Switching STudy of Kidney TRansplant PAtients with Tremor to LCP-TacrO (STRATO): an open-label, multicenter, prospective phase 3b study

Conversion From Immediate-Release to Prolonged-Release Tacrolimus in Kidney Transplant Patients With Tremor: A Case Series Study

BACKGROUND/AIM

Tremor is common with tacrolimus treatment and is linked with peak blood drug concentrations. We investigated the effect of switching from immediate-release tacrolimus (IR-TAC) to MeltDose prolonged-release tacrolimus (LCPT) on tremor in kidney transplant recipients experiencing tremor at therapeutic levels of IR-TAC.

METHODS

The Activities of Daily Living Subscale (ADL, range 0-48, lower = better) of the Essential Tremor Rating Scale was used to assess the effect of therapy change on speech, occupational impairment and social activities over a 12-month follow-up period.

RESULTS

The study included 18 patients (mean age = 45.6 y, range 26-73; median (IQR) time from transplant = 1.1 y (0.6-1.5), with baseline IR-TAC trough concentrations (C0) ranging from 4.2 to 9.4 ng/mL (mean C0 = 6.7 ± 1.3 ng/mL). After the switch to LCPT, the mean ADL score improved from baseline 11.2 to 8.4 after 7 to 14 days (an 18% improvement, P < .001). This improvement was sustained after 3 months (ADL score = 5.0, 46% improvement vs baseline), 6 months (ADL score = 4.4, 48% improvement vs baseline), and 12 months (ADL score = 3.6, 63% improvement vs baseline); all P < .001. Despite a 40% reduction in LCPT daily doses (mean -1.9 mg/day compared to IR-TAC), the achieved C0 was constant during the course of the 12-month observation (P = .755). The renal function remained stable after conversion (eGFR 12 months vs baseline = +1.1 mL/min/1.73 m2, 95% CI: -5.6 to +7.9).

CONCLUSION

Conversion to LCPT may alleviate symptom burden and improve daily activities in kidney transplant recipients experiencing tremor within therapeutic IR-TAC concentrations.

Impact of Switching From Immediate- or Prolonged-Release to Once-Daily Extended-Release Tacrolimus (LCPT) on Tremor in Stable Kidney Transplant Recipients: The Observational ELIT Study

Once-daily extended-release tacrolimus (LCPT) exhibits increased bioavailability versus immediate-release (IR-TAC) and prolonged release (PR-TAC) tacrolimus. Improvements in tremor were previously reported in a limited number of kidney transplant patients who switched to LCPT. We conducted a non-interventional, non-randomized, uncontrolled, longitudinal, prospective, multicenter study to assess the impact of switching to LCPT on tremor and quality of life (QoL) in a larger population of stable kidney transplant patients. The primary endpoint was change in The Essential Tremor Rating Assessment Scale (TETRAS) score; secondary endpoints included 12-item Short Form Survey (SF-12) scores, tacrolimus trough concentrations, neurologic symptoms, and safety assessments. Subgroup analyses were conducted to assess change in TETRAS score and tacrolimus trough concentration/dose (C0/D) ratio by prior tacrolimus formulation and tacrolimus metabolizer status. Among 221 patients, the mean decrease of TETRAS score after switch to LCPT was statistically significant (p < 0.0001 vs. baseline). There was no statistically significant difference in change in TETRAS score after switch to LCPT between patients who had received IR-TAC and those who had received PR-TAC before switch, or between fast and slow metabolizers of tacrolimus. The overall increase of C0/D ratio post-switch to LCPT was statistically significant (p < 0.0001) and from baseline to either M1 or M3 (both p < 0.0001) in the mITT population and in all subgroups. In the fast metabolizers group, the C0/D ratio crossed over the threshold of 1.05 ng/mL/mg after the switch to LCPT. Other neurologic symptoms tended to improve, and the SF-12 mental component summary score improved significantly. No new safety concerns were evident. In this observational study, all patients had a significant improvement of tremor, QoL and C0/D ratio post-switch to LCPT irrespective of the previous tacrolimus formulation administered (IR-TAC or PR-TAC) and irrespective from their metabolism status (fast or slow metabolizers).

Use of LCP-Tacrolimus (LCPT) in Kidney Transplantation: A Delphi Consensus Survey of Expert Clinicians

BACKGROUND LCPT (Envarsus XR®) is a common once-daily, extended-release oral tacrolimus formulation used in kidney transplantation. However, there are minimal evidence-based recommendations regarding optimal dosing and treatment in the de novo and conversion settings. MATERIAL AND METHODS Using Delphi methodology, 12 kidney transplantation experts with LCPT experience reviewed available data to determine potential consensus topics. Key statements regarding LCPT use were generated and disseminated to the panel in an online Delphi survey. Statements were either accepted, revised, or rejected based on the level of consensus, perceived strength of evidence, and alignment with clinical practice. Consensus was defined a priori as ≥75% agreement. RESULTS Twenty-three statements were generated: 14 focused on de novo LCPT use and 9 on general administration or LCPT conversion use. After 2 rounds, consensus was achieved for 11/14 of the former and 7/9 of the latter statements. In a de novo setting, LCPT was recognized as a first-line option based on its safety and efficacy compared to immediate-release tacrolimus. In particular, African Americans and rapid metabolizer populations were identified as preferred for first-line LCPT therapy. In a conversion setting, full consensus was achieved for converting to LCPT to address neurological adverse effects related to immediate-release tacrolimus and for the time required (approximately 7 days) for steady-state LCPT trough levels to be reached. CONCLUSIONS When randomized clinical trials do not replicate current utilization patterns, the Delphi process can successfully generate consensus statements by expert clinicians to inform clinical decision-making for the use of LCPT in kidney transplant recipients.

Pharmacokinetics of Envarsus in pediatric kidney transplant recipients - phase 1 pilot conversion study

INTRODUCTION

Tacrolimus is the standard immunosuppressant for pediatric kidney transplants and is routinely administered twice daily (BD-tac). Envarsus (LCP-tac), an extended-release formulation, is approved for adults but not for pediatric patients.

METHODS

We conducted a pilot open-label phase 1 study in stable pediatric kidney transplant recipients (age < 18 at the time of study). Our primary objective was to compare the pharmacokinetics (Pk) of LCP-tac versus BD-tac. We conducted two 24-h Pk studies: pre-conversion (BD-tac) and 4 weeks post-conversion to LCP-tac. Patients were followed for 6 months, with the option to continue LCP-tac.

RESULTS

Five patients completed the study, with no returns to BD-tac. Median age was 15 years (range 11-17). LCP-tac exhibited an extended-release profile versus the bimodal profile of BD-tac. Time to maximum concentration was delayed (5 h vs. 1 h), and maximum concentration was lower (9.9 ng/mL vs. 14.4 ng/mL). Tacrolimus area under the curve (24 h) was comparable (141 ± 46.5 ng/mL vs. 164 ± 27.8 ng/mL). No new safety concerns arose. There were no rejection and no difference in eGFR at the study's end (1.5 mL/min/1.73 m2 , range - 1.7 to 2.3 mL/min/1.73 m2 ). Concentration/dose ratio was higher in LCP-tac (1.8 ± 0.64 vs. 0.8 ± 0.39). The final conversion ratio was 0.6 (BD-tac: LCP-tac).

CONCLUSION

Our pilot study confirms the extended-release Pk profile and improved absorption of LCP-tac compared to BD-tac. A larger study is needed to further evaluate the population Pk characteristics in children.

Early outcomes associated with de novo once-daily extended-release versus twice-daily immediate-release tacrolimus in a predominantly African American kidney transplant population: A single-center observational study

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this study was to compare early outcomes of de novo LCPT (once-daily extended-release tacrolimus) to IR TAC (twice-daily immediate-release tacrolimus) in a predominantly African American (AA) adult kidney transplant population.

METHODS

This is a single center, retrospective cohort study. Patients were divided into two cohorts: IR TAC (administered between January 1, 2017, and January 31, 2019) and LCPT (administered between February 1, 2019, and May 31, 2020). Primary endpoints were changes in tacrolimus trough levels (ng/mL) and estimated glomerular filtration rate up to 12 months post-transplantation. Clinical endpoints included graft survival, delayed graft function, biopsy-proven rejection, CMV viremia, and BK. A propensity score weighted generalized linear mixed effects model was used for analysis.

