Phase‐locked responses to the vowel envelope vary in scalp‐recorded amplitude due to across‐frequency response interactions

External and middle ear influence on envelope following responses

Considerable between-subject variability in envelope following response (EFR) amplitude limits its clinical translation. Based on a pattern of lower amplitude and larger variability in the low (<1.2 kHz) and high (>8 kHz), relative to mid (1-3 kHz) frequency carriers, we hypothesized that the between-subject variability in external and middle ear (EM) contribute to between-subject variability in EFR amplitude. It is predicted that equalizing the stimulus reaching the cochlea by accounting for EM differences using forward pressure level (FPL) calibration would at least partially improve response amplitude and reduce between-subject variability. In 21 young normal hearing adults, EFRs of four modulation rates (91, 96, 101, and 106 Hz) were measured concurrently from four frequency bands [low (0.091-1.2 kHz), mid (1-3 kHz), high (4-5.4 kHz), and very high (vHigh; 8-9.4 kHz)], respectively, with 12 harmonics each. The results indicate that FPL calibration in-ear and in a coupler leads to larger EFR amplitudes in the low and vHigh frequency bands relative to conventional coupler root-mean-square calibration. However, improvement in variability was modest with FPL calibration. This lack of a statistically significant improvement in variability suggests that the dominant source of variability in EFR amplitude may arise from cochlear and/or neural processing.

Speech-Evoked Envelope Following Responses in Children and Adults

PURPOSE

Envelope following responses (EFRs) could be useful for objectively evaluating audibility of speech in children who are unable to participate in routine clinical tests. However, relative to adults, the characteristics of EFRs elicited by frequency-specific speech and their utility in predicting audibility in children are unknown.

METHOD

EFRs were elicited by the first (F1) and second and higher formants (F2+) of male-spoken vowels /u/ and /i/ and by fricatives /ʃ/ and /s/ in the token /suʃi/ presented at 15, 35, 55, 65, and 75 dB SPL. The F1, F2+, and fricatives were low-, mid-, and high-frequency dominant, respectively. EFRs were recorded between the vertex and the nape from twenty-three 6- to 17-year-old children and 21 young adults with normal hearing. Sensation levels of stimuli were estimated based on behavioral thresholds.

RESULTS

In children, amplitude decreased with age for /ʃ/-elicited EFRs but remained stable for low- and mid-frequency stimuli. As a group, EFR amplitude and phase coherence did not differ from that of adults. EFR sensitivity (proportion of audible stimuli detected) and specificity (proportion of inaudible stimuli not detected) did not vary between children and adults. Consistent with previous work, EFR sensitivity increased with stimulus frequency and level. The type of statistical indicator used for EFR detection did not influence accuracy in children.

CONCLUSIONS

Adultlike EFRs in 6- to 17-year-old typically developing children suggest mature envelope encoding for low- and mid-frequency stimuli. EFR sensitivity and specificity in children, when considering a wide range of stimulus levels and audibility, are ~77% and ~92%, respectively.

SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL

https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.21136171.

The Influence of Male- and Female-Spoken Vowel Acoustics on Envelope-Following Responses

The influence of male and female vowel characteristics on the envelope-following responses (EFRs) is not well understood. This study explored the role of vowel characteristics on the EFR at the fundamental frequency (f0) in response to the vowel /ε/ (as in "head"). Vowel tokens were spoken by five males and five females and EFRs were measured in 25 young adults (21 females). An auditory model was used to estimate changes in auditory processing that might account for talker effects on EFR amplitude. There were several differences between male and female vowels in relation to the EFR. For male talkers, EFR amplitudes were correlated with the bandwidth and harmonic count of the first formant, and the amplitude of the trough below the second formant. For female talkers, EFR amplitudes were correlated with the range of f0 frequencies and the amplitude of the trough above the second formant. The model suggested that the f0 EFR reflects a wide distribution of energy in speech, with primary contributions from high-frequency harmonics mediated from cochlear regions basal to the peaks of the first and second formants, not from low-frequency harmonics with energy near f0. Vowels produced by female talkers tend to produce lower-amplitude EFR, likely because they depend on higher-frequency harmonics where speech sound levels tend to be lower. This work advances auditory electrophysiology by showing how the EFR evoked by speech relates to the acoustics of speech, for both male and female voices.

