Adjuvant chemotherapy versus surgery alone for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and nonrandomized studies

Drug Delivery Opportunities in Esophageal Cancer: Current Treatments and Future Prospects

With one of the highest mortality rates of all malignancies, the 5-year survival rate for esophageal cancer is under 20%. Depending on the stage and extent of the disease, the current standard of care treatment paradigm includes chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy followed by surgical esophagogastrectomy, with consideration for adjuvant immunotherapy for residual disease. This regimen has high morbidity, due to anatomic changes inherent in surgery, the acuity of surgical complications, and off-target effects of systemic chemotherapy and immunotherapy. We begin with a review of current treatments, then discuss new and emerging targets for therapies and advanced drug delivery systems. Recent and ongoing preclinical and early clinical studies are evaluating traditional tumor targets (e.g., human epidermal growth factor receptor 2), as well as promising new targets such as Yes-associated protein 1 or mammalian target of rapamycin to develop new treatments for this disease. Due the function and location of the esophagus, opportunities also exist to pair these treatments with a drug delivery strategy to increase tumor targeting, bioavailability, and intratumor concentrations, with the two most common delivery platforms being stents and nanoparticles. Finally, early results with antibody drug conjugates and chimeric antigenic receptor T cells show promise as upcoming therapies. This review discusses these innovations in therapeutics and drug delivery in the context of their successes and failures, with the goal of identifying those solutions that demonstrate the most promise to shift the paradigm in treating this deadly disease.

The Society of Thoracic Surgeons/American Society for Radiation Oncology Updated Clinical Practice Guidelines on Multimodality Therapy for Locally Advanced Cancer of the Esophagus or Gastroesophageal Junction

Outcomes for patients with esophageal cancer have improved over the last decade with the implementation of multimodality therapy. There are currently no comprehensive guidelines addressing multidisciplinary management of esophageal cancer that have incorporated the input of surgeons, radiation oncologists, and medical oncologists. To address the need for multidisciplinary input in the management of esophageal cancer and to meet current best practices for clinical practice guidelines, the current guidelines were created as a collaboration between The Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS), American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO), and the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO). Physician representatives chose 8 key clinical questions pertinent to the care of patients with locally advanced, resectable thoracic esophageal cancer (excluding cervical location). A comprehensive literature review was performed identifying 227 articles that met the inclusion criteria covering the use of induction chemotherapy, chemotherapy vs chemoradiotherapy before surgery, optimal radiation dose, the value of esophagectomy, timing of esophagectomy, the approach and extent of lymphadenectomy, the use of minimally invasive esophagectomy, and the value of adjuvant therapy after resection. The relevant data were reviewed and voted on by the panel with 80% of the authors, with 75% agreement on class and level of evidence. These data were then complied into the guidelines document.

The Society of Thoracic Surgeons/American Society for Radiation Oncology Updated Clinical Practice Guidelines on Multimodality Therapy for Locally Advanced Cancer of the Esophagus or Gastroesophageal Junction

Outcomes for patients with esophageal cancer have improved over the last decade with the implementation of multimodality therapy. There are currently no comprehensive guidelines addressing multidisciplinary management of esophageal cancer that have incorporated the input of surgeons, radiation oncologists, and medical oncologists. To address the need for multidisciplinary input in the management of esophageal cancer and to meet current best practices for clinical practice guidelines, the current guidelines were created as a collaboration between The Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS), American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO), and the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO). Physician representatives chose 8 key clinical questions pertinent to the care of patients with locally advanced, resectable thoracic esophageal cancer (excluding cervical location). A comprehensive literature review was performed identifying 227 articles that met the inclusion criteria covering the use of induction chemotherapy, chemotherapy vs chemoradiotherapy before surgery, optimal radiation dose, the value of esophagectomy, timing of esophagectomy, the approach and extent of lymphadenectomy, the use of minimally invasive esophagectomy, and the value of adjuvant therapy after resection. The relevant data were reviewed and voted on by the panel with 80% of the authors, with 75% agreement on class and level of evidence. These data were then complied into the guidelines document.

The effectiveness of adjuvant treatment approaches for resectable esophageal cancer: A single-center experience

AIMS AND BACKGROUND

In general, neoadjuvant treatment is the standard for clinical stage II/III esophageal cancer (EC), whereas the effect of adjuvant treatment on survival still remains controversial. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of adjuvant treatment modalities on the survival of EC patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 63 patients with stage II-IVA EC who had undergone curative surgery between the years 2002 and 2020 were included in the study. Patients' data were retrospectively collected from oncologic follow-up files. Various treatment regimens were administered during this period, including chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy.

RESULTS

The median age was 56 years (24-73), and the number of males was slightly higher than females (male/female: 33/30). While 32 (51%) patients received postoperative adjuvant treatment, the remaining 31 (49%) patients underwent surgery alone. The median overall survival (OS) was 45.9 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 25.1-66.8) in patients receiving adjuvant therapy and 37.6 months (95% CI: 20.9-54.4) in patients not receiving adjuvant therapy. The 8.3-month survival difference was statistically insignificant (P = 0.54). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates were 87.5% versus 77.4%, 58.4% versus 51.6%, and 40.8% versus 27.6% for patients with and without adjuvant therapy, respectively. Pathological stage (P = 0.028) and lymph node status (P = 0.044) were significant prognostic factors for survival.

CONCLUSIONS

This study did not support the benefit of adjuvant treatment compared with surgery alone in completely resected EC patients. The reason for this result may be related to the small sample size and different treatment regimens due to the change in treatment options over time.

Adjuvant chemotherapy in node-positive patients after esophagectomy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The role of adjuvant chemotherapy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) remains controversial. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of adjuvant chemotherapy on survival in patients with positive nodes after surgery for ESCC.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the survival outcomes of node-positive patients with ESCC who underwent curative resection with or without adjuvant chemotherapy between January 1994 and December 2015.

RESULTS

We analyzed 460 patients (333 adjuvant chemotherapy, 127 surgery alone). The surgery-alone group was older (64 vs. 60 years, p < 0.001) and had more comorbidities (p = 0.004) than the adjuvant chemotherapy group. After propensity score matching, overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) of the adjuvant chemotherapy group were better than those of the surgery-alone group: 5-year OS rate 62.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 54.4-72.3%) vs. 46.8% (95% CI 38.5-57%, p = 0.001) and 5-year RFS rate 53.9% (95% CI 45.4-63.9%) vs. 36.2% (95% CI 28.3-46.3%, p < 0.001). Notably, in patients with pT3-4 stage, the adjuvant chemotherapy group had significantly better 5-year OS rate (41.3% [95% CI 29.3-58.3%] vs. 18% [95% CI 10-32.5%], p = 0.01) and 5-year RFS rate (37% [95% CI 25.3-53.9%] vs. 12% [95% CI 5.7-25.4%], p < 0.001) than in the surgery-alone group. In multivariable analysis, adjuvant chemotherapy had a favorable effect on both OS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.562, 95% CI 0.426-0.741, p < 0.001) and RFS (HR 0.702, 95% CI 0.514-0.959; p = 0.026).

CONCLUSION

Adjuvant chemotherapy may improve survival in node-positive patients with ESCC, especially in those with pT3-4 stage.

Efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy on overall survival in patients with lymph node-positive esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: Is oral chemotherapy promising?

BACKGROUND

The role of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with pathological lymph node-positive (pN+) resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) remains unclear. We aimed to explore whether adjuvant chemotherapy could improve the overall survival (OS) of patients with pN+ ESCC and whether oral chemotherapy could be used as an alternative to intravenous chemotherapy.

METHODS

The patients were divided into two groups: a surgery plus chemotherapy group (S + CT group, 400 patients) and a surgery alone group (S group, 582 patients). Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to create patient groups that were balanced across several covariates (n = 331 in each group). The survival rates of patients receiving oral chemotherapy (69 patients with S-1 and 68 patients with tegafur tablets) and intravenous chemotherapy (263 patients) were compared using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

In the overall study cohort, the 3-year OS was significantly higher in the S + CT group than in the S group (66.3% vs. 49.9%, p < 0.001). These data were confirmed in the matched groups (3-year OS, 72.9% vs. 62.0%, p < 0.001). Multivariate Cox regression analysis in the matched samples showed that adjuvant chemotherapy was an independent prognostic factor for ESCC (HR: 0.62, 95% CI: 0.50-0.76, p < 0.001). Patients who received oral chemotherapy had a similar OS as patients who received intravenous chemotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Adjuvant chemotherapy could significantly improve the OS of patients with pN+ ESCC, and oral chemotherapy drugs might be a better option because of their similar efficacy but fewer side effects than intravenous chemotherapy. This conclusion warrants further study in prospective, randomized controlled trials.

