1
|
García-Azorín D, García-Ruiz C, Sierra-Mencía Á, González-Osorio Y, Recio-García A, González-Celestino A, García-Iglesias C, Planchuelo-Gómez Á, Íñiguez AE, Guerrero-Peral ÁL. Acute and Preventive Treatment of COVID-19-Related Headache: A Series of 100 Patients. Life (Basel) 2024; 14:910. [PMID: 39063663 PMCID: PMC11277981 DOI: 10.3390/life14070910] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2024] [Revised: 07/15/2024] [Accepted: 07/17/2024] [Indexed: 07/28/2024] Open
Abstract
To describe the need and effectiveness of acute and preventive medications in a series of 100 consecutive patients referred due to COVID-19-related headaches. Patients were aged 48.0 (standard deviation (SD): 12.4), 84% were female, and 56% had a prior history of headache. The most common headache phenotype was holocranial (63%), frontal (48%), pressing (75%), of moderate intensity (7 out of 10), and accompanied by photophobia (58%). Acute medication was required by 93%, with paracetamol (46%) being the most frequently used drug, followed by ibuprofen (44%). The drugs with the highest proportion of a 2 h pain-freedom response were dexketoprofen (58.8%), triptans (57.7%), and ibuprofen (54.3%). Preventive treatment was required by 75% of patients. The most frequently used drugs were amitriptyline (66%), anesthetic blockades (18%), and onabotulinumtoxinA (11%). The drugs with the highest 50% responder rate were amitriptyline (45.5%), mirtazapine (50%), and anesthetic blockades (38.9%). The highest 75% responder rate was experienced following onabotulinumtoxinA (18.2%). In conclusion, most patients required acute medication, with triptans and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs achieving the best responses. Three-quarters of patients required preventive medication. The most frequently used drug was amitriptyline, which obtained the best results. In some treatment-resistant patients, anesthetic blockades and onabotulinumtoxinA were also beneficial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David García-Azorín
- Department of Medicine, Toxicology and Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Valladolid, 47002 Valladolid, Spain;
- Headache Unit, Department of Neurology, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid, 47003 Valladolid, Spain; (C.G.-R.); (Á.S.-M.); (Y.G.-O.); (A.R.-G.); (A.G.-C.); (C.G.-I.)
| | - Claudia García-Ruiz
- Headache Unit, Department of Neurology, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid, 47003 Valladolid, Spain; (C.G.-R.); (Á.S.-M.); (Y.G.-O.); (A.R.-G.); (A.G.-C.); (C.G.-I.)
| | - Álvaro Sierra-Mencía
- Headache Unit, Department of Neurology, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid, 47003 Valladolid, Spain; (C.G.-R.); (Á.S.-M.); (Y.G.-O.); (A.R.-G.); (A.G.-C.); (C.G.-I.)
| | - Yésica González-Osorio
- Headache Unit, Department of Neurology, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid, 47003 Valladolid, Spain; (C.G.-R.); (Á.S.-M.); (Y.G.-O.); (A.R.-G.); (A.G.-C.); (C.G.-I.)
| | - Andrea Recio-García
- Headache Unit, Department of Neurology, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid, 47003 Valladolid, Spain; (C.G.-R.); (Á.S.-M.); (Y.G.-O.); (A.R.-G.); (A.G.-C.); (C.G.-I.)
| | - Ana González-Celestino
- Headache Unit, Department of Neurology, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid, 47003 Valladolid, Spain; (C.G.-R.); (Á.S.-M.); (Y.G.-O.); (A.R.-G.); (A.G.-C.); (C.G.-I.)
| | - Cristina García-Iglesias
- Headache Unit, Department of Neurology, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid, 47003 Valladolid, Spain; (C.G.-R.); (Á.S.-M.); (Y.G.-O.); (A.R.-G.); (A.G.-C.); (C.G.-I.)