The influence of phoneme contexts on adaptation in vowel-evoked envelope following responses

Repeated stimulus presentation leads to neural adaptation and consequent amplitude reduction in vowel-evoked envelope following responses (EFRs)-a response that reflects neural activity phase-locked to envelope periodicity. EFRs are elicited by vowels presented in isolation or in the context of other phonemes such as in syllables. While context phonemes could exert some forward influence on vowel-evoked EFRs, they may reduce the degree of adaptation. Here, we evaluated whether the properties of context phonemes between consecutive vowel stimuli influence adaptation. EFRs were elicited by the low-frequency first formant (resolved harmonics) and mid-to-high frequency second and higher formants (unresolved harmonics) of a male-spoken/i/when the presence, number, and predictability of context phonemes (/s/, /a/, /∫/, /u/) between vowel repetitions varied. Monitored over four iterations of /i/, adaptation was evident only for EFRs elicited by the unresolved harmonics. EFRs elicited by the unresolved harmonics decreased in amplitude by ~16-20 nV (10-17%) after the first presentation of/i/and remained stable thereafter. EFR adaptation was reduced by the presence of a context phoneme, but the reduction did not change with their number or predictability. The presence of a context phoneme, however, attenuated EFRs by a degree similar to that caused by adaptation (~21-23 nV). Such a trade-off in the short- and long-term influence of context phonemes suggests that the benefit of interleaving EFR-eliciting vowels with other context phonemes depends on whether the use of consonant-vowel syllables is critical to improve the validity of EFR applications.

The Influence of Sensation Level on Speech-Evoked Envelope Following Responses

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate sensation level (SL)-dependent characteristics of envelope following responses (EFRs) elicited by band-limited speech dominant in low, mid, and high frequencies.

DESIGN

In 21 young normal hearing adults, EFRs were elicited by 8 male-spoken speech stimuli-the first formant, and second and higher formants of /u/, /a/ and /i/, and modulated fricatives, /∫/ and /s/. Stimulus SL was computed from behaviorally measured thresholds.

RESULTS

At 30 dB SL, the amplitude and phase coherence of fricative-elicited EFRs were ~1.5 to 2 times higher than all vowel-elicited EFRs, whereas fewer and smaller differences were found among vowel-elicited EFRs. For all stimuli, EFR amplitude and phase coherence increased by roughly 50% for every 10 dB increase in SL between ~0 and 50 dB.

CONCLUSIONS

Stimulus and frequency dependency in EFRs exist despite accounting for differences in audibility of speech sounds. The growth rate of EFR characteristics with SL is independent of stimulus and its frequency.

The Accuracy of Envelope Following Responses in Predicting Speech Audibility

OBJECTIVES

The present study aimed to (1) evaluate the accuracy of envelope following responses (EFRs) in predicting speech audibility as a function of the statistical indicator used for objective response detection, stimulus phoneme, frequency, and level, and (2) quantify the minimum sensation level (SL; stimulus level above behavioral threshold) needed for detecting EFRs.

