Joint European Academy of Neurology-European Pain Federation-Neuropathic Pain Special Interest Group of the International Association for the Study of Pain guidelines on neuropathic pain assessment

Genetic associations of neuropathic pain and sensory profile in a deeply phenotyped neuropathy cohort

ABSTRACT

We aimed to investigate the genetic associations of neuropathic pain in a deeply phenotyped cohort. Participants with neuropathic pain were cases and compared with those exposed to injury or disease but without neuropathic pain as control subjects. Diabetic polyneuropathy was the most common aetiology of neuropathic pain. A standardised quantitative sensory testing protocol was used to categorize participants based on sensory profile. We performed genome-wide association study, and in a subset of participants, we undertook whole-exome sequencing targeting analyses of 45 known pain-related genes. In the genome-wide association study of diabetic neuropathy (N = 1541), a top significant association was found at the KCNT2 locus linked with pain intensity (rs114159097, P = 3.55 × 10 -8 ). Gene-based analysis revealed significant associations between LHX8 and TCF7L2 and neuropathic pain. Polygenic risk score for depression was associated with neuropathic pain in all participants. Polygenic risk score for C-reactive protein showed a positive association, while that for fasting insulin showed a negative association with neuropathic pain, in individuals with diabetic polyneuropathy. Gene burden analysis of candidate pain genes supported significant associations between rare variants in SCN9A and OPRM1 and neuropathic pain. Comparison of individuals with the "irritable" nociceptor profile to those with a "nonirritable" nociceptor profile identified a significantly associated variant (rs72669682, P = 4.39 × 10 -8 ) within the ANK2 gene. Our study on a deeply phenotyped cohort with neuropathic pain has confirmed genetic associations with the known pain-related genes KCNT2 , OPRM1 , and SCN9A and identified novel associations with LHX8 and ANK2 , genes not previously linked to pain and sensory profiles, respectively.

Harmonizing neuropathic pain research: outcomes of the London consensus meeting on peripheral tissue studies

ABSTRACT

Neuropathic pain remains difficult to treat, with drug development hampered by an incomplete understanding of the pathogenesis of the condition, as well as a lack of biomarkers. The problem is compounded by the scarcity of relevant human peripheral tissues, including skin, nerves, and dorsal root ganglia. Efforts to obtain such samples are accelerating, increasing the need for standardisation across laboratories. In this white paper, we report on a consensus meeting attended by neuropathic pain experts, designed to accelerate protocol alignment and harmonization of studies involving relevant peripheral tissues. The meeting was held in London in March 2024 and attended by 28 networking partners, including industry and patient representatives. We achieved consensus on minimal recommended phenotyping, harmonised wet laboratory protocols, statistical design, reporting, and data sharing. Here, we also share a variety of relevant standard operating procedures as supplementary protocols. We envision that our recommendations will help unify human tissue research in the field and accelerate our understanding of how abnormal interactions between sensory neurons and their local peripheral environment contribute towards neuropathic pain.

Pharmacotherapy and non-invasive neuromodulation for neuropathic pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

There remains a substantial unmet need for effective and safe treatments for neuropathic pain. The Neuropathic Pain Special Interest Group aimed to update treatment recommendations, published in 2015, on the basis of new evidence from randomised controlled trials, emerging neuromodulation techniques, and advances in evidence synthesis.

METHODS

For this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched Embase, PubMed, the International Clinical Trials Registry, and ClinicalTrials.gov from data inception for neuromodulation trials and from Jan 1, 2013, for pharmacological interventions until Feb 12, 2024. We included double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trials that evaluated pharmacological and neuromodulation treatments administered for at least 3 weeks, or if there was at least 3 weeks of follow-up, and which included at least ten participants per group. Trials included participants of any age with neuropathic pain, defined by the International Association for the Study of Pain. We excluded trials with enriched enrolment randomised withdrawal designs and those with participants with mixed aetiologies (ie, neuropathic and non-neuropathic pain) and conditions such as complex regional pain syndrome, low back pain without radicular pain, fibromyalgia, and idiopathic orofacial pain. We extracted summary data in duplicate from published reports, with discrepancies reconciled by a third independent reviewer on the platform Covidence. The primary efficacy outcome was the proportion of responders (50% or 30% reduction in baseline pain intensity or moderate pain relief). The primary safety outcome was the number of participants who withdrew from the treatment owing to adverse events. We calculated a risk difference for each comparison and did a random-effects meta-analysis. Risk differences were used to calculate the number needed to treat (NNT) and the number needed to harm (NNH) for each treatment. Risk of bias was assessed by use of the Cochrane risk of bias tool 2 and certainty of evidence assessed by use of GRADE. Recommendations were based on evidence of efficacy, adverse events, accessibility, and cost, and feedback from engaged lived experience partners. This study is registered on PROSPERO, CRD42023389375.

FINDINGS

We identified 313 trials (284 pharmacological and 29 neuromodulation studies) for inclusion in the meta-analysis. Across all studies, 48 789 adult participants were randomly assigned to trial groups (20 611 female and 25 078 male participants, where sex was reported). Estimates for the primary efficacy and safety outcomes were tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) NNT=4·6 (95% CI 3·2-7·7), NNH=17·1 (11·4-33·6; moderate certainty of evidence), α2δ-ligands NNT=8·9 (7·4-11·10), NNH=26·2 (20·4-36·5; moderate certainty of evidence), serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) NNT=7·4 (5·6-10·9), NNH=13·9 (10·9-19·0; moderate certainty of evidence), botulinum toxin (BTX-A) NNT=2·7 (1·8-9·61), NNH=216·3 (23·5-∞; moderate certainty of evidence), capsaicin 8% patches NNT=13·2 (7·6-50·8), NNH=1129·3 (135·7-∞; moderate certainty of evidence), opioids NNT=5·9 (4·1-10·7), NNH=15·4 (10·8-24·0; low certainty of evidence), repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) NNT=4·2 (2·3-28·3), NNH=651·6 (34·7-∞; low certainty of evidence), capsaicin cream NNT=6·1 (3·1-∞), NNH=18·6 (10·6-77·1; very low certainty of evidence), lidocaine 5% plasters NNT=14·5 (7·8-108·2), NNH=178·0 (23·9-∞; very low certainty of evidence). The findings provided the basis for a strong recommendation for use of TCAs, α2δ-ligands, and SNRIs as first-line treatments; a weak recommendation for capsaicin 8% patches, capsaicin cream, and lidocaine 5% plasters as second-line recommendation; and a weak recommendation for BTX-A, rTMS, and opioids as third-line treatments for neuropathic pain.

INTERPRETATION

Our results support a revision of the Neuropathic Pain Special Interest Group recommendations for the treatment of neuropathic pain. Treatment outcomes are modest and for some treatments uncertainty remains. Further large placebo-controlled or sham-controlled trials done over clinically relevant timeframes are needed.

FUNDING

NeuPSIG and ERA-NET Neuron.

Chronic postsurgical pain in the ICD-11: implications for anaesthesiology and pain medicine

Chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP) is associated with reduced health-related quality of life and disability. In some patients, it can result in long-term opioid use even after minor surgery. Epidemiological studies have reported highly varying rates of CPSP, largely because researchers have used different definitions with self-defined cut-offs for pain scores. With the introduction of the 11th revision of the World Health Organisation International Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (ICD-11), chronic pain is now recognised as an entity of its own, its biopsychosocial nature is emphasised, and its definition is standardised. Compared with the ICD-11 definition, the prevalence of CPSP might have been overestimated in previous studies. The ICD-11 provides a multifactorial assessment of pain severity, referring to pain intensity, pain-related interference, and pain-related distress, which cover the biopsychosocial aspects of chronic pain. These three scores can be added as extension codes to any pain diagnosis. Harmonisation of the CPSP criteria within the different coding levels of the ICD-11 might improve discrimination of CPSP from other chronic pain conditions not induced by surgery. Although neuropathic CPSP increases pain severity and requires alternative therapeutic approaches to nociceptive pain, a specific code to differentiate between neuropathic and non-neuropathic CPSP is not available. For clinical practice and research, the evidence-based ICD-11 definition, which provides clear-cut diagnostic criteria, should generally be used instead of pain scores alone. This will improve the comparability of data, form the basis for future diagnostic and therapeutic approaches, and facilitate communication.