Impact of adjuvant chemotherapy for radically resected esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A propensity score matching analysis.. [DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-2443266/v1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0]

Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with radically resected esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Methods: Patients with esophageal cancer who underwent esophagectomy at our hospital from 2010 to 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Only patients with radically resected ESCC who did not receive neoadjuvant therapy or adjuvant radiotherapy were enrolled in this study. Propensity score matching (1:1) was used to balance the baseline. Results: A total of 1249patients met the inclusion criteria and were enrolled in the study, and 263 patients received adjuvant chemotherapy. After matching, 260 pairs were analyzed. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were 93.4%, 66.1% and 59.6%, respectively, for patients with adjuvant chemotherapy compared with 83.8%, 58.4% and 48.8%, respectively, for patients with surgery alone (P=0.003). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 82.3%, 58.8% and 51.3%, respectively, for patients with adjuvant chemotherapy compared with 68.0%, 48.3% and 40.8%, respectively, for patients with surgery alone (P = 0.002). In multivariateanalyses, adjuvant chemotherapy was found to be an independent prognostic factor. In subgroup analyses, only the patients in certain subgroups were found to benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy, such as patients who underwent right thoracotomy, pT3 diseases, pN1-pN3 diseases, or pTNM stage III and IVA diseases. Conclusions: Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy can improve the OS and DFS of ESCC patients after radical resection but may only work for patients in certain subgroups.

Impact of adjuvant chemotherapy for radically resected esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a propensity score matching analysis

Background

The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with radically resected esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).

Methods

Patients with esophageal cancer who underwent esophagectomy at our hospital from 2010 to 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Only patients with radically resected ESCC who did not receive neoadjuvant therapy or adjuvant radiotherapy were enrolled in this study. Propensity score matching (1:1) was used to balance the baseline.

Results

A total of 1,249 patients met the inclusion criteria and were enrolled in the study, and 263 patients received adjuvant chemotherapy. After matching, 260 pairs were analyzed. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were 93.4%, 66.1% and 59.6%, respectively, for patients with adjuvant chemotherapy compared with 83.8%, 58.4% and 48.8%, respectively, for patients with surgery alone (P = 0.003). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 82.3%, 58.8% and 51.3%, respectively, for patients with adjuvant chemotherapy compared with 68.0%, 48.3% and 40.8%, respectively, for patients with surgery alone (P = 0.002). In multivariate analyses, adjuvant chemotherapy was found to be an independent prognostic factor. In subgroup analyses, only the patients in certain subgroups were found to benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy, such as patients who underwent right thoracotomy, pT3 diseases, pN1-pN3 diseases, or pTNM stage III and IVA diseases.

Conclusions

Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy can improve the OS and DFS of ESCC patients after radical resection but may only work for patients in certain subgroups.

Is Adjuvant Therapy a Better Option for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Patients Treated With Esophagectomy? A Prognosis Prediction Model Based on Multicenter Real-World Data

OBJECTIVE

To construct a prediction model for more precise evaluation of prognosis which will allow personalized treatment recommendations for adjuvant therapy in patients following resection of ESCC.

BACKGROUND

Marked heterogeneity of patient prognosis and limited evidence regarding survival benefit of various adjuvant therapy regimens pose challenges in the clinical treatment of ESCC.

METHODS

Based on comprehensive clinical data obtained from 4129 consecutive patients with resected ESCC in a high-risk region in China, we identified predictors for overall survival through a 2-phase selection based on Cox proportional hazard regression and minimization of Akaike information criterion. The model was internally validated using bootstrapping and externally validated in 1815 patients from a non-high-risk region in China.

RESULTS

The final model incorporates 9 variables: age, sex, primary site, T stage, N stage, number of lymph nodes harvested, tumor size, adjuvant treatment, and hemoglobin level. A significant interaction was also observed between N stage and adjuvant treatment. N1+ stage patients were likely to benefit from addition of adjuvant therapy as opposed to surgery alone, but adjuvant therapy did not improve overall survival for N0 stage patients. The C -index of the model was 0.729 in the training cohort, 0.723 after bootstrapping, and 0.695 in the external validation cohort. This model outperformed the seventh edition American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system in prognostic prediction and risk stratification.

CONCLUSIONS

The prediction model constructed in this study may facilitate precise prediction of survival and inform decision-making about adjuvant therapy according to N stage.

Prognostic significance and postoperative chemoradiotherapy guiding value of mean platelet volume for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients

Objective

To investigate the predicting prognosis and guiding postoperative chemoradiotherapy (POCRT) value of preoperative mean platelet volume (MPV) in patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (LA-ESCC).

Methods

We proposed a blood biomarker, MPV, for predicting disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in LA-ESCC patients who underwent surgery (S) alone or S+POCRT. The median cut-off value of MPV was 11.4 fl. We further evaluated whether MPV could guide POCRT in the study and external validation groups. We used multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression analysis, Kaplan-Meier curves, and log-rank tests to ensure the robustness of our findings.

Results

In the developed group, a total of 879 patients were included. MVP was associated with OS and DFS defined by clinicopathological variables and remained an independent prognostic factor in the multivariate analysis (P = 0.001 and P = 0.002, respectively). For patients with high MVP, 5-year OS and 0DFS were significantly improved compared to those with low MPV (P = 0.0011 and P = 0.0018, respectively). Subgroup analysis revealed that POCRT was associated with improved 5-year OS and DFS compared with S alone in the low-MVP group (P < 0.0001 and P = 0.0002, respectively). External validation group analysis (n = 118) showed that POCRT significantly increased 5-year OS and DFS (P = 0.0035 and P = 0.0062, respectively) in patients with low MPV. For patients with high MPV, POCRT group showed similar survival rates compared with S alone in the developed and validation groups.

Conclusions

MPV as a novel biomarker may serve as an independent prognosis factor and contribute to identifying patients most likely to benefit from POCRT for LA-ESCC.

The efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy with capecitabine and cisplatin after surgery in locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a multicenter randomized phase III trial

There is limited evidence for the effectiveness of adjuvant chemotherapy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). This study aimed to assess whether adjuvant capecitabine and cisplatin improve survival compared to surgery alone among patients with locally advanced ESCC. This is a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Patients were eligible if they underwent curative resection for ESCC staged T2-4 or N1 and M0 according to the TNM cancer staging system sixth edition. The intervention group received four cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy (capecitabine: 1,000 mg/m 2 b.i.d for 14 days, and intravenous cisplatin: 75 mg/m2 at day 1, every 3 weeks). A total of 136 patients were randomly assigned to either the adjuvant chemotherapy group (n = 68) or surgery-alone group (n = 68). Seven patients who rejected chemotherapy after randomization were excluded from the final analysis. The cumulative incidence of recurrence within 18 months after surgery was significantly lower in the adjuvant chemotherapy group than in the surgery-alone group (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.49; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.25-0.95]. However, the 5- and 10-year disease-free survival did not differ between treatment groups (HR: 0.84; 95% CI: 0.53-1.34 and HR: 0.76; 95% CI: 0.50-1.18, respectively). Adjuvant chemotherapy after curative resection in patients with locally advanced ESCC reduced early recurrence but had no statistically significant increase in the long-term disease-free survival. Due to the limited sample size of this study, additional randomized controlled trials with larger sample sizes are necessary.

Impact of chemotherapy on prognosis of resectable pathological T3N0M0 esophageal cancer patients: a population-based study

Aims: This study aimed to retrospectively determine the influence factors and survival effects of chemotherapy in pathological T3N0M0 esophageal cancer (EC) patients based on histological type. Methods: A total of 1136 pathological T3N0M0 EC patients who had surgery were chosen from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database. The patients were divided into subgroups based on histological type and chemotherapy status. Multivariate logistic regression, log-rank test and Cox regression were used to identify prognostic risk factors and survival differences. A propensity score matching analysis was applied to adjust the covariates. The impact of additional chemotherapy was also assessed in patients who had postoperative radiotherapy. Results: The 5-year overall survival was 36.4% for all patients. Chemotherapy was an independent protective factor of survival in both adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma patients. In the survival analysis, chemotherapy significantly improved the prognosis of EC patients, both for adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma. Propensity score matching analysis validated these results. Conclusion: Chemotherapy is recommended for pathological T3N0M0 EC patients regardless of histological type.

