Prognostic importance of vascular endothelial growth factor-A expression and vascular endothelial growth factor polymorphisms in epithelial ovarian cancer

Cytokines as Prognostic Biomarkers of Epithelial Ovarian Cancer (EOC): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVES

The value of cytokines as epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) prognostic factors has been widely investigated. This study aimed to determine the role of single cytokine as a biomarker prognosis in EOC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting cytokine as the prognostic predictor in EOC based on PRISMA guideline. We included English articles investigating associations of preoperative cytokines level in tissue, blood or ascites with overall survival (OS) or disease-free survival (DFS) from PUBMED and EBSCO. Summary hazard ratios (HRs) and confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated.

RESULTS

Fifty studies investigating twenty types of cytokines in tumor tissue, serum, and ascites from 5,376 patients were included. Pre-operative high VEGF level was associated with poor OS (HR 2.28, 95%CI [1.28, 3.28]) and DFS (HR 2.13, 95%CI [1.63, 2.78]) in serum and OS (HR 1.80, 95%CI [1.45, 2.23]) in tissue. IL-6 level in blood was associated with DFS (HR 1.60, 95%CI [1.21, 2.11]). There was no single cytokine which investigated by at least 2 studies reporting hazard ratio in ascites, so we did not conduct the meta-analysis. Other cytokines (serum IL-8; ascites fluid IL-8, IL-10, IFN-γ, TNF-α; and ovarian tissue TGF-α, CSF-1, IL-10 ,TGF-β1, IL-17) associated with the poorer prognosis, could not be pooled due to lack of studies.

CONCLUSION

Pre-operative VEGF level in serum and tissue specimen seem to be the potential candidate of an unfavorable prognostic biomarker for EOC. The evidence was lacking to support the other cytokines investigated in blood, tissue and ascites as prognostic biomarkers for EOC.

Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) Polymorphisms and Serum VEGF Levels in Women With Epithelial Ovarian Cancer, Benign Tumors, and Healthy Ovaries

OBJECTIVE

This study analyzed the relation of 5 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the VEGF (vascular endothelial growth factor) gene in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), compared with patients carrying benign tumors or healthy ovaries. We studied serum VEGF levels and the relation with SNPs and association between VEGF SNPs and haplotypes with progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with cancer.

METHODS

The genotyping of VEGF gene polymorphisms (-2578 C/A, -1154 G/A, -460 T/C, +405 G/C, +936 C/T) was performed in DNA isolated from blood samples of 100 women. The different genotypes were evaluated by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction. Vascular endothelial growth factor protein concentration was assessed in serum using solid-phase sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.

RESULTS

We found statistically significant differences in the distribution of VEGF genotypes among the 3 groups of patients: -2578 C/A between those with EOC and healthy ovary (P = 0.04), -460 T/C between those with EOC and healthy ovary (P = 0.03), and -460 T/C between those with benign tumors and healthy ovary (P = 0.02). Vascular endothelial growth factor serum levels were analyzed in patients with EOC. Higher levels were found in patients with clear cell carcinoma compared with those with serous, mucinous, or endometrioid tumors (P < 0.05). No clear association was observed between VEGF SNPs and serum VEGF levels. There was no significant correlation between VEGF SNPs and PFS. In haplotype analysis, CGTCT and CGTGT showed worse prognosis without reaching the statistical significance. CGCGC and AGTGC haplotypes had statistically significant differences among patients with EOC, benign tumors, and healthy ovaries (Ps = 0.046 and 0.041, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The distribution of VEGF genotypes was different in patients with EOC, compared with those with benign tumors or women with healthy ovaries. Vascular endothelial growth factor serum levels were higher in patients with clear cell carcinoma. No correlation was found with improved PFS, but CGTCT and CGTGT haplotypes showed worse prognosis.

Genetic variants as ovarian cancer first-line treatment hallmarks: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The potential predictive value of genetic polymorphisms in ovarian cancer first-line treatment is inconsistently reported. We aimed to review ovarian cancer pharmacogenetic studies to update and summarize the available data and to provide directions for further research.

