Effect of Physical Exercise on MRI-Assessed Brain Perfusion in Chemotherapy-Treated Breast Cancer Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Exercise is a promising intervention to alleviate cognitive problems in breast cancer patients, but studies on mechanisms underlying these effects are lacking.

PURPOSE

Investigating whether an exercise intervention can affect cerebral blood flow (CBF) in cognitively impaired breast cancer patients and to determine if CBF changes relate to memory function.

STUDY TYPE

Prospective.

POPULATION

A total of 181 chemotherapy-treated stage I-III breast cancer patients with cognitive problems and relatively low physical activity levels (≤150 minutes moderate to vigorous physical activity per week), divided into an exercise (N = 91) or control group (N = 90).

FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE

Two-dimensional echo planar pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling CBF sequence at 3 T.

ASSESSMENT

The 6-month long intervention consisted of (supervised) aerobic and strength training, 4 × 1 hour/week. Measurements at baseline (2-4 years post-diagnosis) and after 6 months included gray matter CBF in the whole brain, hippocampus, anterior cingulate cortex, and posterior cingulate cortex. Physical fitness and memory function were also assessed. Subgroup analyses were performed in patients with high fatigue levels at baseline.

STATISTICAL TESTS

Multiple regression analyses with a two-sided alpha of 0.05 for all analyses.

RESULTS

There was a significant improvement in physical fitness (VO2peak in mL/minute/kg) in the intervention group (N = 53) compared to controls (N = 51, β = 1.47 mL/minute/kg, 95% CI: 0.44-2.50). However, no intervention effects on CBF were found (eg, whole brain: P = 0.565). Highly fatigued patients showed larger but insignificant treatment effects on CBF (eg, whole brain: P = 0.098). Additionally, irrespective of group, a change in physical fitness was positively associated with changes in CBF (eg, whole brain: β = 0.75, 95% CI: 0.07-1.43). There was no significant relation between CBF changes and changes in memory performance.

DATA CONCLUSION

The exercise intervention did not affect CBF of cognitively affected breast cancer patients. A change in physical fitness was associated with changes in CBF, but changes in CBF were not associated with memory functioning.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

1 TECHNICAL EFFICACY STAGE: 5.

Moderators of exercise effects on self-reported cognitive functioning in cancer survivors: an individual participant data meta-analysis

PURPOSE

This individual participant data meta-analysis (IPD-MA) assesses exercise effects on self-reported cognitive functioning (CF) and investigates whether effects differ by patient-, intervention-, and exercise-related characteristics.

METHODS

IPD from 16 exercise RCTs, including 1987 patients across multiple types of non-metastatic cancer, was pooled. A one-stage IPD-MA using linear mixed-effect models was performed to assess exercise effects on self-reported CF (z-score) and to identify whether the effect was moderated by sociodemographic, clinical, intervention- and exercise-related characteristics, or fatigue, depression, anxiety, and self-reported CF levels at start of the intervention (i.e., baseline). Models were adjusted for baseline CF and included a random intercept at study level to account for clustering of patients within studies. A sensitivity analysis was performed in patients who reported cognitive problems at baseline.

RESULTS

Minimal significant beneficial exercise effects on self-reported CF (β=-0.09 [-0.16; -0.02]) were observed, with slightly larger effects when the intervention was delivered post-treatment (n=745, β=-0.13 [-0.24; -0.02]), and no significant effect during cancer treatment (n=1,162, β=-0.08 [-0.18; 0.02]). Larger effects were observed in interventions of 12 weeks or shorter (β=-0.14 [-0.25; -0.04]) or 24 weeks or longer (β=-0.18 [-0.32; -0.02]), whereas no effects were observed in interventions of 12-24 weeks (β=0.01 [-0.13; 0.15]). Exercise interventions were most beneficial when provided to patients without anxiety symptoms (β=-0.10 [-0.19; -0.02]) or after completion of treatment in patients with cognitive problems (β=-0.19 [-0.31; -0.06]). No other significant moderators were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

This cross-cancer IPD meta-analysis observed small beneficial exercise effects on self-reported CF when the intervention was delivered post-treatment, especially in patients who reported cognitive problems at baseline.

IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS

This study provides some evidence to support the prescription of exercise to improve cognitive functioning. Sufficiently powered trials are warranted to make more definitive recommendations and include these in the exercise guidelines for cancer survivors.

Perceived facilitators and barriers by esophageal cancer survivors participating in a post-treatment exercise program

PURPOSE

Participation in a post-treatment exercise program improves cardiorespiratory fitness and aspects of quality of life for esophageal cancer survivors. For optimal effects, high adherence to the exercise intervention is important. We assessed which facilitators and barriers to exercise adherence are perceived by esophageal cancer survivors, who participate in a post-treatment exercise program.

METHODS

The current qualitative study was performed within the randomized controlled PERFECT trial, in which we investigated effects of a 12-week supervised exercise program with moderate-to-high intensity and daily physical activity advice. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with patients randomized to the exercise group. A thematic content approach was used to derive perceived facilitators and barriers.

RESULTS

Thematic saturation was reached after inclusion of sixteen patients. Median session attendance was 97.9% (IQR 91.7-100%), and relative dose intensity (compliance) to all exercises was ≥90.0%. Adherence to the activity advice was 50.0% (16.7-60.4%). Facilitators and barriers were captured in seven themes. The most important facilitators were patients' own intention to engage in exercise and supervision by a physiotherapist. Barriers were mainly experienced in completion of the activity advice, and included logistic factors and physical complaints.

CONCLUSIONS

Esophageal cancer survivors are well capable to attend a moderate-to-high intensity post-treatment exercise program, and to fulfill the exercises according to protocol. This is facilitated by patients' own intention to engage in exercise and supervision of the physiotherapist, and only minimally affected by barriers as logistic factors and physical complaints.

IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS

When implementing postoperative exercise programs in clinical care, it can be useful to be aware of perceived facilitators and barriers of cancer survivors in order to achieve optimal exercise adherence and maximize beneficial exercise effects.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Dutch Trial Register NTR 5045.

Effect of physical exercise on the hippocampus and global grey matter volume in breast cancer patients: A randomized controlled trial (PAM study)

BACKGROUND

Physical exercise in cancer patients is a promising intervention to improve cognition and increase brain volume, including hippocampal volume. We investigated whether a 6-month exercise intervention primarily impacts total hippocampal volume and additionally hippocampal subfield volumes, cortical thickness and grey matter volume in previously physically inactive breast cancer patients. Furthermore, we evaluated associations with verbal memory.

METHODS

Chemotherapy-exposed breast cancer patients (stage I-III, 2-4 years post diagnosis) with cognitive problems were included and randomized in an exercise intervention (n = 70, age = 52.5 ± 9.0 years) or control group (n = 72, age = 53.2 ± 8.6 years). The intervention consisted of 2x1 hours/week of supervised aerobic and strength training and 2x1 hours/week Nordic or power walking. At baseline and at 6-month follow-up, volumetric brain measures were derived from 3D T1-weighted 3T magnetic resonance imaging scans, including hippocampal (subfield) volume (FreeSurfer), cortical thickness (CAT12), and grey matter volume (voxel-based morphometry CAT12). Physical fitness was measured with a cardiopulmonary exercise test. Memory functioning was measured with the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R total recall) and Wordlist Learning of an online cognitive test battery, the Amsterdam Cognition Scan (ACS Wordlist Learning). An explorative analysis was conducted in highly fatigued patients (score of ≥ 39 on the symptom scale 'fatigue' of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire), as previous research in this dataset has shown that the intervention improved cognition only in these patients.

RESULTS

Multiple regression analyses and voxel-based morphometry revealed no significant intervention effects on brain volume, although at baseline increased physical fitness was significantly related to larger brain volume (e.g., total hippocampal volume: R = 0.32, B = 21.7 mm³, 95 % CI = 3.0 - 40.4). Subgroup analyses showed an intervention effect in highly fatigued patients. Unexpectedly, these patients had significant reductions in hippocampal volume, compared to the control group (e.g., total hippocampal volume: B = -52.3 mm³, 95 % CI = -100.3 - -4.4)), which was related to improved memory functioning (HVLT-R total recall: B = -0.022, 95 % CI = -0.039 - -0.005; ACS Wordlist Learning: B = -0.039, 95 % CI = -0.062 - -0.015).

