Efficacy and tolerability of zolmitriptan nasal spray for the treatment of acute migraine in adolescents: Results of a randomized, double-blind, multi-center, parallel-group study (TEENZ)

Enhancing Acute Migraine Treatment: Exploring Solid Lipid Nanoparticles and Nanostructured Lipid Carriers for the Nose-to-Brain Route

Migraine has a high prevalence worldwide and is one of the main disabling neurological diseases in individuals under the age of 50. In general, treatment includes the use of oral analgesics or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) for mild attacks, and, for moderate or severe attacks, triptans or 5-HT1B/1D receptor agonists. However, the administration of antimigraine drugs in conventional oral pharmaceutical dosage forms is a challenge, since many molecules have difficulty crossing the blood-brain barrier (BBB) to reach the brain, which leads to bioavailability problems. Efforts have been made to find alternative delivery systems and/or routes for antimigraine drugs. In vivo studies have shown that it is possible to administer drugs directly into the brain via the intranasal (IN) or the nose-to-brain route, thus avoiding the need for the molecules to cross the BBB. In this field, the use of lipid nanoparticles, in particular solid lipid nanoparticles (SLN) and nanostructured lipid carriers (NLC), has shown promising results, since they have several advantages for drugs administered via the IN route, including increased absorption and reduced enzymatic degradation, improving bioavailability. Furthermore, SLN and NLC are capable of co-encapsulating drugs, promoting their simultaneous delivery to the site of therapeutic action, which can be a promising approach for the acute migraine treatment. This review highlights the potential of using SLN and NLC to improve the treatment of acute migraine via the nose-to-brain route. First sections describe the pathophysiology and the currently available pharmacological treatment for acute migraine, followed by an outline of the mechanisms underlying the nose-to-brain route. Afterwards, the main features of SLN and NLC and the most recent in vivo studies investigating the use of these nanoparticles for the treatment of acute migraine are presented.

International Headache Society global practice recommendations for the acute pharmacological treatment of migraine

BACKGROUND

In an effort to improve migraine management around the world, the International Headache Society (IHS) has here developed a list of practical recommendations for the acute pharmacological treatment of migraine. The recommendations are categorized into optimal and essential, in order to provide treatment options for all possible settings, including those with limited access to migraine medications.

METHODS

An IHS steering committee developed a list of clinical questions based on practical issues in the management of migraine. A selected group of international senior and junior headache experts developed the recommendations, following expert consensus and the review of available national and international headache guidelines and guidance documents. Following the initial search, a bibliography of twenty-one national and international guidelines was created and reviewed by the working group.

RESULTS

A total of seventeen questions addressing different aspects of acute migraine treatment have been outlined. For each of them we provide an optimal recommendation, to be used whenever possible, and an essential recommendation to be used when the optimal level cannot be attained.

CONCLUSION

Adoption of these international recommendations will improve the quality of acute migraine treatment around the world, even where pharmacological options remain limited.

Melatonin for migraine prevention in children and adolescents: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial after single-blind placebo lead-in

BACKGROUND

Melatonin is effective for migraine prevention in adults. We hypothesized that melatonin would also be effective for migraine prevention in children and adolescents.

METHODS

This was a randomized, double-blind trial of melatonin (3 mg or 6 mg) versus placebo for migraine prevention in 10-17 year-olds with 4-28/28 headache days at baseline. Participants were recruited from the UCSF Child & Adolescent Headache Program, UCSF child neurology clinic, and social media advertisements. Migraine diagnosis was confirmed by a headache specialist. Participants completed an 8-week single-blind placebo run-in. Those meeting randomization criteria (≥4 headache days and ≥23/28 electronic diary entries during weeks 5-8) were randomized 1:1:1 to placebo:melatonin 3 mg:melatonin 6 mg nightly for 8 weeks. The primary outcome measure was migraine days in weeks 5-8 of randomized treatment between melatonin (combined 6 mg + 3 mg) versus placebo. We aimed to enroll n = 210.

