1
|
Mubayiwa GC, Joseph B, Gilbert J, Olasoji M. Nurses' Perspectives on the Proposed Seclusion Elimination in Mental Health Wards. Int J Ment Health Nurs 2024. [PMID: 38886963 DOI: 10.1111/inm.13375] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2023] [Revised: 05/28/2024] [Accepted: 05/29/2024] [Indexed: 06/20/2024]
Abstract
Managing consumers with challenging behaviours by way of secluding them has been practiced for centuries. Many countries have attempted to eliminate seclusion but with very limited success. The Victorian government in Australia has embarked on a plan to stop seclusion within the coming 10 years. A qualitative research design using a purposive cluster sampling technique was utilised to understand nurses' perceptions on attempts to eliminate seclusions in acute wards. Semi-structured interviews and a thematic analysis were used to reveal participants' perceptions. Analysis revealed six themes: personal views, staff skills/resources, safety concerns, stakeholders' influence, doubt about elimination and participants' recommendations. Participants were doubtful of seclusion elimination success if there were no major improvements in nurse security, infrastructure, funding and staffing. Further research is required to establish and develop effective alternatives to seclusion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- George C Mubayiwa
- School of Health, Federation University, Berwick, Victoria, Australia
| | - Bindu Joseph
- School of Health, Federation University, Berwick, Victoria, Australia
| | - Julia Gilbert
- School of Health, Federation University, Berwick, Victoria, Australia
| | - Michael Olasoji
- School of Health, Federation University, Berwick, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Potiki J, Tawaroa D, Casey H, Thom K, O'Brien A, Lenagh-Glue J, Glue P. Cultural Influences on the Creation and Use of Psychiatric Advance Directives. Psychiatr Serv 2023; 74:1299-1302. [PMID: 37312506 DOI: 10.1176/appi.ps.20220565] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
Little published research exists on how culture influences mental health service users when they create or use psychiatric advance directives (PADs). This column reports the results of a study (N=38 participants) of cultural factors that might encourage New Zealand Māori who engage in mental health services to make greater use of PADs in their care. The most important factor identified was the inclusion of family and friends in decision making during PAD creation and use. Discussions revealed multiple culturally important themes that were synthesized into a conceptual model, pou herenga (mooring place), which focuses on the importance of reassessing all aspects of one's life journey when creating a PAD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johnnie Potiki
- Southern District Health Board (Potiki, Casey) and Te Āti Haunui-ā-Pāpārangi, Ngā Paerangi, Ngāti Pikiao, Ngāti Paruaharanui (Tawaroa), Dunedin, New Zealand; Centre for Non-Adversarial Justice, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand (Thom); Te Huataki Waiora School of Health, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand (O'Brien); Faculty of Law (Lenagh-Glue) and Department of Psychological Medicine (Glue), University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| | - Daniel Tawaroa
- Southern District Health Board (Potiki, Casey) and Te Āti Haunui-ā-Pāpārangi, Ngā Paerangi, Ngāti Pikiao, Ngāti Paruaharanui (Tawaroa), Dunedin, New Zealand; Centre for Non-Adversarial Justice, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand (Thom); Te Huataki Waiora School of Health, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand (O'Brien); Faculty of Law (Lenagh-Glue) and Department of Psychological Medicine (Glue), University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| | - Heather Casey
- Southern District Health Board (Potiki, Casey) and Te Āti Haunui-ā-Pāpārangi, Ngā Paerangi, Ngāti Pikiao, Ngāti Paruaharanui (Tawaroa), Dunedin, New Zealand; Centre for Non-Adversarial Justice, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand (Thom); Te Huataki Waiora School of Health, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand (O'Brien); Faculty of Law (Lenagh-Glue) and Department of Psychological Medicine (Glue), University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| | - Katey Thom
- Southern District Health Board (Potiki, Casey) and Te Āti Haunui-ā-Pāpārangi, Ngā Paerangi, Ngāti Pikiao, Ngāti Paruaharanui (Tawaroa), Dunedin, New Zealand; Centre for Non-Adversarial Justice, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand (Thom); Te Huataki Waiora School of Health, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand (O'Brien); Faculty of Law (Lenagh-Glue) and Department of Psychological Medicine (Glue), University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| | - Anthony O'Brien
- Southern District Health Board (Potiki, Casey) and Te Āti Haunui-ā-Pāpārangi, Ngā Paerangi, Ngāti Pikiao, Ngāti Paruaharanui (Tawaroa), Dunedin, New Zealand; Centre for Non-Adversarial Justice, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand (Thom); Te Huataki Waiora School of Health, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand (O'Brien); Faculty of Law (Lenagh-Glue) and Department of Psychological Medicine (Glue), University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| | - Jessie Lenagh-Glue
- Southern District Health Board (Potiki, Casey) and Te Āti Haunui-ā-Pāpārangi, Ngā Paerangi, Ngāti Pikiao, Ngāti Paruaharanui (Tawaroa), Dunedin, New Zealand; Centre for Non-Adversarial Justice, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand (Thom); Te Huataki Waiora School of Health, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand (O'Brien); Faculty of Law (Lenagh-Glue) and Department of Psychological Medicine (Glue), University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| | - Paul Glue
