The impact of teach-back educational method on diabetes knowledge level and clinical parameters in type 2 diabetes patients undergoing insulin therapy

Effectiveness of teach-back for chronic kidney disease patient education: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Education is an essential component in optimising chronic disease self-management. Teach-back is a robust approach in patient education, which is suitable for varying health literacy although its effectiveness in chronic kidney disease patient education is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the impact of teach-back method in health education for improving self-management and adherence to treatment regimens in chronic kidney disease.

DESIGN

Systematic review.

PARTICIPANTS

Adults with any chronic kidney disease grade or treatment modality.

MEASUREMENTS

A comprehensive search was undertaken in MEDLINE, CINHAL, EMBASE, Cochrane library, PsychINFO, Web of Science, ERIC, JBI library and WHO International Clinical Trial Registry to identify published studies from September 2013 to December 2022. The methodological quality of studies was assessed using Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines.

RESULTS

Six studies involving 520 participants were retrieved for this review. A meta-analysis could not be conducted due to substantial heterogeneity between studies. Nevertheless, there was some evidence that teach-back could improve self-management, self-efficacy and knowledge. There was limited evidence on improvement in psychological outcomes or health-related quality of life.

CONCLUSION

Teach-back seems to improve both objective and patient-reported outcomes, although further studies are needed. Using teach-back can improve both understanding of health information and the development of skills. Kidney care teams could use teach-back for all patients as it takes account of varying patient health literacy abilities. Teach-back assists with communicating important health information to improve patients' knowledge, confidence and skills in self-managing this disease and its treatment.

Improving the efficiency of virtual insulin teaching for patients admitted to hospital through the COVID-19 pandemic: a quality improvement initiative

BACKGROUND

Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, many areas of medicine transitioned to virtual care. For patients with diabetes admitted to hospital, this included diabetes education and insulin teaching. Shifting to a virtual model of insulin teaching created new challenges for inpatient certified diabetes educators (CDE).

OBJECTIVE

We advanced a quality improvement project to improve the efficiency of safe and effective virtual insulin teaching throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. Our primary aim was to reduce the mean time between CDE referral to successful inpatient insulin teach by 0.5 days.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS

We conducted this initiative at two large academic hospitals between April 2020 and September 2021. We included all admitted patients with diabetes who were referred to our CDE for inpatient insulin teaching and education.

INTERVENTION

Alongside a multidisciplinary team of project stakeholders, we created and studied a CDE-led, virtual (video conference or telephone) insulin teaching programme. As tests of change, we added a streamlined method to deliver insulin pens to the ward for patient teaching, created a new electronic order set and included patient-care facilitators in the scheduling process.

MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURES

Our main outcome measure was the mean time between CDE referral and successful insulin teach-back. Our process measure was the percentage of successful insulin pen deliveries to the ward for teaching. As balance measures, we captured the percentage of patients with a successful insulin teach, the time between insulin teach and hospital discharge, and readmissions to hospital for diabetes-related complications.

RESULTS

Our tests of change improved the efficiency of safe and effective virtual insulin teaching by 0.27 days. The virtual model appeared less efficient than usual in-person care.

CONCLUSIONS

In our centre, virtual insulin teaching supported patients admitted to hospital through the pandemic. Improving the administrative efficiency of virtual models and leveraging key stakeholders remain important for long-term sustainability.

Practical Guidance for Healthcare Providers on Collaborating with People with Type 2 Diabetes: Advancing Treatment and Initiating Injectable Therapy

Type 2 diabetes (T2D) progresses over time, and to achieve and maintain adequate glucose control, many people eventually require injectable therapies such as insulin. However, there can be significant barriers to the initiation of these medications, both from people living with T2D and from healthcare practitioners (HCPs). Misconceptions and misinformation relating to the potential risks and benefits of injectable therapies are common and can contribute to negative perceptions regarding their use. Additionally, HCPs are often unaware of the emotional burden associated with T2D. In particular, diabetes distress is a key contributory factor that needs to be addressed to alleviate fears before diabetes education can be successful. The onus is often on the HCP to initiate effective, individualized communication with each patient and make that person feel an active and equal participant in the management of their T2D. Shared decision-making has been demonstrated to improve understanding of the pathophysiology and treatment options, to increase risk awareness, adherence, and persistence, and to improve self-management behaviors (e.g., exercise, self-care) and patient satisfaction. While therapeutic inertia can result from both patient and HCP, HCPs need to bear the responsibility for escalating therapy when necessary. A proactive approach by the HCP, combined with shared decision-making and a patient-centric approach, are important for optimal T2D management; therefore, an open and effective relationship between the HCP and the person living with T2D is essential. This article is written by a person with T2D, a nurse practitioner/Certified Diabetes Care and Education Specialist, and a clinical endocrinologist, with the goal of providing a holistic view of the management experience, exploring patient needs and expectations, recognizing and avoiding HCP and patient barriers, and providing practical advice to HCPs to empower patients who would benefit from injectable therapy.Infographic and video abstract available for this article.

The Effect of Teach-Back Combined with King Interactive Standard Mode on the Life of COPD Patients

Background

COPD is a common clinical chronic airway inflammatory disease that occurs mostly in middle-aged and older adults over the age of 40. The incidence of COPD is increasing year by year and the onset of age is gradually becoming younger.

Objective

To observe the effect of teach-back combined with king interaction on the life of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

Methods

A total of 100 COPD patients admitted to our hospital from Jan 2021 to Jan 2022 were retrospectively selected to be divided into 50 cases in the control group and 50 cases in the observation group according to the nursing methods. The control group was treated with routine nursing intervention, while the observation group was treated with teach-back combined with king interactive standard mode intervention. The differences in Self-Care Ability Assessment Scale (ESCA) score, St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) score, Mental State Assessment Scale (MSSNS) score, 6-minute walking distance (6MWD), and pulmonary function indexes were compared between the two groups before and after the intervention. The success rate and patient compliance of each index in the groups were also recorded.

Results

After 3 months and 6 months of intervention, the total SGRO score and its factor scores of self-care skills, self-care responsibility, self-concept, health knowledge level in them were all higher than those before the intervention, while the total SGRO score and its factor scores of respiratory symptoms, activity limitation, disease influence, and so on were all decreased compared with those before the intervention. The ESCA score of the observation group was significantly higher than that of the control one after 3 months and 6 months of intervention, while the SGRQ score was significantly lower than that of the control one, with statistical significance (P < 0.05). After 3 months of intervention, the total score of MSSNS and the scores of anxiety, depression, loneliness, and other factors in both groups were decreased compared with those before intervention. After 6 months of intervention, the total score of MSSNS and scores of each factor in both groups were decreased compared with those before intervention, and the MSSNS scores in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group after the intervention, which was statistically significant (P < 0.05). After 3 months and 6 months of intervention, 6MWD, forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory value in 1 second (FEV1), and FVC/FEV1 in them were all higher than those before intervention, and 6MWD and pulmonary function were significantly higher in the observation group than in the control group after 3 and 6 months of intervention, which was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The ESCA score, SGRQ score, MSSNS score, pulmonary function compliance rate, and compliance rate in the observation group were significantly higher than those in the control group, which was statistically significant (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

The use of teach-back combined with king interactive standard mode in COPD patients can improve the patient's self-care ability, reduce psychological negative emotions, and improve the quality of life.