CONCLUSIONS

No exercise intervention effects were found on hippocampal volume, hippocampal subfield volumes, cortical thickness or grey matter volume for the entire intervention group. Contrary to what we expected, in highly fatigued patients a reduction in hippocampal volume was found after the intervention, which was related to improved memory functioning. These results suggest that physical fitness may benefit cognition in specific groups and stress the importance of further research into the biological basis of this finding.

Effect of physical exercise on cognitive function after chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer: A randomized controlled trial (PAM study)

12015

Background: Chemotherapy is associated with cognitive problems. Physical exercise is a promising intervention. We investigated whether exercise improves cognition in chemotherapy-exposed breast cancer (BC) patients 2-4 years after diagnosis. Methods: In the PAM study, we randomized chemotherapy-exposed BC patients with self-reported and test-confirmed cognitive problems to an exercise or control group. The 6-month exercise intervention consisted of 2 hours of supervised aerobic and resistance training and two hours of Nordic/power walking. Memory function measured with the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R) was our primary outcome. Further measurements included online neuropsychological tests (Amsterdam Cognition Scan; ACS), self-reported cognitive complaints (MDASI-MM, EORTC QLQ C-30 cognitive functioning), physical fitness (VO2peak), fatigue (MFI, EORTC fatigue), quality of life (QoL; EORTC), anxiety (HADS) and depression (HADS, PHQ9). HVLT-R total recall was analyzed with a Fisher exact test for clinically relevant improvement of ≥5 words. Other outcomes were analyzed using multiple regression analyses adjusted for baseline and stratification factors. An hypothesis driven but not pre-specified analysis in patients with high baseline EORTC fatigue levels (≥39) was performed. Results: We randomized 181 patients to the exercise (n = 91) or control group (n = 90). Two-third of the patients attended ≥ 80% of the exercise program and physical fitness significantly improved compared to the control patients ( VO2peak1.4 ml/min/kg, 95% CI 0.6; 2.2). No difference in favor of the intervention group was seen on the primary cognitive outcome or other cognitive tests. However, significant beneficial intervention effects were found for self-reported cognition (MDASI-MM Severity (-0.7, -1.2;-0.1)), fatigue (general fatigue (-2.2, -3.3; -1.1), physical fatigue (-3.3, -4.4; -2.2), mental fatigue (-1.0, -2.0; 0.0), reduced motivation (-1.1, -2.0; -0.2) and reduced activity (-2.1, -3.2; -1.1)), QoL (summary score (4.0, 1.2; 6.7), global health status (5.8, 1.1; 10.6), role functioning (7.2, 1.3; 13.1) and social functioning (5.9, 0.2; 11.6)) and depression (PHQ9 (-1.16, -2.19; -0.13)). In high-fatigued patients, exercise did show significant positive effects on objective cognitive function (ACS Reaction Time (-26.8, -52.9; -0.6) and ACS Wordlist Learning (4.4, 0.5; 8.3)). Conclusions: A 6-month exercise intervention did not improve objectively measured cognitive function in chemotherapy-exposed BC patients with cognitive problems. However, self-reported cognitive function, physical fitness, fatigue, QoL and depression did improve. Unplanned analysis indicated a small positive effect of exercise on cognitive functioning in high-fatigued patients. Clinical trial information: NTR6104.

Effect of physical exercise on cognitive function and brain measures after chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer (PAM study): protocol of a randomised controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

After treatment with chemotherapy, many patients with breast cancer experience cognitive problems. While limited interventions are available to improve cognitive functioning, physical exercise showed positive effects in healthy older adults and people with mild cognitive impairment. The Physical Activity and Memory study aims to investigate the effect of physical exercise on cognitive functioning and brain measures in chemotherapy-exposed patients with breast cancer with cognitive problems.

