Cross-sectional survey of awareness and behavioral pattern regarding acne and acne scar based on smartphone application

Investigation of the effect of adapalene 0.3%/benzoyl peroxide 2.5% gel in Korean patients with acne: a randomized, double-blind clinical trial, with a histopathological and immunohistochemical study

BACKGROUND

Acne vulgaris poses significant physical and psychological challenges worldwide. Data of adapalene 0.3%/benzoyl peroxide 2.5% gel (A0.3/BPO2.5) for acne treatment in Asian patients is limited.

METHODS

In this randomized double-blind clinical trial, 49 Korean patients with moderate-to-severe acne and scars were assigned to the A0.3/BPO2.5 (N.=37) or vehicle (N.=12) group. Acne and acne scar severity scores were assessed at baseline and 4, 8, 12, and 24 weeks. The primary outcomes were treatment success rate (reduction of ≥2 Investigator's Global Assessment grade and reaching a grade of 0 or 1) and proportional acne lesion and scar count reduction against the baseline. To assess histological changes, 2-mm punch biopsies were performed at baseline and week 24 on the respective inflammatory lesions or scars.

RESULTS

At week 24, the A0.3/BPO2.5 group had a significantly higher treatment success rate than the vehicle group. The total acne count, inflammatory lesion count, and non-inflammatory lesion count percentages (against baselines) with A0.3/BPO2.5 and the vehicle were 12.1% vs. 96.7%, 8.0% vs. 101.2%, and 13.3% vs. 98.9%, respectively (all P<0.001). Scar count percentages (against baselines) with A0.3/BPO2.5 and the vehicle were 27.3% and 96.5%, respectively (P<0.001). Significant elevations in collagen 1 and 3, elastin, CK15, and p63 levels, with increases of 172.7%, 230.6%, 176.5%, 286.2%, and 105.9%, respectively, in comparison to baseline (all P<0.05). No major adverse events leading to discontinuation were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

A0.3/BPO2.5 was an effective and safe treatment for acne and acne scars in Asian patients supported by robust histopathological and immunohistochemical evidence.

Alterations in epidermal stem cells within the pilosebaceous unit in atrophic acne scars

BACKGROUND

Atrophic acne scarring is a common sequela of inflammatory acne, causing significant problems for affected patients. Although prolonged inflammation and subsequent aberrant tissue regeneration are considered the underlying pathogenesis, the role of epidermal stem cells, which are crucial to the regeneration of pilosebaceous units, remains unknown.

OBJECTIVES

To examine the changes occurring in epidermal stem cells in atrophic acne scars.

METHODS

Changes in collagen, elastic fibre and human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-DR expression were analysed in normal skin and inflammatory acne lesions at days 1, 3 and 7 after development. The expression of epidermal stem cell markers and proliferation markers was compared between normal skin and mature atrophic acne scar tissue.

RESULTS

In acne lesions, inflammation had invaded into pilosebaceous units over time. Their normal structure had been destructed and replaced with a reduced amount of collagen and elastic fibre. Expression of stem cell markers including CD34, p63, leucine-rich repeat-containing G protein-coupled receptor (LGR)6 and LGR5, which are expressed in the interfollicular epidermis, isthmus and bulge of hair follicles, significantly decreased in atrophic acne scar tissue compared to normal skin. Epidermal proliferation was significantly reduced in scar tissue.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that as inflammatory acne lesions progress, inflammation gradually infiltrates the pilosebaceous unit and affects the resident stem cells. This disruption impedes the normal regeneration of the interfollicular epidermis and adnexal structures, resulting in atrophic acne scars.

Modern techniques in addressing facial acne scars: A thorough analysis

BACKGROUND

Facial acne scars are a prevalent concern, leading to the development of various treatment modalities.

OBJECTIVES

This review aims to explore the latest advancements in the treatment of facial acne scars, focusing on both surgical and non-surgical methods.

METHODS

The non-surgical treatments reviewed include topical medications (such as retinoids and alpha hydroxy acids) and non-invasive procedures (like microdermabrasion and chemical peels). Surgical options discussed are punch excision, subcision, and fractional laser treatments.

RESULTS

Combination therapy, integrating both surgical and non-surgical approaches, is frequently utilized to achieve optimal results in scar improvement.

CONCLUSION

Recent advancements in the treatment of facial acne scars provide promising options for individuals seeking improvement. However, these treatments have associated risks and potential adverse effects, highlighting the importance of consulting a dermatologist before beginning any treatment regimen.

The efficacy and safety of low- versus high-fluence fractional picosecond Nd:YAG 1064-nm laser in the treatment of acne scars: A randomized split-face comparison study

BACKGROUND

Differences in clinical efficacy based on the fluence of fractional picosecond laser treatment for acne scars are unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy and safety of low-fluence versus high-fluence fractional picosecond Nd:YAG 1064-nm laser treatment in acne scar patients.

METHODS

In this 12-week, investigator-blinded, randomized, split-face study, 25 patients with moderate-to-severe acne scars received three sessions of high-fluence laser treatment (1.0 J/cm2 ) on one side of their face and low-fluence (0.3 J/cm2 ) on the other side every 4 weeks. Patients were assessed using acne scar counts, the scar global assessment (SGA), and the ECCA scar grading scale every 4 weeks. The histological analysis compared the acne scars obtained before and 4 weeks after treatment.

