1
|
Moore L, Pakalnis A. Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide Inhibitors in the Treatment of Migraine in the Pediatric and Adolescent Populations: A Review. Pediatr Neurol 2024; 157:87-95. [PMID: 38905744 DOI: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2024.05.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2023] [Revised: 05/07/2024] [Accepted: 05/20/2024] [Indexed: 06/23/2024]
Abstract
There are limited well-studied treatments for migraine in the pediatric population. Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) inhibitors are an established safe and effective treatment in adults, and use may be appropriate for pediatric patients in certain clinical situations. We describe migraine pathophysiology as it relates to CGRP, provide an overview of available medications, and discuss clinical usage in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa Moore
- Department of Neurology, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio; Department of Neurology, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio.
| | - Ann Pakalnis
- Department of Neurology, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio; Department of Neurology, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Scheffler A, Wenzel P, Bendig M, Gendolla A, Basten J, Kleinschnitz C, Nsaka M, Lindner D, Naegel S, Burow P, Fleischmann R, Holle D. Effectiveness and tolerability of eptinezumab in treating patients with migraine resistant to conventional preventive medications and CGRP (receptor) antibodies: a multicentre retrospective real-world analysis from Germany. J Headache Pain 2024; 25:79. [PMID: 38755541 PMCID: PMC11097519 DOI: 10.1186/s10194-024-01788-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2024] [Accepted: 05/09/2024] [Indexed: 05/18/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Eptinezumab is a monoclonal antibody that targets calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP mAb) and is used for migraine prophylaxis. Efficacy data are mainly from clinical trials, real-world data are hardly available yet. Reimbursement policy in Germany leads to eptinezumab mainly being used in patients having failed pre-treatment with other CGRP mAb. To date, it is unclear whether eptinezumab is efficacious and well tolerated in this population and how the treatment response differs from patients who are naive to CGRP mAbs. METHODS We analysed clinical routine data of 79 patients (episodic migraine (EM): n = 19; chronic migraine (CM): n = 60) from four different centres in Germany. All patients were treated with eptinezumab (100mg). Differences in monthly headache (MHD), migraine (MMD) and acute medication days (AMD) after three months were analysed. The correlation of response with the number of CGRP mAb failures was evaluated. Significance level has been corrected (alpha = 0.017). RESULTS After three months MHD, MMD and AMD were significantly reduced. In EM, the median reduction for MHD was 4.0 days (IQR: -6.5 to -1.0; p = 0.001), for MMD 3.0 days (IQR: -5.5 to -1.5; p < 0.001) and for AMD 2.0 days (IQR: -5.0 to -0.5; p = 0.006). In CM, median reduction of MHD was 4 days (IQR: -8.0 to 0.0; p < 0.001), 3.0 days (IQR: -6.0 to-1.0; p < 0.001) for MMD and 1.0 day (IQR: -5.0 to 0.0; p < 0.001) for AMD. All patients were resistant to conventional preventive therapies and most to CGRP mAbs. Fourteen patients had never received a CGRP mAb and 65 patients had received at least one mAb without sufficient effectiveness and/or intolerability (one: n = 20, two: n = 28, three: n = 17). There was a significant association between the number of prior therapies and the 30% MHD responder rate (none: 78.6%, one: 45.0%, two: 32.1%, three: 23.5%, p = 0.010). Regarding tolerability, 10.4% (8/77) reported mild side effects. CONCLUSIONS The effectiveness of eptinezumab is significantly reduced in patients who have not previously responded to other CGRP mAbs. However, limitations such as the retrospective nature of the analysis, the small sample size and the short treatment period with only the lower dose of eptinezumab must be considered when interpreting the results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Armin Scheffler
- Department of Neurology and Centre for Translational Neuro- and Behavioral Sciences (C-TNBS), West German Headache Centre, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, Essen, 45147, Germany.
| | - Pauline Wenzel
- Department of Neurology and Centre for Translational Neuro- and Behavioral Sciences (C-TNBS), West German Headache Centre, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, Essen, 45147, Germany
| | - Merle Bendig
- Department of Neurology, University of Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
| | | | - Jale Basten
- Department of Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Christoph Kleinschnitz
- Department of Neurology and Centre for Translational Neuro- and Behavioral Sciences (C-TNBS), West German Headache Centre, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, Essen, 45147, Germany
| | - Michael Nsaka
- Department of Neurology and Centre for Translational Neuro- and Behavioral Sciences (C-TNBS), West German Headache Centre, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, Essen, 45147, Germany
| | - Diana Lindner
- Department of Neurology and Centre for Translational Neuro- and Behavioral Sciences (C-TNBS), West German Headache Centre, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, Essen, 45147, Germany
| | - Steffen Naegel
- Department of Neurology, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, University Hospital Halle, Halle (Saale), Germany
- Department of Neurology, Alfried-Krupp Krankenhaus, Essen, Germany
| | - Philipp Burow
- Department of Neurology, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, University Hospital Halle, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | | | - Dagny Holle
- Department of Neurology and Centre for Translational Neuro- and Behavioral Sciences (C-TNBS), West German Headache Centre, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, Essen, 45147, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Irimia P, Santos-Lasaosa S, Pozo-Rosich P, Leira R, Pascual J, Láinez JM. Eptinezumab for the preventive treatment of episodic and chronic migraine: a narrative review. Front Neurol 2024; 15:1355877. [PMID: 38523607 PMCID: PMC10959239 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1355877] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2023] [Accepted: 02/19/2024] [Indexed: 03/26/2024] Open
Abstract
Eptinezumab, a monoclonal antibody that targets calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), was recently approved in Europe for the prophylactic treatment of migraine in adults who have at least four migraine days a month. Eptinezumab is administered by intravenous infusion every 12 weeks. During recent months, a considerable amount of evidence from eptinezumab trials has been published. The aim of this review is to describe the existing evidence on the tolerability, safety and efficacy of eptinezumab in patients with migraine. Data from randomized (PROMISE-1, PROMISE-2, RELIEF and DELIVER) and open-label (PREVAIL) phase 3 clinical trials have demonstrated the favorable effect of eptinezumab in migraine symptoms from first day of treatment. These studies showed that eptinezumab results in an overall reduction in mean monthly migraine days (MMDs), increases in the ≥50% and ≥ 75% migraine responder rates (MRRs) and improvements in patient-reported outcome measures in both patients with episodic migraine (EM) and with chronic migraine (CM), including patients who failed previous preventive treatments. The RELIEF trial also showed that eptinezumab, within 2 h of administration, reduced headache pain, migraine-associated symptoms and acute medication use when administered during a migraine attack. Eptinezumab benefits manifested as early as day 1 after dosing and with the subsequent doses lasted up to at least 2 years. Treatment-emergent adverse events reported by ≥2% of patients included upper respiratory tract infection and fatigue. Current evidence demonstrates that eptinezumab has a potent, fast-acting, sustained migraine preventive effect in patients with EM and CM. Eptinezumab has also shown to be well tolerated, supporting its use in the treatment of patients with migraine and inclusion in the current migraine therapeutic options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sonia Santos-Lasaosa
- Aragon Institute for Health Research (IIS Aragon), Hospital Clínico Universitario Lozano Blesa, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Patricia Pozo-Rosich
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
- Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, VHIR, Universitat Autònoma Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Rogelio Leira
- Department of Neurology, Headache Unit, Hospital Clínico Universitario, Clinical Neurosciences Research Laboratory, Health Research Institute of Santiago de Compostela (IDIS), University of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | - Julio Pascual
- Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Universidad de Cantabria and IDIVAL, Santander, Spain
| | - José Miguel Láinez
- Department of Neurology, Hospital Clínico Universitario, Universidad Católica de Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ashina M, Lipton RB, Ailani J, Versijpt J, Sacco S, Mitsikostas DD, Christoffersen CL, Sperling B, Ettrup A. Responder rates with eptinezumab over 24 weeks in patients with prior preventive migraine treatment failures: post hoc analysis of the DELIVER randomized clinical trial. Eur J Neurol 2024; 31:e16131. [PMID: 37955557 DOI: 10.1111/ene.16131] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2023] [Accepted: 10/19/2023] [Indexed: 11/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Eptinezumab reduced monthly migraine days more than placebo in the DELIVER study, a clinical trial with patients with difficult-to-treat migraine and prior preventive treatment failures. This post hoc analysis assesses the sustained response to eptinezumab at the population and patient level and evaluates the potential for response in initial non-responders. METHODS Adults with chronic or episodic migraine and two to four prior preventive treatment failures were randomized to eptinezumab 100 mg, 300 mg or placebo every 12 weeks. Primary outcomes in this post hoc analysis are the proportion of patients with ≥30%, ≥50% or ≥75% reduction in monthly migraine days (i.e., migraine responder rates [MRRs]) during weeks 1-12 and weeks 13-24 and across 4-week intervals. Secondary outcomes are maintenance and shifts in MRRs from weeks 1-12 to weeks 13-24. RESULTS Between weeks 1-12 and 13-24, ≥30% MRRs increased from 65.9% to 70.4% (100 mg) and from 71.0% to 74.5% (300 mg), versus 36.9% to 43.1% (placebo). The ≥50% and ≥75% MRRs were sustained or increased over the 24-week period. The largest increase in ≥30% MRRs occurred after the second infusion with eptinezumab. The percentage of initial non-responders (<30% MRRs during weeks 1-12) who experienced response (≥30% MRRs during weeks 13-24) to the second dose was 34.7% (100 mg) and 30.4% (300 mg) with eptinezumab versus 21.1% with placebo. CONCLUSION Across MRR thresholds, most patients who responded to eptinezumab during weeks 1-12 maintained or improved response during weeks 13-24. More than one-third of initial non-responders became responders after their second infusion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Messoud Ashina
- Danish Headache Center, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Richard B Lipton
- Department of Neurology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - Jessica Ailani
- Department of Neurology, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Jan Versijpt
- Department of Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (UZ Brussel), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Simona Sacco
- Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Dimos D Mitsikostas