METHODS AND ANALYTICS

One hundred and eighty patients with breast cancer with cognitive problems 2-4 years after diagnosis are randomised (1:1) into an exercise intervention or a control group. The 6-month exercise intervention consists of twice a week 1-hour aerobic and strength exercises supervised by a physiotherapist and twice a week 1-hour Nordic or power walking. The control group is asked to maintain their habitual activity pattern during 6 months. The primary outcome (verbal learning) is measured at baseline and 6 months. Further measurements include online neuropsychological tests, self-reported cognitive complaints, a 3-tesla brain MRI, patient-reported outcomes (quality of life, fatigue, depression, anxiety, work performance), blood sampling and physical fitness. The MRI scans and blood sampling will be used to gain insight into underlying mechanisms. At 18 months online neuropsychological tests, self-reported cognitive complaints and patient-reported outcomes will be repeated.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Study results may impact usual care if physical exercise improves cognitive functioning for breast cancer survivors.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NTR6104.

Attendance and compliance with an exercise program during localized breast cancer treatment in a randomized controlled trial: The PACT study

PURPOSE

Maintaining high adherence rates (session attendance and compliance) in exercise programs during breast cancer treatment can be challenging. We aimed to identify adherence rates and predictors to an exercise program during adjuvant breast cancer treatment.

METHODS

Ninety-two patients with localized breast cancer undergoing chemotherapy were randomly assigned to an 18-week supervised moderate-to-high intensity aerobic and resistance exercise program, including two 1-hour sessions/week. Additionally, participants were asked to be physically active for at least 30 minutes/day on at least three other days. We report median percentages for attendance, compliance with the prescribed duration and intensity of aerobic and muscle strength exercises, and the exercise advice given. Predictors included in univariate and multivariable linear regression models were demographical, tumor- and treatment-related factors, constructs of the theory of planned behavior, psychological and physical factors.

RESULTS

Patients attended 83% (interquartile range: 69-91%) of the supervised sessions. Compliance with the duration of aerobic exercise, high-intensity aerobic exercise (cycling at the ventilatory threshold), muscle strength exercises and the exercise advice were 88%(64-97%), 50%(22-82%), 84%(65-94%) and 61%(33%-79%), respectively. Education, radiotherapy, BMI and physical fatigue were important predictors of adherence to supervised exercise. Beliefs about planned behaviors were important predictors, especially for compliance with the exercise advice.

CONCLUSIONS

Attendance to and compliance with an 18-week aerobic and strength exercise program were high. The lowest compliance was found for high-intensity supervised aerobic exercise. The identified predictors should be considered when designing or adapting exercise programs for patients with localized breast cancer to increase adherence.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN43801571 Dutch Trial Register NTR2138.

Four-year effects of exercise on fatigue and physical activity in patients with cancer

BACKGROUND

In the earlier randomized controlled Physical Activity during Cancer Treatment (PACT) study, we found beneficial effects of an 18-week supervised exercise program on fatigue in patients with newly diagnosed breast or colon cancer undergoing adjuvant treatment. The present study assessed long-term effects of the exercise program on levels of fatigue and physical activity 4 years after participation in the PACT study.

METHODS

The original study was a two-armed, multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing an 18-week supervised exercise program to usual care among 204 breast cancer patients and 33 colon cancer patients undergoing adjuvant treatment. Of the 237 PACT participants, 197 participants were eligible and approached to participate in the 4-year post-baseline measurements, and 128 patients responded. We assessed fatigue and physical activity levels at 4 years post-baseline and compared this to levels at baseline, post-intervention (18 weeks post-baseline), and at 36 weeks post-baseline.

RESULTS

Intention-to-treat mixed linear effects model analyses showed that cancer patients in the intervention group reported significantly higher moderate-to-vigorous total physical activity levels (141.46 min/week (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.31, 281.61, effect size (ES) = 0.22) after 4 years compared to the usual care group. Furthermore, cancer patients in the intervention group tended to experience less physical fatigue at 4 years post-baseline compared to the usual care group (- 1.13, 95% CI -2.45, 0.20, ES = 0.22), although the result was not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

Patients with breast or colon cancer who participated in the 18-week exercise intervention showed significant higher levels of moderate-to-vigorous total physical activity levels and a tendency towards lower physical fatigue levels 4 years post-baseline. Our result indicate that exercising during chemotherapy is a promising strategy for minimizing treatment-related side effects, both short and long term.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN43801571 , Dutch Trial Register NTR2138 . Trial registered on 9 December 2009.