RESULTS

The study closed early due to slow enrollment (n = 72). Two participants were in the single-blind phase when the study closed, therefore the meaningful n = 70. Sixteen percent (11/70) were lost to follow-up during the single-blind phase. An additional 21% (15/70) did not meet randomization criteria (<4 headache days: n = 5, <23/28 diary days: n = 7, both: n = 3). Sixty-three percent (44/70) were eligible to randomize, of whom 42 randomized (n = 14 per arm). Taking another preventive at enrollment (OR 8.3, 95% CI 1.01 to 68.9) was the only variable associated with meeting randomization criteria. Of those randomized, 91% (38/42) provided diary data in the final 4-weeks. However, given the amount of missing data, only those with ≥21/28 diary days were analyzed-7/14 (50%) in the placebo group, and 20/28 (71%) in the melatonin groups combined. Median (IQR) migraine/migrainous days in weeks 5-8 of double-blind treatment was 2 (1-7) in the placebo group versus 2 (1-12) in the melatonin groups combined; the difference in medians (95% CI for the difference) was 0 days (-9 to 3). There were no differences in adverse events between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

When compared to recall at enrollment, headache days decreased across the single-blind placebo phase and the double-blind phase. There was no suggestion of superiority of melatonin; however, given the substantial portion of missing data, numerically higher in the placebo arm, and underpowering, this should not be interpreted as proof of inefficacy. Melatonin was generally well tolerated with no serious adverse events. Future migraine preventive trials in this age group may find this trial helpful for anticipating enrollment needs if using a single-blind placebo run-in. Enriching for those already on a migraine preventive may improve randomization rates in future trials, though would change the generalizability of results.

The Efficacy of Different Triptans for the Treatment of Acute Headache in Pediatric Migraine: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Serotonin receptors 5-HT1B and 5-HT1D in the cerebral arteries are activated by the 5-hydroxytryptophan agonists (triptans) to relieve the discomfort associated with migraines. Even though triptans are often used to treat acute migraines, there is some debate over their effectiveness.

OBJECTIVE

Our systematic review aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of triptans for acute treatment of migraine in young individuals.

METHODS

Utilizing the databases of Google Scholar, Cochrane Library, and PubMed, a literature search was conducted, and all papers published till July 2022 were included. This systematic review was carried out following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) standards. In addition to the Boolean operators AND, OR, and NOT, the following descriptive terms were also used: "Triptans," "Pediatric Migraine," "Migraine disorders," "Headache," "Children," and "Adolescent."

RESULTS

A total of 1047 studies were identified, and 25 articles were finally included in the study. 17 of them were RCTs while the remaining were non-randomized trials. Most studies recruited participants aged between 12-17 years. Among 25 studies, 7 reported sumatriptan use, 3 assessed a combination of sumatriptan and naproxen, 4 were on almotriptan, 1 on eletriptan, 6 on rizatriptan, and 4 on zolmitriptan use.

CONCLUSION

We found that rizatriptan (good tolerability profile with a dose of 5 mg) and sumatriptan (nasal spray, 10 mg and 20 mg) had higher efficiency as compared to other triptans. Regardless of type or dose, all triptans are generally well tolerated by patients, but a few adverse effects such as light-headedness (sumatriptan), nasopharyngitis, and, muscular spasms (sumatriptan/ naproxen), somnolence, and dry mouth (rizatriptan), and dizziness (zolmitriptan group) were reported with the triptans.

