Liposarcomatous differentiation in malignant phyllodes tumours is unassociated withMDM2orCDK4amplification

Malignant phyllodes tumor and invasive lobular breast carcinoma: Morpho-molecular characterization of an uncommon collision tumor and review of the literature

Phyllodes tumor (PT) of the breast is a biphasic neoplasia composed of mesenchymal and epithelial cells. PTs are graded as benign, borderline or malignant according to histological criteria. Invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) is a special breast cancer subtype defined by non-cohesive growth and loss of E-cadherin. PT is treated by resection. ILC is treated by resection and adjuvant endocrine therapy with or without chemotherapy. Collision tumors composed of PT and concurrent ILC are rare. Due to their dissociated growth, ILC cells may escape histologic detection when admixed with PTs. Here we report the case of a 71-years-old female diagnosed with a PT/ILC collision tumor. The patient presented with a tumor in the right breast. A core needle biopsy showed mesenchymal spindle cell proliferates suspicious for a PT. The resection specimen confirmed a malignant PT with stromal overgrowth. Unexpectedly, the resection specimen also revealed sparse infiltrates of ILC admixed with the PT. Immunohistochemistry of mesenchymal PT cells and ILC cells was consistent with the histomorphological diagnosis. Molecular analyses demonstrated a IDH1 variant of unknown significance and GNAS gene mutation in microdissected PT tissue. ILC tissue showed wild-type IDH1 and GNAS, but harbored CDH1/E-cadherin and TP53 gene mutations, arguing against clonal relatedness of the two lesions. Review of the literature identified six reported PT/ILC collision tumors, involving three benign, two borderline and one malignant PT. In summary, this is the second report on a malignant PT/ILC collision tumor. Correct histologic diagnosis of PT/ILC collision tumors is clinically relevant, because adjuvant endocrine therapy is mandatory for ILC.

Comprehensive Clinical-Pathologic Assessment of Malignant Phyllodes Tumors: Proposing Refined Diagnostic Criteria

The latest World Health Organization classification of breast tumors recommends diagnosing malignant phyllodes tumors (MPTs) when all 5 morphologic features are present: permeative borders, marked stromal cellularity, marked stromal cytologic atypia, ≥10 mitoses per 10 high-power fields (HPF), and stromal overgrowth. We assessed the performance of this recommendation to capture MPTs and features predictive of distant metastasis in a multi-institutional retrospective study. Of 65 MPTs, most cases had at least focally permeative borders (58, 89%), with marked stromal cellularity in 40 (61.5%), marked atypia in 38 (58.5%), ≥10 mitoses per 10 HPF in 50 (77%), and stromal overgrowth in 56 (86%). Distant metastases were observed in 20 (31%) patients (median follow-up 24.5 mo, 1 to 204). Only 13 of 65 (20%) cases had all 5 morphologic features, while only 7 of 20 (35%) cases with distant metastases had all 5 features. In univariate analysis, only marked stromal atypia ( P =0.004) and cellularity ( P =0.017) were associated with decreased distant metastasis-free survival. In multivariate Cox regression, the combination of stromal overgrowth, marked stromal cellularity, and atypia (C-index 0.721, 95% CI: 0.578, 0.863) was associated with decreased distant metastasis-free survival. The current World Health Organization recommendation will miss a significant number of MPTs with distant metastases. We propose refined diagnostic criteria for MPTs: (1) stromal overgrowth combined with ≥1 feature(s) (marked cellularity, marked atypia, or ≥10 mitoses per 10 HPF), or (2) in the absence of stromal overgrowth, marked cellularity combined with ≥1 feature(s) (permeative borders, marked atypia, or ≥10 mitoses per 10 HPF).

Refining the classification of breast phyllodes tumours

Phyllodes tumours of the breast are uncommon fibroepithelial neoplasms that pose recurrent classification challenges, in large part due to the multiple histological parameters of stromal hypercellularity and atypia, stromal mitotic count, stromal overgrowth and tumour borders, that are used for grading. While the World Health Organization (WHO) Classification of Breast Tumours provides recommendations on diagnostic features, defining criteria are not always applied in routine practice. Lack of concordance among pathologists in typing and grading further underscores the classification difficulties, especially in the borderline category. Although there has been significant molecular information on phyllodes tumours in recent years which has been diagnostically helpful, it has not been translated into daily clinical practice. In order to refine the classification of phyllodes tumours into one that is simple yet comprehensive, reproducible and prognostically precise, a multipronged approach is needed that leverages on global contributions of the International Fibroepithelial Consortium, support by the International Collaboration on Cancer Classification and Research (IC³ R) in amalgamating evidence translation, and guidance from the International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting (ICCR) for standardised reporting. It is hoped that the evidence generated can be used towards refining the classification of phyllodes tumours for the future.