| | - Álvaro Planchuelo-Gómez
- Imaging Processing Laboratory, Escuela Superior de Telecomunicaciones (ETSI), Universidad de Valladolid, 47002 Valladolid, Spain;
| | | | - Ángel L. Guerrero-Peral
- Department of Medicine, Toxicology and Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Valladolid, 47002 Valladolid, Spain;
- Headache Unit, Department of Neurology, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid, 47003 Valladolid, Spain; (C.G.-R.); (Á.S.-M.); (Y.G.-O.); (A.R.-G.); (A.G.-C.); (C.G.-I.)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Garrido-Valdes M, Díaz-Velis L, Valdes-Gonzalez M, Garrido-Suárez BB, Garrido G. Gastroprotective Role of Fruit Extracts in Gastric Damage Induced by Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs: A Systematic Review. J Med Food 2023; 26:777-798. [PMID: 37902784 DOI: 10.1089/jmf.2023.0005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/31/2023] Open
Abstract
The aim of this study was to systematically review the scientific literature, with Preferred Reporting Items of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, of the articles found in the past 11 years on the gastroprotective role of fruit extracts in gastric ulcers induced by non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Scientific articles published between 2010 and 2020 were included in this systematic review, including in vitro and in vivo models, to define the gastroprotective role of fruit extracts. Studies were selected by Rayyan using PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Science Direct databases. The keywords for the search strategy were: "gastric injury," "gastric ulcer," "fruit," "indomethacin," and "aspirin." Twenty-two articles with animal models of gastric ulcers were included. The NSAIDs used were aspirin and indomethacin. To know the damage caused by these, the ulceration index and biomarkers, such as aggressive/defensive factors involved in the gastric ulceration process, were measured. Most studies have shown that fruit extracts have antiulcer activity, with the most abundant metabolites being flavonoids, followed by terpenes and alkaloids. Possible antiulcer activities such as antioxidant, cytoprotective, gastric acid antisecretory, anti-inflammatory, or angiogenesis stimulant were declared, manifested mainly as a reduction of lipid peroxidation products, an increase in antioxidant enzymes and prostaglandins, and by the formation of a protective film through protein precipitation in the ulcer area. This systematic review demonstrates the importance of fruit extracts as gastric protectors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mariana Garrido-Valdes
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Universidad Católica del Norte, Antofagasta, Chile
| | - Leonor Díaz-Velis
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Universidad Católica del Norte, Antofagasta, Chile
| | | | | | - Gabino Garrido
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Universidad Católica del Norte, Antofagasta, Chile
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Yang Q, Feng Z, Ding D, Kang C. CD3D and CD247 are the molecular targets of septic shock. Medicine (Baltimore) 2023; 102:e34295. [PMID: 37478215 PMCID: PMC10662883 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000034295] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2023] [Accepted: 06/21/2023] [Indexed: 07/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Septic shock is a serious systemic disease with circulatory failure and abnormal cell metabolism caused by sepsis. However, the relationship between CD3D and CD247 and septic shock remains unclear. The septic shock datasets GSE33118 and GSE142255 profiles were generated from the gene expression omnibus databases GPl570, GPl17586. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were screened and weighted gene co-expression network analysis was performed. The construction and analysis of protein-protein interaction (PPI) network, functional enrichment analysis, gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) were performed. Gene expression heat map was drawn. Immune infiltration analysis was performed. Comparative toxicogenomics database (CTD) analysis were performed to find the disease most related to the core gene. Targets can was used to screen miRNAs regulating the hub DEGs. 467 DEGs were identified. According to the gene ontology analysis, they were mainly enriched in the regulation of immune response, cell activation, signaling receptor activity, enzyme binding. Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes analysis showed that they were mainly enriched in the TCR signaling pathway, Fc epsilon RI signaling pathway. GSEA showed that the DEGs were mainly enriched in immune response regulation, cell activation, TCR signaling pathway, Fc epsilon RI signaling pathway. Positive regulation of Fc receptor signaling pathway, PID IL12 2 pathway, immune response was observed in go enrichment items in the enrichment items of metascape. PPI networks got 5 core genes. Gene expression heat map showed that 5 core genes (CD247, Lck, cd3e, cd3d, ITK) were lowly expressed in the sepsis shock samples and highly expressed in the normal samples. CTD analysis showed that 5 core genes (CD247, Lck, cd3e, cd3d, ITK) were found to be associated with hemorrhage and necrosis. Low expression of cd3d, CD247 was observed in septic shock, and the lower the level of cd3d, CD247, the worse the prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qian Yang