Compritol-Based Nanostrucutured Lipid Carriers (NLCs) for Augmentation of Zolmitriptan Bioavailability via the Transdermal Route: In Vitro Optimization, Ex Vivo Permeation, In Vivo Pharmacokinetic Study

Migraine is a severe neurovascular disease manifested mainly as unilateral throbbing headaches. Triptans are agonists for serotonin receptors. Zolmitriptan (ZMP) is a biopharmaceutics classification system (BCS) class III medication with an absolute oral bioavailability of less than 40%. As a result, our research intended to increase ZMP bioavailability by developing transdermal nanostructured lipid carriers (NLCs). NLCs were prepared utilizing a combination of hot melt emulsification and high-speed stirring in a 3² full factorial design. The studied variables were liquid lipid type (X₁) and surfactant type (X₂). The developed NLCs were evaluated in terms of particle size (Y₁, nm), polydispersity index (Y₂, PDI), zeta potential (Y₃, mV), entrapment efficacy (Y₄, %) and amount released after 6 h (Q6h, Y₅, %). At 1% Mygliol as liquid lipid component and 1% Span 20 as surfactant, the optimized formula (NLC9) showed a minimum particle size (138 ± 7.07 nm), minimum polydispersity index (0.39 ± 0.001), acceptable zeta potential (−22.1 ± 0.80), maximum entrapment efficiency (73 ± 0.10%) and maximum amount released after 6 h (83.22 ± 0.10%). The optimized formula was then incorporated into gel preparation (HPMC) to improve the system stability and ease of application. Then, the pharmacokinetic study was conducted on rabbits in a cross-over design. The calculated parameters showed a higher area under the curve (AUC_0–24, AUC_0–∞ (ng·h/mL)) of the developed ZMP-NLCs loaded gel, with a 1.76-fold increase in bioavailability in comparison to the orally administered marketed product (Zomig^®). A histopathological examination revealed the safety of the developed nanoparticles. The declared results highlight the potential of utilizing the proposed NLCs for the transdermal delivery of ZMP to improve the drug bioavailability.

The Pharmacological Treatment of Pediatric Vertigo

Vertigo in children is a challenging topic. The lack of dedicated trials, guidelines and papers causes inhomogeneity in the treatment of vertigo in children. Meniere’s disease, migraine equivalents, vestibular neuritis, paroxysmal positional benign vertigo (BPPV), persistent postural-perceptual dizziness (PPPD) and motion sickness may affect children with various degrees of incidence and clinical severity compared to adults. Several drugs are proposed for the management of these conditions, even if their use is subordinated to the child’s age. In this review, we summarize the existing evidence related to the use of drugs for this clinical condition in children as a start point for new trials, stating the urgent need for international guidelines.

Comparison between metamizole and triptans for migraine treatment: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Objective The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the efficacy of metamizole and triptans for the treatment of migraine. MethodsRandomized controlled trials including people who received metamizole or triptan by multiple routes of administration and at all doses as treatment compared to subjects who received another treatment or placebo were included in the systematic review. The primary outcomes were freedom from pain at 2 hours; pain relief at 2 hours; sustained headache response at 24 hours; sustained freedom from pain at 24 hours. The statistical analysis of all interventions of interest were based on random effect models compared through a network meta-analysis. Results 209 studies meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria were analyzed. Of these, 130 had data that could be analyzed statistically. Only 3.0% provided enough information and were judged to have a low overall risk of bias for all categories evaluated; approximately 50% of the studies presented a low risk of selection bias. More than 75% of the studies presented a low risk of performance bias, and around 75% showed a low risk of detection and attrition bias. ConclusionThere is no evidence of a difference between dipyrone and any triptan for pain freedom after 2 hours of medication. Our study suggests that metamizole may be equally effective as triptans in acute migraine treatment.

