A variation of the Nijmegen-Bethesda assay using heat or a novel heat/cold pretreatment for the detection of FIX inhibitors in the presence of residual FIX activity

Functional determination of emicizumab in presence of factor VIII activity

BACKGROUND

Accurate measurement of emicizumab in the presence of factor (F) VIII is required in patients with severe hemophilia A treated with emicizumab, as well as additional need for FVIII substitution or emicizumab prophylaxis in patients with acquired or moderate to mild hemophilia A. However, the presence of FVIII potentially biases the results.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the impact of plasma FVIII activity on determined emicizumab levels and evaluate different strategies for correction for or preanalytical inhibition of FVIII.

METHODS

Evaluated strategies comprised of the following: (1) calculation of actual emicizumab plasma levels based on measured FVIII activities and FVIII-affected emicizumab values, (2) preanalytical heat treatment (56 °C for 40 minutes), and (3) neutralization of FVIII activity using FVIII inhibitors. Emicizumab levels and FVIII activities were measured using a modified FVIII one-stage clotting assay and a chromogenic FVIII assay based on bovine factors, respectively.

RESULTS

Spiking experiments revealed a consistent linear association between FVIII activities and determined (FVIII-affected) emicizumab results at different emicizumab input levels (∼0.12 μg/mL per IU/dL of FVIII). This principally allowed for mathematical correction of measured emicizumab levels in the presence of FVIII. While a 40% to 50% activity loss of intrinsic plasma emicizumab through heat treatment was observed in patient samples, emicizumab spiked into FVIII-deficient plasma was not or only marginally affected. Application of inhibitor-based FVIII neutralization led to good agreement of results when compared with direct quantification of emicizumab by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.

CONCLUSION

Inhibitor-based FVIII neutralization appears to be a feasible strategy for accurate measurement of plasma emicizumab levels in the presence of FVIII activity.

International Council for Standardization in Haematology recommendations for laboratory measurement of factor VIII and FIX type I inhibitors

This guidance document has been prepared on behalf of the International Council for Standardisation in Hematology. The aim of the document is to provide guidance and recommendations on the measurement of factor VIII (FVIII) and factor IX (FIX) inhibitors. After an introduction on the clinical background and relevance of factor VIII and factor IX inhibitor testing, the following aspects of laboratory testing are included: screening for inhibitors, assay principle, sample requirements, testing requirements and interpretation, quality assurance, interferences and recent developments. This guidance document focusses on recommendations for a standardised procedure for the laboratory measurement of FVIII and FIX type I inhibitors. The recommendations are based on published data in peer-reviewed literature and expert opinion.

Longitudinal profiling of anti-factor VIII antibodies in Japanese patients with congenital hemophilia A during factor VIII replacement and immune-tolerance induction therapy

When patients with hemophilia A develop factor VIII (FVIII) inhibitors, FVIII replacement therapy becomes ineffective. Although immune-tolerance induction (ITI) therapy has been used to eradicate inhibitors, treatment is unsuccessful in approximately 30% of cases. However, the mechanism behind treatment failure remains unclarified. We retrospectively examined the longitudinal profiles of immunoglobulin G (IgG) subclasses and/or the inhibitory activities of FVIII in plasma samples from 14 Japanese patients with congenital hemophilia A during hemostatic, FVIII replacement, and/or ITI therapies. In five patients, an increase in IgG4 was observed simultaneously with a decrease in IgG1 when the patient had a history of relatively high FVIII inhibitor titers, reflecting an apparent change in humoral immunity. In addition, we examined the reactivity and specificity of the patients' anti-FVIII IgG1 and IgG4 to FVIII domains by immunoblotting. Under our experimental conditions, plasma from three patients with historically higher inhibitor titers appeared to have high titers of antibodies against the A2-a2 domain, which did not necessarily correlate with ITI failure. These observations may improve scientific understanding of the immune response to infused FVIII in patients with hemophilia A.

Factor VIII/IX inhibitor testing practices in the United Kingdom: Results of a UKHCDO and UKNEQAS national survey

INTRODUCTION

Inhibitor formation is the greatest challenge facing persons with haemophilia treated with factor concentrates. The gold standard testing methodologies are the Nijmegen-Bethesda assay (NBA) for FVIII and Bethesda assay (BA) for FIX inhibitors, which are affected by pre-analytical and inter-laboratory variability.

AIMS

To evaluate inhibitor testing methodology and assess correlation between self-reported and actual methodology.

METHODS

Methodology was evaluated using a survey distributed alongside a UK National External Quality Assessment Service Blood Coagulation external quality assurance (EQA) exercise for FVIII and FIX inhibitor testing.

RESULTS

Seventy four survey and EQA exercise responses were received (response rate 63.2%), with 50 paired survey/EQA results. 47.1% (33/70) reported using the NBA and 42.9% (30/70) the BA for FVIII inhibitor testing. Review of FVIII inhibitor assay methodology demonstrated discrepancy (self-reported to actual) in 64.3% (BA reporting) and 27.6% (NBA reporting). Pre-analytical heat treatment was used by 32.4%, most commonly 56°C for 30 minutes. Assay cut-offs of 0.1-1.0 BU/mL were reported. EQA samples (acquired FVIII and congenital FIX) demonstrated titres and coefficients of variation (CV) of 3.1 BU/mL (0.7-15.4 BU/mL; CV = 43%) and 18.0 BU/mL (0-117 BU/mL; CV = 33%), respectively. No significant assay or laboratory factors were found to explain this variance, which could have resulted in change in management for 6 patients (5 misclassified high-titre FVIII inhibitors and 1 false negative for a FIX inhibitor).