DESIGN

In 21 participants with normal hearing, EFRs were elicited by 8 band-limited phonemes in the male-spoken token /susa∫i/ (2.05 sec) presented between 20 and 65 dB SPL in 15 dB increments. Vowels in /susa∫i/ were modified to elicit two EFRs simultaneously by selectively lowering the fundamental frequency (f0) in the first formant (F1) region. The modified vowels elicited one EFR from the low-frequency F1 and another from the mid-frequency second and higher formants (F2+). Fricatives were amplitude-modulated at the average f0. EFRs were extracted from single-channel EEG recorded between the vertex (Cz) and the nape of the neck when /susa∫i/ was presented monaurally for 450 sweeps. The performance of the three statistical indicators, F-test, Hotelling's T, and phase coherence, was compared against behaviorally determined audibility (estimated SL, SL ≥0 dB = audible) using area under the receiver operating characteristics (AUROC) curve, sensitivity (the proportion of audible speech with a detectable EFR [true positive rate]), and specificity (the proportion of inaudible speech with an undetectable EFR [true negative rate]). The influence of stimulus phoneme, frequency, and level on the accuracy of EFRs in predicting speech audibility was assessed by comparing sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV; the proportion of detected EFRs elicited by audible stimuli) and negative predictive value (NPV; the proportion of undetected EFRs elicited by inaudible stimuli). The minimum SL needed for detection was evaluated using a linear mixed-effects model with the predictor variables stimulus and EFR detection p value.

RESULTS

of the 3 statistical indicators were similar; however, at the type I error rate of 5%, the sensitivities of Hotelling's T (68.4%) and phase coherence (68.8%) were significantly higher than the F-test (59.5%). In contrast, the specificity of the F-test (97.3%) was significantly higher than the Hotelling's T (88.4%). When analyzed using Hotelling's T as a function of stimulus, fricatives offered higher sensitivity (88.6 to 90.6%) and NPV (57.9 to 76.0%) compared with most vowel stimuli (51.9 to 71.4% and 11.6 to 51.3%, respectively). When analyzed as a function of frequency band (F1, F2+, and fricatives aggregated as low-, mid- and high-frequencies, respectively), high-frequency stimuli offered the highest sensitivity (96.9%) and NPV (88.9%). When analyzed as a function of test level, sensitivity improved with increases in stimulus level (99.4% at 65 dB SPL). The minimum SL for EFR detection ranged between 13.4 and 21.7 dB for F1 stimuli, 7.8 to 12.2 dB for F2+ stimuli, and 2.3 to 3.9 dB for fricative stimuli.

CONCLUSIONS

EFR-based inference of speech audibility requires consideration of the statistical indicator used, phoneme, stimulus frequency, and stimulus level.

Test-Retest Variability in the Characteristics of Envelope Following Responses Evoked by Speech Stimuli

OBJECTIVES

The objective of the present study was to evaluate the between-session test-retest variability in the characteristics of envelope following responses (EFRs) evoked by modified natural speech stimuli in young normal hearing adults.

DESIGN

EFRs from 22 adults were recorded in two sessions, 1 to 12 days apart. EFRs were evoked by the token /susa∫ i/ (2.05 sec) presented at 65 dB SPL and recorded from the vertex referenced to the neck. The token /susa∫ i/, spoken by a male with an average fundamental frequency [f0] of 98.53 Hz, was of interest because of its potential utility as an objective hearing aid outcome measure. Each vowel was modified to elicit two EFRs simultaneously by lowering the f0 in the first formant while maintaining the original f0 in the higher formants. Fricatives were amplitude-modulated at 93.02 Hz and elicited one EFR each. EFRs evoked by vowels and fricatives were estimated using Fourier analyzer and discrete Fourier transform, respectively. Detection of EFRs was determined by an F-test. Test-retest variability in EFR amplitude and phase coherence were quantified using correlation, repeated-measures analysis of variance, and the repeatability coefficient. The repeatability coefficient, computed as twice the standard deviation (SD) of test-retest differences, represents the ±95% limits of test-retest variation around the mean difference. Test-retest variability of EFR amplitude and phase coherence were compared using the coefficient of variation, a normalized metric, which represents the ratio of the SD of repeat measurements to its mean. Consistency in EFR detection outcomes was assessed using the test of proportions.

