Complete mesocolic resection and extended lymphadenectomy for colon cancer: a systematic review

Extent of Lymphadenectomy for Surgical Management of Right-Sided Colon Cancer: The Randomized Phase III RELARC Trial

PURPOSE

Complete mesocolic excision (CME) is being increasingly used for the treatment of right-sided colon cancer, although there is still no strong evidence that CME provides better long-term oncological outcomes than D2 dissection. The controversy is mainly regarding the survival benefit from extended lymph node dissection emphasized by CME.

METHODS

This multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02619942) was performed across 17 hospitals in China. Patients diagnosed with stage T2-T4aNanyM0 or TanyN + M0 right-sided colon cancer were randomly assigned (1:1) to undergo either CME or D2 dissection during laparoscopic right colectomy. The primary outcome was the 3-year disease-free survival (DFS), and the main secondary outcome was the 3-year overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Between January 11, 2016, and December 26, 2019, 1,072 patients were randomly assigned (536 patients to CME and 536 patients to D2 dissection). In total, 995 patients (median age 61 years, 59% male) were included in the primary analysis (CME [n = 495] v D2 dissection [n = 500]). No significant differences were found between the groups in 3-year DFS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.74 [95% CI, 0.54 to 1.02]; P = .06; 86.1% in the CME group v 81.9% in the D2 group) or in 3-year OS (HR, 0.70 [95% CI, 0.43 to 1.16]; P = .17; 94.7% in the CME group v 92.6% in the D2 group).

CONCLUSION

This trial failed to find evidence of superior DFS outcome for CME compared with standard D2 lymph node dissection in primary surgical excision of right-sided colon cancer. Standard D2 dissection should be the routine procedure for these patients. CME should only be considered in patients with obvious mesocolic lymph node involvement.

Comparison of Postoperative Outcomes and Long-Term Survival Rates between Patients Who Underwent Robotic and Laparoscopic Complete Mesocolic Excision for Right-Sided Colon Cancer

Introduction: Right colon cancer often requires surgical intervention, and complete mesocolic excision (CME) has emerged as a standard procedure. The study aims to evaluate and compare the safety and efficacy of robotic and laparoscopic CME for patients with right colon cancer and 5-year survival rates examined to determine the outcomes. Materials and Methods: Patients who underwent CME for right-sided colon cancer between 2014 and 2021 were included in this study. Group differences of age, body mass index, operation time, bleeding amount, total harvested lymph nodes, and postoperative stay were analyzed by the Mann-Whitney U test. Group differences of sex, American Society of Anesthesiology, and tumor, node, and metastasis stage were analyzed by the Chi-squared test. Disease-free and overall survival were assessed using Kaplan-Meier curves with the log-rank Mantel-Cox test. Results: From 109 patients, 74 of them were 1:1 propensity score matched and used for analysis. Total harvested lymph node (P ≤ .001) and estimated blood loss (P = .031) were found to be statistically significant between the groups. We found no statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of disease-free and overall survival (P = .27, .86, respectively), and the mortality rate was 9.17%, with no deaths directly attributed to the surgery. Conclusions: Study shows that minimally invasive surgery is a feasible option for CME in right colon cancers, with acceptable overall survival rates. Although the robotic approach has a higher lymph node yield, there was no significant difference in survival rates. Further randomized trials are needed to determine the clinical significance of both approaches.

Effect of complete mesocolic excision (cme) on long-term survival after right colectomy for cancer: multivariate meta-analysis and restricted mean survival time estimation

INTRODUCTION

Debate exists concerning the impact of complete mesocolic excision (CME) on long-term oncological outcomes. The aim of this review was to condense the updated literature and assess the effect of CME on long-term survival after right colectomy for cancer.

METHODS

PubMed, MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched through July 2023. The included studies evaluated the effect of CME on survival. The primary outcome was long-term overall survival. Restricted mean survival time difference (RMSTD), hazard ratio (HR), and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used as pooled effect size measures. GRADE methodology was used to summarize the certainty of evidence.

RESULTS

Ten studies (3665 patients) were included. Overall, 1443 (39.4%) underwent CME. The RMSTD analysis shows that at 60-month follow-up, stage I-III CME patients lived 2.5 months (95% CI 1.1-4.1) more on average compared with noCME patients. Similarly, stage III patients that underwent CME lived longer compared to noCME patients at 55-month follow-up (6.1 months; 95% CI 3.4-8.5). The time-dependent HRs analysis for CME vs. noCME (stage I-III disease) shows a higher mortality hazard in patients with noCME at 6 months (HR 0.46, 95% CI 0.29-0.71), 12 months (HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.43-0.73), and 24 months (HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.57-0.92) up to 27 months.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that CME is associated with unclear OS benefit in stage I-III disease. Caution is recommended to avoid overestimation of the effect of CME in stage III disease since the marginal benefit of a more extended resection may have been influenced by tumor biology/molecular profile and multimodal adjuvant treatments.

Impact of imaging magnification on colorectal surgery: a matched analysis of a single tertiary center

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopy has been increasingly applied in colorectal surgery, and imaging systems have been improving concurrently. The present study aims to compare outcomes following colorectal surgery with the 4K and traditional high-definition (HD) video systems.

METHODS

All consecutive patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery between April 2016 and June 2020 were retrospectively retrieved from a prospective institutional database. The study population was matched according to the imaging system (4K versus HD groups) through a propensity score matching (PSM) based on perioperative characteristics of 15 patients. A stratified analysis according to surgical procedures (right, left colectomy, and low anterior resection) was also performed. Primary endpoints were intraoperative blood loss and perioperative transfusions. Also, intra- and postoperative morbidity, operative time, lymph node harvest, and length of hospital stay (LOS) were investigated as secondary outcomes.

RESULTS

After PSM, 225 patients were included in both 4K and HD groups. The intraoperative blood loss was significantly lower in the 4K group (p = 0.008), although no different volumes of blood transfusion were required. Postoperative complications presented in similar proportions, while significantly higher rates of abdominal collection (p = 0.045), reoperation (p = 0.005), and postoperative urinary disorders occurred in the HD group. After stratification, the right colectomy subgroup shared similar associations with the study population. LOS did not change between groups, although readmissions were significantly lower in the 4K group (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The 4K imaging system represents a technological advance providing better surgical outcomes, such as the minimization of intraoperative blood loss and postoperative morbidity.

Comparison of Robotic, Laparoscopic, and Open Resections of Nonmetastatic Colon Cancer

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic resection for colon cancer has not been associated with improvements in oncological outcomes in comparison to open resection. Robotic resections are associated with increased lymph node yield and radicality of mesenteric resection in patients with right-sided tumors. It is unclear whether lymph node yield is higher in robotic resections in other parts of the colon and whether higher lymph node yield is associated with improved survival.

OBJECTIVE

To compare survival rates between robotic, laparoscopic, and open resections in a large cohort of patients with nonmetastatic colon cancer.

DESIGN

This is a retrospective observational study.

SETTING

A single comprehensive cancer center.

PATIENTS

Patients who underwent resection of nonmetastatic primary colon cancer between January 2006 and December 2018.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Univariable and multivariable models were used to identify predictors of disease-free and overall survival. Lymph node yield and perioperative outcomes were compared between operative approaches.

RESULTS

There were 2398 patients who met the inclusion criteria: 699 (29%) underwent open, 824 (34%) underwent laparoscopic, and 875 (36%) underwent robotic resection. The median follow-up was 3.8 years (45.4 months). Robotic surgery was associated with higher lymph node yield and radicality of mesenteric resection. On multivariable analysis, the surgical approach was not associated with a difference in disease-free or overall survival. Minimally invasive colectomy was associated with fewer complications and shorter length of stay in comparison to open surgery. In a direct comparison between the 2 minimally invasive approaches, robotic colectomy was associated with fewer complications, shorter length of stay, and lower conversion rate than laparoscopy.

LIMITATIONS

This was a single-center retrospective study.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data indicate that the 3 surgical approaches are similarly effective in treating primary resectable colon cancer and that differences in outcomes are observed primarily in the early postoperative period. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/C115 .

