Factors contributing to employment patterns after liver transplantation

The financial burden after liver transplantation is significant among commercially insured adults: A large US National Cohort

Liver transplantation (LT) is lifesaving for patients with cirrhosis; however, the resultant financial burden to patients has not been well characterized. We aimed to provide a nationally representative portrayal of patient financial burden after LT. Adult recipients of LT from 2006 to 2021 were identified using IQVIA PharMetrics® Plus for Academics-a large nationally representative claims database of commercially insured Americans. Patient financial liability (ie, what patients owe) was estimated using the difference between allowed and paid costs for adjudicated medical/pharmacy claims. Descriptive statistics were provided stratified by the financial liability group within 1 year after LT. Multivariable logistic regression modeling identified factors associated with high/extreme liability adjusting for covariates. Potential indirect costs of post-LT care were estimated based on hourly wages lost for care. Among 1412 recipients of LT, financial liability was heterogeneous-~3% had no liability and 21% had extreme liability > $10K for 1-year post-LT care; most (69%) paid between $1 and 10K, with 48% having liability >$5K. Factors associated with >$5K liability included older age, insurance/enrollment type, US region, history of HCC, and simultaneous liver-kidney transplant (for liability >$10K). Medication costs comprised ~30% of outpatient financial liability. Potential indirect costs from wages lost were $2,201-$6,073 per person, depending on an hourly wage. In a large national cohort of commercially insured recipients of LT, financial liability was highly variable across sociodemographic and clinical characteristics; nearly 1 out of 2 recipients of LT owed >$5K for 1 year of post-LT care. Transplant programs should help patients anticipate potential costs and identify vulnerable populations who would benefit from enhanced financial counseling.

Long term employment following heart transplantation in the United States

BACKGROUND

Employment is an important metric of post-transplant functional status and the quality of life yet remains poorly described after heart transplant. We sought to characterize the prevalence of employment following heart transplantation and identify patients at risk for post-transplant unemployment.

METHODS

Adults undergoing single-organ heart transplantation (2007-2016) were evaluated using the UNOS database. Univariable analysis was performed after stratifying by employment status at 1-year post-transplant. Fine-Gray competing risk regression was used for risk adjustment. Cox regression evaluated employment status at 1 year with mortality.

RESULTS

Of 10,132 heart transplant recipients who survived to 1 year and had follow-up, 22.0% were employed 1-year post-transplant. Employment rate of survivors increased to 32.9% by year 2. Employed individuals were more likely white (70.8% vs 60.4%, p < 0.01), male (79.6% vs 70.7% p < 0.01), held a job at listing/transplant (37.6% vs 7.6%, p < 0.01), and had private insurance (79.1% vs 49.5%, p < 0.01). Several characteristics were independently associated with employment including age, employment status at time of listing or transplant, race and ethnicity, gender, insurance status, education, and postoperative complications. Of 1,657 (14.0%) patients employed pretransplant, 58% were working at 1-year. Employment at 1year was independently associated with mortality with employed individuals having a 26% decreased risk of mortality.

CONCLUSION

Over 20% of heart transplant patients were employed at 1 year and over 30% at 2 years, while 58% of those working pretransplant had returned to work by 1-year. While the major predictor of post-transplant employment is preoperative employment status, our study highlights the impact of social determinants of health.

Post-liver transplantation patient experience

Given improvements in post-transplant patient and graft survival, there is a growing need to focus on patient experience and health-related quality of life (HRQOL). Though liver transplantation can be life-saving, it can also be associated with significant morbidity and complications. Patient HRQOL improves after transplantation, but it may not improve to that of age-matched cohorts. Understanding patient experience and the factors that contribute to it, including physical and psychological health, immunosuppression and medication adherence, return to employment or school, financial burden, and expectations, helps when thinking creatively about potential interventions to improve HRQOL.

Rates of employment after liver transplant: A nationwide cohort study

BACKGROUND

Employment outcomes after liver transplant (LT) over the past decade have not been described.

METHODS

LT recipients ages 18-65 from 2010-2018 were identified in Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network data. Employment within two years post-transplant was assessed.

RESULTS

Of 35,340 LT recipients, 34.2% were employed post-LT, including 70.4% who were working pre-transplant, compared to only 18.2% not working preLT. Younger age, male sex, educational attainment, and functional status were associated with returning to employment.

CONCLUSION

Returning to employment is an important goal for many LT candidates and recipients, and these findings can be used to guide their expectations.

Financial burden in adults with chronic liver disease: A scoping review

The economic burden of chronic liver disease is rising; however, the financial impact of chronic liver disease on patients and families has been underexplored. We performed a scoping review to identify studies examining financial burden (patient/family health care expenditures), financial distress (material, behavioral, and psychological consequences of financial burden), and financial toxicity (adverse health outcomes of financial distress) experienced by patients with chronic liver disease and their families. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and the Web of Science online databases for articles published since the introduction of the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score for liver transplantation allocation in February 2002 until July 2021. Final searches were conducted between June and July 2021. Studies were included if they examined the prevalence or impact of financial burden or distress among patients with chronic liver disease and/or their caregivers. A total of 19 observational studies met inclusion criteria involving 24,549 patients and 276 caregivers across 5 countries. High rates of financial burden and distress were reported within the study populations, particularly among patients with hepatic encephalopathy, hepatocellular carcinoma, and liver transplantation recipients. Financial burden and distress were associated with increased pre- and posttransplantation health care utilization and poor health-related quality of life as well as caregiver burden, depression, and anxiety. None of the included studies evaluated interventions to alleviate financial burden and distress. Observational evidence supports the finding that financial burden and distress are underrecognized but highly prevalent among patients with chronic liver disease and their caregivers and are associated with poor health outcomes. There is a critical need for interventions to mitigate financial burden and distress and reduce financial toxicity in chronic liver disease care.

