THrombolysis for Acute Wake-up and unclear-onset Strokes with alteplase at 0·6 mg/kg (THAWS) Trial

Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided Intravenous Thrombolysis in Cardioembolic Stroke Patients With Unknown Time of Onset - Subanalysis of the THAWS Randomized Control Trial

BACKGROUND

We investigated the clinical effect of intravenous thrombolysis using a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided approach in cardioembolic stroke (CE) patients with unknown time of onset.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This subanalysis of the THAWS trial assessed the efficacy and safety of alteplase 0.6 mg/kg in CE patients with unknown time of onset and showing diffusion-weighted imaging-fluid-attenuated inversion recovery mismatch. Patients were classified as CE and non-CE using the SSS-TOAST classification system during the acute period. The efficacy outcome was a modified Rankin Scale score of 0-1 at 90 days. In all, 126 patients from the THAWS trial were included in this study, of whom 45 (35.7%) were diagnosed with CE. In the CE group, a favorable outcome was numerically more frequent in the alteplase than control group (52% vs. 35%; adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.25; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.50-9.99). However, in the non-CE group, favorable outcomes were comparable between the alteplase and control groups (44% vs. 55%, respectively; aOR 0.39; 95% CI 0.12-1.21). Treatment-by-cohort interaction for a favorable outcome was modestly significant between the CE and non-CE groups (P=0.069). In the CE group, no patients experienced symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) or parenchymal hematoma Type II following thrombolysis.

CONCLUSIONS

When an MRI-guided approach is used, CE patients with unknown time of onset appear to be suitable candidates for thrombolysis.

Arachidonic acid level is related to early motor recovery following intracerebral hemorrhage with severe motor paralysis

BACKGROUND

Low arachidonic acid (AA) levels are reportedly associated with unfavorable outcomes in intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH).

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to clarify whether serum AA levels might be associated with a good recovery from severe motor paralysis in the early stage of hospitalization.

METHODS

From among consecutive ICH patients between October 2012 and December 2021, patients with a sum of upper and lower extremity National Institutes of Health stroke scale (NIHSS) scores of 4-8 at admission (severe motor paralysis) were included. We defined good early recovery from severe motor paralysis as a sum of upper and lower extremity NIHSS scores of 0-3 on day 7 after admission, and that of individual upper and lower extremities as NIHSS scores of 0-1 on day 7 after admission. We aimed to assess whether serum AA levels might be associated with good early recovery from severe motor paralysis.

RESULTS

We screened 377 consecutive ICH patients, including 140 with severe motor paralysis (88 (63%) males, median age 64 years). Recovery from severe motor paralysis was seen in 48 (34%). Higher AA levels (PR 1.243, 95% CI 1.042 to 1.483, p = 0.016) were independently associated with good overall recovery, and good recovery of upper and lower extremities separately (upper extremity: PR 1.319, 95% CI 1.101 to 1.580, p = 0.003; lower extremity: PR 1.293, 95% CI 1.115 to 1.499, p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Higher AA levels may contribute to a good early motor recovery in patients with severe motor paralysis due to ICH.

A deep learning analysis of stroke onset time prediction and comparison to DWI-FLAIR mismatch

INTRODUCTION

When time since stroke onset is unknown, DWI-FLAIR mismatch rating is an established technique for patient stratification. A visible DWI lesion without corresponding parenchymal hyperintensity on FLAIR suggests time since onset of under 4.5 h and thus a potential benefit from intravenous thrombolysis. To improve accuracy and availability of the mismatch concept, deep learning might be able to augment human rating and support decision-making in these cases.

METHODS

We used unprocessed DWI and coregistered FLAIR imaging data to train a deep learning model to predict dichotomized time since ischemic stroke onset. We analyzed the performance of Group Convolutional Neural Networks compared to other deep learning methods. Unlabeled imaging data was used for pre-training. Prediction performance of the best deep learning model was compared to the performance of four independent junior and senior raters. Additionally, in cases deemed indeterminable by human raters, model ratings were used to augment human performance. Post-hoc gradient-based explanations were analyzed to gain insights into model predictions.

RESULTS

Our best predictive model performed comparably to human raters. Using model ratings in cases deemed indeterminable by human raters improved rating accuracy and interrater agreement for junior and senior ratings. Post-hoc explainability analyses showed that the model localized stroke lesions to derive predictions.

DISCUSSION

Our analysis shows that deep learning based clinical decision support has the potential to improve the accessibility of the DWI-FLAIR mismatch concept by supporting patient stratification.

Retrospective Evaluation of the Results of Low-Dose Intravenous Thrombolytic Therapy in Acute Ischemic Stroke

Objectives

This study aimed to investigate the clinical data of patients with acute ischemic stroke who received low-dose intravenous (IV) thrombolytic therapy (0.9 mg/kg; maximum 50 mg) for various reasons, compare the obtained results with those of patients who received standard-dose thrombolytic therapy, and discuss them in light of the literature.

Methods

Patients who received IV thrombolytic therapy within 4.5 h of symptom onset between January 2015 and June 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into the low-dose group (0.9 mg/kg; max. 50 mg) and the standard-dose group (0.9 mg/kg; max 90 mg) according to the thrombolytic therapy dose, after which demographic data and clinical results were analyzed.

Results

A total of 109 patients receiving thrombolytic therapy (19 patients in the low-dose group and 90 patients in the standard-dose group) were included in the study. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of good outcome rates (47.4% vs. 52.2%). There was no statistically significant difference in terms of symptomatic and asymptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage rates.

