Comparisons of the efficacy and tolerability of mycophenolate mofetil and azathioprine as treatments for neuromyelitis optica and neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder

Correlation between severe attacks and serum aquaporin-4 antibody titer in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder

Aquaporin 4-immunoglobulin G (AQP4-IgG) specifically targets aquaporin 4 in approximately 80% of Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder (NMOSD) cases. NMOSD is presently categorized as anti-AQP4-antibody (Ab) positive or negative based on AQP4-Ab presence. The association between antibody titers and patient prognosis remains unclear. Therefore, the present study explores the correlation between severe attacks and serum AQP4 Ab titers in patients with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder. Data were gathered retrospectively from 546 patients with NMOSD between September 1, 2009, and December 1, 2021. Patients were categorized based on their AQP4-Ab titers: AQP4 titer ≥ 1:320 were classified as the high-titer group, AQP4 (+ +), and AQP4 titer of ≤ 1:100 were classified as the low-titer group, AQP4 ( +). Clinical characteristics and prognoses between the two groups were compared. Patients with AQP4 ( +) exhibited few severe optic neuritis (SON) attacks (false discovery rate [FDR] corrected p < 0.001), a reduced percentage experiencing SON attacks, and a lower incidence of visual disability than patients with AQP4 (+ +). Patients with AQP4 (+ +) and AQP4 ( +) NMOSD exhibited significant difference in annual recurrence rate (ARR) (FDR-corrected p < 0.001). The lower AQP4 Ab titer group demonstrated reduced susceptibility to severe relapse with conventional immunosuppressive agents and rituximab (RTX) than the higher titer group. No significant differences in sex, age at onset, coexisting connective tissue diseases, motor disability, or mortality rates were observed between the two groups. Higher AQP4 Ab titers correlated with increased disease severity and visual disability in patients with NMOSD.

Mycophenolate and methotrexate are better tolerated than azathioprine in myasthenia gravis

Azathioprine is recommended as the first-line steroid-sparing immunosuppressive agent for myasthenia gravis. Mycophenolate and methotrexate are often considered as second-line choices despite widespread consensus on their efficacy. We aimed to gather real-world data comparing the tolerability and reasons for discontinuation for these agents, by performing a national United Kingdom survey of side effects and reasons for discontinuation of immunosuppressants in myasthenia gravis. Of 235 patients, 166 had taken azathioprine, 102 mycophenolate, and 40 methotrexate. The most common side effects for each agent were liver dysfunction for azathioprine (23 %), diarrhoea for mycophenolate (14 %), and fatigue for methotrexate (18 %). Women were generally more likely to experience side effects of immunosuppressants. Azathioprine was significantly more likely to be discontinued than mycophenolate and methotrexate due to side effects. There was no significant difference in treatment cessation due to lack of efficacy. This study highlights the significant side-effect burden of treatment for myasthenia gravis. Mechanisms to reduce azathioprine toxicity should be utilised, however mycophenolate and methotrexate appear to be good treatment choices if teratogenicity is not a concern. Women are disadvantaged due to higher frequency of side effects and considerations around pregnancy and breastfeeding. Treatments with improved tolerability are needed.

Intruders or protectors - the multifaceted role of B cells in CNS disorders

B lymphocytes are immune cells studied predominantly in the context of peripheral humoral immune responses against pathogens. Evidence has been accumulating in recent years on the diversity of immunomodulatory functions that B cells undertake, with particular relevance for pathologies of the central nervous system (CNS). This review summarizes current knowledge on B cell populations, localization, infiltration mechanisms, and function in the CNS and associated tissues. Acute and chronic neurodegenerative pathologies are examined in order to explore the complex, and sometimes conflicting, effects that B cells can have in each context, with implications for disease progression and treatment outcomes. Additional factors such as aging modulate the proportions and function of B cell subpopulations over time and are also discussed in the context of neuroinflammatory response and disease susceptibility. A better understanding of the multifactorial role of B cell populations in the CNS may ultimately lead to innovative therapeutic strategies for a variety of neurological conditions.

Relapses and Serious Infections in Patients with Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder Treated with Rituximab: A Swedish Single-Center Study

Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is a rare immune-mediated relapsing-remitting disease of the central nervous system. The usage of rituximab, as relapse-preventive therapy, in NMOSD is common. We performed a single-center retrospective cohort study to assess the risk of relapses and severe infectious events (SIEs) in rituximab-treated NMOSD patients. This study included 24 aquaporin-4 IgG+ (AQP4+), 8 myelin-oligodendrocyte-protein IgG+ (MOG+), and 10 double-seronegative NMOSD patients. Relapses were observed in 50% of all patients during a mean treatment time of 4.0 (range: 0.5-8.25) years. The incidence risk ratio (IRR) of relapse was three times higher in MOG+ compared to AQP4+ patients (IRR: 3.0, 95% confidence interval (CI); 1.2-7.7). SIEs occurred in 40% of all patients during follow-up. AQP4+ patients conferred an increased risk of SIEs compared to MOG+ patients (IRR; 5.3, 95% CI; 1.2-24.3). Incomplete CD19+ B-lymphocyte suppression was not correlated with relapse risk (hazard ratio; 1.9, 95% CI; 0.7-5.2), and there was no correlation between IgG-levels and SIE risk (odds ratio; 2.0, 95% CI; 0.8-4.8). In conclusion, considerable risks of both relapses and SIEs were observed in NMOSD patients exposed to rituximab, which underlines the need for close clinical vigilance of disease activity and infections during treatment.

Update on the diagnosis and treatment of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) - revised recommendations of the Neuromyelitis Optica Study Group (NEMOS). Part II: Attack therapy and long-term management

This manuscript presents practical recommendations for managing acute attacks and implementing preventive immunotherapies for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD), a rare autoimmune disease that causes severe inflammation in the central nervous system (CNS), primarily affecting the optic nerves, spinal cord, and brainstem. The pillars of NMOSD therapy are attack treatment and attack prevention to minimize the accrual of neurological disability. Aquaporin-4 immunoglobulin G antibodies (AQP4-IgG) are a diagnostic marker of the disease and play a significant role in its pathogenicity. Recent advances in understanding NMOSD have led to the development of new therapies and the completion of randomized controlled trials. Four preventive immunotherapies have now been approved for AQP4-IgG-positive NMOSD in many regions of the world: eculizumab, ravulizumab - most recently-, inebilizumab, and satralizumab. These new drugs may potentially substitute rituximab and classical immunosuppressive therapies, which were as yet the mainstay of treatment for both, AQP4-IgG-positive and -negative NMOSD. Here, the Neuromyelitis Optica Study Group (NEMOS) provides an overview of the current state of knowledge on NMOSD treatments and offers statements and practical recommendations on the therapy management and use of all available immunotherapies for this disease. Unmet needs and AQP4-IgG-negative NMOSD are also discussed. The recommendations were developed using a Delphi-based consensus method among the core author group and at expert discussions at NEMOS meetings.

Serum antinuclear antibodies associate with severe disease activity in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder

BACKGROUND

Studies suggest that antinuclear antibodies (ANAs) may correlate with the long-term prognosis of Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD). In this study, we investigated ANAs in Chinese patients with NMOSD and their relationship with disease outcomes.

METHODS

We retrospectively collected data from 525 patients diagnosed with NMOSD at West China Hospital between September 1, 2009, and October 1, 2021. Patients were classified into two groups: NMOSD with ANA (+) or without ANA (-). We compared the clinical characteristics, relapse rate, severe attacks, laboratory tests, Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), and prognosis between the two groups.

