Boersma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Center (MAASTRO clinic), Maastricht, The Netherlands.,GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - A M J Braamse
- Department of Medical Psychology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Y Brandberg
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - S K Chambers
- Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Southport, Australia.,Cancer Council Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.,Prostate Cancer Foundation of Australia, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - J Dekker
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Psychiatry, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - K Ell
- Department of Adults and Healthy Aging, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - R J Ferguson
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - M F M Gielissen
- Department of Medical Psychology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - B Glimelius
- Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - M M Goedendorp
- Department of Health Psychology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - K D Graves
- Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - S P Heiney
- College of Nursing, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA
| | - R Horne
- UCL School of Pharmacy, University College London, London, UK
| | - M S Hunter
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - B Johansson
- Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - M L Kimman
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - H Knoop
- Department of Medical Psychology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - K Meneses
- University of Alabama at Birmingham, School of Nursing, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - L L Northouse
- University of Michigan School of Nursing, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - H S Oldenburg
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J B Prins
- Department of Medical Psychology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - J Savard
- School of Psychology, Université Laval and Laval University Cancer Research Center, Québec, QC, Canada
| | - M van Beurden
- Department of Gynecology, Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - S W van den Berg
- Department of Medical Psychology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - J Brug
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Amsterdam School of Communication Research (ASCoR), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - L M Buffart
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Exercise Medicine Research Institute, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA, Australia.,Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Goedendorp MM, Steverink N. Interventions based on self-management of well-being theory: pooling data to demonstrate mediation and ceiling effects, and to compare formats. Aging Ment Health 2017; 21:947-953. [PMID: 27171347 DOI: 10.1080/13607863.2016.1182967] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Interventions based on self-management of well-being (SMW) theory have shown positive effects, but additional questions remain: (1) Are improvements in well-being, as induced by the interventions, mediated by improved self-management ability (SMA)? (2) Do the interventions show ceiling effects? (3) Is a particular format of SMW intervention (individual, group, or self-help) more effective? METHOD Data of three randomized controlled trials were pooled. The greater part of the sample (N = 445) consisted of single older females. A bootstrap analysis was performed to test for mediation. Regression analyses with interaction effects were performed to test for ceiling effects. Controlled and transformed effect sizes (proportion of maximum change) were calculated to compare formats. RESULTS There was a full significant mediation of well-being by SMA. A significant interaction (ceiling) effect was found on well-being, but not on SMA. The controlled effect sizes of the raw scores were small to medium (.04-.49), and were small to large after transformation (.41-.73). None of the intervention formats was more effective. CONCLUSION Support for SMW theory was found, i.e. increasing self-management ability lead to improved well-being. Some ceiling effect was found. We conclude that various SMW interventions formats can improve self-management abilities and well-being with medium effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M M Goedendorp
- a Department of Health Psychology , University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen , Groningen , The Netherlands
| | - N Steverink
- a Department of Health Psychology , University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen , Groningen , The Netherlands.,b Department of Sociology , University of Groningen , Groningen , The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Abrahams HJG, Gielissen MFM, Donders RRT, Goedendorp MM, van der Wouw AJ, Verhagen CAHHVM, Knoop H. The efficacy of Internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy for severely fatigued survivors of breast cancer compared with care as usual: A randomized controlled trial. Cancer 2017. [PMID: 28621820 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.30815] [Citation(s) in RCA: 87] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Severe fatigue is a common and distressing symptom affecting approximately one in four survivors of breast cancer. The current study examined the efficacy of Internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy (ICBT) for severe fatigue in survivors of breast cancer compared with care as usual (CAU). METHODS The authors conducted a parallel-group randomized controlled trial. Severely fatigued, disease-free survivors of breast cancer who had completed cancer treatment at least 3 months previously were eligible. Participants were randomly allocated to ICBT or CAU using computer-generated stratified block randomization. The primary outcome of fatigue severity was assessed at baseline and after 6 months, as were the secondary outcomes of functional impairment, psychological distress, and quality of life. Statistical effects were tested with analyses of covariance (intention-to-treat analysis). RESULTS Participants were recruited between January 2014 and March 2016 and assigned to ICBT (66 patients) or CAU (66 patients). Compared with the participants who had received CAU, those who had received ICBT reported lower fatigue scores at 6 months (mean difference [Δ], 11.5; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 7.7-15.3) and a large effect size (Cohen d = 1.0), with the majority of patients (73%) demonstrating clinically significant improvement. ICBT also was found to lead to lower functional impairment (Δ, 297.8; 95% CI, 145.5-450.1) and psychological distress scores (Δ, 5.7; 95% CI, 3.4-7.9) and higher quality-of-life scores (Δ, 11.7; 95% CI, 5.8-17.7) compared with CAU, with medium to large effect sizes (Cohen d = 0.6-0.8). CONCLUSIONS ICBT appears to be effective in reducing severe fatigue and related symptoms and meets the current need for easy accessible and more efficient evidence-based treatment options for severely fatigued survivors of breast cancer. Cancer 2017;123:3825-34. © 2017 American Cancer Society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harriët J G Abrahams
- Expert Center for Chronic Fatigue, Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Medical Psychology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Marieke F M Gielissen