- First Neurology Department, Aeginition Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Limberg N. Managing Migraine: Medication Overuse Headache and Treatment with Eptinezumab. Pain Ther 2023; 12:1283-1291. [PMID: 37347339 PMCID: PMC10444718 DOI: 10.1007/s40122-023-00534-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2023] [Accepted: 06/09/2023] [Indexed: 06/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Medication overuse headache (MOH) places both a physical and emotional burden on patients. MOH may occur as a consequence of a negative spiral of events comprising an increasing number of headache days while taking frequent or excessive amounts of medications for acute treatment of headaches or migraine. Despite acute and prophylactic treatment options, there remains a complex subset of patients who fail first-line oral prophylactic therapies due to insufficient response or failure to tolerate, and require access to new prophylactic treatment options, including calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) inhibitors such as eptinezumab. In this article I present a series of clinical scenarios in which the use of eptinezumab may be beneficial, based on the extensive experience I have gained using the treatment, in more than 25 patients, (and over 40 infusions), over a 2-year period. Eptinezumab provides an additional therapeutic modality for patients who are refractory to other migraine medications, including other CGRP pathway monoclonal antibody (mAb) therapies. I discuss within this article the potential role for eptinezumab in various clinical scenarios such as refractory migraine, including MOH, in which the rapid bioavailability of the preparation may be of particular utility. It is important to tailor treatment plans to the individual patient needs and provide other lifestyle and non-drug-based recommendations when treating patients with MOH, who may be appropriate for treatment with eptinezumab.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole Limberg
- Migraine Specialist Brisbane, St Andrew's Place, Suite 312, Level 2, 33 North Street, Spring Hill, Brisbane, QLD, 4000, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Goadsby PJ, Barbanti P, Lambru G, Ettrup A, Christoffersen CL, Josiassen MK, Phul R, Sperling B. Eptinezumab improved patient-reported outcomes and quality of life in patients with migraine and prior preventive treatment failures. Eur J Neurol 2023; 30:1089-1098. [PMID: 36583633 DOI: 10.1111/ene.15670] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2022] [Revised: 10/21/2022] [Accepted: 10/27/2022] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE In the phase 3b, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled DELIVER clinical trial, eptinezumab reduced migraine frequency and headache in adults with two to four prior preventive treatment failures. Here, the effect of eptinezumab on coinciding patient-reported outcomes is reported. METHODS Adults were randomized to receive eptinezumab 100, 300 mg or placebo intravenously at weeks 12 and 24. The EQ-5D-5L, measuring overall patient health, and the six-item Headache Impact Test were completed every 4 weeks. The Patient Global Impression of Change was completed at weeks 4, 12 and 24. Patient-identified most bothersome symptom and the Migraine-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire were administered at weeks 12 and 24. RESULTS Eptinezumab improved patient-reported outcomes more than placebo, starting at week 4 and at all subsequent time points. By week 12, patients' overall health (EQ-5D-5L visual analog scale score) improved with eptinezumab treatment (difference from placebo in change from baseline: 100 mg, 5.1, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.2, 8.1, p < 0.001; 300 mg, 7.5, 95% CI 4.5, 10.4, p < 0.0001). At week 12, eptinezumab improved headache-related quality of life (difference from placebo in change from baseline in Headache Impact Test total score: 100 mg, -3.8, 95% CI -5.0, -2.5, p < 0.0001; 300 mg, -5.4, 95% CI -6.7, -4.2, p < 0.0001), including each Migraine-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire domain (p ≤ 0.0001, all comparisons). Over twice as many patients receiving eptinezumab than placebo reported much or very much improvement on the Patient Global Impression of Change and patient-identified most bothersome symptom. CONCLUSION Patients with two to four prior preventive treatment failures receiving eptinezumab versus placebo reported greater improvements in well-being, quality of life and most bothersome symptoms compared to placebo. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04418765; EudraCT identifier: 2019-004497-25.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter J Goadsby
- NIHR SLaM Clinical Research Facility, and Headache Group Wolfson CARD, King's College London, London, UK
- Department of Neurology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Piero Barbanti
- Headache and Pain Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele, Rome, Italy
- San Raffaele University, Rome, Italy
| | - Giorgio Lambru
- The Headache Service, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospitals NHS Trust, London, UK
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Gantenbein AR, Kleinschmidt A. Is the right way to go in between? : Rimegepant as needed provides preventive benefit. A comment on: monthly migraine days, tablet utilization, and quality of life associated with rimegepant-post hoc results from an open label safety study (BHV3000-201). J Headache Pain 2023; 24:33. [PMID: 36997843 PMCID: PMC10061740 DOI: 10.1186/s10194-023-01565-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2023] [Accepted: 03/09/2023] [Indexed: 04/01/2023] Open
Abstract
In the study by Johnston et al., gepants were meant to be taken to treat emergent migraine. It is tempting to speculate what the effect would be if patients were instructed to take a gepant as needed (PRN) or even prior to headache onset. While the latter sounds irrational at first glance, several studies have shown that a significant proportion of patients are quite proficient in predicting (or simply due to premonitory symptoms noting) their migraine attacks prior to the onset of actual headache. The study by Johnston et al. provides food for thought along these lines and should encourage us to further investigate flexible patient-controlled CGRP blocking as a third, intermediate and potentially cost-effective avenue between acute/rescue treatment and prevention/prophylaxis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andreas R Gantenbein
- Pain and Research Department, ZURZACH Care, Quellenstrasse 34, CH-5330, Bad Zurzach, Switzerland.
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich (USZ), Zurich, Switzerland.
| | - Andreas Kleinschmidt
- Division of Neurology, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University Hospital Geneva (HUG) and Medical Faculty Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Schwedt TJ, Martin A, Kymes S, Talon B, Lee XY, Cady R, Asher D, Karnik-Henry M, Mulvihill E, Bates D, Beusterien K. Patient preferences for attributes of injected or infused preventive migraine medications: Findings from a discrete choice experiment. Headache 2023; 63:484-493. [PMID: 36753057 DOI: 10.1111/head.14476] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2022] [Revised: 11/16/2022] [Accepted: 01/04/2023] [Indexed: 02/09/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess preferences among adults with migraine for differentiating attributes of injected or infused preventive treatment options and evaluate their importance in determining a treatment choice. BACKGROUND Adults with migraine and health-care providers consider many factors when making treatment decisions. Injected or infused preventive migraine treatment options differ in several attributes, including mode of administration and dosing frequency, which may be preferentially selected or avoided by patients. Understanding a patient's preference is important for clinicians as they advise on various treatment options. METHODS A total of 604 US adults diagnosed with migraine participated in an online survey that captured information on demographics, migraine history, and treatment preferences. A discrete choice experiment (DCE) was used to evaluate participants' preferences for specific attributes of injected/infused preventive migraine therapies. The DCE data were utilized to estimate attribute importance (expressed as a percentage) and identify subgroups that had different distributions of preferences. RESULTS In the overall migraine population, mode of administration (28.8%), durability of effectiveness (27.0%), and speed of onset (25.5%) had the highest relative importance, whereas administration setting (9.9%) and dosing frequency (8.8%) had the lowest. Four distinct subgroups were identified: Group 1 (n = 128) preferred self-injection administration and durability of effectiveness; Group 2 (n = 189) expressed aversion to cranial injections; Group 3 (n = 158) prioritized rapid speed of onset; and Group 4 (n = 129) favored health-care provider administration and durability of effectiveness. CONCLUSIONS Speed of onset, durability of effectiveness, and mode of administration are key moderators of treatment preference among US adults with migraine. Certain segments of the migraine population prioritize specific treatment attributes over others, with intravenous infusion not considered a barrier in three of four identified segments. Clinicians can best help their patients find the right medication if they understand which medication attributes are most and least important to them.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Roger Cady
- Lundbeck LLC, Deerfield, Illinois, USA.,RK Consults, Ozark, Missouri, USA.,Missouri State University, Springfield, Missouri, USA
| | | | | | | | - Dawn Bates
- Cerner Enviza, Kansas City, Missouri, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Barbanti P, Goadsby PJ, Lambru G, Ettrup A, Christoffersen CL, Josiassen MK, Phul R, Sperling B. Effects of eptinezumab on self-reported work productivity in adults with migraine and prior preventive treatment failure in the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled DELIVER study. J Headache Pain 2022; 23:153. [PMID: 36460983 PMCID: PMC9716694 DOI: 10.1186/s10194-022-01521-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2022] [Accepted: 11/02/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The multinational phase 3b DELIVER trial was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of eptinezumab for migraine prevention in patients with prior preventive treatment failures across 17 countries. In the placebo-controlled portion, eptinezumab relative to placebo demonstrated greater reductions in migraine and headache frequency, migraine and headache severity, and acute medication use. The objective of this report is to describe the effects of eptinezumab on self-reported work productivity in the placebo-controlled portion of DELIVER. METHODS Adults 18-75 years of age with migraine and documented evidence of 2 to 4 prior preventive treatment failures in the past 10 years were randomized to receive eptinezumab 100 mg, 300 mg, or placebo intravenously (IV) every 12 weeks. The Work Productivity and Activity Impairment questionnaire specific to migraine (WPAI:M), which comprises 6 items (4 of which are completed by currently employed patients only), was administered every 4 weeks. Changes from baseline in subscores (absenteeism, presenteeism, work productivity loss, and activity impairment) were calculated based on item responses. A mixed model for repeated measures was used to analyze changes from baseline in WPAI:M subscores. RESULTS A total of 890 adults (mean age, 43.8 years) were included in the full analysis set (eptinezumab 100 mg, n = 299; eptinezumab 300 mg, n = 293; placebo, n = 298). Mean WPAI:M subscores at baseline indicated a negative impact of migraine attacks on work productivity and ability to complete normal daily activities. Eptinezumab improved WPAI:M subscores more than placebo at all assessment points throughout the study. Mean changes from baseline in self-reported work productivity loss were -19.5, -24.0, and -9.7 at Week 12; and -22.6, -20.2, and -7.2 at Week 24 (all P < 0.001 vs placebo) for eptinezumab 100 mg, eptinezumab 300 mg, and placebo, respectively. Mean changes from baseline in activity impairment were -21.3, -23.8, and -11.2 at Week 12; and -24.7, -22.6, and -10.1 at Week 24 (all P < 0.0001 vs placebo). Similarly, mean improvements in absenteeism and presenteeism were greater in the eptinezumab groups than in the groups receiving placebo at all timepoints (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION In adults with migraine and prior preventive treatment failure, eptinezumab 100 mg and 300 mg IV every 12 weeks improved absenteeism, presenteeism, work productivity loss, and activity impairment more than placebo. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT04418765 ); EudraCT (Identifier: 2019-004497-25) ( https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search/trial/2019-004497-25/PL ). Eptinezumab improves self-reported work productivity in patients with migraine and prior preventive treatment failures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Piero Barbanti
- Headache and Pain Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Pisana, Via della Pisana 235, 00163, Rome, Italy.
