1
|
Day J, Simmonds RL, Shaw L, Price CI, McClelland G, Ford GA, James M, White P, Stein K, Pope C. Healthcare professional views about a prehospital redirection pathway for stroke thrombectomy: a multiphase deductive qualitative study. Emerg Med J 2024; 41:429-435. [PMID: 38729751 DOI: 10.1136/emermed-2023-213350] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2023] [Accepted: 04/10/2024] [Indexed: 05/12/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mechanical thrombectomy for stroke is highly effective but time-critical. Delays are common because many patients require transfer between local hospitals and regional centres. A two-stage prehospital redirection pathway consisting of a simple ambulance screen followed by regional centre assessment to select patients for direct admission could optimise access. However, implementation might be challenged by the limited number of thrombectomy providers, a lack of prehospital diagnostic tests for selecting patients and whether finite resources can accommodate longer ambulance journeys plus greater central admissions. We undertook a three-phase, multiregional, qualitative study to obtain health professional views on the acceptability and feasibility of a new pathway. METHODS Online focus groups/semistructured interviews were undertaken designed to capture important contextual influences. We purposively sampled NHS staff in four regions of England. Anonymised interview transcripts underwent deductive thematic analysis guided by the NASSS (Non-adoption, Abandonment and Challenges to Scale-up, Spread and Sustainability, Implementation) Implementation Science framework. RESULTS Twenty-eight staff participated in 4 focus groups, 2 group interviews and 18 individual interviews across 4 Ambulance Trusts, 5 Hospital Trusts and 3 Integrated Stroke Delivery Networks (ISDNs). Five deductive themes were identified: (1) (suspected) stroke as a condition, (2) the pathway change, (3) the value participants placed on the proposed pathway, (4) the possible impact on NHS organisations/adopter systems and (5) the wider healthcare context. Participants perceived suspected stroke as a complex scenario. Most viewed the proposed new thrombectomy pathway as beneficial but potentially challenging to implement. Organisational concerns included staff shortages, increased workflow and bed capacity. Participants also reported wider socioeconomic issues impacting on their services contributing to concerns around the future implementation. CONCLUSIONS Positive views from health professionals were expressed about the concept of a proposed pathway while raising key content and implementation challenges and useful 'real-world' issues for consideration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jo Day
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration South West Peninsula, Health and Community Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, Devon, UK
| | | | - Lisa Shaw
- Stroke Research Group, Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Christopher I Price
- Stroke Research Group, Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Graham McClelland
- North East Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
- Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear, UK
| | - Gary A Ford
- Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust and Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Martin James
- Royal Devon University Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust and University of Exeter, University of Exeter, Exeter, Devon, UK
| | - Phil White
- Stroke Research Group, Clinical and Translational Research Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Ken Stein
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration South West Peninsula, University of Exeter, Exeter, Devon, UK
| | - Catherine Pope
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Tierney-Hendricks C, Schliep ME, Vallila-Rohter S. Barriers and facilitators to outcome measurement and treatment practices in aphasia rehabilitation in the USA: a mixed methods approach using the Theoretical Domains Framework. Disabil Rehabil 2023:1-16. [PMID: 38053357 DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2023.2288221] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2022] [Accepted: 11/22/2023] [Indexed: 12/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To identify clinician-perceived barriers and facilitators to the delivery of outcome measurement and evidence-based treatment practices and integration of these practices in aphasia rehabilitation. MATERIALS AND METHODS Using a convergent mixed methods design, aphasia clinicians (n = 87) across care settings in the United States completed an online survey designed within the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF). Participants responded to open-ended questions and rated Likert scale statements. Qualitative data were analyzed using content analysis and quantitative data were summarized using descriptive statistics. RESULTS Factors related to the TDF domain of "environmental context and resources" (priority and productivity demands; characteristics of resources) were cited as primary barriers in 70% of qualitative responses for both outcome and treatment practices and were consistent with Likert rating statements. Facilitators were associated with TDF domains of "memory, attention, decision-making" (decision-making processes), "knowledge" (awareness of evidence) and "social influences" (client and caregiver preferences). CONCLUSIONS Organizational-level factors and the misalignment of the research evidence with clinical needs are barriers to delivering evidence-based care in aphasia rehabilitation. Theoretically informed strategies such as establishing organizational infrastructure for practice change, developing clinically relevant evidence through research-practice partnerships, and implementing algorithms to support clinical decision-making can address barriers and leverage facilitators.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Megan E Schliep
- Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- MGH Institute of Health Professions, Boston, MA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Cook CV, Pompon RH. Lessons on Health Literacy and Communication in Post-Stroke Rehabilitation:: A Primer and Proposal. Dela J Public Health 2023; 9:44-49. [PMID: 37701478 PMCID: PMC10494792 DOI: 10.32481/djph.2023.08.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Health literacy, or the ability to find, understand, and use information to make well-informed health decisions, has been linked to post-stroke rehabilitation outcomes. Importantly, barriers to health literacy stem from stroke survivor characteristics, clinician practices, institutional norms, as well as systemic variables. These barriers impact recovery and rehabilitation outcomes. To address these obstacles, clinicians can learn from the evidence-based practices used by speech-language pathologists in their work with stroke survivors with aphasia, a language impairment that can follow stroke. These methods to overcome communication barriers are appropriate and recommended for patients and family members regardless of stroke impairment, and include a transdisciplinary care model, multimodal approaches to patient education, along with consistent engagement with patients and their care partners. These strategies may be adopted for both personal and organizational health literacy efforts and help optimize the rehabilitation and recovery outcomes of stroke survivors with and without aphasia.
Collapse
|
4
|
Yardley L, Morton K, Greenwell K, Stuart B, Rice C, Bradbury K, Ainsworth B, Band R, Murray E, Mair F, May C, Michie S, Richards-Hall S, Smith P, Bruton A, Raftery J, Zhu S, Thomas M, McManus RJ, Little P. Digital interventions for hypertension and asthma to support patient self-management in primary care: the DIPSS research programme including two RCTs. PROGRAMME GRANTS FOR APPLIED RESEARCH 2022. [DOI: 10.3310/bwfi7321] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Background
Digital interventions offer a potentially cost-effective means to support patient self-management in primary care, but evidence for the feasibility, acceptability and cost-effectiveness of digital interventions remains mixed. This programme focused on the potential for self-management digital interventions to improve outcomes in two common, contrasting conditions (i.e. hypertension and asthma) for which care is currently suboptimal, leading to excess deaths, illness, disability and costs for the NHS.
Objectives
The overall purpose was to address the question of how digital interventions can best provide cost-effective support for patient self-management in primary care. Our aims were to develop and trial digital interventions to support patient self-management of hypertension and asthma. Through the process of planning, developing and evaluating these interventions, we also aimed to generate a better understanding of what features and methods for implementing digital interventions could make digital interventions acceptable, feasible, effective and cost-effective to integrate into primary care.
Design
For the hypertension strand, we carried out systematic reviews of quantitative and qualitative evidence, intervention planning, development and optimisation, and an unmasked randomised controlled trial comparing digital intervention with usual care, with a health economic analysis and nested process evaluation. For the asthma strand, we carried out a systematic review of quantitative evidence, intervention planning, development and optimisation, and a feasibility randomised controlled trial comparing digital intervention with usual care, with nested process evaluation.
Setting
General practices (hypertension, n = 76; asthma, n = 7) across Wessex and Thames Valley regions in Southern England.
Participants
For the hypertension strand, people with uncontrolled hypertension taking one, two or three antihypertensive medications. For the asthma strand, adults with asthma and impaired asthma-related quality of life.
Interventions
Our hypertension intervention (i.e. HOME BP) was a digital intervention that included motivational training for patients to self-monitor blood pressure, as well as health-care professionals to support self-management; a digital interface to send monthly readings to the health-care professional and to prompt planned medication changes when patients’ readings exceeded recommended targets for 2 consecutive months; and support for optional patient healthy behaviour change (e.g. healthy diet/weight loss, increased physical activity and reduced alcohol and salt consumption). The control group were provided with a Blood Pressure UK (London, UK) leaflet for hypertension and received routine hypertension care. Our asthma intervention (i.e. My Breathing Matters) was a digital intervention to improve the functional quality of life of primary care patients with asthma by supporting illness self-management. Motivational content intended to facilitate use of pharmacological self-management strategies (e.g. medication adherence and appropriate health-care service use) and non-pharmacological self-management strategies (e.g. breathing retraining, stress reduction and healthy behaviour change). The control group were given an Asthma UK (London, UK) information booklet on asthma self-management and received routine asthma care.