- Department of Medical Psychology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rogier R T Donders
- Department for Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Martine M Goedendorp
- Department of Health Psychology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Hans Knoop
- Expert Center for Chronic Fatigue, Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Medical Psychology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Menting J, Tack CJ, van Bon AC, Jansen HJ, van den Bergh JP, Mol MJTM, Goedendorp MM, Donders R, Knoop H. Web-based cognitive behavioural therapy blended with face-to-face sessions for chronic fatigue in type 1 diabetes: a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2017; 5:448-456. [PMID: 28462869 DOI: 10.1016/s2213-8587(17)30098-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2017] [Revised: 02/16/2017] [Accepted: 02/20/2017] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Fatigue in type 1 diabetes is prevalent and persistent, but so far, no evidence-based treatments are available. We aimed to investigate the efficacy of cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) in reducing fatigue severity in patients with type 1 diabetes. METHODS We did a multicentre randomised controlled trial at one university medical centre and four large teaching hospitals in the Netherlands. Eligible patients were aged 18-70 years and had type 1 diabetes for at least 1 year and chronic fatigue for at least 6 months. We randomly assigned patients (1:1) to CBT or waiting list using computer-generated blocked randomisation, stratified by type of enrolment. The CBT intervention (Dia-Fit) was given for 5 months in blended form, consisting of face-to-face and web-based sessions. The primary outcome was fatigue severity assessed 5 months after randomisation, directly after the intervention or waiting list period, with the Checklist Individual Strength fatigue severity subscale. Secondary outcomes were functional impairment (assessed with the total score of the Sickness Impact Profile-8), glycaemic control (HbA1c), and glucose variability. Analyses were done by intention to treat. This trial is registered with the Nederlands Trial Register, number NTR4312. FINDINGS Between Feb 6, 2014, and March 24, 2016, we randomly assigned 120 eligible patients to either CBT (n=60) or waiting list (n=60), all of whom were included in the intention-to-treat analyses. Compared with patients in the waiting list group, those in the CBT group had significantly lower fatigue severity scores (mean difference 13·8, 95% CI 10·0-17·5; p<0·0001) and significantly lower scores for functional impairment (mean difference 513, 95% CI 340-686; p<0·0001) after 5 months. HbA1c and glucose variability did not change after treatment and there was no difference between groups. Five patients in the CBT group and seven in the waiting list group reported adverse events; none were deemed to be related to the study intervention. INTERPRETATION Although our findings need to be confirmed in larger and longer-term studies, they suggest that CBT can effectively reduce fatigue severity and functional impairment in type 1 diabetes. FUNDING Dutch Diabetes Research Foundation (Diabetes Fonds).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juliane Menting
- Expert Centre for Chronic Fatigue, Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Department of Medical Psychology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Cees J Tack
- Department of Internal Medicine, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Arianne C van Bon
- Department of Internal Medicine, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, Netherlands
| | - Henry J Jansen
- Department of Internal Medicine, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's-Hertogenbosch, Netherlands
| | - Joop P van den Bergh
- Department of Internal Medicine, VieCuri Medical Centre, Venlo, Netherlands; Department of Internal Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Marc J T M Mol
- Department of Internal Medicine, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Martine M Goedendorp
- Department of Health Psychology, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Rogier Donders
- Department for Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Hans Knoop
- Expert Centre for Chronic Fatigue, Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Goedendorp MM, Kuiper D, Reijneveld SA, Sanderman R, Steverink N. Sustaining program effectiveness after implementation: The case of the self-management of well-being group intervention for older adults. Patient Educ Couns 2017; 100:1177-1184. [PMID: 28089311 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2017.01.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2016] [Revised: 01/05/2017] [Accepted: 01/09/2017] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The Self-Management of Well-being (SMW) group intervention for older women was implemented in health and social care. Our aim was to assess whether effects of the SMW intervention were comparable with the original randomized controlled trial (RCT). Furthermore, we investigated threats to effectiveness, such as participant adherence, group reached, and program fidelity. METHODS In the implementation study (IMP) 287 and RCT 142 women participated. We compared scores on self-management ability and well-being of the IMP and RCT. For adherence, drop-out rates and session attendance were compared. Regarding reach, we compared participants' baseline characteristics. Professionals completed questions regarding program fidelity. RESULTS No significant differences were found on effect outcomes and adherence between IMP and RCT (all p≥0.135). Intervention effect sizes were equal (0.47-0.59). IMP participants were significantly less lonely and more likely to be married, but had lower well-being. Most professionals followed the protocol, with only minimal deviations. CONCLUSION The effectiveness of the SMW group intervention was reproduced after implementation, with similar participant adherence, minimal changes in the group reached, and high program fidelity. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS The SMW group intervention can be transferred to health and social care without loss of effectiveness. Implementation at a larger scale is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martine M Goedendorp
- Department of Health Psychology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
| | - Daphne Kuiper
- Department of Health Psychology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands; Clinical Research Office, UMC staff, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Sijmen A Reijneveld
- Department of Health Sciences, (Community & Occupational Medicine,) University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Robbert Sanderman
- Department of Health Psychology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands; Department of Psychology, Health & Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Nardi Steverink
- Department of Health Psychology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands; Department of Sociology, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Menting J, Nikolaus S, van der Veld WM, Goedendorp MM, Tack CJ, Knoop H. Corrigendum to "Severe fatigue in type 1 diabetes: Exploring its course, predictors and relationship with HbA 1c in a prospective study" [Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 121 (2016) 127-134]. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2017; 126:325. [PMID: 28256277 DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2017.02.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Juliane Menting
