Use of family disability service by families with young children with disabilities

Challenges and recommendations for advancing respite care for families of children and youth with special health care needs: A qualitative exploration

INTRODUCTION

Caring for children and youth with special health care needs (CYSHCN) is a significant undertaking for families. While respite care is intended to address this burden, demand continues to exceed supply. Exploring the perspectives of respite service providers (SPs) and stakeholders (SKs) provides unique insight into families' needs and respite care systems.

METHODS

We conducted semistructured interviews with 41 respite care SPs and SKs across four Canadian provinces to ascertain perspectives on current and ideal respite care for families of CYSHCN. The analysis included delineating units of meaning from the data, clustering units of meaning to form thematic statements and extracting themes. The second-level analysis involved applying themes and subthemes to cross-functional process maps.

FINDINGS

Participants noted the critical, but sometimes absent role of Community Service Workers, who have the ability to support families accessing and navigating respite care systems. SPs and SKs identified current respite systems as operating in crisis mode. New findings suggest an ideal respite care system would incorporate advocacy for families, empower families and value CYSHCN, their families and respite workers.

CONCLUSION

The evidence of unmet respite care needs of families of CYSHCN across Canada has long been available. Our findings identifying respite system challenges and solutions can be used by funders and policymakers for planning and enhancing resources, and by healthcare professionals, respite care providers and SKs to understand barriers and take action to improve respite outcomes to meet the respite needs of all families and CYSHCN.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

The research team is composed of patients, researchers, clinicians and decision-makers along with our Family Advisory Committee (FAC) composed of members of families of CYSHNC. The FAC was formed and met regularly with research team members, knowledge users and collaborators throughout the study to provide input on design, review themes and ensure findings are translated and disseminated in a meaningful way.

Pan-Canadian caregiver experiences in accessing government disability programs: A mixed methods study

BACKGROUND

At present, little is known about the factors that contribute to the relatively low uptake of government-funded disability programs in Canada.

AIM

Understand how parents/caregivers of Canadian youth with neurodevelopmental disability (NDD) experience the process of applying for and accessing disability programs.

METHODS AND PROCEDURES

This mixed methods sequential explanatory study utilized two phases: an online survey (quantitative), followed by semi-structured interviews (qualitative). The quantitative phase gathered sociodemographic information and preliminary information about participant experiences applying for and accessing programs. The qualitative phase provided greater depth by asking participants to describe barriers and facilitators to program access.

OUTCOMES AND RESULTS

499 participants completed the online survey and 81 participants completed an interview. Analysis of survey data revealed that many participants are not accessing disability programs and experience difficulty when applying. Regression analyses revealed that factors relating to the process of applying and applicant/family attributes are significantly associated with program access. Inductive thematic analysis of interview data revealed four barriers and three facilitators to access. Integration of findings provided an overview of the multi-faceted journey to program access.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

The results of this study highlight policy changes that are needed to ensure disability programs adequately support Canadian families.

The transition to adult income supports for youth that received special education in British Columbia, Canada: A cohort study

Youth in special education have complex needs that are supported across multiple systems. Our research investigates the use of adult income assistance, as one structure that supports youth as they transition to adulthood. We created a cohort of youth (5-22 years old) using linked administrative data from British Columbia government ministries from 1996 to 2018. Youth were grouped by their special education funding (most to least; Level 1, Level 2, Level 3, Unfunded, and no special education). We investigated (1) youth characteristics and service use patterns, (2) which youth used income supports after the child-to-adult transition (19-22 years old), and what youth characteristics and service use patterns were associated with use, and (3) how much income support they used (CAD$). Of 174,527 youth, 254 (0.1%) were Level 1, 6020 (3.4%) were Level 2, 4409 (2.5%) were Level 3, 21,232 (12.2%) were Unfunded, and 142,612 (81.7%) were not in special education. Youth assigned higher funding levels, compared to lower levels, generally had increased service use, and in the transition to adult services were more likely to use income supports, and received more income support. An important exception was youth with serious behavioural/mental health special education funding (Level 3), who had increased service use for their level of funding, but received less income support due to a reliance on Temporary versus Disability Assistance. Youth that received an accredited diploma were less likely to use income supports. Factors related to the use of income supports are further described. This study highlights differences in access to income support when youth transition to adult services and considerations around equitable access to support.