COMPARACIN DE RESECCIONES ROBTICAS, LAPAROSCPICAS Y ABIERTAS DE CNCER DE COLON NO METASTSICO

ANTECEDENTES:La resección laparoscópica para el cáncer de colon no se ha asociado con mejoras en los resultados oncológicos en comparación con la resección abierta. Las resecciones robóticas se asocian con un mayor rendimiento de los ganglios linfáticos y la radicalidad de la resección mesentérica en pacientes con tumores del lado derecho. No está claro si la cosecha ganglionar es mayor en las resecciones robóticas en otras partes del colon y si un mayor rendimiento de los ganglios linfáticos se asocia con una mejor supervivencia.OBJETIVO:Comparar las tasas de supervivencia entre resecciones robóticas, laparoscópicas y abiertas en una gran cohorte de pacientes con cáncer de colon no metastásico.DISEÑO:Este es un estudio observacional retrospectivo.ESCENARIO:Este estudio se realizó en un único centro oncológico integral.PACIENTES:Pacientes que se sometieron a resección de cáncer de colon primario no metastásico entre enero de 2006 y diciembre de 2018.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Se utilizaron modelos univariables y multivariables para identificar predictores de supervivencia libre de enfermedad y global. La cosecha ganglionar y los resultados perioperatorios se compararon entre los abordajes quirúrgicos.RESULTADOS:Hubo 2398 pacientes que cumplieron con los criterios de inclusión: 699 (29%) se sometieron a cirugía abierta, 824 (34%) se sometieron a resección laparoscópica y 875 (36%) se sometieron a resección robótica. La mediana de seguimiento fue de 3,8 años (45,4 meses). La cirugía robótica se asoció con una mayor cosecha ganglionar y la radicalidad de la resección mesentérica. En el análisis multivariable, el abordaje quirúrgico no se asoció con una diferencia en la supervivencia general o libre de enfermedad. La colectomía mínimamente invasiva se asoció con menos complicaciones y una estancia más corta en comparación con la cirugía abierta. En una comparación directa entre los dos enfoques mínimamente invasivos, la colectomía robótica se asoció con menos complicaciones, una estancia más corta y una tasa de conversión más baja que la laparoscopia.LIMITACIONES:Este fue un estudio retrospectivo de un solo centro.CONCLUSIONES:Nuestros datos indican que los tres enfoques quirúrgicos son igualmente efectivos en el tratamiento del cáncer de colon resecable primario y que las diferencias en los resultados se observan principalmente en el período posoperatorio temprano. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/C115 . (Traducción-Dr. Felipe Bellolio ).

Importance of Arterial Vessel Length for Metastatic Lymph Node Retrieval and Survival in Standardized Left- and Right-Sided Colon Cancer Surgery

BACKGROUND

We investigated the localization of lymph node metastases, and the role of arterial vessel and specimen lengths in left- and right-sided colon cancer surgery, for survival.

METHODS

This was a prospective cross-sectional population-based study of specimens from patients who underwent standardized surgical resection for colon cancer in 2012-2015. The mesocolon of the specimens was divided into four sections for pathological analysis of lymph nodes. Multiple linear regression analysis was used to explore the relationship between lymph node counts and patient- and surgery-related factors. For survival analysis, a multivariable Cox regression method was used.

RESULTS

A total of 317 patients (160 females) were included. Median (range) age was 74 (30-95) years. Median number of lymph node retrieval was 32 (8-198) and was associated with increased specimen length but not to arterial vessel length. One hundred and thirty-three (42%) patients had lymph node metastases. All patients had these located < 5 cm from the tumour. Ten, two, and three specimens had lymph node metastases around the central and peripheral ligation of the ileocolic artery and at the central ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery, respectively. The tumour stages in these specimens were T3-4N2M0-1. No statistically significant survival benefit was associated with longer arterial vessel length (p = 0.429).

CONCLUSIONS

Neither retrieval of lymph nodes nor statistically significant survival was affected by vessel length in standardized left- and right-sided colon cancer surgery.

Caudal-to-Cranial Approach for Right Colectomy with Complete Mesocolic Excision in Colon Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

A newly emerging approach "caudal to cranial" with complete mesenteric excision (CME) has recently been proposed for right colectomy in patients with right colon cancer. To date, only a few studies about this approach have appeared. Our study aims to investigate the safety and efficacy of this new technique.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature was conducted to evaluate the evidence regarding short- and long-term outcomes after the caudal-to-cranial approach (CCA). Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies was used to evaluate methodological quality. The risk of bias was assessed using Robvis tool. Meta-analyses have been conducted for the outcomes of studies comparing CCA with other techniques.

RESULTS

We found six studies from 2017 to 2021 with a total of 594 patients. The postoperative complications and oncological outcomes were acceptable. Two studies comparing CCA to medial-to-lateral approach were included in the meta-analysis. No differences were found between the techniques regarding to operative time, length of hospital stay, overall morbidity, and number of lymph nodes.

CONCLUSION

Although the interpretation of our findings may be restrained by methodological limitations, risk of bias, and the absence of well-designed randomized controlled trials, CCA with CME in right-sided colon cancer may be a feasible and safe procedure.

Should Laparoscopic Complete Mesocolic Excision Be Offered to Elderly Patients to Treat Right-Sided Colon Cancer?

BACKGROUND

Despite its potential oncologic benefit, complete mesocolic excision (CME) has rarely been offered to elderly patients. The present study evaluated the effect of age on postoperative outcomes among patients undergoing laparoscopic right colectomies with CME for right-sided colon cancer (RCC).

METHODS

Data of patients undergoing laparoscopic right colectomies with CME for RCC between 2015 and 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. Selected patients were divided into two groups: the under-80 group and the over-80 group. Surgical, pathological, and oncological outcomes among the groups were compared.

RESULTS

A total of 130 patients were selected (95 in the under-80 group and 35 in the over-80 group). No difference was found between the groups in terms of postoperative outcomes, except for median length of stay and adjuvant chemotherapy received, which were in favor of the under-80 group (5 vs. 8 days, p < 0.001 and 26.3% vs. 2.9%, p = 0.003, respectively). No difference between the groups was found regarding overall survival and disease free survival. Using multivariate analysis, only the ASA score > 2 (p = 0.01) was an independent predictor of overall complications.

CONCLUSIONS

laparoscopic right colectomy with CME for RCC was safely performed in elderly patients ensuring similar oncological outcomes compared to younger patients.

Long-term oncologic outcome of D3 lymph node dissection for clinical stage 2/3 right-sided colon cancer

PURPOSE

To investigate oncologic outcomes including overall survival and disease-free survival depending on the extent of lymphadenectomy (D3 versus D2) by comparing D3 and D2 lymphadenectomy in patients with clinical stage 2/3 right colon cancer.

METHODS

Consecutive series of patients who underwent radical resection for right colon cancer at our three hospitals between January 2015 and June 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. Study cohorts were divided into two groups: D3 group and D2 group. Oncologic, pathologic, and perioperative outcomes of the two groups were compared.

RESULTS

A total of 295 patients (167 in the D2 group and 128 in the D3 group) were included in this study. Patients' characteristics showed no significant difference between the two groups. The median number of harvested lymph nodes was significantly higher in the D3 group than in the D2 group. The rate of complications was not significantly different between the two groups except for chyle leakage, which was more frequent in the D3 group. Five-year disease-free survival was 90.2% (95% CI: 84.8-95.9%) in the D3 group, which was significantly (p = 0.028) higher than that (80.5%, 95% CI: 74-87.5%) in the D2 group. There was no significant difference in overall survival between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Our results indicate that D3 lymphadenectomy is associated with more favorable 5-year disease-free survival than D2 lymphadenectomy for patients with stage 2/3 right-sided colon cancer. D3 lymphadenectomy might improve oncologic outcomes in consideration of the recurrence rate.

Definition and reporting of lymphadenectomy and complete mesocolic excision for radical right colectomy: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Several procedures have been proposed to reduce the rates of recurrence in patients with right-sided colon cancer. Different procedures for a radical right colectomy (RRC), including extended D3 lymphadenectomy, complete mesocolic excision and central vascular ligation have been associated with survival benefits by some authors, but results are inconsistent. The aim of this study was to assess the variability in definition and reporting of RRC, which might be responsible for significant differences in outcome evaluation.

METHODS

PRISMA-compliant systematic literature review to identify the definitions of RRC. Primary aims were to identify surgical steps and different nomenclature for RRC. Secondary aims were description of heterogeneity and overlap among different RRC techniques.

RESULTS

Ninety-nine articles satisfied inclusion criteria. Eight surgical steps were identified and recorded as specific to RRC: Central arterial ligation was described in 100% of the included studies; preservation of mesocolic integrity in 73% and dissection along the SMV plane in 67%. Other surgical steps were inconstantly reported. Six differently named techniques for RRC have been identified. There were 35 definitions for the 6 techniques and 40% of these were used to identify more than one technique.

CONCLUSIONS

The only universally adopted surgical step for RRC is central arterial ligation. There is great heterogeneity and consistent overlap among definitions of all RRC techniques. This is likely to jeopardise the interpretation of the outcomes of studies on the topic. Consistent use of definitions and reporting of procedures are needed to obtain reliable conclusions in future trials. PROSPERO CRD42021241650.