- Expert Center for Chronic Fatigue, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - Stephanie Nikolaus
- Expert Center for Chronic Fatigue, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Martine M Goedendorp
- Department of Health Psychology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Cees J Tack
- Department of Internal Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Hans Knoop
- Expert Center for Chronic Fatigue, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Department of Medical Psychology, Academic Medical Centre (AMC), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Poort H, Verhagen CAHHVM, Peters MEWJ, Goedendorp MM, Donders ART, Hopman MTE, Nijhuis-van der Sanden MWG, Berends T, Bleijenberg G, Knoop H. Study protocol of the TIRED study: a randomised controlled trial comparing either graded exercise therapy for severe fatigue or cognitive behaviour therapy with usual care in patients with incurable cancer. BMC Cancer 2017; 17:81. [PMID: 28129746 PMCID: PMC5273841 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-017-3076-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2016] [Accepted: 01/19/2017] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Fatigue is a common and debilitating symptom for patients with incurable cancer receiving systemic treatment with palliative intent. There is evidence that non-pharmacological interventions such as graded exercise therapy (GET) or cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) reduce cancer-related fatigue in disease-free cancer patients and in patients receiving treatment with curative intent. These interventions may also result in a reduction of fatigue in patients receiving treatment with palliative intent, by improving physical fitness (GET) or changing fatigue-related cognitions and behaviour (CBT). The primary aim of our study is to assess the efficacy of GET or CBT compared to usual care (UC) in reducing fatigue in patients with incurable cancer. METHODS The TIRED study is a multicentre three-armed randomised controlled trial (RCT) for incurable cancer patients receiving systemic treatment with palliative intent. Participants will be randomised to GET, CBT, or UC. In addition to UC, the GET group will participate in a 12-week supervised exercise programme. The CBT group will receive a 12-week CBT intervention in addition to UC. Primary and secondary outcome measures will be assessed at baseline, post-intervention (14 weeks), and at follow-up assessments (18 and 26 weeks post-randomisation). The primary outcome measure is fatigue severity (Checklist Individual Strength subscale fatigue severity). Secondary outcome measures are fatigue (EORTC-QLQ-C30 subscale fatigue), functional impairments (Sickness Impact Profile total score, EORTC-QLQ-C30 subscale emotional functioning, subscale physical functioning) and quality of life (EORTC-QLQ-C30 subscale QoL). Outcomes at 14 weeks (primary endpoint) of either treatment arm will be compared to those of UC participants. In addition, outcomes at 18 and 26 weeks (follow-up assessments) of either treatment arm will be compared to those of UC participants. DISCUSSION To our knowledge, the TIRED study is the first RCT investigating the efficacy of GET and CBT on reducing fatigue during treatment with palliative intent in incurable cancer patients. The results of this study will provide information about the possibility and efficacy of GET and CBT for severely fatigued incurable cancer patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION NTR3812 ; date of registration: 23/01/2013.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hanneke Poort
- Expert Center for Chronic Fatigue, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | | | - Marlies E W J Peters
- Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Martine M Goedendorp
- Department of Health Psychology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - A Rogier T Donders
- Department of Health Evidence, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Maria T E Hopman
- Department of Physiology, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Thea Berends
- Expert Center for Chronic Fatigue, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Gijs Bleijenberg
- Expert Center for Chronic Fatigue, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Hans Knoop
- Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Academic Medical Centre (AMC), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Expert Center for Chronic Fatigue, Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Menting J, Nikolaus S, van der Veld WM, Goedendorp MM, Tack CJ, Knoop H. Severe fatigue in type 1 diabetes: Exploring its course, predictors and relationship with HbA 1c in a prospective study. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2016; 121:127-134. [PMID: 27710819 DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2016.09.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2016] [Revised: 08/24/2016] [Accepted: 09/06/2016] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
AIMS To prospectively identify the course of severe fatigue, its predictors and the relationship with HbA1c in patients with type 1 diabetes. METHODS 214 adult patients completed questionnaires on fatigue severity and fatigue-related factors at baseline. HbA1c was retrieved from medical records. After 43months, fatigue severity and HbA1c were reassessed in 194 patients. A logistic regression analysis was used to determine predictors of severe fatigue at follow-up with various cognitive-behavioral and clinical factors as potential predictors. The relationship between fatigue and HbA1c was investigated in a sub-analysis by differentiating between patients with suboptimal glucose control [HbA1c>7% (53mmol/mol)] and optimal glucose control [HbA1c⩽7% (53mmol/mol)]. RESULTS The prevalence of severe fatigue was 40% at baseline and 42% at follow-up. In three out of four severely fatigued patients at baseline (76%), severe fatigue persisted over time. More depressive symptoms, more pain, sleep disturbances, lower self-efficacy concerning fatigue, less confidence in diabetes self-care, more fatigue severity at baseline and more diabetes complications predicted severe fatigue at follow-up. Over time, HbA1c at baseline was positively associated with fatigue severity at follow-up in both groups (suboptimal glucose control: r=.18, p<.05; optimal glucose control: r=.09, p<.05). CONCLUSIONS About three quarters of fatigued[corrected] patients with type 1 diabetes suffer from persistent fatigue. Aside from the number of diabetes complications, no clinical factors explained the persistence of fatigue. HbA1c and fatigue were weakly associated in a sub-analysis. Since the strongest predictors of severe fatigue were cognitive-behavioral factors, behavioral interventions might be effective in decreasing fatigue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juliane Menting
- Expert Center for Chronic Fatigue, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - Stephanie Nikolaus
- Expert Center for Chronic Fatigue, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Martine M Goedendorp
- Department of Health Psychology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Cees J Tack
- Department of Internal Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Hans Knoop