Conclusion

Our study showed similar efficacy and safety for low-dose IV thrombolytic therapy compared with standard-dose IV thrombolytic therapy administered within 4.5 h of symptom onset in patients with acute ischemic stroke.

Time to Wake-Up: Extending the Window for Management of Unknown-Onset Strokes

The term "Wake-Up Stroke" is applied to a patient who displays no symptoms before sleep, but wakes with neurologic deficits suggestive of stroke. The current guidelines for acute ischemic stroke limit intravenous tissue plasminogen activator use to stroke patients in whom symptom onset or last known well is less than 4.5 hours. Approximately one-third of acute ischemic stroke patients present with unknown time of symptom onset and are often not eligible for intravenous reperfusion therapy in clinical practice. This review provides an overview of several earlier trials that used advanced neuroimaging to determine eligibility for reperfusion therapy in patients with unknown stroke onset. The reassuring results of these earlier trials that led to recent thrombolysis trials specifically targeted at "wake-up stroke" patients are discussed in this review. Ongoing studies aim to expand our knowledge regarding the safety and efficacy of thrombolysis in these patients.

Developing a model for estimating infarction onset time based on computed tomography radiomics in patients with acute middle cerebral artery occlusion

BACKGROUND

Radiomics analysis is a newly emerging quantitative image analysis technique. The aim of this study was to extract a radiomics signature from the computed tomography (CT) imaging to determine the infarction onset time in patients with acute middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO).

METHODS

A total of 123 patients with acute MCAO in the M1 segment (85 patients in the development cohort and 38 patients in the validation cohort) were enrolled in the present study. Clinicoradiological profiles, including head CT without contrast enhancement and computed tomographic angiography (CTA), were collected. The time from stroke onset (TFS) was classified into two subcategories: ≤ 4.5 h, and > 4.5 h. The middle cerebral artery (MCA) territory on CT images was segmented to extract and score the radiomics features associated with the TFS. In addition, the clinicoradiological factors related to the TFS were identified. Subsequently, a combined model of the radiomics signature and clinicoradiological factors was constructed to distinguish the TFS ≤ 4.5 h. Finally, we evaluated the overall performance of our constructed model in an external validation sample of ischemic stroke patients with acute MCAO in the M1 segment.

RESULTS

The area under the curve (AUC) of the radiomics signature for discriminating the TFS in the development and validation cohorts was 0.770 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.665-0.875) and 0.792 (95% CI: 0.633-0.950), respectively. The AUC of the combined model comprised of the radiomics signature, age and ASPECTS on CT in the development and validation cohorts was 0.808 (95% CI: 0.701-0.916) and 0.833 (95% CI: 0.702-0.965), respectively. In the external validation cohort, the AUC of the radiomics signature was 0.755 (95% CI: 0.614-0.897), and the AUC of the combined model was 0.820 (95% CI: 0.712-0.928).

CONCLUSIONS

The CT-based radiomics signature is a valuable tool for discriminating the TFS in patients with acute MCAO in the M1 segment, which may guide the use of thrombolysis therapy in patients with indeterminate stroke onset time.

Adapting Clinical Practice of Thrombolysis for Acute Ischemic Stroke Beyond 4.5 Hours: A Review of the Literature

Several clinical trials have demonstrated that advanced neuroimaging can select patients for recanalization therapy in an extended time window. The favorable functional outcomes and safety profile of these studies have led to the incorporation of neuroimaging in endovascular treatment guidelines, and most recently, also extended to decision making on thrombolysis. Two randomized clinical trials have demonstrated that patients who are not amenable to endovascular thrombectomy within 4.5 hours from symptoms discovery or beyond 4.5 hours from the last-known-well time may also be safely treated with intravenous thrombolysis and have a clinical benefit above the risk of safety concerns. With the growing aging population, increased stroke incidence in the young, and the impact of evolving medical practice, healthcare and stroke systems of care need to adapt continuously to provide evidence-based care efficiently. Therefore, understanding and incorporating appropriate screening strategies is critical for the prompt recognition of potentially eligible patients for extended-window intravenous thrombolysis. Here we review the clinical trial evidence for thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke in the extended time window and provide a review of new enrolling clinical trials that include thrombolysis intervention beyond the 4.5 hour window.

Cerebral microbleeds development after stroke thrombolysis: A secondary analysis of the THAWS randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND AND AIM

We determined to investigate the incidence and clinical impact of new cerebral microbleeds after intravenous thrombolysis in patients with acute stroke.

METHODS

The THAWS was a multicenter, randomized trial to study the efficacy and safety of intravenous thrombolysis with alteplase in patients with wake-up stroke or unknown onset stroke. Prescheduled T2*-weighted imaging assessed cerebral microbleeds at three time points: baseline, 22-36 h, and 7-14 days. Outcomes included new cerebral microbleeds development, modified Rankin Scale (mRS) ≥3 at 90 days, and change in the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score from 24 h to 7 days.

