1
|
Prahalad P, Scheinker D, Desai M, Ding VY, Bishop FK, Lee MY, Ferstad J, Zaharieva DP, Addala A, Johari R, Hood K, Maahs DM. Equitable implementation of a precision digital health program for glucose management in individuals with newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes. Nat Med 2024; 30:2067-2075. [PMID: 38702523 DOI: 10.1038/s41591-024-02975-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2023] [Accepted: 04/03/2024] [Indexed: 05/06/2024]
Abstract
Few young people with type 1 diabetes (T1D) meet glucose targets. Continuous glucose monitoring improves glycemia, but access is not equitable. We prospectively assessed the impact of a systematic and equitable digital-health-team-based care program implementing tighter glucose targets (HbA1c < 7%), early technology use (continuous glucose monitoring starts <1 month after diagnosis) and remote patient monitoring on glycemia in young people with newly diagnosed T1D enrolled in the Teamwork, Targets, Technology, and Tight Control (4T Study 1). Primary outcome was HbA1c change from 4 to 12 months after diagnosis; the secondary outcome was achieving the HbA1c targets. The 4T Study 1 cohort (36.8% Hispanic and 35.3% publicly insured) had a mean HbA1c of 6.58%, 64% with HbA1c < 7% and mean time in the range (70-180 mg dl-1) of 68% at 1 year after diagnosis. Clinical implementation of the 4T Study 1 met the prespecified primary outcome and improved glycemia without unexpected serious adverse events. The strategies in the 4T Study 1 can be used to implement systematic and equitable care for individuals with T1D and translate to care for other chronic diseases. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT04336969 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Priya Prahalad
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
- Stanford Diabetes Research Center, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
| | - David Scheinker
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
- Stanford Diabetes Research Center, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
- Department of Management Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
- Clinical Excellence Research Center, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Manisha Desai
- Department of Medicine, Quantitative Sciences Unit, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Victoria Y Ding
- Department of Medicine, Quantitative Sciences Unit, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Franziska K Bishop
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
- Stanford Diabetes Research Center, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Ming Yeh Lee
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Johannes Ferstad
- Department of Management Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Dessi P Zaharieva
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Ananta Addala
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
- Stanford Diabetes Research Center, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Ramesh Johari
- Stanford Diabetes Research Center, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
- Department of Management Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Korey Hood
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
- Stanford Diabetes Research Center, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - David M Maahs
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
- Stanford Diabetes Research Center, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
- Department of Health Research and Policy (Epidemiology), Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Leverenz JC, Leverenz B, Prahalad P, Bishop FK, Sagan P, Martinez-Singh A, Conrad B, Chmielewski A, Senaldi J, Scheinker D, Maahs DM. Role and Perspective of Certified Diabetes Care and Education Specialists in the Development of the 4T Program. Diabetes Spectr 2024; 37:153-159. [PMID: 38756427 PMCID: PMC11093765 DOI: 10.2337/ds23-0010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/18/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Jeannine C. Leverenz
- Lucile Packard Children’s Hospital, Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, Palo Alto, CA
| | - Brianna Leverenz
- Stritch School of Medicine, Loyola University Chicago, Maywood, IL
| | - Priya Prahalad
- Lucile Packard Children’s Hospital, Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, Palo Alto, CA
- Division of Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University, School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
- Stanford Diabetes Research Center, Stanford, CA
| | - Franziska K. Bishop
- Division of Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University, School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
| | - Piper Sagan
- Lucile Packard Children’s Hospital, Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, Palo Alto, CA
| | - Anjoli Martinez-Singh
- Lucile Packard Children’s Hospital, Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, Palo Alto, CA
| | - Barry Conrad
- Lucile Packard Children’s Hospital, Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, Palo Alto, CA
| | - Annette Chmielewski
- Lucile Packard Children’s Hospital, Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, Palo Alto, CA
| | - Julianne Senaldi
- Lucile Packard Children’s Hospital, Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, Palo Alto, CA
| | - David Scheinker
- Division of Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University, School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
| | - David M. Maahs
- Lucile Packard Children’s Hospital, Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, Palo Alto, CA
- Division of Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University, School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
- Stanford Diabetes Research Center, Stanford, CA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
ElSayed NA, Aleppo G, Bannuru RR, Bruemmer D, Collins BS, Ekhlaspour L, Hilliard ME, Johnson EL, Khunti K, Lingvay I, Matfin G, McCoy RG, Perry ML, Pilla SJ, Polsky S, Prahalad P, Pratley RE, Segal AR, Seley JJ, Stanton RC, Gabbay RA. 7. Diabetes Technology: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2024. Diabetes Care 2024; 47:S126-S144. [PMID: 38078575 PMCID: PMC10725813 DOI: 10.2337/dc24-s007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2023]
Abstract
The American Diabetes Association (ADA) "Standards of Care in Diabetes" includes the ADA's current clinical practice recommendations and is intended to provide the components of diabetes care, general treatment goals and guidelines, and tools to evaluate quality of care. Members of the ADA Professional Practice Committee, an interprofessional expert committee, are responsible for updating the Standards of Care annually, or more frequently as warranted. For a detailed description of ADA standards, statements, and reports, as well as the evidence-grading system for ADA's clinical practice recommendations and a full list of Professional Practice Committee members, please refer to Introduction and Methodology. Readers who wish to comment on the Standards of Care are invited to do so at professional.diabetes.org/SOC.