Main outcome measures
The primary outcome for the hypertension randomised controlled trial was difference between intervention and usual-care groups in mean systolic blood pressure (mmHg) at 12 months, adjusted for baseline blood pressure, blood pressure target (i.e. standard, diabetic or aged > 80 years), age and general practice. The primary outcome for the asthma feasibility study was the feasibility of the trial design, including recruitment, adherence, intervention engagement and retention at follow-up. Health-care utilisation data were collected via notes review.
Review methods
The quantitative reviews included a meta-analysis. The qualitative review comprised a meta-ethnography.
Results
A total of 622 hypertensive patients were recruited to the randomised controlled trial, and 552 (89%) were followed up at 12 months. Systolic blood pressure was significantly lower in the intervention group at 12 months, with a difference of –3.4 mmHg (95% confidence interval –6.1 to –0.8 mmHg), and this gave an incremental cost per unit of systolic blood pressure reduction of £11 (95% confidence interval £5 to £29). Owing to a cost difference of £402 and a quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) difference of 0.044, long-term modelling puts the incremental cost per QALY at just over £9000. The probability of being cost-effective was 66% at willingness to pay £20,000 per quality-adjusted life-year, and this was higher at higher thresholds. A total of 88 patients were recruited to the asthma feasibility trial (target n = 80; n = 44 in each arm). At 3-month follow-up, two patients withdrew and six patients did not complete outcome measures. At 12 months, two patients withdrew and four patients did not complete outcome measures. A total of 36 out of 44 patients in the intervention group engaged with My Breathing Matters [with a median of four (range 0–25) logins].
Limitations
Although the interventions were designed to be as accessible as was feasible, most trial participants were white and participants of lower socioeconomic status were less likely to take part and complete follow-up measures. Challenges remain in terms of integrating digital interventions with clinical records.
Conclusions
A digital intervention using self-monitored blood pressure to inform medication titration led to significantly lower blood pressure in participants than usual care. The observed reduction in blood pressure would be expected to lead to a reduction of 10–15% in patients suffering a stroke. The feasibility trial of My Breathing Matters suggests that a fully powered randomised controlled trial of the intervention is warranted. The theory-, evidence- and person-based approaches to intervention development refined through this programme enabled us to identify and address important contextual barriers to and facilitators of engagement with the interventions.
Future work
This research justifies consideration of further implementation of the hypertension intervention, a fully powered randomised controlled trial of the asthma intervention and wide dissemination of our methods for intervention development. Our interventions can also be adapted for a range of other health conditions.
Trial and study registration
The trials are registered as ISRCTN13790648 (hypertension) and ISRCTN15698435 (asthma). The studies are registered as PROSPERO CRD42013004773 (hypertension review) and PROSPERO CRD42014013455 (asthma review).