METHODS

A systematic review followed by a meta-analysis was conducted on cohort studies assessing the involvement of genetic polymorphisms in ovarian cancer first-line treatment response retrieved through a MEDLINE database search by November 2016. Studies were pooled and summary estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using random or fixed-effects models as appropriate.

RESULTS

One hundred and forty-two studies gathering 106871 patients were included. Combined data suggested that GSTM1-null genotype patients have a lower risk of death compared to GSTM1-wt carriers, specifically in advanced stages (hazard ratio (HR), 0.68; 95% CI, 0.48-0.97) and when submitted to platinum-based chemotherapy (aHR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.39-0.94). ERCC1 rs11615 and rs3212886 might have also a significant impact in treatment outcome (aHR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.51-0.89; aHR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.01-1.63, respectively). Moreover, ERCC2 rs13181 and rs1799793 showed a distinct ethnic behavior (Asians: aHR, 1.41; 95% CI, 0.80-2.49; aHR, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.62-1.86; Caucasians: aHR, 0.10; 95% CI, 0.01-0.96; aHR, 0.18; 95% CI, 0.05-0.68, respectively).

CONCLUSION(S)

The definition of integrative predictive models should encompass genetic information, especially regarding GSTM1 homozygous deletion. Justifying additional pharmacogenetic investigation are variants in ERCC1 and ERCC2, which highlight the DNA Repair ability to ovarian cancer prognosis. Further knowledge could aid to understand platinum-treatment failure and to tailor chemotherapy strategies.

Vascular endothelial growth factor expression correlates with serum CA125 and represents a useful tool in prediction of refractoriness to platinum-based chemotherapy and ascites formation in epithelial ovarian cancer

There is an increasing need for the identification of novel biological markers and potential therapeutic targets in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). Given the critical role of growth factors in the biology of EOC, we aimed in the present study to evaluate the intratumoral expressions of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and fibroblast growth factor (FGF) proteins and their clinical relevance in a cohort of 100 patients with EOC. All patients received platinum-based chemotherapy after surgery. A comparative immunohistochemical study of normal ovarian and EOC tissues showed that both growth factors were expressed at higher levels in tumor samples. In our statistical analysis, while no association existed between the FGF expression status and the clinicopathological characteristics of patients, intratumoral VEGF was identified as a potential biomarker for the prediction of ascites formation. In addition, the expression status of VEGF appeared to independently predict overall survival and response to chemotherapy. Furthermore, a direct association was demonstrated between the pre-treatment VEGF expression and serum CA125 after three cycles of chemotherapy. In sum, we report for the first time to our knowledge the correlation between intratumoral VEGF and serum CA125 in EOC. Our data also shows the prognostic value of VEGF expression in EOC. These results suggest the potential value of intratumoral VEGF in patient stratification. Dual inhibition of VEGF and CA125 might bring about a better outcome for patients with EOC.

The associations between serum VEGF, bFGF and endoglin levels with microvessel density and expression of proangiogenic factors in malignant and benign ovarian tumors

AIM OF THE STUDY

To investigate whether serum levels of VEGF, bFGF and endoglin correlate with tumor VEGF and bFGF expression or microvessel density (MVD) in ovarian cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Forty five patients with epithelial ovarian cancers (EOCs) and 38 patients with benign ovarian tumors (BOTs) were included into the study. Serum levels of VEGF, bFGF and endoglin were assessed using ELISA. The expression of VEGF and bFGF in tumor samples were evaluated using ELISA of supernatants obtained from tumor homogenization. MVD was analyzed using immunohistochemistry with antibodies against CD31, CD34 and CD105.

RESULTS

Serum VEGF levels were significantly higher in EOCs than in BOTs (436.6pg/ml [19.67-2860] vs 295.5pg/ml [123-539], P=0.025). Serum endoglin levels were lowered in the group EOCs when compared to BOTs (33,720g/ml [12,220-73,940] vs 42,390pg/ml [19,380-56,910], P=0.015). There were no differences in bFGF levels between studied groups. EOCs have significantly higher CD105 MVD (25 vessels/mm2 [0-57] vs 6 vessels/mm2 [0-70], P<0.001) and tumor VEGF (405.9pg/mg protein [0-3000] vs 2.225 [0-634.7], P<0.001) expression than BOTs, while, bFGF expression was higher in BOTs than in EOCs (2076pg/mg protein [668.1-8718] vs 847.3pg/mg protein [188.9-8333], P=0.003). In patients with EOCs we have observed negative correlation between serum VEGF concentration and its tissue expression (r Spearman=-0.571, P=0.0261), and serum VEGF concentration correlated positively with CD34-MVD (r Spearman=0.545, P=0.0289). In a multiple regression analysis we have observed only the negative correlation between serum VEGF and CD105-MVD (r=-0.5288, P=0.0427).