RESULTS

EFR amplitude and phase coherence did not vary significantly between sessions, and were significantly correlated across repeat measurements. The repeatability coefficient for EFR amplitude ranged from 38.5 nV to 45.6 nV for all stimuli, except for /∫/ (71.6 nV). For any given stimulus, the test-retest differences in EFR amplitude of individual participants were not correlated with their test-retest differences in noise amplitude. However, across stimuli, higher repeatability coefficients of EFR amplitude tended to occur when the group mean noise amplitude and the repeatability coefficient of noise amplitude were higher. The test-retest variability of phase coherence was comparable to that of EFR amplitude in terms of the coefficient of variation, and the repeatability coefficient varied from 0.1 to 0.2, with the highest value of 0.2 for /∫/. Mismatches in EFR detection outcomes occurred in 11 of 176 measurements. For each stimulus, the tests of proportions revealed a significantly higher proportion of matched detection outcomes compared to mismatches.

CONCLUSIONS

Speech-evoked EFRs demonstrated reasonable repeatability across sessions. Of the eight stimuli, the shortest stimulus /∫/ demonstrated the largest variability in EFR amplitude and phase coherence. The test-retest variability in EFR amplitude could not be explained by test-retest differences in noise amplitude for any of the stimuli. This lack of explanation argues for other sources of variability, one possibility being the modulation of cortical contributions imposed on brainstem-generated EFRs.

Fundamental frequency-dependent changes in vowel-evoked envelope following responses

Scalp-recorded envelope following responses (EFRs) provide a non-invasive method to assess the encoding of the fundamental frequency (f₀) of voice that is important for speech understanding. It is well-known that EFRs are influenced by voice f₀. However, this effect of f₀ has not been examined independent of concomitant changes in spectra or neural generators. We evaluated the effect of voice f₀ on EFRs while controlling for vowel formant characteristics and potentially avoiding significant changes in dominant neural generators using a small f₀ range. EFRs were elicited by a male-spoken vowel /u/ (average f₀ = 100.4 Hz) and its lowered f₀ version (average f₀ = 91.9 Hz) with closely matched formant characteristics. Vowels were presented to each ear of 17 young adults with normal hearing. EFRs were simultaneously recorded between the vertex and the nape, and the vertex and the ipsilateral mastoid-the two most common electrode montages used for EFRs. Our results indicate that when vowel formant characteristics are matched, an increase in f₀ by 8.5 Hz reduces EFR amplitude by 25 nV, phase coherence by 0.05 and signal-to-noise ratio by 3.5 dB, on average. The reduction in EFR characteristics was similar across ears of stimulation and the two montages used. These findings will help parse the influence of f₀ or stimulus spectra on EFRs when both co-vary.

The Influence of Vowel Identity, Vowel Production Variability, and Consonant Environment on Envelope Following Responses

OBJECTIVES

The vowel-evoked envelope following response (EFR) is a useful tool for studying brainstem processing of speech in natural consonant-vowel productions. Previous work, however, demonstrates that the amplitude of EFRs is highly variable across vowels. To clarify factors contributing to the variability observed, the objectives of the present study were to evaluate: (1) the influence of vowel identity and the consonant context surrounding each vowel on EFR amplitude and (2) the effect of variations in repeated productions of a vowel on EFR amplitude while controlling for the consonant context.

DESIGN

In Experiment 1, EFRs were recorded in response to seven English vowels (/ij/, /Ι/, /ej/, /ε/, /æ/, /u/, and /JOURNAL/earher/04.03/00003446-202105000-00017/inline-graphic1/v/2021-04-30T105427Z/r/image-tiff/) embedded in each of four consonant contexts (/hVd/, /sVt/, /zVf/, and /JOURNAL/earher/04.03/00003446-202105000-00017/inline-graphic2/v/2021-04-30T105427Z/r/image-tiffVv/). In Experiment 2, EFRs were recorded in response to four different variants of one of the four possible vowels (/ij/, /ε/, /æ/, or /JOURNAL/earher/04.03/00003446-202105000-00017/inline-graphic3/v/2021-04-30T105427Z/r/image-tiff/), embedded in the same consonant-vowel-consonant environments used in Experiment 1. All vowels were edited to minimize formant transitions before embedding in a consonant context. Different talkers were used for the two experiments. Data from a total of 30 and 64 (16 listeners/vowel) young adults with normal hearing were included in Experiments 1 and 2, respectively. EFRs were recorded using a single-channel electrode montage between the vertex and nape of the neck while stimuli were presented monaurally.