RESULTS

Of all 131 patients randomized in the THAWS trial, 113 patients (mean 74.3 ± 12.6 years, 50 female, 62 allocated to intravenous thrombolysis) were available for analysis. Overall, 46 (41%) had baseline cerebral microbleeds (15 strictly lobar cerebral microbleeds, 14 mixed cerebral microbleeds, and 17 deep cerebral microbleeds). New cerebral microbleeds only emerged in the intravenous thrombolysis group (seven patients, 11%) within a median of 28.3 h, and did not additionally increase within a median of 7.35 days. In adjusted models, number of cerebral microbleeds (relative risk (RR) 1.30, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.17-1.44), mixed distribution (RR 19.2, 95% CI: 3.94-93.7), and cerebral microbleeds burden ≥5 (RR 44.9, 95% CI: 5.78-349.8) were associated with new cerebral microbleeds. New cerebral microbleeds were associated with an increase in NIHSS score (p = 0.023). Treatment with alteplase in patients with baseline ≥5 cerebral microbleeds resulted in a numerical shift toward worse outcomes on ordinal mRS (median [IQR]; 4 [3-4] vs. 0 [0-3]), compared with those with <5 cerebral microbleeds (common odds ratio 17.1, 95% CI: 0.76-382.8). The association of baseline ≥5 cerebral microbleeds with ordinal mRS score differed according to the treatment group (p interaction = 0.042).

CONCLUSION

New cerebral microbleeds developed within 36 h in 11% of the patients after intravenous thrombolysis, and they were significantly associated with mixed-distribution and ≥5 cerebral microbleeds. New cerebral microbleeds development might impede neurological improvement. Furthermore, cerebral microbleeds burden might affect the effect of alteplase.

European Stroke Organisation (ESO) guidelines on intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischaemic stroke

Intravenous thrombolysis is the only approved systemic reperfusion treatment for patients with acute ischaemic stroke. These European Stroke Organisation (ESO) guidelines provide evidence-based recommendations to assist physicians in their clinical decisions with regard to intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischaemic stroke. These guidelines were developed based on the ESO standard operating procedure and followed the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. The working group identified relevant clinical questions, performed systematic reviews and meta-analyses of the literature, assessed the quality of the available evidence, and wrote recommendations. Expert consensus statements were provided if not enough evidence was available to provide recommendations based on the GRADE approach. We found high quality evidence to recommend intravenous thrombolysis with alteplase to improve functional outcome in patients with acute ischemic stroke within 4.5 h after symptom onset. We also found high quality evidence to recommend intravenous thrombolysis with alteplase in patients with acute ischaemic stroke on awakening from sleep, who were last seen well more than 4.5 h earlier, who have MRI DWI-FLAIR mismatch, and for whom mechanical thrombectomy is not planned. These guidelines provide further recommendations regarding patient subgroups, late time windows, imaging selection strategies, relative and absolute contraindications to alteplase, and tenecteplase. Intravenous thrombolysis remains a cornerstone of acute stroke management. Appropriate patient selection and timely treatment are crucial. Further randomized controlled clinical trials are needed to inform clinical decision-making with regard to tenecteplase and the use of intravenous thrombolysis before mechanical thrombectomy in patients with large vessel occlusion.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided Thrombolysis (0.6 mg/kg) Was Beneficial for Unknown Onset Stroke Above a Certain Core Size: THAWS RCT Substudy

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

We determined to identify patients with unknown onset stroke who could have favorable 90-day outcomes after low-dose thrombolysis from the THAWS (Thrombolysis for Acute Wake-Up and Unclear-Onset Strokes With Alteplase at 0.6 mg/kg) database.

METHODS

This was a subanalysis of an investigator-initiated, multicenter, randomized, open-label, blinded-end point trial. Patients with stroke with a time last-known-well >4.5 hours who showed a mismatch between diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive alteplase at 0.6 mg/kg intravenously or standard medical treatment. The patients were dichotomized by ischemic core size or National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score, and the effects of assigned treatments were compared in each group. The efficacy outcome was favorable outcome at 90 days, defined as a modified Rankin Scale score of 0 to 1.

RESULTS

The median DWI-Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) was 9, and the median ischemic core volume was 2.5 mL. Both favorable outcome (47.1% versus 48.3%) and any intracranial hemorrhage (26% versus 14%) at 22 to 36 hours were comparable between the 68 thrombolyzed patients and the 58 control patients. There was a significant treatment-by-cohort interaction for favorable outcome between dichotomized patients by ASPECTS on DWI (P=0.026) and core volume (P=0.035). Favorable outcome was more common in the alteplase group than in the control group in patients with DWI-ASPECTS 5 to 8 (RR, 4.75 [95% CI, 1.33-30.2]), although not in patients with DWI-ASPECTS 9 to 10. Favorable outcome tended to be more common in the alteplase group than in the control group in patients with core volume >6.4 mL (RR, 6.15 [95% CI, 0.87-43.64]), although not in patients with volume ≤6.4 mL. The frequency of any intracranial hemorrhage did not differ significantly between the 2 treatment groups in any dichotomized patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients developing unknown onset stroke with DWI-ASPECTS 5 to 8 showed favorable outcomes more commonly after low-dose thrombolysis than after standard treatment. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique Identifier: NCT02002325. URL: https://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr; Unique Identifier: UMIN000011630.