RESULTS

Among the 525 NMOSD patients, those with ANA showed a higher frequency of AQP4-IgG (94.1% vs 79.3%, p < 0.001, false discovery rate (FDR) corrected p < 0.001), and anti-SSA (p < 0.001, FDR corrected p < 0.001), anti-SSB (p < 0.001, FDR corrected p < 0.001), anti-Ro52 antibodies (p < 0.001, FDR corrected p < 0.001), than those without ANA. ANA was detected in 403 patients during the acute phase. Patients with ANA (+) had higher EDSS scores in the acute stage (4.0 vs. 3.75, p = 0.013, FDR corrected p = 0.029) and at final follow-up (p = 0.032, FDR corrected p = 0.064). NMOSD patients with ANA (+) had a higher frequency of severe acute myelitis attack, severe acute myelitis and optic neuritis attack, motor and visual disability, compared to those with ANA (-) (42.1% vs. 27.8%, p = 0.001, FDR corrected p = 0.004, 19.3% vs. 10.3%, p = 0.004, FDR corrected p = 0.018, and 11.1% vs. 4.8%, p = 0.008, FDR corrected p = 0.022 respectively). The two groups had no significant difference in the annual recurrence rate (ARR).

CONCLUSION

ANA may be associated with more severe disease activity and disability in NMOSD.

A Clinical Approach to Existing and Emerging Therapeutics in Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is a rare but highly disabling disease of the central nervous system. Unlike multiple sclerosis, disability in NMOSD occurs secondary to relapses that, not uncommonly, lead to blindness, paralysis, and death. Recently, newer, targeted immunotherapies have been trialed and are now in the treatment arsenal. We have endeavoured to evaluate the current state of NMOSD therapeutics.

RECENT FINDINGS

This review provides a pragmatic evaluation of recent clinical trials and post-marketing data for rituximab, inebilizumab, satralizumab, eculizumab, and ravalizumab, contrasted to older agents. We also review contemporary issues such as treatment in the context of SARS-CoV2 infection and pregnancy. There has been a dramatic shift in NMOSD morbidity and mortality with earlier and improved disease recognition, diagnostic accuracy, and the advent of more effective, targeted therapies. Choosing a maintenance therapy remains nuanced depending on patient factors and accessibility. With over 100 putative agents in trials, disease-free survival is now a realistic goal for NMOSD patients.

Pediatric Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder

Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder (NMOSD) is a demyelinating disease with a high relapse rate and risk of disability accrual. The condition is an astrocytopathy, with antibodies to the aquaporin-4 (AQP4) water channel being detected in AQP4-IgG seropositive disease. Presentation is uncommon in the pediatric age range, accounting for about 3%-5% of cases. NMOSD is more prevalent in populations of Black or East Asian ancestry. Core clinical syndromes include optic neuritis, acute myelitis, area postrema syndrome, acute brainstem syndrome, acute diencephalic syndrome, and symptomatic cerebral syndrome. First-line treatment options in pediatrics include rituximab, azathioprine, and mycophenolate mofetil. Over half of children with AQP4-IgG seropositive NMOSD develop permanent disability, particularly in visual and motor domains. Novel therapeutic targets in the adult population have been developed and are changing the treatment landscape for this disorder.

Myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG) antibody-associated longitudinally extensive transverse myelitis (LETM) and primary Sjogren syndrome: a rare association

Myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody disease (MOGAD) is a recent addition to the field of central nervous system inflammatory disorders. It can have a wide range of presentations, including optic neuritis, transverse myelitis, acute disseminated encephalomyelitis or any combination of these. The aquaporin-4-positive neuromyelitis optica (NMO) is a close differential owing to the similar clinical presentation. There is a proven association between NMO and autoimmunity, whereas such an association is yet to be established in the case of MOGAD. Here we describe the case of a woman in her 30s presenting with sudden-onset quadriparesis with sensory and autonomic involvement who was diagnosed with MOGAD (cervicothoracic longitudinally extensive transverse myelitis) and found to have primary Sjogren syndrome on further workup. This association between MOGAD and autoimmunity should be kept in mind, as diagnosis of the former should alert the physician to the possibility of the latter's existence and the need to initiate an appropriate workup.

Progress in treatment of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD): Novel insights into therapeutic possibilities in NMOSD

Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is a rare autoimmune inflammatory demyelinating disorder of the central nervous system (CNS), which is a severely disabling disorder leading to devastating sequelae or even death. Repeated acute attacks and the presence of aquaporin-4 immunoglobulin G (AQP4-IgG) antibody are the typical characteristics of NMOSD. Recently, the phase III trials of the newly developed biologicals therapies have shown their effectiveness and good tolerance to a certain extent when compared with the traditional therapy with the first- and second-line drugs. However, there is still a lack of large sample, double-blind, randomized, clinical studies to confirm their efficacy, safety, and tolerability. Especially, these drugs have no clear effect on NMOSD patients without AQP4-IgG and refractory patients. Therefore, it is of strong demand to further conduct large sample, double-blind, randomized, clinical trials, and novel therapeutic possibilities in NMOSD are discussed briefly here.

Comparison of Long-Term Use of Low Dose Rituximab and Mycophenolate Mofetil in Chinese Patients With Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder

Background

Several studies have reported the efficacy and safety of rituximab (RTX) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD). This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of long-term use of low-dose RTX and MMF in Chinese patients with NMOSD.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed data from patients with NMOSD in our hospital. The enrolled patients were administrated different immunosuppressive agents. We accessed annual relapse rate (ARR), neurological disability (Expanded Disability Status Scale, EDSS), time to the next relapse, and adverse events.

Results

EDSS and ARR were both reduced after RTX and MMF treatment. Kaplan-Meier analysis indicated that patients treated with RTX had a longer time to next relapse compared other immunosuppressive agents before RTX (log-rank test: p &lt; 0.001). Furthermore, we evaluated the change of EDSS and ARR in RTX and MMF, and patients treated with RTX showed a better reduction. Eleven relapses from seven patients in group RTX and 20 relapses from 14 patients in group MMF were reported during follow-up.

Conclusion

Long-term using of low dose of RTX and MMF were effective and tolerable in Chinese patients with NMOSD. Compared with MMF, RTX showed a better way to reduce the ARR.

Optic Neuritis in the Era of NMOSD and MOGAD: A Survey of Practice Patterns in Singapore

PURPOSE

The Optic Neuritis Treatment Trial was a landmark study with implications worldwide. In the advent of antibody testing for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disease (NMOSD) and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disease (MOGAD), emerging concepts, such as routine antibody testing and management, remain controversial, resulting mostly from studies in White populations. We evaluate the practice patterns of optic neuritis investigation and management by neuro-ophthalmologists and neurologists in Singapore.

DESIGN

21-question online survey consisting of 4 clinical vignettes.

METHODS

The survey was sent to all Singapore Medical Council- registered ophthalmologists and neurologists who regularly manage patients with optic neuritis.

RESULTS

Forty-two recipients (17 formally trained neuro-ophthalmol-ogists [100% response rate] and 25 neurologists) responded. Participants opted for routine testing of anti-aquaporin-4 antibodies (88.1% in mild optic neuritis and 97.6% in severe optic neuritis). Anti-MOG antibodies were frequently obtained (76.2% in mild and 88.1% in severe optic neuritis). Plasmapheresis was rapidly initiated (85.7%) in cases of nonresponse to intravenous steroids, even before obtaining anti-aquaporin-4 or anti-MOG serology results. In both NMOSD and MOGAD, oral mycophenolate mofetil was the preferred option if chronic immunosuppression was necessary. Steroids were given for a longer duration and tapered more gradually than in idiopathic optic neuritis cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Serological testing for NMOSD and MOGAD is considered as a routine procedure in cases of optic neuritis in Singapore, possibly due to local epidemiological features of these conditions. Chronic oral immunosuppression is preferred for the long term, but further research is necessary to establish the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of these practices.

Results of a Survey on Diagnostic Procedures and Treatment Choices for Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder in Korea: Beyond the Context of Current Clinical Guidelines

Background and Purpose

Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is a rare demyelinating disease of the central nervous system (CNS). We investigated the medical behaviors of experts in Korea when they are diagnosing and treating NMOSD.

Methods

An anonymous questionnaire on the diagnosis and treatment of NMOSD was distributed to experts in CNS demyelinating diseases.