- Intensive Care Unit, Gastrointestinal Rehabilitation Center, Beijing Rehabilitation Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Zhijuan Feng
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Air Force Medical Center, Beijing, China
| | - Danyang Ding
- Gastrointestinal Rehabilitation Center, Beijing Rehabilitation Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Chunbo Kang
- Gastrointestinal Rehabilitation Center, Beijing Rehabilitation Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Luu B, Wijesinghe S, Kassem T, Lien J, Luu D, Wijesinghe R, Luu L, Kayingo G. Drugs in primary care that may alter COVID-19 risk and severity. JAAPA 2023; 36:28-33. [PMID: 37097779 DOI: 10.1097/01.jaa.0000918768.11544.e5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/26/2023]
Abstract
ABSTRACT This article describes drugs used in primary care that could alter patients' risk for and severity of COVID-19. The risks and benefits of each drug class were differentiated according to the strength of evidence from 58 selected randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses. Most of the studies reported on drugs affecting the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system. Other classes included opioids, acid suppressants, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, corticosteroids, vitamins, biguanides, and statins. Current evidence has not fully differentiated drugs that may increase risk versus benefits in COVID-19 infection. Further studies are needed in this area.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brent Luu
- Brent Luu is an associate clinical professor at the University of California Davis's Betty Irene Moore School of Nursing in Sacramento, Calif. Sampath Wijesinghe is a clinical assistant professor in the PA program at Stanford (Calif.) University. Tarek Kassem is an assistant professor at California Northstate University in Elk Grove, Calif. Justin Lien is a student at Western University's College of Osteopathic Medicine in Pomona, Calif. Darrick Luu is a student at California Northstate University College of Health Science in Rancho Cordova, Calif. Rynee Wijesinghe is a student at California State University in Fresno, Calif. Leianna Luu is a student at the University of California Riverside. Gerald Kayingo is assistant dean, executive director, and professor in the Physician Assistant Leadership and Learning Academy at the University of Maryland Baltimore. The authors have disclosed no potential conflicts of interest, financial or otherwise
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Caronna E, van den Hoek TC, Bolay H, Garcia-Azorin D, Gago-Veiga AB, Valeriani M, Takizawa T, Messlinger K, Shapiro RE, Goadsby PJ, Ashina M, Tassorelli C, Diener HC, Terwindt GM, Pozo-Rosich P. Headache attributed to SARS-CoV-2 infection, vaccination and the impact on primary headache disorders of the COVID-19 pandemic: A comprehensive review. Cephalalgia 2023; 43:3331024221131337. [PMID: 36606562 DOI: 10.1177/03331024221131337] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective is to summarize the knowledge on the epidemiology, pathophysiology and management of secondary headache attributed to SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination; as well as to delineate their impact on primary headache disorders. METHODS This is a narrative review of the literature regarding primary and secondary headache disorders in the setting of COVID-19 pandemic. We conducted a literature search in 2022 on PubMed, with the keywords "COVID 19" or "vaccine" and "headache" to assess the appropriateness of all published articles for their inclusion in the review. RESULTS Headache is a common and sometimes difficult-to-treat symptom of both the acute and post-acute phase of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Different pathophysiological mechanisms may be involved, with the trigeminovascular system as a plausible target. Specific evidence-based effective therapeutic options are lacking at present. Headache attributed to SARS-CoV-2 vaccinations is also common, its pathophysiology being unclear. People with primary headache disorders experience headache in the acute phase of COVID-19 and after vaccination more commonly than the general population. Pandemic measures, forcing lifestyle changes, seemed to have had a positive impact on migraine, and changes in headache care (telemedicine) have been effectively introduced. CONCLUSIONS The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic is a global challenge, having an impact on the development of secondary headaches, both in people with or without primary headaches. This has created opportunities to better understand and treat headache and to potentiate strategies to manage patients and ensure care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edoardo Caronna