Collapse
|
4
|
Tanenbaum ML, Addala A, Hanes S, Ritter V, Bishop FK, Cortes AL, Pang E, Hood KK, Maahs DM, Zaharieva DP. "It changed everything we do": A mixed methods study of youth and parent experiences with a pilot exercise education intervention following new diagnosis of type 1 diabetes. J Diabetes Complications 2024; 38:108651. [PMID: 38043358 PMCID: PMC10843536 DOI: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2023.108651] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2023] [Revised: 11/06/2023] [Accepted: 11/19/2023] [Indexed: 12/05/2023]
Abstract
AIMS This pilot study delivered a comprehensive exercise education intervention to youth with new-onset type 1 diabetes (T1D) and their parents to increase knowledge and confidence with physical activity (PA) shortly after diagnosis. METHODS Youth initiated continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) and PA trackers within 1 month of diagnosis. Youth and their parents received the 4-session intervention over 12 months. Participants completed self-report questionnaires at baseline, 6- and 12-months. Surveys were analyzed using linear mixed effects models. Semi-structured interviews and focus groups explored experiences with the exercise education intervention. Groups and interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using content analysis. RESULTS A total of 16 parents (aged 46 ± 7 years; 88 % female; 67 % non-Hispanic White) and 17 youth (aged 14 ± 2 years; 41 % female; 65 % non-Hispanic White) participated. Worry about hypoglycemia did not worsen throughout the study duration. Parents and youth reported increased knowledge and confidence in managing T1D safely and preventing hypoglycemia during PA following receiving the tailored exercise education intervention. CONCLUSION This study assessed a novel structured exercise education program for youth and their parents shortly following T1D diagnosis. These results support the broad translation and acceptability of a structured exercise education program in new-onset T1D.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Molly L Tanenbaum
- Division of Endocrinology, Gerontology, & Metabolism, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA; Stanford Diabetes Research Center, Stanford, CA, USA; Division of Endocrinology and Diabetes, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
| | - Ananta Addala
- Division of Endocrinology and Diabetes, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
| | - Sarah Hanes
- Division of Endocrinology and Diabetes, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
| | - Victor Ritter
- Department of Medicine, Division of Biomedical Informatics Research, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
| | - Franziska K Bishop
- Division of Endocrinology and Diabetes, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
| | - Ana L Cortes
- Division of Endocrinology and Diabetes, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
| | - Erica Pang
- Division of Endocrinology and Diabetes, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
| | - Korey K Hood
- Stanford Diabetes Research Center, Stanford, CA, USA; Division of Endocrinology and Diabetes, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
| | - David M Maahs
- Stanford Diabetes Research Center, Stanford, CA, USA; Division of Endocrinology and Diabetes, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
| | - Dessi P Zaharieva
- Division of Endocrinology and Diabetes, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Prahalad P, Maahs DM. Roadmap to Continuous Glucose Monitoring Adoption and Improved Outcomes in Endocrinology: The 4T (Teamwork, Targets, Technology, and Tight Control) Program. Diabetes Spectr 2023; 36:299-305. [PMID: 37982062 PMCID: PMC10654131 DOI: 10.2337/dsi23-0003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2023]
Abstract
Glucose monitoring is essential for the management of type 1 diabetes and has evolved from urine glucose monitoring in the early 1900s to home blood glucose monitoring in the 1980s to continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) today. Youth with type 1 diabetes struggle to meet A1C goals; however, CGM is associated with improved A1C in these youth and is recommended as a standard of care by diabetes professional organizations. Despite their utility, expanding uptake of CGM systems has been challenging, especially in minoritized communities. The 4T (Teamwork, Targets, Technology, and Tight Control) program was developed using a team-based approach to set consistent glycemic targets and equitably initiate CGM and remote patient monitoring in all youth with new-onset type 1 diabetes. In the pilot 4T study, youth in the 4T cohort had a 0.5% improvement in A1C 12 months after diabetes diagnosis compared with those in the historical cohort. The 4T program can serve as a roadmap for other multidisciplinary pediatric type 1 diabetes clinics to increase CGM adoption and improve glycemic outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Priya Prahalad
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
- Stanford Diabetes Research Center, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | - David M. Maahs
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
- Stanford Diabetes Research Center, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
- Department of Health Research and Policy (Epidemiology), Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Prahalad P, Hardison H, Odugbesan O, Lyons S, Alwazeer M, Neyman A, Miyazaki B, Cossen K, Hsieh S, Eng D, Roberts A, Clements MA, Ebekozien O. Benchmarking Diabetes Technology Use Among 21 U.S. Pediatric Diabetes Centers. Clin Diabetes 2023; 42:27-33. [PMID: 38230344 PMCID: PMC10788667 DOI: 10.2337/cd23-0052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/18/2024]
Abstract
The American Diabetes Association's Standards of Care in Diabetes recommends the use of diabetes technology such as continuous glucose monitoring systems and insulin pumps for people living with type 1 diabetes. Unfortunately, there are multiple barriers to uptake of these devices, including local diabetes center practices. This study aimed to examine overall change and center-to-center variation in uptake of diabetes technology across 21 pediatric centers in the T1D Exchange Quality Improvement Collaborative. It found an overall increase in diabetes technology use for most centers from 2021 to 2022 with significant variation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Priya Prahalad
- Stanford Children’s Health, Lucile Packard Children’s Hospital, Stanford, CA
| | | | | | - Sarah Lyons
- Baylor College of Medicine/Texas Children’s Hospital, Houston, TX
| | | | - Anna Neyman
- UH Rainbow Babies & Children’s Hospital, Cleveland, OH
| | | | | | - Susan Hsieh
- Cook Children’s, Endocrinology, Fort Worth, TX
| | - Donna Eng
- Pediatric Endocrinology, Spectrum Health, Helen DeVos Children’s Hospital, Grand Rapids, MI
| | | | | | - Osagie Ebekozien
- T1D Exchange, Boston, MA
- University of Mississippi School of Population Health, Jackson, MS
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Tanenbaum ML, Commissariat PV. Experience with burdens of diabetes device use that affect uptake and optimal use in people with type 1 diabetes. Endocr Connect 2023; 12:e230193. [PMID: 37522857 PMCID: PMC10503226 DOI: 10.1530/ec-23-0193] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2023] [Accepted: 07/31/2023] [Indexed: 08/01/2023]
Abstract
Diabetes technology continues to advance, with more individuals with type 1 diabetes (T1D) adopting insulin pumps, continuous glucose monitoring (CGM), and automated insulin delivery (AID) systems that integrate real-time glucose data with an algorithm to assist with insulin dosing decisions. These technologies are linked with benefits to glycemic outcomes (e.g. increased time in target range), diabetes management behaviors, and quality of life. However, current devices and systems are not without barriers and hassles for the user. The intent of this review is to describe the personal challenges and reactions that users experience when interacting with current diabetes technologies, which can affect their acceptance and motivation to engage with their devices. This review will discuss user experiences and strategies to address three main areas: (i) the emotional burden of utilizing a wearable device; (ii) the perceived and experienced negative social consequences of device use; and (iii) the practical challenges of wearing devices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Molly L Tanenbaum