Mid-term oncological outcomes after complete versus conventional mesocolic excision for right-sided colon cancer: a propensity score matching analysis

BACKGROUND

The correct extent of mesocolic dissection for right-sided colon cancer (RCC) is still under debate. Complete mesocolic excision (CME) has not gained wide diffusion, mainly due to its technical complexity and unclear oncological superiority. This study aims to evaluate oncological outcomes of CME compared with non-complete mesocolic excision (NCME) during resection for I-III stage RCC.

METHOD

Prospectively collected data of patients who underwent surgery between 2010 and 2018 were retrospectively analysed. 1:1 Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance baseline characteristics of CME and NCME patients. The primary endpoint of the study was local recurrence-free survival (LRFS). The two groups were also compared in terms of short-term outcomes, distant recurrence-free survival, disease-free survival, and overall survival.

RESULTS

Of the 444 patients included in the study, 292 were correctly matched after PSM, 146 in each group. The median follow-up was 45 months (IQR 33-63). Conversion rate, complications, and 90-day mortality were comparable in both groups. The median number of lymph nodes harvested was higher in CME patients (23 vs 19, p = 0.034). 3-year LRFS rates for CME patients was 100% and 95.6% for NCME (log-rank p = 0.028). At 3 years, there were no differences between the groups in terms of overall survival, distant recurrence-free survival, and disease-free survival.

CONCLUSION

Our PSM cohort study shows that CME is safe, provides a higher number of lymph nodes harvested, and is associated with better local recurrence-free survival.

Laparoscopic Complete Mesocolic Excision Without Routine Gastro-Pancreatico-Colic Trunk Dissection: Survival Outcomes and Morbidity for 567 Cases

Purpose: It is unclear whether the principles of open complete mesocolic excision (CME) can be safely applied to laparoscopic surgery. Furthermore, definitions vary over how radical optimal CME surgery should be. We report morbidity and oncological outcomes for laparoscopic CME without routine gastro-pancreatico-colic trunk (GPCT) dissection. Materials and Methods: An observational study with consecutive data for patients with Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) stage I-III colon adenocarcinoma who underwent elective laparoscopic resection between 2006 and 2015. Data were retrieved for demographics, tumor characteristics, treatment, and histology from prospectively maintained databases. Standardized, routinely video recorded, laparoscopic resections were performed in two United Kingdom centers from The National Training Programme for Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery. Overall survival and disease-free survival (DFS) were reported using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression. Results: Laparoscopic CME was performed in 567 patients, 52.7% (288/546) women, median (interquartile range [IQR]) age 73 (65-80) years. Median (IQR) length of stay was 4 (3-5) days with 4.0 (2.2-5.7)-year follow-up. Significant DFS predictors (hazard ratio [HR]) by multivariable Cox regression were age >80 years (1.9), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) 3 and 4 (HR = 1.1), right colon cancer (1.7), UICC stage III (3.4), and intramesocolic grade (2.2). Overall 4-year DFS (95% confidence interval) was 81.3% (77-85). Four-year DFS by UICC grades I, II, and III was 94.6% (89-99), 83.4% (77-88), and 72.2% (66-78), respectively (log-rank P = .001). Morbidity by Clavien-Dindo grade was III 18 (3.2%), IV 4 (0.7%) and V 7 (1.2%). Conclusion: This large series suggests standardized laparoscopic CME without routine GPCT dissection has a low morbidity and achieves equivalent outcomes to the most radical open CME techniques.

Disease recurrence after right hemicolectomy in Scotland: Is there rationale to adopt complete mesocolic excision (CME)?

AIMS

Complete mesocolic excision (CME) has been proposed as a way to improve the oncological outcomes in patients with colon cancer. To investigate whether there is rationale for adopting the technique in Scotland, our aim was to define the incidence of disease recurrence following standard right hemicolectomy and to compare this with published CME outcomes.

METHODS

Data was collected on consecutive patients undergoing right or extended right hemicolectomy for colonic adenocarcinoma (2012-2017) at three hospitals in Scotland (Raigmore Hospital, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary and Glasgow Royal Infirmary). Emergency or palliative surgery was excluded. Patients were followed up with CT scans and colonoscopy for a minimum of 3 years.

RESULTS

689 patients (M 340, F 349) were included. 30-day mortality was 1.6%. Final pathological stage was Stage I (14%), Stage II (49.8%) and Stage III (36.1%). During follow-up, 10.5% developed loco-regional recurrence and 12.2% developed distant metastases. The 1, 3 and 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) was 94%, 84% and 82% respectively. Primary determinants of recurrence were T stage (p < 0.001), N stage (p < 0.001), apical node involvement (p < 0.001) and EMVI (p < 0.001). When compared to the literature, 30-day mortality was lower than many published series and DFS rates were similar to the largest CME study to date (4 year DFS 85.8% versus 83%).

CONCLUSION

The outcomes of patients undergoing right hemicolectomy in Scotland compare favourably with many published CME studies. The technique demands further evaluation before it can be recommended for adoption into routine surgical practice.

Clostridioides difficile toxin A-mediated Caco-2 cell barrier damage was attenuated by insect-derived fractions and corresponded to increased gene transcription of cell junctional and proliferation proteins

Pathogenesis of C. difficile in the intestine is associated with the secretion of toxins which can damage the intestinal epithelial layer and result in diseases such as diarrhoea. Treatment for C. difficile infections consists of antibiotics which, however, have non-specific microbiocidal effects and may cause intestinal dysbiosis which results in subsequent health issues. Therefore, alternative treatments to C. difficile infections are required. We investigated whether different black soldier fly- and mealworm-derived fractions, after applying the INFOGEST digestion protocol, could counteract C. difficile toxin A-mediated barrier damage of small intestinal Caco-2 cells. Treatment and pre-treatment with insect-derived fractions significantly (p < 0.05) mitigated the decrease of the transepithelial electrical resistance (TEER) of Caco-2 cells induced by C. difficile toxin A. In relation to these effects, RNA sequencing data showed an increased transcription of cell junctional and proliferation protein genes in Caco-2 cells. Furthermore, the transcription of genes regulating immune signalling was also increased. To identify whether this resulted in immune activation we used a Caco-2/THP-1 co-culture model where the cells were only separated by a permeable membrane. However, the insect-derived fractions did not change the basolateral secreted IL-8 levels in this model. To conclude, our findings suggest that black soldier fly- and mealworm-derived fractions can attenuate C. difficile induced intestinal barrier disruption and they might be promising tools to reduce the symptoms of C. difficile infections.

Complete mesocolic excision versus conventional surgery for colon cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

AIM

Complete mesocolic excision (CME) lacks consistent data advocating operative superiority compared to conventional surgery for colon cancer. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis, analysing population characteristics and perioperative, pathological and oncological outcomes.

METHODS

D3 extended lymphadenectomy dissection was considered comparable to CME, and D2 and D1 dissection to be comparable to conventional surgery. Outcomes reviewed included lymph node yield, R1 resection, overall complications, overall survival and disease-free survival.

RESULTS

In all, 3039 citations were identified; 148 studies underwent full-text reviews and 31 matched inclusion criteria: total cohort 26 640 patients (13 830 CME/D3 vs. 12 810 conventional). Overall 3- and 5-year survival was higher in the CME/D3 group compared with conventional surgery: relative risk (RR) 0.69 (95% CI 0.51-0.93, P = 0.016) and RR 0.78 (95% CI 0.64-0.95, P = 0.011) respectively. Five-year disease-free survival also demonstrated CME/D3 superiority (RR 0.67, 95% CI 0.52-0.86, P < 0.001), with similar findings at 1 and 3 years. There were no statistically significant differences between the CME/D3 and conventional group in overall complications (RR 1.06, 95% CI 0.97-1.14, P = 0.483) or anastomotic leak (RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.81-1.29, P = 0.647).

CONCLUSIONS

Meta-analysis suggests CME/D3 may have a better overall and disease-free survival compared to conventional surgery, with no difference in perioperative complications. Quality of evidence regarding survival is low, and randomized control trials are required to strengthen the evidence base.

Laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision versus conventional resection for right-sided colon cancer: a propensity score matching analysis of short-term outcomes

BACKGROUND

Complete mesocolic excision (CME) for right-sided colon cancer (RCC) is a demanding operation, especially when performed laparoscopically. The potential impact of CME in increasing postoperative complications is still unclear. The aim of our study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic CME compared with laparoscopic non-complete mesocolic excision (NCME) during colectomy for RCC.

