Update on triple-negative breast cancers - highlighting subtyping update and treatment implication

Advancements in triple-negative breast cancer sub-typing, diagnosis and treatment with assistance of artificial intelligence : a focused review

Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is most aggressive type of breast cancer with multiple invasive sub-types and leading cause of women's death worldwide. Lack of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2) causes it to spread rapidly making its treatment challenging due to unresponsiveness towards anti-HER and endocrine therapy. Hence, needing advanced therapeutic treatments and strategies in order to get better recovery from TNBC. Artificial intelligence (AI) has been emerged by giving its high inputs in the automated diagnosis as well as treatment of several diseases, particularly TNBC. AI based TNBC molecular sub-typing, diagnosis as well as therapeutic treatment has become successful now days. Therefore, present review has reviewed recent advancements in the role and assistance of AI particularly focusing on molecular sub-typing, diagnosis as well as treatment of TNBC. Meanwhile, advantages, certain limitations and future implications of AI assistance in the TNBC diagnosis and treatment are also discussed in order to fully understand readers regarding this issue.

Genomic characterization reveals distinct mutational landscapes and therapeutic implications between different molecular subtypes of triple-negative breast cancer

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) has high heterogeneity, poor prognosis, and limited treatment success. Recently, an immunohistochemistry-based surrogate classification for the "Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center (FUSCC) subtyping" has been developed and is considered more suitable for clinical application. Seventy-one paraffin-embedded sections of surgically resected TNBC were classified into four molecular subtypes using the IHC-based surrogate classification. Genomic analysis was performed by targeted next-generation sequencing and the specificity of the subtypes was explored by bioinformatics, including survival analysis, multivariate Cox regression, pathway enrichment, Pyclone analysis, mutational signature analysis and PHIAL analysis. AKT1 and BRCA1 mutations were identified as independent prognostic factors in TNBC. TNBC molecular subtypes encompass distinct genomic landscapes that show specific heterogeneities. The luminal androgen receptor (LAR) subtype was associated with mutations in PIK3CA and PI3K pathways, which are potentially sensitive to PI3K pathway inhibitors. The basal-like immune-suppressed (BLIS) subtype was characterized by high genomic instability and the specific possession of signature 19 while patients in the immunomodulatory (IM) subtype belonged to the PD-L1 ≥ 1% subgroup with enrichment in Notch signaling, suggesting a possible benefit of immune checkpoint inhibitors and Notch inhibitors. Moreover, mesenchymal-like (MES) tumors displayed enrichment in the receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK)-RAS pathway and potential sensitivity to RTK pathway inhibitors. The findings suggest potential treatment targets and prognostic factors, indicating the possibility of TNBC stratified therapy in the future.

Subtyping of triple-negative breast cancers: its prognostication and implications in diagnosis of breast origin

BACKGROUND

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) subtyping by gene profiling has provided valuable clinical information. Here, we aimed to evaluate the relevance of TNBC subtyping using immunohistochemistry (IHC), which could be a more clinically practical approach, for prognostication and applications in patient management.

METHODS

A total of 123 TNBC cases were classified using androgen receptor (AR), CD8, Forkhead box C1 protein (FOXC1), and doublecortin-like kinase 1 (DCLK1) into luminal androgen receptor (LAR), basal-like immunosuppressive (BLIS), mesenchymal-like (MES), and immunomodulatory (IM) subtypes. The IM cases were further divided into the IM-excluded and IM-inflamed categories by CD8 spatial distribution. Their clinicopathological and biomarker profiles and prognoses were evaluated.

RESULTS

LAR (28.6%) and MES (11.2%) were the most and least frequent subtypes. The IHC-TNBC subtypes demonstrated distinct clinicopathological features and biomarker profiles, corresponding to the reported features in gene profiling studies. IM-inflamed subtype had the best outcome, while BLIS had a significantly poorer survival. Differential breast-specific marker expressions were found. Trichorhinophalangeal syndrome type 1 (TRPS1) was more sensitive for IM-inflamed and BLIS, GATA-binding protein 3 (GATA3) for IM-excluded and MES, and gross cystic disease fluid protein 15 (GCDFP15) for LAR subtypes.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings demonstrated the feasibility of IHC surrogates to stratify TNBC subtypes with distinct features and prognoses. The IM subtype can be refined by its CD8 spatial pattern. Breast-specific marker expression varied among the subtypes. Marker selection should be tailored accordingly.

