1
|
Yamada S, Hashimoto D, Yamamoto T, Yamaki S, Oshima K, Murotani K, Sekimoto M, Nakao A, Satoi S. Reconsideration of the clinical impact of neoadjuvant therapy in resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: A dual-institution collaborative clinical study. Pancreatology 2024; 24:592-599. [PMID: 38548551 DOI: 10.1016/j.pan.2024.03.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2023] [Revised: 03/05/2024] [Accepted: 03/23/2024] [Indexed: 06/12/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE We investigated true indication of neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) in resectable pancreatic cancer and the optimal surgical timing in borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. METHODS A total of 687 patients with resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic cancer were enrolled. Survival analysis was performed by intention-to-treat analysis and propensity score matching (PSM) was conducted. RESULTS In resectable disease, the NAT group showed better overall survival (OS) compared with the upfront group. Multivariate analysis identified CA19-9 level (≥100 U/mL) and lymph node metastasis to be prognostic factors, and a tumor size of 25 mm was the optimal cut-off value to predict lymph node metastasis. There was no significant survival difference between patients with a tumor size ≤25 mm and CA19-9 < 100 U/mL and those in the NAT group. In borderline resectable disease, OS in the NAT group was significantly better than that in the upfront group. CEA (≥5 ng/mL) and CA19-9 (≥100 U/mL) were identified as prognostic factors; however, the OS of patients fulfilling these factors was worse than that of the NAT group. CONCLUSIONS NAT could be unnecessary in patients with tumor size ≤25 mm and CA19-9 < 100 U/mL in resectable disease. In borderline resectable disease, surgery should be delayed until tumor marker levels are well controlled.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suguru Yamada
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Nagoya Central Hospital, Japan
| | | | | | - So Yamaki
- Department of Surgery, Kansai Medical University, Japan
| | - Kenji Oshima
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Nagoya Central Hospital, Japan
| | - Kenta Murotani
- Biostatistics Center, Graduate School of Medicine, Kurume University, Japan
| | - Mitsugu Sekimoto
- Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Akimasa Nakao
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Nagoya Central Hospital, Japan
| | - Sohei Satoi
- Department of Surgery, Kansai Medical University, Japan; Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Waugh E, Glinka J, Breadner D, Liu R, Tang E, Allen L, Welch S, Leslie K, Skaro A. Survival benefit of neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX for patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2024; 28:229-237. [PMID: 38296221 PMCID: PMC11128787 DOI: 10.14701/ahbps.23-107] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2023] [Revised: 12/05/2023] [Accepted: 12/09/2023] [Indexed: 05/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Backgrounds/Aims While patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC) are a target population for neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), formal guidelines for neoadjuvant therapy are lacking. We assessed the perioperative and oncological outcomes in patients with BRPC undergoing NAC with FOLFIRINOX for patients undergoing upfront surgery (US). Methods The AHPBA criteria for borderline resectability and/or a CA19-9 level > 100 μ/mL defined borderline resectable tumors retrieved from a prospectively populated institutional registry from 2007 to 2020. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS) at 1 and 3 years. A Cox Proportional Hazard model based on intention to treat was used. A receiver-operator characteristics (ROC) curve was constructed to assess the discriminatory capability of the use of CA19-9 > 100 μ/mL to predict resectability and mortality. Results Forty BRPC patients underwent NAC, while 46 underwent US. The median OS with NAC was 19.8 months (interquartile range [IQR], 10.3-44.24) vs. 10.6 months (IQR, 6.37-17.6) with US. At 1 year, 70% of the NAC group and 41.3% of the US group survived (p = 0.008). At 3 years, 42.5 % of the NAC group and 10.9% of the US group survived (p = 0.001). NAC significantly reduced the hazard of death (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.20; 95% confidence interval, 0.07-0.54; p = 0.001). CA19-9 > 100 μ/mL showed poor discrimination in predicting mortality, but was a moderate predictor of resectability. Conclusions We found a survival benefit of NAC with FOLFIRINOX for BRPC. Greater pre-treatment of CA19-9 and multivessel involvement on initial imaging were associated with progression of the disease following NAC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evelyn Waugh
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Juan Glinka
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Daniel Breadner
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Rachel Liu
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Ephraim Tang
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Laura Allen
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Stephen Welch
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Ken Leslie
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Anton Skaro
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kikuchi Y, Shimada H, Yamasaki F, Yamashita T, Araki K, Horimoto K, Yajima S, Yashiro M, Yokoi K, Cho H, Ehira T, Nakahara K, Yasuda H, Isobe K, Hayashida T, Hatakeyama S, Akakura K, Aoki D, Nomura H, Tada Y, Yoshimatsu Y, Miyachi H, Takebayashi C, Hanamura I, Takahashi H. Clinical practice guidelines for molecular tumor marker, 2nd edition review part 2. Int J Clin Oncol 2024; 29:512-534. [PMID: 38493447 DOI: 10.1007/s10147-024-02497-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2024] [Accepted: 02/21/2024] [Indexed: 03/19/2024]
Abstract
In recent years, rapid advancement in gene/protein analysis technology has resulted in target molecule identification that may be useful in cancer treatment. Therefore, "Clinical Practice Guidelines for Molecular Tumor Marker, Second Edition" was published in Japan in September 2021. These guidelines were established to align the clinical usefulness of external diagnostic products with the evaluation criteria of the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency. The guidelines were scoped for each tumor, and a clinical questionnaire was developed based on a serious clinical problem. This guideline was based on a careful review of the evidence obtained through a literature search, and recommendations were identified following the recommended grades of the Medical Information Network Distribution Services (Minds). Therefore, this guideline can be a tool for cancer treatment in clinical practice. We have already reported the review portion of "Clinical Practice Guidelines for Molecular Tumor Marker, Second Edition" as Part 1. Here, we present the English version of each part of the Clinical Practice Guidelines for Molecular Tumor Marker, Second Edition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Hideaki Shimada
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Toho University, Tokyo, Japan.
- Department of Surgery, Toho University, Tokyo, Japan.
| | - Fumiyuki Yamasaki
- Department of Neurosurgery, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Taku Yamashita
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Koji Araki
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, National Defense Medical College, Saitama, Japan
| | - Kohei Horimoto
- Department of Dermatology, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan
| | | | - Masakazu Yashiro
- Department of Molecular Oncology and Therapeutics, Osaka Metropolitan University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Keigo Yokoi
- Department of Lower Gastrointestinal Surgery, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Haruhiko Cho
- Department of Surgery, Tokyo Metropolitan Komagome Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takuya Ehira
- Department of Gastroenterology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Kazunari Nakahara
- Department of Gastroenterology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Yasuda
- Department of Gastroenterology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Kazutoshi Isobe
- Division of Respiratory Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine (Omori), Toho University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tetsu Hayashida
- Department of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shingo Hatakeyama
- Department of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Aomori, Japan
| | | | - Daisuke Aoki
- International University of Health and Welfare Graduate School, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Nomura
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Fujita Health University, Aichi, Japan
| | - Yuji Tada
- Department of Pulmonology, School of Medicine, International University of Health and Welfare, Chiba, Japan
| | - Yuki Yoshimatsu
- Department of Patient-Derived Cancer Model, Tochigi Cancer Center Research Institute, Tochigi, Japan
| | - Hayato Miyachi
- Faculty of Clinical Laboratory Sciences, Nitobe Bunka College, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Chiaki Takebayashi
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine (Omori), Toho University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ichiro Hanamura
- Division of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Aichi Medical University, Aichi, Japan
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Seelen LWF, Doppenberg D, Stoop TF, Nagelhout A, Brada LJH, Bosscha K, Busch OR, Cirkel GA, den Dulk M, Daams F, van Dieren S, van Eijck CHJ, Festen S, Groot Koerkamp B, Haj Mohammad N, de Hingh IHJT, Lips DJ, Los M, de Meijer VE, Patijn GA, Polée MB, Stommel MWJ, Walma MS, de Wilde RF, Wilmink JW, Molenaar IQ, van Santvoort HC, Besselink MG. Minimum and Optimal CA19-9 Response After Two Months Induction Chemotherapy in Patients With Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: A Nationwide Multicenter Study. Ann Surg 2024; 279:832-841. [PMID: 37477009 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000006021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/22/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This nationwide multicenter study aimed to define clinically relevant thresholds of relative serum CA19-9 response after 2 months of induction chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). BACKGROUND CA19-9 is seen as leading biomarker for response evaluation in patients with LAPC, but early clinically useful cut-offs are lacking. METHODS All consecutive patients with LAPC after 4 cycles (m)FOLFIRINOX or 2 cycles gemcitabine-nab-paclitaxel induction chemotherapy (±radiotherapy) with CA19-9 ≥5 U/mL at baseline were analyzed (2015-2019). The association of CA19-9 response with median OS (mOS) was evaluated for different CA19-9 cut-off points. Minimum and optimal CA19-9 response were established via log-rank test. Predictors for OS were analyzed using COX regression analysis. RESULTS Overall, 212 patients were included, of whom 42 (19.8%) underwent resection. Minimum CA19-9 response demonstrating a clinically significant median OS difference (12.7 vs. 19.6 months) was seen at ≥40% CA19-9 decrease. The optimal cutoff for CA19-9 response was ≥60% decrease (21.7 vs. 14.0 mo, P =0.021). Only for patients with elevated CA19-9 levels at baseline (n=184), CA19-9 decrease ≥60% [hazard ratio (HR)=0.59, 95% CI, 0.36-0.98, P =0.042] was independently associated with prolonged OS, as were SBRT (HR=0.42, 95% CI, 0.25-0.70; P =0.001), and resection (HR=0.25, 95% CI, 0.14-0.46, P <0.001), and duration of chemotherapy (HR=0.75, 95% CI, 0.69-0.82, P <0.001). CONCLUSIONS CA19-9 decrease of ≥60% following induction chemotherapy as optimal response cut-off in patients with LAPC is an independent predictor for OS when CA19-9 is increased at baseline. Furthermore, ≥40% is the minimum cut-off demonstrating survival benefit. These cut-offs may be used when discussing treatment strategies during early response evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leonard W F Seelen
- Department of Surgery, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center and St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein: Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Deesje Doppenberg
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Thomas F Stoop
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Anne Nagelhout
- Department of Surgery, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center and St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein: Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Lilly J H Brada
- Department of Surgery, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center and St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein: Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Koop Bosscha
- Department of Surgery, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands
| | - Olivier R Busch
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Geert A Cirkel
- Department of Medical Oncology, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Meander Medical Center Amersfoort, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Marcel den Dulk
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Aachen, Germany
| | - Freek Daams
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Susan van Dieren
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Bas Groot Koerkamp
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Nadia Haj Mohammad
- Department of Medical Oncology, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Daan J Lips
- Department of Surgery, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Maartje Los
- Department of Medical Oncology, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Vincent E de Meijer
- Department of Surgery, University of Groningen and University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Gijs A Patijn
- Department of Surgery, Isala Clinics, Zwolle, The Netherlands
| | - Marco B Polée
- Department of Medical Oncology, Medical Center Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands
| | - Martijn W J Stommel
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Marieke S Walma
- Department of Surgery, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center and St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein: Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Roeland F de Wilde
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Johanna W Wilmink
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - I Quintus Molenaar
- Department of Surgery, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center and St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein: Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Hjalmar C van Santvoort
- Department of Surgery, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center and St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein: Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Marc G Besselink
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Theijse RT, Stoop TF, Janssen QP, Prakash LR, Katz MHG, Doppenberg D, Tzeng CWD, Wei AC, Zureikat AH, Groot Koerkamp B, Besselink MG. Impact of a non-therapeutic laparotomy in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer treated with induction (m)FOLFIRINOX: Trans-Atlantic Pancreatic Surgery (TAPS) Consortium study. Br J Surg 2024; 111:znae033. [PMID: 38456678 PMCID: PMC10921832 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znae033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2023] [Revised: 11/08/2023] [Accepted: 01/06/2024] [Indexed: 03/09/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Surgery in selected patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer after induction chemotherapy may have drawbacks related to surgical risks and breaks or delays in oncological treatment, in particular when curative intent resection is not possible (that is non-therapeutic laparotomy). The aim of this study was to assess the incidence and oncological impact of a non-therapeutic laparotomy in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer treated with induction (m)FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy. METHODS This was a retrospective international multicentre study including patients diagnosed with pathology-proven locally advanced pancreatic cancer treated with at least one cycle of (m)FOLFIRINOX (2012-2019). Patients undergoing a non-therapeutic laparotomy (group A) were compared with those not undergoing surgery (group B) and those undergoing resection (group C). RESULTS Overall, 663 patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer were included (67 patients (10.1%) in group A, 425 patients (64.1%) in group B, and 171 patients (25.8%) in group C). A non-therapeutic laparotomy occurred in 28.2% of all explorations (67 of 238), with occult metastases in 30 patients (30 of 67, 44.8%) and a 90-day mortality rate of 3.0% (2 of 67). Administration of palliative therapy (65.9% versus 73.1%; P = 0.307) and median overall survival (20.4 [95% c.i. 15.9 to 27.3] versus 20.2 [95% c.i. 19.1 to 22.7] months; P = 0.752) did not differ between group A and group B respectively. The median overall survival in group C was 36.1 (95% c.i. 30.5 to 41.2) months. The 5-year overall survival rates were 11.4%, 8.7%, and 24.7% in group A, group B, and group C, respectively. Compared with group B, non-therapeutic laparotomy (group A) was not associated with reduced overall survival (HR = 0.88 [95% c.i. 0.61 to 1.27]). CONCLUSION More than a quarter of surgically explored patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer after induction (m)FOLFIRINOX did not undergo a resection. Such non-therapeutic laparotomy does not appear to substantially impact oncological outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rutger T Theijse
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Thomas F Stoop
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Quisette P Janssen
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Laura R Prakash
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Division of Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Matthew H G Katz
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Division of Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Deesje Doppenberg
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ching-Wei D Tzeng
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Division of Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Alice C Wei
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Amer H Zureikat
- Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Bas Groot Koerkamp
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marc G Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Turner KM, Wilson GC, Patel SH, Ahmad SA. ASO Practice Guidelines Series: Management of Resectable, Borderline Resectable, and Locally Advanced Pancreas Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2024; 31:1884-1897. [PMID: 37980709 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-14585-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2023] [Accepted: 10/29/2023] [Indexed: 11/21/2023]
Abstract