Funding
This project was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Programme Grants for Applied Research programme and will be published in full in Programme Grants for Applied Research; Vol. 10, No. 11. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucy Yardley
- School of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- School of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Kate Morton
- School of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Kate Greenwell
- School of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Beth Stuart
- Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Cathy Rice
- Patient and public involvement contributor, UK
| | | | - Ben Ainsworth
- School of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Rebecca Band
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Elizabeth Murray
- Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Frances Mair
- General Practice and Primary Care, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Carl May
- Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Susan Michie
- Centre for Behaviour Change, Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK
| | | | - Peter Smith
- Department of Social Statistics and Demography, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Anne Bruton
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - James Raftery
- Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Shihua Zhu
- Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Mike Thomas
- Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Richard J McManus
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Paul Little
- Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Rai T, Hinton L, McManus RJ, Pope C. What would it take to meaningfully attend to ethnicity and race in health research? Learning from a trial intervention development study. SOCIOLOGY OF HEALTH & ILLNESS 2022; 44 Suppl 1:57-72. [PMID: 35023187 PMCID: PMC10078726 DOI: 10.1111/1467-9566.13431] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2021] [Revised: 11/12/2021] [Accepted: 11/30/2021] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
The lack of ethnic diversity in health research participation is a multi-dimensional problem. Racism and intersectional disadvantage compel us to use racial and ethnic categories to explore health, but race theorists warn that these can be essentialising and pathologising. Yet, the alternative, the pursuit of colour-blindness, can render the impact of race and ethnicity on health invisible. This paper describes the attempt to recruit an ethnically diverse sample to inform the development of an intervention for stroke patients. The study revealed deep uncertainties and tensions, which we use to re-examine our own positionalities and perspectives. We focus on the experiences of researchers and participants to show how 'usual' research practices are unwittingly exclusionary and promote 'methodological whiteness' (The British Journal of Sociology, 2017, 68, S214). Calls for greater diversity in research are frequently made, yet health research remains tainted by the use of problematic epistemological starting points, rendering participation by minoritised people uneasy. Medical sociologists, especially those engaged in clinical trials, have a vital role to play in recalibrating health research to attend to ethnicity and race. This requires us to reflect on our practices, to recognise where we are complicit in replicating social inequalities and to actively engage with communities to produce more inclusive research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tanvi Rai
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health SciencesUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK
| | - Lisa Hinton
- The Healthcare Improvement Studies InstituteUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK
| | - Richard J. McManus
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health SciencesUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK
| | - Catherine Pope
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health SciencesUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Bally ELS, Cheng D, van Grieken A, Ferri Sanz M, Zanutto O, Carroll A, Darley A, Roozenbeek B, Dippel DWJ, Raat H. Patients’ Perspectives regarding Digital Health Technology to Support Self-management and to Improve Integrated Stroke Care: Qualitative Interview Study (Preprint). J Med Internet Res 2022; 25:e42556. [PMID: 37014677 PMCID: PMC10131919 DOI: 10.2196/42556] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2022] [Revised: 12/08/2022] [Accepted: 02/27/2023] [Indexed: 03/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Digital technologies such as mobile apps and robotics have the potential to involve stroke patients better in the care process and to promote self-management. However, barriers exist that constrain the adoption and acceptance of technology in clinical practice. Examples of barriers are privacy concerns, challenges regarding usability, and the perception that there is no need for health-related technology. To address these barriers, co-design can be used to enable patients to reflect on their experiences of a service and to tailor digital technologies to the needs and preferences of end users regarding content and usability. OBJECTIVE This study aims to explore the perspectives of stroke patients toward how digital health technology could support self-management regarding health and well-being, as well as integrated stroke care. METHODS A qualitative study was conducted to understand patient perspectives. Data were collected in co-design sessions during the ValueCare study. Patients from a Dutch hospital who experienced an ischemic stroke (n=36) within the past 18 months were invited to participate. Data collection took place between December 2020 and April 2021 via one-to-one telephone interviews. A short self-report questionnaire was used to collect data on sociodemographics, disease-specific information, and technology use. All interviews were audio-taped and transcribed verbatim. The interview data were analyzed using a thematic approach. RESULTS Patients held mixed attitudes toward digital health technologies. Some patients viewed digital technology as a convenient