METHODS

Data from a prospectively collected database of patients who underwent laparoscopic right and extended right colectomy at our institution between January 2008 and February 2020 were retrieved and analyzed. Short-term outcomes of patients undergoing CME and NCME were compared. A 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance baseline characteristics between groups.

RESULTS

A total of 663 consecutive patients underwent resection of RCC in the study period. Among these, 500 met the inclusion criteria and after PSM a total of 372 patients were correctly matched, 186 in each group. A similar rate of overall postoperative complications was found between the CME and NCME groups (21.5% and 18.3%, p = 0.436). No difference was found in terms of conversion rate, severe complications, reoperations, readmissions, and mortality. The median number of harvested lymph nodes was higher in the CME group (22 versus 19, p = 0.003), with a lower rate of inadequate sampling (7.0% and 15.1%, p = 0.013).

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic CME for RCC is technically feasible and safe. It does not seem to be associated with a higher rate of complications or mortality compared with the "traditional" approach, but it allows better nodal sampling.

Updates on Robotic CME for Right Colon Cancer: A Qualitative Systematic Review

Background. Complete mesocolic excision (CME) is a surgical technique introduced with the aim of ameliorating the oncologic results of colectomy. Various experiences have demonstrated favorable oncologic results of CME in comparison with standard colectomy, in which the principles of CME are not respected. The majority of the literature refers to open or laparoscopic CME. This review analyses current evidence regarding robotic CME for right colectomy. Methods. An extensive Medline (Pub Med) search for relevant case series, restricted to papers published in English, was performed, censoring video vignettes and case reports. Results. Fourteen studies (ten retrospective, four comparative series of robotic versus laparoscopic CME) were included, with patient numbers ranging from 20 to 202. Four different approaches to CME are described, which also depend on the robotic platform utilized. Intraoperative and early clinical results were good, with a low conversion and anastomotic leak rate and a majority of Clavien–Dindo complications being Grades I and II. Oncologic adequacy of the surgical specimens was found to be good, although a homogeneous histopathologic evaluation was not provided. Conclusions. Further large studies are warranted to define long-term oncologic results of robotic right colectomy with CME and its eventual benefits in comparison to laparoscopy.

Complete Mesocolic Excision and D3 Lymphadenectomy versus Conventional Colectomy for Colon Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUNDS

Previous systematic reviews suggest that the implementation of 'complete mesocolon excision' (CME) for colon tumors entails better specimen quality but with limited long-term outcomes. We performed a meta-analysis to compare the pathological, perioperative, and oncological results of CME with conventional surgery (CS) in primary colon cancer.

METHODS

Embase, MEDLINE and CENTRAL databases were searched using Medical Subject Headings for CME and D3 lymphadenectomy. The systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines.

RESULTS

A total of 18,989 patients from 27 studies were included. Postoperative complications were higher in the CME group (relative risk [RR] 1.13, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04-1.22, I² = 0%), while no differences were observed in terms of anastomotic leak (I² = 0%) or perioperative mortality (I² = 49%). CME was associated with a higher number of lymph nodes harvested (I² = 95%), distance to high tie (I² = 65%), bowel length (I² = 0%), and mesentery area (I² = 95%). CME also had positive effects on 3- and 5-year overall survival (RR 1.09, 95% CI 1.04-1.15, I² = 88%; and RR 1.05, 95% CI 1.02-1.08, I² = 62%, respectively) and 3-year disease-free survival (RR 1.10, 95% CI 1.04-1.17, I² = 22%), as well as decreased local (RR 0.35, 95% CI 0.24-0.51, I² = 51%) and distant recurrences (RR 0.71, 95% CI 0.60-0.85, I² = 34%).

CONCLUSIONS

Limited evidence suggests that CME improves oncological outcomes with a higher postoperative adverse events rate but no increase in anastomotic leak rate or perioperative mortality, compared with CS.

Oncological outcomes after complete mesocolic excision in right-sided colon cancer: a population-based study

AIM

Complete mesocolic excision (CME) has been proposed as the preferred surgical technique for resection of colon cancer. This prospective cohort study evaluates the effect of CME surgery on colon cancer mortality after right-sided hemicolectomy on a population level.

METHODS

Data from the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry and the Cause of Death Registry on all patients treated with elective right-sided hemicolectomy for colon cancer Stages I-III in the Stockholm County 2008-2012 were analysed. Adherence to principles of CME surgery was determined by structured analysis of anonymized surgical reports regarding the presence of five essential features. The exposure to CME was graded as group 0 (not exposed to CME), group 1 (intermediate) and group 2 (exposed to CME).

RESULTS

In total, 1171 patients were analysed with 234 (20.0%) patients in CME group 0, 453 (38.7%) patients in CME group 1 and 484 (41.3%) in CME group 2. The 5-year colon cancer mortality was 20.2% in CME group 0, 13.9% in CME group 1 and 13.1% in CME group 2 (P = 0.026). The adjusted hazard ratio for colon cancer mortality was 0.61 (95% CI 0.42-0.91; P = 0.014) for CME group 1 and 0.52 (95% CI 0.35-0.77; P = 0.001) for CME group 2.

DISCUSSION

The presence of predefined CME features in surgical reports was related to a graded benefit on cancer-specific mortality after right-sided hemicolectomy for colon cancer Stages I-III.

[Metastasis of the right colon mucinous adenocarcinoma to aortocaval and retropancreatic space: case report and literature review]

Metastases of the right colon cancer to extra-regional lymph nodes are rarely observed. Available literature data cannot be a reliable guide to choose the optimal treatment strategy. Indeed, excision of extra-regional lymph nodes is a rare experience and its results are poorly represented. According to our clinical experience, surgical intervention following comprehensive examination may be radical in patients with right colon cancer if distant metastases are absent. Resection of extra-regional lymph nodes can be safely performed in these cases. We report a patient with the right colon cancer and lesion of extra-regional lymph nodes behind the pancreatic head, paracaval and paraaortic space, hepatoduodenal ligament. Standard laparoscopic right-sided hemicolectomy with D-3 lymph node dissection was accompanied by resection of a conglomerate of nodal metastases behind the pancreatic head and superficial resection of the pancreas. Extra-regional lymph node excision is a reasonable option for colon mucinous adenocarcinoma stage I-III. However, comprehensive preoperative examination is required. Technical difficulty of extra-regional lymph node excision it is not the reason for limitation of surgical intervention. However, safe and total resection requires an adequate surgical approach.

Qualitative umbrella review of systematic reviews on complete mesocolic excision for colon cancer

BACKGROUND

Complete mesocolic excision (CME) of colon cancer with extended lymphadenectomy was suggested to improve radical resection of colon cancer. This comprehensive review aimed to assess the current literature for the outcomes of CME of colon cancer through an appraisal of the findings of published systematic reviews and meta-analyses.

METHODS

A systematic literature review searching for the studies that assessed the outcome of CME of colon cancer was conducted. Electronic databases were queried from 2009 through November 2020. The main objectives of this review were to illustrate the technical aspects and outcome of CME and to summarize the findings of the published systematic reviews.

RESULTS

Thirteen systematic reviews were retrieved. All reviews found CME to provide longer bowel, larger area of mesentery resected, and more lymph nodes (LNs) retrieved than standard colectomy. All systematic reviews except two found similar complication rates between CME and standard colectomy. Four systematic reviews documented the survival benefit of CME in regards to improved overall and disease-free survival. Using the laparoscopic approach for CME did not compromise the oncologic outcomes of the procedures, yet was associated with less intraoperative blood loss, faster recovery, and potential survival benefits.

CONCLUSIONS

CME is associated with better specimen quality, more LNs clearance, and potential survival benefits compared to standard colectomy. However, the lack of robust data from well-designed multicenter randomized trials may prevent drawing firm conclusions on the oncologic benefits of CME. Further high-quality studies are needed before recommending CME as the standard of care for colon cancer.

Complete mesocolic excision versus conventional hemicolectomy in patients with right colon cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Complete mesocolic excision (CME) has introduced a promising surgical approach for treatment of right colon cancer. However, benefits of CME are still a matter of debate. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess safety and long-term outcomes of CME versus conventional right hemicolectomy (CRH).

METHODS

We systematically searched MEDLINE, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase for retrieving studies comparing CME with CRH in right colon cancer. After data extraction from the included studies, meta-analysis was performed to compare postoperative complications, anastomotic leakage, 30-day mortality, number of lymph node yield, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Eight studies met the inclusion criteria with a total of 1871 patients enrolled. No difference was observed in postoperative complications (OR 1.13, 95% CI 0.88-1.47, p = 0.34). CME was associated with significantly higher number of lymph nodes retrieved (MD 9.17, CI 4.67-13.68, p < 0.001). CME also improved 3-year OS (OR 1.57, 95% CI 1.17-2.11, p = 0.003), 5-year OS (OR 1.41, 95% CI 1.06-1.89, p = 0.02), and 5-year DFS (OR 1.99, 95% CI 1.29-3.07, p = 0.002). A sub-group analysis for patients with stage III colon cancer showed no significant impact of CME on 3-year and 5-year OS (OR 2.47, 95% CI 0.86-7.06, p = 0.09; OR 1.23, 95% CI 0.78-1.94, p = 0.38).