Predictors for quality of life improvement following rTMS treatment in neuropathic pain patients

OBJECTIVES

Recently, Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) has gained attention for its potential in relieving neuropathic pain (NP). NP encompasses central and peripheral neuralgia, characterized by sensory abnormalities and spontaneous pain. Pharmacological treatments often provide partial relief with significant side effects, making rTMS an attractive alternative. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of rTMS in treating NP and its impact on quality of life over three months.

METHODS

A total of 51 patients with drug-resistant NP were included, undergoing 15 sessions of rTMS targeting motor cortex areas over three weeks. Clinical response was evaluated using various psychometric scales, including VAS for pain and PGIC. Quality of life was assessed using the SF-36 questionnaire.

RESULTS

Results showed significant clinical improvements in pain severity and quality of life following rTMS treatment. Predictive factors of quality of life improvement were identified, with mental health being crucial across all NP areas. Notably, patients with cerebral NP showed improvements linked to physical dimensions, emphasizing tailored treatment approaches.

CONCLUSIONS

This study underscores the efficacy of rTMS in managing NP, highlighting sustained improvements in pain severity and quality of life. The findings offer valuable insights for personalized treatment approaches and optimizing patient outcomes in NP management.

Trigeminal reflex testing abnormalities as a predictive model for distinguishing classical and idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia

OBJECTIVE

Primary trigeminal neuralgia (TN) is a representative neuropathic facial pain condition classified into classical (associated with neurovascular compression), and idiopathic (unknown etiology). Differentiating between classical and idiopathic TN based on clinical and neurophysiological findings remains challenging. In this clinical and neurophysiological study, we aimed to identify predictive clinical and neurophysiological variables that may distinguish between the two types of TN.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed clinical records and neurophysiological data from 114 patients with primary TN (84 classical TN, 30 idiopathic TN). We implemented a logistic regression model to identify predictive variables for classical and idiopathic TN.

RESULTS

The logistic regression model showed that a trigeminal reflex latency asymmetry longer than 0.5 ms between the affected and unaffected sides was predictive of classical TN (p < 0.05). Additionally, combined involvement of the second and third trigeminal divisions was predictive of idiopathic TN (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggesting that latency asymmetry in trigeminal reflexes differentiate between classical and idiopathic TN probably reflects the association of classical TN with neurovascular compression, while idiopathic TN may involve other factors affecting trigeminal nerve fibers.

SIGNIFICANCE

Our results enhance our understanding of pathophysiology of TN and could improve clinical differentiation between its types.

The association between age and acute pain sensitivity in patients with Herpes Zoster

Herpes zoster has a well-established increased incidence in older adults, but the relationship between age and acute pain severity remains less clear. This retrospective study aimed to explore the association between age and pain intensity in Herpes zoster patients. A total of 613 patients treated at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University were included. Pain intensity was measured using the Numerical Rating Scale-11, and statistical models were applied to evaluate age-related pain differences while controlling for confounders. While older age was associated with higher pain scores (β = 0.02, p < 0.001), the effect size was small. Other factors, such as pain duration and inflammatory markers (e.g., CRP levels), showed stronger associations with pain severity. These findings suggest that age may not be the dominant factor in Herpes zoster pain severity, and a more comprehensive approach is required for risk assessment and pain management in clinical practice.

Small-Fiber Neuropathy: An Etiology-Oriented Review

BACKGROUND

Small-fiber neuropathy (SFN), affecting Aδ or C nerve fibers, is characterized by alterations of pain and temperature sensation, as well as autonomic dysfunction. Its diagnosis may still remain challenging as methods specifically assessing small nerve fibers are not always readily available, and standard techniques for large-fiber neuropathies, such as electroneuromyography, yield negative results. Still, skin biopsy for epidermal innervation and quantitative sensory testing allow for diagnosis in the presence of a congruent clinical picture.

OBJECTIVES

Many different etiologies may underlie small-fiber neuropathy, of which metabolic (diabetes mellitus/impaired glucose tolerance) and idiopathic remain prevalent. The aim of this narrative review is to provide a general picture of SFN while focusing on the different etiologies described in the literature in order to raise awareness of the variegated set of different causes of SFN and promote adequate diagnostic investigation.

METHODS

The term "Small-Fiber Neuropathy" was searched on the PubMed database with its different recognized etiologies: the abstracts of the articles were reviewed and described in the article if relevant for a total of 40 studies.

RESULTS

Many different disorders have been associated with SFN, even though often in the form of case reports or small case series.

CONCLUSIONS

Idiopathic forms of SFN remain the most prevalent in the literature, but association with different disorders (e.g., infectious, autoimmune) should prompt investigation for SFN in the presence of a congruent clinical picture (e.g., pain with neuropathic features).

The Challenge of Managing Neuropathic Pain in Children and Adolescents with Cancer

Neuropathic pain (NP) is a common complication associated with some types of childhood cancer, mainly due to nerve compression, chronic post-surgical pain, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy. NP is usually less responsive to traditional analgesics, and there is generally a lack of evidence on its management in cancer patients, leading to recommendations often based on clinical trials conducted on other forms of non-malignant NP. In pediatric oncology, managing NP is still very challenging for physicians. Different factors contribute to increasing the risk of undertreatment: (a) children may be unable to describe the quality of pain; therefore, the risk for NP to be underestimated or remain unrecognized; (b) specific tools to diagnose NP have not been validated in children; (c) there is a lack of randomized clinical trials involving children, with most evidence being based on case series and case reports; (d) most drugs used for adult patients are not approved for childhood cancers, and drug regulation varies among different countries; (e) recommendations for pediatric pain treatment are still not available. In this paper, a multidisciplinary team will review the current literature regarding children with cancer-related NP to define the best possible diagnostic strategies (e.g., clinical and instrumental tests) and propose a therapeutic care pathway, including both non-pharmacological and pharmacological approaches, which could help pediatricians, oncologists, neurologists, and pain therapists in designing the most effective multidisciplinary approach.

Pain Assessment and Management in Oncological Practice: A Survey from the Italian Network of Supportive Care in Oncology

Background/Objectives: Cancer pain is prevalent across all stages of the disease, significantly impacting patients' lives. Despite the availability of guidelines, its assessment and management remain suboptimal in many clinical settings. This study aimed to explore how healthcare professionals in Italy assess and manage cancer pain, identifying gaps and educational needs to improve adherence to best practices. Methods: A multidisciplinary Scientific Board designed an online survey comprising 28 items addressing demographics, pain assessment tools, perception of pain, pharmacological management, adverse effects, and barriers to care. The survey targeted oncologists, nurses, radiotherapists, and surgeons within the Italian Network of Supportive Care in Oncology. Data were collected from March to May 2024 and analyzed descriptively. Results: Eighty-five professionals participated, predominantly oncologists (63.5%). Most respondents utilized pain scales, with the Numerical Rating Scale (60.3%) being the most frequent. However, specific tools like the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) were underutilized, possibly due to limited training and time constraints. Factors influencing analgesic choice included patient comorbidities (30.3%) and polypharmacy (28.0%). The main barriers to effective pain management included inadequate training (85.5%) and poor communication between patients and caregivers (40.6%) and within care teams (31.9%). Preventive measures for opioid-induced adverse events were widely employed, with laxatives (52.7%) and antiemetics (40.5%) being the most common. Conclusions: Findings underscore the need for structured training programs, improved communication, and integration of validated assessment tools. A multidisciplinary, proactive approach to cancer pain assessment and management is essential to optimize care and reduce its burden across all disease stages.