- Division of Endocrinology, Gerontology, and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Persis V Commissariat
- Section on Clinical, Behavioral, and Outcomes Research, Joslin Diabetes Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Chang A, Gao MZ, Ferstad JO, Dupenloup P, Zaharieva DP, Maahs DM, Prahalad P, Johari R, Scheinker D. A quantitative model to ensure capacity sufficient for timely access to care in a remote patient monitoring program. Endocrinol Diabetes Metab 2023; 6:e435. [PMID: 37345227 PMCID: PMC10495556 DOI: 10.1002/edm2.435] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2023] [Revised: 05/31/2023] [Accepted: 06/03/2023] [Indexed: 06/23/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Algorithm-enabled remote patient monitoring (RPM) programs pose novel operational challenges. For clinics developing and deploying such programs, no standardized model is available to ensure capacity sufficient for timely access to care. We developed a flexible model and interactive dashboard of capacity planning for whole-population RPM-based care for T1D. METHODS Data were gathered from a weekly RPM program for 277 paediatric patients with T1D at a paediatric academic medical centre. Through the analysis of 2 years of observational operational data and iterative interviews with the care team, we identified the primary operational, population, and workforce metrics that drive demand for care providers. Based on these metrics, an interactive model was designed to facilitate capacity planning and deployed as a dashboard. RESULTS The primary population-level drivers of demand are the number of patients in the program, the rate at which patients enrol and graduate from the program, and the average frequency at which patients require a review of their data. The primary modifiable clinic-level drivers of capacity are the number of care providers, the time required to review patient data and contact a patient, and the number of hours each provider allocates to the program each week. At the institution studied, the model identified a variety of practical operational approaches to better match the demand for patient care. CONCLUSION We designed a generalizable, systematic model for capacity planning for a paediatric endocrinology clinic providing RPM for T1D. We deployed this model as an interactive dashboard and used it to facilitate expansion of a novel care program (4 T Study) for newly diagnosed patients with T1D. This model may facilitate the systematic design of RPM-based care programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annie Chang
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiNew YorkNew YorkUSA
- Department of Management Science and EngineeringStanford UniversityStanfordCaliforniaUSA
| | - Michael Z. Gao
- Department of Management Science and EngineeringStanford UniversityStanfordCaliforniaUSA
| | - Johannes O. Ferstad
- Department of Management Science and EngineeringStanford UniversityStanfordCaliforniaUSA
| | - Paul Dupenloup
- Department of Management Science and EngineeringStanford UniversityStanfordCaliforniaUSA
| | - Dessi P. Zaharieva
- Department of Paediatric, Division of Paediatric EndocrinologyStanford UniversityStanfordCaliforniaUSA
| | - David M. Maahs
- Department of Paediatric, Division of Paediatric EndocrinologyStanford UniversityStanfordCaliforniaUSA
- Stanford Diabetes Research CentreStanford UniversityStanfordCaliforniaUSA
| | - Priya Prahalad
- Department of Paediatric, Division of Paediatric EndocrinologyStanford UniversityStanfordCaliforniaUSA
| | - Ramesh Johari
- Department of Management Science and EngineeringStanford UniversityStanfordCaliforniaUSA
- Stanford Diabetes Research CentreStanford UniversityStanfordCaliforniaUSA
| | - David Scheinker
- Department of Management Science and EngineeringStanford UniversityStanfordCaliforniaUSA
- Department of Paediatric, Division of Paediatric EndocrinologyStanford UniversityStanfordCaliforniaUSA
- Stanford Diabetes Research CentreStanford UniversityStanfordCaliforniaUSA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Tremblay ES, Bernique A, Garvey K, Astley CM. A Retrospective Cohort Study of Racial/Ethnic and Socioeconomic Disparities in Initiation and Meaningful Use of Continuous Glucose Monitoring among Youth With Type 1 Diabetes. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2023:19322968231183985. [PMID: 37394962 DOI: 10.1177/19322968231183985] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Continuous glucose monitor (CGM) use improves type 1 diabetes (T1D) outcomes, yet children from diverse backgrounds and on public insurance have worse outcomes and lower CGM utilization. Using novel CGM data acquisition and analysis of two T1D cohorts, we test the hypothesis that T1D youth from different backgrounds experience disparities in meaningful CGM use following both T1D diagnosis and CGM uptake. METHODS Cohorts drawn from a pediatric T1D program were followed for one year beginning at diagnosis (n = 815, 2016-2020) or CGM uptake (n = 1392, 2015-2020). Using chart and CGM data, CGM start and meaningful use outcomes between racial/ethnic and insurance groups were compared using median days, one-year proportions, and survival analysis. RESULTS Publicly compared with privately insured were slower to start CGM (233, 151 days, P < .01), had fewer use-days in the year following uptake (232, 324, P < .001), and had faster first discontinuation rates (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.61, P < .001). Disparities were more pronounced among Hispanic and black compared with white subjects for CGM start time (312, 289, 149, P = .0013) and discontinuation rates (Hispanic HR = 2.17, P < .001; black HR = 1.45, P = .038), and remained even among privately insured (Hispanic/black HR = 1.44, P = .0286). CONCLUSIONS Given the impact of insurance and race/ethnicity on CGM initiation and use, it is imperative that we target interventions to support universal access and sustained CGM use to mitigate the potential impact of provider biases and systemic disadvantage and racism. By enabling more equitable and meaningful T1D technology use, such interventions will begin to alleviate outcome disparities between youth with T1D from different backgrounds.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elise Schlissel Tremblay
- Division of Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Allison Bernique
- Division of Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Katherine Garvey
- Division of Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Christina M Astley
- Division of Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Computational Epidemiology Lab, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Laffel LM, Bailey TS, Christiansen MP, Reid JL, Beck SE. Accuracy of a Seventh-Generation Continuous Glucose Monitoring System in Children and Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2023; 17:962-967. [PMID: 35466707 PMCID: PMC10347986 DOI: 10.1177/19322968221091816] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Accuracy of a seventh-generation "G7" continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) system was evaluated in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes (T1D). METHODS Sensors were worn on the upper arm and abdomen. The CGM data were available from 127 of 132 participants, ages 7 to 17 years, across 10.5 days of use, various glucose concentration ranges, and various rates of glucose change for comparisons with temporally matched venous blood glucose measurements (YSI). Data were also available from 28 of 32 participants, ages 2 to 6 years, for whom capillary (fingerstick) blood provided comparator glucose values. Accuracy metrics included the mean absolute relative difference (MARD) between CGM and comparator glucose pairs, the proportion of CGM values within 15 mg/dL or 15% of comparator values <100 or ≥100 mg/dL, respectively, and the analogous %20/20 and %30/30 agreement rates. RESULTS For participants aged 7 to 17, a total of 15 437 matched pairs were obtained from 122 arm-placed and 118 abdomen-placed sensors. For arm-placed sensors, the overall MARD was 8.1% and overall %15/15, %20/20, and %30/30 agreement rates were 88.8%, 95.3%, and 98.7%, respectively. For abdomen-placed sensors, the overall MARD was 9.0% and overall %15/15, %20/20, and %30/30 agreement rates were 86.0%, 92.9%, and 97.7%, respectively. Good accuracy was maintained across wear days, glucose ranges, and rates of glucose change. Among those aged 2 to 6, a total of 343 matched pairs provided an overall MARD of 9.3% and an overall %20/20 agreement rate of 91.5%. CONCLUSIONS The G7 CGM placed on the arm or abdomen was accurate in children and adolescents with T1D. NCT#: NCT04794478.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lori M. Laffel
