1
|
Nguyen PT, Makowiecki K, Lewis TS, Fortune AJ, Clutterbuck M, Reale LA, Taylor BV, Rodger J, Cullen CL, Young KM. Low intensity repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation enhances remyelination by newborn and surviving oligodendrocytes in the cuprizone model of toxic demyelination. Cell Mol Life Sci 2024; 81:346. [PMID: 39134808 PMCID: PMC11335270 DOI: 10.1007/s00018-024-05391-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2023] [Revised: 07/30/2024] [Accepted: 08/01/2024] [Indexed: 08/22/2024]
Abstract
In people with multiple sclerosis (MS), newborn and surviving oligodendrocytes (OLs) can contribute to remyelination, however, current therapies are unable to enhance or sustain endogenous repair. Low intensity repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (LI-rTMS), delivered as an intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS), increases the survival and maturation of newborn OLs in the healthy adult mouse cortex, but it is unclear whether LI-rTMS can promote remyelination. To examine this possibility, we fluorescently labelled oligodendrocyte progenitor cells (OPCs; Pdgfrα-CreER transgenic mice) or mature OLs (Plp-CreER transgenic mice) in the adult mouse brain and traced the fate of each cell population over time. Daily sessions of iTBS (600 pulses; 120 mT), delivered during cuprizone (CPZ) feeding, did not alter new or pre-existing OL survival but increased the number of myelin internodes elaborated by new OLs in the primary motor cortex (M1). This resulted in each new M1 OL producing ~ 471 µm more myelin. When LI-rTMS was delivered after CPZ withdrawal (during remyelination), it significantly increased the length of the internodes elaborated by new M1 and callosal OLs, increased the number of surviving OLs that supported internodes in the corpus callosum (CC), and increased the proportion of axons that were myelinated. The ability of LI-rTMS to modify cortical neuronal activity and the behaviour of new and surviving OLs, suggests that it may be a suitable adjunct intervention to enhance remyelination in people with MS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Phuong Tram Nguyen
- Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia
| | - Kalina Makowiecki
- Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia
| | - Thomas S Lewis
- Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia
| | - Alastair J Fortune
- Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia
| | - Mackenzie Clutterbuck
- Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia
| | - Laura A Reale
- Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia
| | - Bruce V Taylor
- Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia
| | - Jennifer Rodger
- School of Biological Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia
- Perron Institute for Neurological and Translational Science, Nedlands, WA, Australia
| | - Carlie L Cullen
- Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia
- Mater Research Institute, The University of Queensland, Woolloongabba, QLD, Australia
| | - Kaylene M Young
- Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Nguyen PT, Zarghami A, Makowiecki K, Stevens N, Ezegbe C, Kyle K, Wang C, Ly L, De La Rue K, Hinder MR, Johnson L, Rodger J, Cooper S, Cullen CL, Barnett M, Young KM, Taylor BV. Low-intensity repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation is safe and well tolerated by people living with MS - outcomes of the phase I randomised controlled trial (TAURUS). Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin 2024; 10:20552173241252571. [PMID: 38756414 PMCID: PMC11097717 DOI: 10.1177/20552173241252571] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2023] [Accepted: 04/17/2024] [Indexed: 05/18/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Low-intensity repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), delivered as a daily intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) for four consecutive weeks, increased the number of new oligodendrocytes in the adult mouse brain. Therefore, rTMS holds potential as a remyelinating intervention for people with multiple sclerosis (MS). Objective Primarily to determine the safety and tolerability of our rTMS protocol in people with MS. Secondary objectives include feasibility, blinding and an exploration of changes in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) metrics, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and cognitive or motor performance. Methods A randomised (2:1), placebo controlled, single blind, parallel group, phase 1 trial of 20 rTMS sessions (600 iTBS pulses per hemisphere; 25% maximum stimulator output), delivered over 4-5 weeks. Twenty participants were randomly assigned to 'sham' (n = 7) or active rTMS (n = 13), with the coil positioned at 90° or 0°, respectively. Results Five adverse events (AEs) including one serious AE reported. None were related to treatment. Protocol compliance was high (85%) and blinding successful. Within participant MRI metrics, PROMs and cognitive or motor performance were unchanged over time. Conclusion Twenty sessions of rTMS is safe and well tolerated in a small group of people with MS. The study protocol and procedures are feasible. Improvement of sham is warranted before further investigating safety and efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Chigozie Ezegbe
- Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
| | - Kain Kyle
- Sydney Neuroimaging Analysis Centre (SNAC), Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Chenyu Wang
- Sydney Neuroimaging Analysis Centre (SNAC), Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Brain & Mind Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Linda Ly
- Sydney Neuroimaging Analysis Centre (SNAC), Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Katie De La Rue
- Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
| | - Mark R Hinder
- School of Psychological Sciences, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
| | - Lewis Johnson
- Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
| | - Jennifer Rodger
- School of Biological Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia
- Perron Institute for Neurological and Translational Science, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia
| | | | - Carlie L Cullen
- Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
- Mater Research Institute, University of Queensland, Woolloongabba, Queensland, Australia
| | - Michael Barnett
- Sydney Neuroimaging Analysis Centre (SNAC), Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Brain & Mind Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Kaylene M Young
- Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
| | - Bruce V Taylor
- Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Alashram AR, Janada Q, Ghrear T. Noninvasive brain stimulation for spasticity rehabilitation in multiple sclerosis: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. PM R 2024; 16:268-277. [PMID: 37574913 DOI: 10.1002/pmrj.13055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2023] [Revised: 06/29/2023] [Accepted: 08/01/2023] [Indexed: 08/15/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate the effects of noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) on spasticity in people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS). LITERATURE SURVEY We searched PubMed, SCOPUS, MEDLINE, REHABDATA, PEDro, CINAHL, AMED, and Web of Science until December 2022. METHODOLOGY Studies were selected if they included PwMS, used transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) or repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) as a main intervention, and were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) including at least one outcome measure evaluating spasticity. Two researchers individually screened the selected studies. The study's quality was assessed using the Cochrane Collaborations tool. The researchers decided that the meta-analysis was not possible because the treatment interventions varied among the selected studies. SYNTHESIS In total, 147 studies were reviewed. Of them, nine studies met the eligibility criteria and included 193 PwMS (mean age = 43.2 years), 54.4% of whom were female. Eight studies were considered "high" quality and one was considered "moderate" quality. Seven studies that used rTMS demonstrated a significant decrease in spasticity in PwMS after the intervention. The remaining studies that provided tDCS did not show meaningful effects. CONCLUSIONS The evidence for the influences of rTMS on spasticity in PwMS is promising. The evidence for the impact of tDCS on spasticity in PwMS was limited. Further RCTs with long-term follow-ups are encouraged.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anas R Alashram
- Department of Physiotherapy, Middle East University, Amman, Jordan
- Applied Science Research Center, Applied Science Private University, Amman, Jordan
| | - Qusai Janada
- Department of Physiotherapy, Middle East University, Amman, Jordan
| | - Tamara Ghrear
- Department of Physiotherapy, Middle East University, Amman, Jordan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Jemna N, Zdrenghea AC, Frunza G, Demea AD, Hapca GE, Grad DA, Muresanu IA, Chereches RM, Muresanu FD. Theta-burst stimulation as a therapeutic tool in neurological pathology: a systematic review. Neurol Sci 2024; 45:911-940. [PMID: 37882997 DOI: 10.1007/s10072-023-07144-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2023] [Accepted: 10/16/2023] [Indexed: 10/27/2023]
Abstract
TBS (theta-burst stimulation) is a novel therapeutic approach in a wide range of neurological diseases. The present systematic review aims to identify the various protocols used in the last years, to assess study quality and to offer a general overview of the current state of the literature. The systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Item for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We applied the following inclusion criteria: (1) population over 18 years old with diagnosed neurological disorders, (2) patients treated with sessions of theta-burst stimulation, (3) randomized-controlled clinical trials, (4) articles in the English language, and (5) studies that report response and score reduction on a validated scale of the investigated disorder or remission rates. We included in the final analysis 56 randomized controlled trials focusing on different neurological pathologies (stroke, Parkinson`s disease, multiple sclerosis, tinnitus, dystonia, chronic pain, essential tremor and tic disorder), and we extracted data regarding study design, groups and comparators, sample sizes, type of coil, stimulation parameters (frequency, number of pulses, intensity, stimulation site etc.), number of sessions, follow-up, assessment through functional connectivity and neurological scales used. We observed a great interstudy heterogenicity that leads to a difficulty in drawing plain conclusions. TBS protocols have shown promising results in improving various symptoms in patients with neurological disorders, but larger and more coherent studies, using similar stimulation protocols and evaluation scales, are needed to establish guideline recommendations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicoleta Jemna
- RoNeuro Institute for Neurological Research and Diagnostic, Cluj Napoca, Romania
| | - Ana Calina Zdrenghea
- RoNeuro Institute for Neurological Research and Diagnostic, Cluj Napoca, Romania.