CONCLUSIONS

Serum VEGF is a useful marker for prediction of ovarian cancer MVD and tumor VEGF expression.

Investigating impact of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Polymorphisms in Epithelial Ovarian Cancers: A Study in the Indian Population

Epithelial ovarian cancer is one of the increasingly incident malignancies that is notorious because of its evasiveness for early diagnosis and high mortality rates. Epithelial ovarian cancers are highly dependent on pathologic vasculature and Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor is known to be one of the most efficient angiogenic factors. Polymorphisms of the VEGF gene, in this study, were assessed for association with the malignancy and other clinico-pathological factors. 300 case samples and 320 age and mensus status matched controls were inculcated into the study. rs699947, rs833061, rs1570360, rs2010963, rs1413711 and rs3025039 were the six single nucleotide polymorphisms that were scrutinized. Genotyping was carried out by polymerase chain reaction and restriction fragment length polymorphism. rs 3025039 showed immense promise as a marker for disease aggression and recurrence and a factor for poor prognosis. rs699947 showed least association with the disease and clinico-pathologic factors studied. rs833061, rs 1570360 showed significant association with some clinico-pathological factors such as bilateral affliction of ovaries and post operative CA-125 levels. rs2010963 associated with presence of ascites in higher volumes. The SNPs under consideration showed no formidable linkage in our study samples. A haplotype analysis (excluding rs699947 and rs1413711) revealed 5 frontrunners being present in >85% of the population with TGGC and CGCC associating significantly as protective and risk factors respectively. These haplotypes showed a dose dependent additive effect of their seeming functionality. This study is unique and a first of its kind carried out in the Indian population of South-east Asia.

A vascular endothelial growth factor gene polymorphism predicts malignant potential in intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical relevance of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs).

METHODS

A total of 169 IPMN and 108 pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patients who underwent curative resection were enrolled, and VEGF +405G/C and -460C/T SNPs were investigated.

RESULTS

Vascular endothelial growth factor +405C/C was found more frequently in malignant IPMNs compared with +405G/G (odds ratio [OR], 2.7; P = 0.04), and +405C allele was associated with malignant IPMNs compared with +405G (P = 0.055). In branch duct IPMNs, VEGF +405C/C was significantly associated with malignant transformation (CC vs GG: OR, 4.0; P = 0.03; CC vs CG + GG: OR, 3.3; P = 0.04), and there was a trend of VEGF +405C/C associated with malignant transformation of gastric-type IPMNs (CC vs GG: OR, 3.0; P = 0.07). When the survival outcomes were analyzed based on VEGF +405G/C SNPs, however, there was no relationship between VEGF SNPs and overall survival in patients with both IPMNs and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas.

CONCLUSIONS

Vascular endothelial growth factor +405G/C SNP was significantly associated with malignant transformation in IPMNs, especially branch duct and gastric-type IPMNs. Vascular endothelial growth factor +405G/C SNP might be helpful in predicting clinical course in pancreatic disease with potential for malignant transformation.

VEGF pathway polymorphisms as prognostic and pharmacogenetic factors in cancer: a 2013 update

With the recent advances in genomic medicine and the development of targeted antiangiogenic therapy for cancer patients, there has been an increased interest in the role of predictive and prognostic markers for antiangiogenic therapy. Here, we provide a summary of the angiogenesis pathway, the role of predictive and prognostic markers in cancer and a summary of the current literature and studies on predictive and prognostic markers for antiangiogenic therapy. Our aim is to summarize those studies that are currently in the literature with an emphasis on the future directions of the field from 2013 and beyond. We conclude by providing our perspective on the future directions of this growing field, as well as possible challenges and pitfalls along the way.