RESULTS

The rate of change in tacrolimus levels was significantly higher in the LCPT cohort compared to the IR TAC cohort at 14 days post-discharge (.2455 ng/mL per day vs. .1073 ng/mL, respectively; p < .001). Subsequently, the LCPT cohort had a slightly higher rate of decline (-.015 ng/mL per day vs. -.010 ng/mL with IR TAC; p = .0894) up to 12 months post-discharge. Although eGFR was similar between the two cohorts at 12 months post-transplant, the rate of increase was slower in the LCPT cohort (.1371 mL/min per day vs. .1852 mL/min per day, p = .0314). No significant differences were found in graft survival, DGF, BPAR, CMV, or BK infection.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that despite higher early trough levels with immediate post-transplant LCPT use, clinical outcomes are comparable to IR TAC at one-year post-transplant. Notably, LCPT use does not increase the incidence of DGF and that this formulation of CNI can be used as first line therapy post-transplant.

Extended-release tacrolimus dosing and outcomes in pediatric and young adult transplant recipients - A single-center experience

BACKGROUND

Published data on LCP-tacrolimus (LCPT) in the pediatric population are limited.

METHODS

This single-center, retrospective, observational study describes LCPT doses needed to reach therapeutic ranges in pediatric and young adult kidney and liver transplant recipients in both de novo usage and conversion from immediate-release tacrolimus (IR-Tac). Adverse outcomes up to 12 months after LCPT initiation were also evaluated.

RESULTS

Forty-one transplant recipients (30 kidney, 11 liver) were included. The median initial doses of LCPT were 0.034 mg/kg (IQR 0.019) de novo and 0.09 mg/kg (IQR = 0.076) converted. The median doses at first therapeutic level were 0.086 mg/kg (IQR 0.028) de novo and 0.1 mg/kg (IQR 0.066) converted. The median LCPT:IR-Tac conversion ratio initially was 0.7 and 0.75 at therapeutic levels. The rate of AKI per 100 days of exposure to IR-Tac was 0.546 and 0.439 on LCPT. The percentage of patients with rejection was not different before and after conversion (clinical rejection 8.6% [n = 3] vs 11.4% [n = 4], p = .6; biopsy-proven rejection 2.9% [n = 1] vs 11.4% [n = 4], p = .11). One patient had graft loss unrelated to rejection, and the graft was explanted.

CONCLUSION

In this study, pediatric and young adult abdominal transplant recipients had therapeutic tacrolimus levels at LCPT doses below the adult-labeled dose; the conversion ratio from IR-Tac to LCPT at therapeutic level was similar. There were no identified safety concerns in de novo or converted LCPT use in pediatric and young adult patients.

Tacrolimus versus mycophenolate for AutoImmune hepatitis patients with incompLete response On first-line therapy (TAILOR study): a study protocol for a phase III, open-label, multicentre, randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a rare, chronic inflammatory disease of the liver. The treatment goal is reaching complete biochemical response (CR), defined as the normalisation of aspartate and alanine aminotransferases and immunoglobulin gamma. Ongoing AIH activity can lead to fibrosis and (decompensated) cirrhosis. Incomplete biochemical response is the most important risk factor for liver transplantation or liver-related mortality. First-line treatment consists of a combination of azathioprine and prednisolone. If CR is not reached, tacrolimus (TAC) or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) can be used as second-line therapy. Both products are registered for the prevention of graft rejection in solid organ transplant recipients. The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness and safety of TAC and MMF as second-line treatment for AIH.

METHODS

The TAILOR study is a phase IIIB, multicentre, open-label, parallel-group, randomised (1:1) controlled trial performed in large teaching and university hospitals in the Netherlands. We will enrol 86 patients with AIH who have not reached CR after at least 6 months of treatment with first-line therapy. Patients are randomised to TAC (0.07 mg/kg/day initially and adjusted by trough levels) or MMF (max 2000 mg/day), stratified by the presence of cirrhosis at inclusion. The primary endpoint is the difference in the proportion of patients reaching CR after 12 months. Secondary endpoints include the difference in the proportion of patients reaching CR after 6 months, adverse effects, difference in fibrogenesis, quality of life and cost-effectiveness.

DISCUSSION

This is the first randomised controlled trial comparing two second-line therapies for AIH. Currently, second-line treatment is based on retrospective cohort studies. The rarity of AIH is the main issue in clinical research for alternative treatment options. The results of this trial can be implemented in existing international clinical guidelines.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05221411 . Retrospectively registered on 3 February 2022; EudraCT number 2021-003420-33. Prospectively registered on 16 June 2021.

A report of a prospective randomized trial of extended-release tacrolimus versus immediate release tacrolimus after liver transplantation with anti-thymocyte induction in a steroid free protocol

PURPOSE

Our study hypothesis was that once daily dosing of extended-release tacrolimus (XRT) would be a safe and effective immunosuppression (IS) with the potential to decrease adverse events (AEs) associated with immediate release tacrolimus (IRT) after liver transplantation (LT).

METHODS

All patients receiving LT at our center received rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin (RATG) induction therapy. Eligible patients were randomized in a 1:1 fashion to receive either XRT or IRT. Antimicrobial prophylaxis was the same between arms, and both groups received an antimetabolite for the first 6 months following LT. Patients were then followed at pre-determined study intervals for the following year after LT. We administered the RAND-36SF survey to assess patient's health-related quality of life at pre-determined intervals. All analysis was performed with an intention to treat basis.

RESULTS

We screened 194 consecutive patients and enrolled 110. Our control and study arms were well matched. Transplant characteristics were similar between groups. At all timepoints, both arms had similar serum creatinine and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), calculated by MDRD6 equation, with post-transplant GFRs between 60 and 70 mL/min/1.73 m2 . Tacrolimus trough levels were similar between arms. The XRT arm had fewer AEs (166) and fewer serious AEs (70) compared to IRT (201 and 99, respectively). AEs most commonly were renal, infectious, or gastrointestinal in nature. While not statistically significant, XRT was held temporarily (25 vs. 35 cases) or discontinued (3 vs. 11 cases) less frequently than IRT and had fewer instances of rejection (7 vs. 12 cases).

CONCLUSION

This analysis showed that XRT is safe and effective as de novo maintenance IS in a steroid-free protocol with RATG.

The association between tacrolimus exposure and tremor, headache and insomnia in adult kidney transplant recipients: A systematic review

PURPOSE

Tremor, headache and insomnia have been linked to the immunosuppressant, tacrolimus. The aim of this systematic review was to determine if there is a correlation between tacrolimus exposure and new-onset tremor, headache and insomnia experienced by adult kidney transplant recipients.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and CINAHL databases were searched up to 11 April 2023 for published studies which reported on tacrolimus exposure in adult kidney transplant recipients, alongside information on treatment-emergent neurologic manifestations, including tremor, headache and insomnia. Review articles, case studies, conference abstracts and articles not published in English in peer-reviewed journals were excluded. The Physiotherapy Evidence Database and Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scales were used to assess risk of bias. Extracted data was analysed via a narrative synthesis.

RESULTS

Eighteen studies involving 4030 patients in total were included in the final analysis. These comprised five randomised control trials and thirteen observational studies. Studies failed to find significant association between tacrolimus trough concentrations in whole blood and the incidence of neurologic side effects such as tremor, headache and insomnia; however, in one study the incidence of toxicity requiring a dose reduction increased with increasing, supratherapeutic targeted levels. Females, especially Black females, and older age were positively associated with the prevalence of neurologic adverse effects. Results were conflicting regarding whether extended-release formulations were associated with fewer neurologic complications than immediate-release formulations.

CONCLUSION

The varied study designs and criteria for reporting tremor, headache and insomnia impacted on the quality of the data for exploring the relationship between tacrolimus exposure and the onset of neurologic manifestations experienced after kidney transplantation. Studies that examine defined neurologic complications as the primary outcome, and that consider novel markers of tacrolimus exposure while assessing the potential contribution of multiple covariate factors, are required.