- San Raffaele University, Rome, Italy.
| | - Peter J Goadsby
- NIHR King's Clinical Research Facility, & Headache Group, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Giorgio Lambru
- The Headache Service, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospitals NHS Trust, London, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Pozo-Rosich P, Dodick DW, Ettrup A, Hirman J, Cady R. Shift in diagnostic classification of migraine after initiation of preventive treatment with eptinezumab: post hoc analysis of the PROMISE studies. BMC Neurol 2022; 22:394. [PMID: 36284281 PMCID: PMC9594902 DOI: 10.1186/s12883-022-02914-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2022] [Accepted: 10/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Monthly headache frequency directly correlates with personal/societal burden and impacts severity and preventive treatment decisions. This post hoc analysis identified shifts from higher to lower frequency headache categories over 6 months in patients with migraine participating in the PROMISE clinical trials receiving two eptinezumab doses. METHODS Headache frequency at baseline and over study months 1-6 was categorized into 4 groups: chronic migraine (CM; ≥ 15 monthly headache days [MHDs]), high-frequency episodic migraine (HFEM; 10-14 MHDs), low-frequency episodic migraine (LFEM; 4-9 MHDs), and ≤ 3 MHDs. Outcomes included the percentage of patients within each MHD category, the percentage of patients improving by ≥ 1 MHD category, and the number of months with reduction of ≥ 1 MHD category. Data from patients who received approved eptinezumab doses (100 mg or 300 mg) or placebo were included. RESULTS Mean headache frequency at baseline in PROMISE-1 was 10 MHDs; most patients were classified as having HFEM (48.6%) or LFEM (43.9%). At Month 1, 62/221 (28.1%), 75/222 (33.8%), and 45/222 (20.3%) patients who received eptinezumab 100 mg, 300 mg, and placebo had ≤ 3 MHDs, with 97/221 (43.9%), 108/222 (48.6%), and 84/222 (37.8%), respectively, falling below the diagnostic EM threshold at Month 6. More than one-third (79/221 [35.7%], 83/222 [37.4%], and 68/222 [30.6%] of patients in the eptinezumab 100 mg, 300 mg, and placebo groups, respectively), had 6 months of reduction of ≥ 1 frequency category. At baseline in PROMISE-2, mean headache frequency was 20.5 MHDs. All patients (100%) in the eptinezumab 100 mg and placebo groups had CM, as did 99.4% of patients receiving eptinezumab 300 mg. At Month 1, 209/356 (58.7%), 216/350 (61.7%), and 167/366 (45.6%) patients treated with eptinezumab 100 mg, 300 mg, and placebo had ≤ 14 MHDs, with 240/356 (67.4%), 249/350 (71.1%), and 221/366 (60.4%), respectively, falling below CM threshold at Month 6. Additionally, 153/356 (43.0%), 169/350 (48.3%), and 116/366 (31.7%) patients in the eptinezumab 100 mg, 300 mg, and placebo groups, respectively, had 6 months of reduction of ≥ 1 frequency category. CONCLUSION In the PROMISE studies, episodic and chronic migraine patients treated with eptinezumab were more likely to reduce their headache frequency versus placebo, which directly and in a sustained way improved their diagnostic category classification. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02559895, NCT02974153.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patricia Pozo-Rosich
- grid.7080.f0000 0001 2296 0625Neurology Department, Headache Unit, Vall d’Hebron, University Hospital and Research Institute, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain ,grid.7080.f0000 0001 2296 0625Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Department de Medicina, Vall d’Hebron, University Hospital and Research Institute, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - David W. Dodick
- grid.417468.80000 0000 8875 6339Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ USA ,Atria Institute, New York, NY USA
| | - Anders Ettrup
- grid.424580.f0000 0004 0476 7612H. Lundbeck A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Joe Hirman
- Pacific Northwest Statistical Consulting, Inc., Woodinville, WA USA
| | - Roger Cady
- grid.419796.4Lundbeck LLC, Deerfield, IL USA ,RK Consults, Ozark, MO USA ,grid.260126.10000 0001 0745 8995Missouri State University, Springfield, MO USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Switzer MP, Robinson JE, Joyner KR, Morgan KW. Atogepant for the prevention of episodic migraine in adults. SAGE Open Med 2022; 10:20503121221128688. [PMID: 36226229 PMCID: PMC9549103 DOI: 10.1177/20503121221128688] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2022] [Accepted: 09/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective Atogepant is a newly approved medication for the prevention of migraine. This review aims to discuss the efficacy, safety, cost, and place in therapy of atogepant. Methods The authors performed a systematic search for sources, including articles, abstracts, and poster presentations. Queried databases were the National Institute of Health, US National Library of Medicine Clinical Trials, PubMed, European PMC, and the Cochrane Library. Search terms included atogepant, QULIPTA™, AGN-241689, MK-803, and N02CD07. Full-text, English language, randomized-controlled trials from 1 February 2012 to 1 February 2022 were included in the review. Additional relevant prescribing information, abstracts, and articles identified through the search were considered for inclusion in this review. A total of 193 database entries were evaluated for inclusion in this narrative review. Three articles representing two randomized controlled trials were reviewed. Results and conclusions Atogepant, a small-molecule calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptor antagonist, is a daily oral treatment for migraine prevention. In placebo-controlled clinical trials, atogepant decreased mean monthly migraine days (MMD) over 12 weeks in patients with episodic migraine. Major treatment-related adverse effects include nausea and constipation. Long-term placebo-controlled efficacy and safety studies, chronic migraine studies, and studies in patients that failed more than two classes of preventive therapies are still pending. Atogepant represents one of many novel therapies for the prevention of migraine. To date, no head-to-head comparisons of atogepant versus other agents indicated for migraine prevention have been published. Atogepant offers patients an alternative therapy to injectable or infusion monoclonal antibody treatments and offers an alternative to non-specific migraine medications that are associated with poor tolerability. Due to its high cost and narrower therapeutic indications, atogepant may be reserved for a small subset of migraineurs who prefer oral therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Kayla Rena Joyner
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, Bernard J. Dunn School of Pharmacy, Shenandoah University, Winchester, VA, USA
- Valley Health Winchester Medical Center, Winchester, VA, USA
| | - Kelsey Woods Morgan
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, Bernard J. Dunn School of Pharmacy, Shenandoah University, Winchester, VA, USA
- Valley Health Winchester Medical Center, Winchester, VA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Holdridge A, Buczyner J, Aymat CC, Le A. Prevention of Migraine. Semin Neurol 2022; 42:558-570. [PMID: 36513096 DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1758781] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Migraine, a primary headache disorder is a chronic and complex neurological disease that affects millions of people worldwide, impacting their quality of life. It is one of the most common reasons why individuals seek the advice of their physician, and is one of the most common referrals seen in the offices of general neurologists and headache specialists. In the past decade, there has been robust research on not only the pathophysiology of migraine but in the efforts to treat and, importantly, prevent. The introduction of calcitonin gene related peptide antagonists (CGRP-A) have opened new doors for preventive treatment options. OnabotulinumtoxinA (BoNTA) has remained a staple in the treatment of chronic migraine with data emerging with combination therapy. Neurostimulation has offered additional nonpharmacologic approaches to migraine treatment. In addition to lifestyle and behavioral modifications, these have changed the landscape of migraine prevention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashley Holdridge
- Department of Neurology and Headache, Advocate Aurora HealthCare, Whitefish Bay, Wisconsin
| | - Jennifer Buczyner
- Department of Neurology, First Choice Neurology, Palm Beach Gardens, Florida
| | - Cristina Cabret Aymat
- Department of Neurology and Headache, Ochsner Health Center - Covington, Covington, Louisiana
| | - Ariel Le
- Department of Neurology, First Choice Neurology, Palm Beach Gardens, Florida
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Melhado EM, Santos PSF, Kaup AO, da Costa ATNM, Roesler CADP, Piovesan ÉJ, Sarmento EM, Theotonio GOM, de Campos HC, Fortini I, de Souza JA, Maciel JA, Segundo JBA, de Carvalho JJF, Speziali JG, Calia LC, Barea LM, Queiroz LP, Souza MNP, Figueiredo MRCF, Costa MENDM, Peres MFP, Jurno ME, Peixoto PM, Kowacs PA, Rocha-Filho PAS, Moreira PF, Silva-Neto RP, Fragoso YD. Consensus of the Brazilian Headache Society (SBCe) for the Prophylactic Treatment of Episodic Migraine: part I. ARQUIVOS DE NEURO-PSIQUIATRIA 2022; 80:845-861. [PMID: 36252594 PMCID: PMC9703891 DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1756441] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
