Surgical management of hepatic hemangiomas: a multi-institutional experience

Reconsideration of the clinical management of hepatic hemangioma

In this letter, we comment on the article by Zhou et al that was published in the recent issue of the World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery. This article proposes a new clinical grading system based on a multidisciplinary team, which prompts us to rethink the clinical management of hepatic hemangioma. Hepatic hemangioma is the most common benign solid liver tumor. In general, follow-up and observation for the vast majority of hepatic hemangioma is reasonable. For those patients with symptoms and severe complications, surgical intervention is necessary. Specific surgical indications, however, are still not clear. An effective grading system is helpful in further guiding the clinical management of hepatic hemangioma. In this article, we review the recent literature, summarize the surgical indications and treatment of hepatic hemangioma, and evaluate the potential of this new clinical grading system.

Spontaneous Atraumatic Rupture of a Liver Hemangioma as a Rare Cause of Syncope

Background

Syncope is common in emergency medicine, but only a minority of syncopes is caused by hemorrhage. Liver hemangioma is the most frequent benign liver tumor, and they rarely lead to symptoms or complications. Case Presentation. We describe the case of an 81-year-old man with hemorrhagic shock due to an atraumatic rupture of a hepatic hemangioma while on oral anticoagulation. The patient presented to the emergency department after three episodes of syncope before admission, nausea, vomiting, mild epigastric abdominal pain, but with clinical signs of peritonitis. On admission, the patient had a mild tachycardia with a heart rate of 107/min and a blood pressure of 102/83 mmHg. Initial hemoglobin was 122 g/L, and lactate was slightly elevated (2.5 mmol/L). Bedside sonography revealed free intraabdominal fluid. The subsequent computed tomography showed a ruptured hemangioma of the liver with ongoing hemorrhage. After the CT scan, the patient became increasingly tachycardic and the blood pressure dropped to 94/62 mmHg. After administration of blood products and intravenous fluids, the patient responded with improved hemodynamics and was transferred to angiology for emergency embolization. After the intervention, the patient spent two days in the intermediate care unit and was discharged after 10 days of hospitalization.

Conclusion

Atraumatic rupture of a hemangioma with consecutive hemorrhagic shock is extremely rare. In selected cases of spontaneously ruptured hemangiomas with hemoperitoneum, endovascular embolization can be an alternative to surgery. Furthermore, this case emphasizes the importance of sonographic examination as an additional diagnostic tool in syncope and concomitant abdominal pain.

Surgical management of a 25-cm giant hepatic haemangioma: First case report from Bangladesh with literature review

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE

Giant hepatic haemangioma (GHH) is defined as a hepatic haemangioma (HH) of >10 cm in diameter. Its association with thrombocytopenia and consumption coagulopathy is quite rare.

CASE PRESENTATION

Here, we present a case of a 39-year-old man with a rapidly enlarging 25-cm GHH arising from the entire left hemiliver. Laboratory findings suggested pancytopenia but normal liver and renal functions. He was diagnosed with Kasabach-Merritt syndrome (KMS). After three units of aphaeretic platelet transfusion, the patient underwent left hepatectomy. Postoperative recovery was uneventful, and his regular follow-up revealed no recurrence even after two years.

CLINICAL DISCUSSION

HH predominantly affects females, but males can also be affected, as seen in this case. With observation, it can grow over time, particularly in patients under 50 years of age. Surgical management should be considered when HH causes symptoms or is larger than 10 cm. The evolving understanding of GHH and the critical role of surgery are important, particularly when they complicate haematological or coagulation profiles and lead to thrombocytopenia.

CONCLUSION

Our case report highlights the significance of surgical intervention in GHH, and a disease-free outcome can be expected for patients with this condition in the future. To our knowledge, this is the first such case report from Bangladesh.

Efficacy of radiofrequency ablation vs. transcatheter arterial embolization for hepatic hemangiomas

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) in the treatment of large hepatic hemangiomas (LHH) (5-9.9 cm in diameter).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

This study retrospectively collected data from 82 patients with LHH treated at Chaoyang Central Hospital. The study analyzed the differences in postoperative efficacy, operative time, blood routine, liver and kidney function on the first day after surgery, postoperative hospitalization time and postoperative complications.

RESULTS

There were statistically significant differences in indicators such as white blood cell count, alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase and total bilirubin on the first day after surgery between the RFA group (39 cases) and the TACE group (43 cases) ( P  < 0.001). Compared to RFA, LHH patients treated with TACE had a general complication rate of 39.5% (vs. 43.6%; P  = 0.7), a procedure-related complication rate of 30.2% (vs. 59.0%; P  = 0.009), an effective rate at 6-12 months postoperatively of 55.8% (vs. 82.1%; P  = 0.01), an operating-time of 41.2 ± 14.9 min (vs. 100.8 ± 35.5 min; P  < 0.001) and hospitalization costs of 17052.7 ± 1364.8 yuan (vs. 30952.1 ± 4327.6 yuan; P  < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

This study indicates that the efficacy of RFA in treating LHH is significantly superior to TACE. Microwave ablation and RFA appear to be safe treatments for LHH. The TACE group exhibited shorter operating-time, lower hospitalization costs and lower demands on cardiopulmonary function.

Hepatic adenoma: evolution of a more individualized treatment approach

BACKGROUND

Hepatic adenomas (HAs) are benign, solid liver lesions, which carry a risk of hemorrhage and malignant transformation. This review article highlights the advances in the diagnosis and management of HAs.

METHODS

A comprehensive review was performed using MEDLINE/PubMed and Web of Science databases with a search period ending on September 30, 2023. Using PubMed, the terms "hepatocellular," "hepatic," and "adenoma" were searched.

RESULTS

HA has been classified into at least 8 subtypes based on molecular pathology, each exhibiting unique histopathologic features, clinical considerations, and risk of malignant transformation. The most common subtype is inflammatory HA, followed by hepatocyte nuclear factor 1α-inactivated HA, β-catenin exon 3-mutated HA (βex3-HA), β-catenin exon 7- or 8-mutated HA, sonic hedgehog HA, and unclassified HA. Magnetic resonance imaging is the best imaging method for diagnosis and can distinguish among HA subtypes based on fat and telangiectasia pathologic characteristics. The risk of malignant transformation varies among molecular subtypes, ranging from <1% to approximately 50%. Up to 42% of HAs present with spontaneous intratumoral hemorrhage and peritoneal hemorrhage. In general, only 15% to 20% of patients require surgery. HA larger than 5 cm are more likely to be complicated by bleeding and malignant transformation, regardless of subtype, and should generally be resected. In particular, βex3-HA carries a high risk of malignant transformation and can be considered a true precancerous lesion.

CONCLUSION

The management of HAs is based on a multidisciplinary approach. Clinical decision-making should integrate information on gender, tumor size, and HA subtyping. In the future, patients with HA will benefit from novel medical therapies tailored to the individual molecular subtypes.

Percutaneous microwave ablation versus sclerotherapy for large hepatic hemangioma: a multi-center cohort study

OBJECTIVE

The study aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety of ultrasound-guided microwave ablation (MWA) and percutaneous sclerotherapy (PS) for the treatment of large hepatic hemangioma (LHH).