Pancreatic adenocarcinoma is an aggressive disease marked by high rates of both local and distant failure. In the minority of patients with potentially resectable disease, multimodal treatment paradigms have allowed for prolonged survival in an increasingly larger pool of well-selected patients. Therefore, it is critical for surgical oncologists to be abreast of current guideline recommendations for both surgical management and multimodal therapy for pancreas cancer. We discuss these guidelines, as well as the underlying data supporting these positions, to offer surgical oncologists a framework for managing patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin M Turner
- Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Gregory C Wilson
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Sameer H Patel
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Syed A Ahmad
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Stoop TF, Theijse RT, Seelen LWF, Groot Koerkamp B, van Eijck CHJ, Wolfgang CL, van Tienhoven G, van Santvoort HC, Molenaar IQ, Wilmink JW, Del Chiaro M, Katz MHG, Hackert T, Besselink MG. Preoperative chemotherapy, radiotherapy and surgical decision-making in patients with borderline resectable and locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2024; 21:101-124. [PMID: 38036745 DOI: 10.1038/s41575-023-00856-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/05/2023] [Indexed: 12/02/2023]
Abstract
Surgical resection combined with systemic chemotherapy is the cornerstone of treatment for patients with localized pancreatic cancer. Upfront surgery is considered suboptimal in cases with extensive vascular involvement, which can be classified as either borderline resectable pancreatic cancer or locally advanced pancreatic cancer. In these patients, FOLFIRINOX or gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel chemotherapy is currently used as preoperative chemotherapy and is eventually combined with radiotherapy. Thus, more patients might reach 5-year overall survival. Patient selection for chemotherapy, radiotherapy and subsequent surgery is based on anatomical, biological and conditional parameters. Current guidelines and clinical practices vary considerably regarding preoperative chemotherapy and radiotherapy, response evaluation, and indications for surgery. In this Review, we provide an overview of the clinical evidence regarding disease staging, preoperative therapy, response evaluation and surgery in patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer or locally advanced pancreatic cancer. In addition, a clinical work-up is proposed based on the available evidence and guidelines. We identify knowledge gaps and outline a proposed research agenda.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas F Stoop
- Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Rutger T Theijse
- Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Leonard W F Seelen
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, University Medical Center Utrecht and St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Bas Groot Koerkamp
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Casper H J van Eijck
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Christopher L Wolfgang
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, New York University Medical Center, New York City, NY, USA
| | - Geertjan van Tienhoven
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Hjalmar C van Santvoort
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, University Medical Center Utrecht and St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - I Quintus Molenaar
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, University Medical Center Utrecht and St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Johanna W Wilmink
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Marco Del Chiaro
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Matthew H G Katz
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Thilo Hackert
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Marc G Besselink
- Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Secanella L, Busquets J, Peláez N, Sorribas M, Laquente B, Ruiz-Osuna S, Fabregat J. The involvement of the hepatic artery is a risk factor for unresectability after neoadjuvant treatment in borderline pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Surg Oncol 2024; 52:102027. [PMID: 38113726 DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2023.102027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2023] [Revised: 11/27/2023] [Accepted: 12/05/2023] [Indexed: 12/21/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (BR-PDAC) benefits from neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) with the intent of surgical salvage in the absence of disease progression during chemotherapy (CT) or chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Scarce literature exists about prognostic factors of resectability at the time of diagnosis or during neoadjuvant treatment, especially regarding vascular relationships. MATERIALS We reviewed our prospective BR-PDAC cohort to determine resectability predictors. We collected data about clinical baseline characteristics, vessels' involvement, type of NAT, CA19-9 evolution, and radiological outcome. We performed a descriptive analysis and a logistic regression model to define resectability predictors; we finally compared overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) for those predictors. RESULTS One hundred patients started NAT, with a resection rate of 44 % (40 pancreaticoduodenectomies, 4 distal pancreatectomies). The most frequent vessel relationship was the abutment of the superior mesenteric artery (44 %), and 26 patients had ≥2 vessels involved. Prognostic factors of resectability were CA19-9 response >10 % (OR 3.07, p = 0.016) and Hepatic Artery involvement (OR 0.21, p = 0.026). Median overall survival was better for CA19-9 responders than for non-responders (20.9 months and 11.8 months respectively, p < 0.001), and similar to normalized CA19-9 (25.0 months, p = 0.48). There were no differences in terms of OS or PFS with the involvement of the HA (17.7 vs 17.1 months, p = 0.367; and 8.7 vs 12.0 months, p = 0.267). CONCLUSION The involvement of the Hepatic Artery seems to confer a worse prognosis regarding resectability. A decrease of only >10 % of CA19-9 is a predictive factor for resectability and better overall and progression-free survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luis Secanella
- Digestive and General Surgery Department, Bellvitge University Hospital, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain; Research Group of Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Diseases, Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge - IDIBELL, University of Barcelona, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain; Departament d'Infermeria Fonamental i Clínica, Facultat d'Infermeria, Universitat de Barcelona (UB), Campus Bellvitge, Feixa Llarga s/n, 08907, l'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Juli Busquets
- Digestive and General Surgery Department, Bellvitge University Hospital, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain; Research Group of Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Diseases, Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge - IDIBELL, University of Barcelona, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain; Departament de Ciències Clíniques, Facultat de Medicina i Ciències de la Salut, Universitat de Barcelona (UB), Casanova 143, 08036, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Núria Peláez
- Digestive and General Surgery Department, Bellvitge University Hospital, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain; Research Group of Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Diseases, Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge - IDIBELL, University of Barcelona, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - María Sorribas
- Digestive and General Surgery Department, Bellvitge University Hospital, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain; Research Group of Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Diseases, Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge - IDIBELL, University of Barcelona, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Berta Laquente
- Medical Oncology Department, Catalan Institute of Oncology, IDIBELL, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Sandra Ruiz-Osuna
- Radiology Department, Bellvitge University Hospital, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Juan Fabregat
- Digestive and General Surgery Department, Bellvitge University Hospital, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain; Research Group of Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Diseases, Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge - IDIBELL, University of Barcelona, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain; Departament de Ciències Clíniques, Facultat de Medicina i Ciències de la Salut, Universitat de Barcelona (UB), Casanova 143, 08036, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Boyev A, Prakash LR, Chiang YJ, Newhook TE, Bruno ML, Arvide EM, Dewhurst WL, Kim MP, Ikoma N, Lee JE, Snyder RA, Tzeng CWD, Katz MHG, Maxwell JE. Elevated CA 19-9 is associated with worse survival in patients with resected ampullary adenocarcinoma. Surg Oncol 2023; 51:101994. [PMID: 37742542 DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2023.101994] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2023] [Revised: 08/31/2023] [Accepted: 09/17/2023] [Indexed: 09/26/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The prognostic utility of Carbohydrate Antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9) and Carcinoembryonic Antigen (CEA) in ampullary adenocarcinoma is unclear. We sought to evaluate the association between initial tumor marker levels and survival in patients with resected ampullary adenocarcinoma. METHODS This was a single-institution, retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy for ampullary adenocarcinoma from 1999 to 2021. CA 19-9 was assessed after biliary decompression. Contal and O'Quigley method determined optimal biomarker cutoff levels which were correlated with overall survival (OS) using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox Proportional Hazards Regression. RESULTS A total of 180 patients underwent pancreatoduodenectomy. Patients with CA 19-9 >100 U/mL had a shorter median OS (28 vs. 132 months, p < 0.001) compared to patients with CA 19-9 ≤ 100 U/mL at diagnosis. Survival was similar between pancreaticobiliary and intestinal tumor subtypes when CA 19-9 was >100 U/mL (OS:25 vs. 33 months, p = 0.415). By Cox regression analysis, CA 19-9 >100 U/mL was independently associated with worse OS (HR 2.8, p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Preoperative CA 19-9 >100 U/mL was associated with shorter OS in patients with resected ampullary adenocarcinoma. CA 19-9 may be useful when counseling patients about prognosis or when considering the role of perioperative systemic therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Artem Boyev
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Laura R Prakash
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Yi-Ju Chiang
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Timothy E Newhook
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Morgan L Bruno
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Elsa M Arvide
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Whitney L Dewhurst
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Michael P Kim
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Naruhiko Ikoma
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jeffrey E Lee
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Rebecca A Snyder
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ching-Wei D Tzeng
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Matthew H G Katz
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jessica E Maxwell
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Amburn T, Davenport D, Patel R, Moss J, Pandalai P, Kim J, Cavnar M. New Cancer-Related Symptoms Predict Recurrence in CA19-9 Non-Expressers After Resection of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. Am Surg 2023; 89:4469-4478. [PMID: 35921431 DOI: 10.1177/00031348221117031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION CA19-9 elevation has been reported to predict recurrence after resection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), although only two-thirds of patients are expressers. Preoperatively, cancer-related symptoms predict outcome; however, it is unknown whether symptoms predict recurrence during surveillance, particularly for CA19-9 non-expressers. METHODS Patients undergoing resection of PDAC at our institution from 2012 to 21 (n = 165) were retrospectively reviewed for CA19-9 and symptoms, which were correlated with recurrence-free survival (RFS). Multivariate analysis was performed using Cox regression. RESULTS During postoperative surveillance, CA19-9 elevation and development of symptoms (abdominal pain, weight loss, or jaundice) were associated with worse RFS (P < .05). Multivariate analysis showed that both symptoms and CA19-9 were independently predictive of RFS (HR 1.8 [1.1-2.9; P = .025] and 2.5 [1.0-6.0; P = .048]). Among CA19-9 non-expressers (n = 51), development of symptoms was associated with detection of recurrence (P = .012). CONCLUSIONS Among CA19-9 non-expressers, development of symptoms predicted recurrence, providing a useful tool for recurrence detection in these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Amburn
- Department of Surgery, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Daniel Davenport
- Department of Surgery, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Reema Patel
- Department of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Jessica Moss
- Department of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Prakash Pandalai
- Department of Surgery, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Joseph Kim
- Department of Surgery, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Michael Cavnar
- Department of Surgery, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Chiu YF, Liu TW, Shan YS, Chen JS, Li CP, Ho CL, Hsieh RK, Hwang TL, Chen LT, Ch'ang HJ. Carbohydrate Antigen 19-9 Response to Initial Adjuvant Chemotherapy Predicts Survival and Failure Pattern of Resected Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma but Not Which Patients Are Suited for Additional Adjuvant Chemoradiation Therapy: From a Prospective Randomized Study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 117:74-86. [PMID: 37055279 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.02.061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2022] [Revised: 02/19/2023] [Accepted: 02/25/2023] [Indexed: 04/15/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The predictive value of carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) for adjuvant chemo(radiation) therapy of resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is undefined. METHODS AND MATERIALS We analyzed CA19-9 levels in patients with resected PDAC in a prospective randomized trial of adjuvant chemotherapy with or without additional chemoradiation therapy (CRT). Patients with postoperative CA19-9 ≤92.5 U/mL and serum bilirubin ≤2 mg/dL were randomized to 2 arms: patients in 1 arm received 6 cycles of gemcitabine, whereas those in the other received 3 cycles of gemcitabine followed by CRT and another 3 cycles of gemcitabine. Serum CA19-9 was measured every 12 weeks. Those who had CA19-9 levels always <3 U/mL were excluded from the exploratory analysis. RESULTS One hundred forty-seven patients were enrolled in this randomized trial. Twenty-two patients with CA19-9 levels always ≤3 U/mL were excluded from the analysis. For the 125 participants, median overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival were 23.1 and 12.1 months, respectively, with no significant differences between the study arms. Postresection CA19-9 levels and, to a lesser extent, CA19-9 change predicted OS (P = .040 and .077, respectively). For the 89 patients who completed the initial 3 cycles of adjuvant gemcitabine, the CA19-9 response was significantly correlated with initial failure over the distant site (P = .023) and OS (P = .0022). Despite a trend of less initial failure over the locoregional area (P = .031), neither postoperative CA19-9 level nor CA19-9 response helped to select patients who might have a survival benefit from additional adjuvant CRT. CONCLUSIONS CA19-9 response to initial adjuvant gemcitabine predicts survival and distant failure of PDAC after resection; however, it cannot select patients suited for additional adjuvant CRT. Monitoring CA19-9 levels during adjuvant therapy for postoperative patients with PDAC may guide therapeutic decisions to prevent distant failure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yen-Feng Chiu
- Institute of Public Health Sciences, National Health Research Institutes, Miaoli, Taiwan
| | - Tsang-Wu Liu
- National Institute of Cancer Research, National Health Research Institutes, Miaoli, Taiwan
| | - Yan-Shen Shan
- Department of Surgery, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan
| | - Jen-Shi Chen
- Department of Hematology-Oncology, Linkou Chang-Gung Memorial Hospital, Tao-Yuan, Taiwan
| | - Chung-Pin Li
- Divisions of Clinical Skills Training, Department of Medical Education, Taipei, Taiwan; Divisions of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; School of Medicine, College of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Ching-Liang Ho
- Department of Internal Medicine, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Ruey-Kuen Hsieh
- Department of Internal Medicine, Mackay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Tsann-Long Hwang
- Department of Surgery, Linkou Chang-Gung Memorial Hospital, Tao-Yuan, Taiwan
| | - Li-Tzong Chen
- National Institute of Cancer Research, National Health Research Institutes, Miaoli, Taiwan; Department of Internal Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan; Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Hui-Ju Ch'ang
- National Institute of Cancer Research, National Health Research Institutes, Miaoli, Taiwan; Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan; Taipei Cancer Center, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Schepis T, De Lucia SS, Pellegrino A, Del Gaudio A, Maresca R, Coppola G, Chiappetta MF, Gasbarrini A, Franceschi F, Candelli M, Nista EC. State-of-the-Art and Upcoming Innovations in Pancreatic Cancer Care: A Step Forward to Precision Medicine. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:3423. [PMID: 37444534 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15133423] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2023] [Revised: 06/20/2023] [Accepted: 06/27/2023] [Indexed: 07/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic cancer remains a social and medical burden despite the tremendous advances that medicine has made in the last two decades. The incidence of pancreatic cancer is increasing, and it continues to be associated with high mortality and morbidity rates. The difficulty of early diagnosis (the lack of specific symptoms and biomarkers at early stages), the aggressiveness of the disease, and its resistance to systemic therapies are the main factors for the poor prognosis of pancreatic cancer. The only curative treatment for pancreatic cancer is surgery, but the vast majority of patients with pancreatic cancer have advanced disease at the time of diagnosis. Pancreatic surgery is among the most challenging surgical procedures, but recent improvements in surgical techniques, careful patient selection, and the availability of minimally invasive techniques (e.g., robotic surgery) have dramatically reduced the morbidity and mortality associated with pancreatic surgery. Patients who are not candidates for surgery may benefit from locoregional and systemic therapy. In some cases (e.g., patients for whom marginal resection is feasible), systemic therapy may be considered a bridge to surgery to allow downstaging of the cancer; in other cases (e.g., metastatic disease), systemic therapy is considered the standard approach with the goal of prolonging patient survival. The complexity of patients with pancreatic cancer requires a personalized and multidisciplinary approach to choose the best treatment for each clinical situation. The aim of this article is to provide a literature review of the available treatments for the different stages of pancreatic cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tommaso Schepis
- Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Digestive Diseases, CEMAD, Gastroenterology Department, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
- Department of Translational Medicine and Surgery, School of Medicine, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart of Rome, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Sara Sofia De Lucia
- Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Digestive Diseases, CEMAD, Gastroenterology Department, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
- Department of Translational Medicine and Surgery, School of Medicine, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart of Rome, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Antonio Pellegrino
- Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Digestive Diseases, CEMAD, Gastroenterology Department, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
- Department of Translational Medicine and Surgery, School of Medicine, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart of Rome, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Angelo Del Gaudio
- Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Digestive Diseases, CEMAD, Gastroenterology Department, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
- Department of Translational Medicine and Surgery, School of Medicine, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart of Rome, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Rossella Maresca
- Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Digestive Diseases, CEMAD, Gastroenterology Department, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
- Department of Translational Medicine and Surgery, School of Medicine, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart of Rome, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Gaetano Coppola
- Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Digestive Diseases, CEMAD, Gastroenterology Department, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
- Department of Translational Medicine and Surgery, School of Medicine, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart of Rome, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Michele Francesco Chiappetta
- Section of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Promise, Policlinico Universitario Paolo Giaccone, 90127 Palermo, Italy
- IBD-Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, 98122 Messina, Italy
| | - Antonio Gasbarrini
- Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Digestive Diseases, CEMAD, Gastroenterology Department, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
- Department of Translational Medicine and Surgery, School of Medicine, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart of Rome, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Franceschi
- Department of Emergency Anesthesiological and Reanimation Sciences, Fondazione Universitaria Policlinico Agostino Gemelli di Roma, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart of Rome, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Marcello Candelli
- Department of Emergency Anesthesiological and Reanimation Sciences, Fondazione Universitaria Policlinico Agostino Gemelli di Roma, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart of Rome, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Enrico Celestino Nista
- Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Digestive Diseases, CEMAD, Gastroenterology Department, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
- Department of Translational Medicine and Surgery, School of Medicine, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart of Rome, 00168 Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Ghabi EM, Shoucair S, Ding D, Javed AA, Thompson ED, Zheng L, Cameron JL, Wolfgang CL, Shubert CR, Lafaro KJ, Burkhart RA, Burns WR, He J. Tailoring Adjuvant Chemotherapy to Biologic Response Following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Impacts Overall Survival in Pancreatic Cancer. J Gastrointest Surg 2023; 27:691-700. [PMID: 36280632 PMCID: PMC10079604 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-022-05476-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2022] [Accepted: 09/16/2022] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The role of postoperative chemotherapy in patients with resected pancreatic cancer who receive neoadjuvant treatment is unknown. Clinicians use changes in CA19-9 and histopathologic scores to assess treatment response. We sought to investigate if CA19-9 normalization in response to NAT can help guide the need for postoperative treatment. METHODS Patients with elevated baseline CA19-9 (CA19-9 > 37U/mL) who received NAT followed by surgery between 2011 and 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Treatment response was determined by CA19-9 normalization following NAT and histopathologic scoring. The role of postoperative chemotherapy was analyzed in light of CA19-9 normalization and histopathologic response. RESULTS We identified and included 345 patients. Following NAT, CA19-9 normalization was observed in 125 patients (36.2%). CA19-9 normalization was associated with a favorable histopathologic response (41.6% vs 23.2%, p < 0.001) and a lower ypT (p < 0.001) and ypN stage (p = 0.003). Receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with improved overall survival in patients in whom CA19-9 did not normalize following NAT (26.8 vs 16.4 months, p = 0.008). In patients who received 5FU-based NAT and in whom CA19-9 did not normalize, receipt of 5FU-based adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with improved OS (p = 0.014). CONCLUSION CA19-9 normalization in response to NAT was associated with favorable outcomes and can serve as a biomarker for treatment response. In patients where CA19-9 did not normalize, receipt of postoperative chemotherapy was associated with improved OS. These patients also benefited from additional 5FU-based postoperative chemotherapy following 5FU-based NAT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elie M Ghabi
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 N. Wolfe Street, Blalock 685, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| | - Sami Shoucair
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 N. Wolfe Street, Blalock 685, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| | - Ding Ding
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 N. Wolfe Street, Blalock 685, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| | - Ammar A Javed
- Department of Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Elizabeth D Thompson
- Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Lei Zheng
- Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - John L Cameron
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 N. Wolfe Street, Blalock 685, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| | | | - Christopher R Shubert
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 N. Wolfe Street, Blalock 685, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| | - Kelly J Lafaro
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 N. Wolfe Street, Blalock 685, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| | - Richard A Burkhart
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 N. Wolfe Street, Blalock 685, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| | - William R Burns
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 N. Wolfe Street, Blalock 685, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| | - Jin He
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 N. Wolfe Street, Blalock 685, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Newhook TE, Vreeland TJ, Griffin JF, Tidwell RSS, Prakash LR, Koay EJ, Ludmir EB, Smaglo BG, Pant S, Overman M, Wolff RA, Ikoma N, Maxwell J, Kim MP, Lee JE, Katz MHG, Tzeng CWD. Prognosis Associated With CA19-9 Response Dynamics and Normalization During Neoadjuvant Therapy in Resected Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg 2023; 277:484-490. [PMID: 36649067 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000005184] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To characterize associations between carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) dynamics during neoadjuvant therapy (NT) and survival for patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). BACKGROUND Although normalization of CA19-9 during NT is associated with improved outcomes following PDAC resection, we hypothesize that CA19-9 dynamics during NT can improve prognostication. METHODS Characteristics for patients with PDAC undergoing NT (July 2011-October 2018) with ≥3 CA19-9 results (bilirubin<2mg/dL) were collected and grouped by CA19-9 dynamics. Nonproducers (<1 U/ml) were excluded, and normal was ≤35 U/ml. Postresection survival was compared among groups. RESULTS Of 431 patients, 166 had eligible CA19-9 values. Median baseline CA19-9 was 98 U/ml. Overall 2-year postresection recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were 37% and 63%, respectively. Patients with normalization (53%) had improved 2-year RFS (47% vs. 28%, P = 0.01) and OS (75% vs. 49%, P = 0.01). CA19-9 dynamics during NT were analyzed by shape, direction, and normalization creating response types ("A-B-C-D-E"). Type A was "Always" decreasing to normalization, B "Bidirectional" with eventual normalization, C "Consistently" normal, D any "Decrease" without normalization, and E "Elevating" without normalization. Types A and B responses were associated with the longest postresection 2-year RFS (51% and 56%) and OS (75% and 92%, respectively) whereas Types D and E had the worst outcomes. After adjusting for node-positivity, perineural invasion, and margin-positivity, CA19-9 response types were independently associated with both RFS and OS, and predicted outcomes are better than CA19-9 normalization alone (likelihood ratio test RFS P < 0.001, OS P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS This novel A-B-C-D-E classification of CA19-9 dynamics during NT was associated with postresection outcomes more precisely than CA19-9 normalization alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy E Newhook
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | | | - Rebecca S S Tidwell
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Laura R Prakash
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Eugene J Koay
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Ethan B Ludmir
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Brandon G Smaglo
- Department of Gastrointestinal Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Shubham Pant
- Department of Gastrointestinal Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Michael Overman
- Department of Gastrointestinal Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Robert A Wolff
- Department of Gastrointestinal Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Naruhiko Ikoma
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Jessica Maxwell
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Michael P Kim
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Jeffrey E Lee
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Matthew H G Katz
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Ching-Wei D Tzeng
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Mazer BL, Lee JW, Roberts NJ, Chu LC, Lennon AM, Klein AP, Eshleman JR, Fishman EK, Canto MI, Goggins MG, Hruban RH. Screening for pancreatic cancer has the potential to save lives, but is it practical? Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2023; 17:555-574. [PMID: 37212770 PMCID: PMC10424088 DOI: 10.1080/17474124.2023.2217354] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2023] [Revised: 04/21/2023] [Accepted: 05/19/2023] [Indexed: 05/23/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Most patients with pancreatic cancer present with advanced stage, incurable disease. However, patients with high-grade precancerous lesions and many patients with low-stage disease can be cured with surgery, suggesting that early detection has the potential to improve survival. While serum CA19.9 has been a long-standing biomarker used for pancreatic cancer disease monitoring, its low sensitivity and poor specificity have driven investigators to hunt for better diagnostic markers. AREAS COVERED This review will cover recent advances in genetics, proteomics, imaging, and artificial intelligence, which offer opportunities for the early detection of curable pancreatic neoplasms. EXPERT OPINION From exosomes, to circulating tumor DNA, to subtle changes on imaging, we know much more now about the biology and clinical manifestations of early pancreatic neoplasia than we did just five years ago. The overriding challenge, however, remains the development of a practical approach to screen for a relatively rare, but deadly, disease that is often treated with complex surgery. It is our hope that future advances will bring us closer to an effective and financially sound approach for the early detection of pancreatic cancer and its precursors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin L. Mazer
- The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
- Department of Pathology, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Jae W. Lee
- The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
- Department of Pathology, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Nicholas J. Roberts
- The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
- Department of Pathology, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
- Department of Oncology, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Linda C. Chu
- Department of Radiology, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Anne Marie Lennon
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Alison P. Klein
- The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
- Department of Pathology, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
- Department of Oncology, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - James R. Eshleman
- The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
- Department of Pathology, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
- Department of Oncology, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Elliot K. Fishman
- Department of Radiology, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Marcia Irene Canto
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Michael G. Goggins
- The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
- Department of Pathology, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
- Department of Oncology, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Ralph H. Hruban
- The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
- Department of Pathology, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
- Department of Oncology, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Maggino L, Malleo G, Crippa S, Belfiori G, Nobile S, Gasparini G, Lionetto G, Luchini C, Mattiolo P, Schiavo-Lena M, Doglioni C, Scarpa A, Bassi C, Falconi M, Salvia R. CA19.9 Response and Tumor Size Predict Recurrence Following Post-neoadjuvant Pancreatectomy in Initially Resectable and Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:207-219. [PMID: 36227391 PMCID: PMC9726670 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-12622-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2022] [Accepted: 09/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Data on recurrence after post-neoadjuvant pancreatectomy are scant. This study investigated the incidence and pattern of recurrence in patients with initially resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma who received post-neoadjuvant pancreatectomy. Furthermore, preoperative predictors of recurrence-free survival (RFS) and their interactions were determined. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients undergoing post-neoadjuvant pancreatectomy at two academic facilities between 2013 and 2017 were analyzed using standard statistics. The possible interplay between preoperative parameters was scrutinized including interaction terms in multivariable Cox models. RESULTS Among 315 included patients, 152 (48.3%) were anatomically resectable. The median RFS was 15.7 months, with 1- and 3-year recurrence rates of 41.9% and 74.2%, respectively. Distant recurrence occurred in 83.3% of patients, with lung-only patterns exhibiting the most favorable prognostic outlook. Normal posttreatment CA19.9, ΔCA19.9 (both in patients with normal and elevated baseline levels), and posttreatment tumor size were associated with RFS. Critical thresholds for ΔCA19.9 and tumor size were set at 50% and 20 mm, respectively. Interaction between ΔCA19.9 and posttreatment CA19.9 suggested a significant risk reduction in patients with elevated values when ΔCA19.9 exceeded 50%. Moreover, posttreatment tumor size interacted with posttreatment CA19.9 and ΔCA19.9, suggesting an increased risk in the instance of elevated posttreatment CA19.9 values and a protective effect associated with CA19.9 response in patients with tumor size >20 mm. CONCLUSION Recurrence following post-neoadjuvant pancreatectomy is common. Preoperative tumor size <20 mm, normal posttreatment CA19.9 and ΔCA19.9 > 50% were associated with longer RFS. These variables should not be taken in isolation, as their interaction significantly modulates the recurrence risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Maggino
- Unit of General and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery and Oncology, University of Verona Hospital Trust, G.B. Rossi Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Malleo
- Unit of General and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery and Oncology, University of Verona Hospital Trust, G.B. Rossi Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Stefano Crippa
- Unit of Pancreatic Surgery, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Center, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy
| | - Giulio Belfiori
- Unit of Pancreatic Surgery, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Center, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy
| | - Sara Nobile
- Unit of General and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery and Oncology, University of Verona Hospital Trust, G.B. Rossi Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Giulia Gasparini
- Unit of Pancreatic Surgery, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Center, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy
| | - Gabriella Lionetto