Results

Most respondents used the 2015 diagnostic criteria for NMOSD and applied a cerebrospinal fluid examination, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain and spine, and anti-aquaporin-4 antibody testing to all suspected cases of NMOSD. All respondents prescribed steroid pulse therapy as an first-line therapy in the acute phase of NMOSD, and 67% prescribed azathioprine for maintenance therapy in NMOSD. However, details regarding monitoring, the tapering period of oral steroids, second-line therapy use in refractory cases, management during pregnancy, and schedule of follow-up MRI differed according to the circumstances of individual patients. We analyzed the differences in response rates between two groups of respondents according to the annual number of NMOSD patients that they treated. The group that had been treating ≥10 NMOSD patients annually preferred rituximab more often as the second-line therapy (p=0.011) and had more experience with rituximab treatment (p=0.015) compared with the group that had been treating <10 NMOSD patients.

Conclusions

This study has revealed that NMOSD experts in Korea principally follow the available treatment guidelines. However, the differences in specific clinical practices applied to uncertain cases that have been revealed will need to be investigated further in order to formulate suitable recommendations.

Evaluation of effect of empirical attack-preventive immunotherapies in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders: An update systematic review and meta -analysis

BACKGROUND

Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is an inflammatory disease of the central nervous system, which mainly involves the optic nerve and spinal cord. Frequent relapse can accumulate the degree of disability. At present, the main treatment options are immunosuppressants and blood purification. The first-line immunosuppressants for NMOSD are mainly rituximab (RTX), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and azathioprine (AZA). Therefore, we designed this systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the safety and effect of the above three drugs in the treatment of NMOSD patients.

METHODS

The following Medical Subject Heading (MeSH) and related entry terms are used to search English literature in PubMed, MEDLINE and CENTRAL databases, respectively. MeSH include: Neuromyelitis optic and Rituximab or Azathioprine or Mycophenolate Mofetil; entry terms include: NMO Spectrum Disorder, NMO Spectrum Disorders, Neuromyelitis Optica (NMO) Spectrum Disorder, Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorders, Devic Neuromyelitis Optica, Neuromyelitis Optica, Devic, Devic's Disease, Devic Syndrome, Devic's Neuromyelitis Optica, Neuromyelitis Optica (NMO) Spectrum Disorders, CD20 Antibody, Rituximab CD20 Antibody, Mabthera, IDEC-C2B8 Antibody, GP2013, Rituxan, Mycophenolate Mofetil, Mofetil, Mycophenolate, Mycophenolic Acid, Morpholinoethyl Ester, Cellcept, Mycophenolate Sodium, Myfortic, Mycophenolate Mofetil Hydrochloride, Mofetil Hydrochloride, Mycophenolate, RS 61443, RS-61443, RS61443, azathioprine sodium, azathioprine sulfate (note: literature retrieval operators "AND" "OR" "NOT" are used to link MeSH with Entry Terms.) The literature search found a total of 3058 articles about rituximab, mycophenolate mofetil and azathioprine in the treatment of NMOSD, 63 of which were included in this study after a series of screening.

RESULTS

930,933,732 patients with NMOSD were enrolled, who had been treated with MMF, AZA and RTX, respectively. The pooled standardized mean difference (SMD) of EDSS before and after RTX treated was -0.58 (95%CI: -0.72, -0.44) (I² = 0%, p = 0.477), before and after MMF treated was -0.47 (95%CI: -0.73, -0.21) (I² = 85.6%, p<0.001), before and after AZA treated was -0.41 (95%CI: -0.60, -0.23) (I² = 65.4%, p<0.001). there was no significant difference in the effect of the three drugs on reducing EDSS scores (RTX vs MMF, p = 0.522; RTX vs AZA, p = 0.214; MMF vs AZA, p = 0.732). The pooled standardized mean difference (SMD) of ARR before and after RTX treated was -1.45 (95%CI: -1.72, -1.18) (I² = 72.4%, p<0.001), before and after MMF treated was -1.14 (95%CI: -1.31, -0.97) (I² = 54.5%, p<0.001), before and after AZA treated was -1.11 (95%CI: -1.39, -0.83) (I² = 83.4%, p<0.001). RTX significantly reduced ARR compared with the other two drugs (RTX vs MMF, p = 0.039; RTX vs AZA, p = 0.049; MMF vs AZA, p = 0.436).

CONCLUSION

The results of this systematic review and meta-analysis showed that the treatment of NMOSD patients with RTX, MMF and AZA is associated with decreased number of relapses and disability improvement as well, and there was no significant difference in the effect of the three drugs on reducing EDSS scores, but RTX significantly reduced ARR compared with the other two drugs.

Effective Rituximab Treatment in Patients with Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorders Compared with Azathioprine and Mycophenolate

Introduction

As an autoimmune central nervous system disease characterized by inflammation and demyelination, neuromyelitis optica (NMO) has been extensively investigated. A specific antigenic target, astrocytic water channel aquaporin-4 (AQP4) has already been identified, and it can be recognized explicitly by the autoantibody marker NMO-IgG. Along with the immune attacks, clinical disabilities would gradually accumulate. As there has been no validated and well-recognized therapy for NMO till now, preventing and postponing attack using immunosuppressive therapies is the primary treatment option.

Methods

In the current retrospective study, the effect of immunosuppressive agents was investigated through a long-term follow-up. To assess the long-term effectiveness and safety of rituximab (RTX), azathioprine (AZA), and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) therapies, all 129 patients with NMO spectrum disorders (NMOSD) who received at least one of these treatments were studied, including 55 seropositive for AQP4-Ab and 74 seronegative for AQP4-Ab.

Results

The median post-treatment annualized relapse rate (ARR) was lower than the pre-treatment rates in all AQP4⁺Ab groups (from 1.0 to 0.7 in RTX, from 0.8 to 0.3 in AZA, and from 0.85 to 0.35 in MMF). Meanwhile, the ARR also decreased in all AQP4⁻Ab groups (from 0.3 to 0.2 in RTX, from 0.9 to 0.5 in AZA, and from 0.9 to 0.4 in MMF). Disability condition improved in the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) in all AQP4⁺Ab groups (from 4.0 to 2.75 in RTX, from 3.5 to 2.5 in AZA, and from 3.0 to 2.0 in MMF) and in all AQP4⁻Ab groups (from 3.0 to 2.5 in RTX, from 3.0 to 2.5 in AZA, and from 3.5 to 2.0 in MMF). There was no statistically significant difference between the post-treatment and pre-treatment changes of EDSS and ARR in the RTX, AZA, and MMF groups (P > 0.05). However, according to Kaplan–Meier survival analysis, RTX-treated patients were more likely to be relapse-free after long-term follow-up than those who received AZA or MMF therapy. Meanwhile, adverse effects were noted in three out of 23 patients with RTX treatment, five of 32 with AZA treatment, and three of 21 with MMF treatment. No serious adverse events were observed in all treatment groups during the study.

Conclusions

RTX, AZA, and MMF therapies efficiently lowered the relapse frequency and disability in both of the AQP4-Ab seropositive or seronegative patients with NMO. Furthermore, low dosage of RTX is recommended for the patients with NMO owing to its long-term effectiveness and safety.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40120-021-00298-5.

A meta-analysis comparing first-line immunosuppressants in neuromyelitis optica

Objective

As phase III trials have shown interest in innovative but expensive drugs in the treatment of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD), data are needed to clarify strategies in the treatment of neuromyelitis optica (NMO). This meta‐analysis compares the efficacy of first‐line strategies using rituximab (RTX), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), or azathioprine (AZA), which are still widely used.

Methods

Studies identified by the systematic review of Huang et al. (2019) were selected if they considered at least two first‐line immunosuppressants among RTX, MMF, and AZA. We updated this review. The Medline, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, and ClinicalTrials databases were queried between November 2018 and April 2020. To be included, the hazard ratio (HR) [95% CI] for the time to first relapse after first‐line immunosuppression had to be available, calculable, or provided by the authors.