Nasal Delivery of Acute Medications for Migraine: The Upper Versus Lower Nasal Space

The acute treatment of migraine requires effective drugs that are well tolerated and provide rapid and consistent pain relief. Oral tablets are the most commonly used acute treatment for migraine; however, their effectiveness is limited by the rate of gastrointestinal (GI) tract absorption and first-pass hepatic metabolism, and they may not be ideal for patients experiencing GI motility issues. Nasal delivery is an attractive alternative route as it may circumvent GI tract absorption, avoid first-pass metabolism in the liver, and potentially reduce the frequency of GI adverse events. The large surface area and high vascularity within the nose may permit rapid absorption of therapeutics into the systemic circulation, allowing for rapid onset of action. However, the site of drug deposition (upper versus lower nasal cavity) may influence drug pharmacokinetics. Most approved nasal migraine therapies target the lower nasal space where the epithelium is less permeable, and they may be quickly cleared away due to increased ciliary function or dripping from the nose or swallowing, resulting in variable absorption and limited bioavailability. Together with its abundant vascularization, relative mucosal thickness stability, and low clearance rates, the upper nasal space harnesses the benefits of nasal delivery to potentially maximize drug efficacy.

Drugs for Acute Attack of Pediatric Migraine: A Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Migraine in pediatric is a common neurological disease, and its prevalence is varying widely. The medication for the acute attack of pediatric migraine is various. we take advantage of network meta-analysis to address the efficacy and rank of these medications. Database including Pubmed and Cochrane Library were queried using a specific searching strategy. The quality of trials enrolled was assessed according to the Cochrane collaboration'tool for assessing risk of bias. The data analysis was conducted by using the core software for Cochrane reviews (Rev Man 5.3) and the Aggregate Data Drug Information System (Addis v1.16.8). The outcomes were pain-free and pain relief at 2 hours post-dose. Totally, twenty trials with high quality including 6029 migraineurs with 6912 attacks randomly assigned to 14 different drugs. The data of ketorolac and prochlorperazine were missing. We found that sumatriptan nasal spray and zolmitriptan nasal spray were superior to placebo in the two efficacy outcomes, whereas almotriptan, rizatriptan, sumatriptan with naproxen sodium, ibuprofen and ibuprofen suspension were superior to placebo only in one of the efficacy outcomes. And in network meta-analysis, we found the best 3 treatments were ibuprofen, sumatriptan with naproxen sodium and ibuprofen suspension in achieving pain-free. Meanwhile, the best 3 treatments were ibuprofen suspension, ibuprofen, and rizatriptan in achieving pain relief. In conclusion, in acute treatments of pediatric migraine, most triptans and NSAIDS were effective to achieve pain-free or pain-relief. And the most effective treatment to achieve pain-free is sumatriptan with naproxen sodium. Ibuprofen and ibuprofen suspension were the most effective treatments to achieve pain-relief.

Recent Advances and Novel Approaches for Nose to Brain Drug Delivery for Treatment of Migraine

Background:

Nasal drug delivery has been used since ancient times for therapeutic and recreational purposes. For the last decades, nasal drug delivery has been extended for drug delivery to the brain. Therefore, it is important to understand the several physiological and physicochemical factors of the nose for brain drug delivery.

Objective:

A major highlight of the present review article is the several aspects of the nose to brain delivery for migraine treatment. This review will help to understand different factors which are needed to be considered for intra-nasal formulations to achieve the desired therapeutic effects.

Method:

There are different drug delivery routes available for migraine treatment. Nasal route of administration may be optimal for migraine treatment which has better drug concentration in the brain. These approaches may be associated with limiting the adverse effects of drug therapeutics.

Results:

A list of total FDA approved approaches has been provided. Novel approaches used for drug targeting to get maximum drug concentration in the brain have been highlighted. Several novel drug delivery approaches such as nanoparticle, nanoemulsion, microspheres, etc. have been reported and better therapeutic effects have been observed. Among the novel approaches, some of them are currently under either Phase II or Phase III development but may prove to offer better clinical effects. These approaches would become the alternate choice for migraine treatment with patients experiencing symptoms consistent with gastrointestinal dysfunction associated with migraine.

Conclusion:

Intra-nasal administration of drugs for migraine treatment may offer an interesting alternative for achieving therapeutic effects of drugs which are comparable to the parenteral route. Nasal drug delivery can be an alternative route of drug administration for migraine treatment to achieve better bioavailability.

