Occupational allergic contact dermatitis from systemic drugs

Evaluation of environmental antibiotic contamination by surface wipe sampling in a large care centre

OBJECTIVES

Exposure of healthcare workers to antibiotics may cause adverse health effects. Results of environmental contamination with antibiotics, obtained by taking surface wipe samples, can be used as an indicator for potential exposure to these sensitizing drugs. The objective was to describe the results of repeated measurements of contamination with antibiotics on multiple surfaces in hospital wards. Standardized needle and syringe preparation techniques and cleaning procedures were used.

METHODS

The preparation table and the floor around the waste bin in six wards were sampled and analysed for contamination with the antibiotics amoxicillin, benzylpenicillin, cefotaxime, ceftriaxone, flucloxacillin, meropenem, piperacillin and vancomycin. Sampling was performed in four trials during 8 months. Depending on the outcome of the trials, the cleaning procedure was adapted. Liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry was used for the analysis of the drugs.

RESULTS

During the four trials, contamination with all eight antibiotics was omnipresent on all preparation tables and floors in the six wards. The highest contamination was found for amoxicillin (1291 ng/cm2). Changing the cleaning procedure did not reduce the level of contamination.

CONCLUSIONS

Surface contamination with the antibiotics was widespread and most probably caused by spillage during the preparation in combination with an ineffective cleaning procedure. Strategies should be developed and implemented by institutions for safe handling of antibiotics to reduce environmental contamination and potential exposure of healthcare workers to these sensitizing drugs.

Using Fume Hood to Reduce Nurses' Exposure to Particulate Matters Dispersed Into the Air During Pill Crushing

BACKGROUND

Pill crushing is a common practice in patient care settings. Crushing pills can disperse particulate matter (PM) into indoor air. The PM is a widespread air pollutant composed of microscopic particles and droplets of various sizes and may carry active and/or inactive ingredients nurses can inhale. This study aimed to quantify PM sizes and concentration in indoor air when pills are crushed and examine the role of a fume hood in reducing particulate pollution.

METHODS

Two scenarios (with and without a fume hood) representing nurses' pill-crushing behaviors were set up in a positive-pressure cleanroom. Two acetaminophen tablets (325 mg/tablet) were crushed into powder and mixed with unsweetened applesauce. The PM sizes and concentrations were measured before and during crushing.

RESULTS

Different sizes of PM, including inhalable, respirable, and thoracic particles, were emitted during medication crushing. The total count of all particle sizes and mass concentrations of particles were significantly lower during crushing when a fume hood was used (p = .00).

CONCLUSION

Pill crushing increases PM and should be considered a workplace safety health hazard for nurses. Healthcare professionals should work under a fume hood when crushing pills and wear proper protective equipment. The findings of significant particulate pollution related to pill crushing suggest that further research is warranted.

[Evaluation of the "Health management guideline on occupational allergy in nursing occupations and its primary prevention" by nursing managers]

OBJECTIVE

Individuals in nursing occupations are often exposed to various materials such as rubber products and drugs, and they comprise a population at high risk of developing occupational allergies. We therefore created a "Health management guideline on occupational allergy in nursing occupations and its primary prevention" (hereinafter referred to as "HMG") and conducted a questionnaire survey to elucidate its potential use and the challenges of implementing it in clinical practice.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

The HMG includes the following content: A. Basic knowledge of occupational allergies; B. Common occupational allergies in nursing occupations; C. Occupational allergies triggered by specific antigens in nursing occupations; D. Eczema and skincare for hands; and E. Health management for occupational allergies. A questionnaire survey was conducted on one nursing manager each from 80 hospitals, with at least 400 beds. The survey included questions to gauge the level of understanding the content described in the HMG and opinions on incorporating the management method. The ethics committee of the researcher's institution approved the study.

RESULTS

Responses were obtained from 30 nursing managers. Over 70% responded that they understood the instructions for [occupational allergies], [common occupational allergies in nursing occupations], and [eczema and skincare for hands] presented in the HMG, and 100% said they either understood or mostly understood them. For [work management], 57% said they understood the content and 90% wanted to incorporate it. Furthermore, 10% responded that they wanted to incorporate the guidelines but did not believe it was feasible, given that "achieving general awareness and efforts involving other occupations are difficult." For [work environment management], 53% said they understood the content and 83% wanted to incorporate it. Additionally, 17% responded that they wanted to incorporate it but did not believe it was feasible, amid concerns that "allergen monitoring is difficult in reality" and "installation of local ventilation systems seems difficult."

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS

The HMG was postulated to be useful in providing knowledge on occupational allergy and health management methods, and for employing in clinical practice. The study recommended that in order to specifically incorporate the management methods, it is imperative that the entire hospital, including staff from other occupations, understand the guidelines and make adjustments accordingly.