Results

We gathered data from 919 NMO patients (232 RTX‐, 294 MMF‐, and 393 AZA‐treated patients). The risk of first relapse after first‐line immunosuppression was 1.55 [1.04, 2.31] (p = 0.03) for MMF compared with RTX, 1.42 [0.87, 2.30] (p = 0.16) for AZA compared with RTX, and 0.94 [0.58, 1.54] (p = 0.08) for MMF compared with AZA.

Interpretation

The findings suggest that RTX is more efficient than MMF as a first‐line therapy. Even if the results of our meta‐analysis cannot conclude that RTX has a better efficacy in delaying the first relapse than AZA, the observed effect difference between both treatments combined with the results of previous studies using as outcome the annualized relapse rate may be in favor of RTX.

Comparisons of clinical phenotype, radiological and laboratory features, and therapy of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder by regions: update and challenges

Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is an inflammatory demyelinating disease of the central nervous system (CNS) associated with autoantibody (ab) to aquaporin-4 (AQP4). There is obvious variation between regions and countries in the epidemiology, clinical features and management in NMOSD. Based on published population-based observation and cohort studies, the different clinical pattern of NMOSD has been seen in several geographical regions and some of these patients with NMOSD-like features do not fully meet the current diagnostic criteria, which is needed to consider the value of recently revised diagnostic criteria. At present, all treatments applied in NMOSD have made great progress, however, these treatments failed in AQP4 ab negative and refractory patients. Therefore, it is necessary to turn into an innovative idea and to open a new era of NMOSD treatment to develop novel and diverse targets and effective therapeutic drugs in NMOSD and to conduct the trails in large clinical samples and case-control studies to confirm their therapeutic effects on NMOSD in the future, which still remain a challenge.

Efficacy of mycophenolate mofetil in the treatment of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders: An update systematic review and meta -analysis

BACKGROUND

Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) is an autoimmune astrocyte disease that mainly affects the optic nerve and spinal cord resulting in blindness or paralysis. Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is one of the available immunotherapies with purported beneficial effects for patients with NMOSD. The present review aimed to conduct an update systematic review and meta-analysis for the efficacy of mycophenolate mofetil in the treatment of NMOSD and analyze main factors affecting the efficacy of mycophenolate mofetil.

METHODS

The following Medical Subject Heading (MeSH) and related entry terms are used to search English literature in PubMed, MEDLINE and CENTRAL databases, respectively. MeSH include: Neuromyelitis optic and Mycophenolic Acid; entry terms include: NMO Spectrum Disorder, NMO Spectrum Disorders, Neuromyelitis Optica (NMO) Spectrum Disorder, Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorders, Devic Neuromyelitis Optica, Neuromyelitis Optica, Devic, Devic's Disease, Devic Syndrome, Devic's Neuromyelitis Optica, Neuromyelitis Optica (NMO) Spectrum Disorders, Mycophenolate Mofetil, Mofetil, Mycophenolate, Mycophenolic Acid Morpholinoethyl Ester, Cellcept, Mycophenolate Sodium, Myfortic, Mycophenolate Mofetil Hydrochloride, Mofetil Hydrochloride, Mycophenolate, RS 61,443, RS-61,443, RS61443; (note: literature retrieval operators "AND" "OR" "NOT" are used to link MeSH with Entry Terms.) 30 studies were included in this systematic review and 14 studies were included in meta-analysis. The main efficacy indicators were the difference of the annualized relapse rate (ARR) between before and after mycophenolate mofetil treatments.

RESULTS

In 14 studies involving 930 patients (815 women, 115 men), the ARR were reduced by an average of -1.17 (95%CI, -1.28 to -1.07).

CONCLUSION

Our systematic review and update meta-analysis provide new evidences that mycophenolate mofetil can substantially reduce ARR ratio.

Mortality of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders in a Chinese population

Objective

Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is a rapidly disabling disease. Epidemiologic studies have suggested varying NMOSD mortality across ethnic groups. However, NMOSD mortality data in China are scarce. This study’s objectives were to explore mortality and causes of death among Chinese NMOSD patients and to identify independent predictors of death.

Methods

We performed a retrospective study with a 10‐year follow‐up of Chinese NMOSD patients. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to identify independent predictors of death.

Results

Five hundred and sixty‐nine patients were included; 24 patients died during follow‐up, for overall mortality of 4.2%. In these patients, the median disease duration at the time of death was 3.4 years. The most common cause of death was secondary infection (62.5%), especially respiratory infection (45.8%). The second most common cause of death was extensive cervical myelitis with respiratory failure (16.7%). Other causes included suicide (8.3%), cancer (4.2%), cerebral embolism (4.2%), and unknown causes (4.2%). The multivariate Cox analyses indicated that a short first interattack interval (HR = 0.93, 95% CI 0.89–0.98, p = 0.003), lack of regular immunotherapy (HR = 10.34, 95% CI 4.05–26.37, p < 0.001), and older age at onset were independent predictors of death. Every increasing decade of onset age increased the risk of death 2.59 times (95% CI 1.74–3.86, p < 0.001).

Interpretation

Infections were more common in patients not treated with any immunotherapy, indicating that early and consequent immunotherapy might prevent death by infections, which is of great importance for further treatment of NMOSD patients to avoid undertreatment due to fear of treatment‐associated infections.

Differential efficacy of mycophenolate mofetil in adults with relapsing myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disorders

BACKGROUND

Myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein-immunoglobulin (MOG-IgG) associated disorder (MOGAD) has been recognized as a distinct disease entity with recurrent attacks. But the standard therapeutic approach to reduce relapses is unknown. Different doses of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) are frequently used in MOGAD. We aimed to investigate the response to stratified doses of MMF in adult patients with MOGAD.

METHODS

We determined the frequency of relapses in patients receiving various doses of MMF treatment for MOGAD. Patients were reviewed for relapses before and during long-term treatment. Cox proportional hazards models were used to analyze the correlation between the MMF dosage and the annualized relapse rate (ARR) as well as clinical features.

RESULTS

22 patients receiving low-dose MMF (< 1000 mg/day), 19 patients receiving moderate-dose MMF (1000 mg/day ≤ MMF dose < 2000 mg/day) and 21 patients receiving high-dose MMF (≥ 2000 mg/day) were collected in our cohort. Cox regression analysis showed that high-dose MMF treatment significantly reduced the risk of relapses (HR 0.501 [95% CI 0.268-0.934], p = 0.030) compared with low-dose and moderate-dose of MMF treatment, after adjusted by age, gender, disease duration and prednisone therapy. Patients (13/62) concomitant with autoimmune diseases, had a higher proportion of relapses (76.92%) compared with those without autoimmune diseases (18.37%) (HR = 5.96, 95% CI 1.73-20.48, p < 0.001). The overall median ARR reduced from 1.13 to 0.32 under high-dose MMF treatment (p = 0.004). However, there was no significant reduction in ARR either in patients with low-dose or those with moderate-dose of MMF.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that high-dose of MMF treatment may reduce recurrent demyelinating attacks, with the lowest ARR. Randomized controlled studies are required to validate the effective therapeutic regimen.

Drug Treatment of Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorders: Out with the Old, in with the New?

Introduction

Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) are rare neuroinflammatory demyelinating diseases of the CNS, mainly affecting optic nerves, spinal cord and brainstem regions. The diagnosis depends on clinical symptoms, MRI findings and the detection of autoantibodies against the water channel aquaporin 4 (AQP4-Ab). This autoantibody is particularly important for diagnostic sensitivity and specificity and further sets the course for major therapeutic decisions. Due to a relapsing course with the accumulation of disability, relapse prevention by immunotherapy is crucial in NMOSD. Until recently, disease-modifying agents specific to NMOSD were not available, and patients were treated with various immunosuppressive drugs and regimens - with variable success. Fortunately, since 2019, three new therapeutic antibodies have entered the market.