Practice guideline update summary: Acute treatment of migraine in children and adolescents

Objective

To provide evidence-based recommendations for the acute symptomatic treatment of children and adolescents with migraine.

Methods

We performed a systematic review of the literature and rated risk of bias of included studies according to the American Academy of Neurology classification of evidence criteria. A multidisciplinary panel developed practice recommendations, integrating findings from the systematic review and following an Institute of Medicine–compliant process to ensure transparency and patient engagement. Recommendations were supported by structured rationales, integrating evidence from the systematic review, related evidence, principles of care, and inferences from evidence.

Results

There is evidence to support the efficacy of the use of ibuprofen, acetaminophen (in children and adolescents), and triptans (mainly in adolescents) for the relief of migraine pain, although confidence in the evidence varies between agents. There is high confidence that adolescents receiving oral sumatriptan/naproxen and zolmitriptan nasal spray are more likely to be headache-free at 2 hours than those receiving placebo. No acute treatments were effective for migraine-related nausea or vomiting; some triptans were effective for migraine-related phonophobia and photophobia.

Recommendations

Recommendations for the treatment of acute migraine in children and adolescents focus on the importance of early treatment, choosing the route of administration best suited to the characteristics of the individual migraine attack, and providing counseling on lifestyle factors that can exacerbate migraine, including trigger avoidance and medication overuse.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of new acute treatments for migraine

INTRODUCTION

Recommended medications for the acute treatment of migraine encompass triptans, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and analgesics. While it is true that triptans have been the first successful mechanism-driven treatment in the field, recently, new targets involved in migraine pathogenesis have emerged and new drug classes have been studied for migraine attack therapy. Areas covered: Pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of the new acute treatments of migraine (i.e. ditans, gepants, and glutamate receptor antagonists), considering also marketed drugs in new formulations and administration routes. Expert opinion: Research on the administration routes of marketed drugs was performed in order to improve, in accordance with basic pharmacokinetics parameters, the speed of action of these medications. Similar to the triptans, the new acute treatments are migraine-specific medications, acting on the trigeminovascular system, albeit with different mechanisms. Although available data do not conclusively indicate the superiority of a class over the others, the pharmacodynamics explains the peculiar tolerability and safety profile of different drug classes emerging from clinical trials. Further studies are needed to investigate the possibility of combining different drug classes to optimize the clinical response and the potential role of the novel drugs in medication-overuse headache.

Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Zolmitriptan and Its Metabolite in Adults and Adolescents to Support Dose Selection in Children With Migraine

Zolmitriptan is a serotonin (5-HT) _1B/1D receptor agonist effective for the treatment of migraine. This analysis aimed to develop a population pharmacokinetic (PK) model for zolmitriptan and its active metabolite in adults and adolescents and provide appropriate dosing regimens to be used in clinical trials for children 6-11 years old. The data from a single-dose clinical study of 5.0-mg zolmitriptan nasal spray (ZNS) conducted in adult and adolescent patients with migraine between migraine attacks was applied. Similar plasma concentration profiles of zolmitriptan and its metabolite, 183C91, were observed in adults and adolescents. A 1-compartment model with first-order absorption and first-order elimination reasonably described the zolmitriptan PK. With a portion of elimination of zolmitriptan being treated as the conversion from zolmitriptan to 183C91, the disposition of 183C91 was described by a 1-compartment model with first-order elimination. The estimated typical apparent volume of distribution and clearance of zolmitriptan were 136 L and 121 L/h, respectively, with 56.5% and 42.6% between-subject variability, respectively. Based on the simulation results with the final population PK model, a body weight-based dosing scheme of 5.0 and 2.5 mg ZNS in children greater than and less than 50 kg is recommended to achieve exposures similar to those of the adult and adolescent population administered 5.0 mg ZNS. The recommended doses for children to achieve exposure similar to that observed in adults given 2.5 mg ZNS are 2.5 mg (≥50 kg) and 1.0 mg (15-50 kg). These dosing regimens could be used in future clinical trials.