The impact of adjuvant therapy on survival for node-negative esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a propensity score-matched analysis

Background

At present, the primary treatment of esophageal cancer is surgery-based comprehensive treatment, including adjuvant therapy such as chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy. However, the role of adjuvant therapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) with pathologically node-negative (pN0) disease is controversial. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of postoperative adjuvant therapy on survival in patients with pN0 ESCC.

Methods

Patients with ESCC who underwent R0 esophagectomy in the Department of Thoracic Surgery of Sichuan Cancer Hospital from January 2008 to December 2013 were enrolled. Patients were divided into two groups: a surgery alone (Group S) group or a surgery + adjuvant therapy (Group S + A) group. The primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS), and every consecutive case was followed up until death or the last follow-up.

Results

A total of 387 patients with ESCC patients who had pN0 were enrolled in the study. After propensity score matching (PSM), each group consisted of 150 patients. In the overall cohort, the 5-year OS (75.6% vs. 69.7%; P=0.004) and 5-year DFS (64.9% vs. 48.2%; P=0.003) rates were higher in Group S + A than in Group S. In the matched samples, the same outcomes were observed (5-year OS: 75.6% vs. 69.7%, P=0.026; 5-year DFS: 67.6% vs. 69.6%, P=0.036). Multivariate regression analysis indicated that postoperative chemotherapy was associated with longer OS [hazard ratio (HR): 0.622, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.416-0.928; P=0.02] and DFS (HR: 0.571, 95% CI: 0.390-0.836; P=0.004); in contrast, T3 stage tumors (HR: 1.953, 95% CI: 1.238-3.082; P=0.004) and <15 lymph node dissections (HR: 1.81; 95% CI: 1.238-2.648; P = 0.002) were found to be independent risk factors for pN0 ESCC.

Conclusions

Adjuvant therapy, especially chemotherapy, prolonged OS and DFS for patients with ESCC who had pN0 disease. Fewer lymph node dissections and T3 stage tumors were independent risk factors for OS and DFS.

Survival outcomes for patients with four treatments in stages I-III esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a SEER analysis

BACKGROUND

Esophageal cancer (EC) is globally acknowledged as one of the most common malignancies among all gastrointestinal cancers. Furthermore, in Eastern Asia, squamous cell carcinoma is the main pathological type of EC. There are different treatments for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), but there is still a lack of large-sample analysis of prognosis among different treatments, especially for different tumor stages. The analysis of the prognosis of ESCC patients with different treatments may be helpful to choose the treatment methods for different stages ESCC.

METHODS

A total of 3,346 patients with pathological ESCC between 1976 and 2016 were derived from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. All clinical factors associated with prognosis were collected and analyzed to achieve the difference of prognosis among different treatments in ESCC patients, such as ages, sex, race, tumor grade, anatomic location and so on. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard analysis were used to compare survival of different treatments in ESCC patients with stage I-III.

RESULTS

The overall survival (OS) in all ESCC patients who had received surgery and surgery plus radiation therapy or/and chemotherapy are superior than that had not received any treatments and radiation therapy or/and chemotherapy. The OS in ESCC patients with stage I who had received surgery and surgery plus radiation therapy or/and chemotherapy are superior than that had not received any treatments and radiation therapy or/and chemotherapy. The OS in ESCC patients with stage II/III who had received surgery and surgery plus radiation therapy or/and chemotherapy are superior than that in other groups. Age, race and grade as an independent predictive factor for survival (P<0.05). A nomogram model was constructed to show surgery group had better 1-, 3- and 5-year OS than radiation therapy or/and chemotherapy group (OS: 78.5% vs. 59.2%, 37.9% vs. 18.4%, 16.9% vs. 6.1%).

CONCLUSIONS

Surgery is still the first choice for all ESCC patients with stage I-III. Radiotherapy and chemotherapy could improve the survival rate in ESCC patients with stage II-III who have received surgery.

Systemic Therapy for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

With more understanding of the tumor biology, esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) and adenocarcinoma are increasingly recognized as different disease entities and are managed with different treatment approaches. Most patients with ESCC need systemic treatment at some point of their disease course, but only until recently, the progress in systemic treatment has been relatively stagnant compared with its adenocarcinoma counterpart. Platinum-based regimens remain the standard of care, while taxanes have been increasingly used upfront and in later lines of treatment. The attempts to personalize treatment for ESCC with various target therapies have been futile. Immune checkpoint inhibitors are now coming into play with promising activity and potentials to combine with different treatment modalities. The current chapter overviews the systemic treatment for ESCC and highlights the recent development.

The prognostic value of tumor deposits and the impact on the TNM classification system in esophageal cancer patients

OBJECTIVE

To explore the prognostic significance of tumor deposits (TDs), isolated tumor foci lacking residual lymph nodes, in esophageal cancer (EC).

METHODS

A retrospective review of patients with EC undergoing esophagectomy between 2005 and 2017 was conducted. The prognostic value of TD was evaluated using a Cox regression model. Patients from different sources and periods were split into discovery and validation sets. A propensity score matching model was used in the validation set to reduce the confounding bias. The impact of TD on the TNM classification system was evaluated.

RESULTS

The discovery and validation sets included 179 and 2875 patients, respectively. Propensity-matched patients with and without TDs were constructed in the validation set with 132 patients in each group. Overall survival (p < .001 and p = .004, respectively) and disease-free survival (p < .001 and p = .019, respectively) were both decreased in TD positive patients in the discovery set and propensity-matched groups of validation set. Classifying patients with TDs into pN3 stage improved the discriminative power of the current TNM staging system.

CONCLUSIONS

TD is an independent prognostic factor for EC. The inclusion of TD in the TNM staging system may upstage appropriate patients to help guide therapy, and future studies are warranted.

Risk factors for tumor recurrence in patients with pT3N0M0 thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after esophagectomy

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the factors contributing to recurrence in patients with pT3N0M0 thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).

METHODS

Patients with pT3N0M0 thoracic ESCC who underwent esophagectomy from January 2008 to December 2012 were included retrospectively. The last date of follow-up was 1 December 2016. Multivariate proportional hazard Cox models were used to identify factors associated with total (i.e., any) recurrence (TR), locoregional recurrence (LR), and distant metastasis (DM).

RESULTS

A total of 692 patients were included. The median follow-up was 53 months (range: 3-107). The 3- and 5-year TR, LR, and DM rates were 35.8% and 41.0%, 28.7% and 32.1%, and 16.8% and 21.1%, respectively. The Cox analyses showed that the tumor location, number of dissected lymph nodes, and postoperative therapies were significantly associated with LR. The subgroup analysis showed that postoperative therapies could significantly decrease LR in the mediastinum but not in the neck and upper abdomen regions.

CONCLUSIONS

The recurrence rate of pT3N0M0 thoracic ESCC patients was high, especially for LR in the mediastinum. Postoperative therapies can significantly reduce the incidence of mediastinal recurrence.

Impact of Examined Lymph Node Count for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma in Patients who Underwent Right Transthoracic Esophagectomy

BACKGROUND

The impact of the number of examined lymph nodes (ELNs) on stage correction and prognostication in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) who underwent right transthoracic esophagectomy is still unclear.

METHODS

Patients with ESCC who underwent right transthoracic esophagectomy at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center between January 1997 and December 2013 were retrospectively enrolled. The Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to determine the effect of ELN count on overall survival. The impact of ELN count on stage correction was evaluated using the hypergeometric distribution and Bayes theorem and β-binomial distribution estimation, respectively. The threshold of ELNs was determined using the LOWESS smoother and piecewise linear regression.

RESULTS

Among the 875 included patients, greater ELNs were associated with a higher rate of nodal metastasis. Significant association between staging bias and the number of ELNs is only observed through the Bayes method. The ELN count did not impact 90-day mortality but significantly impacted long-term survival (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.986), especially in those patients with node-negative disease (aHR 0.972). In patients with node-negative disease, cut-point analysis showed a threshold ELN count of 21.

CONCLUSIONS

A greater number of ELNs is associated with more accurate node staging and better long-term survival in resected ESCC patients. We recommended harvesting at least 21 LNs to acquire accurate staging and long-term survival information for patients with declared node-negative disease using the right thoracic approach.

Role of a multidisciplinary team in administering radiotherapy for esophageal cancer

BACKGROUND

Radiotherapy (RT) is the major part of the treatment strategy set by a multidisciplinary team (MDT) for patients diagnosed with esophageal cancer (EC). The effect of an MDT collaboration on patients with EC who underwent RT is unclear.

METHODS

We retrospectively collected all patients diagnosed with EC in the radiation oncology department at our institution from January 2015 to May 2017. The patients were divided into groups based on if they had their cases presented or not presented at the MDT meeting (with MDT and non-MDT, respectively). Propensity score matching (PSM) was applied at a ratio of 1:1 and the nearest neighbor matching method to compare the two groups.