- Expert Center for Chronic Fatigue, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Department of Medical Psychology, Academic Medical Centre (AMC), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Abrahams HJG, Gielissen MFM, Goedendorp MM, Berends T, Peters MEWJ, Poort H, Verhagen CAHHVM, Knoop H. A randomized controlled trial of web-based cognitive behavioral therapy for severely fatigued breast cancer survivors (CHANGE-study): study protocol. BMC Cancer 2015; 15:765. [PMID: 26500019 PMCID: PMC4619089 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-015-1787-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2015] [Accepted: 10/13/2015] [Indexed: 01/30/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND About one third of breast cancer survivors suffer from persistent severe fatigue after completion of curative cancer treatment. Face-to-face cognitive behavioral therapy (F2F CBT), especially designed for fatigue in cancer survivors, was found effective in reducing fatigue. However, this intervention is intensive and treatment capacity is limited. To extend treatment options, a web-based version of CBT requiring less therapist time was developed. This intervention is aimed at changing fatigue-perpetuating cognitions and behaviors. The efficacy of web-based CBT will be examined in a multicenter randomized controlled trial. METHODS In total, 132 severely fatigued breast cancer survivors will be recruited and randomized to either an intervention condition or care as usual (ratio 1:1). Participants will be assessed at baseline and 6 months thereafter. The intervention group will receive web-based CBT, consisting of three F2F sessions and maximally eight web-based modules over a period of 6 months. The care as usual group will be on a waiting list for regular F2F CBT. The total duration of the waiting list is 6 months. The primary outcome of the study is fatigue severity. Secondary outcomes are functional impairments, psychological distress and quality of life. DISCUSSION If web-based CBT is effective, it will provide an additional treatment option for fatigue in breast cancer survivors. Web-based CBT is expected to be less time-consuming for therapists than regular F2F CBT, which would result in an increased treatment capacity. Moreover, the intervention would become more easily accessible for a larger number of patients, and patients can save travel time and costs. TRIAL REGISTRATION Dutch Trial Registry--NTR4309.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H J G Abrahams
- Expert Center for Chronic Fatigue (ECCF), Radboud University Medical Center, PO Box 9101, 916, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - M F M Gielissen
- Expert Center for Chronic Fatigue (ECCF), Radboud University Medical Center, PO Box 9101, 916, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - M M Goedendorp
- Department of Health Sciences, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
| | - T Berends
- Expert Center for Chronic Fatigue (ECCF), Radboud University Medical Center, PO Box 9101, 916, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - M E W J Peters
- Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - H Poort
- Expert Center for Chronic Fatigue (ECCF), Radboud University Medical Center, PO Box 9101, 916, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - C A H H V M Verhagen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - H Knoop
- Expert Center for Chronic Fatigue (ECCF), Radboud University Medical Center, PO Box 9101, 916, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Goedendorp MM, Jacobsen PB, Andrykowski MA. Fatigue screening in breast cancer patients: identifying likely cases of cancer-related fatigue. Psychooncology 2015. [PMID: 26202003 DOI: 10.1002/pon.3907] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE For clinical and research purposes, efficient identification of cases of cancer-related fatigue (CRF) is important, as CRF can be persistent and interfere with usual functioning. While various fatigue-screening instruments are available, no brief screening indices have been developed using formally diagnosed CRF cases as the criterion. METHODS Breast cancer patients (n = 385) completed a fatigue diagnostic interview and self-report fatigue measures (Profile of Mood States-fatigue subscale, Fatigue Symptom Inventory, and SF-36 vitality subscale), after initial adjuvant therapy (post-treatment (post-Tx) 1 assessment), after completion of radiotherapy for women receiving chemotherapy + radiotherapy (post-Tx 2 assessment), and 6 months after completion of all adjuvant therapy (6-month post-Tx assessment). CRF cases were identified using specific diagnostic criteria. ROC analyses identified screening indices, which could accurately identify CRF cases after initial adjuvant therapy. Screening indices were cross-validated using post-Tx 2 and 6-month follow-up assessment data. RESULTS A total of 104 women (27%) met CRF criteria after initial adjuvant therapy. Six two-item screening indices were identified. For all indices, area under the curve exceeded 0.80, sensitivity exceeded 0.80, and specificity exceeded 0.57. Cross-validation suggested that, except for the index based on SF-36, all the indices continued to accurately identify CRF cases at the post-Tx 2 and 6-month post-Tx assessments. Overall, a two-item composite index based on Fatigue Symptom Inventory 'most severity' and 'work interference' items performed best. CONCLUSIONS Breast cancer patients and survivors meeting CRF diagnostic criteria can be accurately identified using brief screening indices derived from common self-report fatigue measures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martine M Goedendorp
- Department of Health Psychology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Paul B Jacobsen
- Health Outcomes and Behavior Program, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Michael A Andrykowski
- Department of Behavioral Science, College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Kuiper D, Goedendorp MM, Sanderman R, Reijneveld SA, Steverink N. Identifying the determinants of use of the G&G interventions for older adults in health and social care: protocol of a multilevel approach. BMC Res Notes 2015; 8:296. [PMID: 26148775 PMCID: PMC4493806 DOI: 10.1186/s13104-015-1262-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2013] [Accepted: 06/30/2015] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Despite aging-related losses, many older adults are able to maintain high levels of subjective well-being. However, not all older adults are able to self-manage and adapt. The GRIP&GLEAM [Dutch: GRIP&GLANS] (G&G) interventions have shown to significantly improve self-management ability, well-being and loneliness in older adults. Actual use of the evidence-based G&G interventions, however, remains limited as long as the interplay between implementation factors at different hierarchical stakeholder levels is poorly understood. The aim of the study is to identify the determinants of successful implementation of the G&G interventions. Methods/design The study is performed in health and social care organizations in the northern part of the Netherlands. The degree of implementation success is operationalized by four parameters: use (yes/no), pace (time to initial use), performance (extent of use) and prolongation (intention to continue use). Based on the Fleuren model, factors at four hierarchical stakeholder levels (i.e. target group, professionals, organizations and financial-political context) are assessed at three measurement points in 2 years. The nested data are analyzed applying multilevel modeling techniques. Discussion In this study, health and social care organizations are considered to be part of multilevel functional systems, in which factors at different hierarchical stakeholder levels impede or facilitate use of the G&G interventions. Strengths of the study are the multifaceted measurement of use, and the multilevel approach in identifying the determinants. The study will contribute to the development of ecologically valid implementation strategies of the G&G interventions and comparable evidence-based practices. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13104-015-1262-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daphne Kuiper