- Neurology Department, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Department of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.,Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute, Department of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Hayrunnisa Bolay
- Department of Neurology and Algology, NÖROM, Gazi University Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - David Garcia-Azorin
- Headache Unit, Department of Neurology, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain.,Department of Medicine, Universidad de Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain
| | - Ana Beatriz Gago-Veiga
- Headache Unit, Department of Neurology, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa and Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de La Princesa, Madrid, Spain.,Department of Neurology, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Massimiliano Valeriani
- Headache Center, Department of Neuroscience, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Tsubasa Takizawa
- Department of Neurology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Karl Messlinger
- Institute of Physiology and Pathophysiology, Friedrich-Alexander-University, Erlangen-Nuernberg, Germany
| | - Robert E Shapiro
- Department of Neurological Sciences, Larner College of Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, USA
| | - Peter J Goadsby
- NIHR-Wellcome Trust King's Clinical Research Facility, SLaM Biomedical Research Centre, King's College London, London, UK.,Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Messoud Ashina
- Danish Headache Center, Department of Neurology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, University of Copenhagen, Glostrup, Denmark
| | - Cristina Tassorelli
- Department of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.,Headache Science and Neurorehabilitation Centre, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, Pavia, Italy
| | - Hans-Christoph Diener
- Institute of Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology (IMIBE) Faculty of Medicine, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Gisela M Terwindt
- Department of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Patricia Pozo-Rosich
- Neurology Department, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Department of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.,Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute, Department of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Post-COVID Headache: A Literature Review. Curr Pain Headache Rep 2022; 26:835-842. [PMID: 36197571 PMCID: PMC9533267 DOI: 10.1007/s11916-022-01086-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
Purpose of Review Post-COVID headache may be unique in presentation and mechanism, often presenting as a new phenotype in patients with a history of a primary headache disorder or resulting in a new headache syndrome in those without history of headache. This review presents a description of the literature published focused on post-COVID headache. Additionally, we discuss potential mechanisms and considerations for treatment of post-COVID headache. Recent Findings Headache is one of the most common symptoms of COVID. Common characteristics are revealed when reviewing the phenotypes of headaches that have been described in patients with COVID-19, with most headache phenotypes resembling migraine and new persistent daily headache. Post-COVID headaches are often described as moderate to severe, persistent, and treatment refractory. Summary This review highlights the diversity of presentation of headaches that present as a complication of COVID-19. Treatment of post-COVID headache is challenging, especially in the setting of a pandemic where resources are limited. Clinical Case A 42-year-old woman with a history of episodic migraine without aura presents over video visit with a new headache type. Her typical headaches are predominantly left sided, throbbing in nature, and associated with photophobia and phonophobia. They are fully relieved by oral sumatriptan 2 h after treatment. She describes this new headache as a constant, pulsating, holocephalic pain with no other migrainous features that have been ongoing for 6 weeks. She notes that the headache has been persistent since that time. She has tried over-the-counter acetaminophen and ibuprofen and her typical migraine abortive therapy without relief. She is debilitated and wonders if there is anything that will take the pain away. She shares that she tested positive for COVID-19 about 2 days prior to headache onset and has associated rhinorrhea, anosmia, and ageusia.