- Joslin Diabetes Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Addala A, Ding V, Zaharieva DP, Bishop FK, Adams AS, King AC, Johari R, Scheinker D, Hood KK, Desai M, Maahs DM, Prahalad P. Disparities in Hemoglobin A1c Levels in the First Year After Diagnosis Among Youths With Type 1 Diabetes Offered Continuous Glucose Monitoring. JAMA Netw Open 2023; 6:e238881. [PMID: 37074715 PMCID: PMC10116368 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.8881] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2022] [Accepted: 03/05/2023] [Indexed: 04/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Importance Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) is associated with improvements in hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) in youths with type 1 diabetes (T1D); however, youths from minoritized racial and ethnic groups and those with public insurance face greater barriers to CGM access. Early initiation of and access to CGM may reduce disparities in CGM uptake and improve diabetes outcomes. Objective To determine whether HbA1c decreases differed by ethnicity and insurance status among a cohort of youths newly diagnosed with T1D and provided CGM. Design, Setting, and Participants This cohort study used data from the Teamwork, Targets, Technology, and Tight Control (4T) study, a clinical research program that aims to initiate CGM within 1 month of T1D diagnosis. All youths with new-onset T1D diagnosed between July 25, 2018, and June 15, 2020, at Stanford Children's Hospital, a single-site, freestanding children's hospital in California, were approached to enroll in the Pilot-4T study and were followed for 12 months. Data analysis was performed and completed on June 3, 2022. Exposures All eligible participants were offered CGM within 1 month of diabetes diagnosis. Main Outcomes and Measures To assess HbA1c change over the study period, analyses were stratified by ethnicity (Hispanic vs non-Hispanic) or insurance status (public vs private) to compare the Pilot-4T cohort with a historical cohort of 272 youths diagnosed with T1D between June 1, 2014, and December 28, 2016. Results The Pilot-4T cohort comprised 135 youths, with a median age of 9.7 years (IQR, 6.8-12.7 years) at diagnosis. There were 71 boys (52.6%) and 64 girls (47.4%). Based on self-report, participants' race was categorized as Asian or Pacific Islander (19 [14.1%]), White (62 [45.9%]), or other race (39 [28.9%]); race was missing or not reported for 15 participants (11.1%). Participants also self-reported their ethnicity as Hispanic (29 [21.5%]) or non-Hispanic (92 [68.1%]). A total of 104 participants (77.0%) had private insurance and 31 (23.0%) had public insurance. Compared with the historical cohort, similar reductions in HbA1c at 6, 9, and 12 months postdiagnosis were observed for Hispanic individuals (estimated difference, -0.26% [95% CI, -1.05% to 0.43%], -0.60% [-1.46% to 0.21%], and -0.15% [-1.48% to 0.80%]) and non-Hispanic individuals (estimated difference, -0.27% [95% CI, -0.62% to 0.10%], -0.50% [-0.81% to -0.11%], and -0.47% [-0.91% to 0.06%]) in the Pilot-4T cohort. Similar reductions in HbA1c at 6, 9, and 12 months postdiagnosis were also observed for publicly insured individuals (estimated difference, -0.52% [95% CI, -1.22% to 0.15%], -0.38% [-1.26% to 0.33%], and -0.57% [-2.08% to 0.74%]) and privately insured individuals (estimated difference, -0.34% [95% CI, -0.67% to 0.03%], -0.57% [-0.85% to -0.26%], and -0.43% [-0.85% to 0.01%]) in the Pilot-4T cohort. Hispanic youths in the Pilot-4T cohort had higher HbA1c at 6, 9, and 12 months postdiagnosis than non-Hispanic youths (estimated difference, 0.28% [95% CI, -0.46% to 0.86%], 0.63% [0.02% to 1.20%], and 1.39% [0.37% to 1.96%]), as did publicly insured youths compared with privately insured youths (estimated difference, 0.39% [95% CI, -0.23% to 0.99%], 0.95% [0.28% to 1.45%], and 1.16% [-0.09% to 2.13%]). Conclusions and Relevance The findings of this cohort study suggest that CGM initiation soon after diagnosis is associated with similar improvements in HbA1c for Hispanic and non-Hispanic youths as well as for publicly and privately insured youths. These results further suggest that equitable access to CGM soon after T1D diagnosis may be a first step to improve HbA1c for all youths but is unlikely to eliminate disparities entirely. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04336969.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ananta Addala
- Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Victoria Ding
- Division of Biomedical Informatics Research, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Dessi P. Zaharieva
- Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Franziska K. Bishop
- Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Alyce S. Adams
- Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University, Stanford, California
- Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
- Department of Health Policy, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
- Stanford Diabetes Research Center, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Abby C. King
- Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
- Stanford Prevention Research Center Division, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Ramesh Johari
- Clinical Excellence Research Center, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - David Scheinker
- Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University, Stanford, California
- Stanford Diabetes Research Center, Stanford University, Stanford, California
- Clinical Excellence Research Center, Stanford University, Stanford, California
- Department of Management Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Korey K. Hood
- Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University, Stanford, California
- Stanford Diabetes Research Center, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Manisha Desai
- Division of Biomedical Informatics Research, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - David M. Maahs
- Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University, Stanford, California
- Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
- Stanford Diabetes Research Center, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Priya Prahalad
- Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University, Stanford, California
- Stanford Diabetes Research Center, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
ElSayed NA, Aleppo G, Aroda VR, Bannuru RR, Brown FM, Bruemmer D, Collins BS, Hilliard ME, Isaacs D, Johnson EL, Kahan S, Khunti K, Leon J, Lyons SK, Perry ML, Prahalad P, Pratley RE, Seley JJ, Stanton RC, Gabbay RA. 7. Diabetes Technology: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2023. Diabetes Care 2023; 46:S111-S127. [PMID: 36507635 PMCID: PMC9810474 DOI: 10.2337/dc23-s007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 116] [Impact Index Per Article: 116.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
The American Diabetes Association (ADA) "Standards of Care in Diabetes" includes the ADA's current clinical practice recommendations and is intended to provide the components of diabetes care, general treatment goals and guidelines, and tools to evaluate quality of care. Members of the ADA Professional Practice Committee, a multidisciplinary expert committee, are responsible for updating the Standards of Care annually, or more frequently as warranted. For a detailed description of ADA standards, statements, and reports, as well as the evidence-grading system for ADA's clinical practice recommendations and a full list of Professional Practice Committee members, please refer to Introduction and Methodology. Readers who wish to comment on the Standards of Care are invited to do so at professional.diabetes.org/SOC.