CONCLUSION

Although with limited evidence, CME shows similar postoperative complication rates and an improved survival outcome compared with CRH.

Robotic complete mesocolic excision with central vascular ligation for right colonic tumours - a propensity score-matching study comparing with standard laparoscopy

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision (CME) of the right colon with central vascular ligation (CVL) is a technically demanding procedure. This study retrospectively evaluated the feasibility, safety and oncological outcomes of the procedure when performed using the da Vinci® robotic system.

METHODS

A prospective case series was collected over 3 years for patients with right colonic cancers treated by standardized robotic CME with CVL using the superior mesenteric vessels first approach. The CME group was compared to a 2 : 1 propensity score-matched non-CME group who had conventional laparoscopic right colectomy with D2 nodal dissection. Primary outcomes were total lymph node harvest and length of specimen. Secondary outcomes were operative time, postoperative complications, and disease-free and overall survival.

RESULTS

The study included 120 patients (40 in the CME group and 80 in the non-CME group). Lymph node yield was higher (29 versus 18, P = 0.006), the specimen length longer (322 versus 260 mm, P = 0.001) and median operative time was significantly longer (180 versus 130 min, P < 0.001) with robotic CME versus laparoscopy, respectively. Duration of hospital stay was longer with robotic CME, although not significantly (median 6 versus 5 days, P = 0.088). There were no significant differences in R0 resection rate, complications, readmission rates and local recurrence. A trend in survival benefit with robotic CME for disease-free (P = 0.0581) and overall survival (P = 0.0454) at 3 years was documented.

CONCLUSION

Robotic CME with CVL is feasible and, although currently associated with a longer operation time, it provides good specimen quality, higher lymph node yield and acceptable morbidity, with a disease-free survival advantage.

D3-lymphadenectomy enhances oncological clearance in patients with right colon cancer. Results of a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

D3-Lymphadenectomy, together with complete mesocolic excision (CME), were introduced to provide oncological results after right colon cancer. The aim of this systematic review with meta-analysis was to assess the short and long-term outcomes of right-sided hemicolectomy with CME + D3 as compared with classic right hemicolectomy. Secondary aims included the prevalence of D3-metastasis and skip metastasis when performing CME + D3.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A systematic review with meta-analysis was conducted, according to PRISMA methodology.

RESULTS

29 studies were enrolled (2592 patients). No differences were accounted in morbidity variables associated with the measured techniques. CME + D3 was significantly associated with a greater distance between the tumour and the closest vascular tie, a longer colonic resection, a wider resection of mesentery and an increased number of harvested lymph nodes. Regarding to long-terms outcomes, we found a significant decrease in local recurrence in patients undergoing CME + D3 (HR:0.17) and a significant improvement in 3-year and 5-year overall survival rates (HR:0.53 vs. HR:0.57, respectively), as well as an improving survival in patients with stage II and III disease. Overall prevalence of patients with lymphatic metastases in D3-territory was of 8.6% and 2.2% of skip metastases.

CONCLUSIONS

CME + D3 is a feasible surgical procedure that allows to obtain specimens with higher quality oncological resection, without greater associated morbidity, thus improving survival in patients with stage II and III right colon cancer.

Short-term outcomes of complete mesocolic excision versus D2 dissection in patients undergoing laparoscopic colectomy for right colon cancer (RELARC): a randomised, controlled, phase 3, superiority trial

BACKGROUND

Whether extended lymphadenectomy for right colon cancer leads to increased perioperative complications or improves survival is still controversial. This trial aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of complete mesocolic excision (CME) versus D2 dissection in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for patients with right colon cancer. This article reports the early safety results from the trial.

METHODS

This randomised, controlled, phase 3, superiority, trial was done at 17 hospitals in nine provinces of China. Eligible patients were aged 18-75 years with histologically confirmed primary adenocarcinoma located between the caecum and the right third of the transverse colon, without evidence of distant metastases. Central randomisation was done by means of the Clinical Information Management-Central Randomisation System via block randomisation (block size of four). Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to CME or D2 dissection during laparoscopic right colectomy. Central lymph nodes were dissected in the CME but not in the D2 procedure. Neither investigators nor patients were masked to their group assignment but the quality control committee were masked to group assignment. The primary endpoint was 3-year disease-free survival, but the data for this endpoint are not yet mature; thus, only the secondary outcomes-intraoperative surgical complications and postoperative complications within 30 days of surgery, graded according to the Clavien-Dindo classification, mortality (death from any cause within 30 days of surgery), and central lymph node metastasis rate in the CME group only-are reported in this Article. This early analysis of safety was preplanned. The outcomes were analysed according to a modified intention-to-treat principle (excluding patients who no longer met inclusion criteria after surgery or who did not have surgery). This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02619942. Study recruitment is complete, and follow-up is ongoing.

FINDINGS

Between Jan 11, 2016, and Dec 26, 2019, 1072 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned. After exclusion of 77 patients, 995 patients were included in the modified intention-to-treat population (495 in the CME group and 500 in the D2 dissection group). The postoperative surgical complication rate was 20% (97 of 495 patients) in the CME group versus 22% (109 of 500 patients) in the D2 group (difference, -2·2% [95% CI -7·2 to 2·8]; p=0·39); the frequency of Clavien-Dindo grade I-II complications were similar between groups (91 [18%] vs 92 [18%], difference, -0·0% [95% CI -4·8 to 4·8]; p=1·0) but Clavien-Dindo grade III-IV complications were significantly less frequent in the CME group than in the D2 group (six [1%] vs 17 [3%], -2·2% [-4·1 to -0·3]; p=0·022); no deaths occurred in either group. Of the intraoperative complications, vascular injury was significantly more common in the CME group than in the D2 group (15 [3%] vs six [1%], difference, 1·8 [95% CI 0·04 to 3·6]; p=0·045). Metastases in the central lymph nodes were detected in 13 (3%) of 394 patients who underwent central lymph node biopsy in the CME group; no patient had isolated metastases to central lymph nodes.

INTERPRETATION

Although the CME procedure might increase the risk of intraoperative vascular injury, it generally seems to be safe and feasible for experienced surgeons.

FUNDING

The Capital Characteristic Clinical Project of Beijing and the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences.

Fluorescence-guided D3 lymphadenectomy in robotic right colectomy with complete mesocolic excision

BACKGROUND

In robotic right hemicolectomy for cancer, appropriate lymphadenectomy is essential. Visualization of draining lymph nodes and blood flow with near-infrared (NIR) fluorescence DaVinci^® imaging system is a recent development. We present the technique of robotic right colectomy with complete mesocolic excision (CME) and D3 lymphadenectomy using Indocyanine Green (ICG) endoscopic submucosal injection to intraoperatively identify tumour lymphatic basin.

METHODS

The day before surgery, in patients scheduled for robotic right colectomy an endoscopic submucosal injection of 3 mg of ICG solution around the tumor is realized. Robotic right hemicolectomy is performed with suprapubic trocars layout and "bottom to up dissection", realizing a CME with central vessel ligation and D3 lymphadenectomy. Site of primary tumor and lymphatic basin are visible with the FireflyTM camera modality.

RESULTS

From July 2016 to July 2020, 85 patients received a robotic right colectomy with CME and D3 lymphadenectomy. In 50 patients, ICG submucosal injection was performed: visualisation of the site of primary tumour and of LN in the D3 area was possible in all cases; in 17/50 patients (34%), LN out from anatomical lymphatic basin were identified. No side effects were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

In this series, submucosal ICG injection showed to be feasible and safe. The accuracy in identification of D3 lymphatic basin was high, thus permitting an image-guided radical lymphadenectomy. Fluorescent technology represents an interesting innovation to ameliorate surgery of colon cancer.

Robotic Complete Mesocolic Excision (CME) is a safe and feasible option for right colonic cancers: short and midterm results from a single-centre experience

BACKGROUND

Complete mesocolic excision (CME) for right colon cancers has traditionally been an open procedure. Surgical adoption of minimal access CME remains limited due to the technical challenges, training gaps and lack of level-1 data for proven benefits. Currently there is limited published data regarding the clinical results with the use of robotic CME surgery. Aim To report our experience, results and techniques, highlighting a clinical and oncological results and midterm oncological outcomes for robotic CME.