METHODS

This retrospective study included 96 patients who underwent MWA (n = 54) and PS (n = 42) as first-line treatment for LHH in three tertiary hospitals from January 2016 to December 2021. Primary outcomes were technique efficacy rate (volume reduction rate [VRR] > 50% at 12 months), symptom relief rate at 12 months and local tumor progression (LTP). Secondary outcomes included procedure time, major complications, treatment sessions, cost and one-, two-, three-year VRR.

RESULTS

During a median follow-up of 36 months, the MWA group showed a higher technique efficacy rate (100% vs. 90.4%, p = .018) and symptom relief rate (100% vs. 80%, p = .123) than the PS group. The MWA group had fewer treatment sessions, higher one-, two- and three-year VRR, lower LTP rate (all p < .05), longer procedure time and higher treatment costs than the PS group (both p < .001). MWA shared a comparable major complications rate (1.8% vs. 2.4%, p = .432) with PS. After multivariate analysis, the lesion's heterogeneity and maximum diameter >8.1 cm were independent risk factors for LTP (all p < .05). In the PS group, lesions with a cumulative dose of bleomycin > 0.115 mg/cm3 had a lower risk of LTP (p = .006).

CONCLUSIONS

Both MWA and PS treatments for large hepatic hemangioma are safe and effective, with MWA being superior in terms of efficacy.

Surgical indications for solid hepatic benign tumors: An updated literature review

Hepatic hemangioma, focal nodular hyperplasia, and hepatic adenoma are the most common benign solid liver tumors. However, their surgical indications have been the subject of debate. Minimally invasive liver resection reduces the cost of surgery and may lead to overtreatment of benign liver tumors. Recently, there has been a growing understanding of the etiology, pathogenesis, and natural history of these tumors. Great progress has also been made in imaging. The use of MRI and contrast agents has improved the accuracy of non-invasive diagnosis of these tumors, and especially in the identification of specific molecular subtypes of liver adenoma. These factors have resulted in alterations of surgical indications for these tumors. This article examines recent literature and it discusses the surgical indications for hepatic hemangioma, focal nodular hyperplasia, and hepatic adenoma while summarizing modifications in clinical management.

Hepatic hemangioma: proportion and predictor of surgical treatment with emphasis on its growth rate

BACKGROUND/AIMS

There are limited studies on the management of hepatic hemangiomas (HHs). We investigated the proportion and predictors of surgical resection and analyzed HH growth rates in addition to associated factors.

METHODS

A retrospective case-control study of patients treated in 2 centers was conducted. Thirty-six patients who underwent surgical resection were assigned to the case group. Patients who did not undergo surgical treatment were randomly sigselected at a 1:10 ratio and assigned to the control group (n = 360). Baseline characteristics, clinical course and surgical outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS

The proportion of surgically treated HH patients was 0.3% (36 per 11,049). The longest diameter at diagnosis (mean ± standard deviation) was 7.7 ± 5.2 cm in the case group and 2.4 ± 1.8 cm in the control group (p < 0.001). In the multivariate analysis, the presence of more than 2 HHs (odds ratio [OR] 7.64, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.40-41.72) and a growth rate of more than 4.8%/year (OR 30.73, 95% CI 4.86-194.51) were independently associated with surgical treatment. Symptom development during follow-up was related to HH size > 10 cm (OR 10.50, 95% CI 1.06-103.77, p = 0.04). The subgroup analysis showed substantial growth in 41.3% with an overall mean annual growth rate of 0.14 cm.

CONCLUSION

Approximately one in 300 patients with an HH underwent surgical treatment. Multiple HHs and a growth rate of more than 4.8%/year were indications for surgical treatment. Nearly half of the HHs showed growing pattern in our study.

Surgery for symptomatic hepatic hemangioma: Resection vs. enucleation, an experience over two decades

Backgrounds/Aims

Hemangiomas are the most common benign liver lesions; however, they are usually asymptomatic and seldom require surgery. Enucleation and resection are the most commonly performed surgical procedures for symptomatic lesions. This study aims to compare the outcomes of these two surgical techniques.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of symptomatic hepatic hemangiomas (HH) operated upon between 2000 and 2021. Patients were categorized into the enucleation and resection groups. Demographic profile, intraoperative bleeding, and morbidity (Clavien-Dindo Grade) were compared. Independent t-test and chi-square tests were used for continuous and categorical variables respectively. p-value of < 0.05 was considered significant.

Results

Sixteen symptomatic HH patients aged 30 to 66 years underwent surgery (enucleation = 8, resection = 8) and majority were females (n = 10 [62.5%]). Fifteen patients presented with abdominal pain, and one patient had an interval increase in the size of the lesion from 9 to 12 cm. The size of hemangiomas varied from 6 to 23 cm. The median blood loss (enucleation: 350 vs. resection: 600 mL), operative time (enucleation: 5.8 vs. resection: 7.5 hours), and postoperative hospital stay (enucleation: 6.5 vs. resection: 11 days) were greater in the resection group (statistically insignificant). In the resection group, morbidity was significantly higher (62.6% vs. 12.5%, p = 0.05), including one mortality. All patients remained asymptomatic during the follow-up.

Conclusions

Enucleation was simpler with less morbidity as compared to resection in our series. However, considering the small number of patients, further studies are needed with comparable groups to confirm the superiority of enucleation over resection.

Thermal ablation of hepatic hemangioma: A multi-center experience with long-term outcomes

BACKGROUND

Thermal ablation, currently used extensively for liver tumors, also has been applied. successfully to hepatic hemangioma; however, it is still considered experimental because previous studies have comprised small sample sizes with short follow-up periods.

PURPOSE

We aimed to investigate the effectiveness, safety, and long-term outcomes of thermal ablation for hepatic hemangioma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From October 2011 to February 2021, the data of 357 patients with 378 hepatic hemangiomas treated by thermal ablation at six hospitals were analyzed in this retrospective study. The technical success, safety, and long-term follow-up results were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 252 patients (mean age, 49.2 ± 10.5 years) with 273 subcapsular hemangiomas underwent laparoscopic thermal ablation, whereas 105 patients with 105 hemangiomas located in the liver parenchyma underwent CT-guided percutaneous ablation. Of the 378 hepatic hemangiomas (5.0-21.2 cm), 369 lesions were subjected to one session of ablation, while 9 lesions were subjected to two sessions of ablation. Technical success was achieved in 100.0% of cases. Complete ablation was achieved in 361 of 378 hemangiomas (95.5%), while 17 hemangiomas (4.5%) were incompletely ablated, showing subtle enhancement at the peripheral rim. The major complication rate was 2.0% (7/357). The median follow-up period was 67 months (range, 12-124 months). Of the 224 patients with hemangioma-related symptoms, 216 demonstrated complete disappearance of symptoms (96.4%), while 8 were ameliorated (3.6%). Ablated lesion shrinkage was progressive, and 11.4% of hemangiomas almost completely disappeared over time (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

With a reasonable ablation strategy and comprehensive treatment measurements, thermal ablation could be a safe, feasible, and effective treatment option for hepatic hemangioma.

Feasibility of laparoscopic enucleation for hemangioma in special hepatic segments

Background and aim

This study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic enucleation for liver hemangioma in special hepatic segments.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 58 patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery for hepatic hemangioma at a single center from January 2016 to January 2022. Segments I, IVa, VII, and VIII are defined as special hepatic segments, attributing to the bad visualization and adjacent to important vessels such as hepatic veins and inferior vena cava that lead to a high risk in laparoscopic surgery. Patients were categorized into a special location group (SLG) and a normal location group (NLG) according to the location of hemangioma. General data, intraoperative and postoperative outcomes, and postoperative complications of the two groups were compared and analyzed.

