International Consensus Statement on Obstructive Sleep Apnea

BACKGROUND

Evaluation and interpretation of the literature on obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) allows for consolidation and determination of the key factors important for clinical management of the adult OSA patient. Toward this goal, an international collaborative of multidisciplinary experts in sleep apnea evaluation and treatment have produced the International Consensus statement on Obstructive Sleep Apnea (ICS:OSA).

METHODS

Using previously defined methodology, focal topics in OSA were assigned as literature review (LR), evidence-based review (EBR), or evidence-based review with recommendations (EBR-R) formats. Each topic incorporated the available and relevant evidence which was summarized and graded on study quality. Each topic and section underwent iterative review and the ICS:OSA was created and reviewed by all authors for consensus.

RESULTS

The ICS:OSA addresses OSA syndrome definitions, pathophysiology, epidemiology, risk factors for disease, screening methods, diagnostic testing types, multiple treatment modalities, and effects of OSA treatment on multiple OSA-associated comorbidities. Specific focus on outcomes with positive airway pressure (PAP) and surgical treatments were evaluated.

CONCLUSION

This review of the literature consolidates the available knowledge and identifies the limitations of the current evidence on OSA. This effort aims to create a resource for OSA evidence-based practice and identify future research needs. Knowledge gaps and research opportunities include improving the metrics of OSA disease, determining the optimal OSA screening paradigms, developing strategies for PAP adherence and longitudinal care, enhancing selection of PAP alternatives and surgery, understanding health risk outcomes, and translating evidence into individualized approaches to therapy.

Predictors and consequences of residual apnea during positive airway pressure therapy

STUDY OBJECTIVES

Determine the risk factors for, and consequences of, residual apnea during long-term positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA).

METHODS

A prospective cohort study of 195 subjects after a split-night polysomnogram. Estimation of residual respiratory events on PAP were done by both automated and manual scoring of data in EncoreAnywhere™. Clinical and polysomnographic predictors of residual apnea were estimated.

RESULTS

There were 166 and 101 patients still on PAP at the 3 and 12 months, respectively. Seventy four (44.6%) and 46 (45.5%) had a residual scored respiratory event index-flow (sREI_FLOW) ≥ 15/hour of use and 46 (45.5%) at the 3rd and 12th month, respectively. Treatment phase central apnea hypopnea index (TCAHI), a surrogate of high loop gain, was the main predictor for residual sREI_FLOW (β = 0.345, p: 0.025) at the 3rd and 12th month (β = 0.147, p: 0.020). TCAHI also predicted unstable breathing (U) %. The body mass index (hazard ratio [HR] 1.034, 95% CI 1.008-1.062, p: 0.012) and effective sREI_FLOW>15/hour in the first month (HR 2.477, 95% CI 1.510-4.065, p < 0.001) were the key predictors for drop out of PAP use at the 12th month. Effective sREI_FLOW>15/hour in the first month was also a predictor for median usage duration >4 h for 70% of the night at both the 3rd month (odds ratio [OR] 0.947, 95% CI 0.909-0.986, p: 0.008) and 12th month (OR 0.973, 95% CI 0.951-0.994, p: 0.014).

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment-phase CAHI predicts long-term residual apnea on PAP. High residual disease adversely impacts adherence.

Are We Underestimating the Central Components of the Mixed Apneas?-A Hypothesis for Revised Scoring

PURPOSE

Apneas are classified in three categories, as obstructive, central, and mixed types. Mixed apneas are calculated together with the obstructive events in diagnosing obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (SAS). The clinical significance of mixed apneas needs to be specified.

METHODS

Patients with obstructive SAS having an index of mixed apneas ≥5/hour were evaluated. A new approach was developed to score the mixed apneas, and calculated them together with either obstructive or central type of events, depending on their obstructive and central components. The relationship between the development of complex SAS and the indices of abnormal respiratory events per standard and revised scoring was evaluated.

RESULTS

Ten of 56 patients (17.9%) developed complex SAS at titration polysomnography. The mean index of mixed apneas per standard scoring was significantly higher in patients who did not develop complex SAS ( P = 0.006). The use of newly developed method in scoring mixed apneas resulted that three patients (5.4%) fulfilled the diagnostic criteria for the central SAS at first-night polysomnography ( P < 0.001), and all of them had developed complex SAS at titration night requiring other modes of positive airway pressure therapy than the continuous mode ( P = 0.004). Curve estimation models showed that the change from mixed apneas to central apneas was highly significant in patients developing complex SAS ( r2 = 0.501; P = 0.022).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study showed that the summation of mixed apneas with the obstructive events conventionally underestimates the central components and the diagnosis of central SAS, which are fundamental in the risk stratification of complex SAS.

Practice recommendations for the role of physiotherapy in the management of sleep disorders: the 2022 Brazilian Sleep Association Guidelines

This clinical guideline supported by the Brazilian Sleep Association comprises a brief history of the development of Brazilian sleep physiotherapy, outlines the role of the physiotherapist as part of a sleep health team, and describes the clinical guidelines in respect of the management of some sleep disorders by the physiotherapist (including sleep breathing disorders, i.e., obstructive sleep apnea, central sleep apnea, upper airway resistance syndrome, hypoventilation syndromes and overlap syndrome, and pediatric sleep breathing disorders; sleep bruxism; circadian rhythms disturbances; insomnia; and Willis-Ekbom disease/periodic limb movement disorder. This clinical practice guideline reflects the state of the art at the time of publication and will be reviewed and updated as new information becomes available.