- Department of Neurosciences, Clinical County Emergency Hospital, Cluj Napoca, Romania.
| | - Georgiana Frunza
- RoNeuro Institute for Neurological Research and Diagnostic, Cluj Napoca, Romania
- Department of Neurosciences, Clinical County Emergency Hospital, Cluj Napoca, Romania
| | - Anca Diana Demea
- RoNeuro Institute for Neurological Research and Diagnostic, Cluj Napoca, Romania
- Department of Neurosciences, Clinical County Emergency Hospital, Cluj Napoca, Romania
| | - Gheorghe Elian Hapca
- RoNeuro Institute for Neurological Research and Diagnostic, Cluj Napoca, Romania
- Department of Neurosciences, Clinical County Emergency Hospital, Cluj Napoca, Romania
| | | | | | - Razvan Mircea Chereches
- RoNeuro Institute for Neurological Research and Diagnostic, Cluj Napoca, Romania
- Department of Public Health, Babes-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Fior Dafin Muresanu
- RoNeuro Institute for Neurological Research and Diagnostic, Cluj Napoca, Romania
- Department of Neurosciences, Clinical County Emergency Hospital, Cluj Napoca, Romania
- University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Iuliu Hatieganu", Cluj Napoca, Romania
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Mattioli F, Maglianella V, D'Antonio S, Trimarco E, Caligiore D. Non-invasive brain stimulation for patients and healthy subjects: Current challenges and future perspectives. J Neurol Sci 2024; 456:122825. [PMID: 38103417 DOI: 10.1016/j.jns.2023.122825] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2023] [Revised: 11/22/2023] [Accepted: 11/28/2023] [Indexed: 12/19/2023]
Abstract
Non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) techniques have a rich historical background, yet their utilization has witnessed significant growth only recently. These techniques encompass transcranial electrical stimulation and transcranial magnetic stimulation, which were initially employed in neuroscience to explore the intricate relationship between the brain and behaviour. However, they are increasingly finding application in research contexts as a means to address various neurological, psychiatric, and neurodegenerative disorders. This article aims to fulfill two primary objectives. Firstly, it seeks to showcase the current state of the art in the clinical application of NIBS, highlighting how it can improve and complement existing treatments. Secondly, it provides a comprehensive overview of the utilization of NIBS in augmenting the brain function of healthy individuals, thereby enhancing their performance. Furthermore, the article delves into the points of convergence and divergence between these two techniques. It also addresses the existing challenges and future prospects associated with NIBS from ethical and research standpoints.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Mattioli
- AI2Life s.r.l., Innovative Start-Up, ISTC-CNR Spin-Off, Via Sebino 32, 00199 Rome, Italy; School of Computing, Electronics and Mathematics, University of Plymouth, Drake Circus, Plymouth PL4 8AA, United Kingdom
| | - Valerio Maglianella
- Computational and Translational Neuroscience Laboratory, Institute of Cognitive Sciences and Technologies, National Research Council (CTNLab-ISTC-CNR), Via San Martino della Battaglia 44, 00185 Rome, Italy
| | - Sara D'Antonio
- Computational and Translational Neuroscience Laboratory, Institute of Cognitive Sciences and Technologies, National Research Council (CTNLab-ISTC-CNR), Via San Martino della Battaglia 44, 00185 Rome, Italy
| | - Emiliano Trimarco
- Computational and Translational Neuroscience Laboratory, Institute of Cognitive Sciences and Technologies, National Research Council (CTNLab-ISTC-CNR), Via San Martino della Battaglia 44, 00185 Rome, Italy
| | - Daniele Caligiore
- AI2Life s.r.l., Innovative Start-Up, ISTC-CNR Spin-Off, Via Sebino 32, 00199 Rome, Italy; Computational and Translational Neuroscience Laboratory, Institute of Cognitive Sciences and Technologies, National Research Council (CTNLab-ISTC-CNR), Via San Martino della Battaglia 44, 00185 Rome, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Uygur-Kucukseymen E, Pacheco-Barrios K, Yuksel B, Gonzalez-Mego P, Soysal A, Fregni F. Non-invasive brain stimulation on clinical symptoms in multiple sclerosis patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Mult Scler Relat Disord 2023; 78:104927. [PMID: 37595371 DOI: 10.1016/j.msard.2023.104927] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2023] [Revised: 07/21/2023] [Accepted: 07/30/2023] [Indexed: 08/20/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) has demonstrated mixed effects on the clinical symptoms of multiple sclerosis. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effects of NIBS techniques on the most common symptoms of MS. METHODS A literature search was performed until October 2022 which included randomized controlled trials and quasi-experimental studies that used sham-controlled NIBS in patients with MS. We calculated the Hedge's effect sizes of each domain of interest and their 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) and performed random effects meta-analyses. RESULTS A total of 49 studies were included in the systematic review (944 participants). Forty-four eligible studies were included for quantitative analysis, of which 33 applied transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), 9 transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), and 2 transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS). We found a significant decrease in fatigue (ES: - 0.86, 95% CI: - 1.22 to - 0.51, p < 0.0001), pain (ES: - 1.91, 95% CI, - 3.64 to - 0.19, p= 0.03) and psychiatric symptoms (ES: - 1.44, 95% CI - 2.56 to - 0.32, p = 0.01) in favor of tDCS compared with the sham. On the other hand, there was no strong evidence showing tDCS effectiveness on motor performance and cognition (ES: - 0.03, 95% CI - 0.35 to 0.28, p = 0.83 and ES: 0.71, 95% CI, - 0.09 to 1.52, p = 0.08, respectively). Regarding TMS, we found a significant decrease in fatigue (ES: - 0.45, 95% CI: - 0.84 to -0.07, p = 0.02) and spasticity levels (ES: - 1.11, 95% CI: - 1.48 to - 0.75, p < 0.00001) compared to the sham. However, there was no strong evidence of the effectiveness of TMS on motor performance (ES: - 0.39, 95% CI - 0.95 to 0.16, p = 0.16). Finally, there was no significant evidence showing the effectiveness of tRNS on fatigue levels (ES: - 0.28, 95% CI: - 1.02 to 0.47, p = 0.46) and cognitive improvement (ES: - 0.04, 95% CI: - 0.6, 0.52, p = 0.88) compared with the sham. CONCLUSIONS Overall, most studies have investigated the effects of tDCS on MS symptoms, particularly fatigue. The symptom that most benefited from NIBS was fatigue, while the least to benefit was motor performance. In addition, we found that disability score was associated with fatigue improvement. Thus, these findings support the idea that NIBS could have some promising effects on specific MS symptoms. It is also important to underscore that studies are very heterogeneous regarding the parameters of stimulation, and this may also have influenced the effects on some specific behavioral domains.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Kevin Pacheco-Barrios
- Neuromodulation Center and Center for Clinical Research Learning, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital and Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Unidad de Investigacion para la Generacion y Sintesis de Evidencia en Salud, Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola, Vicerrectorado de Investigacion, Lima, Peru
| | - Burcu Yuksel
- Istanbul Bakirkoy Prof. Dr. Mazhar Osman Mental Health and Neurological Diseases Training and Research Hospital, Clinic of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Paola Gonzalez-Mego
- Neuromodulation Center and Center for Clinical Research Learning, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital and Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Aysun Soysal
- Istanbul Bakirkoy Prof. Dr. Mazhar Osman Mental Health and Neurological Diseases Training and Research Hospital, Clinic of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Felipe Fregni
- Neuromodulation Center and Center for Clinical Research Learning, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital and Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Su D, Wang A, Zhu M, Yang F, Li W, Ma B, Liu M, Li Z, Wang B, Tu H, Ning B. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for treatment of limb spasticity following multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Braz J Med Biol Res 2023; 56:e12708. [PMID: 37255097 DOI: 10.1590/1414-431x2023e12708] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2023] [Accepted: 04/15/2023] [Indexed: 06/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Pilot trials have suggested that repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) may reduce limb spasticity in multiple sclerosis (MS). We carried out the current meta-analysis to synthesize currently available evidence regarding such correlation. Up to November 2022, five international electronic databases (Cochrane CENTRAL, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and CINAHL) and four Chinese electronic databases (CBM, CNKI, WanFang Data, and VIP) were systematically searched to identify randomized trials comparing active rTMS and sham stimulation in patients with MS-related spasticity. Two reviewers independently selected studies and extracted data on study design, quality, clinical outcomes, and time points measured. The primary outcome was clinical spasticity relief after intervention. Secondary outcomes included spasticity at the follow-up visit 2 weeks later and post-treatment fatigue. Of 831 titles found, we included 8 studies (181 participants) in the quantitative analysis. Pooled analyses showed that rTMS therapy was associated with significant spasticity relief in the early post-intervention period [standardized mean differences (SMD): -0.67; 95%CI: -1.12 to -0.21], but there was insufficient evidence for rTMS in reducing spasticity at the follow-up visit 2 weeks later (SMD: -0.17; 95%CI: -0.52 to 0.17) and fatigue (SMD: -0.26; 95%CI: -0.84 to 0.31). This evidence supports the recommendations to treat MS-related spasticity with rTMS, but underlines the need for further large randomized trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dongyun Su
- Department of Neurology, The First People's Hospital of Longquanyi District Chengdu, Longquanyi District, Chengdu, China
| | - Anzi Wang
- Department of Hematology, The Third People's Hospital of Chengdu, Qingyang District, Chengdu, China
| | - Meirong Zhu
- Department of Neurology, The First People's Hospital of Longquanyi District Chengdu, Longquanyi District, Chengdu, China
| | - Fei Yang
- Department of Neurology, The First People's Hospital of Longquanyi District Chengdu, Longquanyi District, Chengdu, China
| | - Wei Li
- Department of Neurology, The First People's Hospital of Longquanyi District Chengdu, Longquanyi District, Chengdu, China
| | - Bo Ma
- Department of Neurology, The First People's Hospital of Longquanyi District Chengdu, Longquanyi District, Chengdu, China
| | - Min Liu
- Department of Neurology, The First People's Hospital of Longquanyi District Chengdu, Longquanyi District, Chengdu, China
| | - Zongqi Li
- Department of Neurology, The First People's Hospital of Longquanyi District Chengdu, Longquanyi District, Chengdu, China
| | - Bo Wang
- Department of Neurology, The First People's Hospital of Longquanyi District Chengdu, Longquanyi District, Chengdu, China
| | - Huanyi Tu
- Department of Neurology, The First People's Hospital of Longquanyi District Chengdu, Longquanyi District, Chengdu, China
| | - Bo Ning
- Department of Neurology, The First People's Hospital of Longquanyi District Chengdu, Longquanyi District, Chengdu, China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Duan H, Jing Y, Li Y, Lian Y, Li J, Li Z. Rehabilitation treatment of multiple sclerosis. Front Immunol 2023; 14:1168821. [PMID: 37090712 PMCID: PMC10117641 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1168821] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2023] [Accepted: 03/27/2023] [Indexed: 04/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Multiple sclerosis is a slowly progressive disease, immunosuppressants and other drugs can delay the progression and progression of the disease, but the most patients will be left with varying degrees of neurological deficit symptoms, such as muscle weakness, muscle spasm, ataxia, sensory impairment, dysphagia, cognitive dysfunction, psychological disorders, etc. From the early stage of the disease to the stage of disease progression, professional rehabilitation treatment can reduce the functional dysfunction of multiple sclerosis patients, improve neurological function, and reduce family and social burdens. With the development of various new rehabilitation technologies such as transcranial magnetic stimulation, virtual reality technology, robot-assisted gait, telerehabilitation and transcranial direct current stimulation, the advantages of rehabilitation therapy in multiple sclerosis treatment have been further established, and more treatment means have also been provided for patients.