Risk factors for GI adverse events in a phase III randomized trial of bevacizumab in first-line therapy of advanced ovarian cancer: A Gynecologic Oncology Group Study

PURPOSE

To evaluate risk factors for GI adverse events (AEs) within a phase III trial of bevacizumab in first-line ovarian cancer therapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Women with previously untreated advanced disease after surgery were randomly allocated to six cycles of platinum-taxane chemotherapy plus placebo cycles (C)2 to C22 (R1); chemotherapy plus bevacizumab C2 to C6 plus placebo C7 to C22 (R2); or chemotherapy plus bevacizumab C2 to C22 (R3). Patients were evaluated for history or on-study development of potential risk factors for GI AEs defined as grade ≥ 2 perforation, fistula, necrosis, or hemorrhage.

RESULTS

Of 1,873 patients enrolled, 1,759 (94%) were evaluable, and 2.8% (50 of 1,759) experienced a GI AE: 10 of 587 (1.7%, R1), 20 of 587 (3.4%, R2), and 20 of 585 (3.4%, R3). Univariable analyses indicated that previous treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD; P = .005) and small bowel resection (SBR; P = .032) or large bowel resection (LBR; P = .012) at primary surgery were significantly associated with a GI AE. The multivariable estimated relative odds of a GI AE were 13.4 (95% CI, 3.44 to 52.3; P < .001) for IBD; 2.05 (95% CI, 1.09 to 3.88; P = .026) for LBR; 1.95 (95% CI, 0.894 to 4.25; P = .093) for SBR; and 2.15 for bevacizumab exposure (aggregated 95% CI, 1.05 to 4.40; P = .036).

CONCLUSION

History of treatment for IBD, and bowel resection at primary surgery, increase the odds of GI AEs in patients receiving first-line platinum-taxane chemotherapy for advanced ovarian cancer. After accounting for these risk factors, concurrent bevacizumab doubles the odds of a GI AE, but is not appreciably increased by continuation beyond chemotherapy.

Correlation of the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor and its receptors with microvessel density in ovarian cancer

The present study aimed to investigate the correlation between the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and its receptors, the Flt-1 and KDR proteins, with clinical pathology and microvessel density (MVD) in ovarian cancer tissue. The protein expression levels of VEGF and its receptors, Flt-1 and KDR/Flk-1, were detected in 48 cases of ovarian cancer using the streptavidin-biotin complex (SABC) immunohistochemical method, and tumor MVD was evaluated using F8 factor (FVIII-RA). The expression of the VEGF, Flt-1 and KDR proteins was not significantly associated with the pathological type, extent of differentiation or clinical stage of ovarian cancer. However, the co-expression of VEGF and Flt-1 was markedly correlated with differentiation and clinical stage (P<0.01). The co-expression levels of VEGF and receptor Flt-1 in malignant neoplasms with lymph node metastasis was significantly higher compared with malignant neoplasms without lymph node metastasis (P<0.05). The expression level of KDR in patients with hepatic metastasis was significantly higher compared with patients without hepatic metastasis (P<0.05). The co-expression level of VEGF and KDR in patients with hepatic metastasis was significantly higher compared with patients without hepatic metastasis (P<0.05) and the Flt-1 expression level in patients with ascites <1,000 ml was significantly lower than that in patients with ascites ≥1000 ml (P<0.05). The mean MVD of VEGF- and KDR-positive patients was significantly higher compared with VEGF- and KDR-negative patients (P<0.05). The expression of VEGF and its receptors is involved in the malignant transformation of ovarian tumors, tumor progression and metastasis, as well as ascites formation and angiogenesis.

Monoclonal antibodies therapies for ovarian cancer

INTRODUCTION

Despite aggressive debulking surgery, intraperitoneal therapies and the use of new drugs for chemotherapy, patients with ovarian cancer (OC) still have poor prognosis and, therefore, new strategies for its management are needed. Molecular-targeted agents can be considered a new option in drug research. Several antigens related to OC have been isolated and they could be potential target of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs); therefore, different mAbs have been developed and are emerging as new potential OC treatments.

AREAS COVERED

This article aims to review the literature on the use of mAbs in the treatment of OC. The purposes of this manuscript are to offer a brief explanation of the mechanisms of action of mAbs and to help readers in understanding the current role of mAbs in the treatment of OC.