- Unit of General and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery and Oncology, University of Verona Hospital Trust, G.B. Rossi Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Claudio Luchini
- Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, Section of Pathology, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Paola Mattiolo
- Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, Section of Pathology, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Marco Schiavo-Lena
- Division of Pathology, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Center, Vita-Salute University, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Claudio Doglioni
- Division of Pathology, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Center, Vita-Salute University, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Aldo Scarpa
- Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, Section of Pathology, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Claudio Bassi
- Unit of General and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery and Oncology, University of Verona Hospital Trust, G.B. Rossi Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Massimo Falconi
- Unit of Pancreatic Surgery, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Center, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy
| | - Roberto Salvia
- Unit of General and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery and Oncology, University of Verona Hospital Trust, G.B. Rossi Hospital, Verona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Andersson R, Tingstedt B. Neoadjuvant chemo(radio)therapy in upfront resectable pancreatic cancer - can we stratify patients better in the future? Scand J Gastroenterol 2023; 58:1-2. [PMID: 35856841 DOI: 10.1080/00365521.2022.2100226] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Roland Andersson
- Department of Surgery, Clinical Sciences Lund, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Bobby Tingstedt
- Department of Surgery, Clinical Sciences Lund, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Secanella L, Busquets J, Peláez N, Sorribas M, Laquente B, Ruiz S, Carnaval T, Videla S, Fabregat J. Predictive factors for resection and survival in type A borderline resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patients after neoadjuvant therapy: A retrospective cohort study. Medicine (Baltimore) 2022; 101:e32126. [PMID: 36482640 PMCID: PMC9726357 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000032126] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Pancreatic cancer is the seventh leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide, and surgical resection with radical intent remains the only potentially curative treatment option today. However, borderline resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (BR-PDAC) stand in the gray area between the resectable and unresectable disease since they are technically resectable but have a high probability of incomplete exeresis. Neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) plays an important role in ensuring resection success.Different survival prognostic factors for BR-PDAC have been well described, but evidence on the predictive factors associated with resection after NAT is scarce. This study aims to study if CA 19-9 plasmatic levels and the tumor anatomical relationship with neighboring vascular structures are prognostic factors for resection and survival (both Overall Survival and Progression-Free Survival) in patients with type A BR-PDAC. METHODS This will be a retrospective cohort study using data from type A BR-PDAC patients who received NAT in the Bellvitge University Hospital. The observation period is from January 2010 until December 2019; patients must have a minimum 12-month follow-up. Patients will be classified according to the MD Anderson Cancer Center criteria for BR-PDAC. DISCUSSION Patients with BR-PDAC have a high risk for a margin-positive resection. Serum Carbohydrate Antigen 19-9 plasmatic levels and vascular involvement stand out as disease-related prognostic factors.This study will provide valuable information on the prognostic factors associated with resection. We will exclude locally advanced tumors and expect this approach to provide more realistic resection rates without selecting those patients that undergo surgical exploration. However, focusing on an anatomical definition may limit the results' generalizability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luis Secanella
- Digestive and General Surgery Department, Bellvitge University Hospital, L’Hospitalet DE Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
- Research Group of Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Diseases, Institut d’Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge – IDIBELL, University of Barcelona, L’Hospitalet DE Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Juli Busquets
- Digestive and General Surgery Department, Bellvitge University Hospital, L’Hospitalet DE Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
- Research Group of Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Diseases, Institut d’Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge – IDIBELL, University of Barcelona, L’Hospitalet DE Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
- Departament de Ciències Clíniques, Facultat de Medicina i Ciències de la Salut, Universitat de Barcelona (UB), C. Casanova, Barcelona, Spain
- *Correspondence: Juli Busquets, Digestive and General Surgery Department, Bellvitge University Hospital, L’Hospitalet DE Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain (e-mail: )
| | - Núria Peláez
- Digestive and General Surgery Department, Bellvitge University Hospital, L’Hospitalet DE Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
- Research Group of Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Diseases, Institut d’Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge – IDIBELL, University of Barcelona, L’Hospitalet DE Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - María Sorribas
- Digestive and General Surgery Department, Bellvitge University Hospital, L’Hospitalet DE Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
- Research Group of Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Diseases, Institut d’Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge – IDIBELL, University of Barcelona, L’Hospitalet DE Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Berta Laquente
- Medical Oncology Department, Catalan Institute of Oncology, IDIBELL, L’Hospitalet DE Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Sandra Ruiz
- Radiology Department, Bellvitge University Hospital, L’Hospitalet DE Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Thiago Carnaval
- Pharmacology Unit, Department of Pathology and Experimental Therapeutics, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, IDIBELL, University of Barcelona, L’Hospitalet DE Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Sebastián Videla
- Pharmacology Unit, Department of Pathology and Experimental Therapeutics, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, IDIBELL, University of Barcelona, L’Hospitalet DE Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
- Clinical Research Support Unit (HUB·IDIBELL), Clinical Pharmacology Department, Bellvitge University Hospital, L´Hospitalet DE Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Juan Fabregat
- Digestive and General Surgery Department, Bellvitge University Hospital, L’Hospitalet DE Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
- Research Group of Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Diseases, Institut d’Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge – IDIBELL, University of Barcelona, L’Hospitalet DE Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
- Departament de Ciències Clíniques, Facultat de Medicina i Ciències de la Salut, Universitat de Barcelona (UB), C. Casanova, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
DiPeri TP, Newhook TE, Prakash LR, Ikoma N, Maxwell JE, Kim MP, Lee JE, Katz MH, Tzeng CWD. Prognostic significance of preoperative and postoperative CA 19-9 normalization in pancreatic adenocarcinoma treated with neoadjuvant therapy or surgery first. J Surg Oncol 2022; 126:1021-1027. [PMID: 35726394 PMCID: PMC9547830 DOI: 10.1002/jso.26989] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2022] [Revised: 06/08/2022] [Accepted: 06/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Normal(ization) of serum carbohydrate 19-9 (CA19-9) before/after surgery has not been compared in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) treated with neoadjuvant therapy (NT) versus surgery-first (SF). METHODS Characteristics for patients with PDAC who underwent resection from July 2011 to October 2018 were collected. Patients with pre-/postoperative CA19-9, bilirubin <2 mg/dL, and initial CA19-9 > 1 U/ml were included. Overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were compared by pre-/postoperative CA19-9. RESULTS In patients receiving NT, normal pre/postoperative CA19-9 ("NTnl/nl ") was associated with median RFS and OS (26 and 77mo), followed by those who normalized after surgery ("NTabnl/nl " 16 and 44mo). For SF patients, normal pre-/postoperative CA19-9 ("SFnl/nl ") was associated with median RFS and OS (115 and not estimable mo), followed by those who normalized after resection ("SFabnl/nl " 18 and 49mo). Groups "NTabnl/abnl " and "SFabnl/abnl " with elevated CA19-9 both before and after resection had the worst median RFS and OS durations. CONCLUSIONS While a normal(ized) postoperative CA19-9 may result in similar survival as preoperative normal(ization), postoperative normalization failed to occur in nearly 30% of SF patients. NT should be considered in patients presenting with elevated CA19-9. If considering SF, ideal patients may include those with normal CA19-9 at presentation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy P. DiPeri
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston TX
| | - Timothy E. Newhook
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston TX
| | - Laura R. Prakash
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston TX
| | - Naruhiko Ikoma
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston TX
| | - Jessica E. Maxwell
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston TX
| | - Michael P. Kim
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston TX
| | - Jeffrey E. Lee
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston TX
| | - Matthew H.G. Katz
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston TX
| | - Ching-Wei D. Tzeng
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston TX
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Puleo A, Malla M, Boone BA. Defining the Optimal Duration of Neoadjuvant Therapy for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: Time for a Personalized Approach? Pancreas 2022; 51:1083-1091. [PMID: 37078929 PMCID: PMC10144367 DOI: 10.1097/mpa.0000000000002147] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2022] [Accepted: 11/03/2022] [Indexed: 04/21/2023]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Despite recent advances, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) continues to be associated with dismal outcomes, with a cure evading most patients. While historic treatment for PDAC has been surgical resection followed by 6 months of adjuvant therapy, there has been a recent shift toward neoadjuvant treatment (NAT). Several considerations support this approach, including the characteristic early systemic spread of PDAC, and the morbidity often surrounding pancreatic resection, which can delay recovery and preclude patients from starting adjuvant treatment. The addition of NAT has been suggested to improve margin-negative resection rates, decrease lymph node positivity, and potentially translate to improved survival. Conversely, complications and disease progression can occur during preoperative treatment, potentially eliminating the chance of curative resection. As NAT utilization has increased, treatment durations have been found to vary widely between institutions with an optimal duration remaining undefined. In this review, we assess the existing literature on NAT for PDAC, reviewing treatment durations reported across retrospective case series and prospective clinical trials to establish currently used approaches and seek the optimal duration. We also analyze markers of treatment response and review the potential for personalized approaches that may help clarify this important treatment question and move NAT toward a more standardized approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda Puleo
- From the Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery
| | - Midhun Malla
- Section of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine
| | - Brian A. Boone
- From the Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Cell Biology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Choi JH, Kim MK, Lee SH, Park JW, Park N, Cho IR, Ryu JK, Kim YT, Jang JY, Kwon W, Kim H, Paik WH. Proper adjuvant therapy in patients with borderline resectable and locally advanced pancreatic cancer who had received neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX. Front Oncol 2022; 12:945829. [PMID: 36226066 PMCID: PMC9549517 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.945829] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2022] [Accepted: 08/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The complete resection rate of pancreatic cancer has increased because of the advent of efficacious first-line treatments for unresectable pancreatic cancer. Still, strategies regarding adjuvant therapy after neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX treatment remain to be established. Methods Data on 144 patients with borderline resectable and locally advanced pancreatic cancer who underwent resection after neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX between January 2013 and April 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Results Among the study patients, 113 patients (78.5%) were diagnosed with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer and 31 patients (21.5%) were diagnosed with locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Seventy-five patients (52.1%) received radiotherapy before surgery. After radical resection, 84 patients (58.3%) received 5-fluorouracil-based adjuvant therapy and 60 patients (41.7%) received non-5-fluorouracil-based adjuvant therapy. Adjuvant therapy with 5-fluorouracil-based regimen [hazard ratio (HR), 0.43 (95% CI, 0.21–0.87); p = 0.019], preoperative assessment as locally advanced pancreatic cancer [HR, 2.87 (95% CI, 1.08–7.64); p = 0.035], positive resection margin [HR, 3.91 (95% CI, 1.71–8.94); p = 0.001], and presence of pathologic lymph node involvement [HR, 2.31 (95% CI, 1.00–5.33), p = 0.050] were associated with decreased recurrence-free survival. Adjuvant therapy with 5-fluorouracil-based regimen [HR, 0.35 (95% CI, 0.15–0.84); p = 0.018], positive resection margin [HR, 4.14 (95% CI, 1.75–9.78); p = 0.001], presence of pathologic lymph node involvement [HR, 3.36 (95% CI, 1.23–9.15); p = 0.018], poor differentiation [HR, 5.69 (95% CI, 1.76–18.36); p = 0.004], and dose reduction during adjuvant therapy [HR, 1.78 (95% CI, 1.24–24.37); p = 0.025] were associated with decreased overall survival. Conclusions The 5-fluorouracil-based adjuvant therapy seems to be the proper adjuvant therapy for patients who received neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX for borderline resectable and locally advanced pancreatic cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jin Ho Choi
- Department of Internal Medicine and Liver Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Min Kyu Kim
- The Armed Forces Medical Command, Ministry of National Defense, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea
| | - Sang Hyub Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine and Liver Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Jin Woo Park
- Department of Pathology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Namyoung Park
- Department of Internal Medicine and Liver Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - In Rae Cho
- Department of Internal Medicine and Liver Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Ji Kon Ryu
- Department of Internal Medicine and Liver Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Yong-Tae Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine and Liver Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Jin-Young Jang
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Wooil Kwon
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Hongbeom Kim
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Woo Hyun Paik
- Department of Internal Medicine and Liver Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
- *Correspondence: Woo Hyun Paik,
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
O'Shea AE, Bohan PMK, Carpenter EL, McCarthy PM, Adams AM, Chick RC, Bader JO, Krell RW, Peoples GE, Clifton GT, Nelson DW, Vreeland TJ. Downstaging of Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma With Either Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy or Chemoradiotherapy Improves Survival. Ann Surg Oncol 2022; 29:6015-6028. [PMID: 35583691 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-11800-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2021] [Accepted: 04/05/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) or chemoradiation (NAC+XRT) is incorporated into the treatment of localized pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC), often with the goal of downstaging before resection. However, the effect of downstaging on overall survival, particularly the differential effects of NAC and NAC+XRT, remains undefined. This study examined the impact of downstaging from NAC and NAC+XRT on overall survival. METHODS The National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) was queried from 2006 to 2015 for patients with non-metastatic PDAC who received NAC or NAC+XRT. Rates of overall and nodal downstaging, and pathologic complete response (pCR) were assessed. Predictors of downstaging were evaluated using multivariable logistic regression. Overall survival (OS) was assessed with Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards modeling. RESULTS The study enrolled 2475 patients (975 NAC and 1500 NAC+XRT patients). Compared with NAC, NAC+XRT was associated with higher rates of overall downstaging (38.3 % vs 23.6 %; p ≤ 0.001), nodal downstaging (16.0 % vs 7.8 %; p ≤ 0.001), and pCR (1.7 % vs 0.7 %; p = 0.041). Receipt of NAC+XRT was independently predictive of overall (odds ratio [OR] 2.28; p < 0.001) and nodal (OR 3.09; p < 0.001) downstaging. Downstaging by either method was associated with improved 5-year OS (30.5 vs 25.2 months; p ≤ 0.001). Downstaging with NAC was associated with an 8-month increase in median OS (33.7 vs 25.6 months; p = 0.005), and downstaging by NAC+XRT was associated with a 5-month increase in median OS (30.0 vs 25.0 months; p = 0.008). Cox regression showed an association of overall downstaging with an 18 % reduction in the risk of death (hazard ratio [HR] 0.82; 95 % confidence interval, 0.71-0.95; p = 0.01) CONCLUSION: Downstaging after neoadjuvant therapies improves survival. The addition of radiation therapy may increase the rate of downstaging without affecting overall oncologic outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne E O'Shea
- Department of Surgery, Brooke Army Medical Center, Ft. Sam Houston, TX, USA.