Collapse
|
13
|
Tanenbaum ML, Zaharieva DP, Addala A, Prahalad P, Hooper JA, Leverenz B, Cortes AL, Arrizon-Ruiz N, Pang E, Bishop F, Maahs DM. 'Much more convenient, just as effective': Experiences of starting continuous glucose monitoring remotely following Type 1 diabetes diagnosis. Diabet Med 2022; 39:e14923. [PMID: 35899591 PMCID: PMC9579993 DOI: 10.1111/dme.14923] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2022] [Accepted: 07/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
AIM Initiating continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) shortly after Type 1 diabetes diagnosis has glycaemic and quality of life benefits for youth with Type 1 diabetes and their families. The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic led to a rapid shift to virtual delivery of CGM initiation visits. We aimed to understand parents' experiences receiving virtual care to initiate CGM within 30 days of diagnosis. METHODS We held focus groups and interviews using a semi-structured interview guide with parents of youth who initiated CGM over telehealth within 30 days of diagnosis during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Questions aimed to explore experiences of starting CGM virtually. Groups and interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed and analysed using thematic analysis. RESULTS Participants were 16 English-speaking parents (age 43 ± 6 years; 63% female) of 15 youth (age 9 ± 4 years; 47% female; 47% non-Hispanic White, 20% Hispanic, 13% Asian, 7% Black, 13% other). They described multiple benefits of the virtual visit including convenient access to high-quality care; integrating Type 1 diabetes care into daily life; and being in the comfort of home. A minority experienced challenges with virtual care delivery; most preferred the virtual format. Participants expressed that clinics should offer a choice of virtual or in-person to families initiating CGM in the future. CONCLUSION Most parents appreciated receiving CGM initiation education via telehealth and felt it should be an option offered to all families. Further efforts can continue to enhance CGM initiation teaching virtually to address identified barriers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Molly L Tanenbaum
- Division of Endocrinology, Gerontology, and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
- Division of Endocrinology and Diabetes, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
- Stanford Diabetes Research Center, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Dessi P Zaharieva
- Division of Endocrinology and Diabetes, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Ananta Addala
- Division of Endocrinology and Diabetes, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Priya Prahalad
- Division of Endocrinology and Diabetes, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Julie A Hooper
- Division of Endocrinology and Diabetes, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Brianna Leverenz
- Division of Endocrinology and Diabetes, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Ana L Cortes
- Division of Endocrinology and Diabetes, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Nora Arrizon-Ruiz
- Division of Endocrinology and Diabetes, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Erica Pang
- Division of Endocrinology and Diabetes, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Franziska Bishop
- Division of Endocrinology and Diabetes, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - David M Maahs
- Division of Endocrinology and Diabetes, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
- Stanford Diabetes Research Center, Stanford, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Zaharieva DP, Addala A, Prahalad P, Leverenz B, Arrizon-Ruiz N, Ding VY, Desai M, Karger AB, Maahs DM. An Evaluation of Point-of-Care HbA1c, HbA1c Home Kits, and Glucose Management Indicator: Potential Solutions for Telehealth Glycemic Assessments. DIABETOLOGY 2022; 3:494-501. [PMID: 37163187 PMCID: PMC10166120 DOI: 10.3390/diabetology3030037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/11/2023]
Abstract
During the COVID-19 pandemic, fewer in-person clinic visits resulted in fewer point-of-care (POC) HbA1c measurements. In this sub-study, we assessed the performance of alternative glycemic measures that can be obtained remotely, such as HbA1c home kits and Glucose Management Indicator (GMI) values from Dexcom Clarity. Home kit HbA1c (n = 99), GMI, (n = 88), and POC HbA1c (n = 32) were collected from youth with T1D (age 9.7 ± 4.6 years). Bland-Altman analyses and Lin's concordance correlation coefficient (ρc) were used to characterize the agreement between paired HbA1c measures. Both the HbA1c home kit and GMI showed a slight positive bias (mean difference 0.18% and 0.34%, respectively) and strong concordance with POC HbA1c (ρc = 0.982 [0.965, 0.991] and 0.823 [0.686, 0.904], respectively). GMI showed a slight positive bias (mean difference 0.28%) and fair concordance (ρc = 0.750 [0.658, 0.820]) to the HbA1c home kit. In conclusion, the strong concordance of GMI and home kits to POC A1c measures suggest their utility in telehealth visits assessments. Although these are not candidates for replacement, these measures can facilitate telehealth visits, particularly in the context of other POC HbA1c measurements from an individual.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dessi P. Zaharieva
- Division of Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94304, USA
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +1-(628)-238-9420; Fax: +1-(650)-475-8375
| | - Ananta Addala
- Division of Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94304, USA
| | - Priya Prahalad
- Division of Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94304, USA
- Stanford Diabetes Research Center, Stanford, CA 94304, USA
| | - Brianna Leverenz
- Division of Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94304, USA
| | - Nora Arrizon-Ruiz
- Division of Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94304, USA
| | - Victoria Y. Ding
- Quantitative Sciences Unit, Division of Biomedical Informatics Research, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Manisha Desai
- Quantitative Sciences Unit, Division of Biomedical Informatics Research, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Amy B. Karger
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, School of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA
| | - David M. Maahs
- Division of Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94304, USA