Collapse
|
9
|
Ahmadpanah M, Amini S, Mazdeh M, Haghighi M, Soltanian A, Jahangard L, Keshavarzi A, Brand S. Effectiveness of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) Add-On Therapy to a Standard Treatment in Individuals with Multiple Sclerosis and Concomitant Symptoms of Depression—Results from a Randomized Clinical Trial and Pilot Study. J Clin Med 2023; 12:jcm12072525. [PMID: 37048608 PMCID: PMC10095476 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12072525] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2022] [Revised: 03/16/2023] [Accepted: 03/17/2023] [Indexed: 03/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Compared to the general population, persons with multiple sclerosis (MS) are at increased risk of suffering from major depressive disorder (MDD). Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) was used successfully to treat individuals with MDD. Here, we conducted a randomized clinical trial and pilot study, and tested the effectiveness of rTMS adjuvant to a standard pharmacological treatment among persons with MS, compared to a sham condition. Materials and Methods: A total of 40 persons with MS (mean age: 32 years; 42.5% females; median EDSS score: 4) and with moderate to severe symptoms of depression were randomly assigned to the rTMS or to the rTMS sham condition, always as adjuvant intervention to the standard treatment with sertraline, a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI). rTMS consisted of 10 sessions each of 37.5 min; the sham condition was identical to the active condition except for the absence of rTMS stimuli. At the beginning and two weeks after the end of the study, participants reported on their fatigue, while experts rated the severity of participants’ depressive symptoms (Montgomery–Asberg Depression Rating Scale; MADRS), cognitive performance (Montreal Cognitive Assessment; MoCA), and degree of disability (Expanded Disability Status Scale; EDSS). Results: Data were analyzed per intent-to-treat. Scores for depression, fatigue, and EDSS declined significantly over time (large effect sizes), but more so in the rTMS condition than in the sham condition (large effect sizes for the time by group-interactions). Compared to the sham condition, scores for depression were significantly lower in the rTMS condition. Scores for cognition improved over time in both study conditions (large effect size). Conclusion: Compared to a sham condition, adjuvant rTMS to a standard pharmacological treatment ameliorated typical MS-related symptoms (depression; fatigue; EDSS scores). Results from this pilot study suggested that rTMS might be routinely applied in persons with MS displaying symptoms of depression and fatigue.
Collapse
|
10
|
Stefanov K, Al-Wasity S, Parkinson JT, Waiter GD, Cavanagh J, Basu N. Brain mapping inflammatory-arthritis-related fatigue in the pursuit of novel therapeutics. THE LANCET. RHEUMATOLOGY 2023; 5:e99-e109. [PMID: 38251542 DOI: 10.1016/s2665-9913(23)00007-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2022] [Revised: 11/28/2022] [Accepted: 11/29/2022] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
Despite developments in pharmacological treatments, chronic fatigue is an unresolved issue for most people with inflammatory arthritis that severely disrupts their personal and working lives. Fatigue in these patients is not strongly linked with peripheral disease activity but is associated with CNS-derived symptoms such as chronic pain, sleep disturbance, and depression. Therefore, a neurobiological basis should be considered when pursuing novel fatigue-specific therapeutics. In this Review, we focus on clinical imaging biomarkers that map candidate brain regions and are crucial in fatigue pathophysiology. We then evaluate neuromodulation techniques that could affect these candidate brain regions and are potential treatment strategies for fatigue in patients with inflammatory arthritis. We delineate work that is still required for neuroimaging and neuromodulation to eventually become part of a clinical pathway to treat and manage fatigue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristian Stefanov
- School of Infection and Immunity, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
| | - Salim Al-Wasity
- School of Infection and Immunity, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK; College of Engineering, University of Wasit, Al Kūt, Iraq
| | - Joel T Parkinson
- School of Infection and Immunity, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Gordon D Waiter
- Institute of Medical Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Jonathan Cavanagh
- School of Infection and Immunity, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Neil Basu
- School of Infection and Immunity, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Zhang X, Huai Y, Wei Z, Yang W, Xie Q, Yi L. Non-invasive brain stimulation therapy on neurological symptoms in patients with multiple sclerosis: A network meta analysis. Front Neurol 2022; 13:1007702. [PMID: 36457862 PMCID: PMC9705977 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2022.1007702] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2022] [Accepted: 10/31/2022] [Indexed: 02/22/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of the study was to evaluate non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) [including transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and transcranial electrical stimulation (tES)] on neurological symptoms in patients with multiple sclerosis (PwMS). METHOD We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and Ovid MEDLINE until February 2022. And we evaluated the included studies for methodological quality by the Cochrane bias risk assessment tool and assessed the studies' certainty of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) framework. We performed network meta analysis (NMA) by using Stata 15 and ranked the results of the NMA by using the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) ranking chart. RESULT Twenty seven clinical trials were finally included (N = 596, 66.4% women). For the immediate effects, rTMS over M1 yielded the most optimal scheme for fatigue reduction among all the interventions compared to the sham stimulation groups [MD = -0.85, 95% CI (-1.57, -0.14)] (SUCRA = 82.6%). iTBS over M1 yielded the most signifcant reduced pain level than the sham groups did [MD = -1.26, 95% CI (-2.40, -0.11)] (SUCRA = 98.4%). tDCS over F3 was the best protocol of NIBS to improve quality of life (QOL) [MD = 1.41, 95% CI = (0.45,2.36)] (SUCRA = 76.7%), and iTBS over M1 may significantly reduce spasticity compared to sham stimulation [MD = -1.20, 95% CI = (-1.99, -0.41)] (SUCRA = 90.3%). Furthermore, rTMS, tRNS, and tDCS on certain areas may improve PwMS accuracy, response time, manual dexterity, pain relief and QOL, but does not show statistically significant differences. The evidence assessed using GRADE is very low. CONCLUSION Based on the NMA and SUCRA ranking, we can conclude that symptoms including fatigue, pain, spasticity, and QOL can be improved by following NIBS protocol after treatment. Nonetheless, most of the included studies lack a good methodology, and more high-quality randomized clinical trials are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaoyun Zhang
- Rehabilitation Department, Shenzhen Longhua District Central Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
- Shenzhen Longhua District Rehabilitation Medical Equipment Development and Transformation Joint Key Laboratory, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
| | - Yaping Huai
- Rehabilitation Department, Shenzhen Longhua District Central Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
- Shenzhen Longhua District Rehabilitation Medical Equipment Development and Transformation Joint Key Laboratory, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
| | - Zhiqiang Wei
- Neurology Department, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
| | - Weiwei Yang
- Rehabilitation Department, Shenzhen Longhua District Central Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
| | - Qizhi Xie
- Neurology Department, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
| | - Li Yi
- Neurology Department, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Fan J, Fu H, Xie X, Zhong D, Li Y, Liu X, Zhang H, Zhang J, Huang J, Li J, Jin R, Zheng Z. The effectiveness and safety of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on spasticity after upper motor neuron injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Neural Circuits 2022; 16:973561. [PMID: 36426136 PMCID: PMC9679509 DOI: 10.3389/fncir.2022.973561] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2022] [Accepted: 10/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
To systematically evaluate the effectiveness and safety of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on spasticity after upper motor neuron (UMN) injury. Eight electronic databases were searched from inception to August 6, 2022. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the effectiveness and safety of rTMS on spasticity after UMN injury were retrieved. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias. Review Manager 5.3 and Stata 14.0 software were used to synthesize data. The certainty of the evidence was appraised with the Grade of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation tool. Forty-two studies with a total of 2,108 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis revealed that, compared with control group, rTMS could significantly decrease scores of the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) in patients with UMN injury. The subgroup analysis discovered that rTMS effectively decreased the MAS scores in patients with stroke. Meanwhile, rTMS treatment > 10 sessions has better effect and rTMS could decrease the MAS scores of upper limb. Thirty-three patients complained of twitching facial muscles, headache and dizziness, etc. In summary, rTMS could be recommended as an effective and safe therapy to relieve spasticity in patients with UMN injury. However, due to high heterogeneity and limited RCTs, this conclusion should be treated with caution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jin Fan
- School of Health Preservation and Rehabilitation, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China,Mental Health Center, West China Hospital, West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Hui Fu
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Xiaolong Xie
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, The Affiliated Meishan Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Meishan, China
| | - Dongling Zhong
- School of Health Preservation and Rehabilitation, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China
| | - Yuxi Li
- School of Health Preservation and Rehabilitation, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China
| | - Xiaobo Liu
- School of Health Preservation and Rehabilitation, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China
| | - Huiling Zhang
- School of Health Preservation and Rehabilitation, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China
| | - Jun Zhang
- School of Health Preservation and Rehabilitation, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China
| | - Jiaxi Huang
- Mental Health Center, West China Hospital, West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Juan Li
- School of Health Preservation and Rehabilitation, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China,Juan Li,
| | - Rongjiang Jin
- School of Health Preservation and Rehabilitation, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China,*Correspondence: Rongjiang Jin,
| | - Zhong Zheng
- Mental Health Center, West China Hospital, West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China,Zhong Zheng,
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Zhou X, Li K, Chen S, Zhou W, Li J, Huang Q, Xu T, Gao Z, Wang D, Zhao S, Dong H. Clinical application of transcranial magnetic stimulation in multiple sclerosis. Front Immunol 2022; 13:902658. [PMID: 36131925 PMCID: PMC9483183 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.902658] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2022] [Accepted: 08/05/2022] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a common chronic, autoimmune-mediated inflammatory and neurodegenerative disease of the central nervous system. The treatment of MS has enormous progress with disease-modifying drugs, but the complexity of the disease course and the clinical symptoms of MS requires personalized treatment and disease management, including non-pharmacological treatment. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a painless and non-invasive brain stimulation technique, which has been widely used in neurological diseases. In this review, we mainly focus on the progress of physiological assessment and treatment of TMS in MS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaoliang Zhou
- Department of Neurology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Kailin Li
- Department of Neurology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
- Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Si Chen