The Brazilian Headache Society (Sociedade Brasileira de Cefaleia, SBCe, in Portuguese) nominated a Committee of Authors with the aim of establishing a consensus with recommendations regarding prophylactic treatment for episodic migraine based on articles published in the worldwide literature, as well as personal experience. Migraine affects 1 billion people around the world and more than 30 million Brazilians. In addition, it is an underdiagnosed and undertreated disorder. It is well known within the medical community of neurologists, and especially among headache specialists, that there is a need to disseminate knowledge about prophylactic treatment for migraine. For this purpose, together with the need for drug updates and to expand knowledge of the disease itself (frequency, intensity, duration, impact and perhaps the progression of migraine), this Consensus was developed, following a full online methodology, by 12 groups who reviewed and wrote about the pharmacological categories of the drugs used and, at the end of the process, met to read and establish conclusions for this document. The drug classes studied were: anticonvulsants, tricyclic antidepressants, monoclonal anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide (anti-CGRP) antibodies, beta-blockers, antihypertensives, calcium channel inhibitors, other antidepressants (selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, SSRIs, and dual-action antidepressants), other drugs, and polytherapy. Hormonal treatment and anti-inflammatories and triptans in minimum prophylaxis schemes (miniprophylaxis) will be covered in a specific chapter. The drug classes studied for part I of the Consensus were: anticonvulsants, tricyclic antidepressants, monoclonal anti-CGRP antibodies, and beta-blockers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eliana Meire Melhado
- Centro Universitário Padre Albino, Faculdade de Medicina, Departamento de Neurologia, Catanduva SP, Brazil
| | - Paulo Sergio Faro Santos
- Instituto de Neurologia de Curitiba, Departamento de Neurologia, Setor de Cefaleia e Dor Orofacial, Curitiba PR, Brazil
| | - Alexandre Ottoni Kaup
- Houston Headache Clinic, Houston TX, United States,Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Departamento de Neurologia, São Paulo SP, Brazil,Universidade de Santo Amaro, São Paulo SP, Brazil
| | | | | | - Élcio Juliato Piovesan
- Universidade Federal do Paraná, Departamento de Clínica Médica, Disciplina de Neurologia, Curitiba PR, Brazil
| | | | | | | | - Ida Fortini
- Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Departamento de Neurologia, São Paulo SP, Brazil
| | - Jano Alves de Souza
- Universidade Federal Fluminense, Departamento de Medicina Clínica, Disciplina de Neurologia, Niterói RJ, Brazil
| | - Jayme Antunes Maciel
- Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Departamento de Neurologia, Campinas SP, Brazil
| | | | - João José Freitas de Carvalho
- Unichristus, Curso de Medicina, Disciplina de Neurologia, Fortaleza CE, Brazil,Hospital Geral de Fortaleza, Serviço de Neurologia, Núcleo de Cefaleias, Fortaleza CE, Brazil
| | - José Geraldo Speziali
- Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Departamento de Neurologia, Ribeirão Preto SP, Brazil
| | - Leandro Cortoni Calia
- Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Escola Paulista de Medicina, São Paulo SP, Brazil
| | - Liselotte Menke Barea
- Fundação Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre, Disciplina de Neurologia, Porto Alegre RS, Brazil
| | - Luiz Paulo Queiroz
- Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Hospital Universitário, Serviço de Neurologia, Florianópolis SC, Brazil
| | | | | | | | | | - Mauro Eduardo Jurno
- Fundação José Bonifácio Lafayette de Andrada, Faculdade de Medicina de Barbacena, Barbacena MG, Brazil,Fundação Hospitalar do Estado de Minas Gerais, Hospital Regional de Barbacena Dr. José Américo, Barbacena MG, Brazil
| | | | - Pedro André Kowacs
- Instituto de Neurologia de Curitiba, Serviço de Neurologia, Curitiba PR, Brazil,Universidade Federal do Paraná, Complexo Hospital de Clínicas, Serviço de Neurologia, Curitiba PR, Brazil
| | - Pedro Augusto Sampaio Rocha-Filho
- Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Centro de Ciências Médicas, Área de Neuropsquiatria, Recife PE, Brazil,Universidade de Pernambuco, Hospital Universitário Oswaldo Cruz, Ambulatório de Cefaleias, Recife PR, Brazil
| | - Pedro Ferreira Moreira
- Universidade Federal Fluminense, Hospital Universitário Antônio Pedro, Departamento de Medicina Clínica, Niterói RJ, Brazil
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Cady R, Lipton RB, Buse DC, Josiassen MK, Lindsten A, Ettrup A. Optimization of acute medication use following eptinezumab initiation during a migraine attack: post hoc analysis of the RELIEF study. J Headache Pain 2022; 23:91. [PMID: 35902796 PMCID: PMC9336038 DOI: 10.1186/s10194-022-01463-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2022] [Accepted: 07/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The benefits of preventive treatment on the effectiveness of migraine management have rarely been examined. This post hoc analysis investigated the impact of eptinezumab on the optimization of acute medication effectiveness using the 4-item Migraine Treatment Optimization Questionnaire (mTOQ-4) to measure acute medication optimization over 4 weeks post-infusion. METHODS RELIEF was a 12-week, phase 3, multicenter, parallel-group, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial conducted in patients aged 18-75 years with a ≥ 1-year history of migraine and 4-15 migraine days per month in the 3 months prior to screening. Patients were randomized 1:1 to a 30-min infusion of eptinezumab 100 mg or placebo within 1-6 h of a qualifying migraine attack. The mTOQ-6 and 6-item Headache Impact Test (HIT-6) were administered at screening visit and week 4. From the mTOQ-6, we calculated the mTOQ-4 using the following items: "2-h pain free," "24-h relief," "able to plan," and "feeling in control" to measure acute medication optimization. RESULTS A total of 238 patients received eptinezumab 100 mg and 226 provided week 4 data; 242 received placebo and 232 provided week 4 data. In the eptinezumab arm, the proportion of patients with moderate/maximal optimization increased from 31.4% at baseline to 58.0% (26.6 percentage point increase) at week 4. The corresponding proportions in the placebo group were 40.5% to 50.4% (9.9 percentage point increase). Eptinezumab treatment was associated with numerically larger improvements in HIT-6 at week 4. Relative improvements with eptinezumab vs. placebo from baseline to week 4 in HIT-6 were greater in those with poor treatment optimization at baseline. CONCLUSIONS In comparison with placebo, treatment with eptinezumab was associated with improvements in acute medication optimization as measured by mTOQ and reductions in headache impact, as measured by HIT-6. These benefits were greater in those with poor acute treatment optimization prior to preventive treatment with eptinezumab. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04152083 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roger Cady
- RK Consults, Ozark, MO, United States.,Missouri State University, Springfield, MO, United States.,Lundbeck LLC, Deerfield, IL, United States
| | - Richard B Lipton
- Department of Neurology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, United States
| | - Dawn C Buse
- Department of Neurology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, United States.,Vector Psychometric Group, LLC, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Ashina M, Lanteri-Minet M, Pozo-Rosich P, Ettrup A, Christoffersen CL, Josiassen MK, Phul R, Sperling B. Safety and efficacy of eptinezumab for migraine prevention in patients with two-to-four previous preventive treatment failures (DELIVER): a multi-arm, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3b trial. Lancet Neurol 2022; 21:597-607. [DOI: 10.1016/s1474-4422(22)00185-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2022] [Revised: 04/05/2022] [Accepted: 04/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
|
16
|
Eller M, Cheng S. Migraine management: an update for the 2020s. Intern Med J 2022; 52:1123-1128. [PMID: 35879242 PMCID: PMC9545433 DOI: 10.1111/imj.15843] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2021] [Accepted: 02/19/2022] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Migraine is a common malady cutting across socioeconomic and ethnic divides in Australia. It is typically diagnosed late with significant impact on quality of life. Management options have emerged over the past several years that promise simpler treatment regimens with less potential for side‐effects. The development of rationally designed migraine preventives is the most significant advance in treatment since the development of the triptans and delivers significant hope to many headache sufferers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Eller
- Monash Medical Centre and Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Shuli Cheng
- Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Atogepant for the Prevention of Episodic Migraine in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Efficacy and Safety. Neurol Ther 2022; 11:1235-1252. [PMID: 35705886 PMCID: PMC9338214 DOI: 10.1007/s40120-022-00370-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2022] [Accepted: 05/25/2022] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction The inhibition of the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) pathway has attracted interest in pharmacological research on migraine. Atogepant is a potent, selective, orally available antagonist of the CGRP receptor approved as a preventive treatment of episodic migraine. This systematic review with meta-analysis aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of atogepant for the prevention of episodic migraine in adult patients. Methods Randomized, placebo-controlled, single or double-blinded trials were identified through a systematic literature search (December week 4, 2021). Main outcomes included the changes from baseline in monthly migraine days and the incidence of adverse events (AEs) and treatment withdrawal due to AEs. Mean difference (MD) and risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were estimated. Results Two trials were included, overall enrolling 1550 patients. A total of 408 participants were randomized to placebo, 314 to atogepant 10 mg, 411 to atogepant 30 mg, and 417 to atogepant 60 mg once daily. The mean age of the patients was 41.0 years and 87.7% were women. The reduction in the mean number of migraine days from baseline across the 12-week treatment period was significantly greater among patients treated with atogepant at either the daily dose of 10 mg (MD − 1.16, 95% CI − 1.60 to − 0.73, p < 0.001), 30 mg (MD − 1.15, 95% CI − 1.54 to − 0.76, p < 0.001), or 60 mg (MD − 1.20, 95% CI − 2.18 to − 0.22, p = 0.016) than with placebo. There were no differences in the occurrence of AEs and drug withdrawal due to AEs between atogepant and placebo groups. Constipation was more commonly observed in patients treated with atogepant at 30 mg/day than placebo (RR 5.19, 95% CI 2.00–13.46; p = 0.001). Treatment with atogepant at the daily dose of 60 mg was associated with a higher risk of constipation (RR 4.92, 95% CI 1.89–12.79; p = 0.001) and nausea (RR 2.73, 95% CI 1.47–5.06; p = 0.001) than placebo. Conclusion Atogepant is an efficacious and overall well-tolerated treatment for the prevention of episodic migraine in adults. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40120-022-00370-8.
Collapse
|
18
|
Gottschalk C, Buse DC, Marmura MJ, Torphy B, Pavlovic JM, Dumas PK, Lalvani N, Blumenfeld A. The importance of an early onset of migraine prevention: an evidence-based, hypothesis-driven scoping literature review. Ther Adv Neurol Disord 2022; 15:17562864221095902. [PMID: 35662957 PMCID: PMC9160905 DOI: 10.1177/17562864221095902] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2022] [Accepted: 03/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Recently approved migraine preventive therapies facilitate rapid control of migraine activity, potentially improving patients’ lives and minimizing the societal burden of migraine. This review synthesizes available evidence on rates and timing of early onset of migraine prevention and identifies patient-level outcomes related to early onset prevention. This evidence-based scoping review identified all available clinical trial evidence regarding the early onset of prevention of migraine, under the hypothesis ‘Patients with migraine (episodic or chronic) report additional benefits when receiving an approved migraine preventive treatment that demonstrates an early onset of prevention’. Early onset of prevention was defined as migraine preventive benefits within 30 days post-administration. PubMed, EMBASE, and CINAHL were searched for publications between 1988 and 2020. Overall, 16 publications described 18 studies. All studies were conducted in approved treatments [four anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) monoclonal antibodies and one chemodenervation agent] in patients with episodic/chronic migraine; no publications were identified for traditional oral agents for early migraine prevention. Compared to placebo, erenumab (three studies) reduced weekly migraine days within 1 week; fremanezumab (six studies) increased reports of no headache of at least moderate severity on Day 1 and significantly reduced migraine frequency within 1 week; galcanezumab (three studies) significantly reduced the mean number of patients with migraine beginning Day 1 and each day of the first week; eptinezumab (four studies) significantly reduced migraine attack likelihood on Day 1 by > 50% versus baseline; and onabotulinumtoxinA (two studies) reduced headache and migraine days within 1 week. Four publications described function, disability, and quality of life improvements as early as Week 4; none reported cost–benefit. Anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies (erenumab, fremanezumab, galcanezumab, and eptinezumab) and a chemodenervation agent (onabotulinumtoxinA) provide clinically relevant benefits during the first treatment week. Literature describing clinically relevant benefits regarding early onset of prevention in patients with migraine is limited.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher Gottschalk
- Division of General Neurology, Neurology, Yale School of Medicine, Yale Physicians Building, 800 Howard Avenue, Ste Lower Level, New Haven, CT 06519, USA
| | - Dawn C Buse
- Montefiore Headache Center, Department of Neurology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - Michael J Marmura
- Jefferson Headache Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Bradley Torphy
- Chicago Headache Center and Research Institute, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Jelena M Pavlovic
- Montefiore Headache Center, Department of Neurology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
| | | | - Nim Lalvani
- American Migraine Foundation, Mount Royal, NJ, USA
| | - Andrew Blumenfeld
- Headache Center of Southern California, The Neurology Center of Southern California, Carlsbad, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Ailani J, McAllister P, Winner PK, Chakhava G, Krog Josiassen M, Lindsten A, Sperling B, Ettrup A, Cady R. Rapid resolution of migraine symptoms after initiating the preventive treatment eptinezumab during a migraine attack: results from the randomized RELIEF trial. BMC Neurol 2022; 22:205. [PMID: 35659622 PMCID: PMC9164335 DOI: 10.1186/s12883-022-02714-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2022] [Accepted: 05/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Eptinezumab is an anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) monoclonal antibody approved for the preventive treatment of migraine. In the phase 3 RELIEF study, eptinezumab resulted in shorter time to headache pain freedom and time to absence of most bothersome symptom (MBS; including nausea, photophobia, or phonophobia) compared with placebo when administered during a migraine attack. The objective of this exploratory analysis was to examine the earliest time points that eptinezumab separated from placebo (P < .05) on headache- and migraine-associated symptoms when administered during a migraine attack. METHODS RELIEF, a multicenter, parallel-group, double-blind trial, occurred from November 7, 2019, through July 8, 2020. Adults considered candidates for preventive treatment were randomized to eptinezumab 100 mg (N = 238) or placebo (N = 242) administered intravenously over 30 min within 1-6 h of migraine onset. Outcome measures included headache pain freedom/relief and absence of MBS, patient's choice of photophobia, phonophobia, or nausea, at regular intervals from 0.5 to 48 h after infusion start. Censoring was applied at time of acute rescue medication use. RESULTS At hour 1, more eptinezumab-treated patients achieved headache pain freedom (9.7%), headache pain relief (38.7%), and absence of MBS (33.2%) versus placebo (4.1%, 26.9%, and 22.1%, respectively; P < .05 all), with separation from placebo (P < .05) through hour 48. Eptinezumab separated from placebo (P < .05) at hour 1 in absence-of-photophobia (29.4% vs 17.0%) and absence-of-phonophobia (41.2% vs 27.2%) and through hour 48. Initial separation from placebo (P < .05) in absence-of-nausea occurred at end-of-infusion (0.5 h; 36.7% vs 25.4%, respectively). CONCLUSION Preventive treatment with eptinezumab initiated during a migraine attack resulted in more patients achieving headache pain freedom/relief and absence of MBS, with separation from placebo (P < .05) as early as 0.5-1 h following the start of infusion. Rapid resolution of headache- and migraine-associated symptoms by a peripherally acting, intravenously administered antibody suggest a peripheral site of pharmacological action for CGRP blockade. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04152083 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica Ailani
- Department of Neurology, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Peter McAllister
- New England Institute for Neurology and Headache, Stamford, CT, USA
| | - Paul K Winner
- Palm Beach Headache Center, West Palm Beach, FL, USA
| | - George Chakhava
- Georgian Association of Medical Specialties, Multiprofile Clinic Consilium Medulla, D.Tvildiani Medical University, Tbilisi, Georgia
| | | | | | | | | | - Roger Cady
- Lundbeck LLC, Deerfield, IL, USA.