Dosing strategies for de novo once-daily extended release tacrolimus in kidney transplant recipients based on CYP3A5 genotype

BACKGROUND

Tacrolimus extended-release tablets have been Food and Drug Administration-approved for use in the de novo kidney transplant population. Dosing requi rements often vary for tacrolimus based on several factors including variation in metabolism based on CYP3A5 expression. Patients who express CYP3A5 often require higher dosing of immediate-release tacrolimus, but this has not been established for tacrolimus extended-release tablets in the de novo setting.

AIM

To obtain target trough concentrations of extended-release tacrolimus in de novo kidney transplant recipients according to CYP3A5 genotype.

METHODS

Single-arm, prospective, single-center, open-label, observational study (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT037 13645). Life cycle pharma tacrolimus (LCPT) orally once daily at a starting dose of 0.13 mg/kg/day based on actual body weight. If weight is more than 120% of ideal body weight, an adjusted body weight was used. LCPT dose was adjusted to maintain tacrolimus trough concentrations of 8-10 ng/mL. Pharmacogenetic analysis of CYP3A5 genotype was performed at study conclusion.

RESULTS

Mean time to therapeutic tacrolimus trough concentration was longer in CYP3A5 intermediate and extensive metabolizers vs CYP3A5 non-expressers (6 d vs 13.5 d vs 4.5 d; P = 0.025). Mean tacrolimus doses and weight-based doses to achieve therapeutic concentration were higher in CYP3A5 intermediate and extensive metabolizers vs CYP3A5 non-expressers (16 mg vs 16 mg vs 12 mg; P = 0.010) (0.20 mg/kg vs 0.19 mg/kg vs 0.13 mg/kg; P = 0.018). CYP3A5 extensive metabolizers experienced lower mean tacrolimus trough concentrations throughout the study period compared to CYP3A5 intermediate metabolizers and non-expressers (7.98 ng/mL vs 9.18 ng/mL vs 10.78 ng/mL; P = 0 0.008). No differences were identified with regards to kidney graft function at 30-d post-transplant. Serious adverse events were reported for 13 (36%) patients.

CONCLUSION

Expression of CYP3A5 leads to higher starting doses and incremental dosage titration of extended-release tacro limus to achieve target trough concentrations. We suggest a higher starting dose of 0.2 mg/kg/d for CYP3A5 expressers.

Tremor Induced by Cyclosporine, Tacrolimus, Sirolimus, or Everolimus: A Review of the Literature

Calcineurin inhibitors such as cyclosporine and tacrolimus are immunosuppressant drugs that are known to induce tremors. Non-calcineurin inhibitors such as sirolimus and everolimus have also reportedly been accompanied by tremors, albeit less likely. However, the prevalence rates reported in the literature are notably wide, and the risk profiles for these drug-induced tremors are less understood. We searched PubMed to extract data on the risk of tremors with these drugs when prescribed for various transplant and non-transplant indications. We ascertained whether the risk of drug-induced tremor is influenced by the underlying diagnosis, dosing formulations, drug concentrations, and blood monitoring. We extracted data on treatment strategies and outcomes for tremors. Articles were primarily screened based on English language publications, abstracts, and studies with n ≥ 5, which included case series, retrospective studies, case-controlled studies, and prospective studies. We found 81 eligible studies comprising 33 cyclosporine, 43 tacrolimus, 6 sirolimus, and 1 everolimus that discussed tremor as an adverse event. In the pooled analysis of studies with n > 100, the incidence of tremor was 17% with cyclosporine, 21.5% with tacrolimus, and 7.8% with sirolimus and everolimus together. Regarding the underlying diagnosis, tremor was more frequently reported in kidney transplant (cyclosporine 28%, tacrolimus 30.1%) and bone marrow transplant (cyclosporine 40%, tacrolimus 41.9%) patients compared with liver transplant (cyclosporine 9%, tacrolimus 11.5%) and nontransplant indications (cyclosporine 21.5%, tacrolimus 11.3%). Most studies did not report whether the risk of tremors correlated with drug concentrations in the blood. The prevalence of tremors when using the twice-daily formulation of tacrolimus was nearly the same as the once-daily formulation (17% vs 18%). Data on individual-level risk factors for tremors were lacking. Except for three studies that found some benefit to maintaining magnesium levels, there were minimal data on treatments and outcomes. A large body of data supports a substantive and wide prevalence of tremor resulting from tacrolimus use followed by cyclosporine, especially in patients receiving a kidney transplant. However, there is little reporting on the patient-related risk factors for tremor, risk relationship with drug concentrations, treatment strategies, and outcomes.

Retrospective evaluation of LCP-tacrolimus (Envarsus XR) dosing in de novo kidney transplant

INTRODUCTION

Tacrolimus is known to exhibit significant inter- and intra-patient pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) variability regarding therapeutic response. LCP-tacrolimus (LCPT-Envarsus XR) was approved in 2018 for use as a de novo immunosuppressive agent in kidney transplants, but there is limited evidence to guide de novo dosing of LCPT in patients with obesity. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of different calculated weight-based de novo LCPT dosing on early transplant outcomes.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of patients with obesity (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2 ) who received a kidney transplant at the University of Illinois Hospital and Health System (UIH), between March 2019 and March 2021. Subjects were included if were age 18 years or older and received de novo LCPT throughout index hospitalization. The primary endpoint of this study was to compare correlations between the first tacrolimus trough level and dosing weight strategy (e.g., TBW, AdjBW, IBW).

RESULTS

There was a statistically significant, though modest, correlation between all three dosing strategies and the first tacrolimus trough level (TBW correlation coefficient = .431, p < .001; AdjBW correlation coefficient = .455, p < .001; IBW correlation coefficient = .465; p < .001). In regression modeling for supratherapeutic levels each additional .01 mg/kg increase in dose by TBW, AdjBW, and IBW increased the odds of a supratherapeutic level by 1.46, 1.34, and 1.24, respectively (p < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of LCPT in kidney transplant recipients with obesity dosed using TBW demonstrated the strongest correlation with initial supratherapeutic tacrolimus levels. Larger prospective studies are needed to investigate the further impact of body weight on dosing regimens in the obese population.

Efficacy and safety of once-daily prolonged-release tacrolimus versus twice-daily tacrolimus in kidney transplant recipients: A meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis

BACKGROUND

Kidney transplantation is the most important treatment for end-stage renal disease. Immunosuppressive therapies can prevent acute rejection for kidney transplant recipients. Tacrolimus is usually administered to prevent graft rejection after transplantation. Previous studies have indicated that once-daily tacrolimus may improve medication adherence. Therefore, this meta-analysis aimed to compare clinical outcomes between once-daily and twice-daily tacrolimus in de novo renal transplant patients.

METHODS

Eligible studies were identified from the Cochrane Library Database, PubMed, and Embase until July 2022. Those randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating once-daily versus twice-daily tacrolimus formulations in de novo renal transplantation were included. A summary risk ratio (RR) and standardized mean difference (SMD) with the 95% confidence interval (CI) were estimated using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

In total, nine RCTs were included. There were no differences in biopsy-confirmed acute rejection rates between patients with once-daily and those with twice-daily tacrolimus (RR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.73-1.13) in 12 months. Regarding renal function, there was no significant difference between the once-daily and twice-daily tacrolimus groups (SMD, -0.03; 95% CI, -0.12 to 0.07). In addition, the risk of graft failure, death, and adverse events in the first year was similar for the once-daily and twice-daily tacrolimus groups.

CONCLUSION

Our major findings suggest that de novo renal transplantation recipients receiving once-daily tacrolimus immediately after transplantation have comparable efficacy and safety with those recipients who received twice-daily tacrolimus. Therefore, once-daily tacrolimus medication can be an alternative for de novo renal transplantation recipients.