- Department of Neurology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Wenbin Zhou
- Department of Neurology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Jing Li
- Department of Neurology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Qing Huang
- Department of Neurology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Tingting Xu
- Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Zhiyuan Gao
- Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Dongyu Wang
- Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Shuo Zhao
- Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Hao Dong
- Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha, China
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Krese KA, Donnelly KZ, Etingen B, Bender Pape TL, Chaudhuri S, Aaronson AL, Shah RP, Bhaumik DK, Billups A, Bedo S, Wanicek-Squeo MT, Bobra S, Herrold AA. Feasibility of a Combined Neuromodulation and Yoga Intervention for Mild Traumatic Brain Injury and Chronic Pain: Protocol for an Open-label Pilot Trial. JMIR Res Protoc 2022; 11:e37836. [PMID: 35704372 PMCID: PMC9244651 DOI: 10.2196/37836] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2022] [Accepted: 03/16/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) and chronic pain often co-occur and worsen rehabilitation outcomes. There is a need for improved multimodal nonpharmacologic treatments that could improve outcomes for both conditions. Yoga is a promising activity-based intervention for mTBI and chronic pain, and neuromodulation through transcranial magnetic stimulation is a promising noninvasive, nonpharmacological treatment for mTBI and chronic pain. Intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) is a type of patterned, excitatory transcranial magnetic stimulation. iTBS can induce a window of neuroplasticity, making it ideally suited to boost the effects of treatments provided after it. Thus, iTBS may magnify the impacts of subsequently delivered interventions as compared to delivering those interventions alone and accordingly boost their impact on outcomes. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study is to (1) develop a combined iTBS+yoga intervention for mTBI and chronic pain, (2) assess the intervention's feasibility and acceptability, and (3) gather preliminary clinical outcome data on quality of life, function, and pain that will guide future studies. METHODS This is a mixed methods, pilot, open-labeled, within-subject intervention study. We will enroll 20 US military veteran participants. The combined iTBS+yoga intervention will be provided in small group settings once a week for 6 weeks. The yoga intervention will follow the LoveYourBrain yoga protocol-specifically developed for individuals with TBI. iTBS will be administered immediately prior to the LoveYourBrain yoga session. We will collect preliminary quantitative outcome data before and after the intervention related to quality of life (TBI-quality of life), function (Mayo-Portland Adaptability Index), and pain (Brief Pain Inventory) to inform larger studies. We will collect qualitative data via semistructured interviews focused on intervention acceptability after completion of the intervention. RESULTS This study protocol was approved by Edward Hines Jr Veterans Administration Hospital Institutional Review Board (Hines IRB 1573116-4) and was prospectively registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04517604). This study includes a Food and Drug Administration Investigational Device Exemption (IDE: G200195). A 2-year research plan timeline was developed. As of March 2022, a total of 6 veterans have enrolled in the study. Data collection is ongoing and will be completed by November 2022. We expect the results of this study to be available by October 2024. CONCLUSIONS We will be able to provide preliminary evidence of safety, feasibility, and acceptability of a novel combined iTBS and yoga intervention for mTBI and chronic pain-conditions with unmet treatment needs. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04517604; https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04517604. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID) DERR1-10.2196/37836.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelly A Krese
- Brain Innovation Center, Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, Chicago, IL, United States
- Research and Development Service, Edward Hines Jr Veterans Administration Hospital, Hines, IL, United States
| | | | - Bella Etingen
- Center for Innovation in Complex Chronic Healthcare & Research Service, Edward Hines Jr Veterans Administration Hospital, Hines, IL, United States
| | - Theresa L Bender Pape
- Research and Development Service, Edward Hines Jr Veterans Administration Hospital, Hines, IL, United States
- Center for Innovation in Complex Chronic Healthcare & Research Service, Edward Hines Jr Veterans Administration Hospital, Hines, IL, United States
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Sarmistha Chaudhuri
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Edward Hines Jr Veterans Administration Hospital, Hines, IL, United States
| | - Alexandra L Aaronson
- Mental Health Service Line, Edward Hines Jr Veterans Administration Hospital, Hines, IL, United States
- Department of Psychiatry, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Hines, IL, United States
| | - Rachana P Shah
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Edward Hines Jr Veterans Administration Hospital, Hines, IL, United States
| | - Dulal K Bhaumik
- Research and Development Service, Edward Hines Jr Veterans Administration Hospital, Hines, IL, United States
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Andrea Billups
- Research and Development Service, Edward Hines Jr Veterans Administration Hospital, Hines, IL, United States
| | - Sabrina Bedo
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Edward Hines Jr Veterans Administration Hospital, Hines, IL, United States
- Recreation Therapy, Edward Hines Jr Veterans Administration Hospital, Hines, IL, United States
| | - Mary Terese Wanicek-Squeo
- Recreation Therapy, Edward Hines Jr Veterans Administration Hospital, Hines, IL, United States
- Edward Hines Jr Veterans Administration Hospital, Hines, IL, United States
| | - Sonia Bobra
- Department of Radiology, Edward Hines Jr Veterans Administration Hospital, Hines, IL, United States
- Department of Radiology, Stritch School of Medicine, Loyola University Chicago, Maywood, IL, United States
| | - Amy A Herrold
- Research and Development Service, Edward Hines Jr Veterans Administration Hospital, Hines, IL, United States
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Tomeh A, Yusof Khan AHK, Inche Mat LN, Basri H, Wan Sulaiman WA. Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of the Primary Motor Cortex beyond Motor Rehabilitation: A Review of the Current Evidence. Brain Sci 2022; 12:brainsci12060761. [PMID: 35741646 PMCID: PMC9221422 DOI: 10.3390/brainsci12060761] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2022] [Revised: 06/01/2022] [Accepted: 06/02/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has emerged as a novel technique to stimulate the human brain through the scalp. Over the years, identifying the optimal brain region and stimulation parameters has been a subject of debate in the literature on therapeutic uses of repetitive TMS (rTMS). Nevertheless, the primary motor cortex (M1) has been a conventional target for rTMS to treat motor symptoms, such as hemiplegia and spasticity, as it controls the voluntary movement of the body. However, with an expanding knowledge base of the M1 cortical and subcortical connections, M1-rTMS has shown a therapeutic efficacy that goes beyond the conventional motor rehabilitation to involve pain, headache, fatigue, dysphagia, speech and voice impairments, sleep disorders, cognitive dysfunction, disorders of consciousness, anxiety, depression, and bladder dysfunction. In this review, we summarize the latest evidence on using M1-rTMS to treat non-motor symptoms of diverse etiologies and discuss the potential mechanistic rationale behind the management of each of these symptoms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abdulhameed Tomeh
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Malaysia; (A.T.); (A.H.K.Y.K.); (L.N.I.M.); (H.B.)
| | - Abdul Hanif Khan Yusof Khan
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Malaysia; (A.T.); (A.H.K.Y.K.); (L.N.I.M.); (H.B.)
- Malaysian Research Institute on Ageing (MyAgeingTM), Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Malaysia
| | - Liyana Najwa Inche Mat
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Malaysia; (A.T.); (A.H.K.Y.K.); (L.N.I.M.); (H.B.)
| | - Hamidon Basri
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Malaysia; (A.T.); (A.H.K.Y.K.); (L.N.I.M.); (H.B.)
| | - Wan Aliaa Wan Sulaiman
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Malaysia; (A.T.); (A.H.K.Y.K.); (L.N.I.M.); (H.B.)
- Malaysian Research Institute on Ageing (MyAgeingTM), Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Malaysia
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +60-3-9769-5560
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Mittal N, Thakkar B, Hodges CB, Lewis C, Cho Y, Hadimani RL, Peterson CL. Effect of neuroanatomy on corticomotor excitability during and after transcranial magnetic stimulation and intermittent theta burst stimulation. Hum Brain Mapp 2022; 43:4492-4507. [PMID: 35678552 PMCID: PMC9435000 DOI: 10.1002/hbm.25968] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2021] [Revised: 05/10/2022] [Accepted: 05/22/2022] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Individual neuroanatomy can influence motor responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and corticomotor excitability after intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS). The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between individual neuroanatomy and both TMS response measured using resting motor threshold (RMT) and iTBS measured using motor evoked potentials (MEPs) targeting the biceps brachii and first dorsal interosseus (FDI). Ten nonimpaired individuals completed sham‐controlled iTBS sessions and underwent MRI, from which anatomically accurate head models were generated. Neuroanatomical parameters established through fiber tractography were fiber tract surface area (FTSA), tract fiber count (TFC), and brain scalp distance (BSD) at the point of stimulation. Cortical magnetic field induced electric field strength (EFS) was obtained using finite element simulations. A linear mixed effects model was used to assess effects of these parameters on RMT and iTBS (post‐iTBS MEPs). FDI RMT was dependent on interactions between EFS and both FTSA and TFC. Biceps RMT was dependent on interactions between EFS and and both FTSA and BSD. There was no groupwide effect of iTBS on the FDI but individual changes in corticomotor excitability scaled with RMT, EFS, BSD, and FTSA. iTBS targeting the biceps was facilitatory, and dependent on FTSA and TFC. MRI‐based measures of neuroanatomy highlight how individual anatomy affects motor system responses to different TMS paradigms and may be useful for selecting appropriate motor targets when designing TMS based therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neil Mittal
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA.,College of Engineering, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA
| | - Bhushan Thakkar
- Department of Physical Therapy, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA
| | - Cooper B Hodges
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA
| | - Connor Lewis
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA.,College of Engineering, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA
| | - Yeajin Cho
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA.,College of Engineering, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA
| | - Ravi L Hadimani
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA.,College of Engineering, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA.,Department of Mechanical and Nuclear Engineering, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA
| | - Carrie L Peterson
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA.,College of Engineering, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Somaa FA, de Graaf TA, Sack AT. Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in the Treatment of Neurological Diseases. Front Neurol 2022; 13:793253. [PMID: 35669870 PMCID: PMC9163300 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2022.793253] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2021] [Accepted: 02/25/2022] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) has widespread use in research and clinical application. For psychiatric applications, such as depression or OCD, repetitive TMS protocols (rTMS) are an established and globally applied treatment option. While promising, rTMS is not yet as common in treating neurological diseases, except for neurorehabilitation after (motor) stroke and neuropathic pain treatment. This may soon change. New clinical studies testing the potential of rTMS in various other neurological conditions appear at a rapid pace. This can prove challenging for both practitioners and clinical researchers. Although most of these neurological applications have not yet received the same level of scientific/empirical scrutiny as motor stroke and neuropathic pain, the results are encouraging, opening new doors for TMS in neurology. We here review the latest clinical evidence for rTMS in pioneering neurological applications including movement disorders, Alzheimer's disease/mild cognitive impairment, epilepsy, multiple sclerosis, and disorders of consciousness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fahad A. Somaa