Pathophysiologic mechanisms, neuroimaging and treatment in wake-up stroke

Wake-up stroke (WUS) or ischemic stroke occurring during sleep accounts for 14%-29.6% of all ischemic strokes. Management of WUS is complicated by its narrow therapeutic time window and attributable risk factors, which can affect the safety and efficacy of administering intravenous (IV) tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA). This manuscript will review risk factors of WUS, with a focus on obstructive sleep apnea, potential mechanisms of WUS, and evaluate studies assessing safety and efficacy of IV t-PA treatment in WUS patients guided by neuroimaging to estimate time of symptom onset. The authors used PubMed (1966 to March 2018) to search for the term "Wake-Up Stroke" cross-referenced with "pathophysiology," ''pathogenesis," "pathology," "magnetic resonance imaging," "obstructive sleep apnea," or "treatment." English language Papers were reviewed. Also reviewed were pertinent papers from the reference list of the above-matched manuscripts. Studies that focused only on acute Strokes with known-onset of symptoms were not reviewed. Literature showed several potential risk factors associated with increased risk of WUS. Although the onset of WUS is unknown, a few studies investigated the potential benefit of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in estimating the age of onset which encouraged conducting clinical trials assessing the efficacy of MRI-guided thrombolytic therapy in WUS.

Thrombolysis beyond 4.5 h in Acute Ischemic Stroke

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this article is to review the current approaches using neuroimaging techniques to expand eligibility for intravenous thrombolytic therapy in acute ischemic stroke patients with stroke of unknown symptom onset.

RECENT FINDINGS

In recent years, several randomized, placebo-controlled trials have shown neuroimaging-guided approaches to be feasible in determining eligibility for alteplase beyond 4.5 h from last known well, and efficacious for reducing disability. DWI-FLAIR mismatch on MRI is an effective tool to identify stroke lesions less than 4.5 h in onset in patients with stroke of unknown symptom onset. Additionally, an automated perfusion-based approach, assessing for a disproportionate amount of salvageable tissue, is effective in identifying patients likely to benefit from late window alteplase treatment. In patients with stroke of unknown symptom onset, an individualized approach using neuroimaging to determine time of stroke onset or presence of salvageable brain tissue is feasible in the acute setting and associated with improved long-term outcomes.

CT radiomics features as a diagnostic tool for classifying basal ganglia infarction onset time

OBJECTIVE

This study was aimed to discuss the application of radiomics using CT analysis in basal ganglia infarction (BGI) for determining the time since stroke onset (TSS) which could provide critical information to clinicians in deciding stroke treatment options such as thrombolysis.

METHODS

This study involved 316 patients with BGI (237 in the training cohort and 79 in the independent validation cohort). Region of interest segmentation and feature extraction was done by ITK-SNAP software. We used the existing medical history to binarize the TSS into two categories: positive (< 4.5 h) and negative (≥ 4.5 h). The key radiomic signature features were retrieved by the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator multiple logistic regression model. Receiver operating characteristic curve and AUC analysis were used to evaluate the performance of the radiomic signature in both the training and validation cohorts.

RESULTS

295 features were extracted from a manually outlined infarction region. Five features were selected to construct the radiomic signature for TSS classification purposes. The performance of the radiomic signature to distinguish between positive and negative in the training cohort was good, with an AUC of 0.982, a sensitivity of 0.929, and a specificity of 0.959. In the validation cohort, the radiomic signature showed an AUC of 0.974, a sensitivity of 0.951, and a specificity of 0.961.

CONCLUSION

A unique radiomic signature was constructed for use as a diagnostic tool for discriminating the TSS in BGI and may guide decisions to use thrombolysis in patients with unknown times of BGI onset.

Thrombolysis With Alteplase at 0.6 mg/kg for Stroke With Unknown Time of Onset: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

We assessed whether lower-dose alteplase at 0.6 mg/kg is efficacious and safe for acute fluid-attenuated inversion recovery-negative stroke with unknown time of onset.

Is Functional Outcome Different in Posterior and Anterior Circulation Stroke?

Background and Purpose- Posterior circulation stroke (PCS) account for 20% of all ischemic strokes. There is limited evidence whether functional outcome of PCS is comparable to that of anterior circulation stroke (ACS). We aimed to analyze whether 3-month functional outcome is different in PCS and ACS. Methods- Patients with acute ischemic stroke prospectively enrolled within the Austrian Stroke Unit Registry were stratified by infarct localization according to the Oxfordshire Community Stroke Project Classification. Propensity score matching was used to control for covariate imbalances and to match patients with PCS and ACS. Patients were matched for stroke severity, recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator treatment, and demographic and vascular risk factors. Main outcomes were the distribution of modified Rankin Scale after 3 months and multiple proportional odds models to estimate the influence of the infarct localization on the functional outcome. Results- From a total of 90 484 patients enrolled within the Austrian Stroke Unit Registry, 9208 (4604 PCS/4604 ACS) were matched, of those 954 (477 in each group) were treated with recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator. We detected a significant shift towards better 3-month functional outcome in patients with ACS compared with PCS (odds ratio [OR], 1.19; 95% CI, 1.1-1.28; P<0.0001). In particular, functional outcome was worse in PCS with onset-to-door-time >270 minutes (OR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.17-1.54; P<0.0001) and in PCS with unknown onset-to-door-time (OR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.13-1.42; P<0.0001); however, we did not detect any difference in functional outcome between ACS and PCS in patients with an onset-to-door-time ≤270 minutes (1-180 minutes: OR, 0.92, 95% CI, 0.78-1.09, P=0.3554; 181-270 minutes: OR, 1.04, 95% CI, 0.79-1.37, P=0.7689). In patients treated with recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator, functional outcome was not significantly different between PCS and ACS. Conclusions- PCS was associated with worse outcome compared with ACS in patients arriving later than 4.5 hours at hospital or in those with unknown onset of symptoms. Our results urge for implementation of symptoms found in the posterior circulation into preclinical patient-triage tools.

Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous Thrombolysis in Patients with Unknown Onset Stroke: A Meta-Analysis

Objectives

Unknown onset stroke (UOS) is usually excluded from intravenous thrombolysis concerning the unclear symptom onset time. Attempts have been done to use thrombolytic therapy in these patients. The current meta-analysis was done to examine the efficacy and safety of intravenous thrombolysis in UOS.

Methods

PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were searched for studies comparing thrombolysis with conservative therapy among UOSs. Data of good outcome (mRS, 0-2), mortality, and intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) and symptomatic ICH (sICH) were extracted and analyzed using the Revman 5.2 software.

Results

In total, 8 studies with 1271 subjects (542 with thrombolysis and 729 with conservative therapy) were included in this meta-analysis. The data showed that patients receiving thrombolysis had a higher incidence of 90-day good outcome (P = 0.0005) than conservative therapy. The comparison of discharge (P = 0.89) and 90-day mortality (P = 0.10) in both groups did not find any significances. The incidences of ICH (P = 0.42) and sICH (P = 0.06) were relatively comparable between the two therapies.

Conclusions

Intravenous thrombolysis is a better choice for UOS patients for its efficacy and safety. In addition, pretreatment imaging assessment is beneficial for improving the efficacy of thrombolytic therapy. However, it needs more supporting evidences for clinical use in the future.

Artificial intelligence as an emerging technology in the current care of neurological disorders

BACKGROUND

Artificial intelligence (AI) has influenced all aspects of human life and neurology is no exception to this growing trend. The aim of this paper is to guide medical practitioners on the relevant aspects of artificial intelligence, i.e., machine learning, and deep learning, to review the development of technological advancement equipped with AI, and to elucidate how machine learning can revolutionize the management of neurological diseases. This review focuses on unsupervised aspects of machine learning, and how these aspects could be applied to precision neurology to improve patient outcomes. We have mentioned various forms of available AI, prior research, outcomes, benefits and limitations of AI, effective accessibility and future of AI, keeping the current burden of neurological disorders in mind.

DISCUSSION

The smart device system to monitor tremors and to recognize its phenotypes for better outcomes of deep brain stimulation, applications evaluating fine motor functions, AI integrated electroencephalogram learning to diagnose epilepsy and psychological non-epileptic seizure, predict outcome of seizure surgeries, recognize patterns of autonomic instability to prevent sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP), identify the pattern of complex algorithm in neuroimaging classifying cognitive impairment, differentiating and classifying concussion phenotypes, smartwatches monitoring atrial fibrillation to prevent strokes, and prediction of prognosis in dementia are unique examples of experimental utilizations of AI in the field of neurology. Though there are obvious limitations of AI, the general consensus among several nationwide studies is that this new technology has the ability to improve the prognosis of neurological disorders and as a result should become a staple in the medical community.

CONCLUSION

AI not only helps to analyze medical data in disease prevention, diagnosis, patient monitoring, and development of new protocols, but can also assist clinicians in dealing with voluminous data in a more accurate and efficient manner.

A Machine Learning Approach for Classifying Ischemic Stroke Onset Time From Imaging

Current clinical practice relies on clinical history to determine the time since stroke (TSS) onset. Imaging-based determination of acute stroke onset time could provide critical information to clinicians in deciding stroke treatment options, such as thrombolysis. The patients with unknown or unwitnessed TSS are usually excluded from thrombolysis, even if their symptoms began within the therapeutic window. In this paper, we demonstrate a machine learning approach for TSS classification using routinely acquired imaging sequences. We develop imaging features from the magnetic resonance (MR) images and train machine learning models to classify the TSS. We also propose a deep-learning model to extract hidden representations for the MR perfusion-weighted images and demonstrate classification improvement by incorporating these additional deep features. The cross-validation results show that our best classifier achieved an area under the curve of 0.765, with a sensitivity of 0.788 and a negative predictive value of 0.609, outperforming existing methods. We show that the features generated by our deep-learning algorithm correlate with the MR imaging features, and validate the robustness of the model on imaging parameter variations (e.g., year of imaging). This paper advances magnetic resonance imaging analysis one-step-closer to an operational decision support tool for stroke treatment guidance.

Emergency Neurological Life Support: Acute Ischemic Stroke

Acute ischemic stroke is a neurological emergency that can be treated with time-sensitive interventions, including both intravenous thrombolysis and endovascular approaches to thrombus removal. Extensive study has demonstrated that rapid, protocolized, assessment and treatment is essential to improving neurological outcome. For this reason, acute ischemic stroke was chosen as an emergency neurological life support protocol. The protocol focuses on the first hour of medical care following the acute onset of a neurological deficit.

Intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke: a bridge between two centuries

INTRODUCTION

Intravenous tissue-plasminogen activator (tPA) remains the only approved systemic reperfusion therapy suitable for most patients presenting timely with acute ischemic stroke. Accumulating real-word experience for over 20 years regarding tPA safety and effectiveness led to re-appraisal of original contraindications for intravenous thrombolysis (IVT). Areas covered: This narrative review focuses on fast yet appropriate selection of patients for safe administration of tPA per recently expanded indications. Novel strategies for rapid patient assessment will be discussed. The potential for mobile stroke units (MSU) that shorten onset-to-needle time and increase tPA treatment rates is addressed. The use of IVT in the era of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) is highlighted. The continuing role of IVT in large vessel occlusion (LVO) patients eligible for mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is discussed with regards to 'drip and ship' vs. 'mothership' treatment paradigms. Promising studies of penumbral imaging to extend IVT beyond the 4.5-hour window and in wake-up strokes are summarized. Expert commentary: This review provides an update on the role of IVT in specific conditions originally considered tPA contraindications. Novel practice challenges including NOAC's, MSU proliferation and bridging therapy (IVT&MT) for LVO patients, and the potential extension of IVT time-window using penumbral imaging are emerging as safe and potentially effective IVT applications.