Collapse
|
7
|
Kushner P, McCarberg BH, Grange L, Kolosov A, Haveric AL, Zucal V, Petruschke R, Bissonnette S. The use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in COVID-19. NPJ Prim Care Respir Med 2022; 32:35. [PMID: 36127354 PMCID: PMC9489480 DOI: 10.1038/s41533-022-00300-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2021] [Accepted: 07/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Early in the COVID-19 pandemic, anecdotal reports emerged suggesting non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) may increase susceptibility to infection and adversely impact clinical outcomes. This narrative literature review (March 2020–July 2021) attempted to clarify the relationship between NSAID use and COVID-19 outcomes related to disease susceptibility or severity. Twenty-four relevant publications (covering 25 studies) reporting original research data were identified; all were observational cohort studies, and eight were described as retrospective. Overall, these studies are consistent in showing that NSAIDs neither increase the likelihood of SARS-CoV-2 infection nor worsen outcomes in patients with COVID-19. This is reflected in current recommendations from major public health authorities across the world, which support NSAID use for analgesic or antipyretic treatment during COVID-19. Thus, there is no basis on which to restrict or prohibit use of these drugs by consumers or patients to manage their health conditions and symptoms during the pandemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pamela Kushner
- Kushner Wellness Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA. .,Department of Family Medicine, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA.
| | - Bill H McCarberg
- Department of Family Medicine, University of California at San Diego School of Medicine, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Laurent Grange
- Rheumatology Department, Grenoble-Alpes University Hospital, Echirolles, France.,President of the French League Against Rheumatism (AFLAR), Paris, France
| | - Anton Kolosov
- Medical Affairs, GSK Consumer Healthcare, Rochester Park, Singapore, Singapore
| | | | - Vincent Zucal
- Consumer Safety, GSK Consumer Healthcare, Warren, NJ, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
da Silva Júnior RT, Santos Apolonio J, Cuzzuol BR, da Costa BT, Silva CS, Araújo GRL, Silva Luz M, Marques HS, Santos LKDS, Pinheiro SLR, Lima de Souza Gonçalves V, Calmon MS, Freire de Melo F. COVID-19 neuropsychiatric repercussions: Current evidence on the subject. World J Methodol 2022; 12:365-380. [PMID: 36186752 PMCID: PMC9516547 DOI: 10.5662/wjm.v12.i5.365] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2022] [Revised: 06/30/2022] [Accepted: 07/25/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection has affected the entire world, causing the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic since it was first discovered in Wuhan, China in December 2019. Among the clinical presentation of the disease, in addition to fever, fatigue, cough, dyspnea, diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, and abdominal pain, infected patients may also experience neurological and psychiatric repercussions during the course of the disease and as a post-COVID-19 sequelae. Thus, headache, dizziness, olfactory and gustatory dysfunction, cerebrovascular disorders, neuromuscular abnormalities, anxiety, depression, and post-traumatic stress disorder can occur both from the infection itself and from social distancing and quarantine. According to current evidence about this infection, the virus has the ability to infect the central nervous system (CNS) via angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptors on host cells. Several studies have shown the presence of ACE2 in nerve cells and nasal mucosa, as well as transmembrane serine protease 2, key points for interaction with the viral Spike glycoprotein and entry into the CNS, being olfactory tract and blood-brain barrier, through hematogenous dissemination, potential pathways. Thus, the presence of SARS-CoV-2 in the CNS supports the development of neuropsychiatric symptoms. The management of these manifestations seems more complex, given that the dense parenchyma and impermeability of brain tissue, despite protecting the brain from the infectious process, may hinder virus elimination. Still, some alternatives used in non-COVID-19 situations may lead to worse prognosis of acute respiratory syndrome, requiring caution. Therefore, the aim of this review is to bring more current points related to this infection in the CNS, as well as the repercussions of the isolation involved by the pandemic and to present perspectives on interventions in this scenario.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jonathan Santos Apolonio