EXPERT OPINION

A deeper knowledge of the molecular biology of OC has brought new developments in targeted therapies. Among these therapies, bevacizumab demonstrated the higher clinical efficacy. Further larger trials are needed to better define the role of the other mAbs in OC treatment. There is a strong need to identify and validate robust biomarkers for a more focused patient selection and for tailoring therapies, optimizing dose and assessing response.

Prognostic importance of VEGF-A haplotype combinations in a stage II colon cancer population

AIM

To investigate the prognostic effect of three VEGF-A SNPs, -2578, -460 and 405, as well as the corresponding haplotype combinations, in a unique population of stage II colon cancer patients.

PATIENTS & METHODS

The study included all patients diagnosed with stage II colon cancer in Denmark in 2003 (698 patients). One paraffin-embedded tissue block from each patient was used for DNA extraction and analysis of the three VEGF SNPs.

RESULTS

The homozygous genotype VEGF -2578 AA had significant effect on time to tumor recurrence (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.01 [95% CI: 1.13-3.56]; p = 0.02) as well as -460TT (HR = 0.50 [95% CI: 0.29-0.89]; p = 0.02). Patients harboring the haplotype combinations ACG,CTC and ACG,ACG displayed a significantly shorter time to tumor recurrence in both univariate (HR = 1.87 [95% CI: 1.21-2.89]; p = 0.008) and multivariate analysis (HR = 1.76 [95% CI: 1.09-2.82]; p = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

We found that the gene polymorphism in VEGF-A holds prognostic information and should be considered as a potential adjunct in identification of high-risk stage II colon cancer patients.

Bevacizumab in the treatment of ovarian cancer

INTRODUCTION

In the past decade there have been many attempts to improve systemic treatment and thus the outcome of patients with ovarian cancer. However, neither the sequential addition of non cross-resistant drugs to standard chemotherapy comprising carboplatin and paclitaxel, nor triplet combination therapies with conventional chemotherapeutic drugs have improved outcomes. Instead, such approaches have led to an increase in the incidence of side effects. We are currently experiencing a shift toward the addition of molecularly targeted and biological anticancer therapies to standard treatment. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), which improves vitally important tumor vasculature, is secreted by a range of tumors, and a high level of VEGF is known to be an independent risk factor for aggressive disease in ovarian cancer. This finding led to the development in the 1990s of bevacizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody against VEGF.

DISCUSSION

Several phase II trials and four phase III trials have demonstrated that bevacizumab is active in patients with advanced and recurrent ovarian cancer. Both phase III trials of bevacizumab as first-line therapy in advanced ovarian cancer (ICON 7/AGOOVAR 11 and GOG-0218) have shown that the addition of bevacizumab to chemotherapy and as maintenance therapy improves progressionfree survival (PFS). The phase III trials in platinum-sensitive (OCEANS) and platinumresistant, relapsed disease (AURELIA) have also demonstrated a benefit for bevazicumab with respect to PFS. The administration of bevacizumab to improve survival in patients with ovarian cancer is not without side effects and a broad discussion on the cost-effectiveness of this approach is ongoing.

CONCLUSION

This article presents clinical trial data on bevacizumab in the treatment of ovarian cancer and discusses the indication and pitfalls in the application of bevacizumab in patients with this malignancy.

Vascular endothelial growth factor pathway polymorphisms as prognostic and pharmacogenetic factors in cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Angiogenesis is an important host process that interacts with cancer cells to promote growth, invasion, and metastasis. Numerous therapeutic agents targeting the VEGF pathway have been developed. Host variability in VEGF pathway can influence angiogenesis-dependent signaling, altering sensitivity to antiangiogenic drugs and prognosis. A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted (May 1990-July 2011). Eligible studies involved cancer patients and compared polymorphisms in the VEGF pathway [VEGF and molecules directly interacting with VEGF: KDR, FLT1, FGF, FGF2, FGFR, NRP1, endostatin (encoded by COL18A1)], and reported one of the following outcomes: overall survival, progression-free survival, time to recurrence, disease-free survival, response rate, or drug toxicity. We identified 48 cancer studies assessing prognosis and 12 cancer studies exploring pharmacogenetics of anti-VEGF therapy across various VEGF pathway polymorphisms. There was marked inter- and intradisease site heterogeneity in the effect of polymorphisms on both outcome and response to therapy. Meta-analyses of 5 VEGF polymorphisms (+936C>T, -460T>C, +405G>C, -1154G>A, and -2578C>A) identified a significant prognostic relationship: VEGF +405G>C variants showed a highly statistically significant improvement in overall survival [HR, 0.74; 95% confidence interval, 0.60-0.91; P = 0.004]. Variants (heterozygotes and/or homozygotes) of VEGF +405G>C were significantly associated with improved survival in a meta-analysis of multiple cancer sites.