Results

There were no significant differences in age (p = 0.288), gender (p = 0.331), body mass index (p = 0.168), the maximum diameter of hemangioma (p = 0.330), ASA risk grading (p = 0.615), and comorbidities (p > 0.05) between the two groups. The operation time (p < 0.001), intraoperative blood loss (p < 0.001), and intraoperative blood transfusion rate (p = 0.047) were significantly higher in the SLG. The rate of conversion to laparotomy was higher in the SLG, but there was no significant difference (p = 0.089). In addition, the exhaust time (p = 0.03) and postoperative hospital stay (p < 0.01) were significantly shorter in the NLG. The postoperative complications were comparable between the two groups, and there were no perioperative deaths.

Conclusion

Laparoscopic enucleation of hemangioma in special hepatic segments is difficult and has a critical risk of massive bleeding during surgery. Meanwhile, it is also safe, feasible, and effective.

A Comprehensive Review of Hepatic Hemangioma Management

BACKGROUND

Hepatic hemangiomas (HHs) are benign liver lesions often discovered incidentally on imaging for various unrelated pathologies. We herein review the etiology, classification, diagnostic imaging, and management of HHs.

METHODS

A comprehensive systematic review was performed utilizing MEDLINE/PubMed and Web of Science databases, with the end of search date being March 1, 2022, regarding HH diagnosis, imaging, and management.

RESULTS

HHs can be broadly classified as capillary hemangiomas or cavernous hemangiomas. While the exact pathophysiology related to the development of HHs remains largely unknown, hormone exposure has been postulated to cause HH growth. HHs appear homogenously hyperechoic on US with distinct margins and posterior acoustic enhancement. While cavernous hemangiomas appear as well-defined hypodense lesions on pre-contrast CT images with the same density as the vasculature, one of the most reliable imaging features for diagnosing cavernous hemangiomas is high signal intensity on T2 weighted images. While most HHs are asymptomatic, some patients can present with pain or compressive symptoms with bleeding/rupture being very rare. Kasabach-Merritt syndrome is a rare but life-threatening condition associated with thrombocytopenia and microangiopathic hemolytic anemia. When HHs are symptomatic or in the setting of Kasabach Merritt syndrome, surgery is indicated. Enucleation is an attractive surgical option for HH as it spares normal liver tissue. Most patients experience symptom relief following surgical resection.

CONCLUSION

HHs are very common benign liver lesions. High-quality imaging is imperative to distinguish HHs from other liver lesions. Surgery is generally reserved for patients who present with symptoms such as pain, obstruction, or rarely Kasabach-Merritt syndrome. Surgery can involve either formal resection or, in most instances, simple enucleation. Patients generally have good outcomes following surgery with resolution of their symptoms.

Enucleation versus hepatectomy for hepatic hemangiomas: A meta-analysis

Objective

To compare the safety and efficacy of enucleation and hepatectomy for the treatment of hepatic hemangioma (HH).

Methods

A systematic literature search was conducted to identify studies evaluating enucleation versus hepatectomy for HH starting from the time of database creation to February 2022. Extraction of the data used in this study was done from the literature. The differences between the two surgical approaches were evaluated by comparing and analyzing the relevant data by means of meta-analysis.

Results

A total of 1,384 patients (726 underwent enucleation, and 658 with hepatectomy) were included in our meta-analysis from 12 studies. Enucleations were associated with favorable outcomes in terms of operation time [mean difference (MD): −39.76, 95% confidence interval (CI): −46.23, −33.30], blood loss (MD: −300.42, 95% CI: −385.64, −215.19), length of hospital stay (MD: −2.33, 95% CI: −3.22, −1.44), and postoperative complications (OR: 0.57, 95% CI: 0.44–0.74). There were no differences between the groups in terms of patients needing transfusion (OR: 0.85, 95% CI: 0.50, 1.42), inflow occlusion time (MD: 1.72, 95% CI: −0.27, 3.71), and 30-day postoperative mortality (OR: 0.23, 95% CI: 0.02–2.17).

Conclusion

Compared with hepatectomy, enucleation is found to be effective at reducing postoperative complications, blood loss, and operation time and shortening the length of hospital stay. Enucleation is similar to hepatectomy in terms of inflow occlusion time, 30-day postoperative mortality, and patients needing transfusing to hepatectomy.

Case Report: Spontaneous Rupture of Hepatic Hemangioma

Background

Hepatic hemangioma (HH) is a congenital vasal malformation that seemed like the most probable benign liver neoplasm, composed of masses of blood vessels, which are anomalous in arrangement and size. In most cases, HH is asymptomatic, and patients have an excellent prognosis. According to research, the location and size of the mass are correlated with the symptoms and complications. Reports of spontaneous rupture of HH have been less reported in the literature. In this emergency condition, dynamic contrast-enhanced CT scanning, especially triple-phase computed tomography (CT) with delayed imaging, is preferred.

Case Presentation

Here, we presented two middle-aged female patients with spontaneous rupture of HH in our hospital. Following an accurate diagnosis of enhanced CT and emergency surgery, patients recovered well and were discharged from the hospital.

Conclusion

Appropriate imaging studies, especially enhanced CT, and emergency surgery are indispensable for patients with spontaneous rupture of HH. As a surgeon, we need to pay attention to the asymptomatic patient with HH.

Giant Hepatic Hemangioma Causing Prolonged Fever and Indicated for Resection

Hepatic hemangiomas are benign liver tumors, and most of them progress asymptomatically. We report a case of hepatic hemangioma considered the cause of fever. A 53-year-old woman had a fever of 40°C for about 3 months without infection. Hepatic hemangiomas with internal bleeding of 10 cm in size on liver S8/7 and S3/2 were observed. These were resected laparoscopically for diagnostic treatment. She was afebrile after the operation. The pathological diagnosis was hematoma inside cavernous hemangioma. It should be noted that a bleeding hepatic hemangioma may cause fever of unknown origin and be indicated for resection.

A Nomogram Model for Predicting the Response to Transcatheter Arterial Embolization in Patients With Symptomatic Hepatic Hemangioma

Background: Transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) is regarded as an effective treatment for patients with symptomatic hepatic hemangioma. However, few studies have evaluated the efficacy of TAE alone for treating hepatic hemangioma. The aim of this study was to identify the factors that influence the response to TAE and formulate a quantitative nomogram to optimize the individualized management of hepatic hemangioma.

Methods: We retrospectively studied 276 patients treated with TAE for hepatic hemangioma at our center from January 2011 to December 2019. The full cohort was randomly divided into training and validation cohorts. After assessing the potential predictive factors for the efficacy of TAE in the training cohort, a nomogram model was established and evaluated by discrimination and calibration.

Results: During follow-up, the symptom relief rate was 100%. The tumor blood supply (p < 0.001), tumor number (p = 0.004), and tumor size (p = 0.006) were identified as significant predictors of the failure of tumor shrinkage in response to TAE. The nomogram model showed favorable discrimination and calibration, with a C-index of 0.775 (95% CI, 0.705–0.845) in the training cohort, which was further confirmed in the validation cohort (C-index 0.768; 95% CI, 0.680–0.856). The side effects of TAE were relatively minor and included mainly abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, fever, and the presence of elevated hepatic transaminases.