- Instituto Multidisciplinar em Saúde, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Vitória da Conquista 45029094, Brazil
| | - Beatriz Rocha Cuzzuol
- Instituto Multidisciplinar em Saúde, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Vitória da Conquista 45029094, Brazil
| | - Bruna Teixeira da Costa
- Instituto Multidisciplinar em Saúde, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Vitória da Conquista 45029094, Brazil
| | - Camilo Santana Silva
- Instituto Multidisciplinar em Saúde, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Vitória da Conquista 45029094, Brazil
| | - Glauber Rocha Lima Araújo
- Instituto Multidisciplinar em Saúde, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Vitória da Conquista 45029094, Brazil
| | - Marcel Silva Luz
- Instituto Multidisciplinar em Saúde, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Vitória da Conquista 45029094, Brazil
| | - Hanna Santos Marques
- Universidade Estadual do Sudoeste da Bahia, Universidade Estadual do Sudoeste da Bahia, Vitória da Conquista 45083900, Brazil
| | - Luana Kauany de Sá Santos
- Instituto Multidisciplinar em Saúde, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Vitória da Conquista 45029094, Brazil
| | - Samuel Luca Rocha Pinheiro
- Instituto Multidisciplinar em Saúde, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Vitória da Conquista 45029094, Brazil
| | | | - Mariana Santos Calmon
- Instituto Multidisciplinar em Saúde, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Vitória da Conquista 45029094, Brazil
| | - Fabrício Freire de Melo
- Instituto Multidisciplinar em Saúde, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Vitória da Conquista 45029094, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Sampaio Rocha‐Filho PA. Headache associated with COVID‐19: Epidemiology, characteristics, pathophysiology, and management. Headache 2022; 62:650-656. [PMID: 35545780 PMCID: PMC9348060 DOI: 10.1111/head.14319] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2022] [Accepted: 04/04/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Objective Background Method Results Conclusions
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pedro Augusto Sampaio Rocha‐Filho
- Division of Neuropsychiatry Centro de Ciências Médicas Universidade Federal de Pernambuco (UFPE) Recife Brazil
- Hospital Universitario Oswaldo Cruz Universidade de Pernambuco Recife Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Togha M. Headaches attributed to COVID-19 infection. HEADACHE AND MIGRAINE IN PRACTICE 2022. [PMCID: PMC9395209 DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-323-99729-4.00020-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Headache is a common neurologic manifestation of COVID-19 that usually has benign features and has been considered as a good prognostic factor. However, occasionally such symptoms could be due to a serious cause such as cerebral venous sinus thrombosis or meningitis/encephalitis. The activation of the trigeminovascular system has been proposed as an underlying mechanism of headaches that are associated with disease. The ICHD3 criteria can be used to classify headaches as acute related to systemic viral infection, viral meningitis, encephalitis, or other noninflammatory intracranial diseases, as secondary cough headaches, headaches attributed to hypoxia and/or hypercapnia, headaches due to cranial or cervical vascular disorders, and headaches attributed to increased cerebrospinal fluid pressure. Apart from headaches caused by infection with COVID-19, an increasing number of patients, with or without a previous history of headache, have experienced them because of lifestyle changes during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Collapse
|
11
|
Caronna E, Pozo-Rosich P. Headache as a Symptom of COVID-19: Narrative Review of 1-Year Research. Curr Pain Headache Rep 2021; 25:73. [PMID: 34766205 PMCID: PMC8583579 DOI: 10.1007/s11916-021-00987-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Headache is a common symptom of COVID-19 with emerging literature being published on the subject. Although it may seem unspecific, scientific evidence has allowed a better definition of this headache type, revealing relevant associations with other COVID-19 symptoms and prognoses. We therefore sought to highlight the most remarkable findings concerning headache secondary to COVID-19, specifically focusing on epidemiology, characteristics, pathophysiology, and treatments. RECENT FINDINGS The real prevalence of headache as a symptom of COVID-19 is still unclear ranging from 10 to 70%. Headache mainly has a tension-type-like phenotype, although 25% of individuals present with migraine-like features that also occur in patients without personal migraine history. This finding suggests that a likely pathophysiological mechanism is the activation of the trigeminovascular system. SARS-CoV-2 neurotropism