Does Industry-Conducted All-Case Surveillance of Newly Approved Oncology Drugs Contribute to the Revision of Package Inserts in Japan?

Postmarketing all-case surveillance trends and contribution to safety measures of drugs approved in Japan: a cross-sectional survey in 1999-2019

BACKGROUND

Postmarketing all-case surveillance (PACS) is a safety monitoring activity predominantly conducted for drugs with few domestic clinical trials, orphan drugs, or anticancer drugs that potentially cause serious adverse events.

AIM

This study comprehensively analyzed drugs in Japan requiring PACS as an approval condition and those implementing PACS-results-based safety measures.

METHOD

We included drugs approved in Japan between 1999 and 2019.

RESULTS

During the 20-year survey, 1871 drugs were approved in Japan, including 277 (14.8%) requiring PACS as an approval prerequisite. The drug number requiring PACS for approval and its ratio to the total approved-drug number is increasing annually. In 2018, the number and percentage of PACS-requiring drugs reached a 37-drug maximum (32.5%). Additionally, among the 277 PACS-requiring drugs, upon examining the results of 87 drugs for which reexamination results had already been obtained, all 87 drugs (31.4%) were found to be in Category 1 which means there is no need to revise drug-approval conditions, indicating that their usefulness is consistent with approval. Furthermore, measures such as revising the package insert and providing information to medical institutions were adopted for 53 drugs, 14 of which had PACS-results-based safety measures.

CONCLUSION

PACS implementation for drug approval will potentially continue increasing. Normally, PACS is not conducted overseas, as it is a safety-monitoring activity exclusive to Japan, and the burden on institutions, such as medical sites and pharmaceutical companies, is heavy. Thus, ensuring a balance between the obtained effect and this burden is imperative.

Real-World Evidence of the Incidence of and Risk Factors for Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus and Hypothyroidism as Immune-Related Adverse Events Associated With Programmed Cell Death-1 Inhibitors

OBJECTIVE

The incidence of type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) and hypothyroidism as immune-related adverse events (irAEs) after programmed cell death-1 inhibitor (PD-1i) administration has not yet been sufficiently evaluated in a real clinical setting. To assess the incidence of T1DM and hypothyroidism among PD-1is and to identify the risk factors associated with hypothyroidism using a large claims database.

METHODS

This cohort study used the Shizuoka Kokuho database in Japan from 2012 to 2018, including approximately 2.2 million people. We enrolled 695 PD-1i-treated patients. T1DM and hypothyroidism as irAEs were identified using International Classification of Diseases 10th Revision and Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical classification codes. Risk factors for hypothyroidism were explored using the multivariable Fine and Gray regression model after adjusting for age group and sex, treating death as a competing risk.

RESULTS

The cumulative incidences of T1DM and hypothyroidism were 0.3% and 8.3%, respectively. We described the detailed onset timing of irAEs in patients with T1DM and hypothyroidism; hypothyroidism was observed evenly within 1 year of the PD-1i prescription. Sex and certain cancer types, such as lung and urothelial cancers, were significantly associated with subdistribution hazard ratio (sHR) (female: sHR, 2.04 [95% CI, 1.20-3.47]; lung cancer: sHR, 0.55 [95% CI, 0.32-0.95]; and urothelial carcinoma: sHR, 2.40 [95% CI, 1.05-5.49]).

CONCLUSION

The incidence of T1DM and hypothyroidism as irAEs and associated risk factors identified in this analysis were comparable to those found in previous studies. The use of a large claims database to detect irAEs, such as T1DM and hypothyroidism, may lead to safer use of PD-1is.

Real-world use of temsirolimus in Japanese patients with unresectable or metastatic renal cell carcinoma: recent consideration based on the results of a post-marketing, all-case surveillance study

OBJECTIVE

A prospective, observational, post-marketing surveillance was conducted to assess the safety and effectiveness of temsirolimus in patients with renal cell carcinoma in Japan.

METHODS

Patients prescribed temsirolimus for advanced renal cell carcinoma were registered and received temsirolimus (25 mg weekly, intravenous infusion for 30-60 minutes) in routine clinical settings (observation period: 96 weeks).

RESULTS

Among 1001 patients included in the safety analysis data set (median age, 65.0 years; men, 74.8%; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 or 1, 69.6%), 778 (77.7%) reported adverse drug reactions. The most common (≥10%) all-grade adverse drug reactions were stomatitis (26.7%), interstitial lung disease (17.3%) and platelet count decreased (11.1%). The incidence rate of grade ≥3 interstitial lung disease was 4.5%. The onset of interstitial lung disease was more frequent after 4-8 weeks of treatment or in patients with lower Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (21.6% for score 0 vs 8.3% for score 4, P < 0.001). Among 654 patients in the effectiveness analysis data set, the response and clinical benefit rates were 6.7% (95% confidence interval 4.9-8.9) and 53.2% (95% confidence interval 49.3-57.1), respectively. The median progression-free survival was 18.3 weeks (95% confidence interval 16.9-21.1).

CONCLUSIONS

The safety and effectiveness profile of temsirolimus observed in this study was similar to that observed in the multinational phase 3 study. The results are generalizable to the real-world scenario at the time of this research, and safety and effectiveness of temsirolimus as a subsequent anticancer therapy for renal cell carcinoma warrants further investigation. (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01210482, NCT01420601).