Conclusion: TAE is a safe and effective treatment for symptomatic hepatic hemangioma. The established nomogram performed well for the estimation of the effect of TAE in patients with hepatic hemangioma and can facilitate the selection of patients who would benefit most from the treatment.

Spontaneous regression of liver hemangiomas: a single-institution analysis of 46 patients

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine the nature of spontaneous regression of liver hemangiomas.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The records of the liver hemangioma patients who attended the out-patient clinic between 1988 and 2018 were evaluated. The data of the 716 adult patients who were followed for at least 3 years with cross-sectional imaging were analyzed.

RESULTS

Spontaneous regression was documented in 46 patients (6.4%). Twenty-eight patients had a single hemangioma (61%), eight (17%) had two hemangiomas; the other 10 patients had 3-6 hemangiomas. Of the 87 lesions in 46 patients, 69 actually regressed during the study. Twelve patients with more than one lesion exhibited discordant courses - one of the hemangiomas of a patient with multiple lesions regressed, whereas the other enlarged or remained stable. Eleven of the regressed hemangiomas exhibited enlargement first, followed by spontaneous regression. Fourteen (20%) of the regressed hemangiomas acquired atypical characteristics that would have suggested a malignancy had the original films been unavailable.

CONCLUSION

Spontaneous regression of liver hemangiomas is an underrecognized phenomenon. Enlargement should not be a straightforward indication for intervention because it may be followed by regression. A regressed hemangioma should be considered in the differential diagnosis of liver lesions suspicious for malignancy.

Real-world data on the clinicopathological traits and outcomes of hospitalized liver hemangioma patients: a multicenter study

Background

There is currently a lack of consensus regarding the clinical features, diagnosis, treatment indications and options, and risk assessment of hepatic hemangioma patients.

Methods

This was a multicenter, real-world study that analyzed a large number of hepatic hemangioma cases in China and included patient data on epidemiology, diagnosis, treatment methods, and outcomes.

Results

A total of 5,143 patients hospitalized for hepatic hemangioma were included, of whom 34.42% were male and 65.58% were female. The age distribution was concentrated between 30 and 60 years old, accounting for 87.41% of the patients. Among the hepatic hemangioma patients, 60.8% had only one tumor, with the most common pathological type being cavernous hemangioma (96.07% of cases). The treatment motivations and indications included anxiety, obvious clinical symptoms, rapid tumor growth, unclear diagnoses and acute emergencies. Overall, 41.4% of the patients were treated for psychological reasons, while 30.59% were treated because they presented obvious (primarily nonspecific) clinical symptoms. Hepatic resection was the main therapeutic method and was based on various indications. There were a small number of patients with Kasabach-Merritt syndrome, according to its generally recognized definition.

Conclusions

Most patients in this study who were hospitalized for hepatic hemangioma did not meet the indications for requiring treatment. Surveillance is the recommended course of action for definitively diagnosed hepatic hemangioma, and a new classification system is needed to standardize the diagnosis of this condition.

Liver Resection for Giant Hepatic Cavernous Hemangioma

Liver hemangiomas are common. Giant liver hemangiomas are rare and symptomatic patients require treatment. Surgery is the curative procedure. Other options such as intra-arterial embolization may be used to decrease the volume and bleeding of these lesions. Three cases of giant liver hemangioma were treated with liver resection, one with left lateral hepatectomy and two with right lateral hepatectomy. All patients had made an uneventful recovery with no recurrence at 3-year follow-up. Most hemangiomas are small, asymptomatic, and do not require any treatment. Liver resection is a safe and effective treatment for giant hemangiomas.

Laparoscopic or open treatment for hepatic alveolar echinococcosis: A single-institution experience

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of laparoscopy in the treatment of hepatic alveolar echinococcosis (AE).

METHODS

Between January 2018 and December 2019, 213 hepatic AE patients were admitted to the authors' institution. Among them, 165 patients (77.46%, 165/213) underwent surgery. Of 13 patients who underwent laparoscopic treatment, two required conversion to open surgery. The remaining 11 patients (group 1) were analyzed. During the same period, 154 patients underwent open surgery, but only 14 records were compatible with the criteria for the laparoscopic approach and were reviewed retrospectively (group 2).

RESULTS

Conversion to open surgery occurred in two cases. Both groups were basically consistent in terms of detailed demographic data, characteristics of the lesions, and surgical strategy (P > 0.05). The laparoscopic group not only achieved the same R0 resection as the open group, but the results were also significantly superior to those of the open group in terms of postoperative complications, postoperative catheterization time, and postoperative hospital stay (P = 0.042, P = 0.046, and P = 0.045, respectively). No recurrences were observed in either group during this period.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic surgery provides a safe and efficacious approach for hepatic AE in selected patients. Large, prospective, randomized trials are needed to confirm its superiority.

Outcomes of surgery for giant hepatic hemangioma

BACKGROUND

The surgical indications for liver hemangioma remain unclear.

METHODS

Data from 152 patients with hepatic hemangioma who underwent hepatectomy between 2004 and 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. We analyzed characteristics including tumor size, surgical parameters, and variables associated with Kasabach-Merritt syndrome and compared the outcomes of laparoscopic and open hepatectomy. Here, we describe surgical techniques for giant hepatic hemangioma and report on two meaningful cases.

RESULTS

Most (63.8%) patients with hepatic hemangioma were asymptomatic. Most (86.4%) tumors from patients with Kasabach-Merritt syndrome were larger than 15 cm. Enucleation (30.9%), sectionectomy (28.9%), hemihepatectomy (25.7%), and the removal of more than half of the liver (14.5%) were performed through open (87.5%) and laparoscopic (12.5%) approaches. Laparoscopic hepatectomy is associated with an operative time, estimated blood loss, and major morbidity and mortality rate similar to those of open hepatectomy, but a shorter length of stay. 3D image reconstruction is an alternative for diagnosis and surgical planning for partial hepatectomy.

CONCLUSION

The main indication for surgery is giant (> 10 cm) liver hemangioma, with or without symptoms. Laparoscopic hepatectomy was an effective option for hepatic hemangioma treatment. For extremely giant hemangiomas, 3D image reconstruction was indispensable. Hepatectomy should be performed by experienced hepatic surgeons.

Revisiting the Surgical Management of Giant Hepatic Hemangiomas: Enucleation Versus Anatomical Resection?

BACKGROUND

Resection is rarely indicated in giant hepatic hemangiomas (HHs) that are symptomatic. Enucleation (EN), compared with anatomical resection (AR), is considered the better technique to resect them as EN has been reported to have lower morbidity while conserving the normal liver tissue. But no study has yet clearly established the superiority of EN over AR. In addition, the independent predictors of postoperative morbidity have not been established.

METHODS

All consecutive patients operated for HH at two specialized hepatobiliary centers were reviewed. Patient demographics, operative variables, and postoperative outcomes were analyzed and compared between two techniques. Postoperative complications were graded as per Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications. The aims of this study were to compare two techniques of HH resection with respect to postoperative outcomes and to identify the risk factors for 90-day major postoperative morbidity and mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 64 patients, including 41 who underwent AR, 22 who underwent EN, and 1 who underwent liver transplantation, were operated for hemangiomas during the study period. Ten patients (9 who were operated for hemangiomas of size ≤4 cm and 1 who underwent transplantation) were excluded. Fifty-four patients, the majority being women (85%), with a median age of 48 years, were operated for giant HH. These patients were classified into two groups based on the technique of resection, namely, EN (22 patients) and AR (32 patients). Both groups were comparable in all aspects except that the number of liver segments resected was significantly more with AR. Postoperative outcomes were similar in both groups. Independent predictors of 90-day major complications including mortality were the use of total vascular exclusion (relative risk [RR]: 2.3, p = 0.028) and duration of surgery >4.5 h (RR: 2.3, p = 0.025).