RESULTS

A total of 212 consecutive patients were analyzed, including 157 with MDT and 55 non-MDT. In the unmatched population, the patients with MDT were more likely to received chemotherapy than the non-MDT patients (84.7% vs. 69.1%; × 2 = 6.373; P = 0.012).MDT-patients had significantly improved overall survival compared with non-MDT patients (p = 0.025). In the multivariate analysis, MDT was an independent prognostic factor for OS in patients with EC who underwent RT (P = 0.019, HR 0.59, 95% CI 0.38-0.92). After PSM for baseline characteristics, the benefit of MDT for OS became more obvious. Additionally, we also found that MDT was an independent predictor of receiving chemotherapy by using logistic regression analysis.

CONCLUSION

In patients who underwent radiotherapy for esophageal cancer, MDT was an independent factor for overall survival, which probably due to the selection of multimodality treatment when compared to non-MDT setting.

Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy versus chemoradiotherapy for node-positive esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a propensity score-matched analysis

Background and purpose

After esophagectomy, adjuvant chemotherapy (S + CT) and adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (S + CRT) can improve survival in patients with node-positive resectable esophageal cancer. However, we are not aware of any studies that directly compared these adjuvant treatments. This study aimed to compare S + CT and S + CRT for patients with esophageal cancer.

Materials and methods

We retrospectively identified patients with node-positive esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who underwent S + CT or S + CRT at Sichuan Cancer Hospital during 2008–2017. The patients’ characteristics were compared, as well as their overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) outcomes. Propensity score matching was used to create balanced patient groups according to adjuvant treatment, and a Cox proportional hazards model was used to identify factors that predicted the survival outcomes.

Results

The 859 eligible patients underwent S + CRT (250 patients, 29.1%) or S + CT (609 patients, 70.9%). After propensity score matching (247 patients per group), the 5-year OS rates were 41.8% for S + CRT and 26.8% for S + CT (p = 0.028), and the 5-year DFS rates were 37.2% for S + CRT and 25.5% for S + CT (p = 0.012). Multivariate Cox regression analysis of the matched samples revealed that, relative to the S + CT group, the S + CRT group had better OS (hazard ratio: 0.71, 95% CI: 0.56–0.91; p = 0.006) and DFS (hazard ratio: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.56–0.88; p = 0.002).

Conclusion

Among patients with node-positive resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, S + CRT was associated with better OS than S + CT. A multicenter randomized clinical trial is warranted to confirm these findings.

Clinical Value of Tumor Marker Index Based on Preoperative CYFRA 21-1 and SCC-Ag in the Evaluation of Prognosis and Treatment Effectiveness in Patients with Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to investigate the prognostic value of tumor marker index (TMI) based on preoperative cytokeratin 19 fragment (CYFRA 21-1) and squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCC-Ag) and the relationship between preoperative TMI and treatment effectiveness of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between January 2009 and December 2014, a total of 267 patients with ESCC who underwent radical resection were retrospectively enrolled. The TMI was defined as the geometric mean of normalized CYFRA 21-1 and SCC-Ag levels. The clinical and prognostic values of TMI were determined using univariate and multivariate survival analyses.

RESULTS

Preoperative TMI level was associated with age, tumor size, pT stage, pN stage, and CYFRA 21-1, SCC-Ag, neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) levels. The 5-year overall survival rate of patients with high TMI was significantly lower than that of patients with low TMI (P < 0.001). Univariate and multivariate analyses revealed that TMI (P = 0.031) was an independent prognostic factor. Patients with ESCC with high TMI level who underwent surgery combined with postoperative chemotherapy had a significantly better prognosis than those who underwent surgery alone (P = 0.015). However, no significant difference was observed in patients with low TMI level (P = 0.682).

CONCLUSION

TMI as a prognostic indicator of ESCC is superior to CYFRA 21-1 and SCC-Ag. The TMI might be useful in predicting the therapeutic effectiveness of postoperative chemotherapy and selecting patients who may benefit from postoperative chemotherapy.

Impact of examined lymph node count for oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma in patients who underwent left transthoracic oesophagectomy

BACKGROUND

The impact of the number of examined lymph nodes (ELNs) on stage correction and prognostication in patients with oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) who underwent left transthoracic oesophagectomy is still unclear.

METHODS

Patients with ESCC who underwent left transthoracic oesophagectomy at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center between January 1997 and December 2013 were retrospectively enrolled. The Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to determine the effect of ELN count on overall survival (OS). The association between ELN count and nodal status was investigated through scatter plot and binary logistic regression analyses. The impact of ELN count on stage correction was evaluated using the hypergeometric distribution and Bayes theorem. The threshold of ELNs was determined using the LOWESS smoother and piecewise linear regression.

RESULTS

Among the 1826 included patients, greater ELNs were associated with a higher rate of nodal metastasis (adjusted OR = 1.018). When the ELN count increased, the omission rate of positive lymph nodes (LNs) decreased. The ELN count did not impact 90-day mortality but significantly impacted long-term survival (adjusted HR = 0.983), especially in those with node-negative disease (adjust HR = 0.972). In patients with node-negative disease, cut point analysis showed a threshold ELN count of 18.

CONCLUSIONS

A greater number of ELNs is associated with more accurate node staging and better long-term survival in resected ESCC patients. We recommended harvesting at least 18 LNs to acquire accurate staging and long-term survival information for patients with declared node-negative disease in the left thoracic approach.

Postoperative Chemotherapy for Thoracic Pathological T3N0M0 Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

The role of postoperative chemotherapy (POCT) in pathologic T3N0M0 thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (TESCC) has not been well addressed. The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy on survival, recurrence, and toxicities in pathologic T3N0M0 TESCC.

METHODS

This study included 582 patients with pT3N0M0 TESCC who were treated at Sichuan Cancer Hospital from January 2009 to December 2017. The patients were divided into two groups: surgery plus postoperative chemotherapy group (S + POCT), and surgery group (S group). Propensity score matching was used to create patient groups that were balanced across several covariates (n = 236 in each group). Outcome measures included overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS).

RESULTS

After PSM, both groups have balance factors. S + POCT have significantly improved the 5-year OS and DFS (OS, 70.8% vs. 52.8%, p <0.0001; DFS, 66.5% vs. 50.2%, p < 0.0001). Multivariate Cox analyses in the matched samples revealed that S + POCT were independently associated with longer OS (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.56, 95% confidence index (CI) 0.41-0.77, p < 0.0001) and longer DFS (HR = 0.60, 95% CI 0.45-0.82, p = 0.001) than surgery alone. Subgroup analyses showed that prognostic effect of POCT was significantly influenced by the number of resected lymph node (≤ 20) and pStage IIB but not influenced by the number of node > 20 and pStage IIA.

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy is strongly associated with improved OS and DFS in patients with pT3N0M0 TESCC. A multicenter, randomized, phase III clinical trial is warranted to confirm these findings.

Radical esophagectomy for stage II and III thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma followed by adjuvant radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy: Which is more beneficial?

Background

This retrospective study compared the efficacy and side effect profile between postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy and chemoradiotherapy in stage II or stage III thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (TESCC) patients who underwent curative (R0) esophagectomy.

Methods

A total of 272 TESCC patients who underwent radical esophagectomy from 2007 to 2016 were included in this retrospective analysis. All cases were pathologically confirmed with stage II or III disease and 148 patients received postoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT), while the remaining 124 patients received postoperative radiotherapy (RT) alone.

Results

In CRT and RT groups, the three‐year overall survival rates were 51.3 versus 31.5% (P < 0.01) and the median overall survival (OS) was 39 months (95% CI, 31.6 to 46.3 months) and 30 months (95% CI, 21.0 to 38.9 months), respectively (P = 0.213). Three‐year disease‐free survival rates (DFS) were 30.5% versus 15.9% (P = 0.008), while the median DFS times were 26 months (95% CI, 17.7 to 34.3 months) and 19 months (95% CI, 16.4 to 21.6 months), respectively (P = 0.156). Univariate and multivariate analyses showed AJCC (American Joint Committee on Cancer seventh edition) stage and N stage were independent prognostic factors for overall survival, while the N stage was an independent prognostic factor for disease‐free survival.

Conclusions

Postoperative chemoradiotherapy led to one‐ and three‐year overall survival benefits along with an obvious increase in treatment side effects for stage II to III TESCC patients, with no further improvement in five‐year survival. However, the chemoradiotherapy benefits mainly favor stage III,number of resected lymph nodes less than 15, younger (less than 60 years old) and smoking patients.