AIM

To report our experience, results and techniques, highlighting a clinical and oncological results and midterm oncological outcomes for robotic CME.

METHODS

All patients undergoing standardised robotic CME technique with SMV first approach between January 2015 and September 2019 were included in this retrospective review of a prospectively collected database. Patient demographics, operative data and clinical and oncological outcomes were recorded.

RESULTS

Seventy-seven robotic CME resections for right colonic cancers were performed over a 4-year period. Median operative time was 180 (128-454) min and perioperative blood loss was 10 (10-50) ml. There were 25 patients who had previous abdominal surgery. Median postoperative hospital stay was 5 (3-18) days. There was no conversion to open surgery in this series. Median lymph node count was 30 (10-60). Three (4%) patients had R1 resection. There was one (1%) local recurrence in stage III disease and 4(5%) distal recurrence in stage II and stage III. There was no 30- or 90-day mortality. Three-year disease-free survival was 100%, 91.7% and 92% for stages I, II and III, respectively. Overall survival was 94%.

CONCLUSIONS

Robotic CME is feasible, effective and safe. Good oncological results and improved survival are seen in this cohort of patients with a standardised approach to robotic CME.

Laparoscopic Colectomy vs Laparoscopic CME: a Retrospective Study of Two Hospitals with Comparable Laparoscopic Experience

PURPOSE

To compare laparoscopic non-CME colectomy with laparoscopic CME colectomy in two hospitals with similar experience in laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

METHODS

Data was collected retrospectively from Päijät-Häme Central Hospital (PHCH, NCME group) and Central Finland Central Hospital (CFCH, CME group) records. Elective laparoscopic resections performed during 2007-2016 for UICC stage I-III adenocarcinoma were included to assess differences in short-term outcome and survival.

RESULTS

There were 340 patients in the NCME group and 325 patients in the CME group. CME delivered longer specimens (p < 0.001), wider resection margins (p < 0.001), and more lymph nodes (p < 0.001) but did not result in better 5-year overall or cancer-specific survival (NCME 77.9% vs CME 72.9%, p = 0.528, NCME 93.2% vs CME 88.9%, p = 0.132, respectively). Thirty-day morbidity, mortality, and length of hospital stay were similar between the groups. Conversion to open surgery was associated with decreased survival.

DISCUSSION

Complete mesocolic excision (CME) is reported to improve survival. Most previous studies have compared open CME with open non-CME (NCME) or open CME with laparoscopic CME. NCME populations have been historical or heterogeneous, potentially causing bias in the interpretation of results. Studies comparing laparoscopic CME with laparoscopic NCME are few and involve only small numbers of patients. In this study, diligently performed laparoscopic non-CME D2 resection delivered disease-free survival results comparable with laparoscopic CME but was not safer.

Laparoscopic Versus Open Complete Mesocolon Excision in Right Colon Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic complete mesocolon excision (LCME) for right colonic cancer improves oncological outcomes. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare intraoperative, postoperative, and oncological outcomes after LCME and open total mesocolon excision (OCME) for right-sided colonic cancers.

METHODS

Literature searches of electronic databases and manual searches up to January 31, 2019, were performed. Random-effects meta-analysis model was used. Review Manager Version 5.3 was used for pooled estimates.

RESULTS

After screening 1334 articles, 10 articles with a total of 2778 patients were eligible for inclusion. Compared to OCME, LCME improves results in terms of overall morbidity (OR = 1.48, 95% CI 1.21 to 1.80, p = 0.0001), blood loss (MD = 56.56, 95% CI 19.05 to 94.06, p = 0.003), hospital stay (MD = 2.18 day, 95% CI 0.54 to 3.83, p = 0.009), and local (OR = 2.12, 95% CI 1.09 to 4.12, p = 0.03) and distant recurrence (OR = 1.63, 95% CI 1.23-2.16, p = 0.0008). There was no significant difference regarding mortality, anastomosis leakage, number of harvested lymph nodes, and 3-year disease-free survival. Open approach was significantly better than laparoscopy in terms of operative time (MD = - 34.76 min, 95% CI - 46.01 to - 23.50, p < 0.00001) and chyle leakage (OR = 0.41, 95% CI 0.18 to 0.96, p = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis suggests that LCME in right colon cancer surgery is superior to OCME in terms of overall morbidity, blood loss, hospital stay, and local and distant recurrence with a moderate grade of recommendation due to the retrospective nature of the included studies.

What factors determine specimen quality in colon cancer surgery? A cohort study

PURPOSE

Tenets of 'good quality' colon cancer surgery include mesocolic plane dissection to preserve an intact mesocolic fascia/peritoneum, and excision of sufficient mesocolon for adequate lymphadenectomy. However, it remains controversial what clinicopathological factors determine 'good quality' surgery, and whether quality of surgery influences morbidity/mortality. This study documents the quality of colon cancer surgery at a quaternary referral centre and identifies factors that influence quality of surgery and post-operative outcomes.

METHODS

Consecutive patients who underwent resection for colon adenocarcinoma at St. James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK (2015-2017), were included. Primary outcome measures included (i) plane of mesocolic dissection, prospectively assessed; and (ii) tissue morphometry (area of mesentery and vascular pedicle length). Other histopathological data were extracted from a prospective database. Clinical data were obtained from the National Bowel Cancer Audit and individual records.

RESULTS

Four hundred five patients were included (mean 69.6 years). The majority (67.4%) of specimens were mesocolic plane dissections. Median area of mesentery excised was 12,085.4 mm². Median vascular pedicle length was 89.3 mm. Post-operative complication was recorded in one-third of patients. Mesocolic plane excision was associated with open surgery (OR 1.80, 95% CI 1.05-3.09), especially in emergency colectomy. Open resections also had a greater mesentery excised (P = 0.002), but incurred more post-operative complication (OR 2.11, 95% CI 1.12-3.99). Post-operative complication was not associated with plane of excision or tissue morphometry.

CONCLUSION

Majority of resections were 'optimal' mesocolic plane dissections. Open resections yielded better quality specimens, but incurred more morbidity. There is room for improvement in the quality of laparoscopic colon cancer surgery, particularly those performed as emergency.

Right Colectomy with Extended D3 Mesenterectomy: Anterior and Posterior to the Mesenteric Vessels

BACKGROUND

In right colectomy for cancer, complete mesocolic excision and D3 lymphadenectomy each leave behind lymphatic tissue anterior and posterior to the superior mesenteric vein (SMV) and artery (SMA). In this article, we present D3 extended mesenterectomy: a surgical technique that excises the lymphatic tissue en bloc with the right colectomy specimen.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A 3D map of the mesentery of the right colon was reconstructed from staging CT-angiogram scans. The surgical technique of right colectomy with D3 extended mesenterectomy consisted of eight steps: 1) reveal the SMV and SMA; 2) isolate the ileocolic artery; 3) isolate the middle colic artery; 4) resolve the anterior mesenteric flap; 5) specimen de-vascularization; 6) colectomy; 7) resolve the posterior mesenteric flap; and 8) anastomosis.

RESULTS

One-hundred-seventy-six patients (77 men) 66 years of age were operated upon from February 2011 to January 2017. There were 169 adenocarcinomas: 16.0% Stage I, 49.1% Stage II, 33.7% Stage III, 1.2% Stage IV. Tumor locations were 50.6% cecum, 41.5% ascending colon, 4.5% hepatic flexure, and 2.3% transverse colon. Mean operating time was 200 minutes, blood loss 273 ml, and length of stay 7.9 days. There were 9 anastomotic leakages and 15 reoperations. One patient underwent small bowel resection due to SMA tear. There was no postoperative mortality. The mean number of lymph nodes per specimen (40.9) was comprised of 27.1 in the D2 volume and 13.8 in the D3 volume. The mean number of metastatic lymph nodes was 1.2 in the D2 volume and 0.13 in D3. There were 7 patients with lymph node metastasis in D3, 2 of whom had node metastasis solely within D3.

CONCLUSION

This study shows that 1.2% of patients would have been incorrectly diagnosed as Stage II if extended D3 mesenterectomy had not been performed. Similarly, lymph node metastases would have been left behind in 4.1% of patients if extended D3 mesenterectomy had not been performed.

Complete mesocolic excision for colon cancer: is it worth it?

