The social-psychiatric service and its role in compulsory hospitalization

Mental health law: a comparison of compulsory hospital admission in Italy and the UK

In Europe, the mental health law legal framework has had several changes throughout the years to achieve and develop new reforms, better mental health care, and protect the human rights of patients. The UK national data shows rising detention rates and the disproportionate use of the legal framework among people from black and minority ethnic groups. At the national level, compulsory admissions are lower in Italy; it also shows that it has increased in the last few years in both countries. The lack of ethnic national data, especially in Italy, limited the ability to understand compulsory admission, discrimination, and stigma in mental health. The present study aims to compare the legal framework of mental health law and compulsory hospital admission in Italy and the UK. A review of each country's latest amendments to mental health law and the number of compulsory hospital admissions was conducted to understand the impact of changes in mental health care.

[Documentation, Application and Efforts to Reduce Involuntary Admissions and Coercive Measures - Results from a Nationwide Study on Acute Psychiatric Hospitals in Germany]

OBJECTIVE

This nationwide full census survey investigated the documentation status regarding involuntary admissions and coercive measures in psychiatric hospitals in Germany.

METHODS

As part of the ZIPHER study, a questionnaire survey on the documentation, application and reduction of coercion was conducted (N = 147, response rate = 34.4 %).

RESULTS

The majority of participating hospitals reported a comprehensive documentation of the use of coercion. However, substantial regional differences could be found in this regard as well as for the use of guidelines. The involuntary admission quote was M = 13.4 % (± 10.9). Of those, 33.9 % (± 22.2) were affected by mechanical restraint, 8.9 % (± 17.2) by seclusion, and 11.8 % (± 18.0) by compulsory medication.

CONCLUSION

The regional differences plead for a unification of legal bases and applied practice as well as for a merge of respective data on a nationwide level of the relevant stakeholders.

Use of Compulsory Treatment by Early-Career Psychiatrists: An International Survey

OBJECTIVE

The United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (UN CRPD) has been broadly incorporated into national frameworks for compulsory psychiatric treatment. Recently, instructions issued by the UN CRPD Committee discouraged any involuntary treatment and detention of people with mental disabilities, which has sparked clinical, legal, and ethical debates. Early-career psychiatrists (ECPs) are often at the front line of decisions to involuntarily detain psychiatric patients; here, the authors surveyed ECPs to gain insight into their experiences with compulsory psychiatric treatment in clinical practice.

METHODS

An anonymous, voluntary, online survey among ECPs from 43 countries was conducted between July and August 2019.

RESULTS

In total, 142 ECPs completed and were eligible to participate in the survey. Most of the survey respondents reported being involved in the practice of compulsory psychiatric care. More than half reported difficulties in providing compulsory psychiatric care, mostly because of the bureaucracy of legal procedures (e.g., legal correspondence with the court) and ethical issues around detention. Most respondents (96%) generally agreed with their country's legal mechanism for compulsory treatment; 43% indicated that it should remain unchanged, and 53% indicated that it should be revised.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings call for a broader discussion in society and among psychiatrists regarding the practice of compulsory treatment while giving due consideration to the legal, therapeutic, and ethical issues involved. The views of ECPs will be helpful in future revisions of the ethical and operational frameworks of compulsory psychiatric care.

Impacts on and Care of Psychiatric Patients during the Outbreak of COVID-19

The outbreak of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) in December 2019 has led to massive lifestyle, economic, and health changes. The COVID-19 pandemic has had broad impacts on psychiatric patients, exacerbating symptoms such as psychosis, depression, and suicidal ideation. Therefore, we aimed to review the psychological impacts of COVID-19 on psychiatric patients and mental healthcare staff and provide practical guidance for medical staff and authorities.

The main findings of this review included the impacts of COVID-19 on psychiatric patients and mental health professionals as well as the transformation of mental health care. Greater consideration should be given to the care of patients with psychosis and depression because of their lack of self-care ability, neurocognitive impairment, and impaired immune function. Depressive symptoms can be exacerbated due to several factors, such as economic crises, social isolation, and limited physical activity. Unemployment and financial problems can lead to an increased suicide rate. Consequently, mental healthcare workers’ workload can increase, which could lead to burnout and psychological symptoms such as insomnia, depression, and anxiety.

A transformation of psychiatric care is needed during the time of the pandemic. While emergency care should be maintained, outpatient care should be limited to decrease viral spread. Shifting care to telemedicine and community-based psychiatry can be helpful. Inpatient services should be adapted by tightening admission criteria, shortening the length of hospital stays, suspending some group activities, limiting visitors, and preparing for quarantine if necessary. Mental healthcare workers can be supported with telecommunication, appropriate work shifts, alternative accommodations, and good communication between the team leader and staff.