FISH Diagnostic Assessment of MDM2 Amplification in Liposarcoma: Potential Pitfalls and Troubleshooting Recommendations

MDM2 amplification represents the leading oncogenic pathway and diagnostic hallmark of liposarcoma, whose assessment is based on Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH) analysis. Despite its diagnostic relevance, no univocal interpretation criteria regarding FISH assessments of MDM2 amplification have been established so far, leading to several different approaches and potential diagnostic misinterpretations. This study aims to address the most common issues and proposes troubleshooting guidelines for MDM2 amplification assessments by FISH. We retrospectively retrieved 51 liposarcomas, 25 Lipomas, 5 Spindle Cell Lipoma/Pleomorphic Lipomas, and 2 Atypical Spindle Cell Lipomatous Tumors and the corresponding MDM2 FISH analysis. We observed MDM2 amplification in liposarcomas cases only (43 out of 51 cases) and identified three MDM2-amplified patterns (scattered (50% of cases), clustered (14% of cases), and mixed (36% of cases)) and two nonamplified patterns (low number of signals (82% of cases) and polysomic (18% of cases)). Based on these data and published evidence in the literature, we propose a set of criteria to guide MDM2 amplification analysis in liposarcoma. Kindled by the compelling importance of MDM2 assessments to improve diagnostic and therapeutic liposarcoma management, these suggestions could represent the first step to develop a univocal interpretation model and consensus guidelines.

Mesenchymal lesions of the breast

Mesenchymal lesions of the breast are a heterogeneous range of entities with diverse clinical, histological, and molecular features, as well as biological behaviour. Their morphologic overlap with non-mesenchymal lesions (such as metaplastic carcinoma and phyllodes tumour) and relative rarity also pose significant diagnostic challenges. In this review, we summarize the salient features of selected mesenchymal lesions of the breast, emphasizing those that are the most common and problematic. Vascular, fibroblastic/myofibroblastic, adipocytic, and smooth muscle lesions are each covered with regard to their clinicopathological features and differential diagnosis, while recent advances and the role of immunohistochemistry and molecular tests are also highlighted.

Fibroepithelial Lesions of the Breast: Update on Molecular Profile With Focus on Pediatric Population

CONTEXT.—

This review article derives from the breast pathology lecture at the Eighth Princeton Integrated Pathology Symposium (PIPS VIII).

OBJECTIVE.—

To provide a literature review and update on fibroepithelial lesions of the breast with molecular findings and findings regarding the pediatric population.

DATA SOURCES.—

The sources include extensive literature review, personal research, and experience.

CONCLUSIONS.—

Given significant differences in prognosis and management of fibroepithelial lesions, we aim to provide readers with pertinent definitions, pathomorphology, molecular findings, and management for each diagnosis, with insights on the pediatric population.

Survey of recurrent diagnostic challenges in breast phyllodes tumours

BACKGROUND

Breast phyllodes tumours (PTs) are graded as benign, borderline, or malignant by analysis of multiple histological features. PT grading is often inconsistent, likely due to variation in the weighting of grading criteria by pathologists.

DESIGN

The hierarchy of use of diagnostic criteria was identified using a 20-question survey.

RESULTS

In all, 213 pathologists from 29 countries responded. 54% reported 10-50 PT cases per year. Criteria considered key to PT diagnosis were: increased stromal cellularity (84.3%), stromal overgrowth (76.6%), increased stromal mitoses (67.8%), stromal atypia (61.5%), stromal fronding (59.0%), periductal stromal condensation (58.0%), irregular tumour borders (46.3%), and/or lesional heterogeneity (33.7%). The importance of grading parameters were: mitotic activity (55.5%), stromal overgrowth (54.0%), stromal atypia (51.9%), increased stromal cellularity (41.7%), and nature of the tumour border (38.9%). 49% would diagnose malignant PT without a full array of adverse features. 89% used the term "cellular fibroepithelial lesion (FEL)" for difficult cases; 45% would diagnose an FEL with stromal fronding (but lacking other PT features) as fibroadenoma (FA), 35% FEL, and 17% PT. 59% deemed clinico-radiological findings diagnostically significant; 68% considered age (≥40 years) important in determining if an FEL was a FA or PT. In FELs from young patients, increased stromal cellularity (83%), fronding (52%), and mitoses (41%) were more common. 34% regarded differentiating cellular FA from PT as a specific challenge; 54% had issues assigning a borderline PT grade.