[Treatment-Emergent Central Sleep Apnea - Detection and Treatment]

Treatment-Emergent Central Sleep Apnea - Detection and Treatment Abstract. In treatment-emergent central sleep apnea (TECSA), affected patients with obstructive sleep apnea newly develop central sleep apnea (AHI central ≥5/h) under therapy with positive pressure ventilation which cannot be explained by other causes. The pathophysiology of TECSA is incompletely understood. PaCO2 and the associated apnea threshold seem to play a central role. The incidence of TECSA varies (1.8-20%), and in about 2/3 of cases it is self-limiting in the course of the therapy. If persistence or new onset occurs later in the course of positive pressure therapy, a further evaluation (e.g., echocardiography, neurologic examination, medication history) is indicated. Effective treatment options include a change in ventilation therapy (adaptive servoventilation or bilevel ventilation with back-up frequency) or additional nocturnal oxygen supplementation; these options should be decided case by case.

Residual excessive daytime sleepiness in patients treated for obstructive sleep apnea: guidance for assessment, diagnosis, and management

Excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) affects approximately half of patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and can persist in some despite normalization of breathing, oxygenation, and sleep quality with primary OSA therapy, such as continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). EDS is often overlooked and under discussed in the primary care setting and in the follow-up of CPAP-treated patients due to difficult assessment of such a multi-dimensional symptom. This review aims to provide suggestions for procedures that can be implemented into routine clinical practice to identify, evaluate, and manage EDS in patients treated for OSA, including how to appropriately use various self-report and objective assessments along the clinical pathway and options for pharmacotherapy. In addition, examples of when it is appropriate to refer a patient to a sleep specialist for evaluation are discussed.

Treatment-emergent central sleep apnea: a unique sleep-disordered breathing

Treatment-emergent central sleep apnea (TECSA) is a specific form of sleep-disordered breathing, characterized by the emergence or persistence of central apneas during treatment for obstructive sleep apnea. The purpose of this review was to summarize the definition, epidemiology, potential mechanisms, clinical characteristics, and treatment of TECSA. We searched for relevant articles up to January 31, 2020, in the PubMed database. The prevalence of TECSA varied widely in different studies. The potential mechanisms leading to TECSA included ventilatory control instability, low arousal threshold, activation of lung stretch receptors, and prolonged circulation time. TECSA may be a self-limited disorder in some patients and could be resolved spontaneously over time with ongoing treatment of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). However, central apneas persist even with the regular CPAP therapy in some patients, and new treatment approaches such as adaptive servo-ventilation may be necessary. We concluded that several questions regarding TECSA remain, despite the findings of many studies, and it is necessary to carry out large surveys with basic scientific design and clinical trials for TECSA to clarify these irregularities. Further, it will be vital to evaluate the baseline demographic and polysomnographic data of TECSA patients more carefully and comprehensively.

Treatment-Emergent Central Apnea: Physiologic Mechanisms Informing Clinical Practice

The purpose of this review was to describe our management approach to patients with treatment-emergent central sleep apnea (TECSA). The emergence of central sleep apnea during positive airway pressure therapy occurs in approximately 8% of titration studies for OSA, and it has been associated with several demographic, clinical, and polysomnographic factors, as well as factors related to the titration study itself. TECSA shares similar pathophysiology with central sleep apnea. In fact, central and OSA pathophysiologic mechanisms are inextricably intertwined, with ventilatory instability and upper airway narrowing occurring in both entities. TECSA is a "dynamic" process, with spontaneous resolution with ongoing positive airway pressure therapy in most patients, persistence in some, or appearing de novo in a minority of patients. Management strategy for TECSA aims to eliminate abnormal respiratory events, stabilize sleep architecture, and improve the underlying contributing medical comorbidities. CPAP therapy remains a standard therapy for TECSA. Expectant management is appropriate given its transient nature in most cases, whereas select patients would benefit from an early switch to an alternative positive airway pressure modality. Other treatment options include supplemental oxygen and pharmacologic therapy.

Adherence to Positive Airway Therapy After Switching From CPAP to ASV: A Big Data Analysis

STUDY OBJECTIVES

There is a lack of data regarding adherence trajectories when switching from continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) to adaptive servoventilation (ASV) in the context of persistent or treatment-emergent central sleep apnea (CSA). This study investigated 90-day adherence rates in patients with sleep apnea based on the type of positive airway pressure (PAP) device used and any switching of PAP modality over time.

METHODS

Telemonitoring data were obtained from a United States PAP database. Eligible patients were a 30% random sample who started PAP, plus all who started ASV, from January 1, 2015 to October 2, 2015. All received PAP and had at least one session with usage of 1 hour or more. Adherence and device usage were determined in three groups: started on CPAP and stayed on CPAP (CPAP only); started on ASV and stayed on ASV (ASV only); started on CPAP, switched to ASV (Switch). The United States Medicare definition of adherence was used.

RESULTS

The study included 198,890 patients; 189,724 (CPAP only), 8,957 (ASV only) and 209 (Switch). In the Switch group, average apnea-hypopnea index decreased significantly on ASV versus CPAP. At 90 days, adherence rates were 73.8% and 73.2% in the CPAP only and ASV only groups. In the Switch group, CPAP adherence was 62.7%, improving to 76.6% after the switch to ASV. Mean device usage at 90 days was 5.27, 5.31, and 5.73 h/d in the CPAP only, ASV only, and Switch groups, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment-emergent or persistent CSA during CPAP reduced therapy adherence, but adherence improved early after switching from CPAP to ASV.