RESULTS

In Experiment 1, vowel identity had a significant effect on EFR amplitude with the vowel /æ/ eliciting the highest amplitude EFRs (170 nV, on average), and the vowel /ej/ eliciting the lowest amplitude EFRs (106 nV, on average). The consonant context surrounding each vowel stimulus had no statistically significant effect on EFR amplitude. Similarly in Experiment 2, consonant context did not influence the amplitude of EFRs elicited by the vowel variants. Vowel identity significantly altered EFR amplitude with /ε/ eliciting the highest amplitude EFRs (104 nV, on average). Significant, albeit small, differences (<21 nV, on average) in EFR amplitude were evident between some variants of /ε/ and /u/.

CONCLUSION

Based on a comprehensive set of naturally produced vowel samples in carefully controlled consonant contexts, the present study provides additional evidence for the sensitivity of EFRs to vowel identity and variations in vowel production. The surrounding consonant context (after removal of formant transitions) has no measurable effect on EFRs, irrespective of vowel identity and variant. The sensitivity of EFRs to nuances in vowel acoustics emphasizes the need for adequate control and evaluation of stimuli proposed for clinical and research purposes.

Characteristics of Speech-Evoked Envelope Following Responses in Infancy

Envelope following responses (EFRs) may be a useful tool for evaluating the audibility of speech sounds in infants. The present study aimed to evaluate the characteristics of speech-evoked EFRs in infants with normal hearing, relative to adults, and identify age-dependent changes in EFR characteristics during infancy. In 42 infants and 21 young adults, EFRs were elicited by the first (F1) and the second and higher formants (F2+) of the vowels /u/, /a/, and /i/, dominant in low and mid frequencies, respectively, and by amplitude-modulated fricatives /s/ and /∫/, dominant in high frequencies. In a subset of 20 infants, the in-ear stimulus level was adjusted to match that of an average adult ear (65 dB sound pressure level [SPL]). We found that (a) adult-infant differences in EFR amplitude, signal-to-noise ratio, and intertrial phase coherence were larger and spread across the frequency range when in-ear stimulus level was adjusted in infants, (b) adult-infant differences in EFR characteristics were the largest for low-frequency stimuli, (c) infants demonstrated adult-like phase coherence when they received a higher (i.e., unadjusted) stimulus level, and (d) EFR phase coherence and signal-to-noise ratio changed with age in the first year of life for a few F2+ vowel stimuli in a level-specific manner. Together, our findings reveal that development-related changes in EFRs during infancy likely vary by stimulus frequency, with low-frequency stimuli demonstrating the largest adult-infant differences. Consistent with previous research, our findings emphasize the significant role of stimulus level calibration methods while investigating developmental trends in EFRs.

Chirp Analyzer for Estimating Amplitude and Latency of Steady-State Auditory Envelope Following Responses

OBJECTIVE

The envelope following response (EFR) is a clinically relevant evoked potential, reflecting the synchronization of the auditory pathway to the temporal envelope of sounds. Since there is no standard analysis of this potential, we here aim at contrasting the relative accuracy of known time-frequency methods and new strategies for the reliable estimation of the EFR amplitude and latency.

METHODS

The EFR was estimated using explicit time-frequency methods: the Short-Term Fourier Transform (STFT) and the Morlet Continuous Wavelet Transform (CWT). Furthermore, the Chirp Analyzer (CA) was introduced as a new tool for the reliable estimation of the EFR. The applicability of the methods was tested in animal and human recordings.