Role of common genetic variants in ovarian cancer susceptibility and outcome: progress to date from the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium (OCAC)

In this article, we review the current knowledge of the inherited genetics of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) susceptibility and clinical outcome. We focus on recent developments in identifying low-penetrance susceptibility genes and the role of the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium (OCAC) in these discoveries. The OCAC was established to facilitate large-scale replication analyses for reported genetic associations for EOC. Since its inception, the OCAC has conducted both candidate gene and genome-wide association studies (GWAS); the latter has identified six established loci for EOC susceptibility, most of which showed stronger association with the serous histological subtype. Future GWAS and sequencing studies are likely to result in the discovery of additional susceptibility loci and may result in established associations with clinical outcome. Additional rare and uncommon ovarian cancer loci will likely be uncovered from high-throughput next-generation sequencing studies. Applying these novel findings to establish improved preventative and clinical intervention strategies will be one of the major challenges of future work.

Antiangiogenic agents should be integrated into the standard treatment for patients with ovarian cancer

Tumor angiogenesis is a fundamental process driving the progression of epithelial ovarian cancer and related malignancies. The question is whether agents targeting tumor angiogenesis should at this time be integrated into standard treatment. In this article, the pro side of this question is presented. Multiple phase II trials have demonstrated efficacy for antiangiogenic agents in the treatment of women with recurrent ovarian cancer. Results of three phase III trials evaluating the antivascular endothelial growth factor antibody bevacizumab have been presented, all demonstrating significant increases in progression-free survival when combined with standard cytotoxic chemotherapy and continued beyond chemotherapy, with acceptable toxicity. Several other angiogenesis-targeted agents are undergoing phase III evaluation. Based on these data, it is concluded that antiangiogenic therapy, at least with bevacizumab, should be integrated into the standard clinical management of patients with this disease. Further investigation is needed to determine optimal utilization.

Genetic polymorphisms as predictive and prognostic biomarkers in gynecological cancers: a systematic review

PURPOSE

Numerous studies have explored the potential role of genetic polymorphisms as predictive or prognostic biomarkers in gynecologic malignancies. A systematic review for all eligible polymorphisms has not yet been reported. The aim of this study was to summarize the current status of the field and provide direction for future research.

DESIGN

We searched literature databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane) from 2006 to April 2011 to identify studies evaluating the association between gene polymorphisms and clinical outcome in ovarian, endometrial, cervical, or vulvar cancer. The main outcome measures were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Studies reporting relationships between polymorphisms and toxicity were also included.

RESULTS

Sixty two studies met the inclusion criteria. The median sample size was 140. Most of the included studies (n=50, 81%) were conducted in ovarian cancer patients. Almost a third assessed potential predictive associations between gene polymorphism and outcome in ovarian cancer. The most commonly evaluated genes were ERCC1, VEGF, ABCB1 (MDR), and GSTP1. Most studies (n=44, 71%) were observational case-series. Only four studies (6%) included a validation arm and patient population ethnicity was explicitly stated only in 27% of included studies.

CONCLUSION

No consistent association between any gene polymorphism and clinical outcome in gynecological cancers has been found across studies. There is incomplete adherence to the REMARK guidelines and inadequate methodology reporting in most studies. Moving forward, analysis of large trial-based clinical samples; adherence to the highest methodological standards, and focus on validation analyses are necessary to identify clinically useful pharmacogenomic biomarkers of outcome.