- Department of Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Medical Rehabilitation, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Tom A. de Graaf
- Section Brain Stimulation and Cognition, Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
- Center of Integrative Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Alexander T. Sack
- Section Brain Stimulation and Cognition, Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
- Center of Integrative Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
- Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Brain + Nerve Centre, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, Netherlands
- *Correspondence: Alexander T. Sack
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Yang QH, Zhang YH, Du SH, Wang YC, Fang Y, Wang XQ. Non-invasive Brain Stimulation for Central Neuropathic Pain. Front Mol Neurosci 2022; 15:879909. [PMID: 35663263 PMCID: PMC9162797 DOI: 10.3389/fnmol.2022.879909] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2022] [Accepted: 05/04/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
The research and clinical application of the noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) technique in the treatment of neuropathic pain (NP) are increasing. In this review article, we outline the effectiveness and limitations of the NIBS approach in treating common central neuropathic pain (CNP). This article summarizes the research progress of NIBS in the treatment of different CNPs and describes the effects and mechanisms of these methods on different CNPs. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) analgesic research has been relatively mature and applied to a variety of CNP treatments. But the optimal stimulation targets, stimulation intensity, and stimulation time of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) for each type of CNP are still difficult to identify. The analgesic mechanism of rTMS is similar to that of tDCS, both of which change cortical excitability and synaptic plasticity, regulate the release of related neurotransmitters and affect the structural and functional connections of brain regions associated with pain processing and regulation. Some deficiencies are found in current NIBS relevant studies, such as small sample size, difficulty to avoid placebo effect, and insufficient research on analgesia mechanism. Future research should gradually carry out large-scale, multicenter studies to test the stability and reliability of the analgesic effects of NIBS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qi-Hao Yang
- Department of Sport Rehabilitation, Shanghai University of Sport, Shanghai, China
| | - Yong-Hui Zhang
- Department of Sport Rehabilitation, Shanghai University of Sport, Shanghai, China
| | - Shu-Hao Du
- Department of Sport Rehabilitation, Shanghai University of Sport, Shanghai, China
| | - Yu-Chen Wang
- Department of Sport Rehabilitation, Shanghai University of Sport, Shanghai, China
| | - Yu Fang
- School of Mechanical and Automotive Engineering, Shanghai University of Engineering Science, Shanghai, China
- *Correspondence: Yu Fang,
| | - Xue-Qiang Wang
- Department of Sport Rehabilitation, Shanghai University of Sport, Shanghai, China
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Shanghai Shangti Orthopaedic Hospital, Shanghai, China
- Xue-Qiang Wang,
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Ayache SS, Serratrice N, Abi Lahoud GN, Chalah MA. Fatigue in Multiple Sclerosis: A Review of the Exploratory and Therapeutic Potential of Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation. Front Neurol 2022; 13:813965. [PMID: 35572947 PMCID: PMC9101483 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2022.813965] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2021] [Accepted: 03/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Fatigue is the most commonly reported symptom in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). It is a worrisome, frequent, and debilitating manifestation that could occur at any time during the course of MS and in all its subtypes. It could engender professional, familial, and socioeconomic consequences and could severely compromise the patients' quality of life. Clinically, the symptom exhibits motor, cognitive, and psychosocial facets. It is also important to differentiate between perceived or subjective self-reported fatigue and fatigability which is an objective measure of decrement in the performance of cognitive or motor tasks. The pathophysiology of MS fatigue is complex, and its management remains a challenge, despite the existing body of literature on this matter. Hence, unraveling its neural mechanisms and developing treatment options that target the latter might constitute a promising field to explore. A PubMed/Medline/Scopus search was conducted to perform this review which aims (a) to reappraise the available electrophysiological studies that explored fatigue in patients with MS with a particular focus on corticospinal excitability measures obtained using transcranial magnetic stimulation and (b) to assess the potential utility of employing neuromodulation (i.e., non-invasive brain stimulation techniques) in this context. A special focus will be put on the role of transcranial direct current stimulation and transcranial magnetic stimulation. We have provided some suggestions that will help overcome the current limitations in upcoming research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samar S. Ayache
- EA4391 Excitabilité Nerveuse and Thérapeutique, Université Paris Est Créteil, Créteil, France
- Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, DMU FIxIT, Henri Mondor University Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), Créteil, France
- *Correspondence: Samar S. Ayache
| | - Nicolas Serratrice
- Department of Spine Surgery, Centre Médico Chirurgical Bizet, Paris, France
- Institut de la Colonne Vertébrale et des Neurosciences (ICVNS), Centre Médico Chirurgical Bizet, Paris, France
| | - Georges N. Abi Lahoud
- Department of Spine Surgery, Centre Médico Chirurgical Bizet, Paris, France
- Institut de la Colonne Vertébrale et des Neurosciences (ICVNS), Centre Médico Chirurgical Bizet, Paris, France
| | - Moussa A. Chalah
- EA4391 Excitabilité Nerveuse and Thérapeutique, Université Paris Est Créteil, Créteil, France
- Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, DMU FIxIT, Henri Mondor University Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), Créteil, France
- Moussa A. Chalah
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Kan RL, Xu GX, Shu KT, Lai FH, Kranz G, Kranz GS. Effects of non-invasive brain stimulation in multiple sclerosis: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ther Adv Chronic Dis 2022; 13:20406223211069198. [PMID: 35126965 PMCID: PMC8814979 DOI: 10.1177/20406223211069198] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2021] [Accepted: 12/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: The objective of this meta-analysis was to summarize evidence on the therapeutic effects of non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) on core symptoms of multiple sclerosis (MS). Specifically, findings from studies deploying transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) protocols were summarized in this review. Methods: We systematically searched articles published in four databases, until 31 May 2021, which compared the effects of active tDCS or rTMS with sham intervention in MS patients. We used a random-effects model for this meta-analysis. Meta-regression and subgroup meta-analysis were used to examine the effects of stimulation dose and different stimulation protocols, respectively. Results: Twenty-five randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included in this review, consisting of 19 tDCS and 6 rTMS studies. tDCS led to a significant and immediate reduction of fatigue with a large effect size (Hedges’s g = −0.870, 95% confidence intervals (CI) = [−1.225 to −0.458], number needed to treat (NNT) = 2). Particularly, a subgroup analysis showed that applying tDCS over the left DLPFC and bilateral S1 led to fatigue reductions compared to sham stimulation. Furthermore, tDCS had favorable effects on fatigue in MS patients with low physical disability but not those with high physical disability, and additionally improved cognitive function. Finally, whereas rTMS was observed to reduce muscle spasticity, these NIBS protocols showed no further effect on MS-associated pain and mood symptoms. Conclusion: tDCS in MS alleviates fatigue and improves cognitive function whereas rTMS reduces muscle spasticity. More high-quality studies are needed to substantiate the therapeutic effects of different NIBS protocols in MS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca L.D. Kan
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Hong Kong, SAR, China
| | - Grace X.J. Xu
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Hong Kong, SAR, China
| | - Kate T. Shu
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Hong Kong, SAR, China
- Department of Rehabilitation, Third Military Medical University Southwest Hospital, Chongqing, China
| | - Frank H.Y. Lai
- Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, The Northumbria University Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Gottfried Kranz
- Neurological Rehabilitation Center Rosenhügel, Vienna, Austria
| | - Georg S. Kranz
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Hong Kong, SAR, 999077, China; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; The State Key Laboratory of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong, SAR, China
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Stampanoni Bassi M, Iezzi E, Centonze D. Multiple sclerosis: Inflammation, autoimmunity and plasticity. HANDBOOK OF CLINICAL NEUROLOGY 2022; 184:457-470. [PMID: 35034754 DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-819410-2.00024-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
In recent years, experimental studies have clarified that immune system influences the functioning of the central nervous system (CNS) in both physiologic and pathologic conditions. The neuro-immune crosstalk plays a crucial role in neuronal development and may be critically involved in mediating CNS response to neuronal damage. Multiple sclerosis (MS) represents a good model to investigate how the immune system regulates neuronal activity. Accordingly, a growing body of evidence has demonstrated that increased levels of pro-inflammatory mediators may significantly impact synaptic mechanisms, influencing overall neuronal excitability and synaptic plasticity expression. In this chapter, we provide an overview of preclinical data and clinical studies exploring synaptic functioning noninvasively with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in patients with MS. Moreover, we examine how inflammation-driven synaptic dysfunction could affect synaptic plasticity expression, negatively influencing the MS course. Contrasting CSF inflammation together with pharmacologic enhancement of synaptic plasticity and application of noninvasive brain stimulation, alone or in combination with rehabilitative treatments, could improve the clinical compensation and prevent the accumulating deterioration in MS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ennio Iezzi
- Unit of Neurology & Neurorehabilitation, IRCCS Neuromed, Pozzilli, Italy
| | - Diego Centonze
- Unit of Neurology & Neurorehabilitation, IRCCS Neuromed, Pozzilli, Italy; Laboratory of Synaptic Immunopathology, Department of Systems Medicine, Tor Vergata University, Rome, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Mult Scler Relat Disord 2022; 59:103564. [DOI: 10.1016/j.msard.2022.103564] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2021] [Revised: 01/20/2022] [Accepted: 01/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
|
23
|