- Southern District Health Board (Potiki, Casey) and Te Āti Haunui-ā-Pāpārangi, Ngā Paerangi, Ngāti Pikiao, Ngāti Paruaharanui (Tawaroa), Dunedin, New Zealand; Centre for Non-Adversarial Justice, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand (Thom); Te Huataki Waiora School of Health, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand (O'Brien); Faculty of Law (Lenagh-Glue) and Department of Psychological Medicine (Glue), University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lai J, Jury A, Tuason C, Basabas MC, Swanson C, Weir-Smith K, Wharakura MK, Taurua T, Garrett N, McKenna B. Seclusion within the first 24 h following admission into inpatient mental health services and associations with referral pathways, recent service contact and HoNOS ratings. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs 2023. [PMID: 37950544 DOI: 10.1111/jpm.12999] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2022] [Revised: 10/18/2023] [Accepted: 10/24/2023] [Indexed: 11/12/2023]
Abstract
WHAT IS KNOWN ON THE SUBJECT?: Seclusion is a harmful and traumatising intervention for people accessing mental health services. People who are subject to seclusion in inpatient mental health services often first experience this within the first 24 h following admission. There is limited research examining how recent contact with services impacts the likelihood of seclusion when people are admitted to inpatient services. WHAT THE PAPER ADDS TO EXISTING KNOWLEDGE?: Males, Māori and Pasifika experience higher rates of seclusion within the first 24 h following inpatient admission. People perceived by clinicians as overactive, aggressive, disruptive or agitated are seven times more likely to be secluded within the first 24 h. People referred from police or justice services are three times more likely to be secluded within the first 24 h. People who had frequent contact with community mental health services prior to inpatient admission were less likely to be secluded. WHAT ARE THE IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE?: The first 24 h of inpatient admission is a critical focus for eliminating the use of seclusion. Initial interactions with people recently admitted should focus on nurturing relationships and reducing distress. Mental health staff should consider the person's cultural needs, referral pathway, recent service contact and baseline ratings on the Health of the Nation Outcomes Scales (HoNOS) when working proactively to prevent the use of seclusion in the first 24 h following admission. Strengthening the focus on nurturing relationships, cultural understanding and non-coercive de-escalation approaches requires leadership support and strategic workforce development. ABSTRACT: Introduction People who experience seclusion in inpatient mental health services often do so within the first 24 h following admission. There is limited research examining the potential contributing factors, particularly recent contact with services. Aim/Question To identify factors associated with seclusion within the first 24 h following admission into acute inpatient mental health services. Method A retrospective analysis was undertaken using routinely collected data from Aotearoa New Zealand mental health services. Results A higher likelihood of seclusion within the first 24 h following admission was associated with: males, Māori, Pasifika, referrals from police/justice services, inpatient transfers, recent contact with crisis assessment teams and clinician perceptions of aggression, problematic substance use, cognitive problems and hallucinations or delusions. Recent contact with community mental health services was associated with a lower likelihood. Discussion People's cultural needs, referral pathway, recent service contact and HoNOS scores should be considered when working to prevent the use of seclusion in the first 24 h following admission. Implications for Practice The first 24 h following inpatient admission is a critical period for preventing the use of seclusion. Nurturing relationships, cultural understanding and use of non-coercive de-escalation approaches can support better outcomes for people recently admitted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Tui Taurua
- Hinengaro Oranga Toa Limited, Paihia, New Zealand
- Take Notice Limited, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Nick Garrett
- Auckland University of Technology, Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Brian McKenna
- Auckland University of Technology and the Auckland Regional Forensic Psychiatry Services, Auckland, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Jewell M, Pillai K, Cavney J, Garrett N, McKenna B. Examining the need for a high level of therapeutic security at a regional forensic mental health service in Aotearoa New Zealand. PSYCHIATRY, PSYCHOLOGY, AND LAW : AN INTERDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL OF THE AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND ASSOCIATION OF PSYCHIATRY, PSYCHOLOGY AND LAW 2023; 31:293-310. [PMID: 38628253 PMCID: PMC11018087 DOI: 10.1080/13218719.2023.2192261] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2022] [Accepted: 03/05/2023] [Indexed: 04/19/2024]
Abstract
The ceiling of therapeutic security in Aotearoa New Zealand is medium security. The aim of this study is to identify and characterise a putative cohort of high-secure patients at a medium-secure regional forensic mental health service. A retrospective review of all admissions to a specific service was conducted over 3.75 years. The Dangerousness Understanding, Recovery and Urgency Manual, Triage Security Scale (DUNDRUM-1) was used to identify patients with high-secure care needs. A multiple logistic regression analysis was used to identify the local needs of this cohort. We found a significant incidence (an admission every 55 days) and prevalence (11%) of mixed-gendered and culturally diverse patients with high-secure care needs. The cohort had a high prevalence of psychosis and violent offences, and relatively short length of stay. There is also an indication that the cohort was subject to more restrictive practice. A solution is proposed to meet the needs of this cohort.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Jewell