Neuroimaging Paradigms to Identify Patients for Reperfusion Therapy in Stroke of Unknown Onset

Despite the proven efficacy of intravenous alteplase or endovascular thrombectomy for the treatment of patients with acute ischemic stroke, only a minority receive these treatments. This low treatment rate is due in large part to delay in hospital arrival or uncertainty as to the exact time of onset of ischemic stroke, which renders patients outside the current guideline-recommended window of eligibility for receiving these therapeutics. However, recent pivotal clinical trials of late-window thrombectomy now force us to rethink the value of a simplistic chronological formulation that “time is brain.” We must recognize a more nuanced concept that the rate of tissue death as a function of time is not invariant, that still salvageable tissue at risk of infarction may be present up to 24 h after last-known well, and that those patients may strongly benefit from reperfusion. Multiple studies have sought to address this clinical dilemma using neuroimaging methods to identify a radiographic time-stamp of stroke onset or evidence of salvageable ischemic tissue and thereby increase the number of patients eligible for reperfusion therapies. In this review, we provide a critical analysis of the current state of neuroimaging techniques to select patients with unwitnessed stroke for revascularization therapies and speculate on the future direction of this clinically relevant area of stroke research.

Safety and cost-effectiveness thrombolysis by diffusion-weighted imaging and fluid attenuated inversion recovery mismatch for wake-up stroke

Wake-up stroke, defined as patients who wake up with stroke symptoms which were not present prior to falling asleep, accounted for 14%-25% of acute ischemic stroke. Due to the unknown time of symptom onset, wake-up stoke was not in including criteria of intravenous thrombolysis. Several large randomized stroke trials using diffusion-weighted imaging(DWI)and fluid attenuated inversion recovery(FLAIR)mismatch patient selection may identify a subset of patients with wake-up stroke that can safely and effectively benefit from intravenous thrombolysis. In addition, economic factor was another important limitation to generalize thrombolysis treatment. Fortunately, MRI-based thrombolysis was a cost-effective treatment for wake-up stroke compared to these patients with no thrombolysis.

Intravenous thrombolysis in unwitnessed stroke onset: MR WITNESS trial results

OBJECTIVE

Most acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients with unwitnessed symptom onset are ineligible for intravenous thrombolysis due to timing alone. Lesion evolution on fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) correlates with stroke duration, and quantitative mismatch of diffusion-weighted MRI with FLAIR (qDFM) might indicate stroke duration within guideline-recommended thrombolysis. We tested whether intravenous thrombolysis ≤4.5 hours from the time of symptom discovery is safe in patients with qDFM in an open-label, phase 2a, prospective study (NCT01282242).

METHODS

Patients aged 18 to 85 years with AIS of unwitnessed onset at 4.5 to 24 hours since they were last known to be well, treatable within 4.5 hours of symptom discovery with intravenous alteplase (0.9mg/kg), and presenting with qDFM were screened across 14 hospitals. The primary outcome was the risk of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) with preplanned stopping rules. Secondary outcomes included symptomatic brain edema risk, and functional outcomes of 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS).

RESULTS

Eighty subjects were enrolled between January 31, 2011 and October 4, 2015 and treated with alteplase at median 11.2 hours (IQR = 9.5-13.3) from when they were last known to be well. There was 1 sICH (1.3%) and 3 cases of symptomatic edema (3.8%). At 90 days, 39% of subjects achieved mRS = 0-1, as did 48% of subjects who had vessel imaging and were without large vessel occlusions.

INTERPRETATION

Intravenous thrombolysis within 4.5 hours of symptom discovery in patients with unwitnessed stroke selected by qDFM, who are beyond the recommended time windows, is safe. A randomized trial testing efficacy using qDFM appears feasible and is warranted in patients without large vessel occlusions. Ann Neurol 2018;83:980-993.

About 30% of wake-up stroke patients may be candidate for the tPA therapy using Negative-FLAIR as a "tissue clock"

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Recent studies using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have reported that wake-up stroke (WUS) patients may be able to be treated using tissue-plasminogen activator (tPA) when showing no ischemia on fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (Negative-FLAIR). We investigated the frequency of WUS and calculated what percentage of WUS patients with Negative-FLAIR meets most of the conventional tPA criteria. We did not include a time parameter in this study.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with acute stroke affecting the anterior circulation who presented within 12h of onset were enrolled. All patients were examined using diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and FLAIR. As large infarctions are excluded from tPA therapy, an Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score (DWI-ASPECTS) of ≤3 was used as the upper limit for exclusion.

RESULTS

A total of 816 consecutive patients were included in the study and were separated into two groups; 163 (20%) WUS patients as the WUS group, and 653 (80%) non-WUS patients as the non-WUS group. The median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score on admission was 7 (interquartile range, 3-17) in the WUS group and 8 (3-16) in the non-WUS group (p=0.313). MRI study revealed Negative-FLAIR in 67 (41%) of 163 patients in the WUS group. Of the 67 patients with Negative-FLAIR, 19 patients were excluded from tPA therapy. Therefore, 48 (29%) of the 163 wake-up stroke patients met the tPA criteria.