Zang Y, Zhang Y, Lai X, Yang Y, Guo J, Gu S, Zhu Y. Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Neuropathic Pain on the Non-Motor Cortex: An Evidence Mapping of Systematic Reviews. EVIDENCE-BASED COMPLEMENTARY AND ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE : ECAM 2021; 2021:3671800. [PMID: 34745280 PMCID: PMC8570850 DOI: 10.1155/2021/3671800] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2021] [Revised: 10/04/2021] [Accepted: 10/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study was aimed to summarize and analyze the quality of the available evidence in systematic reviews (SRs) of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on the non-motor cortex (non-M1) for neuropathic pain (NP) through an evidence mapping approach. METHODS We follow the Global Evidence Mapping (GEM) methodology. Searches were conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, Epistemonikos, and the Cochrane Library. The study type was restricted to SRs with or without meta-analysis. All literature published before January 23, 2021, were included. The methodological quality of the included SRs was assessed using A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR-2). Data were extracted according to a defined population-intervention-comparison-outcome (PICO) framework from primary studies that included SRs. The same PICO was categorized into PICOs according to interventions (stimulation target, frequency, number of sessions (short: 1-5 sessions, medium: 5-10 sessions, and long: >10 sessions)) and comparison (sham rTMS or other targets). The evidence mapping was presented in tables and a bubble plot. RESULTS A total of 23 SRs were included. According to the AMSTAR-2, 20 SRs scored "very low" in terms of methodological quality, 2 SRs scored "low," and 1 SR scored "high." A total of 17 PICOs were extracted. The dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) is the most studied of the non-motor cortex targets. PICOs of DLPFC, premotor cortex (PMC), frontal cortex, and secondary somatosensory cortex (S2) were mainly categorized with a "potentially better" conclusion. High-frequency (5-20 Hz) rTMS of non-M1 usually lead to "potentially better" conclusions. CONCLUSIONS DLPFC, PMC, frontal cortex, and S2 seem to be promising new targets for rTMS treatment of certain NP. Evidence mapping is a useful and reliable methodology to identify and present the existing evidence gap that more research efforts are necessary in order to highlight the optimal stimulation protocols for non-M1 targets and standardize parameters to fill the evidence gaps of rTMS. Further investigation is advised to improve the methodological quality and the reporting process of SRs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yaning Zang
- Department of Kinesiology, Shanghai University of Sport, Shanghai, China
| | - Yongni Zhang
- School of Health Sciences, Duquesne University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Xigui Lai
- Department of Kinesiology, Shanghai University of Sport, Shanghai, China
| | - Yujie Yang
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China
| | - Jiabao Guo
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, The Second School of Clinical Medicine, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China
| | - Shanshan Gu
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Yi Zhu
- Department of Musculoskeletal Pain Rehabilitation, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Korzhova IE, Bakulin IS, Poydasheva AG, Klochkov AS, Zakroyshschikova IV, Suponeva NA, Askarova LS, Zakharova MN. [Rehabilitation of patients with multiple sclerosis]. Zh Nevrol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova 2021; 121:13-21. [PMID: 34387441 DOI: 10.17116/jnevro202112107213] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Multiple sclerosis is a common cause of disability among young and middle-aged people. Despite the modern possibilities of diagnostics and therapy, over time, the disease acquires a secondary progressive character. Rehabilitation of patients at all stages of the disease plays an important role in improving well-being, improving the quality of life, adapting the patient and restoring motor skills. However, there is currently no clear recommendation for the application of specific techniques in each case. The aim of this work was to analyze the available methods of rehabilitation therapy, to highlight the most used and promising ones. Due to the progressive course of the disease, the benefits of rehabilitation measures are usually higher at the initial stages. Nevertheless, nowadays there is a large number of works devoted to rehabilitation measures in patients with moderate and high levels of disability. It has been shown that both inpatient and outpatient rehabilitation has a positive effect on the quality of life and improvement of clinical indicators. Our review describes the main techniques with recommendations for the scheme of application. A comprehensive assessment of the patient's health status, a multidisciplinary team and a personalized approach increase the quality and effectiveness of rehabilitation measures. We also describe our own experience in the treatment of spasticity in patients with a secondary progressive multiple sclerosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - I S Bakulin
- Research Center of Neurology, Moscow, Russia
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Antczak J, Rusin G, Słowik A. Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation as a Diagnostic and Therapeutic Tool in Various Types of Dementia. J Clin Med 2021; 10:jcm10132875. [PMID: 34203558 PMCID: PMC8267667 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10132875] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2021] [Revised: 06/23/2021] [Accepted: 06/25/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Dementia is recognized as a healthcare and social burden and remains challenging in terms of proper diagnosis and treatment. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a diagnostic and therapeutic tool in various neurological diseases that noninvasively investigates cortical excitability and connectivity and can induce brain plasticity. This article reviews findings on TMS in common dementia types as well as therapeutic results. Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is characterized by increased cortical excitability and reduced cortical inhibition, especially as mediated by cholinergic neurons and as documented by impairment of short latency inhibition (SAI). In vascular dementia, excitability is also increased. SAI may have various outcomes, which probably reflects its frequent overlap with AD. Dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) is associated with SAI decrease. Motor cortical excitability is usually normal, reflecting the lack of corticospinal tract involvement. DLB and other dementia types are also characterized by impairment of short interval intracortical inhibition. In frontotemporal dementia, cortical excitability is increased, but SAI is normal. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation has the potential to improve cognitive function. It has been extensively studied in AD, showing promising results after multisite stimulation. TMS with electroencephalography recording opens new possibilities for improving diagnostic accuracy; however, more studies are needed to support the existing data.
Collapse
|
26
|
Chen YH, Chen CL, Huang YZ, Chen HC, Chen CY, Wu CY, Lin KC. Augmented efficacy of intermittent theta burst stimulation on the virtual reality-based cycling training for upper limb function in patients with stroke: a double-blinded, randomized controlled trial. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2021; 18:91. [PMID: 34059090 PMCID: PMC8166006 DOI: 10.1186/s12984-021-00885-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2020] [Accepted: 05/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Virtual reality and arm cycling have been reported as effective treatments for improving upper limb motor recovery in patients with stroke. Intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) can increase ipsilesional cortical excitability, and has been increasingly used in patients with stroke. However, few studies examined the augmented effect of iTBS on neurorehabilitation program. In this study, we investigated the augmented effect of iTBS on virtual reality-based cycling training (VCT) for upper limb function in patients with stroke. Methods In this randomized controlled trial, 23 patients with stroke were recruited. Each patient received either 15 sessions of iTBS or sham stimulation in addition to VCT on the same day. Outcome measures were assessed before and after the intervention. Primary outcome measures for the improvement of upper limb motor function and spasticity were Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) and Modified Ashworth Scale Upper-Extremity (MAS-UE). Secondary outcome measures for activity and participation were Action Research Arm Test (ARAT), Nine Hole Peg Test (NHPT), Box and Block Test (BBT) and Motor Activity Log (MAL), and Stroke Impact Scale (SIS). Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were performed to evaluate the effectiveness after the intervention and Mann–Whitney U tests were conducted to compare the therapeutic effects between two groups. Results At post-treatment, both groups showed significant improvement in FMA-UE and ARAT, while only the iTBS + VCT group demonstrated significant improvement in MAS-UE, BBT, NHPT, MAL and SIS. The Mann–Whitney U tests revealed that the iTBS + VCT group has presented greater improvement than the sham group significantly in MAS-UE, MAL-AOU and SIS. However, there were no significant differences in the changes of the FMA-UE, ARAT, BBT, NHPT and MAL-QOM between groups. Conclusions Intermittent TBS showed augmented efficacy on VCT for reducing spasticity, increasing actual use of the affected upper limb, and improving participation in daily life in stroke patients. This study provided an integrated innovative intervention, which may be a promising therapy to improve upper limb function recovery in stroke rehabilitation. However, this study has a small sample size, and thus a further larger-scale study is warranted to confirm the treatment efficacy. Trial registration This trial was registered under ClinicalTrials.gov ID No. NCT03350087, retrospectively registered, on November 22, 2017
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu-Hsin Chen
- Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Chia-Ling Chen
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, Taiwan. .,Graduate Institute of Early Intervention, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
| | - Ying-Zu Huang
- Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.,Neuroscience Research Center and Department of Neurology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, Taiwan.,Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, National Central University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Hsieh-Ching Chen
- Department of Industrial and Management, National Taipei University of Technology, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chung-Yao Chen
- Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.,Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Keelung, Taiwan
| | - Ching-Yi Wu
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, Taiwan.,Department of Occupational Therapy, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Keh-Chung Lin
- School of Occupational Therapy, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.,Division of Occupational Therapy, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Non-invasive brain stimulation to assess neurophysiologic underpinnings of lower limb motor impairment in multiple sclerosis. J Neurosci Methods 2021; 356:109143. [PMID: 33757762 DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2021.109143] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2021] [Revised: 02/20/2021] [Accepted: 03/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a neuroinflammatory disease resulting in axonal demyelination and an amalgamation of symptoms which commonly result in decreased quality of life due to mobility dysfunction and limited participation in meaningful activities. NEW METHOD The use of non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) techniques, specifically transcranial magnetic and transcranial direct current stimulation, have been essential in understanding the pathophysiological decrements related to disease progression, particularly with regard to motor impairments. Although the research in this area has primarily focused on the upper extremities, new interest has arisen in understanding the neurophysiological underpinnings of lower limb impairment. Therefore, the purpose of this review is to: first, provide an overview of common NIBS techniques used to explore sensorimotor neurophysiology; second, summarize lower limb neuromuscular and mobility impairments typically observed in PwMS; third, review the current knowledge regarding interactions between TMS-assessed neurophysiology and lower limb impairments in PwMS; and fourth, provide recommendations for future NIBS studies based on current gaps in the literature. RESULTS PwMS exhibit reduced excitability and increased inhibitory neurophysiologic function which has been related to disease severity and lower limb motor impairments. Comparison with existing methods: Moreover, promising results indicate that the use of repetitive stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation may prime neural adaptability and prove useful as a therapeutic tool in ameliorating lower limb impairments. CONCLUSIONS While these studies are both informative and promising, additional studies are necessary to be conclusive. As such, studies assessing objective measures of lower limb impairments associated with neurophysiological adaptations need further evaluation.