CONCLUSION

Both techniques yield similar results with respect to 90-day postoperative morbidity and mortality. The choice of technique should be based on the location of tumor and simplicity of liver resection.

Pyrexia of Unknown Origin: An Atypical Presentation of Hepatic Hemangioma

Pyrexia of unknown origin (PUO) has been a diagnostic challenge for decades. Hepatic hemangioma (HH) is not a common differential diagnosis of PUO. It is the most common benign hepatic tumor, commonly asymptomatic and incidentally detected, or can present with vague abdominal pain. PUO is a rare presenting feature. We describe a case of 38-year-old lady presenting with PUO. With no other identifiable source of fever despite exhaustive investigations, a giant hemangioma in right lobe of liver detected on abdominal ultrasonography was deemed to be the cause of PUO. The patient had sudden decrease in hemoglobin while undergoing workup, which on imaging showed a bleeding hemangioma and right hepatectomy was performed. Patient had an uneventful recovery and her PUO also resolved after surgery. HH should be considered a rare diagnosis of exclusion for PUO after a standard algorithmic approach does not reveal any other cause.

Percutaneous ultrasound-guided 'three-step' radiofrequency ablation for giant hepatic hemangioma (5-15 cm): a safe and effective new technique

Purpose: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of percutaneous ultrasound-guided 'three-step' radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for the treatment of giant hepatic hemangioma.Materials and methods: Patients with giant hepatic hemangioma who underwent percutaneous ultrasound-guided 'three-step' RFA (n = 52) and conventional RFA (n = 54) at our center from June 2013 to December 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. The 'three-step' RFA proceeds as follows. Step 1: Ablate the feeding artery of the hemangioma. Step 2: Aspirate blood from the tumor. Step 3: Ablation the lesion. Intraoperative information, postoperative recovery, therapeutic effects, and complications were compared between the two groups.Results: The duration of RFA was significantly shorter (19.2 ± 0.8 min versus 44.5 ± 2.8 min, p < 0.001), the number of punctures was significantly lower (3.2 ± 0.1 versus 4.7 ± 0.3, p = 0.002), and the duration of hospital stay was significantly shorter (9.0 ± 0.5 versus 11.5 ± 0.7, p = 0.013) in the TS-RFA group than in the C-RFA group. The complete ablation rate (86.5% versus 40.7%), the maximum postoperative pain score (2.5 ± 1.3 versus 4.1 ± 2.0) and symptom relief were also significantly better in the TS-RFA group than in the C-RFA group (p < 0.05). No postoperative death occurred in either group. There were no grade III or higher complications in the TS-RFA group, but one patient in the C-RFA group developed the grade III complication of postoperative abdominal bleeding.Conclusions: 'Three-step' RFA is a safe and effective minimally invasive treatment for giant hepatic hemangioma. It is worthy of further promotion and application.

Giant hepatic hemangioma case report: When is it time for surgery?

We describe a case of a 30-year-old man who complained intermitted pain in right abdominal flank; a large cavernoumatos hemangioma – up to 6 cm in size – was revealed in the fifth hepatic segment using Ultrasonography and MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imaging).

Indications for treatment – based on imaging features and clinical data – are briefly discussed in our report, providing also a review of existing literature.

•

Giant hemangiomas can become an invalidant condition.

•

Magnetic Resonance Imaging is the most sensitive radiological technique.

•

Giant hemangiomas are suscettibile of a laparoscopic approach

Heme is involved in the systemic inflammatory response following radiofrequency ablation of hepatic hemangiomas

OBJECTIVE

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is an effective and minimally invasive treatment for managing hepatic hemangiomas. Systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) often occurs with hemoglobinuria, and its underlying pathophysiological mechanism is unknown. Heme can trigger inflammation by inducing the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and the production of inflammatory mediators. We therefore investigated whether circulating heme is involved in SIRS following RFA of hepatic hemangiomas.

METHODS

We enrolled 65 patients with hepatic hemangioma who underwent RFA. Serum concentrations of free heme, ROS, and tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α) were measured after RFA. Univariate analysis and a multivariate binary logistic regression model were used to evaluate the contribution of 17 risk factors for SIRS after RFA.

RESULTS

Fifty-nine (59/65, 90.8%) patients developed hemoglobinuria, among which 25 (25/59, 42.4%) experienced SIRS shortly after RFA. In the SIRS group, the serum concentrations of heme, ROS, and TNF-α were immediately elevated after RFA compared with baseline and slowly regained their normal levels 3 days after RFA. Moreover, the concentrations of circulating heme significantly correlated with those of ROS (r = 0.805, P < 0.001) and TNF-α (r = 0.797, P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that the volume of hemangioma [odds ratio (OR) = 1.293, P = 0.031], time of ablation (OR = 1.194, P = 0.029) as well as the concentrations of heme (OR = 1.430, P = 0.017), ROS (OR = 1.251, P = 0.031), and TNF-α (OR = 1.309, P = 0.032) were significantly associated with SIRS.

CONCLUSION

Circulating heme was associated with the induction of ROS and the production of TNF-α, which may contribute to the induction of SIRS following RFA of hepatic hemangiomas.

Microwave ablation versus transcatheter arterial embolization for large hepatic hemangiomas: clinical outcomes

PURPOSE

To evaluate the safety and effect of microwave ablation (MWA) compared with transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) for the treatment of large hepatic hemangiomas.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 135 patients with symptomatic or/and enlarging hepatic hemangiomas (5-10 cm) from two centers underwent either MWA (n = 82) or TAE (n = 53) as first-line treatment. We compared the two groups in terms of radiologic response, clinical response, operative time, postoperative analgesic requirements, hospital stay and complications.

RESULTS

MWA had a significantly higher rate of complete radiologic response (89.0% vs. 37.7%, p<.001) and complete clinical response (88.6% vs. 69.2%, p=.046), fewer minor complications (43.9% vs. 66.0%, p=.019), shorter time of using analgesics (p<.001) and shorter hospital stays (p=.003) than did TAE. The operative time and major complications were comparable between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Both MWA and TAE are safe and effective in treating patients with large hepatic hemangiomas. MWA had a higher rate of complete response than did TAE, and it was associated with fewer minor complications, faster recovery and shorter hospital stay.

Benign Liver Tumors

Background

Due to the frequent use of medical imaging including ultrasonography, the incidence of benign liver tumors has increased. There is a large variety of different solid benign liver tumors, of which hemangioma, focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH), and hepatocellular adenoma (HCA) are the most frequent. Advanced imaging techniques allow precise diagnosis in most of the patients, which reduces the need for biopsies only to limited cases. Patients with benign liver tumors are mostly asymptomatic and do not need any kind of treatment. Symptoms can be abdominal pain and pressure effects on adjacent structures. The 2 most serious complications are bleeding and malignant transformation.