- RK Consults, Ozark, MO, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Schim JD, Anderson C, Brunner E, Hirman J, Ogbru A, Cady R, McGill L. Likelihood of response with subsequent dosing for patients with migraine and initial suboptimal response with eptinezumab: A post hoc analysis of two placebo‐controlled randomized clinical trials. Headache 2022; 62:558-565. [PMID: 35524405 PMCID: PMC9321567 DOI: 10.1111/head.14302] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2021] [Revised: 02/16/2022] [Accepted: 03/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Jack D. Schim
- Headache Center of Southern California Carlsbad California USA
| | | | | | - Joe Hirman
- Pacific Northwest Statistical Consulting Woodinville Washington USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
McAllister P, Kudrow D, Cady R, Hirman J, Ettrup A. Reduction in migraine-associated burden after eptinezumab treatment in patients with chronic migraine. Cephalalgia 2022; 42:1005-1012. [PMID: 35332807 PMCID: PMC9445399 DOI: 10.1177/03331024221089567] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Objective To examine changes in the occurrence, severity, and symptoms of headache episodes in patients with chronic migraine following eptinezumab treatment. Methods PROMISE-2 was a double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial that randomized adults with chronic migraine to eptinezumab 100 mg, 300 mg, or placebo IV every 12 weeks for up to 24 weeks (2 infusions). Headache episodes (migraine and non-migraine) and their characteristics were reported in daily electronic diaries during the 28-day baseline and throughout the 24-week treatment period. Results A total of 1072 patients were included in this post hoc analysis. Mean monthly headache days decreased by 8.9 (100 mg) and 9.7 (300 mg) compared to a 7.3 decrease in placebo over the first 4-week interval post initial dose and reductions were maintained throughout the 24-week treatment period. Mean monthly headache episodes also decreased by 8.4 (100 mg) and 9.0 (300 mg) compared to a decrease of 7.1 with placebo. The proportion of headache episodes that were migraine attacks decreased by 11.2% (100 mg), 12.4% (300 mg), and 3.9% (placebo), and among remaining headaches decreases in severe pain, nausea, phonophobia, photophobia, and physical activity limitations were numerically greater than placebo. Conclusions Patients with chronic migraine treated with eptinezumab decreased the monthly severity and frequency of headache days and episodes more than placebo. Beyond decreased headache frequency, patients treated with eptinezumab reported a reduction in the percent of remaining headache episodes that were migraine attacks, as well as a decrease in burdensome symptoms of headache episodes, indicating additional decreased headache severity after eptinezumab treatment. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02974153; registered November 23, 2016.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter McAllister
- New England Institute for Neurology and Headache, Stamford, CT, USA
| | - David Kudrow
- California Medical Clinic for Headache, Santa Monica, CA, USA
| | | | - Joe Hirman
- Northwest Statistical Consulting, Inc., Woodinville, WA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Ashina M, McAllister P, Cady R, Hirman J, Ettrup A. Efficacy and safety of eptinezumab in patients with migraine and self-reported aura: Post hoc analysis of PROMISE-1 and PROMISE-2. Cephalalgia 2022; 42:696-704. [PMID: 35302389 PMCID: PMC9218409 DOI: 10.1177/03331024221077646] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Background This post hoc subgroup analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of eptinezumab for migraine prevention in patients with migraine and self-reported aura. Methods PROMISE-1 (NCT02559895; episodic migraine) and PROMISE-2 (NCT02974153; chronic migraine) were randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials that evaluated eptinezumab for migraine prevention. In both studies, the primary outcome was the mean change from baseline in monthly migraine days over Weeks 1–12. Patients in this analysis included those who self-reported migraine with aura at screening. Results Of patients with episodic migraine, ∼75% reported a history of aura at screening; of patients with chronic migraine, ∼35% reported a history of aura. Changes in monthly migraine days over Weeks 1–12 were –4.0 (100 mg) and –4.2 (300 mg) with eptinezumab versus –3.1 with placebo in patients with episodic migraine with aura, and were –7.1 (100 mg) and –7.6 (300 mg) with eptinezumab versus –6.0 with placebo in patients with chronic migraine with aura. Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported by 56.0% (100 mg), 57.4% (300 mg), and 55.4% (placebo) of patients. Conclusions The preventive migraine efficacy of eptinezumab in patients in the PROMISE studies who self-reported aura was comparable to the overall study populations, demonstrating a similarly favorable safety and tolerability profile. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers: NCT02559895 and NCT02974153
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Messoud Ashina
- Danish Headache Center, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Peter McAllister
- New England Institute for Neurology and Headache, Stamford, CT, USA
| | | | - Joe Hirman
- Pacific Northwest Statistical Consulting, Inc., Woodinville, WA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Ailani J, Winner P, Hartry A, Brevig T, Bøg M, Lassen AB, Marsh K, Cutts K, Le Lay A. Patient preference for early onset of efficacy of preventive migraine treatments. Headache 2022; 62:374-382. [PMID: 35187644 PMCID: PMC9306969 DOI: 10.1111/head.14255] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2021] [Revised: 11/17/2021] [Accepted: 12/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Objective The objective of this study was to ascertain to what extent adults with migraine value an early onset of efficacy for preventive migraine treatments. Background In placebo‐controlled clinical trials, treatment with eptinezumab resulted in a lower proportion of adults with migraine on the first day following infusion (day 1; 14% point‐reduction for chronic migraine [CM] in PROMISE‐2 and 8% point‐reduction for episodic migraine [EM] in PROMISE‐1). Methods Adults with migraine completed an online preference‐elicitation thresholding exercise to ascertain to what extent they value not having a migraine on day 1 postdosing relative to a clinically relevant reduction in number of migraine days during the first month postdosing (≥2 migraine‐free days for CM and ≥1 migraine‐free days for EM). Results One hundred and one participants (mean age, 50.6 ± 12.4 years; 81 [80%] women) were included. In participants with CM, 29 of 50 (58%) considered the eptinezumab‐generated reduction in the likelihood of migraine on day 1 postdosing to be at least as important as a clinically relevant reduction in number of migraine days the first month postdosing, whereas 37 of 50 (74%) considered a clinically relevant reduction of migraine days the first month postdosing to have a value equivalent to the eptinezumab‐generated reduction in the likelihood of migraine on day 1 postdosing. In participants with EM, 18 of 35 (51%) considered the eptinezumab‐generated reduction in the likelihood of migraine on day 1 postdosing to be at least as important as a clinically relevant reduction in migraine days the first month postdosing, whereas 24 of 35 (69%) considered a clinically relevant reduction of migraine days the first month postdosing to have a value equivalent to the eptinezumab‐generated reduction in the likelihood of migraine on day 1 postdosing. Conclusion Most participants considered the reduction in the likelihood of migraine offered by eptinezumab on day 1 postdosing to be at least as important as a clinically relevant reduction in migraine days the first month postdosing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica Ailani
- Department of Neurology Medstar Georgetown University Hospital Washington DC USA
| | - Paul Winner
- Palm Beach Headache Center West Palm Beach Florida USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Kevin Marsh
- Patient Centered Research Evidera Bethesda Maryland USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Buse DC, Winner PK, Charleston L, Hirman J, Cady R, Brevig T. Early response to eptinezumab indicates high likelihood of continued response in patients with chronic migraine. J Headache Pain 2022; 23:29. [PMID: 35189811 PMCID: PMC8903499 DOI: 10.1186/s10194-022-01387-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2021] [Accepted: 01/06/2022] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background A clinical ability to describe the response trajectory of patients receiving preventive migraine treatment could expedite and improve therapeutic management decisions. This post hoc analysis of the PROMISE-2 study evaluated the consistency and predictive power of Month 1 treatment response on later response in patients with chronic migraine. Methods PROMISE-2 was a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial that randomized adults with chronic migraine to eptinezumab 100 mg, 300 mg, or placebo administered IV every 12 weeks for up to 24 weeks (2 infusions over 6 study months). Migraine responder rates (MRRs) were calculated from monthly migraine days over 4-week intervals compared with baseline. Patients were grouped by MRR during Month 1 (< 25%, 25–< 50%, 50–< 75%, and ≥ 75%), with the number of subsequent study months (Months 2–6) with ≥50% and ≥ 75% MRR calculated in each subgroup. A similar analysis was conducted using Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) rating to define Month 1 subgroups (very much improved, much improved, minimally improved, and no change/worse) and rates of very much improved or much improved PGIC during Months 2–6. Results In the eptinezumab 100 mg, 300 mg, and placebo groups, respectively, 194/356 (54.5%), 212/350 (60.6%), and 132/366 (36.1%) patients were ≥ 50% migraine responders during Month 1. More eptinezumab-treated patients were ≥ 75% migraine responders (100 mg, 110/356 [30.9%]; 300 mg, 129/350 [36.9%]; placebo, 57/366 [15.6%]) and more placebo-treated patients were < 25% migraine responders (eptinezumab 100 mg, 103/356 [28.9%]; 300 mg, 80/350 [22.9%]; placebo, 153/366 [41.8%]). Among patients who achieved ≥75% migraine response in Month 1, more than one-third attained ≥75% migraine response for all 5 subsequent study months and more than two-thirds achieved ≥75% migraine response for ≥3 months. More than two-thirds of those in the very much improved (PGIC) subgroup at Month 1 were much or very much improved for all 5 subsequent months. Conclusions In this post hoc analysis of data from PROMISE-2, more eptinezumab-treated than placebo-treated patients were early (Month 1) responders, and most early responders went on to achieve a high level of response for at least half of the 24-week treatment period. Potential for later response in early non-responders was also observed. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02974153; registered November 23, 2016.