Prognostic value of lactate dehydrogenase to albumin ratio (LAR) in patients with resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Background

We firstly identified a combination of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) along with albumin (ALB), which was defined as LAR (LDH/ALB ratio). The purpose of our study here was initially to explore the prognostic role of LAR in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) undergoing esophagectomy.

Patients and methods

A retrospective study was conducted including 346 resectable ESCC patients. Patients who received curative surgery without any neoadjuvant therapy were included in the current study. The X-tile program was performed to calculate the optimal cut-off values for LDH, ALB and LAR. The Kaplan-Meier methods, Cox regression univariate and multivariate analyses were utilized to analyze the prognostic factors for cancer-specific survival (CSS).

Results

There were 76 (22.0%) women and 270 (78.0%) men in all 346 patients. The mean value for serum LDH, ALB and LAR were 180±62 U/L (range 28-473 U/L), 40.3±5.3 g/L (range 26.6-52.4 g/L) and 4.6±1.8 (range 0.64-14.97), respectively. According to the X-tile program, the optimum cut-off points were 220 (U/L), 40.5 (g/L), and 5.5 for LDH, ALB, and LAR, respectively. The 5-year CSS was 31.8%. Patients with a high level of LAR (>5.5) were associated with poor CSS (13.3% vs 38.3%, P<0.001). Multivariate analyses revealed that LAR was an independent predictor in resectable ESCC patients (P=0.038).

Conclusion

Our retrospective observations indicate that LAR is a useful potential prognostic biomarker in resectable ESCC patients who received curative surgery without any neoadjuvant therapy with the optimal cut-off value of 5.5.

Post-esophagectomy Adjuvant Chemotherapy Benefits Esophageal Cancer Patients

BACKGROUND/AIM

Postoperative chemotherapy is an absolutely imperative treatment for advanced esophageal cancer patients, while preoperative chemotherapy is the standard therapy for clinical stage II/III esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) in Japan. The aim of this study was to report the effect of postoperative chemotherapy on survival after esophagectomy due to thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

One hundred thirteen consecutive patients with esophageal carcinoma who underwent esophagectomy were included. Several regiments were performed at various times.

RESULTS

Adjuvant chemotherapy brought a significantly superior overall survival (p=0.002), although there was no significant difference in cancer-specific survival (p=0.054) for clinical stage II or stage III esophageal cancer patients. Depth of invasion (p=0.003), number of lymph node metastases (p=0.048), and venous invasion (p<0.001) were risk factors for recurrence in the adjuvant-chemotherapy group with positive lymph nodes. Additionally, a not well-differentiated type, lymphatic and venous invasions were risk factors for recurrence in the surgery-alone group without positive lymph nodes.

CONCLUSION

Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy contributes to the prognosis of clinical stage II or III esophageal cancer patients.

Histone deacetylase 6 expression in metastatic lymph nodes is a valuable prognostic marker for resected node-positive esophageal squamous cell cancer

Background

Histone deacetylase 6 (HDAC6) exerts enzymatic deacetylation activity on histones and on non-histone substrates and plays a key role in microtubule dynamics and chaperone activities. In addition, previous studies have demonstrated its role in cancer progression. However, its clinical significance in esophageal squamous cell cancer (ESCC) has not been elucidated. We investigated the correlation of HDAC6 expression and clinical outcome in a group of T3N1–3M0 surgically resected ESCCs.

Methods

Tissue microarrays were conducted on 209 surgically resected T3N1–3M0 ESCC tumors, including 163 pairs of primary tumors (PTs) and their corresponding metastatic lymph nodes (MLNs). Immunohistochemistry was utilized to evaluate HDAC6 protein levels. The relationship between patient outcomes and HDAC6 expression was analyzed statistically.

Results

The level of HDAC6 expression in ESCC MLNs was found to be significantly lower than that in PTs (P<0.001). Patients with lower MLN HDAC6 expression demonstrated improved overall survival (P=0.011) and disease-free survival (P=0.012) than those with higher HDAC6 expression. HDAC6 expression levels in PTs revealed no prognostic significance. Multivariate analysis showed that the MLN HDAC6 expression level was an independent prognostic factor for both overall survival (HR 1.456, P=0.029) and disease-free survival (HR 1.432, P=0.033).

Conclusion

High expression of HDAC6 in MLNs but not in PTs suggests a poor prognosis for patients with resected T3N1–3M0 ESCC. We should take into account the protein expression of MLNs when assessing prognosis in patients with lymph-node involvement.

Comparison of the effect of postoperative radiotherapy with surgery alone for esophagus squamous cell carcinoma patients: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

This meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the effect of postoperative radiotherapy for patients having esophagus squamous cell carcinoma after radical surgery.

METHODS

A comprehensive research was performed in Pubmed, Embase and Cochrane Library electronic databases from inception until December 10, 2017. We collected all published full articles about comparison of surgery plus postoperative radiotherapy with surgery alone.

RESULTS

Four randomized-controlled trials (RCTs) with 1050 participants and 8 non-randomized-controlled trials with 3248 participants were included and evaluated separately. The risk ratio rate and its 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated. Both RCTs and non-randomized-controlled trials (NRCTs) groups showed a significant increase in 3-year overall survival (OS) rate (RRRCT = 0.89, 95% CI: 0.80-0.99; RRNRCT = 0.82, 95% CI: 0.76-0.88) and decrease locoregional recurrence rate (RRRCT = 0.53, 95% CI: 0.43-0.66; RRNRCT = 0.47, 95% CI: 0.32-0.69) after postoperative radiotherapy compared with surgery alone. The 5-year OS rate in the group of NRCTs was markedly enhanced (RR = 0.87, 95% CI: 0.82-0.92), while that of the RCTs group was not enhanced in a significant way (RR = 0.84, 95% CI: 0.70-1.02). Subgroup analysis based on pathological lymph node status revealed that postoperative radiotherapy could improve OS regardless of pathological lymph node status (pathological lymph node positive patients: RR5-year os-RCT = 0.81, 95% CI: 0.70-0.93; RR5-year os-NRCT = 0.87, 95% CI: 0.80-0.94; Pathological lymph node negative patients: RR3-year os-RCT = 0.76, 95% CI: 0.59-0.96; RR3-year os-NRCT = 0.52, 95% CI: 0.30-0.89). No effect on distant recurrence rate was detected. Adverse effects induced by postoperative radiotherapy were comparatively modest and tolerable.

CONCLUSION

Polled results yielded that postoperative radiotherapy was promising in improving OS and reducing the locoregional recurrence rate. More large-scale up-to-date RCTs are needed to further validate the use of postoperative radiotherapy in modern practice.

Screening Patients with Esophageal Cancer to Determine Eligibility for Adjuvant Treatment Trials

BACKGROUND

The tolerability of adjuvant chemotherapy in esophageal cancer is unclear.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a phase II trial of adjuvant paclitaxel in patients with esophageal cancer after trimodality treatment. Patients with residual viable tumor after resection were eligible for study inclusion. Treatment was 80 mg/m² paclitaxel intravenously on days 1, 8, and 15 every 28 days for total of two cycles. The primary objective was to determine whether 75% or more of the patients would tolerate 240 mg/m² or more of paclitaxel, which corresponded to 50% or more of the total planned dose.

RESULTS

Eleven out of the 12 enrolled patients (92%, 95% confidence interval (CI)=62-100%) were able to complete at least 50% of the planned paclitaxel dose. Median progression-free survival was 7 months (95% CI=2-28 months). Median overall survival was 28 months (95% CI=12-36 months). Only one patient experienced a grade 4 adverse event.

CONCLUSION

Screening patients with esophageal cancer after trimodality treatment might improve completion of adjuvant trials.

Efficacy of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A meta-analysis

Background

Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is the predominant type of esophageal cancer and most clinically curable patients are diagnosed with locally advanced disease. While the efficacy of preoperative treatment is relatively clear and well characterized, the effect of postoperative treatment, especially postoperative chemotherapy, remains controversial, and its role in the treatment strategy is obscure. We conducted an updated meta‐analysis to include recent developments.

Methods

A comprehensive search in the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases was performed to identify studies published from the inception of each database to February 2018. The overall survival (OS) and disease‐free survival (DFS) rates of patients treated with and without postoperative chemotherapy were analyzed and compared. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to assess the associations between postoperative chemotherapy and patient survival. Potential publication bias was assessed using Egger's line regression test.

Results

A total of nine studies, including three randomized controlled trials and six retrospective studies, were retrieved from the databases, comprising a total of 1684 cases. The results showed that postoperative chemotherapy could improve OS (HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.66–0.91; P = 0.002) and DFS (HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.6–0.86; P < 0.001).