product or service, while others expressed no desire or need to use technology for self-management or care. Digital features suggested by stroke patients included (1) information about the causes of stroke, medication, prognosis, and follow-up care; (2) an online library with information regarding stroke-related health and care issues; (3) a personal health record by which patients can retrieve and manage their own health information; and (4) online rehabilitation support to empower patients to exercise at home. Regarding the user interface of future digital health technology, patients emphasized the need for easy-to-use and simple designs. CONCLUSIONS Stroke patients mentioned credible health information, an online library with stroke-related health and care information, a personal health record, and online rehabilitation support as the main features to include in future digital health technologies. We recommend that developers and designers of digital health for stroke care listen to the "voice of the stroke patients" regarding both functionality and the characteristics of the interface. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID) RR2-10.1186/s12877-022-03333-8.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Esmee L S Bally
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Demi Cheng
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Amy van Grieken
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | | | - Oscar Zanutto
- European Project Office Department, Istituto per Servizi di Ricovero e Assistenza agli Anziani, Treviso, Italy
| | - Aine Carroll
- School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
- Academic Department, National Rehabilitation University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Andrew Darley
- School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Bob Roozenbeek
- Department of Neurology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Diederik W J Dippel
- Department of Neurology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Hein Raat
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kitt J, Frost A, Mollison J, Tucker KL, Suriano K, Kenworthy Y, McCourt A, Woodward W, Tan C, Lapidaire W, Mills R, Lacharie M, Tunnicliffe EM, Raman B, Santos M, Roman C, Hanssen H, Mackillop L, Cairns A, Thilaganathan B, Chappell L, Aye C, Lewandowski AJ, McManus RJ, Leeson P. Postpartum blood pressure self-management following hypertensive pregnancy: protocol of the Physician Optimised Post-partum Hypertension Treatment (POP-HT) trial. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e051180. [PMID: 35197335 PMCID: PMC8867381 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051180] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2021] [Accepted: 01/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION New-onset hypertension affects approximately 10% of pregnancies and is associated with a significant increase in risk of cardiovascular disease in later life, with blood pressure measured 6 weeks postpartum predictive of blood pressure 5-10 years later. A pilot trial has demonstrated that improved blood pressure control, achevied via self-management during the puerperium, was associated with lower blood pressure 3-4 years postpartum. Physician Optimised Post-partum Hypertension Treatment (POP-HT) will formally evaluate whether improved blood pressure control in the puerperium results in lower blood pressure at 6 months post partum, and improvements in cardiovascular and cerebrovascular phenotypes. METHODS AND ANALYSIS POP-HT is an open-label, parallel arm, randomised controlled trial involving 200 women aged 18 years or over, with a diagnosis of pre-eclampsia or gestational hypertension, and requiring antihypertensive medication at discharge. Women are recruited by open recruitment and direct invitation around time of delivery and randomised 1:1 to, either an intervention comprising physician-optimised self-management of postpartum blood pressure or, usual care. Women in the intervention group upload blood pressure readings to a 'smartphone' app that provides algorithm-driven individualised medication-titration. Medication changes are approved by physicians, who review blood pressure readings remotely. Women in the control arm follow assessment and medication adjustment by their usual healthcare team. The primary outcome is 24-hour average ambulatory diastolic blood pressure at 6-9 months post partum. Secondary outcomes include: additional blood pressure parameters at baseline, week 1 and week 6; multimodal cardiovascular assessments (CMR and echocardiography); parameters derived from multiorgan MRI including brain and kidneys; peripheral macrovascular and microvascular measures; angiogenic profile measures taken from blood samples and levels of endothelial circulating and cellular biomarkers; and objective physical activity monitoring and exercise assessment. An additional 20 women will be recruited after a normotensive pregnancy as a comparator group for endothelial cellular biomarkers. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION IRAS PROJECT ID 273353. This trial has received a favourable opinion from the London-Surrey Research Ethics Committee and HRA (REC Reference 19/LO/1901). The investigator will ensure that this trial is conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and follow good clinical practice guidelines. The investigators will be involved in reviewing drafts of the manuscripts, abstracts, press releases and any other publications arising from the study. Authors will acknowledge that the study was funded by the British Heart Foundation Clinical Research Training Fellowship (BHF Grant number FS/19/7/34148). Authorship will be determined in accordance with the ICMJE guidelines and other contributors will be acknowledged. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT04273854.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jamie Kitt
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Annabelle Frost
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Jill Mollison
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Katie Suriano
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Yvonne Kenworthy
- Oxford Cardiovascular Clinical Research Facility, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Annabelle McCourt