| | | | | | - Patrick M McCarthy
- Department of Surgery, Brooke Army Medical Center, Ft. Sam Houston, TX, USA
| | - Alexandra M Adams
- Department of Surgery, Brooke Army Medical Center, Ft. Sam Houston, TX, USA
| | - Robert C Chick
- Department of Surgery, Brooke Army Medical Center, Ft. Sam Houston, TX, USA
| | - Julia O Bader
- Department of Surgery, William Beaumont Army Medical Center, El Paso, TX, USA
| | - Robert W Krell
- Department of Surgery, Brooke Army Medical Center, Ft. Sam Houston, TX, USA
| | | | - Guy T Clifton
- Department of Surgery, Brooke Army Medical Center, Ft. Sam Houston, TX, USA
| | - Daniel W Nelson
- Department of Surgery, William Beaumont Army Medical Center, El Paso, TX, USA
| | - Timothy J Vreeland
- Department of Surgery, Brooke Army Medical Center, Ft. Sam Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
AlMasri S, Zenati M, Hammad A, Nassour I, Liu H, Hogg ME, Zeh HJ, Boone B, Bahary N, Singhi AD, Lee KK, Paniccia A, Zureikat AH. Adaptive Dynamic Therapy and Survivorship for Operable Pancreatic Cancer. JAMA Netw Open 2022; 5:e2218355. [PMID: 35737385 PMCID: PMC9227002 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.18355] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2022] [Accepted: 05/05/2022] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Importance Neoadjuvant therapy is increasingly used in localized pancreatic carcinoma, and survival is correlated with carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) levels and histopathologic response following neoadjuvant therapy. With several regimens now available, the choice of chemotherapy could be best dictated by response to neoadjuvant therapy (as measured by CA19-9 levels and/or pathologic response), a strategy defined herein as adaptive dynamic therapy. Objective To evaluate the association of adaptive dynamic therapy with oncologic outcomes in patients with surgically resected pancreatic cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants This retrospective cohort study included patients with localized pancreatic cancer who were treated with either gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel or fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin (FOLFIRINOX) preoperatively between 2010 and 2019 at a high-volume tertiary care academic center. Participants were identified from a prospectively maintained database and had a median follow-up of 49 months. Data were analyzed from October 17 to November 24, 2020. Exposures The adaptive dynamic therapy group included 219 patients who remained on or switched to an alternative regimen as dictated by CA19-9 response and for whom the adjuvant regimen was selected based on CA19-9 and/or pathologic response. The nonadaptive dynamic therapy group included 103 patients who had their chemotherapeutic regimen selected independent of CA19-9 and/or tumoral response. Main Outcomes and Measures Prognostic implications of dynamic perioperative therapy assessed through Kaplan-Meier analysis, Cox regression, and inverse probability weighted estimators. Results A total of 322 consecutive patients (mean [SD] age, 65.1 [9] years; 162 [50%] women) were identified. The adaptive dynamic therapy group, compared with the nonadaptive dynamic therapy group, had a more pronounced median (IQR) decrease in CA19-9 levels (-80% [-92% to -56%] vs -45% [-81% to -13%]; P < .001), higher incidence of complete or near-complete tumoral response (25 [12%] vs 2 [2%]; P = .007), and lower median (IQR) number of lymph node metastasis (1 [0 to 4] vs 2 [0 to 4]; P = .046). Overall survival was significantly improved in the dynamic group compared with the nondynamic group (38.7 months [95% CI, 34.0 to 46.7 months] vs 26.5 months [95% CI, 23.5 to 32.9 months]; P = .03), and on adjusted analysis, dynamic therapy was independently associated with improved survival (hazard ratio, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.53 to 0.99; P = .04). On inverse probability weighted analysis of 320 matched patients, the average treatment effect of dynamic therapy was to increase overall survival by 11.1 months (95% CI, 1.5 to 20.7 months; P = .02). Conclusions and Relevance In this cohort study that sought to evaluate the role of adaptive dynamic therapy in localized pancreatic cancer, selecting a chemotherapeutic regimen based on response to preoperative therapy was associated with improved survival. These findings support an individualized and in vivo assessment of response to perioperative therapy in pancreatic cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samer AlMasri
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Mazen Zenati
- Department of Surgery, Epidemiology, Clinical and Translational Science, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Abdulrahman Hammad
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | | | - Hao Liu
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Melissa E. Hogg
- Department of Surgery, NorthShore Hospital System, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Herbert J. Zeh
- Department of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas
| | - Brian Boone
- Department of Surgery, West Virginia University, Morgantown
| | - Nathan Bahary
- Department of Internal Medicine, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Aatur D. Singhi
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Kenneth K. Lee
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | | | - Amer H. Zureikat
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Suto H, Okano K, Oshima M, Ando Y, Matsukawa H, Takahashi S, Shibata T, Kamada H, Kobara H, Tsuji A, Masaki T, Suzuki Y. Efficacy and Safety of Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation Therapy Administered for 5 Versus 2 Weeks for Resectable and Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer. Pancreas 2022; 51:269-277. [PMID: 35584385 DOI: 10.1097/mpa.0000000000002011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/10/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Indications of preoperative treatment for resectable (R-) or borderline resectable (BR-) pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) are unclear, and the protocol remains to be standardized. METHODS Included 65 patients with R- and BR-PDAC with venous involvement (V-) received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with S-1 and 50 Gy of radiation as the 5-week regimen. The outcomes of this group were compared with those of 52 patients who underwent S-1 and 30 Gy of radiation as the 2-week regimen, previously collected as our prospective phase II study. RESULTS Compared with the 2-week regimen, there were no significant differences in the rate of protocol completion, adverse events, mortality and morbidity, or R0 resection in the 5-week regimen. In subgroup analyses of R-PDAC, there were no significant differences in overall survival and recurrence-free survival between the groups. In contrast, the 5-week regimen had significantly better overall survival and recurrence-free survival than the 2-week regimen for BRV-PDAC. Similar results were observed after propensity score matching analysis. CONCLUSIONS The 5-week regimen of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy has good clinical efficacy and safety for R- and BRV-PDAC. The 5-week regimen could achieve better outcomes than the 2-week regimen for BRV-PDAC. In contrast, both regimens achieved similar outcomes for R-PDAC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Akihito Tsuji
- Clinical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Kagawa University, Kagawa, Japan
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Vanek P, Eid M, Psar R, Zoundjiekpon V, Urban O, Kunovský L. Current trends in the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. VNITRNI LEKARSTVI 2022; 68:363-370. [PMID: 36316197 DOI: 10.36290/vnl.2022.076] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a dreaded malignancy with a dismal 5-year survival rate despite maximal efforts on optimizing treatment strategies. Currently, early detection is considered to be the most effective way to improve survival as radical resection is the only potential cure. PDAC is often divided into four categories based on the extent of disease: resectable, borderline resectable, locally advanced, and metastatic. Unfortunately, the majority of patients are diagnosed with locally advanced or metastatic disease, which renders them ineligible for curative resection. This is mainly due to the lack of or vague symptoms while the disease is still localized, although appropriate utilization and prompt availability of adequate diagnostic tools is also critical given the aggressive nature of the disease. A cost-effective biomarker with high specificity and sensitivity allowing early detection of PDAC without the need for advanced or invasive methods is still not available. This leaves the diagnosis dependent on radiodiagnostic methods or endoscopic ultrasound. Here we summarize the latest epidemiological data, risk factors, clinical manifestation, and current diagnostic trends and implications of PDAC focusing on serum biomarkers and imaging modalities. Additionally, up-to-date management and therapeutic algorithms are outlined.
Collapse
|
26
|
Oppliger FA, Prakash LR, Newhook TE, Chiang YJ, Ikoma N, Maxwell JE, Kim MP, Vauthey JN, Lee JE, Katz MH, Tzeng CWD. AJCC 8th edition pathologic nodal staging of resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma predicts survival regardless of treatment sequencing. Surg Oncol 2021; 40:101673. [PMID: 34894620 DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2021.101673] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2021] [Revised: 09/29/2021] [Accepted: 11/14/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The primary aim was to compare overall survival (OS) between neoadjuvant therapy (NT) and surgery-first (SF) patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) by nodal stage using the American Joint Commission on Cancer 8th Edition (AJCC8). BACKGROUND Rates of nodal positivity are consistently lower following NT versus SF sequencing. It's unclear whether post-NT nodal stage (ypNx) has similar survival compared to SF (pNx) using AJCC8. METHODS This is a single-institution retrospective cohort study with routine consideration of NT. Patients undergoing PDAC resection from 2010 to 2018 were analyzed and OS compared by nodal stage using AJCC8. RESULTS Of 450 total patients, 24% were treated with SF and 76% NT. SF patients had potentially resectable disease in 97% of the cases, whereas NT patients had more advanced clinical stages at diagnosis: borderline resectable 34%, locally advanced 5%. NT patients had higher rates of node-negativity (52.4% vs 22.7%) and lower rates of pathologic N2 disease (19.1% vs 43.6%) vs. SF (p < 0.001). For each pathologic nodal stage, SF and NT groups had similar 5-year OS [pN0/ypN0 52.7% vs. 53.6%, p = 0.723], [pN1/ypN1 37.0% vs. 36.7%, p = 0.872], and [pN2/ypN2 16.6% vs. 21.0%, p = 0.508]. CONCLUSIONS AJCC8 stratifies outcomes for each post-NT nodal stage similar to SF counterparts. Despite presenting with more advanced clinical stage, NT patients had lower rates of nodal metastases yet comparable OS when stratified by final nodal status. These data provide both hope for patients with obvious radiographic nodal disease at presentation and further support for considering NT sequencing for most patients diagnosed with localized PDAC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Federico A Oppliger
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Laura R Prakash
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Timothy E Newhook
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Yi-Ju Chiang
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Naruhiko Ikoma
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jessica E Maxwell
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Michael P Kim
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jean-Nicolas Vauthey
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jeffrey E Lee
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Matthew H Katz
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ching-Wei D Tzeng
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Tezuka K, Okamura Y, Sugiura T, Ito T, Yamamoto Y, Ashida R, Ohgi K, Otsuka S, Todaka A, Fukutomi A, Uesaka K. Predictive factors of survival in patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer who received neoadjuvant therapy. Pancreatology 2021; 21:1451-1459. [PMID: 34462214 DOI: 10.1016/j.pan.2021.08.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2021] [Revised: 07/27/2021] [Accepted: 08/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES This study aimed to develop the prognostic score (PS) based on clinical factors to stratify the prognosis in borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC) patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy (NAT). METHODS This retrospective study included 57 BRPC patients who received NAT between April 2012 and December 2017. A score was assigned to each prognostic factor available before and after NAT, according to their β coefficients. RESULTS Multivariate analysis identified the following six prognostic factors, and scores were assigned as follows: being a familial PC patient (HR 4.98, p = 0.029), post-NAT CA19-9 ≥37 U/ml (HR 3.08, p = 0.020), reduction rate of CA19-9 <70% (HR 3.71, p = 0.008), pre-NAT neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio ≥2.8 (HR 4.32, p = 0.003), and non-resection (HR 3.98, p = 0.009) were scored as 1; and post-NAT albumin-to-globulin ratio <1.33 (HR 8.31, p < 0.001) was scored as 2. The PS was calculated by summing the scores assigned to each prognostic factor. Patients were then classified into three risk groups (low- [0-1 points], moderate- [2-3 points], and high-risk [4-6 points] groups). Median overall survival in the low-, moderate-, and high-risk groups were not reached, 37.5 months, and 11.8 months, respectively, and there were significant differences in survival among the three groups (p < 0.01 in each group). CONCLUSIONS This study showed that the PS may be useful for predicting the prognosis of BRPC patients treated with NAT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Koji Tezuka
- Division of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Yukiyasu Okamura
- Division of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan.
| | - Teiichi Sugiura
- Division of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Takaaki Ito
- Division of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Yusuke Yamamoto
- Division of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Ryo Ashida
- Division of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Katsuhisa Ohgi
- Division of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Shimpei Otsuka
- Division of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Akiko Todaka
- Division of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Akira Fukutomi
- Division of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Katsuhiko Uesaka
- Division of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Okada K, Uemura K, Kondo N, Sumiyoshi T, Seo S, Otsuka H, Serikawa M, Ishii Y, Tsuboi T, Murakami Y, Takahashi S. Neoadjuvant therapy contributes to nodal downstaging of pancreatic cancer. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2021; 407:623-632. [PMID: 34609618 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-021-02339-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2021] [Accepted: 09/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aimed to assess the impact of neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) for borderline resectable or locally advanced pancreatic cancer (BR/LAPC) on the American Joint Commission on Cancer (AJCC) nodal status. METHODS The medical records of BR/LAPC patients who underwent surgery with curative intent were retrospectively reviewed. The nodal status was compared between patients who underwent upfront surgery (UFS) and those who received NAT. Moreover, clinicopathological factors and prognostic factors for overall survival were analyzed. RESULTS In all, 200 patients with BR/LAPC, 78 with UFS, and 122 with NAT were enrolled. The nodal status was significantly lower in patients after NAT than after UFS (p = 0.011). A multivariate analysis of overall survival showed that UFS (hazard ratio (HR) 1.61, p = 0.024) and N2 status (HR 2.69, p < 0.001) were independent poor prognostic factors. The median serum carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9 level after NAT in N2 patients was 105 U/mL, which was significantly higher than that of patients with N0 (p = 0.004) and N1 (p = 0.008) status. CONCLUSION Patients with BR/LAPC who underwent surgery after NAT had significantly lower N2 status and better prognosis than patients who underwent UFS. Elevated CA19-9 levels after NAT indicated a higher nodal status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kenjiro Okada
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Kasumi 1-2-3, Minami-ku, Hiroshima, 734-8551, Japan
| | - Kenichiro Uemura
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Kasumi 1-2-3, Minami-ku, Hiroshima, 734-8551, Japan.