Conclusions

The current meta‐analysis supports postoperative chemotherapy as an independent favorable prognostic factor for ESCC, which could improve both OS and DFS.

Mediastinal lymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer: Differences between two countries, Japan and the Netherlands

Extent of mediastinal lymphadenectomy during esophagectomy is clearly different between two representative countries of the Eastern and Western world, such as Japan and the Netherlands. In Japan, a clear policy is the standard complete two- or three-field type of lymphadenectomy whereas, in the Netherlands, a limited form is usually carried out. Reasons for these differences can be found in the different types of tumor, 80% of adenocarcinomas in the West and almost 95% of squamous cell cancer in Japan. Moreover, location of the tumors, distally located in the Netherlands whereas, in Japan, the majority are located in the middle and proximal thoracic esophagus. Also, type of neoadjuvant therapy, namely chemoradiotherapy in the Netherlands, and chemotherapy in Japan, are different. Arguments for more extended mediastinal lymphadenectomy are currently challenged in the West, first by the systematic use of chemoradiotherapy as neoadjuvant therapy and, second, the retrospective analysis of large data. According to two studies, the importance of extended lymphadenectomy is shown to be relative and less clear, especially in esophageal adenocarcinomas after neoadjuvant therapy. International efforts such as the TIGER study will help to standardize and find a relationship between the type and location of esophageal cancer, use of neoadjuvant therapy, extent of lymphadenectomy and survival.

Meta-analysis of survival benefit with postoperative chemoradiotherapy in patients of lymph node positive esophageal carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The effect of postoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for esophageal carcinoma (EC) was investigated. Patients who can obtain benefit from this treatment modality have not yet been well identified.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library for studies published from January 1993 to July 2016. Research comparing surgery alone (SA) with postoperative CRT in patients with resectable EC was procured; collected articles were written in English.

RESULTS

Nine studies comparing of postoperative CRT versus SA (n = 1650) in patients with resectable EC met the inclusion criteria. No survival benefit was achieved for postoperative CRT compared with SA. Subgroup analysis was conducted for patients under resection with positive lymph node carcinoma; there was a significant survival benefit at 1 year [risk ratio (RR) = 0.55 95% CI: 0.37-0.82; P = 0.003], 3 years (RR = 0.71 95% CI: 0.61-0.83; P<0.0001), as well as 5 years (RR = 0.86 95% CI: 0.78-0.94; P = 0.0007). Subgroup analysis by tumor histology of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) was also performed, but there was no significant survival benefit when postoperative CRT was compared with SA. Fail models after surgery were performed; the RR for local control rate and distant metastasis rate were 0.64 (95% CI 0.49-0.85; P = 0.002) and 0.87 (95% CI 0.67-1.15; P = 0.34), which indicates lower local recurrence rates of post-CRT than that of SA.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis demonstrated a survival benefit of postoperative CRT over SA in resectable EC patients with positive lymph nodes. Improvements of local control rates with postoperative CRT were also detected.

Adjuvant Therapeutic Modalities Following Three-field Lymph Node Dissection for Stage II/III Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Background: The rates of locoregional and distant recurrence for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients underwent radical esophagectomy remain high. The purpose of this study is to explore an optimal postoperative therapeutic modality by investigating the efficacy of various adjuvant therapies in the treatment of ESCC. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 408 ESCC patients underwent thoracic esophagectomy and 3-field lymph node dissection from 2010 to 2015. Patients were classified into surgery alone (Group S), adjuvant chemotherapy (Group CT) and postoperative chemotherapy plus radiotherapy (Group CRT), respectively. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to analyze prognostic factors and survival. Results: The overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were similar among groups. Postoperative CT and CRT both were beneficial for patients with positive lymph nodes, particularly for those with 3 or more lymph nodes involvement and metastasis in the middle thoracic segment compared with surgery alone. The 3-year OS and DFS for patients with 3 or more lymph nodes involvement were 30.8%, 53.7%, 50.5% and 19.9%, 41.6%, 34.0% for Group S, CT, and CRT, respectively (p=0.04; p=0.004, respectively). There was no notable difference in OS and DFS between the adjuvant Group CT and CRT (p=0.42; p=0.49, respectively). Postoperative CRT significantly reduced the rates of distant metastasis and overall recurrence for patients with positive lymph nodes (p=0.042; p=0.01, respectively). Number of metastatic lymph nodes, extent of resection, and AJCC stage were independent predictors of survival. Grade 1-2 myelosuppression was experienced significantly more frequently by patients in Group CRT than those in Group CT (P=0.03). Late toxicities were rare and manageable overall. Conclusions: Postoperative CT and CRT both were associated with better survival for patients with positive lymph nodes, particularly for those with 3 or more lymph nodes involvement and metastasis in the middle thoracic segment. Postoperative CRT was significantly more effective at reducing the rates of distant metastasis and overall recurrence for patients with positive lymph nodes.

Survival After Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Treatments Compared to Surgery Alone for Resectable Esophageal Carcinoma: A Network Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

This network meta-analysis compared overall survival after neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy (CT), radiotherapy (RT), or combinations of both (chemoradiotherapy, CRT) or surgery alone to identify the most effective approach.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

The optimal treatment for resectable esophageal cancer is unknown.

METHODS

A search for randomized controlled trials reporting on neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapies was conducted. Using a network meta-analysis, treatments were ranked based on their effectiveness for improving survival.

RESULTS

In 33 eligible randomized controlled trials, 6072 patients were randomized to receive either surgery alone (N = 2459) or neoadjuvant CT (N = 1332), RT (N = 58), and CRT (N = 1196) followed by surgery or surgery followed by adjuvant CT (N = 542), RT (N = 383), and CRT (N = 102). Twenty-one comparisons were generated. Neoadjuvant CRT followed by surgery compared with surgery alone was the only treatment to significantly improve survival [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.77, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.68-0.87]. When trials were grouped considering neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapies and surgery alone, neoadjuvant therapies combined with surgery compared with surgery alone showed a survival advantage (HR = 0.83, 95% CI 0.76-0.90), whereas surgery along with adjuvant therapies showed no significant survival advantage (HR = 0.87, 95% CI 0.67-1.14). A subgroup analysis of neoadjuvant therapies showed a superior effectiveness of neoadjuvant CRT and surgery compared with surgery alone (HR = 0.77, 95% CI 0.68-0.87).

CONCLUSIONS

This network meta-analysis showed neoadjuvant CRT followed by surgery to be the most effective strategy in improving survival of resectable esophageal cancer. Resources should be focused on developing the most effective neoadjuvant CRT regimens for both adenocarcinomas and squamous cell carcinomas of the esophagus.

Comparison of neoadjuvant chemotherapy versus upfront surgery with or without chemotherapy for patients with clinical stage III esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and chemoradiotherapy have been shown to extend postoperative survival, and preoperative therapy followed by esophagectomy has become the standard treatment worldwide for patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). The Japan Clinical Oncology Group 9907 study showed that NAC significantly extended survival in advanced ESCC, but the survival benefit for patients with clinical stage III disease remains to be elucidated. We compared the survival rates of NAC and upfront surgery in patients with clinical stage III ESCC. Consecutive patients histologically diagnosed as clinical stage III (excluding cT4) ESCC were eligible for this retrospective study. Between September 2002 and April 2007, upfront transthoracic esophagectomy was performed initially and, for patients with positive lymph node (LN) metastasis in a resected specimen, adjuvant chemotherapy using cisplatin and 5-fluororouracil every 3 weeks for two cycles was administered (Upfront surgery group). Since May 2007, a NAC regimen used as adjuvant chemotherapy followed by transthoracic esophagectomy has been administered as the standard treatment in our institution (NAC group). Patient characteristics, clinicopathological factors, treatment outcomes, post-treatment recurrence, and overall survival (OS) were compared between the NAC and upfront surgery groups. Fifty-one and 55 patients were included in the NAC and upfront surgery groups, respectively. The R0 resection rate was significantly lower in the NAC group than in the upfront surgery group (upfront surgery, 98%; NAC, 76%; P = 0.003). In the upfront surgery group, of 49 patients who underwent R0 resection and pathologically positive for LN metastasis, 22 (45%) received adjuvant chemotherapy. In the NAC group, 49 (96%) of 51 patients completed two cycles of NAC. In survival analysis, no significant difference in OS was observed between the NAC and upfront surgery groups (NAC: 5-year OS, 43.8%; upfront surgery: 5-year overall surgery, 57.5%; P = 0.167). Patients who underwent R0 resection showed significantly longer OS than did those who underwent R1, R2, or no resection (P = 0.001). In multivariate analysis using age, perioperative chemotherapy, depth of invasion, LN metastasis, surgical radicality, postoperative pneumonia, and anastomotic leakage as covariates, LN metastasis [cN2: hazard ratio (HR), 1.389; P = 0.309; cN3: HR, 16.019; P = 0.012] and surgical radicality (R1: HR, 3.949; P = 0.009; R2 or no resection: HR, 2.912; P = 0.022) were shown to be significant independent prognostic factors. In clinical stage III ESCC patients, no significant difference in OS was observed between NAC and upfront surgery. Although potential patient selection bias might be a factor in this retrospective analysis, the noncurative resection rate was higher after NAC than after upfront surgery. The survival benefit of more intensive NAC needs to be further evaluated.