- Department of Health Sciences, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
| | - Martine M Goedendorp
- Department of Health Sciences, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
| | - Robbert Sanderman
- Department of Health Sciences, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands. .,Department of Psychology, Health and Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
| | - Sijmen A Reijneveld
- Department of Health Sciences, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
| | - Nardi Steverink
- Department of Health Sciences, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands. .,Faculty of Behavioural and Social Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Peters MEWJ, Goedendorp MM, Verhagen SAHHVM, Smilde TJ, Bleijenberg G, van der Graaf WTA. A prospective analysis on fatigue and experienced burden in informal caregivers of cancer patients during cancer treatment in the palliative phase. Acta Oncol 2015; 54:500-6. [PMID: 25291079 DOI: 10.3109/0284186x.2014.953254] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although fatigue is the most frequently occurring symptom in patients with cancer, hardly anything is known about fatigue of their informal caregivers and the impact fatigue might have on perceived burden with providing care. We investigated the presence of fatigue in caregivers, its course and the relation of fatigue severity between caregivers and patients. Furthermore, we explored in caregivers whether fatigue severity was correlated to experienced burden. MATERIAL AND METHODS Informal caregivers and patients on cancer treatment in the palliative phase completed questionnaires at baseline and follow-up (6 months later). To measure fatigue severity, both groups completed the Checklist Individual Strength. Additionally, caregivers completed the Caregivers Strain Index to assess experienced burden with providing care. Descriptive analyses, paired t-tests, χ(2)-tests, Pearson's correlations and regression analysis were performed. RESULTS At baseline 111 couples (patients and caregivers) participated, at follow-up 75 couples. At both time points 23% of caregivers were severely fatigued. There was no significant correlation between patients and caregivers on fatigue. Higher fatigue in both patients and caregivers was correlated with higher burden in caregivers and over 30% of burden could be explained by fatigue. CONCLUSION Almost a quarter of caregivers of patients on active palliative treatment were severely fatigued, which figure remained stable over time. Fatigue in both patients and caregivers was related to caregivers' burden. This observation should be taken into account with the growing demand on caregivers and the increase in cancer treatment options in the palliative setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marlies E W J Peters
- Radboud university medical center, Department of Medical Oncology (452) , Nijmegen , The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Goedendorp MM, Bleijenberg G, Knoop H. Response to 'Underperformance of myalgic encephalomyelitis (ME)/chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) patients at neurocognitive tests should be assessed objectively'. J Psychosom Res 2014; 76:340. [PMID: 24630188 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2013.12.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2013] [Accepted: 12/12/2013] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- M M Goedendorp
- Department of Health Sciences, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen; Expert Centre for Chronic Fatigue, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre
| | - G Bleijenberg
- Expert Centre for Chronic Fatigue, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre
| | - H Knoop
- Expert Centre for Chronic Fatigue, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Peters MEWJ, Goedendorp MM, Verhagen SAHHVM, van der Graaf WTA, Bleijenberg G. Exploring the contribution of psychosocial factors to fatigue in patients with advanced incurable cancer. Psychooncology 2014; 23:773-9. [DOI: 10.1002/pon.3481] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2013] [Revised: 12/16/2013] [Accepted: 12/17/2013] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Marlies E. W. J. Peters
- Department of Medical Oncology; Radboud University, Medical Center; Nijmegen The Netherlands
| | - Martine M. Goedendorp
- Expert Center Chronic Fatigue; Radboud University Medical Center; Nijmegen The Netherlands
- Department of Health Sciences; University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen; Groningen The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Gijs Bleijenberg
- Expert Center Chronic Fatigue; Radboud University Medical Center; Nijmegen The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Goedendorp MM, Tack CJ, Steggink E, Bloot L, Bazelmans E, Knoop H. Chronic fatigue in type 1 diabetes: highly prevalent but not explained by hyperglycemia or glucose variability. Diabetes Care 2014; 37:73-80. [PMID: 23949561 DOI: 10.2337/dc13-0515] [Citation(s) in RCA: 67] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Fatigue is a classical symptom of hyperglycemia, but the relationship between chronic fatigue and diabetes has not been systematically studied. We investigated prevalence, impact, and potential determinants of chronic fatigue in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Out of 324 randomly selected T1DM outpatients, 214 participated in this cross-sectional observational study. Participants were compared with age- and sex-matched population-based controls. Chronic fatigue, functional impairments, current health status, comorbidity, diabetes-related factors, and fatigue-related cognitions and behaviors were assessed with questionnaires, and HbA1c values and comorbidity were assessed with medical records. Sixty-six patients underwent continuous glucose monitoring combined with an electronic fatigue diary for 5 days. Acute fatigue and four glucose parameters were determined: mean, variability, and relative time spent in hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia. RESULTS T1DM patients were significantly more often chronically fatigued (40%; 95% CI 34-47%) compared with matched controls (7%; 95% CI 3-10%; P < 0.001). Chronically fatigued patients had significantly more functional impairments. Fatigue was the most troublesome symptom. Age, depression, pain, sleeping problems, low self-efficacy concerning fatigue, and physical inactivity were significantly associated with chronic fatigue. Chronically fatigued patients spent slightly less time in hypoglycemia (proportion 0.07 ± 0.06 vs. 0.12 ± 0.10; P = 0.025). Glucose parameters were not related to acute fatigue. CONCLUSIONS Chronic fatigue is highly prevalent and clinically relevant in T1DM. Its significant relationship with cognitive behavioral variables and weak association with blood glucose levels suggests that behavioral interventions could be helpful in managing chronic fatigue in T1DM.