| | - Naru Kondo
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Kasumi 1-2-3, Minami-ku, Hiroshima, 734-8551, Japan
| | - Tatsuaki Sumiyoshi
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Kasumi 1-2-3, Minami-ku, Hiroshima, 734-8551, Japan
| | - Shingo Seo
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Kasumi 1-2-3, Minami-ku, Hiroshima, 734-8551, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Otsuka
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Kasumi 1-2-3, Minami-ku, Hiroshima, 734-8551, Japan
| | - Masahiro Serikawa
- Department of Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Yasutaka Ishii
- Department of Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Tomofumi Tsuboi
- Department of Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Yoshiaki Murakami
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Kasumi 1-2-3, Minami-ku, Hiroshima, 734-8551, Japan
| | - Shinya Takahashi
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Kasumi 1-2-3, Minami-ku, Hiroshima, 734-8551, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a relatively uncommon cancer, with approximately 60 430 new diagnoses expected in 2021 in the US. The incidence of PDAC is increasing by 0.5% to 1.0% per year, and it is projected to become the second-leading cause of cancer-related mortality by 2030. OBSERVATIONS Effective screening is not available for PDAC, and most patients present with locally advanced (30%-35%) or metastatic (50%-55%) disease at diagnosis. A multidisciplinary management approach is recommended. Localized pancreas cancer includes resectable, borderline resectable (localized and involving major vascular structures), and locally advanced (unresectable) disease based on the degree of arterial and venous involvement by tumor, typically of the superior mesenteric vessels. For patients with resectable disease at presentation (10%-15%), surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy with FOLFIRINOX (fluorouracil, irinotecan, leucovorin, oxaliplatin) represents a standard therapeutic approach with an anticipated median overall survival of 54.4 months, compared with 35 months for single-agent gemcitabine (stratified hazard ratio for death, 0.64 [95% CI, 0.48-0.86]; P = .003). Neoadjuvant systemic therapy with or without radiation followed by evaluation for surgery is an accepted treatment approach for resectable and borderline resectable disease. For patients with locally advanced and unresectable disease due to extensive vascular involvement, systemic therapy followed by radiation is an option for definitive locoregional disease control. For patients with advanced (locally advanced and metastatic) PDAC, multiagent chemotherapy regimens, including FOLFIRINOX, gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel, and nanoliposomal irinotecan/fluorouracil, all have a survival benefit of 2 to 6 months compared with a single-agent gemcitabine. For the 5% to 7% of patients with a BRCA pathogenic germline variant and metastatic PDAC, olaparib, a poly (adenosine diphosphate [ADB]-ribose) polymerase inhibitor, is a maintenance option that improves progression-free survival following initial platinum-based therapy. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Approximately 60 000 new cases of PDAC are diagnosed per year, and approximately 50% of patients have advanced disease at diagnosis. The incidence of PDAC is increasing. Currently available cytotoxic therapies for advanced disease are modestly effective. For all patients, multidisciplinary management, comprehensive germline testing, and integrated supportive care are recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wungki Park
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- David M. Rubenstein Center for Pancreatic Cancer Research, New York, New York
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
- Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, San Francisco, California
| | - Akhil Chawla
- Department of Surgery, Northwestern Medicine Regional Medical Group, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
- Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Eileen M O'Reilly
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- David M. Rubenstein Center for Pancreatic Cancer Research, New York, New York
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Tomishima K, Ishii S, Fujisawa T, Ikemura M, Ota H, Kabemura D, Ushio M, Fukuma T, Takahashi S, Yamagata W, Takasaki Y, Suzuki A, Ito K, Saito H, Nagahara A, Isayama H. Duration of Reduced CA19-9 Levels Is a Better Prognostic Factor Than Its Rate of Reduction for Unresectable Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13164224. [PMID: 34439377 PMCID: PMC8391823 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13164224] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2021] [Revised: 08/16/2021] [Accepted: 08/20/2021] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Upon diagnosis, about 35% of patients have initially unresectable locally advanced pancreatic cancer. The prognosis of these patients is still poor. Chemotherapy alone has been generally accepted as a standard therapeutic approach. However, clinical decision-making processes have not been established for aggressive treatments such as surgery and chemoradiotherapy in patients with a response and stable case of initially unresectable locally advanced pancreatic cancer. In the current study, we evaluated the reduction rate and duration of carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9 within 6 months as long-term survival. Cases of over 44% CA 19-9 reduction only one month from the baseline after treatment were not significantly associated with overall survival. On the other hand, more than 3 months of over 44% CA 19-9 reduction was significantly associated with prognosis, which is the same as the occurrence of distant metastasis. Multidisciplinary treatment focus on local treatment is expected in these selected patients. Abstract A decrease in carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9 levels has been proposed as a prognostic marker for survival and recurrence in patients with pancreatic cancer. We evaluated the association between duration of reduced CA 19-9 levels during 6 months after treatment and long-term survival for 79 patients with unresectable locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). We calculated the differences between pretreatment and monthly CA19-9 levels. We categorized 71 patients with decreases in CA19-9 levels into three groups based on the duration of these reduced levels (>2, >3, and >4 months). The cut-off level for long-term (more than 2 years) survival was identified as a 44% reduction from the baseline, using a ROC curve. A reduction duration >2 months was not associated with overall survival (p = 0.1), while >3 months was significantly associated with survival (p =.04). In multivariate analysis, a reduction duration >3 months predicted a good long-term prognosis (odds ratio = 5.75; 95% confidence interval = 1.47–22.36; p < 0.01). In patients with unresectable LAPC, the duration of reduced CA19-9 levels for more than 3 months, rather than the rate of reduction in CA19-9 levels, during 6 months after treatment was significantly associated with good prognosis.
Collapse
|
31
|
Nurmi AM, Mustonen H, Haglund C, Seppänen H. Changes in CRP and CA19-9 during Preoperative Oncological Therapy Predict Postoperative Survival in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. Oncology 2021; 99:686-698. [PMID: 34412062 DOI: 10.1159/000517835] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2021] [Accepted: 06/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Tumor and systemic inflammatory markers predict survival. This retrospective study aimed to explore the changes in CRP, CA19-9, and other routine laboratory tests during preoperative oncological therapy as prognostic factors in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). METHODS Between 2000 and 2016, 68 borderline resectable PDAC patients received preoperative oncological therapy and underwent subsequent surgery at Helsinki University Hospital, Finland. We investigated changes in CRP, CA19-9, CEA, albumin, leukocytes, bilirubin, and platelets and examined the impact on survival. RESULTS In the multivariate analysis, CRP remaining at ≥3 mg/L after preoperative oncological therapy predicted a poorer postoperative outcome when compared to CRP decreasing to or remaining at <3 mg/L (hazard ratio [HR] 2.766, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.300-5.885, p = 0.008). Furthermore, a CA19-9 decrease >90% during preoperative treatment predicted a favorable postoperative outcome (HR 0.297, 95% CI: 0.124-0.708, p = 0.006). In the Kaplan-Meier analysis, the median survival for patients with CRP remaining at <3 mg/L was longer than among patients with an increased CRP level at ≥3 mg/L (42 months vs. 24 months, p = 0.001). Patients with a CA19-9 decrease >90% or level normalization (to ≤37 kU/L) during preoperative treatment exhibited a median survival of 47 months; those with a 50-90% decrease, 15 months; and those with a <50% decrease, 17 months (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Changes in CRP and CA19-9 during preoperative oncological therapy predict postoperative survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Maria Nurmi
- Department of Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Harri Mustonen
- Department of Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Caj Haglund
- Department of Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.,Translational Cancer Medicine Research Program, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Hanna Seppänen
- Department of Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.,Translational Cancer Medicine Research Program, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Hamad A, Brown ZJ, Ejaz AM, Dillhoff M, Cloyd JM. Neoadjuvant therapy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: Opportunities for personalized cancer care. World J Gastroenterol 2021; 27:4383-4394. [PMID: 34366611 PMCID: PMC8316910 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v27.i27.4383] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2021] [Revised: 04/12/2021] [Accepted: 07/05/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is an aggressive malignancy that is best treated in a multidisciplinary fashion using surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation. Adjuvant chemotherapy has shown to have a significant survival benefit in patients with resected PDAC. However, up to 50% of patients fail to receive adjuvant chemotherapy due to postoperative complications, poor patient performance status or early disease progression. In order to ensure the delivery of chemotherapy, an alternative strategy is to administer systemic treatment prior to surgery. Precision oncology refers to the application of diverse strategies to target therapies specific to characteristics of a patient’s cancer. While traditionally emphasized in selecting targeted therapies based on molecular, genetic, and radiographic biomarkers for patients with metastatic disease, the neoadjuvant setting is a prime opportunity to utilize personalized approaches. In this article, we describe the current evidence for the use of neoadjuvant therapy (NT) and highlight unique opportunities for personalized care in patients with PDAC undergoing NT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmad Hamad
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43215, United States
| | - Zachary J Brown
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43215, United States
| | - Aslam M Ejaz
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43215, United States
| | - Mary Dillhoff
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43215, United States
| | - Jordan M Cloyd
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43215, United States
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Benz MR, Armstrong WR, Ceci F, Polverari G, Donahue TR, Wainberg ZA, Quon A, Auerbach M, Girgis MD, Herrmann K, Czernin J, Calais J. 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging biomarkers for early and late evaluation of response to first-line chemotherapy in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. J Nucl Med 2021; 63:199-204. [PMID: 34272317 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.121.261952] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2021] [Revised: 05/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate 18F-FDG-PET/CT as an early and late interim imaging biomarker in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) who undergo first-line systemic therapy. Methods: This was a prospective, single-center, single-arm, open-label study (IRB12-000770). Patient receiving first line chemotherapy were planned to undergo a baseline 18F-FDG-PET/CT (PET1), early interim 18F-FDG PET/CT (PET2) and late interim 18F-FDG-PET/CT (PET3). ROC selected and established (mPERCIST / RECIST1.1) cut-offs for metabolic and radiographic tumor response assessment were applied. Patients were followed to collect data on further treatments and overall survival (OS). Results: The study population consisted of 28 patients who underwent PET1. Twenty-three of these (82%) underwent PET2 and 21 (75%) PET3, respectively. Twenty-three deaths occurred during a median follow up period of 14 months (maximum follow up, 58.3 months). The median OS was 36.2 months (95%CI, 28-NYR) in early metabolic responders (6/23 (26%), P = 0.016) and 25.4 months (95%CI, 19.6-NYR) in early radiographic responders (7/23 (30%), P = 0.16). The median overall survival was 27.4 months (95%CI, 21.4-NYR) in late metabolic responders (10/21 (48%), P = 0.058) and 58.2 months (95%CI, 21.4-NYR) in late radiographic responders (7/21 (33%), P = 0.008). Conclusion: 18F-FDG PET may serve as early interim imaging biomarker (~ at 4 weeks) for evaluation of response to first-line chemotherapy in patients with PDAC. Radiographic changes might be sufficient for response evaluation after the completion of first line chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthias R Benz
- Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Wesley R Armstrong
- Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Francesco Ceci
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | | | | | - Zev A Wainberg
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Andrew Quon
- Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Martin Auerbach
- Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Mark D Girgis
- Department of Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Ken Herrmann
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Johannes Czernin
- Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Jeremie Calais
- Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Rieser CJ, Narayanan S, Bahary N, Bartlett DL, Lee KK, Paniccia A, Smith K, Zureikat AH. Optimal management of patients with operable pancreatic head cancer: A Markov decision analysis. J Surg Oncol 2021; 124:801-809. [PMID: 34231222 DOI: 10.1002/jso.26589] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2021] [Accepted: 06/11/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) is an emerging strategy for operable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). While NAT increases multimodal therapy completion, it risks functional decline and treatment dropout. We used decision analysis to determine optimal management of localized PDAC and consider risks faced by elderly patients. METHODS A Markov cohort decision analysis model evaluated treatment options for a 60-year-old patient with resectable PDAC: (1) upfront pancreaticoduodenectomy or (2) NAT. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed. A subanalysis considered the scenario of a 75-year-old patient. RESULTS For the base case, NAT offered an incremental survival gain of 4.6 months compared with SF (overall survival: 26.3 vs. 21.7 months). In one-way sensitivity analyses, findings were sensitive to recurrence-free survival for NAT patients undergoing adjuvant, probability of completing NAT, and probability of being resectable at exploration after NAT. On probabilistic analysis, NAT was favored in a majority of trials (97%) with a median survival benefit of 5.1 months. In altering the base case for the 75-year-old scenario, NAT had a survival benefit of 3.8 months. CONCLUSIONS This analysis demonstrates a significant benefit to NAT in patients with localized PDAC. This benefit persists even in the elderly cohort.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline J Rieser
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Sowmya Narayanan
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Nathan Bahary
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - David L Bartlett
- AHN Cancer Institute, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Kenneth K Lee
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Alessandro Paniccia
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Kenneth Smith
- Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Amer H Zureikat
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Diab HMH, Smith HG, Jensen KK, Jørgensen LN. The current role of blood-based biomarkers in surgical decision-making in patients with localised pancreatic cancer: A systematic review. Eur J Cancer 2021; 154:73-81. [PMID: 34243080 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.05.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2021] [Revised: 05/20/2021] [Accepted: 05/23/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The role of blood-based biomarkers in surgical decision-making in patients with localised pancreatic cancer remains unclear. This review aimed to report the utility of blood-based biomarkers focusing on prediction of response to neoadjuvant therapy, prediction of surgical resectability and early relapse after surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase and Web of Science were searched till October 2019. Studies published between January 2000 and September 2019 with a minimum of 20 patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma, reporting the utility of at least one blood-based biomarker in predicting response to neoadjuvant therapy and predicting surgical resectability or early relapse after surgery were included. RESULTS A total of 2604 studies were identified, of which 24 comprising of 3367 patients and 12 blood-based biomarkers were included. All included studies were observational. Levels of carbohydrate antigen (CA)19-9 were reported in the majority of the studies. Levels of CA19-9 predicted the response to neoadjuvant therapy and early relapse in 10 studies. CA125 levels above 35 U/ml were predictive of surgical irresectability in two studies. However, marked variation in both timing of sampling and cut-off values was noted between studies. CONCLUSION Despite some evidence of potential benefit, the utility of currently available blood-based biomarkers in aiding surgical decision-making in patients undergoing potentially curative treatment for pancreatic cancer is limited by methodological heterogeneity. Standardisation of future studies may allow a more comprehensive analysis of the biomarkers described in this review.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hadi M H Diab
- Digestive Disease Center, Bispebjerg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
| | - Henry G Smith
- Digestive Disease Center, Bispebjerg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Kristian K Jensen
- Digestive Disease Center, Bispebjerg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Lars N Jørgensen
- Digestive Disease Center, Bispebjerg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Wei M, Gu B, Song S, Zhang B, Wang W, Xu J, Yu X, Shi S. A Novel Validated Recurrence Stratification System Based on 18F-FDG PET/CT Radiomics to Guide Surveillance After Resection of Pancreatic Cancer. Front Oncol 2021; 11:650266. [PMID: 34055620 PMCID: PMC8149949 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.650266] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2021] [Accepted: 04/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
objective Despite the heterogeneous biology of pancreatic cancer, similar surveillance schemas have been used. Identifying the high recurrence risk population and conducting prompt intervention may improve prognosis and prolong overall survival. Methods One hundred fifty-six resectable pancreatic cancer patients who had undergone 18F-FDG PET/CT from January 2013 to December 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. The patients were categorized into a training cohort (n = 109) and a validation cohort (n = 47). LIFEx software was used to extract radiomic features from PET/CT. The risk stratification system was based on predictive factors for recurrence, and the index of prediction accuracy was used to reflect both the discrimination and calibration. Results Overall, seven risk factors comprising the rad-score and clinical variables that were significantly correlated with relapse were incorporated into the final risk stratification system. The 1-year recurrence-free survival differed significantly among the low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups (85.5, 24.0, and 9.1%, respectively; p < 0.0001). The C-index of the risk stratification system in the development cohort was 0.890 (95% CI, 0.835-0.945). Conclusion The 18F-FDG PET/CT-based radiomic features and clinicopathological factors demonstrated good performance in predicting recurrence after pancreatectomy in pancreatic cancer patients, providing a strong recommendation for an adequate adjuvant therapy course in all patients. The high-risk recurrence population should proceed with closer follow-up in a clinical setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miaoyan Wei
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Pancreatic Cancer Multidisciplinary Center, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Medical College, Shanghai, China.,Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,Shanghai Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Shanghai, China