Review of chemotherapeutic approaches for operable and inoperable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

The predominant histological types of esophageal cancer are adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma. Since these two histological types present as different diseases in terms of their epidemiology, pathologenesis, and tumor biology, separate therapeutic approaches should be developed against each type. While surgical resection remains the dominant therapeutic intervention for patients with operable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), their high rates of tumor recurrence have prompted investigation of multimodality therapies that combine surgery with chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and chemoradiotherapy. In Japan, preoperative chemotherapy with cisplatin (CDDP) plus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) followed by radical esophagectomy has been accepted as the standard therapeutic approach for resactable clinical Stage II/III ESCC. Similarly, the CDDP and 5-FU regimen has been accepted as the first-line treatment for metastatic and unresectable ESCCs in Japan. Thus, in Japan chemotherapy is an indispensable component of therapy for both resectable and unresectable ESCCs. This review discusses the current knowledge, rationale, and available data regarding chemotherapy for resectable and unresectable ESCCs.

Current Status and Future Prospects for Esophageal Cancer Treatment

The local control effect of esophagectomy with three-field lymph node dissection (3FLD) is reaching its limit pending technical advancement. Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) by thoracotomy is slowly gaining acceptance due to advantages in short-term outcomes. Although the evidence is slowly increasing, MIE is still controversial. Also, the results of treatment by surgery alone are limiting, and multimodality therapy, which includes surgical and non-surgical treatment options including chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and endoscopic treatment, has become the mainstream therapy. Esophagectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is the standard treatment for clinical stages II/III (except for T4) esophageal cancer, whereas chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is regarded as the standard treatment for patients who wish to preserve their esophagus, those who refuse surgery, and those with inoperable disease. CRT is also usually selected for clinical stage IV esophageal cancer. On the other hand, with the spread of CRT, salvage esophagectomy has traditionally been recognized as a feasible option; however, many clinicians oppose the use of surgery due to the associated unfavorable morbidity and mortality profile. In the future, the improvement of each treatment result and the establishment of individual strategies are important although esophageal cancer has many treatment options.

Prognostic implications of FGFR1 and MYC status in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

AIM

To investigate the clinicopathological features and prognostic implications of combined MYC and fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 (FGFR1) status in esophageal squamous cell carcinomas (ESCCs).

METHODS

All patients with ESCC (n = 180) underwent surgical resection at Seoul National University Hospital sometime between 2000 and 2013. A tissue microarray was constructed using cores obtained from representative tumor areas of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue blocks. FGFR1 and MYC copy numbers were quantified using fluorescence in situ hybridization. The level of MYC expression was determined using immunohistochemistry. FGFR1 and MYC amplification status was compared between primary and metastatic lymph nodes. Univariate and multivariate survival analyses were performed according to adjuvant therapy status.

RESULTS

FGFR1 and MYC amplifications were observed in 21.4% (37/173) and 54.2% (91/168) of patients, respectively, while MYC expression was observed in 58.9% (106/180) of patients. There was a positive correlation between MYC amplification and overexpression (P = 0.002). Although FGFR1 amplification was not associated with MYC amplification or expression, 12.3% (20/163) of patients exhibited both FGFR1 amplification and MYC expression. There was also a correlation in FGFR1 amplification status between matched primary tumors and metastatic lymph nodes (P < 0.001). MYC expression was higher in ESCCs with pT1 (P < 0.001) and in those with no lymph node metastasis (P = 0.023). MYC expression was associated with prolonged disease-free survival (P = 0.036) and overall survival (OS) (P = 0.017) but was not an independent prognostic factor. FGFR1 amplification was an independent predictor for prolonged OS in all patients (P = 0.029) and in those who did not receive adjuvant therapy (P = 0.013). Combined FGFR1 amplification and MYC expression predicted better OS in patients who did not receive adjuvant therapy (P = 0.034) but not in those who did receive adjuvant therapy.

CONCLUSION

FGFR1 amplification and MYC expression have prognostic implications in resected ESCCs with respect to adjuvant therapy. The role of FGFR1-targeted therapy in ESCC remains to be explored.

Radiation field size and dose determine oncologic outcome in esophageal cancer

Background

Locoregional recurrence is a major problem in esophageal cancer patients treated with definitive concomitant chemoradiotherapy. Approximately half of the patients fail locoregionally. We analyzed the impact of enlarged radiation field size and higher radiation dose incorporated to chemoradiotherapy on oncologic outcome.

Methods

Seventy-four consecutive patients with histologically proven nonmetastatic squamous or adenocarcinoma of the esophagus were included in this retrospective analysis. All patients were locally advanced cT3–T4 and/or cN0-1. Treatment consisted of either definitive concomitant chemoradiotherapy (Def-CRT) (n = 49, 66 %) or preoperative concomitant chemoradiotherapy (Pre-CRT) followed by surgical resection (n = 25, 34 %). Patients were treated with longer radiation fields. Clinical target volume (CTV) was obtained by giving 8–10 cm margins to the craniocaudal borders of gross tumor volume (GTV) instead of 4–5 cm globally accepted margins, and some patients in Def-CRT group received radiation doses higher than 50 Gy.

Results

Isolated locoregional recurrences were observed in 9 out of 49 patients (18 %) in the Def-CRT group and in 1 out of 25 patients (3.8 %) in the Pre-CRT group (p = 0.15). The 5-year survival rate was 59 % in the Def-CRT group and 50 % in the Pre-CRT group (p = 0.72). Radiation dose was important in the Def-CRT group. Patients treated with >50 Gy (11 out of 49 patients) had better survival with respect to patients treated with 50 Gy (38 out of 49 patients). Five-year survivals were 91 and 50 %, respectively (p = 0.013).

Conclusions

Radiation treatment planning by enlarged radiation fields in esophageal cancer decreases locoregional recurrences considerably with respect to the results reported in the literature by standard radiation fields (18 vs >50 %). Radiation dose is as important as radiation field size; patients in the Def-CRT group treated with ≥50 Gy had better survival in comparison to patients treated with 50 Gy.

Plasma fibrinogen levels are correlated with postoperative distant metastasis and prognosis in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

This study investigated the correlation of preoperative plasma fibrinogen level with distant metastasis and prognosis in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). A total of 255 patients with ESCC who underwent surgery in Zhejiang cancer hospital (Hangzhou, China), between October 2006 and December 2009, were evaluated in this retrospective study. Population controls were selected from a pool of cancer-free subjects in the same region. Each patient and cancer-free people provided 3-mL pretreatment blood. Plasma fibrinogen level was measured by the Clauss method. The effects of hyperfibrinogenemia on locoregional relapse-free survival (LRFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), relapse-free survival (RFS), and overall survival (OS) were assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Independent prognostic factors were identified in the multivariate Cox analysis. The proportion of hyperfibrinogenemia was higher in ESCC patients than those in controls (40.4% vs 13.6%). Subjects with hyperfibrinogenemia had a significantly higher risk of ESCC than those with normal plasma fibrinogen level (adjust OR = 4.61; 95% CI = 3.02–7.01, P < 0.001) after adjusted for age, sex and smoking status. The Kaplan-Meier curves showed that patients with hyperfibrinogenemia had worse DMFS, RFS and OS (P < 0.001). Tumor length, lymph node metastasis and plasma fibrinogen level were independent prognostic factors of ESCC (P < 0.05). Increased plasma fibrinogen level was significantly associated with elevated risk of ESCC. Preoperative plasma fibrinogen level was a predictor of distant metastasis and independently associated with prognosis of patients with ESCC.