E-52862-A selective sigma-1 receptor antagonist, in peripheral neuropathic pain: Two randomized, double-blind, phase 2 studies in patients with chronic postsurgical pain and painful diabetic neuropathy

BACKGROUND

We report the efficacy and safety of E-52862-a selective, sigma-1 receptor antagonist-from phase 2, randomized, proof-of-concept studies in patients with moderate-to-severe, neuropathic, chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP) and painful diabetic neuropathy (PDN).

METHODS

Adult patients (CPSP [N = 116]; PDN [N = 163]) were randomized at a 1:1 ratio to 4 weeks of treatment with E-52862 (CPSP [n = 55]; PDN [n = 85]) or placebo (CPSP [n = 61]; PDN [n = 78]) orally once daily. Pain intensity scores were measured using a numerical pain rating scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable). The primary analysis population comprised patients who received study drug with ≥1 baseline and on-treatment observation (full analysis set).

RESULTS

In CPSP, mean baseline average pain was 6.2 for E-52862 vs. 6.5 for placebo. Week 4 mean change from baseline (CFB) for average pain was -1.6 for E-52862 vs. -0.9 for placebo (least squares mean difference [LSMD]: -0.9; p = 0.029). In PDN, mean baseline average pain was 5.3 for E-52862 vs. 5.4 for placebo. Week 4 mean CFB for average pain was -2.2 for E-52862 vs. -2.1 for placebo (LSMD: -0.1; p = 0.766). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported in 90.9% of E-52862-treated patients vs. 76.7% of placebo-treated patients in CPSP and 34.1% vs. 26.9% in PDN. Serious TEAEs occurred in CPSP only: E-52862: 5.5%; placebo: 6.7%.

CONCLUSIONS

E-52862 demonstrated superior relief of CPSP vs. placebo after 4 weeks. Reductions in pain intensity were seen in PDN with E-52862; high placebo response rates may have prevented differentiation between treatments. E-52862 had acceptable tolerability in both populations.

SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT

These proof-of-concept studies validate the mode of action of E-52862, a selective sigma-1 receptor antagonist. In CPSP, E-52862 resulted in clinically meaningful pain relief. In PDN, reductions in pain intensity were seen with E-52862; high placebo response rates may have prevented differentiation between E-52862 and placebo. These findings are clinically relevant given that neuropathic pain is highly incapacitating, lacking effective treatments and representing a significant unmet medical need, and support further development of sigma-1 receptor antagonists for peripheral neuropathic pain.

A pain research strategy for Europe: A European survey and position paper of the European Pain Federation EFIC

BACKGROUND

Pain is the leading cause of disability and reduced quality of life worldwide. Despite the increasing burden for patients and healthcare systems, pain research remains underfunded and under focused. Having stakeholders identify and prioritize areas that need urgent attention in the field will help focus funding topics, reduce 'research waste', improve the effectiveness of pain research and therapy and promote the uptake of research evidence. In this study, the European Pain Federation (EFIC) developed a Pain Research Strategy for Europe.

METHODS

The study used multiple methods, including literature searches, multidisciplinary expert debate, a survey and a final consensus meeting. The cross-sectional survey was conducted among 628 European pain researchers, clinicians, educators and industry professionals to obtain the rating and hierarchy of pain research priorities. The final consensus meeting involved a multidisciplinary expert panel including people with lived experience from 23 countries. The survey results guided discussions where top priorities were agreed.

RESULTS

Content analysis identified nine survey themes, of which five emerged as top priorities: (i) understand the pathophysiology of pain; (ii) understand and address comorbidities; (iii) critically assess current therapies; (iv) develop new treatments; and (v) explore the biopsychosocial impacts of pain. Physical, psychological and social approaches were prioritized at the same level as pharmacological treatments. The top priorities were endorsed by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The panel emphasized the importance of also clearly communicating the concepts of prediction, prevention self-management and personalized pain management in the final strategy.

CONCLUSIONS

The content of the final top research priorities' list reflects a holistic approach to pain management. The equal importance given to physical, psychological and social aspects alongside pharmacological treatments highlights the importance of a comprehensive biopsychosocial-orientated research strategy. The expert panel's endorsement of five top priorities, coupled with an emphasis on communicating the concepts of prediction, prevention, self-management and personalized pain management, provides a clear direction for future basic, translational and clinical research.

SIGNIFICANCE

EFIC has developed a Pain Research Strategy for Europe that identifies pain research areas deserving the most focus and financial support. Implementation and wide dissemination of this Strategy is vital to increase the conduct of urgent pain projects, pain research funding and the implementation of research findings into practice, to ultimately decrease the personal, societal and financial burden of pain.

The Diagnosis and Treatment of Neuropathic Pain

BACKGROUND

The reported prevalence of neuropathic pain in the general population in Germany is from 6.9% to 10%. There are both medical and surgical treatment options.

METHODS

This review is based on pertinent publications retrieved by a selective search in PubMed, with consideration of clinical trials, meta-analyses, and guidelines.

RESULTS

Neuropathic pain is diagnosed when pain of the appropriate character is accompanied by further features such as hypesthesia/anesthesia, allodynia, or hyperalgesia. It is generally treated initially with drugs (antidepressant drugs, anticonvulsant drugs, opioids, topical agents, and others); the number needed to treat (NNT) is between 7 and 8 for gabapentin and 3.6 for amitryptiline, as estimated in meta-analyses. For nerve compression and entrapment syndromes, surgical decompression is a treatment directed against the cause of the problem, which can therefore be curative. Microvascular decompression (MVD) is often used to treat supposed compression syndromes of cranial nerves, above all classic trigeminal neuralgia; according to a meta-analysis, MVD brings about a pain-free state in 92.9% [89.1; 96.8] of patients after 5 months to 5 years of follow-up. Ablative surgical procedures are used for symptom control in patients with refractory and/or cancer-related pain. Further symptomdirected treatment options for medically intractable neuropathic pain include neuromodulatory techniques, which involve minimally invasive electrical stimulation of neural structures, and the chronic intrathecal application of drugs such as opioids and ziconotide.

CONCLUSION

The treatment of neuropathic pain can be either cause-directed or symptom-directed, depending on its origin. Multidisciplinary collaboration can facilitate both the diagnostic evaluation and the selection of the optional modality and timing of treatment.

Assessing axonal pathology and disease progression in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy using corneal confocal microscopy

OBJECTIVE

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) is an autoimmune neuropathy characterized by progressive or relapsing-remitting weakness and sensory deficits. This study aims to evaluate the utility of corneal confocal microscopy (CCM) in diagnosing and monitoring CIDP.

METHODS

We analysed 100 CIDP patients and 31 healthy controls using CCM to measure corneal nerve fiber density (CNFD), length (CNFL), and branch density (CNBD). Standardized clinical and electroneurographic evaluation were conducted, and statistical analyses were performed to compare CCM parameters between groups and across disease stages.

RESULTS

CIDP patients and subgroups exhibited significant reduction in CNFD, CNFL, and CNBD compared to controls. This reduction was observed in late disease stages and severe overall disability sum score (ODSS), and Inflammatory Neuropathy Cause and Treatment Sensory Sum Score (ISS). CCM parameters correlated with axonal pathology in electroneurography of sensory, but not motor nerves. Despite the significant differences, the diagnostic sensitivity (41%) and specificity (77%) of CCM parameters were limited.