PD-L1 testing in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer: Interobserver and interplatform reproducibility of CE-IVD assays for CPS and IC scores

PD-L1 test is recommended in different types of tumors to select patients eligible for immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) therapy. Several factors make this test challenging in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC). Different assays and platforms are available, each associated with distinct scoring systems and threshold values specific to the ICI compound used, i.e. CPS≥10 for pembrolizumab and IC ≥ 1 % for atezolizumab. Our objective was to assess the consistency of PD-L1 testing in mTNBC by examining interobserver and interassay reproducibility. We assessed n = 60 mTNBC samples for PD-L1 testing using 22C3 pharmDx assay on a Dako Autostainer Link 48 and VENTANA PD-L1 (SP263) on a Ventana BenchMark Ultra. Additionally, a subset of n = 19 samples was tested using the SP142 assay, also on the Ventana BenchMark Ultra. CPS with both 22C3 and SP263 was independently evaluated by five pathologists, all certified PD-L1 trainers. The IC with SP142 was assessed by three of these pathologists, who have particular expertise in breast pathology. Following the computation of the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for each assay and their respective thresholds, we assessed the agreement between different raters and assays using Fleiss's κ, with a 95 % confidence interval (CI). Overall, we observed a significant (p < 0.001) ICC with both CPS assays [22C3 = 0.939 (CI:0.913-0.96); SP263 = 0.972 (CI:0.96-0.982); combined 22C3-SP263 = 0.909 (CI:0.874-0.938)]. Fleiss's κ confirmed an almost perfect agreement among pathologists and assays: 22C3 = 0.938 (CI:0.857-1.018); SP263 = 0.972 (CI:0.890-1.052); combined 22C3-SP263 = 0.907 (CI:0.869-0.945). Perfect inter-rater agreement was reached considering IC. This study establishes the reliability of assessing CPS in mTNBC using either the 22C3 pharmDx, as employed in the KEYNOTE studies, or the VENTANA SP263 assay. Each assay must be used on its designated platform, namely the Dako for 22C3 pharmDx and the Ventana for VENTANA SP263. It is important to remark that CPS and IC identify different patient cohorts and, therefore, are not interchangeable.

Triple Negative Breast Cancers: An Obsolete Entity?

Triple negative breast cancer is defined on the basis of what it is not. It has served as a useful umbrella entity for management of patients with breast cancer for the last couple of decades. However, during this period a number of novel therapies have become available. These therapies have been documented to be useful in subsets of TNBCs that can be identified on the basis of distinct biologic alterations. Herein we revisit the categorization and usage of the TNBC as an entity to assess its utility in view of the currently available therapies.

Advances in Early Breast Cancer Risk Profiling: From Histopathology to Molecular Technologies

Early breast cancer (BC) is the definition applied to breast-confined tumors with or without limited involvement of locoregional lymph nodes. While risk stratification is essential for guiding clinical decisions, it can be a complex endeavor in these patients due to the absence of comprehensive guidelines. Histopathological analysis and biomarker assessment play a pivotal role in defining patient outcomes. Traditional histological criteria such as tumor size, lymph node involvement, histological type and grade, lymphovascular invasion, and immune cell infiltration are significant prognostic indicators. In addition to the hormone receptor, HER2, and-in specific scenarios-BRCA1/2 testing, molecular subtyping through gene expression profiling provides valuable insights to tailor clinical decision-making. The emergence of "omics" technologies, applicable to both tissue and liquid biopsy samples, has broadened our arsenal for evaluating the risk of early BC. However, a pressing need remains for standardized methodologies and integrated pathological models that encompass multiple analytical dimensions. In this study, we provide a detailed examination of the existing strategies for early BC risk stratification, intending to serve as a practical guide for histopathologists and molecular pathologists.

PRMT6 methylation of STAT3 regulates tumor metastasis in breast cancer

Overcoming distant metastasis stands as a paramount challenge in enhancing the outcomes of breast cancer treatments. Thus, delving deeper into comprehending the intricate mechanisms underlying breast cancer metastasis becomes imperative, offering potential avenues for pioneering therapeutic approaches. PRMT6, an arginine N-methyltransferase, possesses the ability to methylate both histone and non-histone proteins. It has been reported that methylation of non-histone proteins impacts their cellular localization, stability, and activation, consequently influencing tumor progression. However, the extent to which PRMT6-mediated non-histone protein methylation influences cancer cell metastasis, particularly in the context of breast cancer, remains elusive. In this study, we established that PRMT6 exerted a positive regulatory influence on breast cancer metastasis through both in vivo and in vitro experiments. Mechanistically, we innovatively revealed that PRMT6 asymmetrically di-methylated STAT3 at arginine 729 (STAT3 R729me2a). This modification proved indispensable for STAT3's membrane localization, its interaction with JAK2, STAT3 Y705 phosphorylation, and PRMT6-driven cancer cell metastasis. From a clinical perspective, we unearthed the promising potential of STAT3 R729me2a as a robust prognostic marker for predicting the overall survival time of breast cancer patients. In terms of therapeutic intervention, we demonstrated the significant capability of the PRMT6 inhibitor, EPZ020411, to curtail breast cancer metastasis both in vivo and in vitro. In sum, our study unveils the pivotal biological role of PRMT6-mediated STAT3 R729me2a in breast cancer metastasis and underscores the prospective utility of PRMT6 inhibitors as effective therapeutic strategies against STAT3-driven metastatic breast cancer.