Collapse
|
28
|
Aloizou AM, Pateraki G, Anargyros K, Siokas V, Bakirtzis C, Liampas I, Nousia A, Nasios G, Sgantzos M, Peristeri E, Dardiotis E. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and repetitive TMS in multiple sclerosis. Rev Neurosci 2021; 32:723-736. [PMID: 33641274 DOI: 10.1515/revneuro-2020-0140] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2020] [Accepted: 02/05/2021] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is the most well-known autoimmune disorder of the central nervous system, and constitutes a major cause of disability, especially in young individuals. A wide array of pharmacological treatments is available, but they have often been proven to be ineffective in ameliorating disease symptomatology or slowing disease progress. As such, non-invasive and non-pharmacological techniques have been gaining more ground. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) utilizes the electric field generated by a magnetic coil to stimulate neurons and has been applied, usually paired with electroencephalography, to study the underlying pathophysiology of MS, and in repetitive trains, in the form of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), to induce long-lasting changes in neuronal circuits. In this review, we present the available literature on the application of TMS and rTMS in the context of MS, with an emphasis on its therapeutic potential on various clinical aspects, while also naming the ongoing trials, whose results are anticipated in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Athina-Maria Aloizou
- Department of Neurology,Laboratory of Neurogenetics, University of Thessaly, University Hospital of Larissa, Biopolis, Mezourlo Hill, 41100Larissa, Greece
| | - Georgia Pateraki
- Department of Neurology,Laboratory of Neurogenetics, University of Thessaly, University Hospital of Larissa, Biopolis, Mezourlo Hill, 41100Larissa, Greece
| | - Konstantinos Anargyros
- Department of Neurology,Laboratory of Neurogenetics, University of Thessaly, University Hospital of Larissa, Biopolis, Mezourlo Hill, 41100Larissa, Greece
| | - Vasileios Siokas
- Department of Neurology,Laboratory of Neurogenetics, University of Thessaly, University Hospital of Larissa, Biopolis, Mezourlo Hill, 41100Larissa, Greece
| | - Christos Bakirtzis
- B' Department of Neurology, AHEPA University Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Ioannis Liampas
- Department of Neurology,Laboratory of Neurogenetics, University of Thessaly, University Hospital of Larissa, Biopolis, Mezourlo Hill, 41100Larissa, Greece
| | - Anastasia Nousia
- Department of Speech and Language Therapy, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece
| | - Grigorios Nasios
- Department of Speech and Language Therapy, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece
| | - Markos Sgantzos
- Department of Neurology,Laboratory of Neurogenetics, University of Thessaly, University Hospital of Larissa, Biopolis, Mezourlo Hill, 41100Larissa, Greece
| | - Eleni Peristeri
- Department of Neurology,Laboratory of Neurogenetics, University of Thessaly, University Hospital of Larissa, Biopolis, Mezourlo Hill, 41100Larissa, Greece
| | - Efthimios Dardiotis
- Department of Neurology,Laboratory of Neurogenetics, University of Thessaly, University Hospital of Larissa, Biopolis, Mezourlo Hill, 41100Larissa, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Zucchella C, Mantovani E, De Icco R, Tassorelli C, Sandrini G, Tamburin S. Non-invasive Brain and Spinal Stimulation for Pain and Related Symptoms in Multiple Sclerosis: A Systematic Review. Front Neurosci 2020; 14:547069. [PMID: 33328843 PMCID: PMC7715002 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2020.547069] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2020] [Accepted: 10/09/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Neuropathic and nociceptive pain frequently affect patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), with a prevalence close to 90% and significant impact on general health and quality of life. Pharmacological strategies are widely used to treat pain in MS, but their effectiveness and side-effects are controversial. Among non-pharmacological treatments for pain, non-invasive brain and spinal stimulation (NIBSS) has shown promising preliminary results in MS. Objective: Systematic review to investigate the effect of NIBSS for the management of pain in MS. Methods: A literature search using Pubmed, Science Direct and Web of Science was conducted from databases inception to February 21, 2020 for studies assessing the analgesic effect of NIBSS on pain in MS. Results: A total of 279 records were title- and abstract-screened, nine were assessed for full text and included. The NIBSS techniques explored were transcranial direct current stimulation (N = 5), transcranial magnetic stimulation (N = 2), transcranial random noise stimulation (N =1), transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation (N = 1). The targets were the primary motor cortex (M1; N = 4), the left dorsolateral pre-frontal cortex (DLPFC; N = 3), the spinal cord (N = 1), unspecified brain target (N = 1). The study designs were randomized (N = 7), open label (N = 1), single case report (N = 1). Despite the differences in study design, target and NIBSS technique that impeded a meta-analysis, all the studies converge in showing a significant improvement of pain after active NIBSS with less consistent effects on other symptoms of the pain-related cluster (depression, fatigue, cognition) and quality of life. Conclusions: Excitatory NIBSS over M1, left DLPFC and spinal cord appear to be the most effective protocols for pain in MS. Open questions include the use of neurophysiological or neuroimaging surrogate outcome measures, the stratification of patients according to the clinical profiles and underlying pathogenetic mechanisms and the combination of NIBSS to pharmacological treatment, neurorehabilitation, or psychotherapy to improve the clinical effect. The duration of the effect to NIBSS and the feasibility and efficacy of telemedicine NIBSS protocols are other open key questions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chiara Zucchella
- Section of Neurology, Department of Neurosciences, Verona University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Elisa Mantovani
- Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Roberto De Icco
- Neurorehabilitation Unit, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, Pavia, Italy.,Department of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Cristina Tassorelli
- Neurorehabilitation Unit, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, Pavia, Italy.,Department of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Giorgio Sandrini
- Neurorehabilitation Unit, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, Pavia, Italy.,Department of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Stefano Tamburin
- Section of Neurology, Department of Neurosciences, Verona University Hospital, Verona, Italy.,Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Thomson AC, Sack AT. How to Design Optimal Accelerated rTMS Protocols Capable of Promoting Therapeutically Beneficial Metaplasticity. Front Neurol 2020; 11:599918. [PMID: 33224103 PMCID: PMC7674552 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2020.599918] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2020] [Accepted: 10/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Alix C Thomson
- Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.,Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience (MHeNS), Maastricht, Netherlands.,Centre for Integrative Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Alexander T Sack
- Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.,Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience (MHeNS), Maastricht, Netherlands.,Centre for Integrative Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Agüera E, Caballero-Villarraso J, Feijóo M, Escribano BM, Bahamonde MC, Conde C, Galván A, Túnez I. Impact of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Neurocognition and Oxidative Stress in Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis: A Case Report. Front Neurol 2020; 11:817. [PMID: 32903741 PMCID: PMC7438891 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2020.00817] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2020] [Accepted: 06/29/2020] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a neurodegenerative condition whose manifestation and clinical evolution can present themselves in very different ways. Analogously, its treatment has to be personalized and the patient's response may be idiosyncratic. At this moment there is no cure for it, in addition to its clinical course sometimes being torpid, with a poor response to any treatment. However, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) has demonstrated its usefulness as a non-invasive therapeutic tool for the treatment of some psychiatric and neurodegenerative diseases. Some studies show that the application of rTMS implies improvement in patients with MS at various levels, but the effects at the psychometric level and the redox profile in blood have never been studied before, despite the fact that both aspects have been related to the severity of MS and its evolution. Here we present the case of a woman diagnosed with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) at the age of 33, with a rapid progression of her illness and a poor response to different treatments previously prescribed for 9 years. In view of the patient's clinical course, a compassionate treatment with rTMS for 1 year was proposed. Starting from the fourth month of treatment, when reviewing the status of her disease, the patient denoted a clear improvement at different levels. There followed out psychometric evaluations and blood analyses, that showed both an improvement in her neuropsychological functions and a reduction in oxidative stress in plasma, in correspondence with therTMS treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eduardo Agüera
- Instituto Maimónides de Investigación Biomédica de Córdoba (IMIBIC), Córdoba, Spain.,Unidad de Gestión Clínica de Neurología, Hospital Universitario Reina Sofía, Córdoba, Spain
| | - Javier Caballero-Villarraso
- Instituto Maimónides de Investigación Biomédica de Córdoba (IMIBIC), Córdoba, Spain.,Departmento de Bioquímica y Biología Molecular, Facultad de Medicina y Enfermería, Universidad de Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain.,Unidad de Gestión Clínica de Análisis Clínicos, Hospital Universitario Reina Sofía, Córdoba, Spain.,Departamento de Biología Celular, Fisiología e Inmunología, Universidad de Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain
| | - Montserrat Feijóo
- Instituto Maimónides de Investigación Biomédica de Córdoba (IMIBIC), Córdoba, Spain.,Departmento de Bioquímica y Biología Molecular, Facultad de Medicina y Enfermería, Universidad de Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain
| | - Begoña M Escribano
- Instituto Maimónides de Investigación Biomédica de Córdoba (IMIBIC), Córdoba, Spain.,Departamento de Biología Celular, Fisiología e Inmunología, Universidad de Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain
| | - María C Bahamonde
- Instituto Maimónides de Investigación Biomédica de Córdoba (IMIBIC), Córdoba, Spain.,Unidad de Gestión Clínica de Neurología, Hospital Universitario Reina Sofía, Córdoba, Spain
| | - Cristina Conde
- Instituto Maimónides de Investigación Biomédica de Córdoba (IMIBIC), Córdoba, Spain
| | - Alberto Galván
- Instituto Maimónides de Investigación Biomédica de Córdoba (IMIBIC), Córdoba, Spain.,Departmento de Bioquímica y Biología Molecular, Facultad de Medicina y Enfermería, Universidad de Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain
| | - Isaac Túnez
- Instituto Maimónides de Investigación Biomédica de Córdoba (IMIBIC), Córdoba, Spain.,Departmento de Bioquímica y Biología Molecular, Facultad de Medicina y Enfermería, Universidad de Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Thompson AK, Sinkjær T. Can Operant Conditioning of EMG-Evoked Responses Help to Target Corticospinal Plasticity for Improving Motor Function in People With Multiple Sclerosis? Front Neurol 2020; 11:552. [PMID: 32765389 PMCID: PMC7381136 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2020.00552] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2020] [Accepted: 05/15/2020] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Corticospinal pathway and its function are essential in motor control and motor rehabilitation. Multiple sclerosis (MS) causes damage to the brain and descending connections, and often diminishes corticospinal function. In people with MS, neural plasticity is available, although it does not necessarily remain stable over the course of disease progress. Thus, inducing plasticity to the corticospinal pathway so as to improve its function may lead to motor control improvements, which impact one's mobility, health, and wellness. In order to harness plasticity in people with MS, over the past two decades, non-invasive brain stimulation techniques have been examined for addressing common symptoms, such as cognitive deficits, fatigue, and spasticity. While these methods appear promising, when it comes to motor rehabilitation, just inducing plasticity or having a capacity for it does not guarantee generation of better motor functions. Targeting plasticity to a key pathway, such as the corticospinal pathway, could change what limits one's motor control and improve function. One of such neural training methods is operant conditioning of the motor-evoked potential that aims to train the behavior of the corticospinal-motoneuron pathway. Through up-conditioning training, the person learns to produce the rewarded neuronal behavior/state of increased corticospinal excitability, and through iterative training, the rewarded behavior/state becomes one's habitual, daily motor behavior. This minireview introduces operant conditioning approach for people with MS. Guiding beneficial CNS plasticity on top of continuous disease progress may help to prolong the duration of maintained motor function and quality of life in people living with MS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aiko K Thompson