- Stanford Diabetes Research Center, Stanford, CA 94304, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Advancements and future directions in the teamwork, targets, technology, and tight control-the 4T study: improving clinical outcomes in newly diagnosed pediatric type 1 diabetes. Curr Opin Pediatr 2022; 34:423-429. [PMID: 35836400 PMCID: PMC9298953 DOI: 10.1097/mop.0000000000001140] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The benefits of intensive diabetes management have been established by the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial. However, challenges with optimizing glycemic management in youth with type 1 diabetes (T1D) remain across pediatric clinics in the United States. This article will review our Teamwork, Targets, Technology, and Tight Control (4T) study that implements emerging diabetes technology into clinical practice with a team approach to sustain tight glycemic control from the onset of T1D and beyond to optimize clinical outcomes. RECENT FINDINGS During the 4T Pilot study and study 1, our team-based approach to intensive target setting, education, and remote data review has led to significant improvements in hemoglobin A1c throughout the first year of T1D diagnosis in youth, as well as family and provider satisfaction. SUMMARY The next steps include refinement of the current 4T study 1, developing a business case, and broader implementation of the 4T study. In study 2, we are including a more pragmatic cadence of remote data review and disseminating exercise education and activity tracking to both English- and Spanish-speaking families. The overall goal is to create and implement a translatable program that can facilitate better outcomes for pediatric clinics across the USA.
Collapse
|
16
|
Marks BE, Wolfsdorf JI. Monitoring of paediatric type 1 diabetes. Curr Opin Pediatr 2022; 34:391-399. [PMID: 35836398 DOI: 10.1097/mop.0000000000001136] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This article reviews recent developments in methods used to monitor paediatric type 1 diabetes (T1D), including an examination of the role of glycated haemoglobin (haemoglobin A1c) and its limitations for long-term assessment of glycaemia in individual patients, self-monitoring of blood glucose, continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) systems and ketone monitoring. RECENT FINDINGS Monitoring of glycemia and ketones, when indicated, is a cornerstone of paediatric T1D management and is essential to optimize glycaemic control. Ongoing technological advancements have led to rapid changes and considerable improvement in the methods used to monitor glucose concentrations in people with T1D. As a result of recent innovations that have enhanced accuracy and usability, CGM is now considered the optimal method for monitoring glucose concentrations and should be introduced soon after diagnosis of T1D. SUMMARY Patients/families and healthcare providers must receive comprehensive education and proper training in the use of CGM and interpretation of the vast amounts of data. Future challenges include ensuring equal access to and optimizing clinical use of CGM to further improve T1D care and outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brynn E Marks
- Children's National Hospital, Division of Endocrinology, Washington, District of Columbia
| | - Joseph I Wolfsdorf
- Boston Children's Hospital, Division of Endocrinology, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Patton SR, Maahs D, Prahalad P, Clements MA. Psychosocial Needs for Newly Diagnosed Youth with Type 1 Diabetes and Their Families. Curr Diab Rep 2022; 22:385-392. [PMID: 35727439 PMCID: PMC9211050 DOI: 10.1007/s11892-022-01479-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW To synthesize findings from studies published within the last 5 to 10 years and recruiting families of children with new-onset type 1 diabetes (T1D). RECENT FINDINGS Children can establish glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) trajectories in the new-onset period that may persist for up to a decade. Demographic factors, family conflict, and diabetic ketoacidosis at the time of diagnosis may be risk factors for sub-optimal child HbA1c, while new immune modulating therapies and a treatment approach that combines advanced technologies and remote patient monitoring may improve child HbA1c. Nonetheless, recent trials in the new-onset period have largely overlooked how treatments may impact families' psychosocial functioning and longitudinal observational studies have been limited. The new-onset period of T1D is an important time for research and clinical intervention, though gaps exist specific to families' psychosocial needs. Filling these gaps is essential to inform clinical management and standard of care guidelines and improve outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susana R. Patton
- grid.472715.20000 0000 9331 5327Center for Healthcare Delivery Science, Nemours Children’s Health, 807 Children’s Way, Jacksonville, FL 32207 USA
| | - David Maahs
- grid.168010.e0000000419368956Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94304 USA
- grid.168010.e0000000419368956Stanford Diabetes Research Center, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94304 USA
- grid.168010.e0000000419368956Department of Health Research and Policy (Epidemiology), Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94304 USA
| | - Priya Prahalad
- grid.168010.e0000000419368956Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94304 USA
- grid.168010.e0000000419368956Stanford Diabetes Research Center, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94304 USA
| | - Mark A. Clements
- grid.239559.10000 0004 0415 5050Department of Pediatrics, Division of Endocrinology and Diabetes, Children’s Mercy Kansas City, 2401 Gilham Road, Kansas City, MO 64108 USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Tanenbaum ML, Commissariat PV. Barriers and Facilitators to Diabetes Device Adoption for People with Type 1 Diabetes. Curr Diab Rep 2022; 22:291-299. [PMID: 35522355 PMCID: PMC9189072 DOI: 10.1007/s11892-022-01469-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Diabetes technology (insulin pumps, continuous glucose monitoring, automated insulin delivery systems) has advanced significantly and provides benefits to the user. This article reviews the current barriers to diabetes device adoption and sustained use, and outlines the known and potential facilitators for increasing and sustaining device adoption. RECENT FINDINGS Barriers to diabetes device adoption continue to exist at the system-, provider-, and individual-level. Known facilitators to promote sustained adoption include consistent insurance coverage, support for providers and clinics, structured education and support for technology users, and device user access to support as needed (e.g., through online resources). Systemic barriers to diabetes device adoption persist while growing evidence demonstrates the increasing benefits of newest devices and systems. There are ongoing efforts to develop evidence-based structured education programs to support device adoption and sustained use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Molly L Tanenbaum