CONCLUSIONS

About 30% of WUS patients may be candidates for tPA therapy based upon Negative-FLAIR findings.

The second paradigm shift occurred on acute stroke therapy

Outcome of acute stroke patients with embolic large vessel occlusion can be improved dramatically, if the effective and rapid reperfusion of the occluded vessel achieved. Since 2015, when the evidence of acute endovascular therapy established its efficacy, such scenario became no longer uncommon. Along with introduction of direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC), many options of antithrombotic therapy for acute ischemic stroke also became available. This review summarize the recent advances on acute ischemic stroke therapy.

Unclear-onset intracerebral hemorrhage: Clinical characteristics, hematoma features, and outcomes

Background and purpose Although unclear-onset ischemic stroke, including wake-up ischemic stroke, is drawing attention as a potential target for reperfusion therapy, acute unclear-onset intracerebral hemorrhage has been understudied. Clinical characteristics, hematoma features, and outcomes of patients who developed intracerebral hemorrhage during sleep or those with intracerebral hemorrhage who were unconscious when witnessed were determined. Methods Consecutive intracerebral hemorrhage patients admitted within 24 hours after onset or last-known normal time were classified into clear-onset intracerebral hemorrhage and unclear-onset intracerebral hemorrhage groups. Outcomes included initial hematoma volume, initial National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score, hematoma growth on 24-hour follow-up computed tomography, and vital and functional prognoses at 30 days. Results Of 377 studied patients (122 women, 69 ± 11 years old), 147 (39.0%) had unclear-onset intracerebral hemorrhage. Patients with unclear-onset intracerebral hemorrhage had larger hematoma volumes (p = 0.044) and higher National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores (p < 0.001) than those with clear-onset intracerebral hemorrhage after multivariable adjustment for risk factors and comorbidities. Hematoma growth was similarly common between the two groups (p = 0.176). There were fewer patients with modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores of 0-2 (p = 0.033) and more patients with mRS scores of 5-6 (p = 0.009) and with fatal outcomes (p = 0.049) in unclear-onset intracerebral hemorrhage group compared with clear-onset intracerebral hemorrhage as crude values, but not after adjustment. Conclusions Patients with unclear-onset intracerebral hemorrhage presented with larger hematomas and higher National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores at emergent visits than those with clear-onset intracerebral hemorrhage, independent of underlying characteristics. Unclear-onset intracerebral hemorrhage patients showed poorer 30-day vital and functional outcomes than clear-onset intracerebral hemorrhage patients; these differences seem to be mainly due to initial hematoma volumes and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores.

Low-dose intravenous tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischaemic stroke: an alternative or a new standard?

BACKGROUND

With the recent publication of a large clinical trial on the use of a lower dose of intravenous (IV) tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) for acute ischaemic stroke (AIS), the concept of using a different dose has been debated. We intend to review the literature on using a lower dose of IV tPA and gain a better understanding of the impact of different IV doses on the treatment of patients with AIS.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search of the related topics in PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and MEDLINE was carried out. Key words used include low dose IV tPA, thrombolysis, Alteplace and tPA for AIS. Findings were tabulated according to the size of the cohort studied, outcome, adverse event and level of evidence. The results of all studies using lower doses were analysed for efficacy and adverse events.

RESULTS

From 1992 to 2016, there were 23 trials that included 10 950 patients published on the use of lower doses of IV tPA for AIS. Doses ranged from 0.5, 0.6, 0.75 to 0.85 mg/kg. Most were observational, retrospective and registry studies. One was a prospective open-label randomised controlled trial. 13 trials combined lower doses of IV tPA with a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor or thrombectomy. Patients treated with lower doses of IV tPA showed a trend of lower rate of symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage and mortality at 3 months but slightly more disability.

CONCLUSIONS

Lower doses of IV tPA showed less haemorrhagic events but were not more effective compared with the standard dose. The optimal low dose of IV tPA remains unclear. Patients with AIS with a high risk of developing sypmtomatic intracranial haemorrhage might benefit from lower dose IV tPA, such as 0.6 mg/kg.

Update on the effects of treatment with recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator (rt-PA) in acute ischemic stroke

INTRODUCTION

Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) represents a major cause of death and disability all over the world. The recommended therapy aims at dissolving the clot to re-establish quickly the blood flow to the brain and reduce neuronal injury. Intravenous administration of recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator (rt-PA) is clinically used with this goal.

AREAS COVERED

A description of beneficial and detrimental effects of rt-PA treatment is addressed. An overview of new therapies against AIS, such as new thrombolytics, sonolysis and sonothrombolysis, endovascular procedures, and association therapies is provided. Updates on the pathophysiological process leading to intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) is also discussed.

EXPERT OPINION

rt-PA treatment in AIS patients is beneficial to recovery outcomes. To weaken risks and improve benefits, it might be relevant to consider: i) a definitive identification of risk factors for symptomatic ICH; ii). a better organization of the health care system to reduce time-to-treatment and enhance discharge management. The pharmacological improvement of new thrombolytic drugs (such as tenecteplase and desmoteplase) targeting harmful and maximally exploiting beneficial effects might further reduce mortality and disability in AIS.