RESULTS

Using simulated data for comparing the estimation performance by each method, we found that the CA is able to correctly estimate EFR amplitudes, without the typical bias observed in the STFT estimates. The CA is more robust to noise than the CWT method, although with higher sensitivity to the latency of the response. Thus, the estimation of the EFR amplitude with any of the methods, but especially with CA, should be corrected by using the estimated delay. Analysis of real data confirmed these results and showed that all methods offer estimated EFRs similar to those found in previous studies using the classical Fourier Analyzer.

CONCLUSION AND SIGNIFICANCE

The CA is a potential valuable tool for the analysis of the EFR, which could be extended for the estimation of oscillatory evoked potentials of other sensory modalities.

Human Frequency Following Responses to Filtered Speech

OBJECTIVES

There is increasing interest in using the frequency following response (FFR) to describe the effects of varying different aspects of hearing aid signal processing on brainstem neural representation of speech. To this end, recent studies have examined the effects of filtering on brainstem neural representation of the speech fundamental frequency (f0) in listeners with normal hearing sensitivity by measuring FFRs to low- and high-pass filtered signals. However, the stimuli used in these studies do not reflect the entire range of typical cutoff frequencies used in frequency-specific gain adjustments during hearing aid fitting. Further, there has been limited discussion on the effect of filtering on brainstem neural representation of formant-related harmonics. Here, the effects of filtering on brainstem neural representation of speech fundamental frequency (f0) and harmonics related to first formant frequency (F1) were assessed by recording envelope and spectral FFRs to a vowel low-, high-, and band-pass filtered at cutoff frequencies ranging from 0.125 to 8 kHz.

DESIGN

FFRs were measured to a synthetically generated vowel stimulus /u/ presented in a full bandwidth and low-pass (experiment 1), high-pass (experiment 2), and band-pass (experiment 3) filtered conditions. In experiment 1, FFRs were measured to a synthetically generated vowel stimulus /u/ presented in a full bandwidth condition as well as 11 low-pass filtered conditions (low-pass cutoff frequencies: 0.125, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, and 8 kHz) in 19 adult listeners with normal hearing sensitivity. In experiment 2, FFRs were measured to the same synthetically generated vowel stimulus /u/ presented in a full bandwidth condition as well as 10 high-pass filtered conditions (high-pass cutoff frequencies: 0.125, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, and 6 kHz) in 7 adult listeners with normal hearing sensitivity. In experiment 3, in addition to the full bandwidth condition, FFRs were measured to vowel /u/ low-pass filtered at 2 kHz, band-pass filtered between 2-4 kHz and 4-6 kHz in 10 adult listeners with normal hearing sensitivity. A Fast Fourier Transform analysis was conducted to measure the strength of f0 and the F1-related harmonic relative to the noise floor in the brainstem neural responses obtained to the full bandwidth and filtered stimulus conditions.

RESULTS

Brainstem neural representation of f0 was reduced when the low-pass filter cutoff frequency was between 0.25 and 0.5 kHz; no differences in f0 strength were noted between conditions when the low-pass filter cutoff condition was at or greater than 0.75 kHz. While envelope FFR f0 strength was reduced when the stimulus was high-pass filtered at 6 kHz, there was no effect of high-pass filtering on brainstem neural representation of f0 when the high-pass filter cutoff frequency ranged from 0.125 to 4 kHz. There was a weakly significant global effect of band-pass filtering on brainstem neural phase-locking to f0. A trends analysis indicated that mean f0 magnitude in the brainstem neural response was greater when the stimulus was band-pass filtered between 2 and 4 kHz as compared to when the stimulus was band-pass filtered between 4 and 6 kHz, low-pass filtered at 2 kHz or presented in the full bandwidth condition. Last, neural phase-locking to f0 was reduced or absent in envelope FFRs measured to filtered stimuli that lacked spectral energy above 0.125 kHz or below 6 kHz. Similarly, little to no energy was seen at F1 in spectral FFRs obtained to low-, high-, or band-pass filtered stimuli that did not contain energy in the F1 region. For stimulus conditions that contained energy at F1, the strength of the peak at F1 in the spectral FFR varied little with low-, high-, or band-pass filtering.

