Autotransplantation of culture-positive islet product: is dirty always bad?

Pharmacological management of patients undergoing total pancreatectomy with auto-islet transplantation

Chronic pancreatitis results in permanent parenchymal destruction of the pancreas gland leading to anatomical and physiological consequences for patients. Surgical management varies, and some patients require total pancreatectomy with autologous islet cell transplantation (TPIAT). Patients undergoing TPIAT require complex and diligent management after surgery. This encompasses the management of glucose control (endocrine function of the pancreas) and supplementing loss of exocrine function of the pancreas with digestive enzymes. Other areas of management include optimizing pain relief while reducing narcotic usage, providing antimicrobial prophylaxis, and reducing loss of islet cells by improving its integrity through anticoagulation and use of anti-inflammatory agents. Each aspect of care is unique to this population. However, comprehensive reviews on its pharmacological management are scarce. This review will discuss the available literature to date surrounding all aspects of pharmacological management of patients undergoing TPIAT.

Total pancreatectomy with intraportal islet autotransplantation for pancreatic malignancies: a literature overview

INTRODUCTION

'Brittle Diabetes' (BD) is a life-threatening metabolic complication after total pancreatectomy (TP). More than 500 Intraportal islet autotransplantation (IAT) have been performed to prevent this complication, with almost 70% insulin independence after 3 years. Even when insulin independence was not achieved, IAT successfully prevented severe hypoglycemia. Currently, preliminary results for oncologic situations are promising, but their oncological outcomes are still a matter of debate.

AREAS COVERED

We performed a bibliographic research of the last 25 years of data. Articles published in English in peer-reviewed journals were retained. In France, auto- and allo-islet transplantation was recently recognized as a valuable treatment for BD by the national health authority. While accepted for benign diseases, the risk of tumor spreading after IAT in oncologic situations is a source of concern.

EXPERT OPINION

Preliminary results of IAT in oncological situations are very encouraging. So far, there is no evidence of tumor dissemination. In our opinion, to overcome BD TP with IAT for resectable pancreatic malignancies in patients with a higher risk of postoperative pancreatic fistula and extended pancreatic cancers can be safely performed. Diagnosis of malignancy should not be considered as an exclusion criterion for IAT.

Clinical Significance of Postoperative Antibiotic Treatment for Positive Islet Cultures After Total Pancreatectomy With Islet Autotransplantation

OBJECTIVES

Islet cultures are routinely performed in total pancreatectomy with islet autotransplantation (TPIAT), and the need for empiric antibiotic treatment based on culture results is unknown. We evaluated the effect of postoperative antibiotic treatment for positive islet cultures on clinical infection.

METHODS

Seventy-nine patients undergoing TPIAT were reviewed. Prophylactic perioperative ceftriaxone and metronidazole were administered, and transplanted islet preparations included ciprofloxacin. Postoperative antibiotics were not routinely given for positive cultures unless a clinical infection was suspected. The primary end point was 30-day infectious complications.

RESULTS

Fifty-one patients (65%) had a positive culture. Overall, 39 patients (87%) had organisms susceptible to our perioperative antibiotic regimen. There was no difference in the infectious complication rate between those with positive compared with negative cultures (16% vs 29%, P = 0.17). Patients with a positive culture had similar 30-day postoperative infectious complication rates whether receiving postoperative antibiotics (n = 7) or not (14% vs 16%, P = 0.91). Only 1 patient had a correlation of clinical and islet cultures.

CONCLUSIONS

Beyond prophylactic antibiotics, empiric antibiotic treatment for a positive culture is not warranted and provides a rationale for the abandonment of routine cultures in TPIAT.