Collapse
|
26
|
Goedendorp MM, Knoop H, Gielissen MFM, Verhagen CAHHVM, Bleijenberg G. The effects of cognitive behavioral therapy for postcancer fatigue on perceived cognitive disabilities and neuropsychological test performance. J Pain Symptom Manage 2014; 47:35-44. [PMID: 23707383 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2013.02.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2012] [Revised: 02/20/2013] [Accepted: 02/22/2013] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT After successful cancer treatment, a substantial number of survivors continue to experience fatigue and related concentration and memory problems. Severe fatigue after cancer treatment can be treated effectively with cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), but it is unclear whether CBT has an effect on cognitive functioning. OBJECTIVES We hypothesized that patients would report less cognitive disability after treatment with CBT for cancer-related fatigue. CBT was not expected to affect neuropsychological test performance, as it has been shown that fatigue is not associated with test performance. METHODS Data were used from a randomized controlled trial in which 98 severely fatigued cancer survivors, treated at least one year previously, were assessed at baseline (T1) and six months post-baseline (T2). Patients were randomly assigned to receive CBT (n = 50) or to a waiting list (WL) control condition (n = 48). Self-reported cognitive disability was assessed by the Concentration subscale of the Checklist Individual Strength and the Alertness Behavior subscale of the Sickness Impact Profile. Neuropsychological test performance was measured by the symbol digit modalities task and two reaction time tasks. RESULTS Patients who received CBT for post-cancer fatigue reported significantly less cognitive disability compared with those in the WL group. CBT also was associated with a clinically relevant reduction in concentration problems (CBT, 32% vs. WL, 2%). There were no significant differences in neuropsychological test performance between the CBT and WL groups. CONCLUSION CBT for post-cancer fatigue has already been shown to be an effective therapy. The present study demonstrates that CBT also may lead to a decrease in perceived cognitive disability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martine M Goedendorp
- Department of Health Sciences, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands; Expert Centre for Chronic Fatigue, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - Hans Knoop
- Expert Centre for Chronic Fatigue, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Marieke F M Gielissen
- Department of Medical Psychology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Gijs Bleijenberg
- Expert Centre for Chronic Fatigue, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Goedendorp MM, van der Werf SP, Bleijenberg G, Tummers M, Knoop H. Does neuropsychological test performance predict outcome of cognitive behavior therapy for Chronic Fatigue Syndrome and what is the role of underperformance? J Psychosom Res 2013; 75:242-8. [PMID: 23972413 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2013.07.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2013] [Revised: 07/16/2013] [Accepted: 07/17/2013] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE A subgroup of patients with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS) has cognitive impairments, reflected by deviant neuropsychological test performance. However, abnormal test scores can also be caused by suboptimal effort. We hypothesized that worse neuropsychological test performance and underperformance were related to each other and to a smaller reduction in fatigue, functional impairments, physical limitations and higher dropout rates following cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) for CFS. METHODS Data were drawn from a previous trial, in which CFS patients were randomized to two conditions; 1) guided self-instruction and additional CBT (n=84) or 2) waiting period followed by regular CBT for CFS (n=85). Underperformance was assessed using the Amsterdam Short Term Memory Test (<84). To test neuropsychological test performance, the Symbol Digit Modalities Task, a simple reaction time task and a choice reaction time task were used. Interaction effects were determined between underperformance and neuropsychological test performance on therapy outcomes. RESULTS Underperformance was associated to worse neuropsychological test performance, but there were no significant interaction effects of these two factors by therapy on fatigue severity, functional impairments and physical limitations, but there was a significant main effect of underperformance on functional impairments, physical limitations and dropout rates. CONCLUSION Underperformance or neuropsychological test performance was not related to the change in fatigue, functional impairments, and physical limitations following CBT for CFS. However, underperforming patients did drop out more often. Therapists should pay attention to beliefs and behavioral or environmental factors that might maintain underperformance and increase the risk of dropout.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martine M Goedendorp
- Department of Health Sciences, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, The Netherlands.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Goedendorp MM, Hoitsma AJ, Bloot L, Bleijenberg G, Knoop H. Severe fatigue after kidney transplantation: a highly prevalent, disabling and multifactorial symptom. Transpl Int 2013; 26:1007-15. [PMID: 23952141 DOI: 10.1111/tri.12166] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2013] [Revised: 04/20/2013] [Accepted: 07/21/2013] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Fatigue is a common symptom of patients with chronic kidney disease, but seldom investigated after transplantation. We determined the prevalence, impact and related factors of severe fatigue in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). Medical records and questionnaires were used to assess kidney function, donor characteristics, fatigue (Checklist Individual Strength), functional impairments (Sickness Impact Profile), work status, body mass index (BMI), pain, depressive symptoms, social support and sleeping problems in 180 participating KTRs. KTRs were compared with sex- and age-matched population-based controls. KTRs were significantly more often severely fatigued (39%) compared to matched controls (22%; P = 0.001). Severely fatigued KTRs had significantly more functional impairments than nonseverely fatigued recipients (effect size ≥ 0.7) P < 0.001, and less often a paid job (27% vs. 48%, P = 0.005). Univariate analysis showed that severely fatigued KTRs received more often a kidney from a deceased donor, had a higher BMI, more pain, discrepancy in social support, depressive symptoms and sleeping problems. In a multivariate analysis (n = 151) the latter two associations remained significant. Severe fatigue is a highly prevalent and disabling symptom in KTRs. Moreover, severe fatigue after kidney transplantation is more strongly related to behavioural and psychosocial factors than specific transplantation-related factors. Findings have implications for fatigue management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martine M Goedendorp