Total mesorectal excision (TME) has been the miracle surgical technique which has since allowed the outcomes of rectal cancer to surpass that of colon cancer. Complete mesocolic excision (CME) attempts to adopt the same principles as that of TME and apply it to colon cancer surgery. Initial retrospective case series and comparative studies have shown promising oncological outcomes. CME entails the en bloc removal of a sufficient length of colonic specimen within an intact peritoneal envelop with extended lymphadenectomy through a high central ligation of vessels. This technique, standardizing the method for resection of right sided colon cancer, has witness promising perioperative and oncological data for both open and laparoscopic methods. However, most data available are mostly retrospective with a glaring lack of level 1 evidence. Despite the technique showing similar outcomes to that of conventional colectomy, parts of the procedure put the patient (and surgeon) at risk of potentially catastrophic complications. As promising as the initial results of CME has been, more well-designed randomized control trials are necessary to justify the increased risks taken and effort to mount the learning curve for CME.

Introduction of complete mesocolic excision with central vascular ligation as standardized surgical treatment for colon cancer in Greece. Results of a pilot study and bi-institutional cooperation

INTRODUCTION

Complete mesocolic excision (CME) is generally accepted as state of the art in colon cancer surgery. However, the long-term impact of CME has not been systematically examined. Therefore cohort studies might be a possible way to clarify any differences between conventional resections and CME. Following bilateral cooperation between the Department of Surgery/University Hospital of Erlangen and the 1st Surgical Department of the General Hospital of Nikaia/Piraeus, including teaching activities for introduction of CME, a cohort study was performed, considering surgical quality criteria and clinical outcome.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

All patients with colon carcinomas (CME group, n = 31) referred to the 1st Surgical Department of General Hospital, Nikaia/Piraeus, Greece for surgery from January 2012 to December 2013 were prospectively analyzed and compared with patients who underwent conventional surgery for colon cancer between January 2008 and December 2011 (non-CME group, n = 35). Patients' follow-up was at least 48 months.

RESULTS

There were significantly better results in terms of lymph node yield (CME group: 29.6 vs. non-CME group: 17.85; p < 0.001) and lymph node ratio (LNR) (CME group: 0.12 vs. non-CME group: 0.24; p < 0.001) and recurrence-free survival in favor of the CME group (CME group: n = 0 vs. non-CME group: n = 5) without any increase in surgical morbidity (CME group: n = 6 vs. non-CME group: n = 11; p = 0.10).

CONCLUSIONS

Complete mesocolic excision appears to offer a superior oncological result without any increase of postoperative morbidity and mortality. Furthermore, CME represents a surgical technique which can be established in a surgical department after previous teaching without increasing the postoperative complication rate.

A standardized suprapubic bottom-to-up approach in robotic right colectomy: technical and oncological advances for complete mesocolic excision (CME)

Backround

Several studies have demonstrated a direct correlation between lymph node yield and survival after colectomy for cancer. Complete mesocolic excision (CME) in right colectomy (RC) reduces local recurrence but is technically demanding. Here we report our early single center experience with robotic right colectomy comparing our standardized bottom-to-up (BTU) approach of robotic RC with CME and central vessel ligation (CVL) facilitated by a suprapubic access with the “classical” medial-to-lateral (MTL) strategy.

Methods

A 4-step BTU approach of robotic RC guided by embryonal planes in the process of retrocolic mobilization with suprapubic port placement was performed in the BTU-group (n = 24; all with intention to treat cancer). In step 1 CME was initiated with caudolateral mobilization of the right colon guided by the fascia of Toldt across the duodenum and up to the Trunk of Henle. Subsequently, dissection was performed BTU right of the middle supramesenteric vessels with central ileocolic vessel ligation in step 2. Subsequent to separation of the transverse retromesenteric space and completion of mobilization the hepatic flexure in step 3, the transverse mesocolon was then transected right of the middle colic vessels in step 4. An extracorporeal side to side anastomosis was performed. We compared the outcome of the BTU-group with a MTL-group (n = 7).

Results

Patient characteristics like age, gender, BMI, comorbidity (ASA) and M-status were comparable among groups. There was no conversion. Overall complication rate was 35.5%. We experienced no anastomoses insufficiency, grade Dindo/Clavien III/IV complication or mortality in this study. Type I and II complications and surgical characteristics incl. OR-time, ICU- and hospital-stay were comparable between the two groups. However, the lymph node yield was superior in the BTU-group (mean 40.2 ± 17.1) when compared with the MTL-group (16,3 nodes ±8.5; p <  0,001).

Conclusions

Compared to the classical MTL approach, robotic suprapubic BTU RC changes from a search of the layers bordering the oncological dissection to a consequent utilization of the planes as a retro-mesocolic guide during CME. The BTU strategy could bear the potential to increase the lymph node yield. Robotic systems may provide the technical requirements to combine advantages of both open and minimally invasive RC.

Short- and long-term outcomes of totally robotic versus robotic-assisted right hemicolectomy for colon cancer: A retrospective study

Totally robotic right hemicolectomy (TRRH) is a novel alternative surgical method used for the treatment of colon cancer. The aim of this study was to compare both the short-and long-term outcomes of TRRH and robotic-assisted right hemicolectomy (RARH) for the treatment of colon cancer.We performed a 1:2 matched propensity score analysis. We then retrospectively analyzed all procedures (64 cases TRRH and 128 cases RARH) carried out by a single surgeon between December 4, 2014 and June 20, 2018 at a large center. Both short-and long-term surgical outcomes were compared between 2 different groups.Based on the propensity score matching, we selected 64 patients that had undergone TRRH treatment and 128 patients who had undergone RARH treatment. The preoperative clinical-pathological characteristics were well matched between the 2 groups. We observed no significant differences between the 2 groups in postoperative pathological outcomes. The mean operative time was found to be significantly longer in the TRRH group compared to the RARH group (168.2 ± 9.1 minutes vs 153.4 ± 7.4 minutes, P = .034). The mean operative incision length was found to be significantly longer in the TRRH group than in the RARH group (4.5 ± 0.6 cm vs 6.9 ± 1.1 cm, P = .023). Postoperative pain score (visual analog scale at day 1) was found to be significantly lower in the TRRH group than in the RARH group (2.9 ± 1.3 vs 4.1 ± 2.1, P = .005). The time to pass flatus was observed to be statistically lower in the TRRH group (P = .042). We observed 3 twists of mesentery in the RARH group, while none were observed in the TRRH group (P < .050). Both the 3-year overall survival (TRRH [91.6%] vs RARH [89.2%], P = .467) and the 3-year disease-free survival (TRRH [81.4%] vs RARH [78.2%], P = .551) were determined to be comparable between the 2 groups studied here.We show that TRRH is a safe and feasible treatment option for colon cancer patients in terms of both short- and long-term outcomes. High-volume, randomized, controlled trials with sufficient follow-up studies will need to be carried out in order to confirm this rationale.

Recurrence and cancer-specific death after adjuvant chemotherapy for Stage III colon cancer

AIM

The recommended standard of care for patients after resection of Stage III colon cancer is adjuvant 5-fluorouracil based chemotherapy - FOLFOX (fluorouracil, leucovorin with oxaliplatin) - or CAPOX (capecitabine, oxaliplatin). This may be modified in older patients or depending on comorbidity. This has been challenged recently as the apparent benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy may arise from improvements in surgery or preoperative imaging or pathology staging. This study compares recurrence and colon-cancer-specific death between patients who received postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy and those who did not.

METHOD

Prospectively recorded data from 363 consecutive patients who had a resection for Stage III colonic adenocarcinoma between 1995 and 2010 inclusive were analysed. Surviving patients were followed for at least 5 years. The suitability of patients for chemotherapy was discussed routinely at multidisciplinary team meetings. The incidence of recurrence and colon-cancer-specific death was evaluated by competing risk methods.

RESULTS

After adjustment for the competing risk of non-colorectal cancer death, there was no significant difference in recurrence between the 204 patients who received chemotherapy and the 159 who did not [hazard ratio (HR) 0.94, 95% CI 0.66-1.32, P = 0.700) and no significant difference in colon-cancer-specific death (HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.50-1.04, P = 0.084; HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.57-1.36, P = 0.577 after adjustment for relevant covariates).

CONCLUSION

These findings question the routine use of chemotherapy after complete mesocolic excision for Stage III colon cancer. Recurrence and cancer-specific death, assessed by competing risk methods, should be the standard outcomes for evaluating the effectiveness of adjuvant chemotherapy after potentially curative resection.

Comparison between conventional colectomy and complete mesocolic excision for colon cancer: a systematic review and pooled analysis : A review of CME versus conventional colectomies

BACKGROUND

Complete mesocolic excision (CME) is advocated based on oncologic superiority, but not commonly performed in North America. Many data are case series with few comparative studies. Our aim was to perform a systematic review comparing outcomes between CME and non-CME colectomy.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed according to PRISMA guidelines of MEDLINE, EMBASE, HealthStar, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library. Studies were included if they compared conventional resection (non-CME) to CME for colon cancer. Quality was assessed using methodological index for non-randomized studies (MINORS). The main outcome measures were short-term morbidity and oncologic outcomes. Weighted pooled means and proportions with 95% CI were calculated using a random-effects model when appropriate.