CONCLUSION

Criteria for grading PT lie on a spectrum, leading to interpretive variability. The survey highlights the criteria most used by pathologists, which do not completely align with WHO recommendations.

Re-Classification with Outcome Correlation of Previously Diagnosed Malignant Phyllodes Tumors Applying the 2016 Consensus Guidelines

Background. Classification of phyllodes tumors is challenging due unclear diagnostic criteria, recently addressed by consensus review criteria. Herein, we reviewed all malignant phyllodes tumor resections and reclassified them based on the consensus guidelines, correlating with outcome. We hypothesize that application of criteria would result in a significant proportion being "down-graded" to either borderline or benign phyllodes tumor. Methods. Primary resections of malignant phyllodes tumor were reviewed by four AP board-certified, breast fellowship-trained pathologists. Morphologic variables delineated in consensus guidelines (ie stromal cellularity, cellular atypia, tumor border, presence of heterologous elements, presence of stromal overgrowth) were evaluated. Following review, cases were reclassified as benign, borderline, or malignant. Results. Upon reclassification, 20% (5/20) cases were "down-graded" to borderline phyllodes tumor while 80% (15/20) remained malignant phyllodes tumor. Two morphologic features were statistically significant including broadly infiltrating tumor border in 80% (12/15) of malignant phyllodes tumors compared to none in borderline phyllodes tumor (0/5) (p = 0.004) and stromal overgrowth in 67% (10/15) of malignant phyllodes tumor compared to none in borderline phyllodes tumors (0/5) (p = 0.03). Upon review of the pathology reports, 30% (6/20) contained all 5 histomorphologic variables delineated in the consensus review criteria. Malignant phyllodes tumor resulted in five cases with recurrence (33.3%, 5/15) and three cases with metastases (20.0%, 3/15) and borderline phyllodes tumor resulted in one case with recurrence (20.0%, 1/5) and no metastases (0/5). Conclusion. The consensus guidelines for phyllodes tumor are useful for subclassification. We hypothesize that standardize reporting of the histomorphologic variables may lead to better consensus.

Case Report: Giant Cell Tumor of Tendon Sheath After Breast Augmentation

Giant cell tumor of tendon sheath (GCTTS) is a benign tumor. It occurs predominantly in the hands, ankles, and knees. A 39-year-old female presented with GCTTS in the right breast after breast augmentation. There was a clear borderline between the tumor and breast tissue. In terms of morphological appearance, synovial metaplasia could be observed in part of the collagenous capsule. The tumor was moderately cellular and was composed of synovium-like monocytes. The main part of the tumor was blended with nested and scattered xanthomatous cells, lymphocytes, and osteoclast-like giant cells. Hemosiderin granules were distributed in the lesion. Immunohistochemical staining and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analyses were performed. CD68 staining was positive in osteoclast-like giant cells. In addition, neither significant USP6 translocation nor CSF1 translocation was detected by FISH. We hypothesized that the pathogenesis of this rare GCT-TS was based on synovial metaplasia and did not depend on the translocation of classical CSF1.

Diagnostic concordance of phyllodes tumour of the breast

AIMS

Phyllodes tumours (PT) are rare and distinct breast tumours, which span a morphological continuum. Classification into benign, borderline and malignant categories reflects their biology and clinical behaviour and is essential to guide management. This study aims to assess the diagnostic agreement of PT using the UK National Health Service Breast Screening Programme (NHSBSP) breast pathology external quality assurance (EQA) scheme data.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Twenty-six PTs were identified in the EQA scheme, which were diagnosed by an average of 607 participants/circulation. Data on diagnostic categories were collected and representative slides were reviewed. The level of concordance between reporting pathologists was assessed. There were 14 benign, six borderline and six malignant PT. The overall rate of diagnosis agreement was 86% when analysed as benign lesions, borderline PT and malignant lesions, which decreased to 79% when diagnosed as PT (irrespective of grade) and to 63% when the diagnosis was further refined to PT categories (benign, borderline and malignant PTs). The highest agreement rate was observed in malignant PT (86%) and the lowest in borderline PT (42%). Malignant heterologous elements, stromal overgrowth and leaf-like architecture are features associated with higher concordance rates. Lower-priority features were stromal expansion, clefting and multinodularity.