Perceived facilitators and barriers to physical exercise adherence in esophageal cancer patients after surgery

94

Background: To achieve optimal effects of exercise interventions in esophageal cancer patients, high adherence is needed. Knowledge on facilitators and barriers can help improving exercise adherence. Hence, the aim of this study is to evaluate perceived facilitators and barriers to physical exercise adherence in esophageal cancer patients in the first year after surgery. Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with patients (n = 16) who were randomised to the exercise group of the Physical ExeRcise Following Esophageal Cancer Treatment (PERFECT) Study. Patients participated in a 12-week supervised combined aerobic and resistance exercise program twice weekly, and were advised to be physically active at least 30 minutes each day. Physiotherapists registered attendance at the supervised sessions and compliance (i.e., performing the exercises according to protocol). Transcribed interviews were analysed using a thematic content approach. Results: Median attendance was 97.9%, interquartile range (IQR): 91.7 – 100%. Median compliance to both components of the exercise program was high: 89.6% (IQR 75.5 – 95.8%) for aerobic exercise and 88.0% (IQR 73.8 – 93.6%) for resistance exercise. The most important perceived facilitators were patients’ own attitudes towards exercise (i.e. motivation, commitment and personal goals) and supervision by a physiotherapist. There were only few perceived barriers, of which the most frequently mentioned were logistic factors (i.e. holidays, conflicting activities and weather circumstances) and impaired physical condition due to regular endoscopic esophageal dilation therapy or general physical complaints, such as fatigue. Conclusions: Esophageal cancer patients after surgery are well capable to perform physical exercise with moderate-to-high intensity. The most important perceived facilitators for the high adherence rates are patients’ own attitudes towards exercise and supervision by a physiotherapist. Completion of the exercise program was only minimally affected by perceived barriers as logistic factors and physical complaints. This information can help in designing future exercise programs for clinical practice.

Four-year effects of physical exercise during adjuvant treatment on fatigue and physical activity in breast and colon cancer patients

99

Background: A recent randomized trial, the PACT study, showed beneficial effects on fatigue and physical fitness after an 18-week supervised exercise program in breast and colon cancer patients undergoing adjuvant treatment. So far, little is known on long-term effects of exercising during adjuvant treatment on fatigue and whether physical activity levels could be maintained. The latter is important to preserve achieved beneficial health effects. The present study assessed effects of the exercise intervention on fatigue and physical activity on average 4 years after participation in the PACT study. Methods: The PACT study was a 2-armed, multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing an 18-week supervised exercise program to usual care among 204 breast cancer patients and 33 colon cancer patients undergoing adjuvant treatment including chemotherapy. Of the 237 participants, 197 patients were eligible and approached to participate in the 4-year follow-up measurements, and finally 128 patients responded (intervention (n = 70), usual care (n = 58)). Fatigue (MFI) and physical activity levels (SQUASH) was assessed at baseline, post-intervention (at 18 weeks), 36-week post-baseline and 4 years post-baseline. Results: Intention-to-treat mixed linear model analyses showed that cancer patients in the intervention group experienced less physical fatigue at 4-year post-baseline compared to the usual care group (-1.13, 95% CI -2.45;0.20, effect size (ES) = 0.22), although not statistically significant. Furthermore, cancer patients in the intervention group reported significantly higher moderate-to-vigorous total physical activity levels (141.77 min/week (CI 95% 1.31;281.61, ES = 0.22) after 4 years compared to the usual care group. Conclusions: Breast and colon cancer patients, who participated in an 18-week exercise intervention during adjuvant treatment, showed significant higher levels of moderate-to-vigorous total physical activity levels and a tendency towards lower physical fatigue levels 4-year post-baseline. Exercise during chemotherapy might be a promising strategy for minimizing treatment-related side-effects both in the short- and long-term. Clinical trial information: NTR2138.