Collapse
|
25
|
McAllister P, Winner PK, Ailani J, Buse DC, Lipton RB, Chakhava G, Josiassen MK, Lindsten A, Mehta L, Ettrup A, Cady R. Eptinezumab treatment initiated during a migraine attack is associated with meaningful improvement in patient-reported outcome measures: secondary results from the randomized controlled RELIEF study. J Headache Pain 2022; 23:22. [PMID: 35130832 PMCID: PMC8903522 DOI: 10.1186/s10194-021-01376-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2021] [Accepted: 12/20/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Demonstrating therapeutic value from the patient perspective is important in patient-centered migraine management. The objective of this study was to investigate the impact of eptinezumab, a preventive migraine treatment, on patient-reported headache impact, acute medication optimization, and perception of disease change when initiated during a migraine attack.
Methods
RELIEF was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial conducted between 2019 and 2020 in adults with ≥1-year history of migraine and 4–15 migraine days per month in the 3 months prior to screening. Patients were randomized (1:1) to a 30-min infusion of eptinezumab 100 mg or placebo within 1–6 h of a qualifying migraine attack onset. The 6-item Headache Impact Test (HIT-6) and 6-item Migraine Treatment Optimization Questionnaire (mTOQ-6) were administered at baseline and week 4, and the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at week 4. A post hoc analysis of these measures was conducted in patients who reported headache pain freedom at 2 h after infusion start.
Results
Of 480 patients enrolled and treated, 476 completed the study and are included in this analysis. Mean baseline HIT-6 total scores indicated severe headache impact (eptinezumab, 65.1; placebo, 64.8). At week 4, the eptinezumab-treated group demonstrated clinically meaningful improvement in HIT-6 total score compared with placebo (mean change from baseline: eptinezumab, − 8.7; placebo, − 4.5; mean [95% CI] difference from placebo: − 4.2 [− 5.75, − 2.63], P < .0001), with greater reductions in each item score vs placebo (P < .001 all comparisons). Change in HIT-6 total score in the subgroup with 2-h headache pain freedom was − 13.8 for the eptinezumab group compared with − 4.9 for the placebo group. mTOQ-6 total score mean change from baseline favored eptinezumab (change, 2.1) compared with placebo (1.2; mean [95% CI] difference: 0.9 [0.3, 1.5], P < .01). More eptinezumab-treated patients rated PGIC as much or very much improved than placebo patients (59.3% vs 25.9%).
Conclusions
When administered during a migraine attack, eptinezumab significantly improved patient-reported outcomes after 4 weeks compared with placebo, with particularly pronounced effects in patients reporting headache pain freedom at 2 h after infusion start.
Trial registration
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04152083. November 5, 2019.
Collapse
|
26
|
Smith TR, Spierings ELH, Cady R, Hirman J, Ettrup A, Shen V. Cardiovascular outcomes in adults with migraine treated with eptinezumab for migraine prevention: pooled data from four randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies. J Headache Pain 2021; 22:143. [PMID: 34823467 PMCID: PMC8903619 DOI: 10.1186/s10194-021-01360-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2021] [Accepted: 11/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Patients with migraine have an increased relative risk of cardio- and cerebrovascular events, and some migraine treatments may exacerbate this risk. The primary objective of this analysis was to determine whether the rate of cardiovascular adverse events was higher for patients with migraine treated with the migraine-preventive eptinezumab, compared with patients receiving placebo. Methods Cardiovascular outcomes in patients with migraine were pooled across four clinical trials (phase 1b, phase 2, and two phase 3 trials) for use of eptinezumab as a preventive migraine treatment for up to 1 year. In all studies, treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) that occurred after the first dose of study treatment (eptinezumab 100 mg, 300 mg, 1000 mg, or placebo) and vital signs were recorded through study completion. Results Cardiovascular TEAEs were rare across all four clinical trials, and rates were similar between patients receiving eptinezumab and those receiving placebo. Cardiovascular TEAEs that did occur were mild or moderate in severity; there were no serious adverse events as per FDA definition. Vital signs (systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, and heart rate) were not meaningfully different across treatment groups over the course of 56 weeks, compared to placebo. Treatment with eptinezumab did not result in significant new or changed cardiovascular medications used concomitantly compared to placebo. Conclusions In this post hoc analysis of four clinical trials for eptinezumab, doses of 100 mg, 300 mg, and 1000 mg (more than 3 times the highest approved dose) were not associated with clinically relevant changes in vital signs or significant changes in concomitant cardiovascular medication usage, and had low incidences of cardiovascular TEAEs, comparable to placebo. Trial registration NCT01772524 (Study 2), 01/21/2013; NCT02275117 (Study 5), 10/27/2014; NCT02559895 (PROMISE-1), 09/25/2017; NCT02974153 (PROMISE-2), 11/28/2016 Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s10194-021-01360-1.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy R Smith
- StudyMetrix Research, 3862 Mexico Road, St. Peters, MO, 63303, USA.
| | | | | | - Joe Hirman
- Pacific Northwest Statistical Consulting, Inc., Woodinville, WA, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Morgan KW, Joyner KR. Eptinezumab: A calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibody infusion for migraine prevention. SAGE Open Med 2021; 9:20503121211050186. [PMID: 34659764 PMCID: PMC8511911 DOI: 10.1177/20503121211050186] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2021] [Accepted: 09/14/2021] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
This article seeks to analyze the clinical trials concerning the newly approved
eptinezumab to assess its efficacy, safety, and application to current clinical
practice. The Institute of Health US National Library of Medicine Clinical
Trials, PubMed, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for relevant
abstracts, journal articles, and other published sources. Search terms included
eptinezumab, Vyepti®, and ALD403. Relevant English-language articles
were evaluated and included in the narrative. Two randomized controlled trials
compared quarterly infusions of eptinezumab 100 mg, eptinezumab 300 mg, and
placebo in chronic and episodic migraine sufferers. In episodic migraine,
eptinezumab resulted in a reduction of approximately 4 monthly migraine days,
which was significant compared to placebo. In chronic migraine, eptinezumab
reduced monthly migraine days by approximately 8 days, also significant compared
to placebo. More patients who received eptinezumab experienced at least 75%
reduction in monthly migraine days compared to placebo, resulting in a number
needed to treat as low as 6, depending on the study population and the dose. The
preventive impact was noticed day one post-infusion. The most common
treatment-emergent adverse events were nausea and fatigue, and there was a low
incidence of hypersensitivity or study withdrawal. Eptinezumab is the fourth
Calcitonin Gene-related Peptide monoclonal antibody to receive Federal Drug
Administration approval. Its delivery as a quarterly infusion sets it apart from
the other agents in this class. As an infusion, eptinezumab has a quick onset of
action that may prove especially beneficial to those with severe or refractory
episodic or chronic migraines, despite the perceived increased direct and
indirect cost of an infusion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelsey Woods Morgan
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, Bernard J. Dunn School of Pharmacy, Shenandoah University, Winchester, VA, USA
| | - Kayla Rena Joyner
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, Bernard J. Dunn School of Pharmacy, Shenandoah University, Winchester, VA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Marmura MJ, Diener HC, Cowan RP, Tepper SJ, Diamond ML, Starling AJ, Hirman J, Mehta L, Brevig T, Cady R. Preventive migraine treatment with eptinezumab reduced acute headache medication and headache frequency to below diagnostic thresholds in patients with chronic migraine and medication-overuse headache. Headache 2021; 61:1421-1431. [PMID: 34551130 PMCID: PMC9291601 DOI: 10.1111/head.14206] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2021] [Revised: 06/25/2021] [Accepted: 07/12/2021] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
Objective This post hoc analysis in patients medically diagnosed with chronic migraine (CM) and medication‐overuse headache (MOH) evaluated reductions in the use of acute headache medication (AHM) and sustained changes in the diagnostic status of CM and MOH following eptinezumab treatment in the PROMISE‐2 study. Background Eptinezumab, a monoclonal antibody that inhibits calcitonin gene‐related peptide, is approved in the United States for the preventive treatment of migraine. A previous analysis showed that eptinezumab reduced monthly migraine days and was well tolerated in the subgroup of PROMISE‐2 patients diagnosed with both CM and MOH. Methods The phase 3, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled PROMISE‐2 study (NCT02974153) randomized adults with CM to eptinezumab 100 mg, 300 mg, or placebo (administered intravenously every 12 weeks for up to two doses). MOH was prospectively diagnosed at screening by trained physicians based on 3 months of medication history and International Classification of Headache Disorders‐3β criteria. This post hoc analysis evaluated changes in total and class‐specific days of AHM usage, the percentage of patients using AHM at or above MOH diagnostic thresholds, and the percentage of patients experiencing monthly headache and migraine day frequency below diagnostic thresholds for MOH and/or CM. Results In PROMISE‐2, 431/1072 (40.2%) patients with CM were diagnosed with MOH (eptinezumab 100 mg, n = 139; 300 mg, n = 147; placebo, n = 145) and were included in this analysis. Total monthly AHM use decreased from 20.6 days/month at baseline to 10.6 days/month over 24 weeks of treatment (49% decrease) with eptinezumab 100 mg, from 20.7 to 10.5 days/month (49% decrease) with eptinezumab 300 mg, and from 19.8 to 14.0 days/month (29% decrease) with placebo. Numerically greater decreases from baseline with eptinezumab were also observed for individual drug classes. In each study month, the percentages of patients who were below MOH thresholds were numerically higher for both eptinezumab doses compared with placebo, as were the percentages of patients experiencing headache and migraine frequency below CM thresholds. Of patients with available data across the entire treatment period, 29.0% (58/200) of patients treated with eptinezumab stopped meeting and remained below diagnostic thresholds for both CM and MOH during Weeks 1–24, as well as 6.3% (6/96) of patients who received placebo. Conclusions Across 24 weeks of treatment, eptinezumab reduced AHM use in patients diagnosed with CM and MOH. More than one‐fourth (29%) of patients treated with eptinezumab did not meet the diagnostic thresholds for either CM or MOH for the entire treatment period.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael J Marmura