CONCLUSION

While CCM effectively differentiates CIDP patients from healthy controls and was associated with disease severity, its diagnostic accuracy for routine clinical use is a posteriori. However, CCM shows promise as a non-invasive tool for monitoring sensory axonal pathology in CIDP.

Phenotyping peripheral neuropathies with and without pruritus: a cross-sectional multicenter study

ABSTRACT

Pruritus often escapes physicians' attention in patients with peripheral neuropathy (PNP). Here we aimed to characterize neuropathic pruritus in a cohort of 191 patients with PNP (large, mixed, or small fiber) and 57 control subjects with deep phenotyping in a multicenter cross-sectional observational study at 3 German sites. All participants underwent thorough neurological examination, nerve conduction studies, quantitative sensory testing, and skin biopsies to assess intraepidermal nerve fiber density. Patients filled in a set of questionnaires assessing the characteristics of pruritus and pain, the presence of depression and anxiety, and quality of life. Based on the severity of pruritus and pain, patients were grouped into 4 groups: "pruritus," "pain," "pruritus and pain," and "no pruritus/no pain." Although 11% (21/191) of patients reported pruritus as their only symptom, further 34.6% (66/191) reported pruritus and pain. Patients with pain (with or without pruritus) were more affected by anxiety, depression, and reduced quality of life than control subjects. Patients with pruritus (with and without pain) had increases in cold detection threshold, showing Aδ-fiber dysfunction. The pruritus group had lower intraepidermal nerve fiber density at the thigh, concomitant with a more proximal distribution of symptoms compared with the other PNP groups. Stratification of patients with PNP by using cross-sectional datasets and multinominal logistic regression analysis revealed distinct patterns for the patient groups. Together, our study sheds light on the presence of neuropathic pruritus in patients with PNP and its relationship with neuropathic pain, outlines the sensory and structural abnormalities associated with neuropathic pruritus, and highlights its impact on anxiety levels.

Idiopathic Distal Sensory Polyneuropathy and Fibromyalgia Syndrome: A Comparative Phenotyping Study

INTRODUCTION

Painful idiopathic distal sensory polyneuropathy (IDSP) and fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS) are cryptogenic chronic pain syndromes. The contribution of small fibre pathology (SFP) in FMS remains controversial. This study aims to quantify small nerve pathology in participants with IDSP and FMS and identify relationships of SFP with sensory phenotypes.

METHODS

In this study, 73 individuals (FMS: 25, IDSP: 23, healthy volunteers: 25) underwent comprehensive assessment, including neurological exams, questionnaires, sensory tests, and corneal confocal microscopy.

RESULTS

IDSP participants displayed lower wind-up ratio (WUR) relative to FMS (p < 0.001), loss of function to thermal and mechanical stimuli and elevated neuropathy disability scores compared to FMS and healthy volunteers (all p < 0.001). FMS participants demonstrated gain of function to heat and blunt pressure pain responses relative to IDSP, and healthy volunteers (heat: p = 0.002 and p = 0.003; pressure: both p < 0.001) and WUR (both p < 0.001). FMS participants exhibited reduced corneal nerve fibre density (p = 0.02), while IDSP participants had lower global corneal nerve measures (density, branch density, and length) relative to healthy volunteers (all p < 0.001). Utilising corneal nerve fibre length, SFP was demonstrated in 66.6% of participants (FMS: 13/25; IDSP: 22/23).

CONCLUSION

Participants with SFP, in both FMS and IDSP, reported symptoms indicative of small nerve fibre disease. Although distinctions in pain distributions are evident between individuals with FMS and IDSP, over 50% of participants between the two conditions displayed both a loss and gain of thermal and mechanical function suggestive of shared mechanisms. However, sensory phenotypes were associated with the presence of SFP in IDSP but not in FMS.

Understanding neuropathic pain: the role of neurophysiological tests in unveiling underlying mechanisms

Neuropathic pain, arising from lesions of the somatosensory nervous system, presents with diverse symptoms including ongoing pain, paroxysmal pain, and provoked pain, usually accompanied by sensory deficits. Understanding the pathophysiological mechanisms behind these symptoms is crucial for targeted treatment strategies. Neurophysiological techniques such as nerve conduction studies, reflexes, and evoked potentials help elucidate these mechanisms by assessing large myelinated non-nociceptive fibres and small nociceptive fibres. This argumentative review highlights the importance of tailored neurophysiological assessments for improving our understanding of the pathophysiological mechanisms behind neuropathic pain symptoms.

Antibody selection and automated quantification of TRPV1 immunofluorescence on human skin

Assessing localization of the transient receptor potential vanilloid-1 (TRPV1) in skin nerve fibers is crucial for understanding its role in peripheral neuropathy and pain. However, information on the specificity and sensitivity of TRPV1 antibodies used for immunofluorescence (IF) on human skin is currently lacking. To find a reliable TRPV1 antibody and IF protocol, we explored antibody candidates from different manufacturers, used rat DRG sections and human skin samples for screening and human TRPV1-expressing HEK293 cells for further validation. Final specificity assessment was done on human skin samples. Additionally, we developed two automated image analysis methods: a Python-based deep-learning approach and a Fiji-based machine-learning approach. These methods involve training a model or classifier for nerve fibers based on pre-annotations and utilize a nerve fiber mask to filter and count TRPV1 immunoreactive puncta and TRPV1 fluorescence intensity on nerve fibers. Both automated analysis methods effectively distinguished TRPV1 signals on nerve fibers from those in keratinocytes, demonstrating high reliability as evidenced by excellent intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) values exceeding 0.75. This method holds the potential to uncover alterations in TRPV1 associated with neuropathic pain conditions, using a minimally invasive approach.

Neuropathic pain - A clinical primer

Neuropathic pain is used both as a mechanistic descriptor and a classification category of pain caused by a lesion or disease of the somatosensory nervous system and encompasses a vast array of possible diagnoses. The identification of neuropathic pain and diagnosis of specific syndromes relies on a detailed patient history. Standardized pain questionnaires can capture the patient`s symptoms, while the anatomical distribution of pain is often documented using pain drawings. Following this, a thorough clinical neurological examination is conducted to identify distinct sensory abnormalities, specifically sensory deficits and signs of increased sensitivity such as allodynia and hyperalgesia, within the pain-affected areas. Regardless of whether the lesion or disease is in the peripheral or central somatosensory nervous system, the presence of clinically overt sensory abnormalities is a key feature, distinguishing neuropathic pain from other types of pain, such as nociceptive pain, which likely coexist in neurological disorders. Extensive sensory deficits, as seen in certain stroke syndromes or following spinal cord injuries, may increase the likelihood of concomitant non-neuropathic pain within the same area of sensory loss. For this reason, differential diagnosis is essential when assessing patients with suspected neuropathic pain. Further diagnostic tests, including imaging or specific neurophysiological methods that assess nociceptive pathways, can provide objective evidence of a lesion or disease within the somatosensory nervous system. However, the causality between the lesion and the presence of neuropathic pain cannot be established definitively and always requires clinical judgment and interpretation within the broader context of the neurological disorder.

The relationship between pain duration characteristics and pain intensity in herpes zoster-related pain: a single-center retrospective study

Background

The varicella-zoster virus (VZV) can cause herpes zoster (HZ), which may progress to postherpetic neuralgia (PHN), leading to severe inflammatory responses and pain.

Objective

This study investigates the relationship between pain duration characteristics and pain intensity in patients with herpes zoster-related pain, hypothesizing that persistent pain correlates with higher pain intensity compared to intermittent pain.