CONCLUSION

The concordance of PT diagnosis, as an entity, is high, but its classification into benign, borderline and malignant has variable agreement levels, with borderline tumours having the lowest concordance rate. More research to refine the diagnostic criteria for categorisation of PT is warranted to improve concordance between pathologists.

A Case of Phyllodes Tumor of the Breast with Mixed Liposarcoma: Case Report and Literature Review

Phyllodes tumors (PTs) account for less than 1% of breast tumors, and malignant PTs account for even less. Here, we described an unusual case of malignant PT with mixed liposarcoma (myxoid liposarcoma [MLP] and pleomorphic liposarcoma [PLP]). A 52-year-old woman discovered a small lump in her left breast. Twenty years later, the lump suddenly grew within 1 month. Mammography showed space-occupying lesions of the left breast. Histologically, the tumor was characterized by hypercellular stroma covering the epithelium and protrusion of the myoepithelium into the cyst to form a lobulated structure; regions of loose mucus and hypercellular structures alternated. A region of peripheral benign fibroadenoma was also observed, and many stellate and spindle cells or signet ring-like cells were identified in loose areas. Some areas showed a characteristic thin branching vascular pattern. In the cell-rich area, adipocytes and odd megakaryocytes were observed. Atypical mitotic figures were observed in the cell-rich and mucus areas (16 mitoses/10 high-power fields [HPF] and 2 mitoses/10 HPF, respectively). In the immunohistochemical analysis, a small number of tumor cells were positive for AE1/3 and vimentin, whereas all cells were negative for cytokeratin 34βE12, E-cadherin, p63, estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, and S-100, ruling out the possibility of metaplastic carcinoma. Interestingly, cyclin-dependent kinase 4, mouse double minute 2 (MDM2), and p16 were strongly positive in both loose mucus and cell-rich areas. However, the fluorescence in situ hybridization test results showed that MDM2 was not amplified. Combined with morphological characteristics, these findings supported that the tumor was a mixed malignant PT with MLP and PLP. Our patient did not receive radiation therapy, and after 47 months of follow-up, no recurrence or metastasis occurred. This case report serves to expand the morphologic spectrum of mixed malignant PT with liposarcoma.

Fibroepithelial lesions revisited: implications for diagnosis and management

Fibroepithelial lesions of the breast, comprising the fibroadenoma and phyllodes tumour, are a unique group of neoplasms that share histological characteristics but possess different clinical behaviour. The fibroadenoma is the commonest benign breast tumour in women, while the phyllodes tumour is rare and may be associated with recurrences, grade progression and even metastasis. The diagnosis of fibroadenoma is usually straightforward, with recognised histological variants such as the cellular, complex, juvenile and myxoid forms. The phyllodes tumour comprises benign, borderline and malignant varieties, graded using a constellation of histological parameters based on stromal characteristics of hypercellularity, atypia, mitoses, overgrowth and the nature of tumour borders. While phyllodes tumour grade correlates with clinical behaviour, interobserver variability in assessing multiple parameters that are potentially of different biological weightage leads to significant challenges in accurate grade determination and consequently therapy. Differential diagnostic considerations along the spectrum of fibroepithelial tumours can be problematic in routine practice. Recent discoveries of the molecular underpinnings of these tumours may have diagnostic, prognostic and therapeutic implications.

Molecular updates in adipocytic neoplasms✰

Adipocytic neoplasms include a diversity of both benign tumors (lipomas) and malignancies (liposarcomas), and each tumor type is characterized by its own unique molecular alterations driving tumorigenesis. Work over the past 30 years has established the diagnostic utility of several of these characteristic molecular alterations (e.g. MDM2 amplification in well- and dedifferentiated liposarcoma, FUS/EWSR1-DDIT3 gene fusions in myxoid liposarcoma, RB1 loss in spindle cell/pleomorphic lipoma). More recent studies have focused on additional molecular alterations which may have therapeutic or prognostic impact. This review will summarize several of the important molecular findings in adipocytic tumors that have been described over the past 10 years.