'Triple negative' epithelial ovarian cancer and pathologic markers for prognosis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To summarize the recent evidence for 'triple negative' epithelial ovarian cancer (TNEOC), characterized by lack of expression of estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor and human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 (HER2), and to discuss its potential pathologic markers for prognosis and targeted therapy.

RECENT FINDINGS

'Triple negative' phenotype is traditionally referred to as a specific subtype of breast cancer negative for estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor and HER2 expression. Recent studies have shown that such 'triple negative' phenotype also exists in ovarian and endometrial cancer. TNEOC accounts for about 15% of epithelial ovarian carcinoma. This specific subtype tends to exhibit more aggressive characteristics and a worse prognosis. The molecular features of TNEOC are similar to those of 'triple negative' breast cancer (TNBC), a widely studied histological subtype. Recently, a panel of specific pathologic biomarkers has been identified in TNBC. Currently, phase I and phase II trials to examine the safety and efficacy of a poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor (olaparib) and angiogenesis inhibitors (sunitinib and bevacizumab) in TNBC are ongoing. These TNBC-associated pathologic markers could be used to screen for novel prognostic factors and therapeutic targets in TNEOC.

SUMMARY

'Triple negative' phenotype has important implications for clinical management of patients with ovarian cancer.

Overexpression of tumor vascular endothelial growth factor A may portend an increased likelihood of progression in a phase II trial of bevacizumab and erlotinib in resistant ovarian cancer

PURPOSE

This phase II trial evaluated bevacizumab plus erlotinib in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer; exploratory biomarker analyses, including that of tumor vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF-A), were also done.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Forty heavily pretreated patients received erlotinib (150 mg/d orally) and bevacizumab (10 mg/kg i.v.) every 2 weeks until disease progression. Primary end points were objective response rate and response duration; secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS), toxicity, and correlations between angiogenic protein levels, toxicity, and efficacy.

RESULTS

Grade 3 toxicities included skin rash (n = 6), diarrhea (n = 5), fatigue (n = 4), and hypertension (n = 3). Grade 4 toxicities were myocardial infarction (n = 1) and nasal septal perforation (n = 1). Only one grade 3 fistula and one grade 2 bowel perforation were observed. Nine (23.1%) of 39 evaluable patients had a response (median duration, 36.1+ weeks; one complete response), and 10 (25.6%) patients achieved stable disease, for a disease control rate of 49%. Median PFS was 4 months, and 6-month PFS was 30.8%. Biomarker analyses identified an association between tumor cell VEGF-A expression and progression (P = 0.03); for every 100-unit increase in the VEGF-A score, there was a 3.7-fold increase in the odds of progression (95% confidence interval, 1.1-16.6).

CONCLUSIONS

Bevacizumab plus erlotinib in heavily pretreated ovarian cancer patients was clinically active and well tolerated. Erlotinib did not seem to contribute to efficacy. Our study raises the intriguing possibility that high levels of tumor cell VEGF-A, capable of both autocrine and paracrine interactions, are associated with resistance to bevacizumab, emphasizing the complexity of the tumor microenvironment.

Vascular endothelial growth factor polymorphisms: role in response and toxicity of tyrosine kinase inhibitors

Angiogenesis is central to the growth of normal tissues and tumors. Inhibiting this pathway has been a strategy for drug development for tumors not responsive to most agents used in chemotherapy. Notably, signaling mediated by vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is a key target because aberrant signaling via this pathway is frequently associated with neoangiogenesis in tumors. The drug-discovery effort to blunt VEGF signaling has led to the approval of bevacizumab and several receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) that have shown efficacy in the clinical management of breast, colorectal, lung, and kidney cancer. Understanding the genetic variability in VEGF and VEGF receptor has led to identifying genotypic variations (single nucleotide polymorphisms [SNPs]) associated with treatment outcome and toxicity. Notably, identification of SNPs in VEGF associated with angiogenesis inhibitor treatment-induced hypertension and outcome provides exciting opportunities for personalized medicine to improve outcome and reduced toxicity with these novel TKIs.