Methods

A retrospective study was conducted at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, China. Data from patients treated for herpes zoster-related pain between January 2019 and February 2024 were analyzed. Pain intensity was measured using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS-11), and pain duration was categorized as intermittent or persistent. Multivariate regression models were used to assess the association between pain duration and intensity, adjusting for potential confounders.

Results

A total of 840 patients were included. Persistent pain was significantly associated with higher NRS-11 scores compared to intermittent pain (β = 0.71, 95% CI 0.50-0.91, p < 0.001). Subgroup analyses showed that persistent pain was associated with higher pain intensity in both acute HZ and PHN patients (HZ: β = 0.71, 95% CI 0.45-0.96, p < 0.001; PHN: β = 0.76, 95% CI 0.40-1.13, p < 0.001). Inflammatory markers, such as C-reactive protein (CRP) and white blood cell count, were positively correlated with pain intensity.

Conclusion

Pain duration significantly impacts pain intensity in HZ patients. Considering pain duration is crucial for effective pain management. Further research should explore the mechanisms underlying persistent pain to develop better treatment strategies.

Clinical neurophysiology of neuropathic pain

Timely and accurate diagnosis of neuropathic pain is critical for optimizing therapeutic outcomes and minimizing treatment delays. According to current standards, the diagnosis of definite neuropathic pain requires objective confirmation of a lesion or disease affecting the somatosensory nervous system. This can be provided by specialized neurophysiological techniques as conventional methods like nerve conduction studies and somatosensory evoked potentials may not be sufficient as they do not assess pain pathways. These specialized techniques apply various stimuli, such as thermal, electrical, or mechanical, alongside assessments of spinal/cortical potential or electromyographic reflex recordings. The selection of techniques is guided by the patient's clinical history and examination. The most common neurophysiological tests used in clinical practice are pain-related evoked potentials (PREPs) providing an objective evaluation of nociceptive pathways. Four types of PREPs are employed: laser evoked potentials, contact-heat evoked potentials, intra-epidermal electrical stimulation evoked potentials, and pinprick evoked potentials, with the two former ones being the most robust and reliable ones. These techniques investigate small-diameter fibers, primarily Aδ-fibers, and spinothalamic tracts allowing the identification of peripheral or central nervous system lesions. Yet, they are limited in capturing neuronal mechanisms underlying neuropathic pain or in providing objective quantification of pain sensation. Two neurophysiological measures which investigate the pain system beyond its integrity are the nociceptive withdrawal reflex and the N13 component of somatosensory evoked potentials. Both of these methods are more commonly used in research than clinical practice, but they pose interesting approaches to quantify central sensitization, a key underlying mechanism of neuropathic pain. Future investigations in neuropathic pain are therefore warranted.

Regional and interregional functional and structural brain abnormalities in neuropathic pain

Neuropathic pain is a severe form of chronic pain due to a lesion or disease of the somatosensory nervous system. Here we provide an overview of the neuroimaging approaches that can be used to assess brain abnormalities in a chronic pain condition, with particular focus on people with neuropathic pain and then summarize the findings of studies that applied these methodologies to study neuropathic pain. First, we review the most commonly used approaches to examine grey and white matter abnormalities using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and then review functional neuroimaging techniques to measure regional activity and inter-regional communication using functional MRI, electroencephalography (EEG) and magnetoencephalography (MEG). In neuropathic pain the most prominent structural abnormalities have been found to be in the primary somatosensory cortex, insula, anterior cingulate cortex and thalamus, with differences in volume directionality linked to neuropathic pain symptomology. Functional connectivity findings related to treatment outcome point to a potential clinical utility. Some prominent abnormalities in neuropathic pain identified with EEG and MEG throughout the dynamic pain connectome are slowing of alpha activity and higher regional oscillatory activity in the theta and alpha band, lower low beta and higher high beta band power. Finally, connectivity and coupling findings placed into context how regional abnormalities impact the networks and pathways of the dynamic pain connectome. Overall, functional and structural neuroimaging have the potential to identify predictive biomarkers that can be used to guide development of personalized pain management of neuropathic pain.

European Academy of Neurology: First 10 years

The European Academy of Neurology (EAN) was founded in May 2014 as the scientific society of all neurologists and all national neurological societies in Europe. The creation of EAN was based on the conscious decision of two predecessor societies (the European Federation of Neurological Societies and the European Neurological Society) to have a unique society for this continent with its 53 countries according to the World Health Organization and with the EU as the most important continental political decision level. In this report, the important milestones and the motivations of the decision-makers during the first 10 years are described. The development of the annual congress, the broad educational agenda, and the scientific groundwork including the European guidelines for the practise of neurology are described. Collaboration with and work for the national neurological societies is an important task for EAN. The political representation of neurology in Brussels and collaboration with the scientific societies of neighbouring medical disciplines and patient organizations are other major tasks on the agenda of the organization. EAN's goal is to reduce the burden of neurological diseases and to be the "home of neurology" in Europe for physicians, patients, and society. EAN communicates and interacts with its members, patients, partners, politicians, and the public through different channels. EAN is the owner of the scientifically independent European Journal of Neurology. EAN is based in Vienna, where its head office is located, but is also strongly represented in Brussels.

Rate-Dependent Depression of the Hoffmann Reflex: Practical Applications in Painful Diabetic Neuropathy

Measurement of the rate-dependent depression (RDD) of the Hoffmann (H) reflex, a technique developed over half a century ago, is founded on repeated stimulation of the H-reflex with tracking of sequentially evoked H-wave amplitudes in the resulting electromyogram. RDD offers insight into the integrity of spinal reflex pathways and spinal inhibitory regulation. Initially, RDD was predominantly utilized in the mechanistic exploration and evaluation of movement disorders characterized by spasticity symptoms, as may occur following spinal cord injury. However, there is increasing recognition that sensory input from the periphery is modified at the spinal level before ascending to the higher central nervous system and that some pain states can arise from, or be exaggerated by, disruption of spinal processing via a mechanism termed spinal disinhibition. This, along with the urgent clinical need to identify biological markers of pain generator and/or amplifier sites to facilitate targeted pain therapies, has prompted interest in RDD as a biomarker for the contribution of spinal disinhibition to neuropathic pain states. Current research in animals and humans with diabetes has revealed specific disorders of spinal GABAergic function associated with impaired RDD. Future investigations on RDD aim to further elucidate its underlying pathways and enhance its clinical applications.

Small fiber neuropathy

Small fiber neuropathy (SFN) is a condition involving the small nerve fibers of the peripheral nervous system, specifically the thinly myelinated Aδ and unmyelinated C fibers. It is an increasingly acknowledged condition within the spectrum of neuropathic pain disorders, leading to a rise in diagnosed patients. SFN is characterized by neuropathic pain, that is often described as burning, and typically presents in the hands and feet ascending proximally. Since small nerve fibers are involved in the autonomic nervous system, SFN can also lead to autonomic dysfunction. In the clinical setting, SFN diagnosis is frequently based on the Besta Criteria, which include skin biopsy and quantitative sensory testing. For clinical trials, the ACTTION criteria are also recommended. However, the diagnostic process is often complex, prompting research towards more accessible diagnostic methods. The pathophysiology of SFN remains unclear, thereby challenging therapeutic strategies. A large variety of underlying conditions has been associated with SFN, including metabolic, immune-mediated, infectious, toxic and hereditary conditions. The discovery of genetic sodium channelopathies in SFN provides insight into its underlying mechanisms. Newly discovered mutations within these genes reveal that SFN often shows overlapping clinical presentations with other sodium channelopathies. This chapter provides an in-depth look at SFN, including its clinical features, diagnostic methods, underlying conditions and possible therapeutic strategies.