Primary Breast Atypical Lipomatous Tumor/ Well-Differentiated Liposarcoma and Dedifferentiated Liposarcoma

Atypical lipomatous tumor/well-differentiated liposarcoma (ALT/WDL) and its higher-grade counterpart, dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DDL), are extraordinarily rare tumors in the breast. The main differential diagnostic consideration of primary breast ALT/WDL is malignant phyllodes tumor with liposarcomatous differentiation, and the main differential diagnostic consideration of DDL in the breast is metaplastic breast carcinoma, particularly the spindle cell type, with heterologous sarcomatous differentiation. These differential diagnoses may be particularly challenging when evaluating limited core needle biopsy sampling. MDM2 and/or CDK4 protein overexpression and gene amplification are beneficial ancillary studies that can help establish the diagnosis of primary breast ALT/WDL and DDL, and effectively rule out the diagnoses of malignant phyllodes tumor and metaplastic breast carcinoma.

Prevalence of MDM2 amplification and coalterations in 523 advanced cancer patients in the MD Anderson phase 1 clinic

Background

TP53 is the most commonly mutated gene in cancer and codes for the best studied tumor suppressor, p53. MDM2 is involved in the negative regulation of p53 and itself serves as an oncogene, reported to be overexpressed in several cancer tumor types. In this retrospective study, we assessed the occurrence of MDM2 amplification among patients with various types of cancers and its association with clinical factors, other genetic aberrations, and response to targeted therapy in a phase I clinical trial setting.

Methods

Samples from patients with advanced solid tumors who had been referred to the MD Anderson phase I clinical trials program between January 2011 and January 2016 were collected and analyzed for MDM2 amplification using FoundationOne's genomic profiling assay. Patients whose tumors expressed MDM2 amplification were compared to those with tumors of the same histologic types without MDM2 amplification.

Results

We tested tumors from 523 patients, of which 23 (4.4%) had MDM2 amplification. The highest prevalence of MDM2 amplification was in sarcoma (57%), breast cancer (13%) and bladder cancer (9%). Six patients with liposarcoma were treated on phase I protocol with an MDM2 inhibitor. The most common molecular aberrations co-occurring with MDM2 amplification was CDK4 amplification (70%). TP53 mutation was also detected in 7 patients (30%).

Conclusion

MDM2 amplification was most commonly associated with liposarcoma. Concomitant alterations in additional genes such as CDK4 amplification and TP53 mutations, along with variable responses to targeted therapies including MDM2 inhibitors, suggest that further combinational studies are needed to target this population.

Lipomatous tumors of the breast: A contemporary review

Breast tumors with lipomatous or liposarcomatous components are infrequently encountered, but can be a source of diagnostic difficulty if the context of the fatty differentiation is not recognized. Among the true adipocytic tumors, lipoma is the most common lipomatous tumor arising in the breast. Several mammary spindle cell tumors may show adipocytic differentiation, including fibroepithelial tumors and myofibroblastoma. Liposarcomatous components most often arise in malignant phyllodes tumors, as opposed to primary liposarcomas of the breast which are believed to be uncommon. This article will review the spectrum fat-containing tumors of the breast with an emphasis on differential diagnosis and insights from recent molecular studies.