- Expert Centre for Chronic Fatigue, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Department of Health Sciences, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Goedendorp MM, Gielissen MFM, Verhagen CAHHVM, Bleijenberg G. Development of fatigue in cancer survivors: a prospective follow-up study from diagnosis into the year after treatment. J Pain Symptom Manage 2013; 45:213-22. [PMID: 22926087 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2012.02.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 73] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2011] [Revised: 02/02/2012] [Accepted: 02/14/2012] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT There is a lack of longitudinal studies investigating fatigue from before cancer treatment to long after successful cancer treatment. OBJECTIVES This prospective follow-up study aimed to determine the prevalence and predictors of persistent fatigue in cancer survivors in the first year after completion of cancer treatment. METHODS Sixty patients with various malignancies were assessed before (T1), shortly after curative cancer treatment (T2), and one year after T2 (T3). Fatigue was assessed monthly between T2 and T3. Fatigue severity was measured using the subscale of the Checklist Individual Strength. Questionnaires were used to measure impaired sleep and rest, physical activity, social support, fatigue catastrophizing, and somatic-related attributions regarding fatigue. Linear regression analyses were performed to identify predictors of persistent fatigue. RESULTS In total, 22% of survivors had severe persistent fatigue over the last six months in the first year after cancer treatment. Fatigue at T1, T2, and negative interactions predicted the severity of persistent fatigue. Analyses without fatigue showed that more negative interactions, impaired sleep and rest, fatigue catastrophizing, and lower self-reported physical activity at T2 were associated with the severity of persistent fatigue. CONCLUSION Twenty-two percent of the survivors had severe persistent fatigue in the year after cancer treatment. Fatigue and cognitive behavioral factors predicted persistent fatigue in the year after cancer treatment. Diagnosis or cancer treatment did not predict persistent fatigue. The implication is that cognitive behavioral therapy for postcancer fatigue, aimed at the fatigue-perpetuating factors, could be offered from two months after successful cancer treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martine M Goedendorp
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Goedendorp MM, Andrykowski MA, Donovan KA, Jim HS, Phillips KM, Small BJ, Laronga C, Jacobsen PB. Prolonged impact of chemotherapy on fatigue in breast cancer survivors: a longitudinal comparison with radiotherapy-treated breast cancer survivors and noncancer controls. Cancer 2011; 118:3833-41. [PMID: 22086766 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.26226] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2011] [Revised: 03/22/2011] [Accepted: 03/31/2011] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In this study, the authors examined the influence of prior treatment on the course of fatigue in breast cancer survivors. Patients who received chemotherapy were expected to have greater fatigue than patients who received radiotherapy and noncancer controls 6 months after the completion of treatment, but they were expected to recover to levels similar to those of the other 2 groups 3 years later. METHODS Patients with stage 0 through II breast cancer completed the Fatigue Symptom Inventory (FSI) and the Profile of Mood States Fatigue Scale (POMS-FAT) 6 months (T1) and 42 months (T2) after completing chemotherapy with or without radiotherapy (the CT group; n = 103) or radiotherapy only (the RT group; n = 102). An age-matched group of women with no history of cancer (the NC group; n = 193) was assessed over a similar interval. RESULTS A significant (P = .041) group × time effect for FSI severity scores revealed that fatigue worsened over time in the CT group but remained stable and lower in the RT and NC groups. There also were significant group effects for FSI days (P < .001) and POMS-FAT (P = .010) scores, indicating that fatigue was significantly greater across time in the CT group than in the NC group (POMS-FAT) or the RT and NC groups (FSI days). CONCLUSIONS Contrary to expectations, fatigue did not diminish over time in patients with breast cancer who received chemotherapy. This finding has important implications for patient education and for fatigue monitoring during follow-up. The authors concluded that future research should seek to examine possible mechanisms to explain the apparent prolonged impact of chemotherapy on fatigue in breast cancer survivors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martine M Goedendorp
- Expert Center for Chronic Fatigue, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Goedendorp MM, Gielissen MF, Peters ME, Verhagen CA, Bleijenberg G. Moderators and long-term effectiveness of cognitive behaviour therapy for fatigue during cancer treatment. Psychooncology 2011; 21:877-85. [DOI: 10.1002/pon.1981] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2010] [Revised: 03/22/2011] [Accepted: 03/23/2011] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Martine M. Goedendorp
- Expert Centre for Chronic Fatigue; Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre; Nijmegen the Netherlands
| | - Marieke F.M. Gielissen
- Medical Psychology; Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre; Nijmegen the Netherlands