| | - Bingxin Gu
- Department of Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Medical College, Shanghai, China.,Department of Nuclear Medicine, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Center for Biomedical Imaging, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Shaoli Song
- Department of Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Medical College, Shanghai, China.,Department of Nuclear Medicine, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Center for Biomedical Imaging, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Bo Zhang
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Pancreatic Cancer Multidisciplinary Center, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Medical College, Shanghai, China.,Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,Shanghai Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Shanghai, China
| | - Wei Wang
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Pancreatic Cancer Multidisciplinary Center, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Medical College, Shanghai, China.,Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,Shanghai Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Shanghai, China
| | - Jin Xu
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Pancreatic Cancer Multidisciplinary Center, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Medical College, Shanghai, China.,Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,Shanghai Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Shanghai, China
| | - Xianjun Yu
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Pancreatic Cancer Multidisciplinary Center, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Medical College, Shanghai, China.,Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,Shanghai Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Shanghai, China
| | - Si Shi
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Pancreatic Cancer Multidisciplinary Center, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Medical College, Shanghai, China.,Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,Shanghai Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Akita H, Takahashi H, Eguchi H, Asukai K, Hasegawa S, Wada H, Iwagami Y, Yamada D, Tomimaru Y, Noda T, Gotoh K, Kobayashi S, Doki Y, Sakon M. Difference between carbohydrate antigen 19-9 and fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in evaluating the treatment efficacy of neoadjuvant treatment in patients with resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: Results of a dual-center study. Ann Gastroenterol Surg 2021; 5:381-389. [PMID: 34095729 PMCID: PMC8164457 DOI: 10.1002/ags3.12418] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2020] [Revised: 11/19/2020] [Accepted: 11/27/2020] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND An accurate evaluation of neoadjuvant treatment is important to maximize the prognostic benefit of this strategy in each individual patient. The main aim of the present study is to investigate the difference between carbohydrate antigen 19-9 and fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) in evaluating the response to neoadjuvant treatment for resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients. METHODS Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patients with positive standard uptake values (SUV) on FDG-PET before neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACRT) were enrolled (n = 141). In all patients, CA19-9 and FDG-PET were evaluated before the initiation of and after the completion of NACRT. The statuses of CA19-9 and FDG uptake alterations during NACRT were assessed in association with survival and tumor recurrence profiles. RESULTS A favorable response in each CA19-9 and FDG-PET was significantly related to better survival, respectively, than the unfavorable response (44.3% vs 19.5%, P < .001 and 45.8% vs 24.6%, P < .001). The status of CA19-9 was significantly associated with the incidence of distant recurrence whereas the status of FDG-PET was significantly associated with the incidence of local recurrence, and only patients with a favorable response in both CA19-9 and PET statuses showed a significantly better survival than the others (5-year survival: 56% vs 24%, P < .001), and those with unfavorable response in either of CA19-9 or PET status showed similar poor survival to those with unfavorable in both (P = .164). CONCLUSION CA19-9 and PET evaluation provided oncologically different risk assessments in terms of tumor recurrence profile, and favorable response in both CA19-9 and FDG-PET were necessary to achieve prognostic benefit from NACRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hirofumi Akita
- Department of SurgeryOsaka International Cancer InstituteOsakaJapan
- Department of Gastroenterological SurgeryOsaka University Graduate School of MedicineOsakaJapan
| | | | - Hidetoshi Eguchi
- Department of Gastroenterological SurgeryOsaka University Graduate School of MedicineOsakaJapan
| | - Kei Asukai
- Department of SurgeryOsaka International Cancer InstituteOsakaJapan
| | | | - Hiroshi Wada
- Department of SurgeryOsaka International Cancer InstituteOsakaJapan
| | - Yoshifumi Iwagami
- Department of Gastroenterological SurgeryOsaka University Graduate School of MedicineOsakaJapan
| | - Daisaku Yamada
- Department of Gastroenterological SurgeryOsaka University Graduate School of MedicineOsakaJapan
| | - Yoshito Tomimaru
- Department of Gastroenterological SurgeryOsaka University Graduate School of MedicineOsakaJapan
| | - Takehiro Noda
- Department of Gastroenterological SurgeryOsaka University Graduate School of MedicineOsakaJapan
| | - Kunihito Gotoh
- Department of Gastroenterological SurgeryOsaka University Graduate School of MedicineOsakaJapan
| | - Shogo Kobayashi
- Department of Gastroenterological SurgeryOsaka University Graduate School of MedicineOsakaJapan
| | - Yuichiro Doki
- Department of Gastroenterological SurgeryOsaka University Graduate School of MedicineOsakaJapan
| | - Masato Sakon
- Department of SurgeryOsaka International Cancer InstituteOsakaJapan
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Vitello DJ, Bentrem DJ. A review of response in neoadjuvant therapy for exocrine pancreatic cancer. J Surg Oncol 2021; 123:1449-1459. [PMID: 33831249 DOI: 10.1002/jso.26369] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2020] [Accepted: 12/27/2020] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Despite overall advances in cancer therapy, patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma continue to have a poor prognosis. While adjuvant therapy is still considered standard, there is mounting evidence that neoadjuvant therapy confers similar benefits in patients with locally advanced disease. The primary measures of response are radiographic, biochemical, margin status, and pathologic. Given overall low response rates and the need for new treatment strategies, standard metrics remain important to the investigation of new systemic agents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dominic J Vitello
- Department of Surgery, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - David J Bentrem
- Department of Surgery, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Gaskill CE, Maxwell J, Ikoma N, Kim MP, Tzeng CW, Lee JE, Katz MHG. History of preoperative therapy for pancreatic cancer and the MD Anderson experience. J Surg Oncol 2021; 123:1414-1422. [PMID: 33831256 DOI: 10.1002/jso.26394] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2021] [Accepted: 01/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Systemic chemotherapy improves the survival of patients who undergo pancreatectomy, but whether chemotherapy should be delivered before or after surgery remains debated. At The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, localized pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has been preferentially treated with preoperative therapy-a practice supported by a robust history of institutional and national trials. In the following review, we discuss the historical use of perioperative therapy, our experience with it at MD Anderson Cancer Center and internationally, and the future of treatment and trials for PDAC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cameron E Gaskill
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Jessica Maxwell
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Naruhiko Ikoma
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Michael P Kim
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Ching-Wei Tzeng
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Jeffrey E Lee
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Matthew H G Katz
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Preoperative risk factors for para-aortic lymph node positivity in pancreatic cancer. Pancreatology 2021; 21:606-612. [PMID: 33648880 DOI: 10.1016/j.pan.2021.01.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2020] [Revised: 01/27/2021] [Accepted: 01/29/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aimed to identify the preoperative risk factors for para-aortic lymph node (PALN) positivity, including micrometastasis, in pancreatic cancer. METHODS Medical records of patients with pancreatic cancer who underwent curative resection were retrospectively reviewed, and the relationships between preoperative risk factors and PALN positivity were identified. Clinicopathological and prognostic factors for overall survival were analyzed. Micrometastasis was investigated by immunohistochemistry. RESULTS 400 patients were enrolled. PALN positivity by hematoxylin and eosin staining, micrometastasis, and negative were found in 46 (11%), 32 (8%), and 322 (81%) patients, respectively. The median overall survival times of patients with PALN positivity, including micrometastasis, was 22.5 months. Multivariate logistic regression identified borderline or locally advanced status (p=0.037), elevated preoperative carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9 level (p<0.001), larger tumor size ≥30 mm (p=0.001) and larger PALN size ≥10 mm (p=0.019) as independent preoperative risk factors of PALN positivity. Multivariate overall survival analysis demonstrated borderline or locally advanced status (p=0.013), elevated preoperative CA19-9 level (p<0.001) and PALN positivity (p=0.048) were independent poor prognostic factors. CONCLUSIONS Borderline or locally advanced status, elevated preoperative CA19-9 level, and larger tumor and PALN size were risk factors for PALN positivity, and thus, they may contribute to the optimization of preoperative treatments for patients with potential PALN positivity.
Collapse
|
41
|
Luo G, Jin K, Deng S, Cheng H, Fan Z, Gong Y, Qian Y, Huang Q, Ni Q, Liu C, Yu X. Roles of CA19-9 in pancreatic cancer: Biomarker, predictor and promoter. Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer 2021; 1875:188409. [PMID: 32827580 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2020.188409] [Citation(s) in RCA: 118] [Impact Index Per Article: 39.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2020] [Revised: 06/29/2020] [Accepted: 07/20/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) is the best validated biomarker and an indicator of aberrant glycosylation in pancreatic cancer. CA19-9 functions as a biomarker, predictor, and promoter in pancreatic cancer. As a biomarker, the sensitivity is approximately 80%, and the major challenges involve false positives in conditions of inflammation and nonpancreatic cancers and false negatives in Lewis-negative Individuals. Lewis antigen status should be determined when using CA19-9 as a biomarker. CA19-9 has screening potential when combined with symptoms and/or risk factors. As a predictor, CA19-9 could be used to assess stage, prognosis, resectability, recurrence, and therapeutic efficacy. Normal baseline levels of CA19-9 are associated with long-term survival. As a promoter, CA19-9 could be used to evaluate the biology of pancreatic cancer. CA19-9 can accelerate pancreatic cancer progression by glycosylating proteins, binding to E-selectin, strengthening angiogenesis, and mediating the immunological response. CA19-9 is an attractive therapeutic target for cancer, and strategies include therapeutic antibodies and vaccines, CA19-9-guided nanoparticles, and inhibition of CA19-9 biosynthesis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guopei Luo
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, China; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, China; Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Fudan University, Shanghai Pancreatic Cancer Institute, China
| | - Kaizhou Jin
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, China; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, China; Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Fudan University, Shanghai Pancreatic Cancer Institute, China
| | - Shengming Deng
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, China; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, China; Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Fudan University, Shanghai Pancreatic Cancer Institute, China
| | - He Cheng
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, China; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, China; Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Fudan University, Shanghai Pancreatic Cancer Institute, China
| | - Zhiyao Fan
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, China; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, China; Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Fudan University, Shanghai Pancreatic Cancer Institute, China
| | - Yitao Gong
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, China; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, China; Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Fudan University, Shanghai Pancreatic Cancer Institute, China
| | - Yunzhen Qian
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, China; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, China; Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Fudan University, Shanghai Pancreatic Cancer Institute, China
| | - Qiuyi Huang
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, China; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, China; Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Fudan University, Shanghai Pancreatic Cancer Institute, China
| | - Quanxing Ni
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, China; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, China; Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Fudan University, Shanghai Pancreatic Cancer Institute, China
| | - Chen Liu
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, China; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, China; Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Fudan University, Shanghai Pancreatic Cancer Institute, China.
| | - Xianjun Yu
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, China; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, China; Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Fudan University, Shanghai Pancreatic Cancer Institute, China.
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Perri G, Prakash L, Wang H, Bhosale P, Varadhachary GR, Wolff R, Fogelman D, Overman M, Pant S, Javle M, Koay E, Herman J, Kim M, Ikoma N, Tzeng CW, Lee JE, Katz MHG. Radiographic and Serologic Predictors of Pathologic Major Response to Preoperative Therapy for Pancreatic Cancer. Ann Surg 2021; 273:806-813. [PMID: 31274655 PMCID: PMC7703852 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000003442] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We sought to identify potential radiologic and serologic markers of pancreatic tumor response to therapy, using pathologic major response (pMR) as the objective endpoint. BACKGROUND We previously demonstrated that a pMR to preoperative therapy, defined as detection of <5% viable cancer cells in the surgical specimen on histopathological analysis, is an important prognostic factor for patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). METHODS Pretreatment and posttreatment computed tomography scans of consecutive patients who received preoperative chemotherapy and/or (chemo)radiation before pancreatectomy for PDAC between January 2010 and December 2018 were rereviewed. Response per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1, other radiographic changes in tumor size and anatomic extent, and posttreatment CA 19-9 levels were compared between patients who did and did not have a pMR on final histopathologic analysis of their surgical specimens. RESULTS A total of 290 patients with localized PDAC underwent pancreatectomy between 2010 and 2018 after receiving preoperative chemotherapy (n = 36; 12%), (chemo)radiation (n = 87; 30%), or both (n = 167; 58%). Among them, 28 (10%) experienced pMR, including 9 (3.1%) who experienced pathologic complete response. On multivariable logistic regression, low posttreatment CA 19-9 level, RECIST partial response, and reduction in tumor volume were confirmed to be independently associated with pMR (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS We identified serologic and radiographic indicators of pMR that could help inform the delivery of preoperative therapy to patients with PDAC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giampaolo Perri
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Laura Prakash
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Huamin Wang
- Department of Anatomic Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Priya Bhosale
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Gauri R Varadhachary
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Robert Wolff
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - David Fogelman
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Michael Overman
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Shubham Pant
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Milind Javle
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Eugene Koay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Joseph Herman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Michael Kim
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Naruhiko Ikoma
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Ching-Wei Tzeng
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Jeffrey E Lee
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Matthew H G Katz
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Lindemann J, du Toit L, Kotze U, Bernon M, Krige J, Jonas E. Survival equivalence in patients treated for borderline resectable and unresectable locally advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. HPB (Oxford) 2021; 23:173-186. [PMID: 33268268 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2020.09.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2020] [Revised: 08/04/2020] [Accepted: 09/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The clinical relevance of subdivision of non-metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) into locally advanced borderline resectable (LA-BR) and locally advanced unresectable (LA-UR) has been questioned. We assessed equivalence of overall survival (OS) in patients with LA-BR and LA-UR PDAC. METHODS A systematic review was performed of studies published January 1, 2009 to August 21, 2019, reporting OS for LA-BR and LA-UR patients treated with or without neoadjuvant therapy (NAT), with or without surgical resection. A frequentist network meta-analysis was used to assess the primary outcome (hazard ratio for OS) and secondary outcomes (OS in LA-BR, LA-UR, and upfront resectable (UFR) PDAC). RESULTS Thirty-nine studies, comprising 14,065 patients in a network of eight unique treatment subgroups were analysed. Overall survival was better for LA-BR than LA-UR patients following surgery both with and without NAT. Neoadjuvant therapy prior to surgery was associated with longer OS for UFR, LA-BR, and LA-UR tumours, compared to upfront surgery. CONCLUSION Survival between the LA-BR and LA-UR subgroups was not equivalent. This subdivision is useful for prognostication, but likely unhelpful in treatment decision making. Our data supports NAT regardless of initial disease extent. Individual patient data assessment is needed to accurately estimate the benefit of NAT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica Lindemann
- Surgical Gastroenterology Unit, Division of General Surgery, University of Cape Town Health Sciences Faculty and Groote Schuur Hospital, Anzio Road, Observatory, 7925, Cape Town, South Africa; Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 South Euclid Ave, Saint Louis, MO, 63110, USA
| | - Leon du Toit
- Department of Anaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, University of Cape Town Health Sciences Faculty and Groote Schuur Hospital, Anzio Road, Observatory, 7925, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Urda Kotze
- Surgical Gastroenterology Unit, Division of General Surgery, University of Cape Town Health Sciences Faculty and Groote Schuur Hospital, Anzio Road, Observatory, 7925, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Marc Bernon
- Surgical Gastroenterology Unit, Division of General Surgery, University of Cape Town Health Sciences Faculty and Groote Schuur Hospital, Anzio Road, Observatory, 7925, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Jake Krige
- Surgical Gastroenterology Unit, Division of General Surgery, University of Cape Town Health Sciences Faculty and Groote Schuur Hospital, Anzio Road, Observatory, 7925, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Eduard Jonas
- Surgical Gastroenterology Unit, Division of General Surgery, University of Cape Town Health Sciences Faculty and Groote Schuur Hospital, Anzio Road, Observatory, 7925, Cape Town, South Africa.