CONCLUSIONS

Heterogeneity was seen at each stage of assay methodology. No assay-related factors were found to explain variation in inhibitor titres. Further standardization is required to improve inhibitor quantification to guide patient care.

Nonacog beta pegol (N9-GP) in hemophilia B: First report on safety and efficacy in previously untreated and minimally treated patients

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE

We report the first analysis of an extended half-life recombinant factor IX, nonacog beta pegol (N9-GP), in previously untreated patients (PUPs) and minimally treated patients with hemophilia B.

METHODS

Paradigm 6 (Safety and Efficacy of Nonacog Beta Pegol [N9-GP] in Previously Untreated Patients With Haemophilia B) is a multicenter, open-label, single-arm, phase 3 trial. Main inclusion criteria were males aged < 6 years, with hemophilia B with factor IX (FIX) activity ≤ 2%, who were previously untreated or with ≤ 3 exposure days (EDs) to FIX-containing products. Patients received N9-GP 40 IU/kg once weekly (prophylaxis) or individualized dosing (preprophylaxis). Bleeds were treated with N9-GP 40 IU/kg (80 IU/kg if severe). The primary end point was incidence of anti-FIX inhibitory antibodies (inhibitors). Secondary end points included safety outcomes and annualized bleeding rate (ABR).

RESULTS

At data cutoff (August 31, 2018), 38 patients had been screened, and 37 had received N9-GP (median age, 1.0 years [range, 0-4]). Total in-trial EDs amounted to 2833, representing ~ 65 patient-years. Two (6.1%) of 33 "at-risk" patients (patients with ≥ 10 EDs plus patients who developed inhibitors) developed high-titer inhibitors and were withdrawn. No other safety concerns, including thromboembolic events, were identified. In the prophylaxis group (n = 28), 67.9% were bleed free; all bleeds (n = 15) were treated with one N9-GP injection; and overall, spontaneous, and traumatic ABRs were low (median ABRs of 0.0, 0.0, and 0.0, respectively; modeled mean ABRs of 0.31, 0.08, and 0.23, respectively). Estimated mean FIX trough activity was 15.0%.

CONCLUSION

We report an inhibitor incidence of 6.1%, which is within the expected range for PUPs with hemophilia B. No other safety concerns were identified; moreover, N9-GP provided effective hemostatic coverage.

The rapid Bethesda assay is equivalent to the standard Bethesda assay for detection of factor IX inhibitors in patients with severe haemophilia B

INTRODUCTION

The time-dependent nature of factor VIII (FVIII) inhibitors is well described, and the standard FVIII Bethesda assay used to measure inhibitors incorporates a 2-hour incubation. Despite case reports and reviews describing the immediate-acting nature of factor IX (FIX) inhibitors, many coagulation laboratories continue to use a traditional prolonged incubation for FIX Bethesda assays. To our knowledge, a comprehensive evaluation of the FIX Bethesda assay without incubation has not been reported.

AIM

The goal of this study was to evaluate the performance of a rapid FIX Bethesda (ie no incubation) compared with the standard Bethesda assay (2-hour incubation).

METHODS

The analysis used a Bethesda assay configured for either immediate testing or a 2-hour incubation. Samples from 14 haemophilia B patients with inhibitors and 9 non-human controls were tested.

RESULTS

The two assays yielded similar performance overall. The average per cent difference in inhibitor titre between the rapid and standard FIX Bethesda assay was -3% (range -15% to +13%; P = .175) for patient samples and -2% (range -17% to +14%; P = .376) for controls.

CONCLUSION

The rapid Bethesda assay showed good agreement with the standard Bethesda assay for determination of inhibitor levels in patients with severe haemophilia B. The rapid assay allows for faster assessment of inhibitors in patients with severe haemophilia B and has the potential to improve the ability of the coagulation laboratory to perform testing from a logistical viewpoint. Further studies involving larger numbers of patients would be important to confirm our findings.

Laboratory testing for factor VIII and IX inhibitors in haemophilia: A review

Inhibitors are antibodies directed against haemophilia treatment products which interfere with their function. Factor VIII (FVIII) inhibitors in haemophilia A and factor IX (FIX) inhibitors in haemophilia B are significant clinically when they require a change in a patient's treatment regimen. Their persistence may increase morbidity and mortality. Multiple laboratory tests are now available for detecting and understanding inhibitors in haemophilia. Inhibitors are traditionally measured by their interference in clotting or chromogenic factor assays. They may also be detected using immunologic assays, such as enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay or fluorescence immunoassay. Anti-FVIII or anti-FIX antibodies of IgG4 subclass best correlate with the presence of functional inhibitors. Improvements in inhibitor measurement have been recently introduced. Preanalytical heat treatment of patient specimens allows testing of patients without delaying treatment. Use of chromogenic and immunologic assays may aid in identification of false-positive results, which are frequent among low-titre inhibitors. Validated reagent substitutions can be used to reduce assay cost. New methods for defining assay positivity and reporting low-titre inhibitors have been suggested. Challenges remain in the areas of quality control, assay standardization, monitoring of patients undergoing immune tolerance induction therapy and testing in the presence of modified and novel treatment products.