| | - Marlies E.W.J. Peters
- Medical Oncology; Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre; Nijmegen the Netherlands
| | | | - Gijs Bleijenberg
- Expert Centre for Chronic Fatigue; Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre; Nijmegen the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Goedendorp MM, Peters MEWJ, Gielissen MFM, Witjes JA, Leer JW, Verhagen CAHHVM, Bleijenberg G. Is increasing physical activity necessary to diminish fatigue during cancer treatment? Comparing cognitive behavior therapy and a brief nursing intervention with usual care in a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Oncologist 2010; 15:1122-32. [PMID: 20930100 DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2010-0092] [Citation(s) in RCA: 67] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Two interventions for fatigue were given during curative cancer treatment. The aim of this multicenter randomized controlled trial (RCT) with three conditions was to demonstrate the efficacy and to determine the contribution of physical activity. METHODS Recruited from seven hospitals, 220 patients with various malignancies participated in a RCT. The brief nursing intervention (BNI) consisted of two 1-hour sessions, 3 months apart, given by 12 trained nurses, focusing only on physical activity. Cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) consisted of up to ten 1-hour sessions, within 6 months, provided by two therapists, focusing on physical activity and psychosocial elements. The control group received only usual care (UC). Assessments took place before and at least 2 months after cancer treatment, when patients had recovered from acute fatigue. Fatigue was the primary outcome. Efficacy was tested using analyses of covariance. A nonparametric bootstrap approach was used to test whether the effect on fatigue was mediated by physical activity. RESULTS The CBT group was significantly less fatigued than the UC group. Between the BNI and the UC groups, no significant difference was found in fatigue. The mediation hypothesis was rejected. DISCUSSION CBT given during curative cancer treatment proved to be an effective intervention to reduce fatigue at least 2 months after cancer treatment. The BNI was not effective. Contrary to what was expected, physical activity did not mediate the effect of CBT on fatigue. Thus, the reduction in fatigue elicited by CBT was realized without a lasting increase in physical activity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martine M Goedendorp
- Expert Centre for Chronic Fatigue, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Goedendorp MM, Knoop H, Schippers GM, Bleijenberg G. The lifestyle of patients with chronic fatigue syndrome and the effect on fatigue and functional impairments. J Hum Nutr Diet 2009; 22:226-31. [PMID: 19226353 DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-277x.2008.00933.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Little is known about the lifestyle of patients with chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) and its influence on symptoms of CFS. The present study aimed to investigate the lifestyle of patients with CFS, and to assess whether lifestyle factors are related to fatigue and functional impairments. METHODS Two hundred and forty-seven patients fulfilling the Center for Disease Control criteria for CFS were included. Validated questionnaires were used to collect data on lifestyle factors, smoking, intake of alcohol, fat, fibres, fruit and vegetables, body mass index (BMI), fatigue severity and functional impairments. RESULTS Of the CFS patients, 23% smoked, 32% had an unhealthy BMI, and none had an unhealthy alcohol intake. A majority had an unhealthy food intake: 70% had unhealthy fat, fruit and vegetable intake, and 95% had unhealthy fibre intake. Compared with the general Dutch population, significantly fewer CFS patients were overweight. Significantly more female CFS patients abstained from alcohol, and fewer male CFS patients smoked. Unhealthy lifestyle factors were not significantly associated with fatigue severity or functional impairments. CONCLUSIONS CFS patients tend to lead a healthier lifestyle compared to the general Dutch population. However, no relationship was found between lifestyle factors and fatigue severity and functional impairments in CFS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M M Goedendorp
- Expert Centre for Chronic Fatigue, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Goedendorp MM, Gielissen MFM, Verhagen CAH, Peters MEJW, Bleijenberg G. Severe fatigue and related factors in cancer patients before the initiation of treatment. Br J Cancer 2008; 99:1408-14. [PMID: 18941462 PMCID: PMC2579682 DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604739] [Citation(s) in RCA: 67] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
It is generally known that fatigue is a common symptom during cancer treatment, and in cancer survivors. However, fatigue was never studied after diagnosis, before cancer treatment was initiated. This study investigated the prevalence of severe fatigue, and related factors, in cancer patients before the initiation of treatment. One hundred and seventy-nine patients with various malignancies were assessed before start of treatment with curative intention, including the Checklist Individual Strength, Sickness Impact Profile, Beck Depression Inventory Primary Care, Symptom Checklist-90, and six Numeric Rating Scales to measure fatigue, pain and physical activity. To test which factors contributed to severe fatigue a logistic regression analysis was performed. In total 23.5% patients were severely fatigued, varying between diagnoses; prostate cancer (14.3%), breast cancer (20.3%), and gastrointestinal cancer (28.1%). Currently lower physical activity (P=0.013), more depressive mood (P=0.014), impaired sleep and rest during the day and night (P=0.045), and fatigue 1 year before diagnosis (P=0.005) contributed to severe fatigue. Relatively large numbers of cancer patients already experience severe fatigue before initiation of treatment, varying between 14–28%. The factors that contributed to severe fatigue at this stage were physical activity, depressive mood, impaired sleep and rest, and fatigue 1 year before diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M M Goedendorp
- Expert Centre Chronic Fatigue, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, 4628, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|