Total Pancreatectomy with Autologous Islet Cell Transplantation-The Current Indications

Total pancreatectomy is a major complex surgical procedure involving removal of the whole pancreatic parenchyma and duodenum. It leads to lifelong pancreatic exocrine and endocrine insufficiency. The control of surgery-induced diabetes (type 3) requires insulin therapy. Total pancreatectomy with autologous islet transplantation (TPAIT) is performed in order to prevent postoperative diabetes and its serious complications. It is very important whether it is safe and beneficial for patients in terms of postoperative morbidity and mortality, and long-term results including quality of life. Small duct painful chronic pancreatitis (CP) is a primary indication for TPAIT, but currently the indications for this procedure have been extended. They also include hereditary/genetic pancreatitis (HGP), as well as less frequent indications such as benign/borderline pancreatic tumors (intraductal papillary neoplasms, neuroendocrine neoplasms) and “high-risk pancreatic stump”. The use of TPAIT in malignant pancreatic and peripancreatic neoplasms has been reported in the worldwide literature but currently is not a standard but rather a controversial management in these patients. In this review, history, technique, indications, and contraindications, as well as short-term and long-term results of TPAIT, including pediatric patients, are described.

Preoperative ERCP has no impact on islet yield following total pancreatectomy and islet autotransplantation (TPIAT): Results from the Prospective Observational Study of TPIAT (POST) cohort

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Many patients undergoing total pancreatectomy with islet autotransplant (TPIAT) for severe, refractory chronic pancreatitis or recurrent acute pancreatitis have a history of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Using data from the multicenter POST (Prospective Observational Study of TPIAT) cohort, we aimed to determine clinical characteristics associated with ERCP and the effect of ERCP on islet yield.

METHODS

Using data from 230 participants (11 centers), demographics, pancreatitis history, and imaging features were tested for association with ERCP procedures. Logistic and linear regression were used to assess association of islet yield measures with having any pre-operative ERCPs and with the number of ERCPs, adjusting for confounders.

RESULTS

175 (76%) underwent ERCPs [median number of ERCPs (IQR) 2 (1-4). ERCP was more common in those with obstructed pancreatic duct (p = 0.0009), pancreas divisum (p = 0.0009), prior pancreatic surgery (p = 0.005), and longer disease duration (p = 0.004). A greater number of ERCPs was associated with disease duration (p < 0.0001), obstructed pancreatic duct (p = 0.006), and prior pancreatic surgery (p = 0.006) and increased risk for positive islet culture (p < 0.0001). Mean total IEQ/kg with vs. without prior ERCP were 4145 (95% CI 3621-4669) vs. 3476 (95% CI 2521-4431) respectively (p = 0.23). Adjusting for confounders, islet yield was not significantly associated with prior ERCP, number of ERCPs, biliary or pancreatic sphincterotomy or stent placement.

CONCLUSIONS

ERCP did not appear to adversely impact islet yield. When indicated, ERCP need not be withheld to optimize islet yield but the risk-benefit ratio of ERCP should be considered given its potential harms, including risk for excessive delay in TPIAT.

Sterility Cultures Following Pancreatectomy with Islet Autotransplantation in the Pediatric Population: Do They Matter?

BACKGROUND

Pancreatectomy with islet autotransplantation (IAT) is a treatment option for children with debilitating chronic pancreatitis. Sterility cultures from preservation solutions are often positive, yet their impact has not been well studied in children.

METHODS

A retrospective review of all patients who underwent IAT from 2015 to 2018 at a single institution was performed. Sterility culture data were obtained from both the pancreas transport and islet transplant media. All patients received prophylactic perioperative meropenem and vancomycin for 72 h per our protocol. If cultures resulted positive, antibiotics were extended for a total of 7 days. Primary outcomes were postoperative fever and 30-day infectious complications.