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Endocrinology and Diabetes, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
| | - Persis V Commissariat
- Pediatric, Adolescent and Young Adult Section, Joslin Diabetes Center, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Crocket H, Elbashy MM, Kavanagh T, Styles S, Galland B, Haszard JJ, Wiltshire E, Jefferies C, de Bock MI, Tomlinson P, Jones S, Wheeler BJ. Parental experiences of short term supported use of a do-it-yourself continuous glucose monitor (DIYrtCGM): A qualitative study. Diabet Med 2022; 39:e14731. [PMID: 34687240 DOI: 10.1111/dme.14731] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2021] [Revised: 10/17/2021] [Accepted: 10/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
AIMS To investigate the experiences of parents caring for young children with type 1 diabetes type 1 diabetes using a do-it-yourself continuous glucose monitor (DIYrtCGM) in a supported setting. METHODS Exit interviews were conducted with parents from 11 families at the end of the MiaoMiao study: a randomised cross-over trial focusing on parental fear of hypoglycaemia. Technical support was provided to participants while using DIYrtCGM during the trial. A convenience sampling approach was used to recruit parents. An in-depth, semi-structured interview approach was used. Thematic analysis was used to identify key themes and subthemes. RESULTS Parents identified that remote monitoring enabled proactive management and that overall alarms/glucose alerts were useful. Some parents reported reductions in anxiety, increased independence for their child, and improvements in the child-parent relationship. However, parents also reported regular signal loss with DIYrtCGM, along with complicated apps and challenges troubleshooting technical problems. Despite this, nine of the 11 families continued to use the system after the end of the trial. CONCLUSIONS Do-it-yourself continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) was on balance beneficial for the parents interviewed. However, while access to CGM shifted the burden of care experienced by parents, burden did not significantly reduce for all parents, as the improved glycaemic control that they achieved was accompanied with the responsibility for continually monitoring their child's data. Supported use of do-it-yourself CGM may be an achievable, cost-effective option for parents caring for children with type 1 diabetes in countries without funded access to CGM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hamish Crocket
- Te Huataki Waiora School of Health, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand
| | - Mona M Elbashy
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| | - Tom Kavanagh
- Te Huataki Waiora School of Health, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand
| | - Sara Styles
- Department of Human Nutrition, Division of Sciences, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| | - Barbara Galland
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| | - Jillian J Haszard
- Department of Human Nutrition, Division of Sciences, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| | - Esko Wiltshire
- Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, University of Otago Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand
- Paediatrics and Child Health, Capital and Coast District Health Board, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Craig Jefferies
- Paediatric Endocrinology, Starship Children's Health, Auckland, New Zealand
- Liggins Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Martin I de Bock
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Otago Christchurch, Christchurch, New Zealand
- Department of Paediatrics, Canterbury District Health Board, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Paul Tomlinson
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
- Paediatric Endocrinology, Southern District Health Board, Dunedin, New Zealand
| | - Shirley Jones
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| | - Benjamin J Wheeler
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
- Paediatric Endocrinology, Southern District Health Board, Dunedin, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Prahalad P, Ding VY, Zaharieva DP, Addala A, Johari R, Scheinker D, Desai M, Hood K, Maahs DM. Teamwork, Targets, Technology, and Tight Control in Newly Diagnosed Type 1 Diabetes: the Pilot 4T Study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2022; 107:998-1008. [PMID: 34850024 PMCID: PMC8947228 DOI: 10.1210/clinem/dgab859] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Youth with type 1 diabetes (T1D) do not meet glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) targets. OBJECTIVE This work aimed to assess HbA1c outcomes in children with new-onset T1D enrolled in the Teamwork, Targets, Technology and Tight Control (4T) Study. METHODS HbA1c levels were compared between the 4T and historical cohorts. HbA1c differences between cohorts were estimated using locally estimated scatter plot smoothing (LOESS). The change from nadir HbA1c (month 4) to 12 months post diagnosis was estimated by cohort using a piecewise mixed-effects regression model accounting for age at diagnosis, sex, ethnicity, and insurance type. We recruited 135 youth with newly diagnosed T1D at Stanford Children's Health. Starting July 2018, all youth within the first month of T1D diagnosis were offered continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) initiation and remote CGM data review was added in March 2019. The main outcomes measure was HbA1c. RESULTS HbA1c at 6, 9, and 12 months post diagnosis was lower in the 4T cohort than in the historic cohort (-0.54% to -0.52%, and -0.58%, respectively). Within the 4T cohort, HbA1c at 6, 9, and 12 months post diagnosis was lower in those patients with remote monitoring than those without (-0.14%, -0.18% to -0.14%, respectively). Multivariable regression analysis showed that the 4T cohort experienced a significantly lower increase in HbA1c between months 4 and 12 (P < .001). CONCLUSION A technology-enabled, team-based approach to intensified new-onset education involving target setting, CGM initiation, and remote data review statistically significantly decreased HbA1c in youth with T1D 12 months post diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Priya Prahalad
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94304, USA
- Stanford Diabetes Research Center, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94304, USA
- Correspondence: Priya Prahalad, MD, PhD, Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, Center for Academic Medicine, 453 Quarry Rd, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA.