CONCLUSIONS

Energy at f0 in envelope FFRs may arise due to neural phase-locking to low-, mid-, or high-frequency stimulus components, provided the stimulus envelope is modulated by at least two interacting harmonics. Stronger neural responses at f0 are measured when filtering results in stimulus bandwidths that preserve stimulus energy at F1 and F2. In addition, results suggest that unresolved harmonics may favorably influence f0 strength in the neural response. Lastly, brainstem neural representation of the F1-related harmonic measured in spectral FFRs obtained to filtered stimuli is related to the presence or absence of stimulus energy at F1. These findings add to the existing literature exploring the viability of the FFR as an objective technique to evaluate hearing aid fitting where stimulus bandwidth is altered by design due to frequency-specific gain applied by amplification algorithms.

From modulated noise to natural speech: The effect of stimulus parameters on the envelope following response

Envelope following responses (EFRs) can be evoked by a wide range of auditory stimuli, but for many stimulus parameters the effect on EFR strength is not fully understood. This complicates the comparison of earlier studies and the design of new studies. Furthermore, the most optimal stimulus parameters are unknown. To help resolve this issue, we investigated the effects of four important stimulus parameters and their interactions on the EFR. Responses were measured in 16 normal hearing subjects evoked by stimuli with four levels of stimulus complexity (amplitude modulated noise, artificial vowels, natural vowels and vowel-consonant-vowel combinations), three fundamental frequencies (105 Hz, 185 Hz and 245 Hz), three fundamental frequency contours (upward sweeping, downward sweeping and flat) and three vowel identities (Flemish /a:/, /u:/, and /i:/). We found that EFRs evoked by artificial vowels were on average 4-6 dB SNR larger than responses evoked by the other stimulus complexities, probably because of (unnaturally) strong higher harmonics. Moreover, response amplitude decreased with fundamental frequency but response SNR remained largely unaffected. Thirdly, fundamental frequency variation within the stimulus did not impact EFR strength, but only when rate of change remained low (e.g. not the case for sweeping natural vowels). Finally, the vowel /i:/ appeared to evoke larger response amplitudes compared to /a:/ and /u:/, but analysis power was too small to confirm this statistically. Vowel-dependent differences in response strength have been suggested to stem from destructive interference between response components. We show how a model of the auditory periphery can simulate these interference patterns and predict response strength. Altogether, the results of this study can guide stimulus choice for future EFR research and practical applications.

Assessing Cochlear-Place Specific Temporal Coding Using Multi-Band Complex Tones to Measure Envelope-Following Responses

Previous studies suggest that envelope-following responses (EFRs) reveal important differences in temporal coding fidelity amongst listeners who have normal hearing thresholds, consistent with these listeners differing in the degree to which they suffer from cochlear synaptopathy. Like conventional hearing loss, the severity of cochlear synaptopathy may vary along the cochlea. A number of earlier studies have suggested methods for estimating EFRs driven by specific frequency regions of the cochlea, which would allow synaptopathy to be estimated as a function of cochlear place. Here, we tested a method for measuring EFRs from multiple locations along the cochlea simultaneously, using narrowband stimuli. We compared responses to multiple simultaneous narrowband complex harmonic tones in three non-overlapping frequency bands, each having a unique fundamental frequency, to responses to the individual narrowband stimuli alone, and to responses when noise was added to different combinations of the frequency bands. Our results suggest that simultaneous presentation of multiple tone complexes with different fundamental frequencies leads to repeatable measures of temporal coding fidelity at the cochlear frequency regions corresponding to the narrowband carrier frequencies. Other results suggested that while off-frequency contributions to EFRs driven by narrowband signals (due to spread of excitation) can add destructively to the on frequency response, these interactions were small compared to EFR magnitude. Overall, our results point to the utility of using multi-band complex tone stimuli to estimate the profile of temporal coding fidelity, and thus the degree of synaptopathy, as a function of cochlear place. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Hearing Loss, Tinnitus, Hyperacusis, Central Gain.