Target to Treatment: a charge to develop biomarkers of response and tolerability in child and adolescent psychiatry

Development of a pharmacodynamic biomarker of opioid antagonism in adolescents with eating disorders: Study protocol for the naltrexone neuroimaging randomized controlled trial (NN-RCT)

Eating disorders (ED) affect 5 % of youth, are associated with reward system alterations, and lead to substantial morbidity. Naltrexone, an opioid antagonist, is used to treat ED behaviors such as binge eating and purging. However, not all patients respond, and the optimal dose is unknown. Neuroimaging may serve as a tool to detect drug response in the brain, acting as a pharmacodynamic biomarker to support therapeutic optimization. Currently, no pharmacodynamic biomarkers for psychopharmacology exist. Building on pilot work, we present the protocol for a randomized controlled trial to validate neuroimaging as a pharmacodynamic biomarker of opioid antagonism in adolescents with ED. Youth aged 13-21 years with binge/purge ED are randomized to receive a single dose of oral naltrexone and placebo in a double-blind using a crossover design with an interdose interval ≥ 2 weeks. Task-based functional neuroimaging detects reward pathway modulation 2 h post-dose. Blood and urine are collected over a model-informed time course. Response (primary outcome) is defined as naltrexone-related blood oxygenation-level dependent signal change (Δ%BOLD) in a priori reward regions of interest and secondary exposure outcomes are naltrexone Cmax and AUC0-∞. Cohen's d will determine Δ%BOLD effect size, and an exposure-response model will identify target exposure to guide future dosing. This study addresses a critical knowledge gap by developing a non-invasive pharmacodynamic biomarker for youth with ED, with future applications in quantitative pharmacology, precision dosing, and the development of novel therapeutics. NCT05509257.

Neuroimaging as a Tool for Advancing Pediatric Psychopharmacology

Neuroimaging, specifically magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS), and positron emission tomography (PET), plays an important role in improving the therapeutic landscape of pediatric neuropsychopharmacology by detecting target engagement, pathway modulation, and disease-related changes in the brain. This review provides a comprehensive update on the application of neuroimaging to detect neural effects of psychotropic medication in pediatrics. Additionally, we discuss opportunities and challenges for expanding the use of neuroimaging to advance pediatric neuropsychopharmacology. PubMed and Embase were searched for studies published between 2012 and 2024 reporting neural effects of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) medications (e.g., methylphenidate, amphetamine, atomoxetine, guanfacine), selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (e.g., fluoxetine, escitalopram, sertraline), serotonin/norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (e.g., duloxetine, venlafaxine), second-generation antipsychotics (e.g., aripiprazole, olanzapine, risperidone, quetiapine, ziprasidone), and others (e.g., lithium, carbamazepine, lamotrigine, ketamine, naltrexone) used to treat pediatric psychiatric conditions. Of the studies identified (N = 57 in 3314 pediatric participants), most (86%, total participants n = 3045) used MRI to detect functional pathway modulation or anatomical changes. Fewer studies (14%, total participants n = 269) used MRS to understand neurochemical modulation. No studies used PET. Studies that included healthy controls detected normalization of disease-altered pathways following treatment. Studies that focused on affected youth detected neuromodulation following single-dose and ongoing treatment. Neuroimaging is positioned to serve as a biomarker capable of demonstrating acute brain modulation, predicting clinical response, and monitoring disease, yet biomarker validation requires further work. Neuroimaging is also well suited to fill the notable knowledge gap of long-term neuromodulatory effects of psychotropic medications in the context of ongoing brain development in children and adolescents. Future studies can leverage advancements in neuroimaging technology, acquisition, and analysis to fill these gaps and accelerate the discovery of novel therapeutics, leading to more effective prescribing and ensuring faster recovery.

Escitalopram and Sertraline Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis in Pediatric Patients

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Escitalopram and sertraline are commonly prescribed for anxiety and depressive disorders in children and adolescents. The pharmacokinetics (PK) of these medications have been evaluated in adults and demonstrate extensive variability, but studies in pediatric patients are limited. Therefore, we performed a population PK analysis for escitalopram and sertraline in children and adolescents to characterize the effects of demographic, clinical, and pharmacogenetic factors on drug exposure.

METHODS

A PK dataset was generated by extracting data from the electronic health record and opportunistic sampling of escitalopram- and sertraline-treated psychiatrically hospitalized pediatric patients aged 5-18 years. A population PK analysis of escitalopram and sertraline was performed using NONMEM. Concentration-time profiles were simulated using MwPharm++ to evaluate how covariates included in the final models influence medication exposure and compared to adult therapeutic reference ranges.