RESULTS

Out of 825 unique citations, 23 studies underwent full-text reviews and 14 met inclusion criteria. Mean MINORS score was 13.3 (range 11-15). The mean sample size in CME group was 1166 (range 45-3756) and 945 (range 40-3425) in non-CME. Four papers reported plane of dissection, with CME plane achieved in 85.8% (95% CI 79.8-91.7). Mean OR time in CME group was 167 min (163-171) and 138 min (135-142) in conventional group. Perioperative morbidity was reported in six studies, with pooled overall complications of 22.5% (95% CI 18.4-26.6) for CME and 19.6 (95% CI 13.6-25.5) for non-CME. Anastomotic leak occurred in 6.0% (95% CI 2.2-9.7) of CME resections versus 6.0% (95% CI 4.1-7.9) in non-CME. CME had more lymph nodes, longer distance to high tie, and specimen length in all studies. Nine studies compared long-term oncologic outcomes and only three reported statistically significant higher disease-free or overall survival in favor of CME. Local recurrence was lower after CME in two of four studies.

CONCLUSIONS

The quality of evidence is limited and does not consistently support the superiority of CME. Better data are needed before CME can be recommended as the standard of care for colon cancer resections.

D2 VS D3 LYMPH NODE DISSECTION FOR RIGHT COLON CANCER (review)

Collapse

Risk Factors for Complications following Introduction of Radical Surgery for Colon Cancer: A Consecutive Patient Series

BACKGROUND

Rectal cancer surgery is standardized, resulting in improved survival. Colon cancer has fallen behind and therefore more radical surgical techniques have been introduced. One technique is complete mesocolic excision. The aim of this article was to study the complications after the introduction of standardized complete mesocolic excision in a single center.

METHODS

Complete mesocolic excision was introduced in 2007, and data were collected from 286 patients prior to surgery (2007-2010). The surgeon decided on open or laparoscopic surgery. Follow-up information was recorded until 31 December 2015. Complications were classified according to a modified Clavien-Dindo classification.

RESULTS

Complications occurred in 47%, severe complications (grade III and IV) in 15%. In-hospital mortality was 3.5%. A total of 142 patients (49.7%) were operated by open surgery. Logistic regression revealed anemia (p = 0.001), open surgery (p < 0.001), and long operating time (p < 0.001) as significant factors for complications in general. Multinomial logistic regression revealed that severe complications occurred more often in males (odds ratio: 2.56; 95% confidence interval: 0.98-6.68), patients with anemia (odds ratio: 3.49; 95% confidence interval: 1.27-9.60), elevated body mass index (odds ratio: 1.14; 95% confidence interval: 1.02-1.28), and in open surgery (odds ratio: 9.95; 95% confidence interval: 2.58-38.35). Age was not associated with severe complications. Survival was not significantly influenced by complications. Overall survival (5 years) was 90% among patients with complications and 92% among those without complications.

CONCLUSION

Severe complications following the introduction of complete mesocolic excision are patient dependent and related to open surgery. Patients selected for laparoscopy had less number of complications; therefore, introducing complete mesocolic excision by laparoscopy is justified. Identification of these factors can improve selection of appropriate surgical approach and postoperative patient safety.

"Top down no-touch" technique in robotic complete mesocolic excision for extended right hemicolectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis

BACKGROUND

Proper identification of the mesocolic vessels is essential for achieving complete mesocolic excision (CME) in cases of colon cancer requiring an extended right hemicolectomy. In robotic procedures, we employed a "top down technique" to allow early identification of the gastrocolic trunk and middle colic vessels. The aim of our study was to illustrate the details of this technique in a series of 12 patients.

METHODS

The top down technique consists of two steps. First, the omental bursa was entered to identify the right gastroepiploic vein. Tracing down this vein as a landmark, the gastrocolic trunk was exposed, branches of this trunk and the middle colic vessels were divided. Second, dissection was directed to the ileocolic region and proceeded in an inferior-to-superior direction along the superior mesenteric vein to divide the ileocolic and right colic vessels consecutively. The ileotranverse anastomosis was created intracorporeally.

RESULTS

There were 8 males and 4 females with a mean age of 64.8 ± 16.9 years and a mean body mass index of 25.6 ± 3.7 kg/m². All the procedures were completed successfully. No conversions occurred. The mean operative time and blood loss were 312.1 ± 93.9 min and 110.0 ± 89.9 ml, respectively. The mean number of harvested lymph nodes was 45.2 ± 11.1. The mean length of hospital stay was 7.6 ± 4.7 days. Two patients had intraoperative complications and two had postoperative complications. There was no disease recurrence at a mean follow-up period of 10.4 ± 7.1 months.

CONCLUSIONS

The top down technique appears to be useful in robotic CME for an extended right hemicolectomy. Early identification of the gastrocolic trunk and middle colic vessels via this technique may prevent inadvertent vascular injury at the mesenteric root of the transverse colon.

Oncological outcomes of complete versus conventional mesocolic excision in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy

BACKGROUND

Complete mesocolic excision (CME) has been proposed for colon cancer to improve oncological outcomes. The risks and benefits of laparoscopic CME have not been examined fully. We compared short- and long-term outcomes of CME with a conventional mesocolic excision (non-CME) in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy (RHC) for right-sided colon cancer.

METHODS

In total, 115 patients who underwent laparoscopic RHC with stage I-III right-sided colon cancer at Busan Paik Hospital from August 2007 to October 2011 were enrolled in this case-control study. Three trained colorectal surgeons reviewed videos of the surgeries; patients were divided into two groups: those who underwent a CME (CME group, n = 34) and those who underwent a conventional mesocolic excision (non-CME group, n = 81).

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between the CME and non-CME groups in operative time, post-operative complications, or hospital stay. However, the CME group had more lymph nodes harvested (P < 0.001) and lower blood loss (P = 0.016) versus the non-CME group. There was no difference in 5-year disease-free survival rate between the groups, but 5-year overall survival rate was 100% in the CME group and 89.49% in the non-CME group (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic RHC with CME is safe and associated with better 5-year overall survival rate than non-CME for patients with stage I-III right-sided colon cancer. Implementation of CME surgery might improve oncological outcomes for patients with right-sided colon cancer.

Variations of Gastrocolic Trunk of Henle and Its Significance in Gastrocolic Surgery

Due to the increasing incidence of gastrointestinal (GI) tumors, more and more importance is attached to radical resection and patients' survival, which requires adequate extent of resection and radical lymph node dissection. Blood vessels around the gastrointestinal tract, as anatomical landmarks for tumor resection and lymph node dissection, play a key role in the successful surgery and curative treatment of gastrointestinal tumors. In the isolation of subpyloric area or hepatic flexure of the colon for gastrectomy or right hemicolectomy, lymph node dissection and ligation are often performed at the head of the pancreas and superior mesenteric vein, during which even a minor inadvertent error may lead to unwanted bleeding. Among these blood vessels, the venous system composed of Henle's trunk and its tributaries is the most complex, which has a direct influence on the outcome and postoperative recovery of the patients. There are many variations of Henle's trunk, with complicated courses and various locations, attracting more and more researchers to study it and tried to analyze the influence of its variations on gastrointestinal surgeries. We characterized various variants and tributaries of Henle's trunk using autopsy, vascular casting, 3D CT reconstruction, intraoperative anatomy, and Hisense CAS system and summarized and analyzed the tributaries of Henle's trunk, to determine its influence on GI surgeries.

Robotics confers an advantage in right hemicolectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis when matched against conventional laparoscopy

Comparisons between robotic and laparoscopic right hemicolectomy have been confounded by variations in operative technique. This study evaluates the two procedures after standardizing the intraoperative steps and perioperative management. Patients who underwent robotic right hemicolectomy with intracorporeal bowel anastomosis between July 2015 and June 2017 were matched with a laparoscopic group. Perioperative management was in accordance to an enhanced recovery protocol. Outcomes and histopathological data were compared. Thirty-two patients were included. Amongst the patients who did not undergo complete mesocolic excision, the median operative time did not differ between the two groups (p = 0.413). The robotic group recorded a statistically shorter time for intracorporeal anastomosis (13 vs 19 min, p = 0.024). Postoperative recovery and complication rates were similar, except for a greater lymph node harvest in the robotic group (41 vs 31, p = 0.038). Robotic surgery achieves short-term results comparable to existing conventional laparoscopy, notwithstanding the advantages of enhanced ergonomics.