Summary

This review focuses on hepatic hemangioma (HH), FNH, and HCA, and provides an overview on clinical presentations, surgical and interventional treatment, as well as conservative management. Treatment options for HHs, if indicated, include liver resection, radiofrequency ablation, and transarterial catheter embolization, and should be carefully weighed against possible complications. FNH is the most frequent benign liver tumor without any risk of malignant transformation, and treatment should only be restricted to symptomatic patients. HCA is associated with the use of oral contraceptives or other steroid medications. Unlike other benign liver tumors, HCA may be complicated by malignant transformation. HCAs have been divided into 6 subtypes based on molecular and pathological features with different risk of complication.

Key Message

The vast majority of benign liver tumors remain asymptomatic, do not increase in size, and rarely need treatment. Biopsies are usually not needed as accurate diagnosis can be obtained using modern imaging techniques.

Debulking of giant liver hemangiomas with severe symptoms: a case report

Background

There are no previous reports of debulking of giant liver hemangioma. This report describes our experience with debulking surgery for a patient with bilateral giant liver hemangiomas with severe symptoms.

Case presentation

We present a case of symptomatic giant liver hemangioma in a 41-year-old woman. She presented with abdominal pain and fullness at a local hospital and underwent trans-arterial embolization (TAE). TAE was not effective, and she was not able to walk a long distance. Giant liver hemangiomas, 30 cm and 15 cm in diameter, were located in the right liver and in the left lateral section, respectively, and normal liver parenchyma with tiny liver hemangiomas was present in segment 4. The liver function was normal. However, right hemi-hepatectomy with left lateral sectionectomy was considered to be risky according to the 3DCT volumetry. Therefore, we performed right hemi-hepatectomy in order to reduce her symptoms. The postoperative course was uneventful, and she was discharged on the 14th day after surgery. The abdominal fullness and abdominal pain disappeared immediately after surgery. The hemangiomas in the remnant liver, 15 cm in diameter, showed no change, and she is well without symptoms 7 years after surgery.

Conclusions

Debulking surgery is one of the options for bilateral giant liver hemangiomas with severe symptoms.

Surgical indication and strategy for liver hemangioma in the caudate lobe: a multi-institutional retrospective analysis with 137 patients

Objective

To investigate the surgical indication and tactics for liver hemangioma in the caudate lobe

Methods

From January 1994 to July 2019, 137 patients, including 51 males and 86 females with the average age of 49.2 years old were diagnosed with liver hemangioma in caudate lobe and received treatment at five tertiary referral hospitals. Clinical features, correlations between tumor size and clinical manifestations, treatments, and prognosis were analyzed.

Results

Of the 137 patients identified, 40 (29.20%) patients were asymptomatic, whereas other 94 patients had clinical symptoms mainly presented as upper abdominal discomfort, epigastric distention, upper abdominal dull pain, nausea, and vomiting. Fifteen (93.75%), 18 (39.13%), and 7 (10.45%) patients presented no clinical symptoms among those tumor size was less than 3 cm (D ≤ 3 cm, n = 16), 3 cm < D ≤ 6 cm (n = 46), and 6 cm < D ≤ 9 cm (n = 67), respectively, while all 8 patients with tumor larger than 9 cm were symptomatic. Tumor diameter was obviously associated with the presence of clinical symptoms. In follow-up period, 7 patients in the conservative group (n = 39) received surgery because of tumor growth or symptom appearance. Totally 105 patients received operation including partial resection or isolated complete resection of caudate lobe and caudate lobe resection combined with liver segment resection, right liver resection, or left liver resection. All operations went smoothly, and no severe complications appeared.

Conclusion

Tumor diameter was obviously associated with the presence of clinical symptoms in patients with hemangioma in caudate lobe. Surgical therapy is not recommended for asymptomatic patients and available for patient who has symptoms. Effective surgical strategies should be put into use to reduce operative bleeding.

Current concepts in ablative procedures for primary benign liver lesions: a step forward to minimize the invasiveness of treatment when deemed necessary

With increased use of medical imaging, the incidental detection of benign solid liver tumors has become more frequent. Facing with benign disease, the indications for surgery are still object of discussion in light of the stable natural course of most lesions and obvious drawbacks of any surgical intervention; therefore, in most situations, a conservative approach is recommended, and surgery is mainly reserved for those cases with persistent or worsening symptoms, or who are at risk for complications as malignant transformation. The advent of ablative techniques has widened the range of treatment options available to these patients, presenting as a valid alternative to resection in terms of safety and efficacy in selected cases, particularly in patients who are considered poor surgical candidates and with smaller lesions. This review outlines the role of percutaneous ablative methods for benign solid liver tumors that are encountered in adults, providing a per histology analysis of the existing evidence. The up-to-date strategies for management of the most common benign solid tumors are recapitulated.

Outcomes of ultrasound-guided percutaneous microwave ablation versus surgical resection for symptomatic large hepatic hemangiomas

Purpose: Microwave ablation (MWA) has become increasingly popular as a minimally invasive treatment for benign and malignant liver tumors. However, few studies have demonstrated the benefits and disadvantages of MWA compared to surgical resection (SR) for large hepatic hemangiomas. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of MWA compared to SR for large (5-10 cm) hepatic hemangiomas. Methods and materials: This retrospective comparative study included 112 patients with large, symptomatic hepatic hemangiomas who had been treated with MWA (n = 44) or SR (n = 68) and followed up for a median of 44 months using enhanced computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Intraoperative information, postoperative recovery time, postoperative discomfort and complications and treatment effectiveness between groups were compared using a chi-square test or an independent t-test. Results: The operative time was significantly shorter (31.3 ± 21.76 versus 148.1 ± 59.3 min, p < .001) and the blood loss (10.2 ± 60.6 versus 227.9 ± 182.9 mL, p < .0001) and rate of prophylactic abdominal drainage [1 (2.3%) versus 57 (83.8%), p < .001] were significantly lower in the MWA group than in the SR group. Postoperative recovery of the MWA group in regard to indwelling catheter time, normal diet time, incision cicatrization time and hospital stay (p < .001) was significantly better than the SR group. However, no statistically significant difference in effectiveness was noted between the groups (p = .58). Conclusions: MWA may be as effective as SR, and potentially safer for treating large, symptomatic hepatic hemangiomas. To confirm our findings, large-sample, multicentered, randomized controlled trials are needed.

Hepatic hemangioma: What internists need to know

Hepatic hemangioma (HH) is the most common benign liver tumor and it is usually found incidentally during radiological studies. This tumor arises from a vascular malformation; however, the pathophysiology has not been clearly elucidated. Symptoms usually correlate with the size and location of the tumor. Less commonly the presence of a large HH may cause life-threatening conditions. The diagnosis can be established by the identification of HH hallmarks in several imaging studies. In patients that present with abdominal symptoms other etiologies should be excluded first before attributing HH as the cause. In asymptomatic patient’s treatment is not required and follow up is usually reserved for HH of more than 5 cm. Symptomatic patients can be managed surgically or with other non-surgical modalities such as transcatheter arterial embolization or radiofrequency ablation. Enucleation surgery has shown to have fewer complications as compared to hepatectomy or other surgical techniques. Progression of the tumor is seen in less than 40%. Hormone stimulation may play a role in HH growth; however, there are no contraindications for hormonal therapy in patients with HH due to the lack of concrete evidence. When clinicians encounter this condition, they should discern between observation and surgical or non-surgical management based on the clinical presentation.