RESULTS

The final escitalopram cohort consisted of 315 samples from 288 patients, and the sertraline cohort consisted of 265 samples from 255 patients. A one-compartment model with a proportional residual error model best described the data for both medications. For escitalopram, CYP2C19 phenotype and concomitant CYP2C19 inhibitors affected apparent clearance (CL/F), and normalizing CL/F and apparent volume of distribution (V/F) to body surface area (BSA) improved estimations. The final escitalopram model estimated CL/F and V/F at 14.2 L/h/1.73 m2 and 428 L/1.73 m2, respectively. For sertraline, CYP2C19 phenotype and concomitant CYP2C19 inhibitors influenced CL/F, and empirical allometric scaling of patient body weight on CL/F and V/F was significant. The final sertraline model estimated CL/F and V/F at 124 L/h/70 kg and 4320 L/70 kg, respectively. Normalized trough concentrations (Ctrough) for CYP2C19 poor metabolizers taking escitalopram were 3.98-fold higher compared to normal metabolizers (151.1 ng/mL vs 38.0 ng/mL, p < 0.0001), and normalized Ctrough for CYP2C19 poor metabolizers taking sertraline were 3.23-fold higher compared to normal, rapid, and ultrarapid metabolizers combined (121.7 ng/mL vs 37.68 ng/mL, p < 0.0001). Escitalopram- and sertraline-treated poor metabolizers may benefit from a dose reduction of 50-75% and 25-50%, respectively, to normalize exposure to other phenotypes.

CONCLUSION

To our knowledge, this is the largest population PK analysis of escitalopram and sertraline in pediatric patients. Significant PK variability for both medications was observed and was largely explained by CYP2C19 phenotype. Slower CYP2C19 metabolizers taking escitalopram or sertraline may benefit from dose reductions given increased exposure.

Potential biomarker of brain response to opioid antagonism in adolescents with eating disorders: a pilot study

Background

Eating Disorders (ED) affect up to 5% of youth and are associated with reward system alterations and compulsive behaviors. Naltrexone, an opioid antagonist, is used to treat ED behaviors such as binge eating and/or purging. The presumed mechanism of action is blockade of reward activation; however, not all patients respond, and the optimal dose is unknown. Developing a tool to detect objective drug response in the brain will facilitate drug development and therapeutic optimization. This pilot study evaluated neuroimaging as a pharmacodynamic biomarker of opioid antagonism in adolescents with ED.

Methods

Youth aged 13-21 with binge/purge ED completed functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) pre- and post-oral naltrexone. fMRI detected blood oxygenation-level dependent (BOLD) signal at rest and during two reward probes (monetary incentive delay, MID, and passive food view, PFV) in predefined regions of interest associated with reward and inhibitory control. Effect sizes for Δ%BOLD (post-naltrexone vs. baseline) were estimated using linear mixed effects modeling.

Results

In 12 youth (16-21 years, 92% female), BOLD signal changes were detected following naltrexone in the nucleus accumbens during PFV (Δ%BOLD -0.08 ± 0.03; Cohen's d -1.06, p = 0.048) and anterior cingulate cortex during MID (Δ%BOLD 0.06 ± 0.03; Cohen's d 1.25, p = 0.086).

Conclusion

fMRI detected acute reward pathway modulation in this small sample of adolescents with binge/purge ED. If validated in future, larger trials, task-based Δ%BOLD detected by fMRI may serve as a pharmacodynamic biomarker of opioid antagonism to facilitate the development of novel therapeutics targeting the reward pathway, enable quantitative pharmacology trials, and inform drug dosing.

Clinical trial registration

https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04935931, NCT#04935931.

Executive Functioning in Pediatric Anxiety and Its Relationship to Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor Treatment Response: A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial

Objective: To characterize executive function in adolescents with generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) and its relationship to treatment. Methods: Using data from a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of escitalopram in adolescents (N = 51) 12-17 years of age with GAD, we used the self-report version of the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF-SR) to assess executive function, at baseline, and examined its relationship to treatment response as measured by the Pediatric Anxiety Rating Scale (PARS). Results: For all baseline subscores of the BRIEF-SR, T-scores were significantly elevated in adolescents with GAD compared to an age- and sex-matched normative healthy sample. In escitalopram-treated patients, baseline BRIEF-SR scores for Emotional Control (β = 0.256, 95% credibility interval [CrI]: 0.367 to 0.146, p < 0.001), Working Memory (β = 0.204, CrI: 0.2952 to 0.1134, p < 0.001), Planning/Organizing (β = -0.223, CrI: -0.1021 to -0.3436, p = 0.004), and Task Completion (β = -0.152, CrI: 0.075 to 0.228, p = 0.002) predicted the trajectory of improvement in PARS score over the 8-week trial. For youth who received placebo, only the Inhibit score was significantly, but weakly, associated with response trajectory (β = -0.081, CrI: -0.0167 to -0.1461, p = 0.015). For adolescents who had clinically significant impairment in Emotional Control, Working Memory, Planning/Organizing, and Task Completion (i.e., T-score >65), the trajectory of improvement significantly differed from patients without scores in the clinically significant range. Conclusions: Taken together, these findings point to the potential value of assessing executive function in youth with anxiety disorders as one strategy for guiding treatment selection. These data suggest that executive function may predict treatment response to psychopharmacologic treatment and point to numerous avenues for further personalizing treatment.