can occur by trans-synaptic invasion through the olfactory route from the nasal cavity, leading to anosmia which has been associated with headache. SARS-CoV-2 protein has been found not only in olfactory mucosa and bulbs but also in trigeminal branches and the trigeminal ganglion, supporting this hypothesis. However, other mechanisms such as brain vessels inflammation due to SARS-CoV-2 damage to the endothelium or systemic inflammation in the context of cytokine storm cannot be ruled out. Interestingly, headache has been associated with lower COVID-19 mortality. No specific treatment for COVID-19 headache is available at present. Studies show that investigating COVID-19 headache represents an opportunity not only to better understand COVID-19 in general but also to advance in the knowledge of both secondary and primary headaches. Future research is therefore warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edoardo Caronna
- Neurology Department, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Department of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute, Department of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Patricia Pozo-Rosich
- Neurology Department, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Department of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
- Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute, Department of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Bobker SM, Robbins MS. Virtual Issue: COVID-19 and headache. Headache 2021; 61:412-413. [PMID: 33591579 PMCID: PMC8013424 DOI: 10.1111/head.14085] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2021] [Accepted: 01/26/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah M Bobker
- UCSF Headache Center, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Matthew S Robbins
- Department of Neurology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York Presbyterian, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Kristoffersen ES, Faiz KW, Sandset EC, Storstein AM, Stefansen S, Winsvold BS, Hansen JM. Hospital-based headache care during the Covid-19 pandemic in Denmark and Norway. J Headache Pain 2020; 21:128. [PMID: 33121445 PMCID: PMC7594963 DOI: 10.1186/s10194-020-01195-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2020] [Accepted: 10/19/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The Covid-19 pandemic is causing changes in delivery of medical care worldwide. It is not known how the management of headache patients was affected by the lockdown during the pandemic. The aim of the present study was to investigate how the initial phase of the Covid-19 pandemic affected the hospital management of headache in Denmark and Norway. Methods All neurological departments in Denmark (n = 14) and Norway (n = 18) were invited to a questionnaire survey. The study focused on the lockdown and all questions were answered in regard to the period between March 12th and April 15th, 2020. Results The responder rate was 91% (29/32). Of the neurological departments 86% changed their headache practice during the lockdown. The most common change was a shift to more telephone consultations (86%). Video consultations were offered by 45%. The number of new headache referrals decreased. Only 36% administered botulinum toxin A treatment according to usual schemes. Sixty% reported that fewer patients were admitted for in-hospital emergency diagnostics and treatment. Among departments conducting headache research 57% had to halt ongoing projects. Overall, 54% reported that the standard of care was worse for headache patients during the pandemic. Conclusion Hospital-based headache care and research was impacted in Denmark and Norway during the initial phase of the Covid-19-pandemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Espen Saxhaug Kristoffersen
- Department of Neurology, Akershus University Hospital, PO Box 1000, 1478, Lørenskog, Norway. .,Department of General Practice, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
| | - Kashif Waqar Faiz
- Department of Neurology, Akershus University Hospital, PO Box 1000, 1478, Lørenskog, Norway
| | - Else Charlotte Sandset
- Department of Neurology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,The Norwegian Air Ambulance Foundation, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Simon Stefansen
- National Headache Knowledge Center, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Bendik Slagsvold Winsvold
- Department of Neurology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Research, Innovation and Education, Division of Clinical Neuroscience, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Jakob Møller Hansen
- National Headache Knowledge Center, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Danish Headache Center, Glostrup - University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|