Serum neurofilament light chain levels correlate with small fiber related parameters in patients with hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis with polyneuropathy (ATTRv-PN)

BACKGROUND

Recent evidence suggests that both serum neurofilament light chain (sNfL) levels and small fiber related diagnostic variables may be valuable disease biomarkers of hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis with polyneuropathy (ATTRv-PN). Our study aimed to explore the relations between sNfL and small fiber related skin biopsy and quantitative sensory testing (QST) parameters in a cohort of ATTRv-PN patients and pre-symptomatic carriers.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed data from 13 ATTRv patients and 21 pre-symptomatic carriers who underwent sNfL dosage, skin biopsy, and QST, and analyzed correlations between sNFL, intraepidermal nerve fiber density (IENFD), and cold (CDT) and warm detection thresholds (WDT).

RESULTS

Both sNfL and small fiber related parameters significantly differed between carriers and patients (sNfL: p < 0.0001; IENFD: p = 0.0008; CDT, WDT: < 0.0001). sNFL levels were normal in all carriers, altered in 85% of patients, negatively correlated with distal IENFD (r = -0.47, p = 0.005), and significantly correlated with CDT (r = -0.68; p < 0.0001) and WDT (r = 0.57; p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study showed that sNfL reliably discriminates symptomatic ATTRv-PN patients from pre-symptomatic carriers, and found significant relations between sNfL, skin biopsy, and QST small fiber related parameters, suggesting that sNfL might be a valuable biomarker of peripheral nerve involvement in ATTRv-PN and a supportive criterion for symptomatic disease transition.

Neuropathic pain, antidepressant drugs, and inflammation: a narrative review

BACKGROUND

Neuropathic pain (NP) is a chronic and disabling condition, caused by a lesion or disease of the somatosensory nervous system, characterized by a systemic inflammatory state. Signs and associated symptoms are rarely recognized, and response to usual analgesic drugs is poor. Antidepressant drugs are first-line agents for the treatment of NP. This narrative review aims to summarize the role of antidepressant drugs in treating NP and their mechanism of action, focusing on the effects on inflammatory cytokines.

MAIN TEXT

Peripheral nerve injury leads to a local inflammatory response and to the disruption of the blood-medullary barrier, allowing the influx of peripheral immune cells into the central nervous system. Antidepressants have antinociceptive effects because they recruit long-term neuronal plasticity. Amitriptyline modulates the inflammatory response due to the reduction of the mRNA of pro-inflammatory cytokines acting as an adenosine agonist and leading to the activation of the A3AR receptor. Through toll-like receptors, local inflammation determines the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) that drives and stimulates the hyperflammation in NP. Nortriptyline has an important antiallodynic effect in NP as it determines the recruitment of norepinephrine in the dorsal root ganglia. By modulating the β2-adrenoreceptors expressed by non-neuronal satellite cells, it inhibits the local production of TNF-α and determines a reduction of NP symptoms. Following the administration of antidepressants, there is a reduction in the production of TNF-α in the brain which in turn transforms the function of the α2-adrenergic receptor from an inhibitor to an activator of the release of norepinephrine. This is important to prevent the development of chronic pain.

CONCLUSION

Inflammatory cytokines are the main players in a bidirectional communication between the central and peripheral nervous system and the immune system in NP. Antidepressants have an important role in NP. Further research should explore the interaction between neuroinflammation in NP, the effects of antidepressants and the clinical relevance of this interaction.

Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy: Emerging Treatments of Neuropathic Pain and Novel Diagnostic Methods

BACKGROUND

Diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) is a prevalent and debilitating complication of diabetes, often leading to severe neuropathic pain. Although other diabetes-related complications have witnessed a surge of emerging treatments in recent years, DPN has seen minimal progression. This stagnation stems from various factors, including insensitive diagnostic methods and inadequate treatment options for neuropathic pain.

METHODS

In this comprehensive review, we highlight promising novel diagnostic techniques for assessing DPN, elucidating their development, strengths, and limitations, and assessing their potential as future reliable clinical biomarkers and endpoints. In addition, we delve into the most promising emerging pharmacological and mechanistic treatments for managing neuropathic pain, an area currently characterized by inadequate pain relief and a notable burden of side effects.

RESULTS

Skin biopsies, corneal confocal microscopy, transcutaneous electrical stimulation, blood-derived biomarkers, and multi-omics emerge as some of the most promising new techniques, while low-dose naltrexone, selective sodium-channel blockers, calcitonin gene-related peptide antibodies, and angiotensin type 2 receptor antagonists emerge as some of the most promising new drug candidates.

CONCLUSION

Our review concludes that although several promising diagnostic modalities and emerging treatments exist, an ongoing need persists for the further development of sensitive diagnostic tools and mechanism-based, personalized treatment approaches.

Posttraumatic headache: pain related evoked potentials (PREP) and conditioned pain modulation (CPM) to assess the pain modulatory function

Posttraumatic headache (PTH) is common following traumatic brain injury and impacts quality of life. We investigated descending pain modulation as one possible mechanism for PTH and correlated it to clinical measures. Pain-related evoked potentials (PREP) were recorded in 26 PTH-patients and 20 controls after electrical stimulation at the right hand and forehead with concentric surface electrodes. Conditioned pain modulation (CPM) was assessed using painful cutaneous electric stimulation (PCES) on the right hand as test stimulus and immersion of the left hand into 10 °C-cold water bath as conditioning stimulus based on changes in pain intensity and in amplitudes of PCES-evoked potentials. All participants completed questionnaires assessing depression, anxiety, and pain catastrophising. PTH-patients reported significantly higher pain ratings during PREP-recording in both areas despite similar stimulus intensity at pain threshold. N1P1-amplitudes during PREP and CPM-assessment were lower in patients in both areas, but statistically significant only on the hand. Both, PREP-N1-latencies and CPM-effects (based on the N1P1-amplitudes and pain ratings) were similar in both groups. Patients showed significantly higher ratings for anxiety and depression, which did not correlate with the CPM-effect. Our results indicate generalized hyperalgesia for electrical stimuli in both hand and face in PTH. The lacking correlation between pain ratings and EEG parameters indicates different mechanisms of pain perception and nociception.

The problem of residual pain in the assessment of rheumatoid arthritis activity

Residual pain is a major unmet medical need observed in patients suffering from rheumatoid arthritis (RA), which decreases their quality of life, even after achieving remission or low disease activity. The article has two aims: 1) to present mechanisms involved in the pathophysiology of residual pain, both inflammatory and non-inflammatory, i.e. neuropathic and nociplastic pain, as well as secondary pain syndromes, i.e. osteoarthritis and fibromyalgia, which can contribute to residual pain; 2) to show the limitations of current disease activity measures recommended by European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR) and American College of Rheumatology (ACR), which raise the need for a separate assessment of pain, and examples of methods that could be used by medical professionals to assess the pain and make a differential diagnosis. In conclusion, establishing a valid method to assess pain is essential to identify the pathomechanism of residual pain and to create treatments tailored specifically to individual RA patients.

Age and Sex Differences in Pediatric Neuropathic Pain and Complex Regional Pain Syndrome: A Scoping Review

BACKGROUND

Age and sex differences may exist in the frequency (incidence, prevalence) or symptoms of neuropathic pain (NP) and complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) due to biopsychosocial factors (eg, neurodevelopment, physiological and hormonal changes, psychosocial differences) that evolve through childhood and adolescence. Age and sex differences may have implications for evaluating screening and diagnostic tools and treatment interventions.

OBJECTIVE

To map the existing literature on pediatric NP and CRPS with respect to age and sex distributions, and age and sex differences in symptomology and frequency.

METHODS

A scoping literature review was conducted. Databases were searched from inception to January 2023. Data were collected on study design, setting, demographics, and age and sex differences in frequency and symptoms.