RESULTS

Forty-one patients underwent IAT during the study period. Seventeen (41.5 %) patients had negative cultures of both the transport and transplant media, while 24 (58.5 %) patients had a positive culture from either sample. Of these patients, 13 (31.7 %) were positive in both, 10 (24.4 %) were positive in only the transport media, and 1 (2.4 %) was positive in only the transplant media. Patients with positive transplant media were similar with regard to age, gender, etiology, and disease duration compared to those with negative transplant media (all p > 0.05), but the positive group was more likely to have a pancreatic stent in place at the time of surgery (38.5 % vs. 4.2 %, p = 0.01). The overall postoperative infectious complication rate was 31.2 % (n = 13). No difference was detected between the transplant positive and negative culture groups in postoperative fever or 30-day infectious complications (p > 0.05 for each).

CONCLUSION

An existing pancreatic stent at the time of pancreatectomy with IAT is a risk factor for positive sterility cultures. However, positive islet transplant media culture was not associated with increased risk of post-IAT infection or morbidity in the setting of an empiric antibiotic protocol. Future work is necessary to study the optimal perioperative antibiotic regimen in pediatric IAT.

Impact of microbial contamination of the islet product during total pancreatectomy with islet autotransplantation

BACKGROUND

The combined use of interleukin-1β and tumor necrosis factor-α blockers in the peritransplant period has improved outcomes of total pancreatectomy with islet autotransplantation (TPIAT). However, these drugs may suppress the immune system, resulting in severe infection.

METHODS

We retrospectively investigated the impact of microbial-contaminated islet product on posttransplant complications and metabolic outcomes of TPIAT patients receiving the IL-1β and TNF-blockade treatment at our center.

RESULTS

Among 108 TPIAT patients, 37 patients (34%) received contaminated products. Preoperative stent treatment and fibrosis score were independent risk factors for the contamination. There were no significant differences between the contaminated and noncontaminated product groups in posttransplant infectious complication rate, length of hospitalization, or readmission rate. However, islet equivalents (P < .0001) and insulin independence rate (P = .036) at 6 months were significantly lower for patients receiving contaminated product.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that combined anti-inflammatory drug use is safe and well tolerated in TPIAT patients who receive contaminated islet product and does not increase the rate of infectious complications; however, contaminated islet product is associated with poor metabolic outcomes.

Early Infectious Complications After Total Pancreatectomy with Islet Autotransplantation: a Single Center Experience

INTRODUCTION

We assessed whether positive microbiological cultures from the islet preparation had any effect on the risk of infectious complications (IC) after total pancreatectomy with islet autotransplantation (TPIAT) in our center.

METHODS

We analyzed preservation fluid and final islet product surveillance cultures with reference to clinical data of patients undergoing TPIAT. All patients received routine prophylactic broad-spectrum antibiotics.

RESULTS

The study involved 10 men and 18 women with a median age of 39 years. Over 30% of surveillance cultures during pancreas processing grew bacterial strains with predominantly polymicrobial contaminations (13 of 22 (59%)). At least one positive culture was identified in almost half of the patients (46%) undergoing TPIAT and a third had both surveillance cultures positive. Infectious complications affected 50% of patients. After excluding cases of PICC line-associated bacteremia/fungemia present on admission, incidence of IC was higher in cases of positive final islet product culture than in those with negative result (57% vs. 21%), which also corresponded with the duration of chronic pancreatitis (p = 0.04). Surgical site infections were the most common IC, followed by fever of unknown origin. There was no concordance between pathogens isolated from the pancreas and those identified during the infection.

CONCLUSIONS

While IC was common among TPIAT patients, we found no concordance between pathogens isolated from the pancreas and those identified during infection. Contamination of the final islet product was of clinical importance and could represent a surrogate marker for higher susceptibility to infection.

Microbial Contamination, Infection, and Antimicrobial Use During Total Pancreatectomy With Islet Autotransplantation

OBJECTIVES

Total pancreatectomy with islet autotransplantation can relieve pain associated with chronic pancreatitis while preserving islet function. Islet preparations are often contaminated by enteric flora. We assessed the impact of contaminated islet preparations on the prevalence of postoperative infection.