Current Advancement in Multidisciplinary Treatment for Resectable cStage II/III Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma in Japan

Multidisciplinary treatment comprising surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy for resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is widely used with improved prognosis. Transthoracic esophagectomy (TTE) with extended lymph node (LN) dissection, known as three field LN dissection, has been recommended for ESCC using open thoracotomy or the thoracoscopic approach. The Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG) trial (JCOG1409) is investigating the patients' long term survival using the thoracoscopic approach that has been shown to reduce the incidence of postoperative respiratory complication. For perioperative treatment, neoadjuvant chemotherapy using cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), has been accepted as the standard of care in Japan based on the JCOG9907 trial. In Western countries, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy was shown to prolong overall survival for esophageal cancer, including ESCC. Although surgery has been recognized as an initial curative treatment for esophageal cancer, definitive chemoradiotherapy is an alternative treatment for patients who are unable to undergo thoracotomy or who decline to undergo surgery. This article reviews multidisciplinary treatment advances for ESCC. However, current standard treatments are country dependent and the ongoing trial may help standardize ESCC treatment across various societies.

Postoperative chemoradiotherapy improves survival in patients with stage II-III esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: An analysis of clinical outcomes

Background

We compared the efficacy of postoperative chemoradiation (POCRT) and surgery alone (SA) in patients with stage II–III esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).

Methods

We analyzed the records of 265 patients with stage II–III ESCC who had undergone transthoracic esophagectomy and lymphadenectomy; 105 patients received POCRT, while 160 had SA.

Results

The median disease‐free survival (DFS) of the whole cohort was 22 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 19.2–24.8), while the median overall survival (OS) was 29 months (95% CI 25.5–32.5). The median DFS of the SA group was 21 months (95% CI 17.9–24.0), while that of the POCRT group was 29 months (95% CI 18.8–31.2; P = 0.048). Consistently, patients in the POCRT group had significantly longer median OS than patients in the SA group (34 vs. 26 months, respectively). Subgroup analysis showed that in patients with positive lymph nodes, pathological stage III, T3–4 stage, and poorly differentiated carcinoma, POCRT was apparently more effective than SA at improving OS and decreasing the rates of local recurrence and distant metastasis. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that lymph node involvement and treatment with POCRT were independent prognostic factors.

Conclusion

Compared with SA, POCRT may be more effective in improving OS and decreasing the rates of local recurrence and distant metastasis, particularly in stage III or positive lymph node stage II–III ESCC patients.

The role of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy for lymph node-positive esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a propensity score matching analysis

The prognosis of patients with lymph node-positive esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) who primarily receive radical esophagectomy remains poor. In this study, we aimed to retrospectively investigate the role of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with docetaxel- or paclitaxel-based regimens in these patients. A total of 434 consecutive patients were included in this study who underwent radical esophagectomy and were pathologically confirmed to have lymph node-positive ESCC from January 2005 to December 2010 in our institution. Among these patients, 113 patients received postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy (Group SC), and 321 patients underwent surgery alone (Group S). Propensity score matching and multivariate analyses were used to compensate for differences in some baseline characteristics. After matching, Group SC had significantly longer median disease-free survival (DFS) than that in Group S (23.63 months vs. 16.70 months; p = 0.006); further subset analysis revealed that a benefit regarding DFS was only associated with patients with N1 stage and with tumor length <4.5 cm. The median overall survival (OS) was similar between the two groups (38.57 months for Group SC vs. 25.27 months for Group S; p = 0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that postoperative chemotherapy, length of the tumor, T status, and N category were significantly independent predictive factors of tumor recurrence (p < 0.05). Our data suggested that adjuvant chemotherapy with docetaxel- or paclitaxel-based regimens could significantly improve DFS for patients with N1 stage and tumor length <4.5 cm ESCC and that it could potentially prolong OS for patients with lymph node-positive ESCC after surgery, compared with surgery alone. These results warrant further confirmation in prospective, randomized trials.

Identification and Validation of Lymphovascular Invasion as a Prognostic and Staging Factor in Node-Negative Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

Lymphovascular invasion (LVI) is a histopathological feature that is associated with an increased risk for micrometastasis. The aim of this study was to determine the prognostic and staging value of LVI among patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) undergoing esophagectomy.

METHODS

A prospective database of patients with ESCC was used to retrospectively analyze 666 cases to identify the relationship between LVI and survival, and to evaluate predictive accuracy of prognosis after combining LVI and the tumor, node, and metastasis (TNM) system. Pathological slides were reassessed by gastrointestinal pathologists according to the strict criteria; 1000-bootstrap resampling was used for internal validation, and 222 cases from an independent multicenter database were used for external validation.

RESULTS

LVI was present in 33.8% of patients, and the proportion increased with advancing T and N classification. LVI was an independent predictor of unfavorable disease-specific survival (DSS) (hazard ratio = 1.59, 95% confidence interval: 1.30-1.94) and disease-free survival (DFS) (hazard ratio = 1.62, 95% confidence interval: 1.32-1.98) after T classification. Among node-negative patients, LVI and T classification were two independent predictors of DSS and DFS (p < 0.001). The risk score model combing LVI and T classification improved the predictive accuracy of the TNM system for DSS and DFS by 3.5% and 4.8%, respectively (p < 0.001). The external validation showed congruent results. The DSS of TxN0MO disease with LVI was similar to the DSS of TxN1M0 (both p > 0.05). In contrast, LVI was not associated with DSS or DFS among node-positive patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The independent prognostic significance of LVI existed only in node-negative patients with ESCC, and the combination of LVI and the TNM system enhanced the predictive accuracy of prognosis. After confirmation, node-negative patients with LVI might be considered for upstaging in pathological staging.

Aggressive surgical resection does not improve survival in operable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma with N2-3 status

AIM: To investigate the influence of nodal status on response and clarify the optimal treatment for operable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC).

METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 1490 OSCC patients who underwent transthoracic esophagectomy and lymphadenectomy between December 1996 and December 2009 at the Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center. The surgical approach and the number of resected lymph nodes (LNs) were considered in the assessment of surgery. Patients were classified according to their nodal statuses (N0 vs N1 vs N2-3). Overall survival was defined as the time from the date of death or final follow-up. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method and differences between curves were assessed by the log-rank test. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to identify factors associated with prognosis. Statistical significance was assumed at a P < 0.05.

RESULTS: With a median time from surgery to the last censoring date for the entire cohort of 72.2 mo, a total of 631 patients were still alive at the last follow-up and the median survival time was 35.5 mo. The surgical approach (left transthoracic vs Ivor-Lewis/tri-incisional) was verified as independent prognostic significance in patients with N0 or N1 status, but not in those with N2-3 status. Similar results were also observed with the number of resected LNs (≤ 14 vs≥ 15). Compared with surgery alone, combined therapy achieved better outcomes in patients with N1 or N2-3 status, but not in those with N0 status. For those with N2-3 status, neither the surgical approach nor the number of resected LNs reached significance by univariate analysis, with unadjusted HRs of 0.826 (95%CI: 0.644-1.058) and 0.849 (95%CI: 0.668-1.078), respectively, and aggressiveness of surgery did not influence the outcome; the longest survival was observed in those patients who received the combined therapy.

CONCLUSION: Combined therapy has a positive role in OSCC with LN metastasis, and aggressive surgical resection does not improve survival in patients with N2-3 status.

Smoking affects treatment outcome in patients with resected esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who received chemotherapy

Background

Cigarette smoking is reported to decrease survival and induce chemotherapy resistance in patients with various cancers. However, the impact of cigarette smoking on patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) remains unknown.

Methods

A total of 1,084 ESCC patients were retrospectively enrolled from a southern Chinese institution. Patients were divided into two groups according to their treatment modalities: the SC group (surgery with chemotherapy) (n = 306) and the S group (surgery without chemotherapy) (n = 778). Smoking status was quantified as smoking history (non-smoker, ex-smoker, and current smoker) and cumulative smoking (0, between 0 and 20, and greater than 20 pack-years). The association between cigarette smoking and overall survival (OS) was evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method and univariate/multivariate regression analysis.

Results

Among 1,084 patients, 702 (64.8%) reported a cigarette smoking history, and the 5-year OS for non-smokers and smokers was 45.8% and 37.3%, respectively. In the SC group, compared with non-smoker, the adjusted HRs of ex-smoker and current smoker were 1.540 (95% CI, 1.1–2.2) and 2.110 (95% CI, 1.4–3.1), respectively; there is a correlative trend of decreased OS with increased cigarette smoking (P_trend = 0.001). These associations were insignificant in the S group. In subgroup analysis of the SC group, the lower OS conferred by smoking was not significantly modified by age, gender, body mass index, alcohol drinking, or chemotherapy method (chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy).

Conclusion

Our results suggest that smoking may affect treatment outcome in patients with resected ESCC who received chemotherapy.