Areas Covered

We aim to shortly summarise the pathogenesis and biological targets for acute and preventive therapy of adult NMOSD. We will focus on conventional immunotherapies and the recently approved novel biological drugs satralizumab, eculizumab and inebilizumab, and conclude with a brief outlook on future therapeutic approaches.

Expert Opinion

Although satralizumab, eculizumab and inebilizumab are a breakthrough concerning short-term efficacy, important questions on their future use remain open. There is no data from head-to-head comparisons, and data on long-term safety and efficacy of the new medicines are pending. Whether any of the biologics are efficacious in AQP4-Ab negative NMOSD patients is not yet known – as is how they will succeed in non-responders to conventional immunotherapies. Further, (autoimmune) comorbidities, affordability, and market availability of drugs may be decisive factors for choosing treatments in the near future. We are fortunate to have these new drugs available now, but they will not immediately supersede established off-label drugs in this indication. It is still too early to definitively revise the treatment algorithms for NMOSD - although we are probably on the way.

Spectrum of Myelitis in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Experience from a Single Tertiary Care Centre over 25 Years

BACKGROUND

Inflammatory myelitis rarely occurs in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE).

METHODS

Medical records from a tertiary care centre in India (1989-2018) were reviewed to identify patients with myelitis in SLE and their clinical characteristics and outcomes were compared with two matching comparators drawn from adjacent hospital registration numbers in the SLE database.

RESULTS

Ten patients had myelitis from a cohort of 1768 patients with SLE. Myelitis was the first manifestation of lupus in 7 (70%). Cervicothoracic cord was most frequent site of involvement. ANA was negative at onset in 2 cases. One of 4 was positive for Anti-Aquaporin 4 antibody. Four had relapsing disease (16 events) with a median time to relapse of 0.65 years (0.3- 7 years). All cases received steroid sparing agents over the follow-up duration (78.5 patient years). Lupus nephritis (20% vs. 75%, p=0.004) and haematologic manifestations (0 vs. 25%, p=0.02) were less common. Higher frequency of anti-Ro antibodies was noted in the group with myelitis (p=0.05).

CONCLUSION

Myelitis can be a presenting feature of SLE with lupus nephritis and hematologic involvement being rare. Relapses are common that mandate long-term immunosuppression.

Effectiveness of treatments in Neuromyelitis optica to modify the course of disease in adult patients. Systematic review of literature

BACKGROUND

Neuromyelitis Optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is an inflammatory disease, which manifests mostly as recurrent episodes of optic neuritis or myelitis that cause important disability. Early diagnosis and prompt initiation of immunosuppressive therapy are crucial in reducing relapses, disability, and mortality. Even though, there are few prospective randomized controlled trials, several drugs have proved to be both effective and safe. Azathioprine and Rituximab represent the standard of care and are used as first-line treatment agents worldwide. However, recent studies have unveiled new therapies, such as monoclonal antibodies. To make treatment recommendations and management guidelines, it is imperative to define an appropriate standard of care.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was performed in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and LILACS databases using the following terms: "(NMO OR Devic OR Neuromyelitis Optica) AND (Azathioprine OR Prednisone OR Rituximab OR Tocilizumab OR Bortezomib OR Inebilizumab OR Eculizumab OR Satralizumab)" including both, randomized clinical trials and observational studies published between January 2006 and January 2021. The inclusion criteria comprised patients aged 18 or older, NMOSD diagnosis following the Wingerchuck criteria, two or more therapies been compared, and the evaluation of both efficacy and safety outcomes. All studies comparing treatment only with placebo were excluded. Quality was assessed according with the design of the study, and results were synthesized through comparative tables for each outcome evaluated, differentiating the results of randomized and non-randomized studies.

RESULTS

Thirteen studies with 1447 patients were included. Twelve studies evaluated the expanded disability status scale (EDSS) before and after treatment; in five of seven evaluating rituximab, it outperformed its comparators in improving the disability degree. Eleven studies assessed the annual relapse rate (ARR). Again, in six of seven evaluating rituximab, it was superior to other therapies. Time to relapse (TTR) was reported in five studies. The three studies that included Rituximab revealed a longer time to relapse in this arm of treatment. Finding were consistent in randomized and non-randomized studies. The new molecules Satralizumab, Eculizumab and Tocilizumab were evaluated in one study each, proving to be highly effective and safe. The safety profile analysis showed a higher number of adverse events for Azathioprine.

DISCUSSION

This systematic review demonstrates a superiority tendency of Rituximab upon the other treatments strengthening the available evidence about NMOSD management. Superiority in EDSS outcomes, annual relapse rate, time to first relapse and relapses during treatment time was evidenced in the Rituximab group compared to other medications, with lower rates of adverse events. New molecules Tocilizumab, Eculizumab and Satralizumab also showed superiority in the evaluated results, especially in the relapses during treatment time outcome, although with subtle differences in EDSS and ARR outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that monoclonal antibodies are highly effective and safe for the treatment of NMOSD; Rituximab showed better performance on multiple outcomes and has more evidence available. New molecules: Eculizumab, Tocilizumab, Satralizumab are good options for treatment. Drugs like Azathioprine and Mycophenolate are effective, but with a worse risk-benefit ratio, therefore, they are useful alternatives in places that do not have access to monoclonal antibodies.

Comparison of clinical characteristics and prognoses in patients with different AQP4-Ab and MOG-Ab serostatus with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders

BACKGROUND

At present, patients positive for aquaporin-4 antibody (AQP4-Ab) or myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody (MOG-Ab) are diagnosed as neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) and MOG-Ab-associated diseases, respectively. However, some patients who meet the diagnostic criteria for NMOSD and show demyelination of the central nervous system cannot be clearly classified.

METHODS

We performed a prospective cohort study to evaluate the clinical characteristics and prognoses of double-seronegative patients with NMOSD.

RESULTS

A total of 594 patients were included in the cohort, including 26 patients with MOG-Ab, 517 with AQP4-Ab, and 51 with double seronegativity. Compared to AQP4-Ab-positive patients, double-seronegative patients experienced less severe clinical attacks (51.0% vs. 78.1%; P^corr < 0.01), either visual (23.5% vs. 42.6%; P^corr = 0.024) or motor attacks (39.2% vs. 59.8%; P^corr = 0.015), and had a better median Expand Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score at the last follow-up (2.0 vs. 3.0; P^corr = 0.012) and a lower proportion of disability (11.8% vs. 30.9%; P^corr = 0.015). Furthermore, lower risks of visual and motor disability were also observed by Kaplan-Meier analyses (P = 0.031 and 0.038, respectively). Both the MOG-Ab and double-seronegative groups had lower frequencies of severe clinical attacks, especially motor attacks, better EDSS scores at the last visit, and a lower proportion of disability than was found in the AQP4-Ab group (all P values and corrected P values <0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients who met the diagnostic criteria for NMOSD, compared with AQP4-Ab-seropositive patients, double-seronegative and MOG-Ab-seropositive patients had less severe clinical attacks and better prognoses, including lower EDSS scores and a lower proportion of disability.

Optimal management of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder with aquaporin-4 antibody by oral prednisolone maintenance therapy

BACKGROUND

Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is a relapsing neuroinflammatory disease associated with aquaporin-4 antibody. Since disabilities in patients with NMOSD accumulate with attacks, relapse prevention is crucially important for improving long-term outcomes. Corticosteroids are inexpensive and promising drugs for relapse prevention in NMOSD, but few studies have analysed the efficacy of corticosteroids in NMOSD, especially regarding the appropriate dosing and tapering regimens.

METHODS

A single-center, retrospective analysis of corticosteroid therapy in aquaporin-4 antibody-positive NMOSD patients fulfilling the 2015 international consensus diagnostic criteria was conducted.