- Department of Health Sciences and Research, College of Health Professions, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
| | - Thomas Sinkjær
- Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.,Lundbeck Foundation, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
|
34
|
Capone F, Motolese F, Falato E, Rossi M, Di Lazzaro V. The Potential Role of Neurophysiology in the Management of Multiple Sclerosis-Related Fatigue. Front Neurol 2020; 11:251. [PMID: 32425869 PMCID: PMC7212459 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2020.00251] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2020] [Accepted: 03/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Fatigue is a very common symptom among people with multiple sclerosis (MS), but its management in clinical practice is limited by the lack of clear evidence about the pathogenic mechanisms, objective tools for diagnosis, and effective pharmacological treatments. In this scenario, neurophysiology could play a decisive role, thanks to its ability to provide objective measures and to explore the peripheral and the central structures of the nervous system. We hereby review and discuss current evidence about the potential role of neurophysiology in the management of MS-related fatigue. In the first part, we describe the use of neurophysiological techniques for exploring the pathogenic mechanisms of fatigue. In the second part, we review the potential application of neurophysiology for monitoring the response to pharmacological therapies. Finally, we show data about the therapeutic implications of neurophysiological techniques based on non-invasive brain stimulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fioravante Capone
- Unit of Neurology, Neurophysiology, Department of Medicine, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Rome, Italy.,NeXT: Neurophysiology and Neuroengineering of Human-Technology Interaction Research Unit, Campus Bio-Medico University, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Motolese
- Unit of Neurology, Neurophysiology, Department of Medicine, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Rome, Italy.,NeXT: Neurophysiology and Neuroengineering of Human-Technology Interaction Research Unit, Campus Bio-Medico University, Rome, Italy
| | - Emma Falato
- Unit of Neurology, Neurophysiology, Department of Medicine, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Rome, Italy.,NeXT: Neurophysiology and Neuroengineering of Human-Technology Interaction Research Unit, Campus Bio-Medico University, Rome, Italy
| | - Mariagrazia Rossi
- Unit of Neurology, Neurophysiology, Department of Medicine, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Rome, Italy.,NeXT: Neurophysiology and Neuroengineering of Human-Technology Interaction Research Unit, Campus Bio-Medico University, Rome, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Di Lazzaro
- Unit of Neurology, Neurophysiology, Department of Medicine, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Lefaucheur JP, Aleman A, Baeken C, Benninger DH, Brunelin J, Di Lazzaro V, Filipović SR, Grefkes C, Hasan A, Hummel FC, Jääskeläinen SK, Langguth B, Leocani L, Londero A, Nardone R, Nguyen JP, Nyffeler T, Oliveira-Maia AJ, Oliviero A, Padberg F, Palm U, Paulus W, Poulet E, Quartarone A, Rachid F, Rektorová I, Rossi S, Sahlsten H, Schecklmann M, Szekely D, Ziemann U. Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS): An update (2014-2018). Clin Neurophysiol 2020; 131:474-528. [PMID: 31901449 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2019.11.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 965] [Impact Index Per Article: 241.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2019] [Revised: 10/21/2019] [Accepted: 11/02/2019] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
A group of European experts reappraised the guidelines on the therapeutic efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) previously published in 2014 [Lefaucheur et al., Clin Neurophysiol 2014;125:2150-206]. These updated recommendations take into account all rTMS publications, including data prior to 2014, as well as currently reviewed literature until the end of 2018. Level A evidence (definite efficacy) was reached for: high-frequency (HF) rTMS of the primary motor cortex (M1) contralateral to the painful side for neuropathic pain; HF-rTMS of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) using a figure-of-8 or a H1-coil for depression; low-frequency (LF) rTMS of contralesional M1 for hand motor recovery in the post-acute stage of stroke. Level B evidence (probable efficacy) was reached for: HF-rTMS of the left M1 or DLPFC for improving quality of life or pain, respectively, in fibromyalgia; HF-rTMS of bilateral M1 regions or the left DLPFC for improving motor impairment or depression, respectively, in Parkinson's disease; HF-rTMS of ipsilesional M1 for promoting motor recovery at the post-acute stage of stroke; intermittent theta burst stimulation targeted to the leg motor cortex for lower limb spasticity in multiple sclerosis; HF-rTMS of the right DLPFC in posttraumatic stress disorder; LF-rTMS of the right inferior frontal gyrus in chronic post-stroke non-fluent aphasia; LF-rTMS of the right DLPFC in depression; and bihemispheric stimulation of the DLPFC combining right-sided LF-rTMS (or continuous theta burst stimulation) and left-sided HF-rTMS (or intermittent theta burst stimulation) in depression. Level A/B evidence is not reached concerning efficacy of rTMS in any other condition. The current recommendations are based on the differences reached in therapeutic efficacy of real vs. sham rTMS protocols, replicated in a sufficient number of independent studies. This does not mean that the benefit produced by rTMS inevitably reaches a level of clinical relevance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jean-Pascal Lefaucheur
- ENT Team, EA4391, Faculty of Medicine, Paris Est Créteil University, Créteil, France; Clinical Neurophysiology Unit, Department of Physiology, Henri Mondor Hospital, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Créteil, France.
| | - André Aleman
- Department of Biomedical Sciences of Cells and Systems, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Chris Baeken
- Department of Psychiatry and Medical Psychology, Ghent Experimental Psychiatry (GHEP) Lab, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium; Department of Psychiatry, University Hospital (UZBrussel), Brussels, Belgium; Department of Electrical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - David H Benninger
- Neurology Service, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Jérôme Brunelin
- PsyR2 Team, U1028, INSERM and UMR5292, CNRS, Center for Neuroscience Research of Lyon (CRNL), Centre Hospitalier Le Vinatier, Lyon-1 University, Bron, France
| | - Vincenzo Di Lazzaro
- Unit of Neurology, Neurophysiology, Neurobiology, Department of Medicine, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Rome, Italy
| | - Saša R Filipović
- Department of Human Neuroscience, Institute for Medical Research, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Christian Grefkes
- Department of Neurology, Cologne University Hospital, Cologne, Germany; Institute of Neurosciences and Medicine (INM3), Jülich Research Centre, Jülich, Germany
| | - Alkomiet Hasan
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Friedhelm C Hummel
- Defitech Chair in Clinical Neuroengineering, Center for Neuroprosthetics (CNP) and Brain Mind Institute (BMI), Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (EPFL), Geneva, Switzerland; Defitech Chair in Clinical Neuroengineering, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (EPFL) Valais and Clinique Romande de Réadaptation, Sion, Switzerland; Clinical Neuroscience, University of Geneva Medical School, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Satu K Jääskeläinen
- Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Turku University Hospital and University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - Berthold Langguth
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Letizia Leocani
- Department of Neurorehabilitation and Experimental Neurophysiology Unit, Institute of Experimental Neurology (INSPE), IRCCS San Raffaele, University Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Alain Londero
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Université Paris Descartes Sorbonne Paris Cité, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Paris, France
| | - Raffaele Nardone
- Department of Neurology, Franz Tappeiner Hospital, Merano, Italy; Department of Neurology, Christian Doppler Medical Center, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria; Karl Landsteiner Institut für Neurorehabilitation und Raumfahrtneurologie, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Jean-Paul Nguyen
- Multidisciplinary Pain Center, Clinique Bretéché, ELSAN, Nantes, France; Multidisciplinary Pain, Palliative and Supportive Care Center, UIC22-CAT2-EA3826, University Hospital, CHU Nord-Laënnec, Nantes, France
| | - Thomas Nyffeler
- Gerontechnology and Rehabilitation Group, ARTORG Center for Biomedical Engineering Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland; Perception and Eye Movement Laboratory, Department of Neurology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland; Neurocenter, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Lucerne, Switzerland
| | - Albino J Oliveira-Maia
- Champalimaud Research & Clinical Centre, Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Lisbon, Portugal; Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Ocidental, Lisbon, Portugal; NOVA Medical School
- Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Antonio Oliviero
- FENNSI Group, Hospital Nacional de Parapléjicos, SESCAM, Toledo, Spain
| | - Frank Padberg
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Ulrich Palm
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany; Medical Park Chiemseeblick, Bernau, Germany
| | - Walter Paulus
- Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Emmanuel Poulet
- PsyR2 Team, U1028, INSERM and UMR5292, CNRS, Center for Neuroscience Research of Lyon (CRNL), Centre Hospitalier Le Vinatier, Lyon-1 University, Bron, France; Department of Emergency Psychiatry, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Groupement Hospitalier Centre, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Angelo Quartarone
- Department of Biomedical, Dental Sciences and Morphological and Functional Images, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | | | - Irena Rektorová
- Applied Neuroscience Research Group, Central European Institute of Technology, CEITEC MU, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic; First Department of Neurology, St. Anne's University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Simone Rossi
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, Si-BIN Lab Human Physiology Section, Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology Unit, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
| | - Hanna Sahlsten
- ENT Clinic, Mehiläinen and University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - Martin Schecklmann
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - David Szekely
- Department of Psychiatry, Princess Grace Hospital, Monaco
| | - Ulf Ziemann
- Department of Neurology and Stroke, and Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Eberhard Karls University, Tübingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Leocani L, Chieffo R, Gentile A, Centonze D. Beyond rehabilitation in MS: Insights from non-invasive brain stimulation. Mult Scler 2019; 25:1363-1371. [PMID: 31469356 DOI: 10.1177/1352458519865734] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Although the number of disease-modifying treatments for people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS) has meaningfully increased in the past years, targeting repair or compensation for central nervous system damage associated with the disease process remains an important clinical goal. With this aim, neurorehabilitation is a powerful approach targeting central nervous system plasticity. Another driver of brain plasticity is non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS), receiving recent attention in neurology, particularly for its potential synergy with neurorehabilitation and as add-on treatment for several neurological conditions, from pain to fatigue to sensorimotor and cognitive deficits. In this review, we will resume the evidence exploring the neurobiological basis of NIBS and its applications to MS-related conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Letizia Leocani
- Neurorehabilitation Unit and INSPE-Institute of Experimental Neurology, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy/Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Raffaella Chieffo
- Neurorehabilitation Unit and INSPE-Institute of Experimental Neurology, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Antonietta Gentile
- Synaptic Immunopathology Lab, Department of Systems Medicine, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - Diego Centonze
- Synaptic Immunopathology Lab, Department of Systems Medicine, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy/Neurology Unit, IRCCS Neuromed, Pozzilli, Italy
| |
Collapse
|