The Association of Tacrolimus Formulation on Cerebral Blood Flow and Cognitive Function

Calcineurin inhibitors are inherent vasoconstrictors. Cerebral vasoconstriction can reduce cerebral blood flow (CBF), and negatively impact cerebrovascular response (CVR) to exercise, and cognitive function. The once-daily extended-release (LCP) tacrolimus has fewer side effects than the immediate-release (IR) tacrolimus. The role of calcineurin inhibitors on CBF and the impact of specific formulations of tacrolimus on CBF, CVR, and cognitive function are unknown. In this pilot study, we evaluated whether changing from IR tacrolimus to LCP tacrolimus modulates CBF, CVR, or cognitive function in kidney transplant (KT) recipients.

Methods

We randomized (2:1) 30 stable KT recipients on IR tacrolimus to intervention (switch to LCP tacrolimus) and control (continue IR tacrolimus) arms. We measured CBF, CVR, and cognitive function at baseline and at 12 wk. We used ANCOVA to evaluate changes in outcome variables, with baseline values and study arm as covariates. We used descriptive statistics with mean changes in outcome variables to compare the 2 groups.

Results

Participants were 51 ± 13 y old. There was no difference in plasma tacrolimus levels at baseline and at 12 wk in the 2 arms. The changes in CBF, resting middle cerebral artery velocity, CVR, and cognitive function were more favorable in the intervention arm than in the control group.

Conclusions

Changing IR tacrolimus to LCP tacrolimus may improve CBF, cerebrovascular dynamics, and cognitive function in KT recipients. Larger studies are needed to confirm these results.

EnGraft: a multicentre, open-label, randomised, two-arm, superiority study protocol to assess bioavailability and practicability of Envarsus® versus Advagraf™ in liver transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Graft rejection and chronic CNI toxicity remain obstacles to organ transplant success. Current formulations of tacrolimus, such as Prograf® and Advagraf™, exhibit limitations in terms of pharmacokinetics and tolerability, related in part to suboptimal bioavailability. As dosing non-compliance can result in graft rejection, the once daily formulation of tacrolimus, Advagraf™, was developed (vs 2x/day Prograf®). Benefits of Advagraf™ are counterbalanced by delayed achievement of therapeutic trough levels and need for up to 50% higher doses to maintain Prograf®-equivalent troughs. Envarsus® is also a prolonged-release once-daily tacrolimus formulation, developed using MeltDose™ drug-delivery technology to increase drug bioavailability; improved bioavailability results in low patient drug absorption variability and less pronounced peak-to-trough fluctuations. In phase III de novo kidney transplant studies, Envarsus® proved non-inferior to twice-daily tacrolimus; however, no phase IV studies show superiority of Envarsus® vs Advagraf™ in de novo liver transplant (LTx) recipients.

METHODS

The EnGraft compares bioavailability and tests superiority of Envarsus® (test arm) versus Advagraf™ (comparator arm) in de novo LTx recipients. A total of 268 patients from 15 German transplant centres will be randomised 1:1 within 14 days post-LTx. The primary endpoint is dose-normalised trough level (C/D ratio) measured 12 weeks after randomisation. Secondary endpoints include the number of dose adjustments, time to reach first defined trough level and incidence of graft rejections. Additionally, clinical and laboratory parameters will be assessed over a 3-year period.

DISCUSSION

C/D ratio is an estimate for tacrolimus bioavailability. Improving bioavailability and increasing C/D ratio using Envarsus could reduce renal dysfunction and other tacrolimus-related toxicities; previous trials have shown that a higher C/D ratio (i.e. slower tacrolimus metabolism) is not only associated with improved renal function but also linked to reduced neurotoxic side effects. A higher C/D ratio could improve clinical outcomes for LTx recipients; EnGraft has begun, with one third of patients recruited by January 2022.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This trial has been registered (4 May 2020) in the EU Clinical Trials Register, EudraCT-Nummer: 2020-000796-20. Additionally, this trial has been registered (22 January 2021) at ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04720326. The trial received a favourable opinion from the concerned lead ethics committee at the University of Regensburg, under the reference 20-1842-112.

Envarsus XR® pharmacokinetics in adolescents post-kidney transplantation - A pilot study

INTRODUCTION

Envarsus XR® (LCPT), a once daily dosage formulation of tacrolimus, is an FDA-approved medication in adult renal transplant recipients (RTRs). There are limited data on its pharmacokinetics (PK) in adolescent RTRs. We report here the PK profile of LCPT in adolescent RTRs.

METHODS

The dose of LCPT was determined using a dose conversion ratio targeting 0.7 relative to the total daily immediate-release tacrolimus (IR-Tac) dose. On day 7 after converting to LCPT, patients had an abbreviated PK assessment with sampling at: 0 h (pre-dose), 8-, and 12-h post-dose. The PK data analysis was performed using Bayesian estimators. Our results were compared to those of published adult PK data for LCPT and pediatric PK data for IR-Tac and extended release tacrolimus (ER-Tac) formulation (Advagraf).

RESULTS

PK data from three adolescent patients on LCPT were evaluated. The mean (±SD) area under the time-concentration curve (AUC) was 240 (±20.22) h*ng/mL. The mean T_max was 9.01 ± 2.12 h, and the % fluctuation was 77.71 ± 3.96%. The AUC, T_max , and % fluctuation were similar to reported results in adult patients taking LCPT. The AUC was higher and the T_max was longer than what has been reported in pediatric patients taking IR-Tac and ER-Tac. In addition, the LCPT group showed a lower % fluctuation than patients receiving ER-Tac.

CONCLUSION

The PK evaluation of LCPT in adolescent RTRs showed similar results to adults. Adolescents taking LCPT had a higher AUC, a more attenuated T_max , and a lower fluctuation than that seen with ER-Tac in pediatrics.

Real-life comparison of efficacy and safety profiles of two prolonged-release tacrolimus formulations in de novo kidney transplant recipients: 24 months of follow-up

INTRODUCTION

Calcineurin inhibitors constitute a cornerstone of immunosuppressive therapy in kidney transplant recipients. There are two main formulations of tacrolimus (Tac) which exhibit a prolonged-release mode of action: Advagraf® (MR-4) and Envarsus® (LCPT). However, they are not bioequivalent. Data comparing both once-daily prolonged-release formulations of Tac are insufficient.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to compare safety and efficacy profiles of once-daily LCPT and MR-4 formulations of tacrolimus in adult kidney transplant recipients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

An observational, cohort single-center study was performed. One hundred fifteen kidney transplant recipients transplanted between 2016 and 2019 were enrolled to the study (59 vs 56, Envarsus® vs Advagraf®, respectively). Safety and efficacy profiles were assessed.

RESULTS

Patient and graft survival at 12 and 24 months did not differ between the groups. There were no significant differences in serum creatinine at any timepoint. C/D ratio in the LCPT group was significantly higher at 12 and 24 months. Sepsis occurrence was more frequent in MR-4 group at 12 months.

CONCLUSION

Both prolonged-release formulations of tacrolimus are safe and effective in immunosuppressive therapy in kidney transplant recipients.

Phenomenology and Physiology of Tacrolimus Induced Tremor

Background

Tacrolimus is a potent immunosuppressant drug commonly used after solid organ transplant surgery. The use of this drug is frequently associated with the emergence of tremors. There is little information on the clinical and physiological characteristics of tacrolimus-induced tremors. Characterizing these tremors is essential as they can promote the development of specific therapies.

Methods

We describe four patients placed on tacrolimus immunosuppressant therapy following kidney transplant surgery and who developed tremors impacting their daily functional activities. We describe the clinical and physiological characteristics of the tremor and the response generated after a limb cooling test.

Results

A postural and kinetic tremor mainly involving the distal hands was observed in our cohort. In the accelerometer-based assessment, the tremor amplitude was noted to be mild to moderate, and the frequency was 5-6 Hz. Cooling the forearm and the hand led to a temporary albeit significant reduction of tremor amplitude (p = 0.03). Limb cooling lowered the tremor frequency by 1 Hz in two patients with no change in the other two patients, and the statistical comparison was not significant (p > 0.05).

Conclusions

Limb cooling may be pursued as a therapeutic option for addressing tacrolimus-induced tremor, as the patients in our cohort benefitted from temporary tremor suppression.