RESULTS

Medical records of a total of 89 Japanese patients with aquaporin-4 antibody-positive NMOSD seen at Department of Neurology, Tohoku University Hospital (2000~2016) were reviewed. At the last follow-up, 66% of the patients were treated with prednisolone (PSL) monotherapy, and the percentage of those receiving PSL monotherapy or a combination of PSL and other immunosuppressants increased from 17.5% in 2000 to 94.1% in 2016. On the other hand, annualised relapse rate (ARR) decreased from 0.78 (13 attacks in 200 person-months) in 2000 to 0.07 (5 attacks in 819 person-months) in 2016. Under PSL treatment, the mean ARR significantly decreased, and disabilities stabilized (PSL treatment vs no-medication; ARR: 0.21 vs 0.98, P < 0.01, Expanded Disability Status Scale score change: +0.02 vs +0.89, P < 0.01, observation periods: 60.1 vs 68.2 months, P=0.26). Using Kaplan-Meier curves, the 10-year relapse-free rate was 46.5% with PSL monotherapy and 7.1% with no medication (hazard ratio: 0.069, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.024-0.199, P < 0.01). Rapid tapering of PSL (10 mg or less in one year and/or 5 mg or less in two years after clinical attacks) was associated with frequent relapses compared to gradual tapering (more than 10 mg in one year and more than 5 mg in two years after clinical attacks) (rapid vs gradual, 36.7% vs 17.7%, odds ratio 2.69, 95% CI 1.12-6.44, P = 0.02). However, even with PSL of 5 mg/day or less, the relapse rate was low after two years of acute treatment (before vs after, 53.8% vs 13.6%, odds ratio 0.12, 95% CI 0.03-0.50, P < 0.01). Nine patients needed additional immunosuppressants due to insufficient relapse prevention by PSL monotherapy. PSL monotherapy was generally well tolerated, but seven patients had severe adverse events, mainly bone fractures (5 with bone fracture, 1 with femoral capital necrosis and 1 with cerebral infarction).

CONCLUSION

Our study suggests that PSL monotherapy is effective to prevent relapses in about half of patients with aquaporin-4 antibody-positive NMOSD if the doses are gradually reduced. Although it is important to have a treatment strategy tailored to each patient, this study provides evidence that PSL monotherapy can be an option for relapse prevention in some patients with NMOSD.

Safety and efficacy of mycophenolate mofetil in treating neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders: a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) is an inflammatory and heterogeneous astrocyte disorder of the central nervous system with the characteristic of higher incidence in women and Asian people. Most patients with NMOSD have a course of recurrence and remission that is prone to cause paralysis and blindness. Several studies have confirmed the efficacy and promising prospect of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in the treatment of NMOSD. Yet its therapeutic effect and safety are controversial. Although there has been two published literature that is relevant to the topic of this study, both of them have certain defects, and they can only provide answers about the efficacy or safety of MMF in the treatment of NMOSD from partial perspectives or conclusions. This research aims to perform a direct and comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate MMF's effectiveness and safety in treating NMOSD.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This systematic review will cover all comparative researches, from randomised controlled trials to cohort studies, and case-control study. A relevant literature search will be conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Database, China Science and Technology Journal Database and Chinese Biomedical Literature Database from their inception to 31 June 2020. We will also search registers of clinical trials, potential grey literature and abstracts from conferences. There are no limits on language and publication status. The reporting quality and risk of bias will be assessed by two researchers independently. Expanded Disability Status Scales and annualised relapse rate will be evaluated as the primary outcome. The secondary outcomes will consist of the frequency and severity of adverse events, best-corrected visual acuity, relapse-free rate and time to the next attack. A meta-analysis will be performed using RevMan V.5.3 software provided by the Cochrane Collaboration and Stata V.12.0.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Because the data used for this systematic review will be exclusively extracted from published studies, ethical approval and informed consent of patients will not be required. The systematic review will be published in a peer-reviewed journal, presented at conferences and will be shared on social media platforms.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42020164179.

Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders

The disease concept of Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorders(NMOSD) has undergone a significant change over the last two decades including the detection of Myelin Oligodendrocyte Glycoprotein(MOG) antibody in patients who are seronegative for aquaporin-4 antibody. Aquaporin-4 antibody positive NMOSD is now regarded as an immune astrocytopathy. Conversely, MOG antibody associated disease is known to target myelin rather than astrocytes, leading to an NMOSD syndrome with distinct clinical and radiological features. Incorporation of clinical features like area postrema syndrome, brainstem syndrome, diencephalic syndrome and cortical manifestations as core clinical characteristics into the revised diagnostic criteria has widened the clinical spectrum of NMOSD. With the development of these criteria, it is possible to make the diagnosis at an earlier stage so that effective immunosuppression can be instituted promptly for a better long-term prognosis. Newer therapeutic agents have been introduced for aquaporin-4 seropositive NMOSD disease; however, challenges remain in treating seronegative disease because of limited treatment options.

Efficacy and safety of mycophenolate mofetil therapy in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is an immunosuppressive agent (IS) which is widely prescribed in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) patients. We aim to assess the efficacy and safety of MMF in controlling relapse and disease severity. Eligible studies obtained from the EMBASE and Ovid MEDLINE databases were studies of NMOSD patients treated with MMF, which reported treatment outcomes as Annualized Relapse Rate (ARR) or Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) before and after treatment. Fifteen studies included 1047 patients, of whom 915 (87.4%) were aquaporin-4 immunoglobulin seropositive. The total number of patients that received MMF was 799. A meta-analysis on ARR was conducted in 200 patients from 4 studies and on EDSS in 158 patients from 3 studies. The result showed a significant improvement with a mean reduction of 1.13 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.60-1.65] in ARR, and a mean reduction of 0.85 (95% CI 0.36-1.34) in EDSS after MMF therapy. Adverse events occurred in 106 (17.8%) of 594 patients during MMF therapy. This systematic review and meta-analysis showed that using MMF as a preventive therapy in NMOSD patients can significantly reduce relapse rates and improve disease severity with acceptable tolerability.

Efficacy and safety of azathioprine for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders: A meta-analysis of real-world studies

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to perform a meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of azathioprine (AZA) for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD), considering the potential predictive factors related to patient response to AZA in this disease.

METHODS

We performed a systematic online query in PubMed, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, WANFANG DATA, and CQVIP DATA. The available studies on the use of AZA in NMOSD patients were included.

RESULTS

We analyzed a total of 21 studies including 1016 patients. Results demonstrated that AZA significantly decreased annual relapse rate (ARR) by 1.164 (95% confidence intervals (CI), -1.396 to -0.932; p < 0.001). Subgroup analysis showed that AZA significantly decreased ARR in both low-dose group (effect size (ES): -1.545) and moderate-dose group (ES: -2.026). AZA therapy also resulted in a significant reduction of 1.117 (95% CI: -1.668 to -0.566; p < 0.001) in expanded disability status scale (EDSS) score. AZA did not affect EDSS score in the low-dose subgroup (ES: -0.535; p = 0.209) or the moderate-dose subgroup (ES: -0.709; p = 0.064). During AZA therapy, 47% of patients did not experience any relapses (95% CI, 39% to 54%). In addition, 13% of patients developed leukopenia, 11% had elevated liver enzyme levels, 8% experienced nausea or vomiting, 5% developed pancytopenia and 6% died during follow-up.

CONCLUSION

AZA is effective in reducing relapse and improving patients' neurological function. However, liver function monitoring and routine blood monitoring remain necessary. Within the safe upper limit, a higher dose of AZA may be associated with a better efficacy for NMOSD.

Decision-making on management of ms and nmosd patients during the COVID-19 pandemic: A latin american survey

•

In this COVID-19 context, there is an urgent necessity of sharing information to enable evidence-based decision making on the clinical management.

•

In LATAM, 60% of the experts had the possibility of monitoring their patients by telemedicine.

•

Most neurologists postpone magnetic resonance and laboratory blood tests delay is associated with the type of MS or NMOSD treatment.