| | - Victoria Y Ding
- Department of Medicine, Division of Biomedical Informatics Research, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94304, USA
| | - Dessi P Zaharieva
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94304, USA
| | - Ananta Addala
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94304, USA
| | - Ramesh Johari
- Stanford Diabetes Research Center, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94304, USA
- Department of Management Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94304, USA
| | - David Scheinker
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94304, USA
- Stanford Diabetes Research Center, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94304, USA
- Department of Management Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94304, USA
- Clinical Excellence Research Center, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94304, USA
| | - Manisha Desai
- Department of Medicine, Division of Biomedical Informatics Research, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94304, USA
| | - Korey Hood
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94304, USA
- Stanford Diabetes Research Center, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94304, USA
| | - David M Maahs
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94304, USA
- Stanford Diabetes Research Center, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94304, USA
- Department of Health Research and Policy (Epidemiology) Stanford University, Stanford, California 94304, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Zaharieva DP, Riddell MC. Advances in Exercise and Nutrition as Therapy in Diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther 2022; 24:S129-S142. [PMID: 35475701 DOI: 10.1089/dia.2022.2508] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Dessi P Zaharieva
- Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
| | - Michael C Riddell
- School of Kinesiology and Health Science, Faculty of Health, Muscle Health Research Centre, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- LMC Diabetes & Endocrinology, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Addala A, Zaharieva DP, Gu AJ, Prahalad P, Scheinker D, Buckingham B, Hood KK, Maahs DM. Clinically Serious Hypoglycemia Is Rare and Not Associated With Time-in-range in Youth With New-onset Type 1 Diabetes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2021; 106:3239-3247. [PMID: 34265059 PMCID: PMC8530719 DOI: 10.1210/clinem/dgab522] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT Early initiation of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) is advocated for youth with type 1 diabetes (T1D). Data to guide CGM use on time-in-range (TIR), hypoglycemia, and the role of partial clinical remission (PCR) are limited. OBJECTIVE Our aims were to assess whether 1) an association between increased TIR and hypoglycemia exists, and 2) how time in hypoglycemia varies by PCR status. METHODS We analyzed 80 youth who were started on CGM shortly after T1D diagnosis and were followed for up to 1-year post diagnosis. TIR and hypoglycemia rates were determined by CGM data and retrospectively analyzed. PCR was defined as (visit glycated hemoglobin A1c) + (4*units/kg/day) less than 9. RESULTS Youth were started on CGM 8.0 (interquartile range, 6.0-13.0) days post diagnosis. Time spent at less than 70 mg/dL remained low despite changes in TIR (highest TIR 74.6 ± 16.7%, 2.4 ± 2.4% hypoglycemia at 1 month post diagnosis; lowest TIR 61.3 ± 20.3%, 2.1 ± 2.7% hypoglycemia at 12 months post diagnosis). No events of severe hypoglycemia occurred. Hypoglycemia was rare and there was minimal difference for PCR vs non-PCR youth (54-70 mg/dL: 1.8% vs 1.2%, P = .04; < 54mg/dL: 0.3% vs 0.3%, P = .55). Approximately 50% of the time spent in hypoglycemia was in the 65 to 70 mg/dL range. CONCLUSION As TIR gradually decreased over 12 months post diagnosis, hypoglycemia was limited with no episodes of severe hypoglycemia. Hypoglycemia rates did not vary in a clinically meaningful manner by PCR status. With CGM being started earlier, consideration needs to be given to modifying CGM hypoglycemia education, including alarm settings. These data support a trial in the year post diagnosis to determine alarm thresholds for youth who wear CGM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ananta Addala
- Division of Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University, School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
- Correspondence: Ananta Addala, DO, MPH, Division of Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University, School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
| | - Dessi P Zaharieva
- Division of Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University, School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Angela J Gu
- Division of Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University, School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
- Department of Management Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Priya Prahalad
- Division of Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University, School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
- Stanford Diabetes Research Center, Stanford, California, USA
| | - David Scheinker
- Division of Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University, School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
- Department of Management Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
- Stanford Diabetes Research Center, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Bruce Buckingham
- Division of Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University, School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
- Stanford Diabetes Research Center, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Korey K Hood
- Division of Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University, School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
- Stanford Diabetes Research Center, Stanford, California, USA
| | - David M Maahs
- Division of Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University, School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
- Stanford Diabetes Research Center, Stanford, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Tanenbaum ML, Messer LH, Wu CA, Basina M, Buckingham BA, Hessler D, Mulvaney SA, Maahs DM, Hood KK. Help when you need it: Perspectives of adults with T1D on the support and training they would have wanted when starting CGM. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2021; 180:109048. [PMID: 34534592 PMCID: PMC8578423 DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2021.109048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2021] [Revised: 08/30/2021] [Accepted: 09/09/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
AIMS The purpose of this study was to explore preferences that adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D) have for training and support to initiate and sustain optimal use of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) technology. METHODS Twenty-two adults with T1D (M age 30.95 ± 8.32; 59.1% female; 90.9% Non-Hispanic; 86.4% White; diabetes duration 13.5 ± 8.42 years; 72.7% insulin pump users) who had initiated CGM use in the past year participated in focus groups exploring two overarching questions: (1) What helped you learn to use your CGM? and (2) What additional support would you have wanted? Focus groups used a semi-structured interview guide and were recorded, transcribed and analyzed. RESULTS Overarching themes identified were: (1) "I got it going by myself": CGM training left to the individual; (2) Internet as diabetes educator, troubleshooter, and peer support system; and (3) domains of support they wanted, including content and format of this support. CONCLUSION This study identifies current gaps in training and potential avenues for enhancing device education and CGM onboarding support for adults with T1D. Providing CGM users with relevant, timely resources and attending to the emotional side of using CGM could alleviate the burden of starting a new device and promote sustained device use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Molly L Tanenbaum
- Division of Endocrinology and Diabetes, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University, School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA; Stanford Diabetes Research Center, Stanford, CA, USA.
| | - Laurel H Messer
- University of Colorado Anschutz, Barbara Davis Center for Childhood Diabetes, Aurora, CO, USA.
| | - Christine A Wu
- Division of Endocrinology and Diabetes, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University, School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
| | - Marina Basina
- Stanford Diabetes Research Center, Stanford, CA, USA; Division of Endocrinology, Gerontology, & Metabolism, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
| | - Bruce A Buckingham
- Division of Endocrinology and Diabetes, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University, School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA; Stanford Diabetes Research Center, Stanford, CA, USA.
| | - Danielle Hessler
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
| | - Shelagh A Mulvaney
- Center for Diabetes Translational Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA; School of Nursing, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
| | - David M Maahs
- Division of Endocrinology and Diabetes, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University, School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA; Stanford Diabetes Research Center, Stanford, CA, USA.
| | - Korey K Hood
- Division of Endocrinology and Diabetes, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University, School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA; Stanford Diabetes Research Center, Stanford, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|