The prognostic value of haplotypes in the vascular endothelial growth factor a gene in colorectal cancer

New prognostic markers in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) are a prerequisite for individualized treatment. Prognostic importance of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF-A) gene has been proposed. The objective of the present study was to investigate the prognostic importance of haplotypes in the VEGF-A gene in patients with CRC. The study included 486 patients surgically resected for stage II and III CRC, divided into two independent cohorts. Three SNPs in the VEGF-A gene were analyzed by polymerase chain reaction. Haplotypes were estimated using the PHASE program. The prognostic influence was evaluated using Kaplan-Meir plots and log rank tests. Cox regression method was used to analyze the independent prognostic importance of different markers. All three SNPs were significantly related to survival. A haplotype combination, responsible for this effect, was present in approximately 30% of the patients and demonstrated a significant relationship with poor survival, and it remained an independent prognostic marker after multivariate analysis, hazard ratio 2.46 (95% confidence interval 1.49–4.06), p < 0.001. Validation was provided by consistent findings in a second and independent cohort. Haplotype combinations call for further investigation.

Mechanisms of resistance to antiangiogenesis therapy

Angiogenesis, the formation of new blood vessels from existing vasculature, plays an essential role in tumour growth, invasion and metastasis. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is one of the key factors responsible for its regulation. High expression of VEGF has been observed in many cancers, and is associated with worse survival. When antiangiogenic agents are used alone they typically initially cause reduction in blood flow or vascular permeability, in many types of cancer. In some cases tumour regression occurs, mainly in renal cancer. In combination with chemotherapy, progression-free survival is often prolonged, but overall survival is not. Many tumours fail to respond initially - de novo resistance. Others develop resistance over time, with progression after a few months of treatment. The mechanisms of resistance are not well understood. The theoretical benefits of VEGF inhibitors are more likely to be realised by understanding these mechanisms and modifying therapy accordingly. This article reviews current knowledge on resistance mechanisms and the therapeutic implications.

The predictive value of genetic variations in the vascular endothelial growth factor A gene in metastatic colorectal cancer

Single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF-A) gene may have clinical implications. The aim of this study was to investigate the possible predictive value of the VEGF-A SNPs, in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treated with first-line capecitabine and oxaliplatin (XELOX). The study included 72 patients with mCRC. Genomic DNA was isolated from whole blood, and SNPs were analyzed by PCR. SNPs were correlated with response and progression-free survival (PFS). Haplotypes were estimated using the PHASE program. Response was observed in 21% of the patients with the -2578 CA genotype compared with 59% of the patients with CC+AA, P=0.002, in 26% of the patients with the -460 CT genotype compared with 57% with CC+TT, P=0.01, and in 27% of the patients with the +405 GC genotype compared with 54% with GG+CC, P=0.02. Two SNPs were significantly related to PFS. A haplotype with a significant relationship to response was identified. The results demonstrated obvious relationships between genetic variations in the VEGF-A gene and response to first-line XELOX in patients with mCRC, which translated to a significant difference in PFS. The results call for validation in a larger cohort of patients.

The relationship of VEGF polymorphisms with serum VEGF levels and progression-free survival in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVE

The vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is an important regulator of angiogenesis and vascular permeability of tumors. In the present study we evaluated the relation of five single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the VEGF gene with progression-free survival. Furthermore, we evaluated the functional significance of the SNPs as determined by the influence on serum VEGF levels in ovarian cancer.

METHODS

Serum from 143 consecutive ovarian cancer patients referred for first line platinum/paclitaxel treatment were analyzed for serum VEGF levels using commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). VEGF gene polymorphisms (-2578 C/A, -1154 G/A, -460 T/C, +405 G/C and +936C/T) were determined by real time PCR using genomic DNA extracted from whole blood samples.

RESULTS

VEGF serum levels were significantly higher in carriers of the 2578C, 460T and 405C, alleles compared to non-carriers (p=0.003, p=0.003 and p=0.001, respectively). There was no significant correlation between VEGF SNP genotypes and progression-free survival. In haplotype analysis, the multivariate survival analysis showed that progression-free survival (PFS) for the patients with the AGCGC haplotype was significantly improved compared to patients with other haplotypes (HR 1.9, p=0.036).

CONCLUSIONS

VEGF polymorphisms were found to be significantly related with serum VEGF levels. The AGCGC haplotype was found to be independently associated with improved PFS.