•

Platform therapies, dimethyl-fumarate and natalizumab are considered safe options to initiate in naive patients.

Background

The emergence of COVID-19 and its vertiginous spreading speed represents a unique challenge to neurologists managing multiple sclerosis (MS) and neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD). The need for data on the impact of the virus on these patients grows rapidly. There is an urgent necessity of sharing information to enable evidence-based decision making on the clinical management. There are no data on what physicians are doing on clinical practice in Latin American countries.

Aim

to investigate current management opinion of Latin American MS and/or NMOSD expert neurologists based on their experience and recommendations.

Methods

we developed a voluntary web-based survey based on hypothetical situations that these patients may encounter, while taking into account the potential risk of developing severe COVID-19 infection.

Results

60% of the experts had the possibility of monitoring their patients by telemedicine. Most neurologists postpone magnetic resonance. Laboratory blood tests delay is associated with the type of treatment. Platform therapies, dimethyl-fumarate and natalizumab are considered safe options to initiate in naive patients.

Conclusion

decision-making about MS and NMOSD patients has become even more complex in order to adapt to the COVID-19 pandemic. Risks and benefits should be taken into consideration throughout the patient follow-up.

Prevalence and Incidence of Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder in Korea: Population Based Study

BACKGROUND

Although neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is known to be a rare disease, its prevalence and incidence have not yet been studied in Korea. We performed a population-based study to examine the prevalence and incidence of NMOSD in Korea using data from the Korean National Health Insurance (NHI) claims database.

METHODS

Data from 2013 to 2017 were obtained, with a washout period set as 2013 and 2014. The prevalence and incidence of NMOSD in 2016 and 2017 were calculated using population census data. Subjects were divided into 5 groups at 15-year intervals, depending on the age at which the diagnostic code was entered. The relative risk (RR) for each age group was compared with the oldest (≥ 60 years) age group.

RESULTS

The overall prevalence was estimated to be 3.36 and 3.56 per 100,000 individuals, with an incidence of 0.41 and 0.65 per 100,000 individuals-year in 2016 and 2017, respectively. The mean age was 43.08 (standard deviation, 14.56) years, and the ratio of male to females was 1:4.7. The incidence was higher in female individuals aged between 30 and 59 years (RR, 2.8-3.05; P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Nationwide prevalence of NMOSD in Korea was 3.36 and 3.56/100,000 and its incidence was 0.41 and 0.65/100,000-year in 2016 and 2017 respectively.

Treatment of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review discusses concepts for diagnosing neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD), distinguishing NMOSD from other inflammatory diseases of the central nervous system, and highlights recent and forthcoming data on acute and maintenance therapy of NMOSD.

RECENT FINDINGS

The neurologic manifestations of NMOSD are heterogenous, extending beyond classic presentations of optic neuritis and longitudinally extensive transverse myelitis. NMOSD may be comorbid with rheumatologic diseases, such as systemic lupus erythematosus, but is recognized as a distinct entity. Recent studies of acute treatment of NMOSD support early use of plasmapheresis. Relapse prevention is essential, as relapses can be disabling and patients may have only partial recovery. Current practice generally recommends at least 5 years of maintenance treatment. Recent randomized data demonstrates superiority of rituximab over azathioprine. Phase 3 trials have recently been completed or are underway studying novel therapies employing B-cell depletion, complement inhibition, and cell-based mechanisms (among other mechanisms) for maintenance therapy of NMOSD.

SUMMARY

NMOSD is a heterogeneous but well-defined clinical entity, distinct from other neurologic and systemic inflammatory diseases, and treatment is poised for expansion.

Evaluation of efficacy and tolerability of first-line therapies in NMOSD

Objective

To compare the efficacy and the risk of severe infectious events of immunosuppressive agents used early as first-line therapy in patients with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD).

Methods

We retrospectively included patients with NMOSD and a seropositive status for aquaporin 4 or myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibodies beginning first-line immunosuppressants within 3 years after the disease onset. The main outcome was occurrence of relapse after the initiation of immunosuppressants; the secondary outcome was the annual relapse rate (AAR).

Results

A total of 136 patients were included: 62 (45.6%) were treated with rituximab (RTX), 42 (30.9%) with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), and 23 (16.9%) with azathioprine (AZA). Compared with RTX-treated patients, the risk of relapse was higher among MMF-treated patients (hazard ratio [HR], 2.74 [1.17–6.40]; p = 0.020) after adjusting for age at disease onset, sex, antibody status, disease duration, ARR before treatment, corticosteroid intake, and relapse location. We did not observe any difference between RTX-treated and AZA-treated patients (HR, 2.13 [0.72–6.28]; p = 0.17). No interaction was found between the antibody status and immunosuppressive treatments. ARR was lower with RTX than with MMF (p = 0.039), but no difference was observed with AZA. We observed 9 serious infectious events with MMF, 6 with RTX, and none with AZA.

Conclusions

The use of first-line RTX in NMOSD appears more effective than MMF in suppressing clinical activity, independent of the antibody status.

Classification of evidence

That study provides Class III evidence that for patients with NMOSD, first-line RTX is superior to MMF to reduce the risk of relapse.

Cost effectiveness of rituximab and mycophenolate mofetil for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder in Thailand: Economic evaluation and budget impact analysis

Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is an inflammatory condition of the central nervous system. The extent of disability depends on the severity of the disease and the number of relapses. Although azathioprine is currently the main treatment for patients with NMOSD in Thailand, patients often relapse during its use. Hence, it is argued that there are other drugs that would be more effective. The purpose of this study is to evaluate, from a societal perspective and from the economic impact on Thailand’s healthcare system, the cost utility of treatment with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and rituximab in patients resistant to azathioprine. The Markov model with a one-year cycle length was applied to predict the health and cost outcomes in patients with NMOSD over a lifetime. The results showed that rituximab exhibited the highest quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gains among all the options. Among the rituximab-based treatments, the administration of a rituximab biosimilar with CD27⁺ memory B cell monitoring proved to be the most cost-effective option. At the willingness-to-pay threshold of 160,000 Thai baht (THB), or 5,289 US dollar (USD), per QALY gained, the treatment exhibited the highest probability of being cost effective (48%). A sensitivity analysis based on the adjusted price of a generic MMF determined that the treatment was cost effective, exhibiting an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of -164,653 THB (-5,443 USD) and a 32% probability of being cost effective. The calculated budget impact of treating patients resistant to conventional therapy was 1–6 million THB (33,000–198,000 USD) for the first three years, while after the third year, the budget impact stabilized at 3–4 million THB (99,000–132,000 USD). These data indicate that, in Thailand, treatment of drug resistant NMOSD with a rituximab biosimilar with CD27⁺ memory B cell monitoring or treatment with a generic MMF would be cost effective and would result in a low budget impact. Therefore, the inclusion of both the rituximab biosimilar and a generic MMF in the National Drug List of Essential Medicine for the treatment of NMOSD may be appropriate.

Decreased mRNA Expressions of CD40L in Patients with Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder

Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is an autoimmune disease that preferentially affects central nerve system. Herein, we evaluated changes of CD40L and CD40 mRNA expressions in NMOSD and controls to explore their potential roles in development of NMOSD. The expressions of CD40L and CD40 mRNA in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from patients with NMOSD and healthy controls were detected by quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR). Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to compare expression levels of CD40L and CD40 mRNA between groups, and Spearman correlation analysis was performed to evaluate correlation between mRNA expression levels and annual relapse rate (ARR) of NMOSD. A total of 71 patients with NMOSD and 42 gender- and age-matched healthy volunteers were recruited in our study. Compared with healthy controls, expression of CD40L mRNA was significantly decreased in untreated patients with NMOSD, and similar trends were observed also in CD40 mRNA expression although the difference was not significant. Other than that, immunosuppressants not only successfully increased CD40L and CD40 mRNA levels during remission of NMOSD, but also corrected the negative correlation between CD40L mRNA expression and annual relapse rate (ARR) of patients NMOSD. These results favored the long-term prognosis of NMOSD patients. Our results suggest that decreased expressions of CD40L mRNA may be involved in developing of NMOSD and the proper CD40L mRNA levels benefit to prevent attacks of NMOSD. Nevertheless, the relationship between protein and mRNA expressions of CD40L and their underlying roles in the pathogenesis of NMOSD remains to be further studied.