RESULTS

Eighty-seven studies were included. Distribution of participants with CRPS (n=37 studies) was predominantly early adolescence (10 to 14 y) and female sex, while NP (n=42 studies) was most commonly reported throughout adolescence (10 to 19 y) in both sexes. Forty-one studies examined age and sex differences in frequency; 6 studies reported higher frequency in adolescence. Very few studies (n=11) examined differences in symptomology.

DISCUSSION

Large epidemiological studies are required to further understand age and sex differences in frequency of pediatric NP and CRPS. Age and sex differences must be considered when evaluating screening and diagnostic tools and treatment interventions to ensure relevance and validity to both sexes and across ages. Validated tools will improve understanding of age-dependent and sex-dependent differences in symptoms, pathophysiology, and psychosocial impact of pediatric NP and CRPS.

Pathology of pain and its implications for therapeutic interventions

Pain is estimated to affect more than 20% of the global population, imposing incalculable health and economic burdens. Effective pain management is crucial for individuals suffering from pain. However, the current methods for pain assessment and treatment fall short of clinical needs. Benefiting from advances in neuroscience and biotechnology, the neuronal circuits and molecular mechanisms critically involved in pain modulation have been elucidated. These research achievements have incited progress in identifying new diagnostic and therapeutic targets. In this review, we first introduce fundamental knowledge about pain, setting the stage for the subsequent contents. The review next delves into the molecular mechanisms underlying pain disorders, including gene mutation, epigenetic modification, posttranslational modification, inflammasome, signaling pathways and microbiota. To better present a comprehensive view of pain research, two prominent issues, sexual dimorphism and pain comorbidities, are discussed in detail based on current findings. The status quo of pain evaluation and manipulation is summarized. A series of improved and innovative pain management strategies, such as gene therapy, monoclonal antibody, brain-computer interface and microbial intervention, are making strides towards clinical application. We highlight existing limitations and future directions for enhancing the quality of preclinical and clinical research. Efforts to decipher the complexities of pain pathology will be instrumental in translating scientific discoveries into clinical practice, thereby improving pain management from bench to bedside.

An overview of diagnosis and assessment methods for neuropathic pain

Neuropathic pain, defined as pain arising as a consequence of a lesion or disease affecting the somatosensory nervous system, requires precise diagnostic assessment. Different diagnostic tools have been devised for the diagnosis of neuropathic pain. This review offers insights into the diagnostic accuracy of screening questionnaires and different tests that investigate the somatosensory nervous system, in patients with suspected neuropathic pain. Thus, it illustrates how these tools can aid clinicians in accurately diagnosing neuropathic pain.

Trigeminal neuralgia

Trigeminal neuralgia (TN) is a facial pain disorder characterized by intense and paroxysmal pain that profoundly affects quality of life and presents complex challenges in diagnosis and treatment. TN can be categorized as classical, secondary and idiopathic. Epidemiological studies show variable incidence rates and an increased prevalence in women and in the elderly, with familial cases suggesting genetic factors. The pathophysiology of TN is multifactorial and involves genetic predisposition, anatomical changes, and neurophysiological factors, leading to hyperexcitable neuronal states, central sensitization and widespread neural plasticity changes. Neurovascular compression of the trigeminal root, which undergoes major morphological changes, and focal demyelination of primary trigeminal afferents are key aetiological factors in TN. Structural and functional brain imaging studies in patients with TN demonstrated abnormalities in brain regions responsible for pain modulation and emotional processing of pain. Treatment of TN involves a multifaceted approach that considers patient-specific factors, including the type of TN, with initial pharmacotherapy followed by surgical options if necessary. First-line pharmacological treatments include carbamazepine and oxcarbazepine. Surgical interventions, including microvascular decompression and percutaneous neuroablative procedures, can be considered at an early stage if pharmacotherapy is not sufficient for pain control or has intolerable adverse effects or contraindications.

YAP Ultralate Laser-Evoked Responses in Fibromyalgia: A Pilot Study in Patients with Small Fiber Pathology

Background: The investigation of C-fiber-evoked ultralow-level responses (ULEPs) at somatic sites is difficult in clinical practice but may be useful in patients with small fiber neuropathy. Aim: The aim of the study was to investigate changes in LEPs and ULEPs in patients with fibromyalgia affected or not by abnormal intraepidermal innervation. Methods: We recorded LEPs and ULEPs of the hand, thigh and foot in 13 FM patients with a normal skin biopsy (NFM), 13 patients with a reduced intraepidermal nerve fiber density (IENFD) (AFM) and 13 age-matched controls. We used a YAP laser, changing the energy and spot size at the pain threshold for LEPs and at the heat threshold for ULEPs. Results: ULEPs occurred at a small number of sites in both the NFM and AFM groups compared to control subjects. The absence of ULEPs during foot stimulation was characteristic of AFM patients. The amplitude of LEPs and ULEPs was reduced in patients with AFM at the three stimulation sites, and a slight reduction was also observed in the NFM group. Conclusions: The present preliminary results confirmed the reliability of LEPs in detecting small fiber impairments. The complete absence of ULEPs in the upper and lower limbs, including the distal areas, could confirm the results of LEPs in patients with small fiber impairments. Further prospective studies in larger case series could confirm the present findings on the sensitivity of LEP amplitude and ULEP imaging in detecting small fiber impairments and the development of IENFD in FM patients.

[The EAN-NeuPSIG guideline on the diagnosis of neuropathic pain-a summary]

In this joint guideline of the scientific societies and working groups mentioned in the title, evidence-based recommendations for the use of screening questionnaires and diagnostic tests in patients with neuropathic pain were developed. The systematic literature search and meta-analysis yielded the following results: Of the screening questionnaires, Douleur Neuropathique en 4 Questions (DN4), I‑DN4 (self-administered DN4), and Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs (LANSS) received a strong recommendation, while S‑LANSS (self-administered LANSS) and PainDETECT received weak recommendations for their use in the diagnostic workup of patients with possible neuropathic pain. There was a strong recommendation for the use of skin biopsy and a weak recommendation for quantitative sensory testing and nociceptive evoked potentials. The role of confocal corneal microscopy is still unclear. Functional imaging and peripheral nerve blocks are helpful in elucidating the pathophysiology, but current literature does not support their use in diagnosing neuropathic pain. In selected cases, genetic testing in specialized centers may be considered.

Cognitive, behavioral, and psychological phenotypes in small fiber neuropathy: A case-control study

OBJECTIVE

Small fiber neuropathy (SFN) is a well-defined chronic painful condition causing severe individual and societal burden. While mood disorders have been described, cognitive and behavioral profiles of SFN patients has not been investigated.

METHODS

Thirty-four painful SFN patients underwent comprehensive cognitive, behavioral, psychological, quality of life (QoL), and personality assessment using validated questionnaires. As control samples, we enrolled 36 patients with painful peripheral neuropathy (PPN) of mixed etiology and 30 healthy controls (HC). Clinical measures of neuropathic pain, duration, frequency, and intensity of pain at the time of assessment were recorded. Between-group and correlation analyses were performed and corrected for multiple comparisons.

RESULTS

No differences in clinical measures were found between SFN and PPN, and all groups had similar cognitive profiles. SFN patients showed higher levels of anxiety and alexithymia (p < .005) compared to PPN and HC, considering also pain intensity. Maladaptive coping strategies characterized both patient groups, but only SFN revealed higher levels of acceptance of pain (p < .05). Pain intensity and neuropathic symptoms were associated with mood, low QoL and catastrophism (p < .001), particularly, the higher the perceived pain intensity, the higher the use of maladaptive coping strategies (p < .001). The personality assessment revealed significant feelings of worthlessness and somatization traits both in SFN and PPN (p < .002 vs HC).