Resection as first-line therapy for large hepatic sclerosing hemangioma: a case report

Hepatic sclerosing hemangioma is a rare benign disease that occurs in association with hepatic cavernous hemangioma degeneration and sclerosis. Recent studies have shown that radiofrequency (RF) ablation is an alternative treatment for hepatic cavernous hemangiomas, even for large hemangiomas (≥10 cm). However, RF ablation might not be suitable to treat large sclerosing hemangiomas. We herein report the successful surgical removal of a large hepatic sclerosing hemangioma after RF ablation treatment failure in a 65-year-old man. In conclusion, we suggest that resection should be chosen as a first-line therapy for the disease.

Impact of open and minimally invasive resection of symptomatic solid benign liver tumours on symptoms and quality of life: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

The value of open and minimally invasive liver resection for symptomatic solid benign liver tumours (BLT) such as hepatocellular adenoma, focal nodular hyperplasia and haemangioma is being debated. A systematic review on symptom relief, quality of life (QoL) and surgical outcome after both open and minimally invasive surgery for solid BLT is currently lacking.

METHODS

A systematic search in PubMed and EMBASE was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines (January 1985-April 2018). Articles reporting pre-and postoperative symptoms or QoL in patients undergoing open or minimally surgery for BLT were evaluated. Methodological quality was assessed using the MINORS tool.

RESULTS

Forty-two studies were included with 4061 patients undergoing surgery for BLT, 3536 (87%) open and 525 (13%) laparoscopic resections. Randomized and propensity-matched studies were lacking. Symptoms were the indication for resection in 56% of the patients. After a weighted mean of 28.5 months follow-up after surgery, symptoms were relieved in 82% of symptomatic patients. Validated QoL tools were used in eight studies, of which two found significant better QoL scores following laparoscopic compared to open surgery.

DISCUSSION

Resection of symptomatic BLT seems safe and relieves symptoms in the vast majority of selected patients. Comparative studies are needed before more firm conclusions can be drawn.

Invasive management of symptomatic hepatic hemangioma

Hepatic hemangioma is common among benign liver tumors and usually grows slowly. About 50-70% of hepatic hemangiomas are asymptomatic, and management is not necessary; however, management should be considered in symptomatic patients. The optimal management of symptomatic hepatic hemangioma depends on multiple factors. Invasive management of symptomatic hepatic hemangioma mainly consists of surgery and interventional radiology, including transarterial embolization, ablation, percutaneous sclerotherapy, and percutaneous argon-helium cryotherapy. Although both surgery and interventional radiology are promising in the management of symptomatic hepatic hemangioma, multiple and/or giant hemangiomas represent a clinical dilemma because the complication rate and recurrence rate are relatively high, and symptom relief is not always achieved. However, a review of recent advances in treatment is lacking. We therefore summarized the current invasive management techniques for symptomatic hepatic hemangioma to potentially facilitate clinical decision-making.

Spontaneous rupture of giant hepatic hemangioma: misdiagnosis as gastrointestinal perforation

Hepatic hemangioma is a frequent nonmalignant tumor in the human liver. Although rupture of hepatic hemangioma is a rare complication, it may have serious consequences. In this report, we describe a 56-year-old woman who underwent laparoscopic surgery and open surgery for sudden abdominal pain and peritonitis. Gastrointestinal perforation was prioritized before surgery according to the patient’s symptoms, signs, and radiological report. A giant dark red mass connected to the left liver by a pedicle was unexpectedly found during intraoperative exploration. Hemoperitoneum was also found. Conversely, no gastrointestinal perforation was found during intraoperative exploration. The mass was successfully removed, and the hemoperitoneum was resolved. Postoperative pathological examination showed that the mass was a hepatic hemangioma. Ultimately, the patient was diagnosed with spontaneous rupture of a giant hepatic hemangioma.

The value of 3D visualization operative planning system in ultrasound-guided percutaneous microwave ablation for large hepatic hemangiomas: a clinical comparative study

Background

To evaluate the value of a three dimension (3D)visualization operative planning system in ultrasound-guided percutaneous microwave ablation (US-PMWA) for large hepatic hemangiomas (LHHs).

Methods

Fifty-eight patients with LHHs were divided into 3D and 2D groups. The therapeutic efficacy was assessed by contrast-enhanced imaging during follow-up. Hepatic and renal function were examined. The complete ablation, tumor volume shrinkage, and complication rates were analyzed.

Results

The ablation time and energy of the 3D group were lower than those of the 2D group (1152.0 ± 403.9 s vs. 1379.7 ± 375.8 s and 87,407.2.9 ± 50,387.0 J vs. 117,775.8 ± 46,245.6 J, P = 0.031 and 0.021, respectively). The 3D group had a higher complete ablation rate than the 2D group (97.7 ± 2.4% vs. 94.5 ± 3.7%, P < 0.001). The incidence of hemoglobinuria after ablation in the 3D group was lower than that in the 2D group (32.0% vs. 57.6%, P = 0.047). The levels of alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), and creatinine (Cre) after ablation in the 3D group were lower than those in the 2D group (126.7 ± 56.4 U/L vs. 210.9 ± 96.2 U/L, P < 0.001; 141.0 ± 60.8 U/L vs. 211.4 ± 90.0 U/L, P = 0.001; 57.3 ± 17.6 U/L vs. 80.8 ± 41.9 U/L, P = 0.010; and 66.6 ± 16.6 mmol/L vs. 84.5 ± 39.6 mmol/L, P = 0.037, respectively). There were no significant differences in antenna insertion and the volume reduction rate between the groups. One patient developed acute kidney injury shortly after ablation in the 2D group and recovered after hemodialysis. No other severe complications occurred during the follow-up period.

Conclusions

The 3D visualization operative planning system has a relatively high clinical application value in providing scientific, reasonable, quantifiable, and individualized therapy for LHHs by US-PMWA.

A Severe Complication of Myocardial Dysfunction Post Radiofrequency Ablation Treatment of Huge Hepatic Hemangioma: A Case Report and Literature Review

In recent years, radiofrequency (RF) ablation has been increasingly used for treating hepatic hemangiomas attributing to its unique advantages, such as minimal invasiveness, definite efficacy, high safety, fast recovery, and wide applicability. However, complications related to RF ablation had been frequently reported, especially while being used for treating huge hemangioma (≥10 cm). Cautious measures had been taken to prevent the incidence of ablation-induced complications, but still unexpected complications occurred. Herein we reported a case of severe myocardial dysfunction along with systemic inflammatory response syndrome occurring immediately post RF ablation of a 10.7 cm hemangioma. This serious complication was effectively managed by supportive care with the full recovery in a short period of time.

Safety and effective of laparoscopic microwave ablation for giant hepatic hemangioma: A retrospective cohort study

Introduction

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of laparoscopic microwave ablation (LMWA) as compared with conventional open resection (ORES) for the treatment of giant hepatic hemangioma.

Methods

and analysis: A retrospective chart review was conduct on patients with hepatic hemangioma underwent LMWA or ORES between 2014 and 2016.

Results

Of 131 patients, 37 patients underwent ORES and 94 patients underwent LMWA. Blood loss, operative time, postoperative hospital stay, hospital cost (RMB) were significantly different between two groups. Patients after LMWA experienced significantly less pain than those patients undergoing ORES. At a mean follow-up period of 12.8 ± 3.6 months in ORES group and 13.5 ± 2.5 months in LMWA group, no long-term complication was observed.

Conclusion

Compared with ORES, LMWA is a safe and effective minimally invasive for treating giant hepatic hemangioma.