Efficacy and tolerability of mycophenolate mofetil in a pediatric Rasmussen syndrome

Rasmussen syndrome (RS) is a chronic encephalopathy with uncertain etiology and immune-mediated pathogenesis. The only definitive treatment is represented by functional hemispherectomy. We describe the case of a 6.5-year-old female patient who developed several episodes of focal, unilateral clonic seizures. Following laboratory and instrumental investigations, the patient was diagnosed as having RS. A treatment with corticosteroids, intravenous immunoglobulin, and the antiseizure medication (carbamazepine and levetiracetam) did not completely control the seizures. Therefore, the patient was treated with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), showing a good clinical response, with reduction of the seizures, and stability of the radiological findings. This case suggests the potential utility of MMF in the immune approach to RS.

•

Rasmussen encephalitis (RE) is an immune-mediated disease of unknown etiology.

•

Current definitive treatment for RE is represented by hemispherectomy.

•

The immune approach of RE has been performed with several agents.

•

In this case, mycophenolate mofetil was successfully used in a patient with RE.

Effectiveness and tolerability of immunosuppressants and monoclonal antibodies in preventive treatment of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Several immunosuppressants or monoclonal antibodies have been used as preventive treatment for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD); however, the optimal therapies have not been clarified. In this study, we aimed to compare and rank the effectiveness and tolerability of all preventive therapies for NMOSD.

METHODS

Qualified studies were identified in a search of MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and ClinicalTrials.gov databases. We combined direct and indirect evidence via meta-analyses. The annualized relapse rate (ARR) was defined as the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score and hazard ratios (HR) for the counts of adverse events (AEs).

RESULTS

We identified one randomized controlled trial (RCT) and five observational studies including a total 631 patients with NMOSD. Among these, the follow-up time ranged from 12 to 40 months. For the primary outcome, rituximab (RTX) was hierarchically superior, with the significant standardized mean difference versus azathioprine (-0.86; 95% confidence interval: -1.60, -0.11). Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) was ranked the most tolerable therapy, whereas cyclophosphamide was the least tolerable.

CONCLUSION

RTX and MMF may be recommended as optimal treatments to prevent relapse in NMOSD. Low-dose cyclosporine A could be a promising alternative therapy.

Mycophenolate mofetil in paediatric autoimmune or immune-mediated diseases of the central nervous system: clinical experience and recommendations

AIM

To gather data on mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in paediatric autoimmune/immune-mediated central nervous system (CNS) conditions, focusing on safety and factors that may affect MMF efficacy.

METHOD

Retrospective, multicentre study based on four paediatric neurology centres.

RESULTS

Forty-four children were included (30 females, 14 males): 19 had proven/suspected autoimmune encephalitis, 14 had inflammatory demyelinating CNS diseases, and 11 had other autoimmune/immune-mediated CNS conditions. Before MMF, all received first-line immune therapies, and 17 had second-line rituximab and/or cyclophosphamide. MMF was started at a median of 9.5 months from disease onset (range 1-127mo) (median age 9y 4mo, range 1y 5mo-16y 5mo), and was used for median 18 months (range 0.3-73mo). On MMF, 31 patients were relapse-free, whereas eight relapsed (excluding patients with chronic-progressive course). Relapses on MMF were associated with medication weaning/cessation, or with suboptimal MMF dosage/duration. Adverse events of MMF occurred in eight patients: six moderate (gastrointestinal, movement disorder, dermatological) and two severe (infectious).

INTERPRETATION

MMF use in paediatric neuroimmunology is heterogeneous, although relatively safe. We have identified factors that may affect MMF efficacy and provide recommendations on MMF usage.

WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) use was heterogeneous with relatively common adverse events, although mostly not severe. MMF treatment reduced median annualized relapse rate, although 20% of patients relapsed on MMF. A high relapse rate pre-MMF and late MMF start were associated with higher probability of relapsing on MMF. Most relapses were associated with suboptimal MMF dosage, short MMF duration, or concurrent medication weaning/discontinuation.

Mycophenolate mofetil, azathioprine and methotrexate usage in paediatric anti-NMDAR encephalitis: A systematic literature review

BACKGROUND

Available data on mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), azathioprine (AZA) and methotrexate (MTX) for paediatric-onset anti-N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor encephalitis (anti-NMDARE) is limited.

METHODS

Systematic literature review on patients treated with MMF/AZA/MTX for paediatric-onset anti-NMDARE, with focus on modes of use, efficacy and safety.

RESULTS

87 patients were included (age at onset median 11 years, range 0.8-18 years; 69% females). 46% had a relapsing course. 52% received MMF, 27% AZA, 15% MTX, and 6% a combination of MMF/AZA/MTX (7 patients received intrathecal MTX). Before MMF/AZA/MTX, 100% patients received steroids, 83% intravenous immunoglobulin and 45% plasma exchange, and 50% received second-line treatments (rituximab/cyclophosphamide). MMF/AZA/MTX were administered >6 months from onset in 51%, and only after relapse in 40%. Worst mRS before MMF/AZA/MTX was median 4.5 (range 3-5). At last follow-up (median 2 years, range 0.2-8.6), median mRS was 1 (range 0-6). Median annualised relapse rate was 0.4 (range 0-6.7) pre-MMF/AZA/MTX (excluding first events), and 0 on MMF/AZA/MTX (mean 0.03, range 0-0.8). 7% patients relapsed on MMF/AZA/MTX. These relapsing patients had low rate of second-line treatments before MMF/AZA/MTX (25%), long median time between onset and MMF/AZA/MTX usage (18 months), and frequently they were started on MMF/AZA/MTX only after relapse (75%). Relapse rate was lower among patients who received first immune therapy ≤30 days (25%) than later (64%), who received second-line treatments at first event (14%) rather than not (64%), who were started on MMF/AZA/MTX after the first (12%) rather than subsequent events (17%), and who were started on MMF/AZA/MTX ≤3 months from onset (33%) rather than later (53%). Adverse reactions to MMF/AZA/MTX occurred in 2 cases (cytomegalovirus colitis and respiratory infection), of grade 3 Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.0.

DISCUSSION

Our literature review disclosed heterogeneity in the use of MMF/AZA/MTX in paediatric-onset anti-NMDARE. MMF/AZA/MTX usage is mostly restricted to retrospective cohort descriptions. These agents may reduce risk of relapse, and have a reasonable safety profile, however data on larger cohorts are required to definitively determine effect.

Individualized B cell-targeting therapy for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder

Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is an autoimmune inflammatory disease of the central nervous system characterized by severe attacks of optic neuritis (ON), longitudinally extensive transverse myelitis (LETM), and area postrema syndrome. The majority of patients with NMOSD are seropositive for autoantibodies against the astrocyte water channel aquaporin-4 (AQP4). As convergent clinical and laboratory-based investigations have indicated that B cells play a fundamental role in NMO immunopathology, B cells have become an attractive therapeutic target. Rituximab is a therapeutic monoclonal antibody against CD20 expressed on B cells and increasingly used for the treatment of NMOSD. Although there is robust evidence for the efficacy and safety of rituximab in NMOSD, considerable variability has been noted in biological and clinical responses in patients. Therefore, the focus now is on understanding the mechanisms underlying the variability in response to rituximab and optimizing the use of rituximab for NMOSD. Identification of biomarkers for prediction of clinical response, and effective dosing and timing of treatment may provide useful tools for patient-tailored treatment in NMOSD. Herein, we review current evidence on factors that affect biological and clinical responses to rituximab and highlight the importance of individualized therapies for NMOSD.