DISCUSSIONS

our results suggest that SFN patients had a normal-like cognitive profile, while their behavioral profile is characterized by mood disorders, alexithymia, maladaptive coping strategies, and poor QoL, as other chronic pain conditions, possibly related to pain intensity. Personality assessment suggests that somatization and feelings of worthlessness, which may worsen the neuropsychological profile, deserve clinical attention when considering patients' therapeutic approaches. At the same time, the high level of acceptance of pain is promising for therapeutic approaches based on psychological support.

Small and large fiber neuropathy in adults with myotonic dystrophy type 1

Introduction

Myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1) is an inherited neuromuscular disorder that affects multiple organs. In this study, we investigated symptoms of pain and presence of small and large fiber neuropathy in the juvenile and adult form of DM1.

Method

Twenty genetically verified DM1 patients were included. Pain was assessed, and neurological examination and investigations of the peripheral nervous system by quantification of small nerve fibers in skin biopsy, quantitative sensory testing and nerve conduction studies were performed. Results from skin biopsies were compared to healthy controls.

Result

Seventeen patients reported chronic pain. Large and/or small fiber abnormalities were present in 50% of the patients. The intraepidermal nerve fiber density was significantly lower in the whole group of patients compared to healthy controls.

Conclusion

Small-fiber neuropathy might be an important cause of pain in DM1.

Earlier diagnosis of peripheral neuropathy in primary care: A call to action

Peripheral neuropathy (PN) often remains undiagnosed (~80%). Earlier diagnosis of PN may reduce morbidity and enable earlier risk factor reduction to limit disease progression. Diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) is the most common PN and the 10 g monofilament is endorsed as an inexpensive and easily performed test for DPN. However, it only detects patients with advanced neuropathy at high risk of foot ulceration. There are many validated questionnaires to diagnose PN, but they can be time-consuming and have complex scoring systems. Primary care physicians (PCPs) have busy clinics and lack access to a readily available screening method to diagnose PN. They would prefer a short, simple, and accurate tool to screen for PN. Involving the patient in the screening process would not only reduce the time a physician requires to make a diagnosis but would also empower the patient. Following an expert meeting of diabetologists and neurologists from the Middle East, South East Asia and Latin America, a consensus was formulated to help improve the diagnosis of PN in primary care using a simple tool for patients to screen themselves for PN followed by a consultation with the physician to confirm the diagnosis.

Reliability of PainDETECT for Evaluating Low Back Pain Caused by Cluneal Nerve Entrapment

BACKGROUND

Superior/middle cluneal nerve entrapment (CN-E) is an elicitor of low back pain (LBP). The painDETECT questionnaire is used to characterize CN-E symptoms.

METHODS

Nineteen consecutive patients with LBP caused by CN-E (superior CN-E = 7; middle CN-E = 12) participated in a Japanese language painDETECT questionnaire survey before surgery. A score of 12 or lower was recorded as 'neuropathic component unlikely', a score of 19 or higher as 'neuropathic pain likely', and scores between 13 and 18 as 'neuropathic pain possible'. LBP severity was recorded on a numerical rating scale, the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire, and the EuroQol-5 dimension-5 level.

RESULTS

The mean painDETECT score was 11.8 and did not significantly differ between the superior CN-E and middle CN-E groups. We classified low back pain as unlikely to have a neuropathic component in 13 patients, as likely to have a neuropathic component in 2 patients, and as possibly neuropathic in 4 patients. There was no significant difference in the pain level of patients with scores of ≤12 and ≥13 on painDETECT. All patients reported trigger pain; the positive rate was high for electric shock pain, radiating pain, and pain attacks and low for a burning or tingling sensation, pain elicited by a light touch, and pain caused by cold or hot stimulation.

CONCLUSION

The painDETECT questionnaire may not reliably identify LBP caused by superior/middle CN-E as neuropathic pain. A diagnosis of LBP due to CN-E must be made carefully because symptoms resemble nociceptive pain.

Central neuropathic pain

Central neuropathic pain arises from a lesion or disease of the central somatosensory nervous system such as brain injury, spinal cord injury, stroke, multiple sclerosis or related neuroinflammatory conditions. The incidence of central neuropathic pain differs based on its underlying cause. Individuals with spinal cord injury are at the highest risk; however, central post-stroke pain is the most prevalent form of central neuropathic pain worldwide. The mechanisms that underlie central neuropathic pain are not fully understood, but the pathophysiology likely involves intricate interactions and maladaptive plasticity within spinal circuits and brain circuits associated with nociception and antinociception coupled with neuronal hyperexcitability. Modulation of neuronal activity, neuron-glia and neuro-immune interactions and targeting pain-related alterations in brain connectivity, represent potential therapeutic approaches. Current evidence-based pharmacological treatments include antidepressants and gabapentinoids as first-line options. Non-pharmacological pain management options include self-management strategies, exercise and neuromodulation. A comprehensive pain history and clinical examination form the foundation of central neuropathic pain classification, identification of potential risk factors and stratification of patients for clinical trials. Advanced neurophysiological and neuroimaging techniques hold promise to improve the understanding of mechanisms that underlie central neuropathic pain and as predictive biomarkers of treatment outcome.

The Impact of Relapses on Pain and Quality of Life in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis Treated with Corticosteroids

BACKGROUND

We assessed the prevalence and risks associated with pain during and after a multiple sclerosis (MS) relapse, and the impact of pain on quality of life (QoL), in MS patients.

METHODS

117 patients suffering an acute MS relapse were evaluated with clinician- and patient-reported outcomes, including the expanded disability status scale (EDSS), Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS-29), and MS Walking scale-12 (MSWS-12). Relapse-related pain was assessed via the short-form 36 (SF-36) questionnaire upon first visit (relapse onset) and at 6 weeks after treatment with intravenous methylprednisolone (follow-up visit).

RESULTS

Pain was present in 80% of patients at relapse onset. Patients with pain were more impaired physically (higher mean scores on MSIS-29phys and MSWS-12 and lower mean scores on SF-36 role physical, physical, and vitality scales) at relapse and six weeks after. In total, 74% of patients with MS relapse reported a poorer QoL due to pain. A lower psychological well-being was correlated with greater pain (MSIS29psy score). An increased number of prior relapses was a predictor of more pain at relapse onset.

CONCLUSIONS

Pain was common at the time of MS relapse and improved, but was still significant, six weeks after treatment with corticosteroids. Further studies are required to better understand relapse-related pain.

Efficacy of Pregabalin and Duloxetine in Patients with Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy (PDPN): A Multi-Centre Phase IV Clinical Trial-BLOSSOM

INTRODUCTION

Our trial (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04246619) evaluates the efficacy of two generic medications, pregabalin and duloxetine, for treating pain in PDPN patients.

METHODS

The patients were randomised either into the pregabalin (99) or the duloxetine (102) arm. Pain was evaluated using the DN-4 questionnaire, and visual analogue scales (VASs, 0-100 mm) were used to measure the average pain intensity (API), worst pain intensity (WPI) in the last 24 h and current pain intensity (CPI).

RESULTS

The proportion of patients with a clinically significant improvement in the API at Week 12 was 88.3% [CI 81.7%, 94.8%] in the pregabalin arm and 86.9% [CI 76.7%, 97.1%] in the duloxetine arm. After 12 weeks, the CPI, API, and WPI decreased by -35.3 [-40.5, -30.0], -37.0 [-41.4, -32.6], and -41.6 [-46.6, -36.5] in the pregabalin arm, and by -35.0 [-39.2, -30.7], -36.9 [-41.5, -32.3], and -40.0 [-44.8, -35.2] in the duloxetine arm (all in mm, all p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Our results demonstrate that pregabalin and duloxetine are effective medications for treating pain in PDPN in more than 86% of all randomised patients.