METHODS

Electronic health records for patients who underwent total pancreatectomy with islet autotransplantation from August 1, 2011, to November 15, 2017 were retrospectively reviewed to compare the prevalence of postoperative infection in patients with a positive islet culture and islet culture negative patients.

RESULTS

Sixty-one patients were included. Twenty-nine patients (47.5%) had a positive islet culture, and 23 (79.3%) of these patients received antimicrobial prophylaxis. The prevalence of postoperative infection did not differ between the islet culture positive and islet culture negative groups (41% vs 34%, P = 0.57). No infections occurred in the 6 islet culture positive patients who did not receive prophylaxis. No difference in intensive care unit or hospital length of stay or in 30-day or 90-day readmission rates were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the common use of postoperative systemic antimicrobials, we observed no difference in the prevalence of postoperative infection, length of stay, or hospital readmission in patients receiving a contaminated islet preparation. If prophylactic antimicrobials are used, the duration should be minimized.

Pancreatic Islet Transplantation in Humans: Recent Progress and Future Directions

Pancreatic islet transplantation has become an established approach to β-cell replacement therapy for the treatment of insulin-deficient diabetes. Recent progress in techniques for islet isolation, islet culture, and peritransplant management of the islet transplant recipient has resulted in substantial improvements in metabolic and safety outcomes for patients. For patients requiring total or subtotal pancreatectomy for benign disease of the pancreas, isolation of islets from the diseased pancreas with intrahepatic transplantation of autologous islets can prevent or ameliorate postsurgical diabetes, and for patients previously experiencing painful recurrent acute or chronic pancreatitis, quality of life is substantially improved. For patients with type 1 diabetes or insulin-deficient forms of pancreatogenic (type 3c) diabetes, isolation of islets from a deceased donor pancreas with intrahepatic transplantation of allogeneic islets can ameliorate problematic hypoglycemia, stabilize glycemic lability, and maintain on-target glycemic control, consequently with improved quality of life, and often without the requirement for insulin therapy. Because the metabolic benefits are dependent on the numbers of islets transplanted that survive engraftment, recipients of autoislets are limited to receive the number of islets isolated from their own pancreas, whereas recipients of alloislets may receive islets isolated from more than one donor pancreas. The development of alternative sources of islet cells for transplantation, whether from autologous, allogeneic, or xenogeneic tissues, is an active area of investigation that promises to expand access and indications for islet transplantation in the future treatment of diabetes.

Patient and Procedural Factors Associated With Increased Islet Cell Yield in Total Pancreatectomy With Islet Autotransplantation

OBJECTIVES

Total pancreatectomy with islet autotransplantation (TPIAT) offers symptom relief to highly selected patients with recurrent acute and/or chronic pancreatitis. However, with variable clinical response, it is important to refine islet manipulation technique and patient selection criteria. This study explores the variables associated with high islet cell yield, a driver of success in TPIAT.

METHODS

This study evaluated patients who underwent TPIAT at Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center from 2012 to 2016. Odds ratios were calculated for various patient and procedural characteristics. The primary clinical outcome was the number of isolated islet equivalents per kilogram body weight.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight patients met inclusion criteria. Patients with no computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging evidence of chronic pancreatitis, without pancreatic duct stones, and without parenchymal stones were associated with higher odds of success (P = 0.02, P = 0.02, and P = 0.002, respectively). Patients with preoperative glycated hemoglobin greater than 5.6, with islet cell suspensions positive for cultures, and with positive gram stains were associated with lower odds of success (P = 0.02, P = 0.01, and P = 0.02, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Factors that diminish a successful islet cell harvest during TPIAT include the presence of infected islets, an elevated preoperative glycated hemoglobin, and the presence of pancreatic duct stones.

Salvage Islet Auto Transplantation After Relaparatomy

BACKGROUND

To assess feasibility, safety, and metabolic outcome of islet auto transplantation (IAT) in patients undergoing completion pancreatectomy because of sepsis or bleeding after pancreatic surgery.