Income assistance use among young adults who were in British Columbia special education: A longitudinal cohort study

BACKGROUND

Persons with disability (PWD) experience disproportionately high poverty rates in Canada. This trend is apparent especially among youth compared to those who develop disabilities later in life. PWD in poverty have additional needs that increase barriers to full participation in society and translate to higher basic costs for daily living. Despite the existence of income assistance programs in Canada to mitigate income inequalities faced by PWDs, access to these programs can be limited.

OBJECTIVE

To describe use of income assistance for young adults with disability in British Columbia for the development of potential approaches to improve realized access to these programs.

METHODS

We conducted a population-based retrospective cohort study using British Columbia linked administrative data. We described differences in income assistance use among PWD by the level of special education funding received during primary school education (from most to least; Level 1, Level 2, Level 3, Unfunded, and no special education) and family composition. We also provided longitudinal patterns of income assistance use.

RESULTS

Of 218,324 young adults, 88% received no special education, 0.1% used Level One, 1.6% used Level Two, 2.9% used Level Three, and 7.1% used Unfunded special education coding. Young adults with Level One special education funding had the highest rates of hospitalizations and continuing care, with no hospitalization due to homelessness. Those with Level Three special education coding had higher rates of hospitalization and hospitalization due to homelessness than Level Two young adults. When transitioning to adulthood initially, Level One and Two funded individuals used relatively more disability income assistance than individuals from the other funding levels. Nearly all BCEA users with higher funded special education codes used this disability-specific program, while lesser funded special education codes used the Temporary Assistance more frequently, for a longer duration and were more likely to be persistent Temporary Assistance users.

CONCLUSIONS

Sustainable and reliable access to income assistance programs remains an issue across the heterogeneity of needs faced by young adults with disability.

Factors associated with Multidisciplinary Healthcare Resource Utilization Following Discharge from Pediatric Rehabilitation: A One-year Follow-up Study

AIMS

To characterize multidisciplinary healthcare resource utilization (mHRU), including physical, occupational, speech and psychosocial therapy one-year following discharge from prolonged inpatient and outpatient pediatric rehabilitation in Israel and to identify factors associated with long-term mHRU.

METHODS

According to Andersen's model of health service use, predisposing (child's age and sex), enabling (district of origin, income level, parental education, insurance) and need factors (injury type, functional status, family psychosocial risk) were collected from parents of children hospitalized for >1 month in a large rehabilitation hospital in Israel, and phone interviews were held 3-months (T1), 6-months (T2) and 12-months (T3) post-discharge. The effect of time and the role of various factors on mHRU, operationalized as number of therapy sessions in the previous 2 weeks, were evaluated.

RESULTS

Sixty-one families participated at T1 and T2, and 46 participated at T3. HRU was similar over time. Predisposing factors (age) and need factors (functional status and psychosocial risk) were associated with specific disciplines of mHRU, but enabling factors were not.

CONCLUSIONS

mHRU is high and stable 12-months post-discharge. The lack of impact of enabling factors on mHRU, and the discipline-specific impact of predisposing and need factors, support equity of care provision for children following prolonged rehabilitation.

Cross-ministry data on service use and limitations faced by children in special education

BACKGROUND

Children with disabilities often face limitations that cross support sectors.

OBJECTIVE

Our aim was to measure cross-ministry service use, outcomes, and functional limitations faced by children who qualified for special education.

METHODS

We used longitudinal British Columbia ministry data linked to children (0-18y) registered in K-12 education. Children were grouped by special education funding (most to least; Level 1, Level 2, Level 3, Unfunded, and no special education), and related to 1) service use patterns, 2) the age they first used disability services, and 3) functional limitations reported in health visits. We also reported how length of special education use related to disability service use.

RESULTS

Of 111,274 children, 154(0.1%) were Level 1, 4427(4.0%) Level 2, 2897(2.6%) Level 3, 13472(12.1%) Unfunded, and 90324(81.2%) not in special education. Children with higher funding levels, compared to lower levels of funding, generally were more likely to experience poorer outcomes, have functional limitations, have service needs, and receive early support. One exception was children with serious behavioural/mental health special education coding, which had poorer outcomes for their level of funding. Children received child disability supports early (about half of users started by 4y), but use was mostly limited to those with many years (9+years) of funded special education (70.7% of the all users) and biased to certain special education codes (i.e., Level 1, severe intellectual disability, and autism).

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides evidence of the long-term, diverse needs of children in special education and may be used to inform decisions surrounding their support.