Fibroepithelial lesions; The WHO spectrum

Fibroepithelial lesions of the breast comprise a morphologically and biologically heterogeneous group of biphasic tumors with epithelial and stromal components that demonstrate widely variable clinical behavior. Fibroadenomas are common benign tumors with a number of histologic variants, most of which pose no diagnostic challenge. Cellular and juvenile fibroadenomas can have overlapping features with phyllodes tumors and should be recognized. Phyllodes tumors constitute a spectrum of lesions with varying clinical behavior and are graded as benign, borderline or malignant based on a set of histologic features according to recommendations by the World Health Organization (WHO). Recent developments have significantly expanded our understanding of the pathogenesis of fibroepithelial lesions, highlighting fibroadenomas as true neoplasms and underscoring a commonality with phyllodes tumors in the form of recurrent MED12 exon 2 mutations. In addition, sequencing studies have elucidated pathways associated with phyllodes tumor progression. Accurate diagnosis and grading of phyllodes tumors are important for patient management and prognosis, as grade broadly correlates with increasing local recurrence risk, and essentially only malignant tumors metastasize. However, classification of fibroepithelial lesions in many cases remains challenging on both core biopsy and excision specimens. A commonly encountered problem at the benign end of the spectrum is the distinction of benign phyllodes tumor from cellular fibroadenoma, which is largely due to the subjective nature of histologic features used in diagnosis and histologic overlap between lesions. Grading is further complicated by the requirement to integrate multiple subjective and ill-defined parameters. On the opposite end of the histologic spectrum, malignant phyllodes tumors must be distinguished from more common metaplastic carcinomas and from primary or metastatic sarcomas, which can be especially difficult in core biopsies. Immunohistochemistry can be useful in the differential diagnosis but should be interpreted with attention to caveats. This review provides an overview and update on the spectrum of fibroepithelial lesions, with special emphasis on common problems and practical issues in diagnosis.

Genetic analysis of uterine adenosarcomas and phyllodes tumors of the breast

Uterine adenosarcomas and breast phyllodes tumors (PTs) are morphologically similar, being composed of stromal projections in a leaf-like fashion lined by epithelial cells. Here, we investigated whether their histologic similarities would be mirrored at the genetic level. The previously reported repertoires of somatic genetic alterations found in 19 adenosarcomas and 22 PTs (six benign, six borderline, and 10 malignant) were compared. PTs significantly more frequently displayed mutations affecting MED12, the TERT gene promoter and bona fide cancer genes, whereas adenosarcomas harbored a higher rate of MDM2/CDK4 and TERT gene amplifications. Pathway analyses based on the genes affected by somatic genetic alterations in these tumors indicated that Wnt signaling likely plays a role in the biology of adenosarcomas and benign/borderline PTs. In conclusion, despite the differences at the gene level, PTs and adenosarcomas share remarkable morphologic similarities and enrichment for somatic genetic alterations affecting Wnt pathway-related genes.

Genomic profiling of malignant phyllodes tumors reveals aberrations in FGFR1 and PI-3 kinase/RAS signaling pathways and provides insights into intratumoral heterogeneity

Malignant phyllodes tumors of the breast are poorly understood rare neoplasms with potential for aggressive behavior. Few efficacious treatment options exist for progressed or metastatic disease. The molecular features of malignant phyllodes tumors are poorly defined, and a deeper understanding of the genetics of these tumors may shed light on pathogenesis and progression and potentially identify novel treatment approaches. We sequenced 510 cancer-related genes in 10 malignant phyllodes tumors, including 5 tumors with liposarcomatous differentiation and 1 with myxoid chondrosarcoma-like differentiation. Intratumoral heterogeneity was assessed by sequencing two separate areas in 7 tumors, including non-heterologous and heterologous components of tumors with heterologous differentiation. Activating hotspot mutations in FGFR1 were identified in 2 tumors. Additional recurrently mutated genes included TERT promoter (6/10), TP53 (4/10), PIK3CA (3/10), MED12 (3/10), SETD2 (2/10) and KMT2D (2/10). Together, genomic aberrations in FGFR/EGFR PI-3 kinase and RAS pathways were identified in 8 (80%) tumors and included mutually exclusive and potentially actionable activating FGFR1, PIK3CA and BRAF V600E mutations, inactivating TSC2 mutation, EGFR amplification and PTEN loss. Seven (70%) malignant phyllodes tumors harbored TERT aberrations (six promoter mutations, one amplification). For comparison, TERT promoter mutations were identified by Sanger sequencing in 33% borderline (n=12) and no (0%, n=8) benign phyllodes tumors (P=0.391 and P=0.013 vs malignant tumors, respectively). Genetic features specific to liposarcoma, including CDK4/MDM2 amplification, were not identified. Copy number analysis revealed intratumoral heterogeneity and evidence for divergent tumor evolution in malignant phyllodes tumors with and without heterologous differentiation. Tumors with liposarcomatous differentiation revealed more chromosomal aberrations in non-heterologous components compared with liposarcomatous components. EGFR amplification was heterogeneous and present only in the non-heterologous component of one tumor with liposarcomatous differentiation. The results identify novel pathways involved in the pathogenesis of malignant phyllodes tumors, which significantly increase our understanding of tumor biology and have potential clinical impact.