Fifth Åland Island conference on von Willebrand disease

Phage display broadly identifies inhibitor-reactive regions in von Willebrand factor

BACKGROUND

Correction of von Willebrand factor (VWF) deficiency with replacement products containing VWF can lead to the development of anti-VWF alloantibodies (i.e., VWF inhibitors) in patients with severe von Willebrand disease (VWD).

OBJECTIVE

Locate inhibitor-reactive regions within VWF using phage display.

METHODS

We screened a phage library displaying random, overlapping fragments covering the full-length VWF protein sequence for binding to a commercial anti-VWF antibody or to immunoglobulins from three type 3 VWD patients who developed VWF inhibitors in response to treatment with plasma-derived VWF. Immunoreactive phage clones were identified and quantified by next-generation DNA sequencing (NGS).

RESULTS

Next-generation DNA sequencing markedly increased the number of phages analyzed for locating immunoreactive regions within VWF following a single round of selection and identified regions not recognized in previous reports using standard phage display methods. Extending this approach to characterize VWF inhibitors from three type 3 VWD patients (including two siblings homozygous for the same VWF gene deletion) revealed patterns of immunoreactivity distinct from the commercial antibody and between unrelated patients, though with notable areas of overlap. Alloantibody reactivity against the VWF propeptide is consistent with incomplete removal of the propeptide from plasma-derived VWF replacement products.

CONCLUSION

These results demonstrate the utility of phage display and NGS to characterize diverse anti-VWF antibody reactivities.

Type 2A and 2M von Willebrand Disease: Differences in Phenotypic Parameters According to the Affected Domain by Disease-Causing Variants and Assessment of Pathophysiological Mechanisms

Type 2A and 2M von Willebrand disease (VWD) broadly show similar phenotypic parameters, but involve different pathophysiological mechanisms. This report presents the clinical and laboratory profiles of type 2A and type 2M patients genotypically diagnosed at one large center. Higher bleeding score values and a higher incidence of major bleeding episodes were observed in type 2A compared with type 2M, potentially reflective of the absence of large and intermediate von Willebrand factor (VWF) multimers in 2A. In type 2A, most of disease-causing variants (DCVs) appeared to be responsible for increased VWF clearance and DCV clustered in the VWF-A1 domain resulted in more severe clinical profiles. In type 2M, DCV in the VWF-A1 domain showed different laboratory patterns, related to either reduced synthesis or shortened VWF survival, and DCV in the VWF-A2 domain showed patterns related mainly to shortened survival. VWF-type 1 collagen binding/Ag (C1B/Ag) showed different patterns according to DCV location: in type 2A VWD, C1B/Ag was much lower when DCVs were located in the VWF-A2 domain. In type 2M with DCV in the VWF-A1domain, C1B/Ag was normal, but with DCV in the VWF-A2 domain, C1B/Ag was low. The higher frequency of major bleeding in VWD 2M patients with DCV in the VWF-A2 domain than that with DCV in the VWF-A1 domain could be a summative effect of abnormal C1B/Ag, on top of the reduced VWF-GPIb binding. In silico modeling suggests that DCV impairing the VWF-A2 domain somehow modulates collagen binding to the VWF-A3 domain. Concomitant normal FVIII:C/Ag and VWFpp/Ag, mainly in type 2M VWD, suggest that other nonidentified pathophysiological mechanisms, neither related to synthesis/retention nor survival of VWF, would be responsible for the presenting phenotype.

Updated overview on von Willebrand disease: focus on the interest of genotyping

Introduction: Von Willebrand disease (VWD) is the most common inherited bleeding disorder, characterized by a quantitative or qualitative defect of von Willebrand factor (VWF), a multimeric glycoprotein crucial for primary hemostasis and coagulation. VWD pathophysiology is heterogeneous as it includes several types and subtypes which therapeutic management is different. The mainstays of VWD treatment are desmopressin and replacement therapy based on both plasma-derived concentrates and a recently developed recombinant VWF. VWD definitive diagnosis is achieved by a battery of phenotypic biologic assays and genotyping is currently performed mostly for research.Areas covered: This narrative review will firstly present a general overview on VWD epidemiology, pathophysiology, classification, clinics, phenotypic biologic diagnosis, and treatment. Secondly, a focus on VWD genotyping will be presented with specific emphasis on the evolution of its technical aspects, its applications for research dedicated to a better understanding of VWD pathophysiology and epidemiology and its interest in both a faster diagnosis and an optimal treatment of VWD.Expert opinion: Based on analysis of the literature, it can be concluded that the fast evolution of genetic techniques together with the development of innovating treatments may significantly change diagnostic flow charts for VWD and their use for specific and personalized treatment.