- Department of Neurology, Jefferson Headache Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Hans-Christoph Diener
- Institute for Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, Medical Faculty, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Robert P Cowan
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University Headache and Facial Pain Program, Palo Alto, California, USA
| | - Stewart J Tepper
- Department of Neurology, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA
| | | | | | - Joe Hirman
- Pacific Northwest Statistical Consulting, Inc., Woodinville, Washington, USA
| | - Lahar Mehta
- Lundbeck Seattle BioPharmaceuticals, Inc., Bothell, Washington, USA
| | | | - Roger Cady
- Lundbeck La Jolla Research Center, San Diego, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Schwedt TJ, Lipton RB, Ailani J, Silberstein SD, Tassorelli C, Guo H, Lu K, Dabruzzo B, Miceli R, Severt L, Finnegan M, Trugman JM. Time course of efficacy of atogepant for the preventive treatment of migraine: Results from the randomized, double-blind ADVANCE trial. Cephalalgia 2021; 42:3-11. [PMID: 34521260 PMCID: PMC8739573 DOI: 10.1177/03331024211042385] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
Background Atogepant is an oral, small-molecule, calcitonin gene–related peptide receptor antagonist for the preventive treatment of migraine. Methods In the double-blind, phase 3 ADVANCE trial, participants with 4–14 migraine days/month were randomized to atogepant 10 mg, 30 mg, 60 mg, or placebo once daily for 12 weeks. We evaluated the time course of efficacy of atogepant for the preventive treatment of migraine. Analyses included change from baseline in mean monthly migraine days during each of the three 4-week treatment periods, change in weekly migraine days during weeks 1–4, and proportion of participants with a migraine on each day during the first week. Results We analyzed 873 participants (n = 214 atogepant 10 mg, n = 223 atogepant 30 mg, n = 222 atogepant 60 mg, n = 214 placebo). For weeks 1–4, mean change from baseline in mean monthly migraine days ranged from −3.1 to −3.9 across atogepant doses vs −1.6 for placebo (p < 0.0001). For weeks 5–8 and 9–12, reductions in mean monthly migraine days ranged from −3.7 to −4.2 for atogepant vs −2.9 for placebo (p ≤ 0.012) and −4.2 to −4.4 for atogepant vs −3.0 for placebo (p < 0.0002), respectively. Mean change from baseline in weekly migraine days in week 1 ranged from −0.77 to −1.03 for atogepant vs −0.29 with placebo (p < 0.0001). Percentages of participants reporting a migraine on post-dose day 1 ranged from 10.8% to 14.1% for atogepant vs 25.2% with placebo (p ≤ 0.0071). Conclusion Atogepant demonstrated treatment benefits as early as the first full day after treatment initiation, and sustained efficacy across each 4-week interval during the 12-week treatment period. Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03777059
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Jessica Ailani
- MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA
| | | | - Cristina Tassorelli
- IRCCS Mondino Foundation, Headache Science Center, Pavia, Italy.,Department of Neurology, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Hua Guo
- Neuroscience Development, AbbVie, Madison, NJ, USA
| | - Kaifeng Lu
- Neuroscience Development, AbbVie, Madison, NJ, USA
| | | | - Rosa Miceli
- Neuroscience Development, AbbVie, Madison, NJ, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Abstract
We present a review of the efficacy and safety profile of eptinezumab (also known by the brand name Vyepti), a calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) monoclonal antibody (mAb) developed by Lundbeck Seattle BioPharmaceuticals, Inc., that received its first approval in the USA on 21 February 2020 for the preventive treatment of migraine in adults. It is administered by an intravenous infusion at a 100 mg dose every 3 months and shows no drug interactions. Studies have shown that eptinezumab is an effective preventative medication in migraine which starts showing its effect from day 1 of its administration, which maintains a consistent level of efficacy through a year of its treatment at doses 100 mg and 300 mg. It was found to be effective at reducing time to headache pain freedom during acute migraine attacks as well. Eptinezumab is a relatively safe drug for the prevention of migraines with treatment-related adverse events occurring at a low frequency. They bear a safe profile in patients with comorbidities like obesity and type 1 diabetes. The most frequent adverse events observed were nasopharyngitis, upper respiratory tract infections (URTIs), and sinusitis and were usually mild. The development of anti-drug antibodies was common, but they declined to undetectable levels with continued dosing and did not appear to impact the overall safety profile of the drug. Further studies are needed to assess long-term safety, use in different patient populations, and to compare its efficacy to other drugs of its class.
Collapse
|
31
|
Winner PK, McAllister P, Chakhava G, Ailani J, Ettrup A, Krog Josiassen M, Lindsten A, Mehta L, Cady R. Effects of Intravenous Eptinezumab vs Placebo on Headache Pain and Most Bothersome Symptom When Initiated During a Migraine Attack: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 2021; 325:2348-2356. [PMID: 34128999 PMCID: PMC8207242 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2021.7665] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Intravenous eptinezumab, an anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide antibody, is approved for migraine prevention in adults. It has established onset of preventive efficacy on day 1 after infusion. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the efficacy of and adverse events related to eptinezumab when initiated during a migraine attack. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Phase 3, multicenter, parallel-group, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial conducted from November 4, 2019, to July 8, 2020, at 47 sites in the United States and the country of Georgia. Participants (aged 18-75 years) with a greater than 1-year history of migraine and migraine on 4 to 15 days per month in the 3 months prior to screening were treated during a moderate to severe migraine attack. INTERVENTIONS Eptinezumab, 100 mg (n = 238), or placebo (n = 242), administered intravenously within 1 to 6 hours of onset of a qualifying moderate to severe migraine. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Co-primary efficacy end points were time to headache pain freedom and time to absence of most bothersome symptom (nausea, photophobia, or phonophobia). Key secondary end points were headache pain freedom and absence of most bothersome symptom at 2 hours after start of infusion. Additional secondary end points were headache pain freedom and absence of most bothersome symptom at 4 hours and use of rescue medication within 24 hours. RESULTS Of 480 randomized and treated patients (mean age, 44 years; 84% female), 476 completed the study. Patients treated with eptinezumab vs placebo, respectively, achieved statistically significantly faster headache pain freedom (median, 4 hours vs 9 hours; hazard ratio, 1.54 [P < .001]) and absence of most bothersome symptom (median, 2 hours vs 3 hours; hazard ratio, 1.75 [P < .001]). At 2 hours after infusion, in the respective eptinezumab and placebo groups, headache pain freedom was achieved by 23.5% and 12.0% (between-group difference, 11.6% [95% CI, 4.78%-18.31%]; odds ratio, 2.27 [95% CI, 1.39-3.72]; P < .001) and absence of most bothersome symptom by 55.5% and 35.8% (between-group difference, 19.6% [95% CI, 10.87%-28.39%]; odds ratio, 2.25 [95% CI, 1.55-3.25]; P < .001). Results remained statistically significant at 4 hours after infusion. Statistically significantly fewer eptinezumab-treated patients used rescue medication within 24 hours than did placebo patients (31.5% vs 59.9%, respectively; between-group difference, -28.4% [95% CI, -36.95% to -19.86%]; odds ratio, 0.31 [95% CI, 0.21-0.45]; P < .001). Treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 10.9% of the eptinezumab group and 10.3% of the placebo group; the most common was hypersensitivity (eptinezumab, 2.1%; placebo, 0%). No treatment-emergent serious adverse events occurred. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Among patients eligible for preventive migraine therapy experiencing a moderate to severe migraine attack, treatment with intravenous eptinezumab vs placebo shortened time to headache and symptom resolution. Feasibility of administering eptinezumab treatment during a migraine attack and comparison with alternative treatments remain to be established. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04152083.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul K. Winner
- Palm Beach Headache Center, West Palm Beach, Florida
- Neurology Research Institute Palm Beach, West Palm Beach, Florida
- Premiere Research Institute, West Palm Beach, Florida
- Palm Beach Neurology, West Palm Beach, Florida
- Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, Florida
| | - Peter McAllister
- New England Institute for Neurology and Headache, Stamford, Connecticut
| | - George Chakhava
- D. Tvildiani Medical University, Multiprofile Clinic Consilium Medulla, Tbilisi, Georgia
| | - Jessica Ailani
- Department of Neurology, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC
| | | | | | | | - Lahar Mehta
- Lundbeck Seattle BioPharmaceuticals Inc, Bothell, Washington
| | - Roger Cady
- Lundbeck La Jolla Research Center, San Diego, California
| |
Collapse
|