•

Retrospectively analysed the clinical data of patients with hepatic haemangioma and investigated the efficacy of operation.

•

Technical aspects of laparoscopic microwave ablation for giant hepatic haemangioma were listed base on operation experience.

Risk factors for hemoglobinuria after ultrasonography-guided percutaneous microwave ablation for large hepatic cavernous hemangiomas

Thermal ablation of large hepatic cavernous hemangiomas may lead to intravascular hemolysis, hemoglobinuria, and even acute renal failure. This study aimed to identify the risk factors associated with hemoglobinuria after ultrasonography-guided percutaneous microwave ablation for large hepatic cavernous hemangiomas. In our study, 11 related risk factors were analyzed using univariate and multivariate binary logistic regression model and Receiver operating characteristic curves to determine the contribution to hemoglobinuria after microwave ablation for 49 patients with 51 hepatic cavernous hemangiomas. By multivariate analysis, the ablation time (p = 0.021; Odds Ratio, 1.005), and the number of antenna insertions (p = 0.036; Odds Ratio, 3.568) were the independent risk factors associated with hemoglobinuria. The cutoff value for ablation time and the number of antenna insertions in predicting the presence of hemoglobinuria was 1185s (sensitivity, 75%; specificity, 69%) and 4.5 (sensitivity, 55%; specificity, 83%), respectively. Less than 5 of antenna insertions and less than 20 mins of ablation time may therefore be recommended in patients with microwave ablation of large hepatic cavernous hemangiomas, in order to reduce the occurrence of hemoglobinuria. This is the first report about the risk factors analysis associated with hemoglobinuria after thermal ablation for large hepatic cavernous hemangiomas.

Surgical Management of Giant Hepatic Hemangioma: Single Center's Experience with 144 Patients

BACKGROUND

Hepatic hemangioma (HH) is the most common benign solid tumor of the liver. The aim of this study is to review our experiences of surgical treatment for giant HH and to show the impact of HH size and type of surgical resection on surgical outcomes.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This is a retrospective study of the cases who underwent surgery for giant HH during the period from January 2000 to April 2017.

RESULTS

Elective surgery was performed for 144 patients who had giant HH. The median diameter of resected HH was 10 cm (5-31 cm). Enucleation was performed for 92 (63.9%) patients and anatomical resection was required in 52 (36.1%) patients. No statistical difference between enucleation and resection as regards intraoperative and postoperative findings. The amount of intraoperative blood loss is significantly more in HH > 10 cm (300 vs. 575 ml, P = 0.007), the need of blood transfusion was significantly more in HH > 10 cm (P = 0.000), and the operation time was significantly longer in HH > 10 cm (120 vs. 180 min, P = 0.000). The size of HH had no significant effect as regards the development of postoperative complications.

CONCLUSION

Giant hemangioma can be treated surgically with low incidence of morbidity and mortality. No statistical difference between enucleation and resection as regards surgical outcomes. In left lobe HH, HH located deeper in posterior hepatic segments and in multiple HH, hepatic resection is preferred. The size of the HH had significant impact intraoperative blood loss and operative time.

Superselective Transarterial Chemoembolization as an Alternative to Surgery in Symptomatic/Enlarging Liver Hemangiomas

BACKGROUND

Transarterial embolization of liver hemangiomas has not been considered to be consistently effective.

METHODS

The charts of 25 patients who underwent superselective transarterial chemoembolization with the bleomycin-lipiodol emulsion were evaluated retrospectively.

RESULTS

Twenty-two patients had abdominal pain; asymptomatic/vaguely symptomatic enlargement was the treatment indication in three patients. A single session was conducted in 17 patients, two sessions in 7 and three sessions in one. After the first session, lesion volume decreased by median (range) 51% (10-92%) from median (range) 634 (226-8435) to 372(28-4710) cm³ (p < 0.01), after a median period of 4 months (range 2-8). A second session was performed in eight patients (median (range) initial volume 1276 (441-8435) cm³) with persistent complaints and/or large lesions receiving feeders from both right and left hepatic arteries (staged treatment). Median (range) lesion size decreased further from 806 (245-4710) to 464 (159-2150) cm³ (p < 0.01). Three patients experienced a postembolization syndrome that persisted after the first week. Seventeen of the 22 symptomatic patients (77%) reported resolution or marked amelioration of complaints. Regrowth after initial regression was not observed during median (range) 14 (8-39) months of follow-up (n:18).

CONCLUSION

Transarterial chemoembolization with the bleomycin-lipiodol emulsion is a potential alternative to surgery for symptomatic/enlarging liver hemangiomas. Volume reduction is universal, and symptom control is satisfactory. Centrally located and very large (>1000 cm³) lesions may require two sessions.

Safety and Efficacy of Laparoscopic Radiofrequency Ablation for Hepatic Hemangiomas: A Multicenter Retrospective Study

INTRODUCTION

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is an effective and minimally invasive technique for the management of hepatic hemangiomas (HHs). This study aims to assess the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic RFA for HHs.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Forty-four patients with 50 hepatic hemangiomas (5-10 cm in diameter) undergoing laparoscopic RFA from January 2012 to May 2015 at three tertiary hospitals in China were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

Thirty-three patients with subcapsular hemangiomas were treated with a laparoscopic approach, and 11 patients with lesions in the liver parenchyma were treated with a combined laparoscopy and an ultrasound-guided percutaneous approach. No conversion to open surgery or two-step surgery occurred during the study period. Patients with small hemangiomas (&lt; 7 cm) required a significantly shorter operating time (71.1 ± 20.18 min vs. 106 ± 23.55 min, p = 0.000) and fewer punctures compared with patients with large hemangiomas (&gt; 7 cm) (4.61 ± 1.09 vs. 6.73 ±1.01, P &lt; 0.05). According to the Dindo-Clavien classification, 15 patients experienced 34 Grade 1 complications, and two had complications of Grade 3a. All complications were resolved by conservative treatment. Forty-three (86.0%) HHs in 38 patients were completely ablated after RFA, and 7 (14.0%) HHs in 6 patients were incompletely ablated. All patients were followed up for 6-24 months (mean 15 ± 6 months).

CONCLUSION

The data showed that laparoscopic RFA is an effective treatment for small (&lt; 10 cm) HHs. While the incidence of postoperative complications remains high, the majority of complications are minor. Patients undergoing laparoscopic RFA for HHs, even for the small ones, should be carefully selected.

Radiofrequency ablation for hepatic hemangiomas: A consensus from a Chinese panel of experts

Recent studies have shown that radiofrequency (RF) ablation therapy is a safe, feasible, and effective procedure for hepatic hemangiomas, even huge hepatic hemangiomas. RF ablation has the following advantages in the treatment of hepatic hemangiomas: minimal invasiveness, definite efficacy, high safety, fast recovery, relatively simple operation, and wide applicability. It is necessary to formulate a widely accepted consensus among the experts in China who have extensive expertise and experience in the treatment of hepatic hemangiomas using RF ablation, which is important to standardize the application of RF ablation for the management of hepatic hemangiomas, regarding the selection of patients with suitable indications to receive RF ablation treatment, the technical details of the techniques, therapeutic effect evaluations, management of complications, etc. A final consensus by a Chinese panel of experts who have the expertise of using RF ablation to treat hepatic hemangiomas was reached by means of literature review, comprehensive discussion, and draft approval.