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
White MG, Tzeng CWD. ASO Author Reflections: Potential Role of Circulating Biomarkers in Resected Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2021; 28:4623-4624. [PMID: 33507452 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-09611-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2021] [Accepted: 01/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Michael G White
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ching-Wei D Tzeng
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Combining CRP and CA19-9 in a novel prognostic score in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Sci Rep 2021; 11:781. [PMID: 33437015 PMCID: PMC7804300 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-80778-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2020] [Accepted: 12/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Inflammation promotes tumor progression, induces invasion and metastatic spread. This retrospective study explored CRP, CA19-9, and routine laboratory values as preoperative prognostic factors in pancreatic cancer patients. Between 2000 and 2016, there were 212 surgically treated pancreatic cancer patients at Helsinki University Hospital, Finland. Out of these, 76 borderline resectable patients were treated with neoadjuvant therapy (NAT); 136 upfront resected patients were matched for age and sex at a 1:2 ratio. We analyzed preoperative CRP, CA19-9, CEA, leukocytes, albumin, bilirubin and platelets. CRP and CA19-9 were combined into a prognostic score: both CRP and CA19-9 below the cut-off values (3 mg/l and 37 kU/l, respectively), either CRP or CA19-9 above the cut-off value, and finally, both CRP and CA19-9 above the cut-off values. Among all patients, median disease-specific survival times were 54, 27 and 16 months, respectively (p < 0.001). At 5 years, among patients with CRP and CA19-9 levels below the cut-off values, 49% were alive and 45% were disease-free. Among NAT patients the corresponding survival rates were 52% and 45% and among those undergoing upfront surgery 45% and 40%, respectively. This novel prognostic score combining CRP and CA19-9 serves as a useful preoperative tool estimating survival.
Collapse
|
46
|
White MG, Lee A, Vicente D, Hall C, Kim MP, Katz MHG, Lee JE, Ikoma N, Lucci A, Tzeng CWD. Measurement of Portal Vein Blood Circulating Tumor Cells is Safe and May Correlate With Outcomes in Resected Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2021; 28:4615-4622. [PMID: 33415562 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-020-09518-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2020] [Accepted: 12/05/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study investigated the safety and feasibility of intraoperative portal vein blood (PVB) collection at the time of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) resection. Relationships of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in PVB and peripheral blood (PB) with overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival were studied. METHODS Patients undergoing PDAC resection were offered enrollment in a prospective liquid biopsy protocol. The patients had PB drawn before incision and PVB drawn before tumor mobilization, then again immediately after resection. Using standard CellSearch protocols, CTCs were identified and compared with OS. RESULTS Of the 34 patients enrolled in this study, 23 (68%) underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy, 8 (23%) underwent distal pancreatectomy, and 3 (9%) underwent total pancreatectomy. Peripheral blood was available for 22 (65%) and PVB for 31 (91%) of the patients. No bleeding or thrombotic complications occurred with the PVB draws. The CTC counts per 7.5 mL of PVB collected before and after resection were highly correlated (R2 = 0.89). The study found CTCs in 11 (50%) of 22 PB samples and 22 (71%) of 31 PVB samples. The OS rate at 18 months was 92% for the patients with < 3 CTCs, 71% for the patients with ≥ 3 CTCs per 7.5 mL of PB (p = 0.30), 100% for the patients without PVB CTCs, and 70% for the patients with PVB CTCs (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS Collection of PVB during PDAC resection is safe. In this pilot study, PVB CTC counts but not PB CTC counts were significantly correlated with OS. This opens the door for future studies on selective omission of adjuvant chemotherapy for patients treated preoperatively and tailored surveillance intensity for patients without PVB CTCs at PDAC resection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael G White
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Andrew Lee
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.,Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Diego Vicente
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.,Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences and the Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Carolyn Hall
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Michael P Kim
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Matthew H G Katz
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jeffrey E Lee
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Naruhiko Ikoma
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Anthony Lucci
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ching-Wei D Tzeng
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Sonohara F, Yamada S, Kurimoto K, Inokawa Y, Takami H, Hayashi M, Shimizu D, Hattori N, Kanda M, Tanaka C, Nakayama G, Koike M, Fujii T, Kodera Y. Age-Related Differences in the Prognosis of Pancreatic Cancer According to Perioperative Systemic Therapy. Pancreas 2021; 50:37-46. [PMID: 33370021 DOI: 10.1097/mpa.0000000000001712] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/10/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES In this study, we retrospectively assessed the feasibility and prognostic efficacy of perioperative chemo(radio)therapy for pancreatic cancer (PC) patients according to age. METHODS A total of 556 consecutive patients who underwent curative-intent pancreatectomy for PC between 2000 and 2018 were enrolled. RESULTS Of the 556 patients who underwent resection, 95 (17%) were elderly (age, ≥75 years). Postoperative complications did not significantly differ between the 2 age groups, and postoperative prognoses were also similar (recurrence-free survival [RFS], P = 0.68; overall survival [OS], P = 0.28). In this cohort, 103 patients (19%) underwent preoperative chemo(radio)therapy, and 417 (77%) underwent postoperative chemotherapy. Perioperative therapy was found to be significantly beneficial for younger patients (preoperative therapy: RFS, P = 0.006; OS, P < 0.001; postoperative therapy: RFS, P < 0.001; OS, P < 0.001). Conversely, no significant survival benefit of perioperative therapy was found for the elderly (preoperative therapy: RFS, P = 0.28; OS, P = 0.44; postoperative therapy: RFS, P = 0.77; OS, P = 0.08). CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrated that, although perioperative therapy is feasible for selected elderly patients with PC, this approach might not be as beneficial as it is for younger PC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fuminori Sonohara
- From the Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya University, Nagoya
| | - Suguru Yamada
- From the Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya University, Nagoya
| | - Keisuke Kurimoto
- From the Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya University, Nagoya
| | - Yoshikuni Inokawa
- From the Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya University, Nagoya
| | - Hideki Takami
- From the Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya University, Nagoya
| | - Masamichi Hayashi
- From the Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya University, Nagoya
| | - Dai Shimizu
- From the Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya University, Nagoya
| | - Norifumi Hattori
- From the Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya University, Nagoya
| | - Mitsuro Kanda
- From the Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya University, Nagoya
| | - Chie Tanaka
- From the Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya University, Nagoya
| | - Goro Nakayama
- From the Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya University, Nagoya
| | - Masahiko Koike
- From the Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya University, Nagoya
| | - Tsutomu Fujii
- Department of Surgery and Science, Faculty of Medicine, Academic Assembly, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan
| | - Yasuhiro Kodera
- From the Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya University, Nagoya
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Yu Y, Zheng P, Chen Y, Wang B, Paul ME, Tao P, Wang D, Li H, Gu B, Gao L, Wang D, Chen H. Advances and challenges of neoadjuvant therapy in pancreatic cancer. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol 2020; 17:425-434. [PMID: 33164329 DOI: 10.1111/ajco.13504] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2020] [Accepted: 07/10/2020] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
Pancreatic cancer has been becoming the second cause of cancer death in the western world, and its disease burden has increased. Neoadjuvant therapy is one of the current research hotspots in the field of pancreatic cancer, aiming to improve the surgical rate and prognosis of pancreatic cancer. Based on the latest evidence, this review discussed neoadjuvant therapy in pancreatic cancer from the following three aspects: patient selection, protocols selection of neoadjuvant therapy, and treatment response evaluation and resectability prediction. A big controversy existed on the indications of neoadjuvant treatment, but it was agreed that any patient who is likely to achieve R0 resection due to neoadjuvant therapy should be the targeted population. A variety of chemotherapy regimens were tried for neoadjuvant therapy in pancreatic cancer, and FOLFIRINOX and Nab-Paclitaxel plus Gemcitabine are two preferred regimens at present. It was challenging to evaluate treatment response and predict resectability after neoadjuvant therapy, although imaging by CT is widely used. Based on new findings of the remarkable performance of several chemotherapy regimens with or without radiotherapy, the neoadjuvant indications of pancreatic cancer have extended in recent years. However, it is still a challenge to assess the neoadjuvant treatment response and determine the timing of surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yang Yu
- The Department of Tumor Surgery, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, P. R. China.,The Second Clinical Medical College of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, P. R. China
| | - Peng Zheng
- The Department of Tumor Surgery, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, P. R. China.,The Second Clinical Medical College of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, P. R. China
| | - Yajing Chen
- The Department of Tumor Surgery, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, P. R. China.,The Second Clinical Medical College of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, P. R. China
| | - Bofang Wang
- The Department of Tumor Surgery, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, P. R. China.,The Second Clinical Medical College of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, P. R. China
| | - Maswikiti Ewetse Paul
- The Department of Tumor Surgery, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, P. R. China.,The Second Clinical Medical College of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, P. R. China
| | - Pengxian Tao
- The Department of Tumor Surgery, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, P. R. China.,The Second Clinical Medical College of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, P. R. China
| | - Dengfeng Wang
- The Department of Tumor Surgery, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, P. R. China.,The Second Clinical Medical College of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, P. R. China
| | - Haiyuan Li
- The Department of Tumor Surgery, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, P. R. China.,The Second Clinical Medical College of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, P. R. China
| | - Baohong Gu
- The Department of Tumor Surgery, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, P. R. China.,The Second Clinical Medical College of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, P. R. China
| | - Lei Gao
- The Department of Tumor Surgery, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, P. R. China.,The Second Clinical Medical College of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, P. R. China
| | - Dan Wang
- The Department of Tumor Surgery, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, P. R. China.,The Second Clinical Medical College of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, P. R. China
| | - Hao Chen
- The Department of Tumor Surgery, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, P. R. China.,The Key Laboratory of the Digestive System Tumors of Gansu Province, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, P. R. China
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Yu S, Zhang C, Xie KP. Therapeutic resistance of pancreatic cancer: Roadmap to its reversal. Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer 2020; 1875:188461. [PMID: 33157162 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2020.188461] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2020] [Revised: 10/20/2020] [Accepted: 10/24/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Pancreatic cancer is a lethal disease with limited opportunity for resectable surgery as the first choice for cure due to its late diagnosis and early metastasis. The desmoplastic stroma and cellular genetic or epigenetic alterations of pancreatic cancer impose physical and biological barriers to effective therapies, including chemotherapy, radiotherapy, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy. Here, we review the current therapeutic options for pancreatic cancer, and underlying mechanisms and potential reversal of therapeutic resistance, a hallmark of this deadly disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sen Yu
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Guangzhou First People's Hospital Affiliated to the South China University of Technology, School of Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People's Republic of China
| | - Chunyu Zhang
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Guangzhou First People's Hospital Affiliated to the South China University of Technology, School of Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People's Republic of China
| | - Ke-Ping Xie
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Guangzhou First People's Hospital Affiliated to the South China University of Technology, School of Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Borderline Resectable and Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: FDG PET/MRI and CT Tumor Metrics for Assessment of Pathologic Response to Neoadjuvant Therapy and Prediction of Survival. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2020; 217:730-740. [PMID: 33084382 DOI: 10.2214/ajr.20.24567] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND. Imaging biomarkers of response to neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA) are needed to optimize treatment decisions and long-term outcomes. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to investigate metrics from PET/MRI and CT to assess pathologic response of PDA to NAT and to predict overall survival (OS). METHODS. This retrospective study included 44 patients with 18F-FDG-avid borderline resectable or locally advanced PDA on pretreatment PET/MRI who also underwent post-NAT PET/MRI before surgery between August 2016 and February 2019. Carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9) level, metabolic metrics from PET/MRI, and morphologic metrics from CT (n = 34) were compared between pathologic responders (College of American Pathologists scores 0 and 1) and nonresponders (scores 2 and 3). AUCs were measured for metrics significantly associated with pathologic response. Relation to OS was evaluated with Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS. Among 44 patients (22 men, 22 women; mean age, 62 ± 11.6 years), 19 (43%) were responders, and 25 (57%) were nonresponders. Median OS was 24 months (range, 6-42 months). Before treatment, responders and nonresponders did not differ in CA 19-9 level, metabolic metrics, or CT metrics (p > .05). After treatment, responders and nonresponders differed in complete metabolic response (CMR) (responders, 89% [17/19]; nonresponders, 40% [10/25]; p = .04], mean change in SUVmax (ΔSUVmax; responders, -70% ± 13%; nonresponders, -37% ± 42%; p < .001), mean change in SUVmax corrected to serum glucose level (ΔSUVgluc) (responders, -74% ± 12%; nonresponders, -30% ± 58%; p < .001), RECIST response on CT (responders, 93% [13/14]; nonresponders, 50% [10/20]; p = .02)], and mean change in tumor volume on CT (ΔTvol) (responders, -85% ± 21%; nonresponders, 57% ± 400%; p < .001). The AUC of CMR for pathologic response was 0.75; ΔSUVmax, 0.83; ΔSUVgluc, 0.87; RECIST, 0.71; and ΔTvol 0.86. The AUCs of bivariable PET/MRI and CT models were 0.83 (CMR and ΔSUVmax), 0.87 (CMR and ΔSUVgluc), and 0.87 (RECIST and ΔTvol). OS was associated with CMR (p = .03), ΔSUVmax (p = .003), ΔSUVgluc (p = .003), and RECIST (p = .046). CONCLUSION. Unlike CA 19-9 level, changes in metabolic metrics from PET/MRI and morphologic metrics from CT after NAT were associated with pathologic response and OS in patients with PDA, warranting prospective validation. CLINICAL IMPACT. Imaging metrics associated with pathologic response and OS in PDA could help guide clinical management and outcomes for patients with PDA who undergo emergency therapeutic interventions.
Collapse
|