METHODS

From November 2008 to October 2016, approximately 22 patients were candidates to salvage IAT during emergency relaparotomy because of postpancreatectomy sepsis (n = 11) or bleeding (n = 11). Feasibility, efficacy, and safety of salvage IAT were compared with those documented in a cohort of 36 patients who were candidate to simultaneous IAT during nonemergency preemptive completion pancreatectomy through the pancreaticoduodenectomy.

RESULTS

The percentage of candidates that received the infusion of islets was significantly lower in salvage IAT than simultaneous IAT (59.1% vs 88.9%, P = 0.008), mainly because of a higher rate of inadequate islet preparations. Even if microbial contamination of islet preparation was significantly higher in candidates to salvage IAT than in those to simultaneous IAT (78.9% vs 20%, P < 0.001), there was no evidence of a higher rate of complications related to the procedure. Median follow-up was 5.45 ± 0.52 years. Four (36%) of 11 patients reached insulin independence, 6 patients (56%) had partial graft function, and 1 patient (9%) had primary graft nonfunction. At the last follow-up visit, median fasting C-peptide was 0.43 (0.19-0.93) ng/mL; median insulin requirement was 0.38 (0.04-0.5) U/kg per day, and median HbA1c was 6.6% (5.9%-8.1%). Overall mortality, in-hospital mortality, metabolic outcome, graft survival, and insulin-free survival after salvage IAT were not different from those documented after simultaneous IAT.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data demonstrate the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of salvage IAT after relaparotomy.

Total Pancreatectomy With Islet Autotransplantation for Acute Recurrent and Chronic Pancreatitis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The first total pancreatectomy and islet autotransplantation (TP-IAT) was performed for chronic pancreatitis in 1977 with the goal to ameliorate the pain and simultaneously preserve islet function. We reviewed the recent medical literature regarding indications, patient suitability, current outcomes, and challenges in TP-IAT.

RECENT FINDINGS

Current indications for TP-IAT include intractable pain secondary to chronic pancreatitis (CP) or acute recurrent pancreatitis (ARP) with failed medical and endoscopic/surgical management. Independent studies have shown that TP-IAT is associated with elimination or significant improvement in pain control and partial or full islet graft function in the majority of patients. In single-center cost analyses, TP-IAT has been suggested to be more cost-effective than medical management of chronic pancreatitis. While initially introduced as a surgical option for adults with long-standing chronic pancreatitis, TP-IAT is now often utilized in children with chronic pancreatitis and in children and adults with intractable acute recurrent pancreatitis. The surgical procedure has evolved over time with some centers offering minimally invasive operative options, although the open approach remains the standard. Despite many advances in TP-IAT, there is a need for further research and development in disease diagnosis, patient selection, optimization of surgical technique, islet isolation and quality assessment, postoperative patient management, and establishment of uniform metrics for data collection and multicenter studies. TP-IAT is an option for patients with otherwise intractable acute recurrent or chronic pancreatitis which presents potential for pain relief and improved quality of life, often with partial or complete diabetes remission.

The impact of bacterial colonization on graft success after total pancreatectomy with autologous islet transplantation: considerations for early definitive surgical intervention

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to determine whether bacterial contamination of islets affects graft success after total pancreatectomy with islet autotransplantation (TPIAT).

BACKGROUND

Factors associated with insulin independence after TPIAT are inconclusive. Although bacterial contamination does not preclude transplantation, the impact of bacterial contamination on graft success is unknown.

METHODS

Patients who received TPIAT at the University of Virginia between January 2007 and January 2016 were reviewed. Patient charts were reviewed for bacterial contamination and patients were prospectively contacted to assess rates of insulin independence.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in demographic or perioperative data between patients who achieved insulin independence and those who did not. However, six of 27 patients analyzed (22.2%) grew bacterial contaminants from culture of the final islet preparations. These patients had significantly lower islet yield and C-peptide at most recent follow-up (P<.05), and none of these patients achieved insulin independence.