Tremor, Daily Functioning, and Health-Related Quality of Life in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients

Solid organ transplant recipients (SOTR) frequently report tremor. Data concerning tremor-related impairment and its potential impact on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) are lacking. This cross-sectional study assesses impact of tremor on activities of daily living and HRQoL using validated questionnaires among SOTR enrolled in the TransplantLines Biobank and Cohort Study. We included 689 SOTR (38.5% female, mean [±SD] age 58 [±14] years) at median [interquartile range] 3 [1-9] years after transplantation, of which 287 (41.7%) reported mild or severe tremor. In multinomial logistic regression analyses, whole blood tacrolimus trough concentration was an independent determinant of mild tremor (OR per µg/L increase: 1.11, 95% CI: 1.02 to 1.21, p = 0.019). Furthermore, in linear regression analyses, severe tremor was strongly and independently associated with lower physical and mental HRQoL (β = -16.10, 95% CI: -22.23 to -9.98, p < 0.001 and β = -12.68, 95% CI: -18.23 to -7.14, p < 0.001 resp.). SOTR frequently report tremor-related impairment of activities of daily living. Tacrolimus trough concentrations appeared as a main determinant of tremor among SOTR. The strong and independent association of tremor-related impairment with lower HRQoL warrants further studies into the effects of tacrolimus on tremor. Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, Identifier NCT03272841.

Outcomes in kidney transplant recipients treated with immediate-release tacrolimus capsules versus extended-release tacrolimus capsules: A cohort study

INTRODUCTION

Prior randomized trials and observational studies have generally reported similar outcomes in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) treated with immediate-release tacrolimus (IR-TAC) versus extended-release tacrolimus (ER-TAC). However, many of these previous studies focused on patients with low immunological risks, had small sample sizes and brief follow-up periods, and excluded outcomes associated with graft loss, such as chronic rejection.

METHODS

To address these limitations, we conducted a cohort study of 848 KTRs at a single transplantation center who had generally high immunological risks and were treated with either IR-TAC capsules (589 patients, 65.9%) or ER-TAC capsules (289 patients, 34.1%). All patients received their designated maintenance immunosuppressive regimen for at least 3 months post-transplantation. Afterwards, tacrolimus formulation was at the discretion of each patient's transplant nephrologist. For the two treatment groups, we compared the hazards of experiencing a composite outcome of acute or chronic antibody-mediated rejection (AMR), acute or chronic T-cell-mediated rejection, de novo DSA, and/or graft loss over a 3-year period starting at 3 months post-transplantation.

RESULTS

In a multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression model, KTRs treated with IR-TAC capsules had an increased hazard of experiencing the composite outcome when compared to patients treated with ER-TAC capsules; however, this result was not significant (adj HR 1.24, 95% CI .92-1.68, p = .163). Similar results were obtained with inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) using a propensity score (adj HR 1.25, 95% CI .93-1.68, p = .146).

CONCLUSION

These findings suggest that when compared to IR-TAC capsules, ER-TAC capsules do not reduce the hazard of poor outcomes in KTRs with generally high immunological risks.

Helper T Cell (CD4+) Targeted Tacrolimus Delivery Mediates Precise Suppression of Allogeneic Humoral Immunity

Antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) is a major cause of dysfunction and loss of transplanted kidney. The current treatments for ABMR involve nonspecific inhibition and clearance of T/B cells or plasma cells. However, the prognosis of patients following current treatment is poor. T follicular helper cells (Tfh) play an important role in allograft-specific antibodies secreting plasma cell (PC) development. Tfh cells are therefore considered to be important therapeutic targets for the treatment of antibody hypersecretion disorders, such as transplant rejection and autoimmune diseases. Tacrolimus (Tac), the primary immunosuppressant, prevents rejection by reducing T cell activation. However, its administration should be closely monitored to avoid serious side effects. In this study, we investigated whether Tac delivery to helper T (CD4⁺) cells using functionalized mesoporous nanoparticles can block Tfh cell differentiation after alloantigen exposure. Results showed that Tac delivery ameliorated humoral rejection injury in rodent kidney graft by suppressing Tfh cell development, PC, and donor-specific antibody (DSA) generation without causing severe side effects compared with delivery through the drug administration pathway. This study provides a promising therapeutic strategy for preventing humoral rejection in solid organ transplantation. The specific and controllable drug delivery avoids multiple disorder risks and side effects observed in currently used clinical approaches.

Immunosuppressive drugs and associated complications in abdominal organ transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Intensive care management of patients who have undergone organ transplantation of liver, small bowel, pancreas, and/or kidney requires a basic knowledge of immunosuppression principles and the management of immunosuppressive medications. This review highlights the core principles of immunosuppression management in abdominal organ transplantation with a focus on complications arising from immunosuppressive drugs, both in the immediate postoperative period and in long-term usage.

RECENT FINDINGS

The general principles of management of immunosuppression in the abdominal organ transplant population have remained largely unchanged. Improvements in drug monitoring coupled with improvements in knowledge of pathways involved in allograft rejection have further refined immunosuppressive therapy. Infectious and central nervous system complications remain prevalent and are common complications of immunosuppressive drug therapy.

SUMMARY

For the intensive care professional who cares for abdominal organ transplant recipients, a foundational knowledge of the core principles of immunosuppression management is essential. In addition, an understanding of the common immunosuppressive drug regimens and the complications associated with these regimens is required for optimal management, risk assessment, and outcomes.

Two-Year Outcomes of Low-Exposure Extended-Release Tacrolimus and Mycophenolate Mofetil Regimen in De Novo Kidney Transplantation: A Multi-center Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Once-daily extended-release tacrolimus (TACER) is commonly administered following kidney transplantation (KTx); however, its optimal dosage remains unknown.

METHODS

In this multi-center, randomized controlled trial, 62 living donor KTx recipients were assigned to either standard-exposure (SE; n = 32) or low-exposure (LE; n = 30) TACER (Graceptor®, Astellas Pharm Inc.) groups. All patients received basiliximab and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). The primary outcomes were acute rejection, graft/patient survival, and the secondary outcomes were incidence of cytomegalovirus infection, and de novo donor-specific antibodies (dnDSA) production.

RESULTS

The tacrolimus trough level and estimated area under the blood concentration-time curve (eAUC) were significantly higher in SE than in LE (SE vs LE; one year: 5.0 ± 0.9 ng/mL and 206.9 ± 26.8 ngཥh/mL vs 3.4 ± 1.0 ng/mL and 153.9 ± 26.4 ngཥh/mL; two years: 4.8 ± 1.0 ng/mL and 204.9 ± 30.1 ngཥh/mL vs 3.8 ± 0.9 ng/mL and 164.4 ± 27.0 ngཥh/mL). In contrast, the dosage and eAUC of MMF did not differ between groups. Two-year graft and patient survival rates were 100% in both groups, and acute rejection rates were 0% and 10% in the SE and LE, respectively (p = 0.11). The mean estimated glomerular filtration rates did not differ between the groups. Cytomegalovirus infection was slightly lower in the LE (SE: 12.5% and LE: 6.7%, p = 0.37). In the LE, four cases of dnDSA were noted within two years of transplantation; no case was observed in the SE (p = 0.034).

CONCLUSIONS

Although the LE TACER regimen showed similar rates of acute rejection, as well as graft and patient survival compared with SE after KTx, LE was significantly more associated with dnDSA. Further investigation of its long-term effect on graft survival is warranted. (University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry ID: UMIN000033089). This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Reducing the Pill Burden: Immunosuppressant Adherence and Safety after Conversion from a Twice-Daily (IR-Tac) to a Novel Once-Daily (LCP-Tac) Tacrolimus Formulation in 161 Liver Transplant Patients

Non-adherence to immunosuppressant therapy reduces long-term graft and patient survival after solid organ transplantation. The objective of this 24-month prospective study was to determine adherence, efficacy and safety after conversion of stable liver transplant (LT) recipients from a standard twice-daily immediate release Tacrolimus (IR-Tac) to a novel once-daily life cycle pharma Tacrolimus (LCP-Tac) formulation. We converted a total of 161 LT patients at baseline, collecting Tacrolimus trough levels, laboratories, physical examination data and the BAASIS^© questionnaire for self-reported adherence to immunosuppression at regular intervals. With 134 participants completing the study period (17% dropouts), the overall adherence to the BAASIS^© increased by 57% until month 24 compared to baseline (51% vs. 80%). Patients who required only a morning dose of their concomitant medications reported the largest improvement in adherence after conversion. The intra-patient variability (IPV) of consecutive Tacrolimus trough levels after conversion did not change significantly compared to pre-conversion levels. Despite reducing the daily dose by 30% at baseline as recommended by the manufacturer, Tac-trough levels remained stable, reflected by an increase in the concentration-dose (C/D) ratio. No episodes of graft rejection or loss occurred. Our data suggest that the use of LCP-Tac in liver transplant patients is safe and can increase adherence to immunosuppression compared to conventional IR-Tac.