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - William Woodward
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Cheryl Tan
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Winok Lapidaire
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Rebecca Mills
- Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Miriam Lacharie
- Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Betty Raman
- Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Mauro Santos
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Cristian Roman
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Henner Hanssen
- Department of Sport, Exercise and Health, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Lucy Mackillop
- Nuffield Department of Women's and Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Alexandra Cairns
- Nuffield Department of Women's and Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Lucy Chappell
- Women's Health Academic Centre, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Christina Aye
- Nuffield Department of Women's and Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Adam J Lewandowski
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Richard J McManus
- Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Paul Leeson
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Wanat M, Santillo M, Borek AJ, Butler CC, Anthierens S, Tonkin-Crine S. OUP accepted manuscript. JAC Antimicrob Resist 2022; 4:dlac026. [PMID: 35321397 PMCID: PMC8935206 DOI: 10.1093/jacamr/dlac026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
In order to design appropriate antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) programmes, it is crucial to understand challenges to tackling antibiotic resistance (AMR) specific to each healthcare setting. Antibiotic prescribing in primary care accounts for most prescriptions with a significant proportion considered clinically inappropriate. Qualitative research has a long history in social sciences, but its value and contribution are still contested in medical journals including in the AMR/AMS field. However, through its focus on understanding, meaning making and explaining, qualitative research can offer insights in how to improve AMS efforts in primary care. This paper provides an overview of unique considerations, contributions and challenges related to using qualitative research in AMS to help the AMS community new to qualitative research to utilize its potential most fully. First, we discuss specific considerations for AMS in relation to the stages of conducting a qualitative study, including identifying a research question and choosing a suitable methodology; sampling appropriate participants; planning a recruitment strategy; choosing a method of data collection; and conducting data analysis. These are illustrated with examples of qualitative AMS studies in primary care. Second, we highlight the importance of patient and public involvement throughout all stages of the project and ensuring quality in qualitative AMS research. Finally, drawing on these considerations, we make a further case for the value and contribution of qualitative methodologies in AMS/AMR research while outlining future directions for both AMS and qualitative research, including the need for studies with diverse actors; interdisciplinary collaborations; and complex decisions on methodologies and timelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marta Wanat
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Corresponding author. E-mail: ; @SKGTonkinCrine, @BorekAleksandra, @MartaSantillo, @marta_wanat, @sibylanthierens, @ChrisColButler
| | - Marta Santillo
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Aleksandra J. Borek
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Christopher C. Butler
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Sibyl Anthierens
- Department of Family Medicine and Population Health, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Sarah Tonkin-Crine
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit in Healthcare Associated Infections and Antimicrobial Resistance, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Morton K, Ainsworth B, Miller S, Rice C, Bostock J, Denison-Day J, Towler L, Groot J, Moore M, Willcox M, Chadborn T, Amlot R, Gold N, Little P, Yardley L. Adapting Behavioral Interventions for a Changing Public Health Context: A Worked Example of Implementing a Digital Intervention During a Global Pandemic Using Rapid Optimisation Methods. Front Public Health 2021; 9:668197. [PMID: 33981669 PMCID: PMC8109268 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.668197] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2021] [Accepted: 03/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: A rigorous approach is needed to inform rapid adaptation and optimisation of behavioral interventions in evolving public health contexts, such as the Covid-19 pandemic. This helps ensure that interventions are relevant, persuasive, and feasible while remaining evidence-based. This paper provides a set of iterative methods to rapidly adapt and optimize an intervention during implementation. These methods are demonstrated through the example of optimizing an effective online handwashing intervention called Germ Defense. Methods: Three revised versions of the intervention were rapidly optimized and launched within short timeframes of 1-2 months. Optimisations were informed by: regular stakeholder engagement; emerging scientific evidence, and changing government guidance; rapid qualitative research (telephone think-aloud interviews and open-text surveys), and analyses of usage data. All feedback was rapidly collated, using the Table of Changes method from the Person-Based Approach to prioritize potential optimisations in terms of their likely impact on behavior change. Written feedback from stakeholders on each new iteration of the intervention also informed specific optimisations of the content. Results: Working closely with clinical stakeholders ensured that the intervention was clinically accurate, for example, confirming that information about transmission and exposure was consistent with evidence. Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) contributors identified important clarifications to intervention content, such as whether Covid-19 can be transmitted via air as well as surfaces, and ensured that information about difficult behaviors (such as self-isolation) was supportive and feasible. Iterative updates were made in line with emerging evidence, including changes to the information about face-coverings and opening windows. Qualitative research provided insights into barriers to engaging with the intervention and target behaviors, with open-text surveys providing a useful supplement to detailed think-aloud interviews. Usage data helped identify common points of disengagement, which guided decisions about optimisations. The Table of Changes was modified to facilitate rapid collation and prioritization of multiple sources of feedback to inform optimisations. Engagement with PPI informed the optimisation process. Conclusions: Rapid optimisation methods of this kind may in future be used to help improve the speed and efficiency of adaptation, optimization, and implementation of interventions, in line with calls for more rapid, pragmatic health research methods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine Morton
- School of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Ben Ainsworth
- Department of Psychology, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom
- NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Sascha Miller
- School of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Cathy Rice
- Public Contributor, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Jennifer Bostock
- Public Contributor, London, United Kingdom
- Quality Safety & Outcomes Policy Research Unit, University of Kent & Oxford, Kent, United Kingdom
| | - James Denison-Day
- School of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Lauren Towler
- School of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Julia Groot
- Department of Psychology, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom
| | - Michael Moore
- Primary Care Population Sciences and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Merlin Willcox
- Primary Care Population Sciences and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Tim Chadborn
- Public Health England Behavioural Insights, Public Health England, London, United Kingdom
| | - Richard Amlot
- Behavioural Science Team, Emergency Response Department Science and Technology, Public Health England, London, United Kingdom
| | - Natalie Gold
- Public Health England Behavioural Insights, Public Health England, London, United Kingdom
| | - Paul Little
- Primary Care Population Sciences and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Lucy Yardley
- School of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
- School of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Rai T, Morton K, Roman C, Doogue R, Rice C, Williams M, Schwartz C, Velardo C, Tarassenko L, Yardley L, McManus RJ, Hinton L. Optimizing a digital intervention for managing blood pressure in stroke patients using a diverse sample: Integrating the person-based approach and patient and public involvement. Health Expect 2020; 24:327-340. [PMID: 33316120 PMCID: PMC8077154 DOI: 10.1111/hex.13173] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2020] [Revised: 11/10/2020] [Accepted: 11/12/2020] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Having a stroke or transient ischaemic attack increases the risk of a subsequent one, especially with high blood pressure (BP). Home‐based BP management can be effective at maintaining optimal BP. Objective To describe the optimization of a digital intervention for stroke patients and the value of participant diversity, using the person‐based approach (PBA) and integral patient and public involvement (PPI). Setting and participants Stroke patients recruited from primary care and community settings, and health‐care professionals in primary care, in England and Ireland. Design Three linked qualitative studies conducted iteratively to develop an intervention using the PBA, with integral PPI. Intervention The BP: Together intervention, adapted from existing BP self‐monitoring interventions, is delivered via mobile phone or web interface to support self‐monitoring of BP at home. It alerts patients and their clinicians when a change in antihypertensive medication is needed. Findings Feedback from a diverse range of participants identified potential barriers, which were addressed to improve the intervention accessibility, feasibility and persuasiveness. Easy‐to‐read materials were developed to improve usability for patients with aphasia and lower literacy. The importance of including family members who support patient care was also highlighted. Feedback messages regarding medication change were refined to ensure usefulness for patients and clinicians. Discussion Input from PPI alongside qualitative research with a diverse study sample allowed the creation of a simple and equitable BP management intervention for stroke patients. Patient involvement Two PPI co‐investigators contributed to design, conduct of study, data interpretation and manuscript preparation; community PPI sessions informed early planning. Study participants were stroke patients and family members.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tanvi Rai
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Kate Morton
- School of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Cristian Roman
- Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, UK
| | - Roisin Doogue
- Graduate Entry Medical School, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| | - Cathy Rice
- Public and Patient Involvement (PPI) Contributor, Bristol, UK
| | - Marney Williams
- Public and Patient Involvement (PPI) Contributor, Bristol, UK
| | - Claire Schwartz
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | | | - Lucy Yardley
- School of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.,Department of Experimental Psychology, Institute of Biomedical Engineering, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Richard J McManus
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Lisa Hinton
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.,The Healthcare Improvement Studies Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|