CONCLUSIONS

Islet transplant solutions are often culture positive, likely secondary to preprocurement pancreatic manipulation and introduction of enteric flora. Although autotransplantation of culture-positive islets is safe, it is associated with higher rates of graft failure and poor islet yield. Consideration should be given to identify patients who may develop refractory chronic pancreatitis and offer early operative management to prevent bacterial colonization.

Microbial contamination of transplant solutions during pancreatic islet autotransplants is not associated with clinical infection in a pediatric population

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

Total pancreatectomy and islet autotransplant (TP-IAT) is a potential treatment for children with severe refractory chronic pancreatitis. Cultures from the resected pancreas and final islet preparation are frequently positive for microbes. It is unknown whether positive cultures are associated with adverse outcomes in pediatric patients.

METHODS

We reviewed the medical records of children (n = 86) who underwent TP-IAT from May 2006-March 2015 with emphasis on demographics, previous pancreatic interventions, culture results, islet yield, hospital days, posttransplant islet function, and posttransplant infections. We compared outcomes in patients with positive (n = 57) and negative (n = 29) cultures.

RESULTS

Patients with positive cultures had higher rates of previous pancreas surgery (P = 0.007) and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (P < 0.0001). Positive cultures were not associated with posttransplant infections (P = 1.00) or prolonged hospital length of stay (P = 0.29). Patients with positive final islet preparation culture showed increased rates of graft failure at 2 years posttransplant (P = 0.041), but not when adjusted for islet mass transplanted (P = 0.39).

CONCLUSIONS

Positive cultures during pediatric TP-IATs do not increase the risk of posttransplant infections or prolong hospital length of stay. Endocrine function depends on islet mass transplanted.

Necessities for a Clinical Islet Program

For more than two decades we have been refining advances in islet cell transplantation as a clinical therapy for patients suffering from type 1 diabetes. A great deal of effort has gone to making this a viable therapy for a broader range of patients with type 1 diabetes. Clinical results have progressively improved, demonstrating clinical outcomes on par with other organ transplants, specifically in terms of insulin independence, graft and patient survival. We are now at the point where islet cell transplantation, in the form of allotransplantation, has become accepted as a clinical therapy in adult patients affected by type 1 diabetes, in particular those suffering from severe hypoglycaemic unawareness. This chapter provides an overview on how this has been undertaken over the years to provide outcomes on par with other organ transplantation results. In particular this chapter focuses on the processes and facilities that are required to establish a clinical islet isolation and transplantation program. It also outlines the very important underpinning processes of selection of the organ donor for islet isolation, the processes of organ donor operation and preservation of the pancreas by various means and the ideal ways to best improve outcomes for human islet cell isolation. Providing these more optimal conditions we can underpin the isolation processes to provide islets for transplantation and as such a safe, effective and feasible therapeutic option for an increasing number of patients suffering from type 1 diabetes with severe hypoglycaemic unawareness.

Pediatric Autologous Islet Transplantation

A total pancreatectomy and islet autotransplant (TPIAT) offers substantial pain relief and improved quality of life for children who are severely affected by chronic or recurrent acute pancreatitis and for whom the usual medical and endoscopic therapies have failed. The pancreas is entirely resected, and the pancreatic islets are isolated from the pancreas and infused back into the patient's liver. Because this is an autologous transplant, no immunosuppression is required. Over several months, the islets engraft in the liver; the patient is then slowly weaned off insulin therapy. Slightly more than 40 % of patients become and remain insulin independent, yet even among patients who remain on insulin, most have some islet function, permitting easier diabetes control. The majority of patients experience pain relief, with significant improvements in health-related quality of life. A TPIAT should be considered for children who are significantly disabled by chronic pancreatitis.