Visual evoked potentials as a method for the prospective assessment of tacrolimus neurotoxicity in patients after kidney transplantation

INTRODUCTION

Neurotoxicity, including optic nerve injury, is one of the most common adverse effects of tacrolimus, the principal calcineurin inhibitor used after kidney transplantation (KTx). The electrophysiologic measurements of both pattern visual evoked potentials (PVEP) and flash visual evoked potentials (FVEP) are valuable when drug-induced optic neuropathy is suspected.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether VEP measurement is a sensitive and repeatable method for monitoring tacrolimus neurotoxicity.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This prospective study focused on 35 patients (20 M, 15F, 69 eyes, mean age 43 ± 11 years) who were at a median of 3.0 (IQR, 2.2-3.7) months after KTx at the time of the initial VEP evaluation and were treated with tacrolimus since KTx. The follow-up VEP examination was done after a median of 24 (22-27) months (both VEP measurements followed the ISCEV standards). The P100 wave latency and amplitude for the 1° and 15' PVEP simulations, and the P2 wave latency and amplitude for the FVEP were analyzed.

RESULTS

For the 1° checks, the P100 wave latency and amplitude values were significantly worse in the follow-up examination compared to the early post-transplant time-point. Independent associations between FVEP parameters and the tacrolimus blood trough level were observed in the follow-up examination but not at the early post-transplant period. The P2 wave latency correlated with the tacrolimus trough level only in patients treated with the twice-daily, but not the once-daily, tacrolimus formulation. The brain derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) level correlated with the P100 (15') latency (R = 0.499; p = 0.005) and the P2 latency (R = 0.409; p = 0.025) only in patients treated with the once-daily, but not the twice-daily, tacrolimus formulation.

CONCLUSION

The observations in this study may support the rationale for the use of VEP measurements as non-invasive monitoring of subclinical tacrolimus neurotoxicity.

A randomized crossover study comparing different tacrolimus formulations to reduce intrapatient variability in tacrolimus exposure in kidney transplant recipients

A high intrapatient variability (IPV) in tacrolimus exposure is a risk factor for poor long‐term outcomes after kidney transplantation. The main objective of this trial was to investigate whether tacrolimus IPV decreases after switching patients from immediate‐release (IR)‐tacrolimus to either extended‐release (ER)‐tacrolimus or LifeCyclePharma (LCP)‐tacrolimus. In this randomized, prospective, open‐label, cross‐over trial, adult kidney transplant recipients on a stable immunosuppressive regimen, including IR‐tacrolimus, were randomized for conversion to ER‐tacrolimus or LCP‐tacrolimus, and for the order in which IR‐tacrolimus and the once‐daily formulations were taken. Patients were followed 6 months for each formulation, with monthly tacrolimus predose concentration assessments to calculate the IPV. The IPV was defined as the coefficient of variation (%) of dose corrected predose concentrations. Ninety‐two patients were included for analysis of the primary outcome. No significant differences between the IPV of IR‐tacrolimus (16.6%) and the combined once‐daily formulations (18.3%) were observed (% difference +1.7%, 95% confidence interval [CI] −1.1% to ‒4.5%, p = 0.24). The IPV of LCP‐tacrolimus (20.1%) was not significantly different from the IPV of ER‐tacrolimus (16.5%, % difference +3.6%, 95% CI −0.1% to 7.3%, p = 0.06). In conclusion, the IPV did not decrease after switching from IR‐tacrolimus to either ER‐tacrolimus or LCP‐tacrolimus. These results provide no arguments to switch kidney transplant recipients from twice‐daily (IR) tacrolimus formulations to once‐daily (modified‐release) tacrolimus formulations when the aim is to lower the IPV.

Bioavailability of once-daily tacrolimus formulations used in clinical practice in the management of De Novo kidney transplant recipients: the better study

Multicenter, prospective, observational study to compare the relative bioavailability of once‐daily tacrolimus formulations in de novo kidney transplant recipients. De novo kidney transplant recipients who started a tacrolimus‐based regimen were included 14 days post‐transplant and followed up for 6 months. Data from 218 participants were evaluated: 129 in the LCPT group (Envarsus) and 89 in the PR‐Tac (Advagraf) group. Patients in the LCPT group exhibited higher relative bioavailability (C_min /total daily dose [TDD]) vs. PR‐Tac (61% increase; P < .001) with similar C_min and 30% lower TDD levels (P < .0001). The incidence of treatment failure was 3.9% in the LCPT group and 9.0% in the PR‐Tac group (P = .117). Study discontinuation rates were 6.2% in the LCPT group and 12.4% in the PR‐Tac group (P = .113). Adverse events, renal function and other complications were comparable between groups. The median accumulated dose of tacrolimus in the LCPT group from day 14 to month 6 was 889 mg. Compared to PR‐Tac, LCPT showed higher relative bioavailability, similar effectiveness at preventing allograft rejection, comparable effect on renal function, safety, adherence, treatment failure and premature discontinuation rates.

De novo tacrolimus extended-release tablets (LCPT) versus twice-daily tacrolimus in adult heart transplantation: Results of a single-center non-inferiority matched control trial

Extended-release tacrolimus for prophylaxis of allograft rejection in orthotopic heart transplant (OHT) recipients is currently not FDA-approved. One such extended-release formulation of tacrolimus known as LCPT allows once-daily dosing and improves bioavailability compared to immediate-release tacrolimus (IR-tacrolimus). We compared the efficacy and safety of LCPT to IR-tacrolimus applied de novo in adult OHT recipients. Twenty-five prospective recipients on LCPT at our center from 2017 to 2019 were matched 1:2 with historical control recipients treated with IR-tacrolimus based on age, gender, and baseline creatinine. The primary composite outcome of death, acute cellular rejection, and/or new graft dysfunction within 1 year was compared using non-inferiority analysis. LCPT demonstrated non-inferiority to IR-tacrolimus, with a primary outcome risk reduction of 20% (90% CI: -40%, -.5%; non-inferiority P = .001). Tacrolimus trough levels peaked at 2-3 months and were higher in LCPT (median 14.5 vs. 12.7 ng/ml; P = .03) with similar dose levels (LCPT vs. IR-tacrolimus: .08 vs. .09 mg/kg/day; P = .33). Cardiovascular-related readmissions were reduced by 62% (P = .046) in LCPT patients. The complication rate per transplant admission and all-cause readmission rate did not differ significantly. These results suggest that LCPT is non-inferior in efficacy to IR-tacrolimus with a similar safety profile and improved bioavailability in OHT.

Comparing the pharmacokinetics of extended-release tacrolimus (LCP-TAC) to immediate-release formulations in kidney transplant patients

INTRODUCTION

One of the most commonly used immunosuppressants in organ transplant, tacrolimus exhibits wide interpatient and intrapatient variability and narrow therapeutic index that necessitates routine concentration monitoring and dosage adjustments. Availability of modified -release tacrolimus products offer once-daily dosing options. The objective of this review is to highlight and compare available pharmacokinetic (PK) data of extended-release tacrolimus tablets (LCP-TAC) to immediate-release tacrolimus (IR-TAC) in kidney transplant recipients.

AREAS COVERED

A review of the literature was performed using PubMed and Embase search to identify relevant articles evaluating PK data for LCP-TAC compared to IR-TAC in kidney transplant patients including special populations.