RESULTS

At their last visit, 88.00% and 92.00% of the subjects achieved >30% reduction in scar counts on the low- and high-fluence sides, respectively, without a significant difference between the two sides. On both sides, the scar counts, SGA, and ECCA score significantly improved 4 weeks after the last treatment. Although the high-fluence side showed a greater reduction in scar counts (-66.73%) than the low-fluence side (-62.13%), the two sides had no significant difference in the grading scores. The high-fluence side showed significantly more severe pain and higher side-effect scores immediately and 4 weeks after treatment. Histological analysis revealed a significantly increased collagen, elastin, and vimentin expression after treatment on the low-fluence side.

CONCLUSIONS

The low-fluence setting demonstrated comparable efficacy and superior safety in treating acne scars compared with the high-fluence setting.

Knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions of hidradenitis suppurativa among young adults in Singapore

Background

The prevalence of hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is 0.00033% to 4.10% globally. Few epidemiological studies derive from Asia, with social stigmatization postulated to result in under-diagnosis.

Objective

This study aimed to assess the self-reported prevalence of HS, and the knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions towards HS among Singaporean young-adults.

Methods

A cross-sectional study (n = 158) was conducted by anonymous online questionnaire. The association between demographic factors and risk of potentially undiagnosed HS was evaluated using multivariable logistic regression. Differences between attitude-perception scores by demographic factors and knowledge of HS were tested using two-sample t-tests.

Results

The prevalence of diagnosed and potentially undiagnosed HS was 0.63% and 8.9%, respectively. Non-Chinese had significantly higher social attitude-perception scores than Chinese (P = .029). Females had significantly higher social (P = .048) as well as economic and work (P = .037) attitude-perception scores than males. Those with knowledge of HS had significantly higher attitude-perception scores for interpersonal (P = .031) and social (P = .0052) subsections.

Limitations

Small sample size, low frequency of HS cases, and self-reported prevalence may not generalize to the broader population in Singapore.

Conclusion

Our results suggest a potential underdiagnosis of HS. Non-Chinese stigmatize HS less than Chinese, and females less than males. Individuals with knowledge of HS might be more open to interpersonal and social interactions with HS sufferers.

Automated Facial Acne Lesion Detecting and Counting Algorithm for Acne Severity Evaluation and Its Utility in Assisting Dermatologists

BACKGROUND

Although lesion counting is an evaluation method that effectively analyzes facial acne severity, its usage is limited because of difficult implementation.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to develop and validate an automated algorithm that detects and counts acne lesions by type, and to evaluate its clinical applicability as an assistance tool through a reader test.

METHODS

A total of 20,699 lesions (closed and open comedones, papules, nodules/cysts, and pustules) were manually labeled on 1213 facial images of 398 facial acne photography sets (frontal and both lateral views) acquired from 258 patients and used for training and validating algorithms based on a convolutional neural network for classifying five classes of acne lesions or for binary classification into noninflammatory and inflammatory lesions.

RESULTS

In the validation dataset, the highest mean average precision was 28.48 for the binary classification algorithm. Pearson's correlation of lesion counts between algorithm and ground-truth was 0.72 (noninflammatory) and 0.90 (inflammatory), respectively. In the reader test, eight readers (100.0%) detected and counted lesions more accurately using the algorithm compared with the reader-alone evaluation.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, our algorithm demonstrated clinically applicable performance in detecting and counting facial acne lesions by type and its utility as an assistance tool for evaluating acne severity.

Beyond the Surface: A Deeper Look at the Psychosocial Impacts of Acne Scarring

Post-acne scarring is a common consequence of acne vulgaris with no universal cure. Although there have been many recent advances to address acne scars physically, there is still a lack of research that investigates their psychosocial impacts. Our comprehensive PubMed search presents an overview of existing information to highlight known sources of mental distress caused by post-acne scarring, both related to and independent of the psychosocial detriments caused early on by active acne. The literature indicates that acne scarring is a distinct condition from acne vulgaris and therefore requires a comprehensive clinical approach unique from those available for active acne.

Structure, quality and accessibility of the Dutch acne healthcare; a care providers' perspective

Background: Despite the wide range of available treatment modalities a delay between the first outbreak of acne vulgaris and an effective treatment outcome is experienced by many patients. Considering the growing incentives to improve patient satisfaction and quality of care while reducing healthcare costs, insights into the structure, quality and accessibility of acne healthcare services beyond guidelines are therefore needed.Objective: To provide insights into the structure, quality and accessibility of acne healthcare services.Methods: A qualitative study was conducted according to the principles of 'situational analysis'. The Dutch acne healthcare system was taken as an illustrative example. Twenty-four semi-structured interviews were conducted among representatives of the 4 main Dutch professions providing acne care. All interviews were audiotaped, transcribed verbatim and analyzed.Results: Multiple facilitators and barriers emerged from the interviews. Identified facilitators were care providers delivering personalized patient care and having a positive attitude toward formalized multidisciplinary care delivery. A lack of streamlined referral pathways and standardization in acne severity-assessment, financial aspects and unfamiliarity with the content and added value of other acne care professionals were identified as barriers. Further research is recommended to investigate how de-medicalisation, the gatekeepers role, and the impact of location and work setting influence the quality of and accessibility to care.Conclusions: Identified facilitators and barriers and an overall positive attitude of care providers toward multidisciplinary care provision provides opportunities for the utilization of future guidelines involving streamlined referral pathways and good working arrangements between all acne care providing professions.