Neurological Fallacies Leading to Malpractice: A Case Studies Approach

A young woman presents with an intracranial arachnoid cyst. Another is diagnosed with migraine headache. An elderly man awakens with a stroke. And a baby delivered vaginally after 2 hours of questionable electronic fetal monitoring patterns grows up to have cerebral palsy. These seemingly disparate cases share a common underlying theme: medical myths. Myths that may lead not only to misdiagnosis and treatment harms but to seemingly never-ending medical malpractice lawsuits, potentially culminating in a settlement or judgment against an unsuspecting neurologist. This article provides a case studies approach exposing the fallacies and highlighting proper management of these common neurologic presentations.

Wake-up stroke: Dawn of a new era

Wake-up stroke or stroke with unclear onset of symptoms is known to occur in one-fourth of ischemic stroke patients. These patients are not considered for thrombolytic therapy based on time designation of their symptom onset as per the current guidelines. Observational studies have investigated the pathophysiology and suggested actual onset of symptoms to be approximate to the awakening time for these patients. Use of advanced imaging modalities in these patients tends to identify favorable patient profiles for thrombolysis. Results of the ongoing trials will likely beckon a seminal juncture in stroke therapy and deliver critical modifications in the current treatment guidelines for thrombolysis in this substantial, yet neglected, group of stroke patients. In this article, we have reviewed the predisposing factors, preferred imaging modalities and various ongoing thrombolytic and endovascular trials to date for patients with unclear time of symptom onset or who wake up with stroke symptoms.

Intravenous Thrombolysis Increases the Rate of Dramatic Recovery in Patients with Acute Stroke with an Unknown Onset Time and Negative FLAIR MRI

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The safety and feasibility of intravenous thrombolysis using recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (IV-tPA) were retrospectively compared between patients with unknown onset time and no ischemia on fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (negative FLAIR) and patients receiving standard therapy.

METHODS

Acute stroke patients with unknown onset times were treated using IV-tPA if they had: negative FLAIR; internal carotid artery and/or middle cerebral artery occlusion; and a diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI)-Alberta Stroke Programme Early CT Score ≥5. All patients had abnormal DWI scans indicating an acute stroke. IV-tPA therapy was performed within 3-4.5 h of first found abnormal time (FAT). Patients who were admitted within 3-4.5 h of FAT and did not receive IV-tPA therapy despite the same imaging findings were extracted from our registry as controls.

RESULTS

There were 24 patients in the IV-tPA group and 28 in the control group. None of the IV-tPA group and 1 (4%) of the control group patients experienced symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (P = 1.000). The rate of dramatic recovery at day 7 (≥10-point reduction in the total National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale [NIHSS] score or NIHSS score of 0-1) was 46% in the IV-tPA group and 18% in the control group (P = .038). Multivariate regression analysis revealed that IV-tPA was an independent predictor of dramatic recovery at day 7 (odds ratio 13.74; 95% confidence interval, 1.95-96.92; P = .009).

CONCLUSIONS

IV-tPA may safely increase the rate of dramatic recovery in acute stroke patients with unknown onset times and negative FLAIR.

Evaluation of Cerebral Perfusion in Patients Undergoing Intravenous Recombinant Tissue Plasminogen Activator Thrombolysis

Currently, the indication for thrombolytic therapy using intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) is restricted strictly to patients with acute ischemic stroke within 4.5 h of onset. The effect of rt-PA declines over time; therefore, we need to minimize the time delay while generating imaging information. The use of cerebral blood flow imaging is not recommended within this time window. Conversely, the balance of efficacy and the risk of bleeding complications differ among patients > 4.5 h after onset. Several ongoing studies are using mismatch concepts to extend the therapeutic time window for rt-PA. Long-awaited reliable software, such as RAPID and PMA, are now available to analyze computed tomography/magnetic resonance perfusion data. Patients with wake-up stroke (WUS) are another group that can be used to expand rt-PA candidates. Diffusion fluid- attenuated inversion recovery mismatch is a promising imaging surrogate to select good candidates with WUS. These trials will cause a therapeutic paradigm shift from time-based to tissue-based strategies in the near future.

What to do With Wake-Up Stroke

Wake-up stroke, defined as the situation where a patient awakens with stroke symptoms that were not present prior to falling asleep, represents roughly 1 in 5 acute ischemic strokes and remains a therapeutic dilemma. Patients with wake-up stroke were excluded from most ischemic stroke treatment trials and are often not eligible for acute reperfusion therapy in clinical practice, leading to poor outcomes. Studies of neuroimaging with standard noncontrast computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and multimodal perfusion-based CT and MRI suggest wake-up stroke may occur shortly before awakening and may assist in selecting patients for acute reperfusion therapies. Pilot studies of wake-up stroke treatment based on these neuroimaging features are promising but have limited generalizability. Ongoing randomized treatment trials using neuroimaging-based patient selection may identify a subset of patients with wake-up stroke that can safely benefit from acute reperfusion therapies.

IV thrombolysis for treatment of patients with stroke upon awakening: Yes? No?

Current guidelines recommend IV administration of recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rtPA) to carefully selected patients who can be treated within 4.5 hours of ischemic stroke onset. Patients whose neurologic symptoms are discovered upon awakening (wake-up stroke) generally are not given rtPA because of the uncertainty about the time of stroke onset. This group of patients may be relatively large. Preliminary reports suggest that patients with wake-up stroke who can be treated within 4.5 hours of discovery may respond similarly to patients with an established time of stroke onset. Clinical trials, which are selecting patients to treat primarily based on imaging surrogates, are under way. Pending the results of these trials, data about the utility of clinical or imaging findings that would identify those patients who could be treated and information about the safety and efficacy of IV rtPA in this situation are not available.