EXPERT OPINION

LCP-TAC's unique PK profile may be more favorable than IR-TAC. While the clinical impact of these PK differences have not been established, several outcomes are being evaluated in ongoing studies. Results of these studies will add information incrementally to care for kidney transplant patients. Larger prospective studies evaluating kidney and patient survival differences are needed but it is unlikely that they will be conducted. Given that the patent exclusivity of LCP-TAC for the next several years and imminent loss of exclusivity of PR-TAC, our opinion is the use of LCP-TAC will be increasing, especially in Europe.

Long-Term Immunosuppression Management: Opportunities and Uncertainties

The long-term management of maintenance immunosuppression in kidney transplant recipients remains complex. The vast majority of patients are treated with the calcineurin inhibitor tacrolimus as the primary agent in combination with mycophenolate, with or without corticosteroids. A tacrolimus trough target 5-8 ng/ml seems to be optimal for rejection prophylaxis, but long-term tacrolimus-related side effects and nephrotoxicity support the ongoing evaluation of noncalcineurin inhibitor-based regimens. Current alternatives include belatacept or mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors. For the former, superior kidney function at 7 years post-transplant compared with cyclosporin generated initial enthusiasm, but utilization has been hampered by high initial rejection rates. Mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors have yielded mixed results as well, with improved kidney function tempered by higher risk of rejection, proteinuria, and adverse effects leading to higher discontinuation rates. Mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors may play a role in the secondary prevention of squamous cell skin cancer as conversion from a calcineurin inhibitor to an mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor resulted in a reduction of new lesion development. Early withdrawal of corticosteroids remains an attractive strategy but also is associated with a higher risk of rejection despite no difference in 5-year patient or graft survival. A major barrier to long-term graft survival is chronic alloimmunity, and regardless of agent used, managing the toxicities of immunosuppression against the risk of chronic antibody-mediated rejection remains a fragile balance.

Evaluating the conversion to extended-release tacrolimus from immediate-release tacrolimus in liver transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

A new formulation of once daily extended-release tacrolimus (LCP-tac, Envarsus XR) was approved for use in the USA for kidney transplant recipients in 2015. There are limited data regarding real-world observations with conversion to LCP-tac in liver transplant recipients.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of liver transplant recipients treated with LCP-tac. Data collection included (1) reasons for switching to LCP-tac; (2) conversion ratio used; (3) kidney function at time of conversion and 3 months after; (4) outcomes of conversion [acute cellular rejection rates and cytomegalovirus (CMV) viremia] within 3 months of conversion.

RESULTS

Average conversion ratio used to achieve therapeutic drug level without further dose adjustment was 1:0.73 (SD 0.11). Median time after transplant was 508 days (IQR 736). Common reasons patients were switched to LCP-tac were from fluctuations in tacrolimus levels (44%) and adverse effect of tremor (32%). Among patients who were switched due to tremors 88% noted significant improvement. There was no difference in serum creatinine (P = 0.55) or glomerular filtration rate (P = 0.64) from baseline to 3 months postconversion. There were no episodes of acute cellular rejections or CMV viremia postconversion.

CONCLUSION

This observational study demonstrated that conversion of immediate-release tacrolimus to LCP-tac in liver transplant recipients was well tolerated and effective.

Identifying the association between tacrolimus exposure and toxicity in heart and lung transplant recipients: A systematic review

AIMS

Tacrolimus is the cornerstone of immunosuppression management in heart and lung transplant recipients, improving overall survival. However, tacrolimus-associated toxicities, including nephrotoxicity, neurotoxicity, new-onset diabetes mellitus after transplant (NODAT), and gastrointestinal toxicity, are known contributors to increased post-transplant morbidity outcomes and reduced graft and recipient survival rates. The aim of this systematic review was to identify correlations between pharmacokinetic measures of tacrolimus exposure in heart and lung recipients and tacrolimus toxicities.

METHODS

MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library, CENTRAL and WHO Clinical Trial Registries were searched for published studies evaluating tacrolimus toxicities and their correlation to pharmacokinetic monitoring parameters in thoracic transplant recipients. Studies were reviewed by two authors, with data extracted for evaluation. Risk of bias was assessed using the PEDro scale for randomised control trials and the Newcastle Ottawa Scale for non-randomised cohort studies.

RESULTS

Eighteen studies were eligible; a randomised control trial, 11 observational cohort studies, and 6 case series or studies. Of these, 9 studies were in heart transplant recipients alone and 5 in lung transplant recipients alone, 2 studies were in heart and lung transplant recipients and 2 were heart, lung, liver or renal transplant recipients. Studies used variable criteria to define toxicities. Tacrolimus trough concentration (C₀) was the marker of tacrolimus exposure most commonly used. Ten studies reported on nephrotoxicity. Elevated tacrolimus C₀ was associated with acute kidney injury occurrence and severity in three observational studies. Increasing C₀ was a predictor of renal impairment in 6 studies. One study found that for each 5 ng/mL per year of tacrolimus exposure, defined by consecutive AUC, eGFR declined by 1.3 mL/min/1.73m² (p < 0.001). Comparatively, 2 studies failed to find a significant association between nephrotoxicity and tacrolimus exposure. Seven studies reported on neurotoxicity, including neuro-encephalopathies, polyneuropathies and symptomatic change in neurological status. Neurotoxicity occurred both with tacrolimus C₀ within therapeutic range and with supratherapeutic C₀. No significant association was found between NODAT and tacrolimus C₀ in two studies. One study reported on gastrointestinal toxicity, with supratherapeutic C₀ and elevated peak concentration in one lung transplant recipient three days prior to symptom development.

CONCLUSION

No clearly defined relationship between tacrolimus exposure and toxicities is described in the literature. Studies with clear toxicity criteria and pharmacokinetic markers of tacrolimus exposure are required to provide valuable information that may optimise tacrolimus therapy, helping to reduce toxicities in heart and lung transplant recipients.

Clinical Experience with Extended-Release Tacrolimus in Older Adult Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Extended-release tacrolimus (LCP-Tac) prescribing information states that there is insufficient data in older adult patients from which to make recommendations on use in this population. This study sought to provide information on de novo use of LCP-Tac in the older adult kidney transplant population.

METHODS

This single-center retrospective study had two distinct objectives; to determine if weight-based doses of LCP-Tac differ based on recipient age and to compare safety and efficacy between LCP-Tac and immediate-release tacrolimus (IR-Tac) in older adult transplant recipients. Data was obtained through electronic chart review up to 2 years after transplant with censoring for graft loss and death.

RESULTS

Weight-based doses were compared between patients aged ≥ 65 years (n = 84), 36-64 years (n = 64), and ≤35 years (n = 44). LCP-Tac weight-based doses were lower at all time points in patients ≥ 65 years of age. Both age and race significantly impacted required dose on linear regression. The doses required to achieve therapeutic tacrolimus troughs were significantly lower in all age groups compared with the current FDA de novo dosing recommendation. In the older adult population, graft outcomes and infectious and metabolic complications were compared between recipients of LCP-Tac (n = 84) and IR-Tac (n = 42). Within this cohort, there were no differences between LCP-Tac and IR-Tac on graft function, rejection, graft loss, death, cytomegalovirus viremia, BK viremia, hypertension, diabetes, alopecia, or tremor up to 2 years after transplant.

CONCLUSIONS

Older adult recipients required significantly lower LCP-Tac doses compared with younger recipients and with the FDA-labeled starting dose. There were no differences in graft outcomes or adverse effects in older adult patients who received LCP-Tac versus IR-Tac.

Thirty Years of Tacrolimus in Clinical Practice

Tacrolimus was discovered in 1984 and entered clinical use shortly thereafter, contributing to successful solid organ transplantation across the globe. In this review, we cover development of tacrolimus, its evolving clinical utility, and issues affecting its current usage. Since earliest use of this class of immunosuppressant, concerns for calcineurin-inhibitor toxicity have led to efforts to minimize or eliminate these agents in clinical regimens but with limited success. Current understanding of the role of tacrolimus focuses more on its efficacy in preventing graft rejection and graft loss. As we enter the fourth decade of tacrolimus use, newer studies utilizing novel combinations (as with the mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor, everolimus, and T-cell costimulation blockade with belatacept) offer potential for enhanced benefits.