Advancing the PD-L1 CPS test in metastatic TNBC: Insights from pathologists and findings from a nationwide survey

Pembrolizumab has received approval as a first-line treatment for unresectable/metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC) with a PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) of ≥ 10. However, assessing CPS in mTNBC poses challenges. Firstly, it represents a novel analysis for breast pathologists. Secondly, the heterogeneity of PD-L1 expression in mTNBC further complicates the assessment. Lastly, the lack of standardized assays and staining platforms adds to the complexity. In KEYNOTE trials, PD-L1 expression was evaluated using the IHC 22C3 pharmDx kit as a companion diagnostic test. However, both the 22C3 pharmDx and VENTANA PD-L1 (SP263) assays are validated for CPS assessment. Consequently, assay-platform choice, staining conditions, and scoring methods can significantly impact the testing outcomes. This consensus paper aims to discuss the intricacies of PD-L1 CPS testing in mTNBC and provide practical recommendations for pathologists. Additionally, we present findings from a nationwide Italian survey elucidating the state-of-the-art in PD-L1 CPS testing in mTNBC.

Tall Cell Carcinoma with Reversed Polarity: Case Report of a Rare Special Type of Breast Cancer and Review of the Literature

Background: Tall cell carcinoma of the breast with reversed polarity (TCCRP) is a rare type of invasive breast cancer with overlapping features with papillary thyroid carcinoma and a characteristic molecular profile. Few cases have been reported in the literature since the first case was described in 2003. Case presentation: We present the case of a 41-year-old female with a symptomatic left breast lump. Image-guided core biopsy was diagnosed as triple-negative apocrine carcinoma. Surgical excision revealed an invasive carcinoma with solid papillary pattern, nuclei arranged away from the basement membrane (reversed polarity) and luminal eosinophilic colloid-like material. The tumour was GATA3-, CK5-, CK14- and CK7-positive and TTF1-negative. Specialist opinion and the identification of hotspot mutations in the IDH2 p.Arg172 gene via PCR confirmed the diagnosis of TCCRP. Conclusions: TCCRP is a relatively recently recognised papillary epithelial neoplasm with characteristic morphological features and molecular profile. Due to its rarity, TCCRP can be diagnostically challenging, and features can be mistaken for benign and malignant lesions. Accurate diagnosis is important in effective treatment of this indolent malignant triple-negative breast cancer, which carries an excellent prognosis.

Immune Biomarkers in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Improving the Predictivity of Current Testing Methods

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) poses a significant challenge in terms of prognosis and disease recurrence. The limited treatment options and the development of resistance to chemotherapy make it particularly difficult to manage these patients. However, recent research has been shifting its focus towards biomarker-based approaches for TNBC, with a particular emphasis on the tumor immune landscape. Immune biomarkers in TNBC are now a subject of great interest due to the presence of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in these tumors. This characteristic often coincides with the presence of PD-L1 expression on both neoplastic cells and immune cells within the tumor microenvironment. Furthermore, a subset of TNBC harbor mismatch repair deficient (dMMR) TNBC, which is frequently accompanied by microsatellite instability (MSI). All of these immune biomarkers hold actionable potential for guiding patient selection in immunotherapy. To fully capitalize on these opportunities, the identification of additional or complementary biomarkers and the implementation of highly customized testing strategies are of paramount importance in TNBC. In this regard, this article aims to provide an overview of the current state of the art in immune-related biomarkers for TNBC. Specifically, it focuses on the various testing methodologies available and sheds light on the immediate future perspectives for patient selection. By delving into the advancements made in understanding the immune landscape of TNBC, this study aims to contribute to the growing body of knowledge in the field. The ultimate goal is to pave the way for the development of more personalized testing strategies, ultimately improving outcomes for TNBC patients.

Liquid Biopsy in the Management of Breast Cancer Patients: Where Are We Now and Where Are We Going

Liquid biopsy (LB) is an emerging diagnostic tool that analyzes biomarkers in the blood (and possibly in other body fluids) to provide information about tumor genetics and response to therapy. This review article provides an overview of LB applications in human cancer with a focus on breast cancer patients. LB methods include circulating tumor cells and cell-free tumor products, such as circulating tumor DNA. LB has shown potential in detecting cancer at an early stage, monitoring tumor progression and recurrence, and predicting patient response to therapy. Several studies have demonstrated its clinical utility in breast cancer patients. However, there are limitations to LB, including the lack of standardized assays and the need for further validation. Future potential applications of LB include identifying the minimal residual disease, early detection of recurrence, and monitoring treatment response in various cancer types. LB represents a promising non-invasive diagnostic tool with potential applications in breast cancer diagnosis, treatment, and management. Further research is necessary to fully understand its clinical utility and overcome its current limitations.