County Rankings Have Limited Utility When Predicting Liver Transplant Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Evidence of geographical differences in liver transplantation (LT) outcomes has been proposed as a reason to include community characteristics in risk adjustment of transplant quality metrics. However, consistency and utility of rankings in LT outcomes for counties have not been demonstrated.

AIMS

We sought to evaluate the utility of county rankings (county socioeconomic status (SES) or county health scores (CHS)) on outcomes after LT.

METHODS

Using the United Network for Organ Sharing Registry, adults ≥ 18 years of age undergoing LT between 2002 and 2014 were identified. County-specific 1-year survival was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method for counties with ≥ 5 LT performed during this period. Agreement between high-risk designation by 1-year mortality rate and county ranking was calculated using the Spearman correlation coefficient.

RESULTS

The analysis included 47,769 LT recipients in 1092 counties. County 1-year mortality rates were not correlated with county CHS (Spearman ρ = 0.01, p = 0.694) or county SES (Spearman ρ = - 0.01, p = 0.734). After controlling for individual-level covariates, a statistically significant variability in mortality hazards across counties (p < 0.001) persisted. Although both CHS and SES measures improved the model fit (p = 0.004 and p = 0.048, respectively), an unexplained residual variation in mortality hazard across counties continued.

CONCLUSIONS

There is poor agreement between county rankings on various socioeconomic indicators and LT outcomes. Although there is variability in outcomes across counties, this appears not to be due to county-level socioeconomic indices.

Education and Employment After Lung Transplantation in Adolescents and Young Adults

Pediatric transplant recipients experience barriers to social functioning, including participation in school and work, but our understanding of barriers to these activities is limited by insufficient data collection and standardization. Existing studies rely on cross-sectional surveys of transplant survivors that are subject to survivorship and nonresponse bias, or analyses of large registry data that lack detail on educational progress and work participation. We report our experience using the electronic medical record to retrospectively review work and educational attainment in this population, and identify specific barriers that were encountered and how they were addressed by the patient and care team. We reviewed current literature on post-transplant survey participation and compared questionnaires to our current documentation practice for tracking education and employment progress in the transplant recipient population. Based on this review, we discuss the possibility, barriers, and implications of conducting a standardized assessment to track social participation outcomes of transplantation.

Change in Health Insurance Coverage After Liver Transplantation Can Be Associated with Worse Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Health insurance coverage changes for many patients after liver transplantation, but the implications of this change on long-term outcomes are unclear.

AIMS

To assess post-transplant patient and graft survival according to change in insurance coverage within 1 year of transplantation.

METHODS

We queried the United Network for Organ Sharing for patients between ages 18-64 years undergoing liver transplantation in 2002-2016. Patients surviving > 1 year were categorized by insurance coverage at transplantation and the 1-year transplant anniversary. Multivariable Cox regression characterized the association between coverage pattern and long-term patient or graft survival.

RESULTS

Among 34,487 patients in the analysis, insurance coverage patterns included continuous private coverage (58%), continuous public coverage (29%), private to public transition (8%) and public to private transition (4%). In multivariable analysis of patient survival, continuous public insurance (HR 1.29, CI 1.22, 1.37, p < 0.001), private to public transition (HR 1.17, CI 1.07, 1.28, p < 0.001), and public to private transition (HR 1.14, CI 1.00, 1.29, p = 0.044), were associated with greater mortality hazard, compared to continuous private coverage. After disaggregating public coverage by source, mortality hazard was highest for patients transitioning from private insurance to Medicaid (HR vs. continuous private coverage = 1.32; 95% CI 1.14, 1.52; p < 0.001). Similar differences by insurance category were found for death-censored graft failure.

CONCLUSION

Post-transplant transition to public insurance coverage is associated with higher risk of adverse outcomes when compared to retaining private coverage.

Employment after heart transplantation among adults with congenital heart disease

OBJECTIVE

Adults with congenital heart disease may require heart transplantation for end-stage heart failure. Whereas heart transplantation potentially allows adults with congenital heart disease to resume their usual activities, employment outcomes in this population are unknown. Therefore, we investigated the prevalence and predictors of work participation after heart transplantation for congenital heart disease.

DESIGN

Retrospective review of a prospective registry.

SETTING

United Network for Organ Sharing registry of transplant recipients in the United States.

PATIENTS

Adult recipients of first-time heart transplantation with a primary diagnosis of congenital heart disease, performed between 2004 and 2015.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Employment status reported by transplant centers at required follow-up intervals up to 5 y posttransplant.

RESULTS

Among 470 patients included in the analysis (mean follow-up: 5 ± 3 y), 127 (27%) worked after transplant, 69 (15%) died before beginning or returning to work, and 274 (58%) survived until censoring, but did not participate in paid work. Multivariable competing-risks regression analysis examined characteristics associated with posttransplant employment, accounting for mortality as a competing outcome. In descriptive and multivariable analysis, pretransplant work participation was associated with a greater likelihood of posttransplant employment, while the use of Medicaid insurance at the time of transplant was associated with a significantly lower likelihood of working after transplant (subhazard ratio compared to private insurance: 0.55; 95% confidence interval: 0.32, 0.95; P = .032).

CONCLUSIONS

Employment was rare after heart transplantation for congenital heart disease, and was significantly less common than in the broader population of adults with congenital heart disease. Differences in return to work were primarily related to pretransplant employment and the use of public insurance, rather than clinical characteristics.