Immunosuppression-related neurological disorders in kidney transplantation

A large number of neurological disorders can affect renal transplant recipients, potentially leading to disabling or life-threatening complications. Prevention, early diagnosis and appropriate management of these conditions are critical to avoid irreversible lesions. A pivotal role in the pathogenesis of common post-transplant neurological disorders is played by immunosuppressive therapy. The most frequently administered regimen consists of triple immunosuppression, which comprises a calcineurin inhibitor (CNI), a purine synthesis inhibitor and glucocorticoids. Some of these immunosuppressive drugs may lead to neurological signs and symptoms through direct neurotoxic effects, and all of them may be responsible for the development of tumors or opportunistic infections. In this review, after a brief summary of neurotoxic pathogenetic mechanisms encompassing recent advances in the field, we focus on the clinical presentation of more common and severe immunosuppression-related neurological complications, classifying them by characteristics of urgency and anatomic site. Our goal is to provide a general framework that addresses such clinical issues with a multidisciplinary approach, as these conditions require.

Real-World Administration of Once-Daily MeltDose® Prolonged-Release Tacrolimus (LCPT) Allows for Dose Reduction of Tacrolimus and Stabilizes Graft Function Following Liver Transplantation

The calcineurin inhibitor tacrolimus is included in most immunosuppressive protocols after liver transplantation. This retrospective, observational 24-month study investigated the tolerability of once-daily MeltDose^® prolonged-release tacrolimus (LCPT) after switching from twice-daily immediate-release tacrolimus (IR-Tac) in a real-world cohort of 150 patients with previous liver transplantation. No graft rejection or new safety signals were observed. Only 7.3% of patients discontinued LCPT due to side effects. In the overall patient population, median liver transaminases, total cholesterol, triglycerides, glucose, and HbA_1c remained constant after switching to LCPT. Total cholesterol significantly decreased (p ≤ 0.002) in patients with initially elevated levels (>200 mg/dL). A total of 71.8% of 96 patients maintained a glomerular filtration rate > 60 mL/min/1.73 m² throughout the study, while 44.7% of patients were classified as fast metabolizers and 55.3% as slow metabolizers. Median daily tacrolimus dose could be reduced by 50% in fast metabolizers and by 30% in slow metabolizers, while trough levels were maintained in the target range (4–6 ng/mL). In conclusion, our observational study confirmed previous evidence of good overall tolerability and a favorable outcome for the patients after switching from IR-Tac to LCPT after liver transplantation.

Comparison of the Impact of Pharmacogenetic Variability on the PK of Slow Release and Immediate Release Tacrolimus Formulations

Tacrolimus-modified release formulations allow for once-daily dosing, and adherence is better compared to the twice-daily immediate release formulation. When patients are switched from one formulation to another, variable changes in drug concentrations are observed. Current data suggest that the changes in drug exposure are larger in patients who express the CYP3A5 enzyme (CYP3A5 *1/*3 or *1/*1) compared to nonexpressers (CYP3A5*3/*3). Possibly, these differences are due to the fact that in the upper region of the small intestine CYP3A activity is higher, and that this expression of CYP3A decreases towards the more distal parts of the gut. Modified release formulations may therefore be subject to a less presystemic metabolism. However, the full implications of pharmacogenetic variants affecting the expression and function of drug transporters in the gut wall and of enzymes involved in phase I and phase II metabolism on the different formulations are incompletely understood, and additional studies are required. Conclusions: In all patients in whom the formulation of tacrolimus is changed, drug levels need to be checked to avoid clinically relevant under- or overexposure. In patients with the CYP3A5 expresser genotype, this recommendation is even more important, as changes in drug exposure can be expected.

Effect of Concentration/Dose Ratio in De Novo Kidney Transplant Recipients Receiving LCP-Tacrolimus or Immediate-Release Tacrolimus: Post Hoc Analysis of a Phase 3 Clinical Trial

Background

A previous phase 3 clinical trial in de novo adult kidney transplant recipients (NCT01187953) compared the efficacy and safety of once-daily LCP-tacrolimus (LCPT) and twice-daily immediate-release tacrolimus (IR-Tac). However, whether the rate of tacrolimus metabolism affects outcomes between LCPT and IR-Tac was not examined.

Material/Methods

Patients were initiated on 0.17 mg/kg/day LCPT or 0.1 mg/kg/day IR-Tac, with doses adjusted over time to maintain target therapeutic trough concentrations. This post hoc analysis examined dosing trends, relative efficacy, and safety of LCPT (n=247) and IR-Tac (n=249) in slow, intermediate, and rapid metabolizers as defined by concentration/dose ratios at day 30.

Results

For all metabolizer subgroups, minimum target tacrolimus trough concentrations were obtained more rapidly with LCPT than with IR-Tac. Slow metabolizers were more likely to exceed target trough concentrations with LCPT, while rapid metabolizers were more likely to fall below target trough concentrations with IR-Tac. Regardless of metabolizer status, significant differences were not detected between LCPT and IR-Tac for treatment failure, death, graft failure, biopsy-proven acute rejection, estimated glomerular filtration rate, or other clinical outcomes.

Conclusions

Although within metabolizer subgroups, attainment of target trough concentrations in the first week differed between LCPT and IR-Tac, these results suggest that, regardless of metabolizer phenotype, clinical outcomes do not differ between these formulations when dose adjustments are made.

Clinical trial registration

https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01187953

The Effect of Maintenance Treatment with Twice-Daily or Prolonged Once-Daily Tacrolimus Formulation on Visual Evoked Potentials in Stable Kidney Transplant Recipients

In kidney transplant recipients (KTRs), uraemia-induced central nervous system damage partly subsides, while the long-lasting exposure to tacrolimus may cause pathologic visual evoked potentials (VEP) findings, which have not been investigated yet. Thus, the aim of the present study was to assess the effect of tacrolimus maintenance treatment on bioelectrical function of optic nerves in stable KTRs. Sixty-five stable KTRs were enrolled, including 30 patients treated with twice-daily (Prograf) and 35 patients treated with prolonged once-daily (Advagraf) tacrolimus formulation. In all patients, pattern and flash VEP measurements were performed. Tacrolimus dosing and exposure were also analyzed. Overall, 129 eyes were analyzed. In pattern VEP, both (1°) and (15') latencies of P100 waves were significantly longer, whereas (1°) and (15') amplitudes were lower in the Advagraf group as compared with the Prograf group. Multivariate regression analyses revealed that the use of Advagraf (vs. Prograf) was independently associated with longer (1°) and (15') P100 latencies and lower corresponding amplitudes, whereas log tacrolimus daily dose was only related to amplitudes in a whole study group. In flash VEP, log tacrolimus trough level was associated with negative changes in P2 wave amplitude irrespective of tacrolimus formulation, whereas its association with P2 latency was observed only in the Prograf group. Both the type of tacrolimus formulation and drug exposure influenced the VEP parameters in stable KTRs.

The use of LCP-Tacrolimus (Envarsus XR) in simultaneous pancreas and kidney (SPK) transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Extended release LCP-tacrolimus (LCPT) allows once-daily dosing in transplant recipients. The improved bioavailability may be beneficial for simultaneous pancreas-kidney recipients (SPK).

METHODS

This is a study of 39 SPK recipients on standard immediate-release tacrolimus (IR-TAC, n = 21) or LCPT (n = 18). Coefficient of variability (CV = 100∗standard deviation/mean) was calculated to assess drug levels. Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), tacrolimus and creatinine levels were measured postoperatively.

RESULTS

There was no difference in tacrolimus CV in the IR-TAC and LCPT groups at 1 month or 3 months postoperatively; however, a greater difference was observed at 1 year (41.0 vs. 33.1%; p = 0.19). There were six episodes of acute rejection in the IR-TAC group compared to zero episodes in the LCPT group (p = 0.01). HbA1c was significantly higher in the IR-TAC group compared to LCPT at 3 (5.5 vs. 4.9%, p = 0.01), 6 (5.6 vs. 4.9%, p = 0.01) and 12 months (5.8 vs. 5.1%, p = 0.07).

CONCLUSIONS

Significantly lower rates of rejection were observed in patients receiving LCPT. The once daily dosing may facilitate medication adherence and result in improved long-term outcomes.