- Auckland Regional Forensic Psychiatry Services, Auckland, Aotearoa New Zealand
| | - Krishna Pillai
- Auckland Regional Forensic Psychiatry Services, Auckland, Aotearoa New Zealand
| | - James Cavney
- Auckland Regional Forensic Psychiatry Services, Auckland, Aotearoa New Zealand
| | - Nick Garrett
- Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, Aotearoa New Zealand
| | - Brian McKenna
- Auckland Regional Forensic Psychiatry Services, Auckland, Aotearoa New Zealand
- Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, Aotearoa New Zealand
- Centre for Forensic Behavioural Science, Swinburne University of Technology, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Paradis-Gagné E, Pariseau-Legault P, Goulet MH, Jacob JD, Lessard-Deschênes C. Coercion in psychiatric and mental health nursing: A conceptual analysis. Int J Ment Health Nurs 2021; 30:590-609. [PMID: 33694266 DOI: 10.1111/inm.12855] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2020] [Revised: 01/12/2021] [Accepted: 02/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
The use of coercion in psychiatric and mental health nursing is a major challenge, which can lead to negative consequences for nurses and patients, including rupture in the therapeutic relationship and risk of injury and trauma. The concept of coercion is complex to define and is used in different ways throughout the nursing literature. This concept is defined broadly, referring to both formal (seclusion, restraint, and forced hospitalization), informal (persuasion, threat, and inducement), and perceived coercion, without fully addressing its evolving conceptualizations and use in nursing practice. We conducted a concept analysis of coercion using Rodgers' evolutionary method to identify its antecedents, attributes, and associated consequences. We identified five main attributes of the concept: different forms of coercion; the contexts in which coercion is exercised; nurses' justification of its use; the ethical issues raised by the presence of coercion; and power dynamics. Our conceptual analysis shows the need for more nursing research in the field of coercion to achieve a better understanding of the power dynamics and ethical issues that arise in the presence of coercion.
Collapse
|
6
|
Lee H, Doody O, Hennessy T. Mental health nurses experience of the introduction and practice of the Safewards model: a qualitative descriptive study. BMC Nurs 2021; 20:41. [PMID: 33706733 PMCID: PMC7953680 DOI: 10.1186/s12912-021-00554-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2020] [Accepted: 02/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND A lack of safety experienced by patients and staff in acute psychiatric units is a major concern and containment methods used to manage conflict have the potential to cause harm and upset to both staff and patients. To ensure safety for all, it is highly desirable to reduce levels of conflict and containment and the Safewards model is an evidence-based model aimed at reducing conflict and containment rates by improving nurse-patient relationships and safety. METHODS The aim of this study was to explore mental health nurses' experience of the introduction and practice of three Safewards interventions; reassurance, soft words and discharge messages. A qualitative descriptive research design utilising a purposive sample (n = 21) of registered psychiatric nurses (n = 16) and managers (n = 5) in an acute psychiatric unit in Ireland. Following a 12-week implementation of Safewards, three focus groups were conducted, two with nursing staff and one with nurse managers. Data were analysed using Braun and Clarke thematic analysis framework which supported the identification of four themes: introducing Safewards, challenges of Safewards, impact of Safewards and working towards success. RESULTS The findings indicate that the process of implementation was inadequate in the training and education of staff, and that poor support from management led to poor staff adherence and acceptance of the Safewards interventions. The reported impact of Safewards on nursing practice and patient experience were mixed. Overall, engagement and implementation under the right conditions are essential for success and while some participants perceived that the interventions already existed in practice, participants agreed Safewards enhanced their communication skills and relationships with patients. CONCLUSION The implementation of Safewards requires effective leadership and support from management, mandatory training for all staff, and the involvement of staff and patients during implementation. Future research should focus on the training and education required for successful implementation of Safewards and explore the impact of Safewards on nursing practice and patient experience.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heather Lee
- Mid-West Health Service Executive, Limerick, Ireland
| | - Owen Doody
- Department of Nursing and Midwifery, Health Research Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| | - Therese Hennessy
- Department of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Pearce A, Longhurst G. The Role of the Clinical Exercise Physiologist in Reducing the Burden of Chronic Disease in New Zealand. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2021; 18:ijerph18030859. [PMID: 33498267 PMCID: PMC7908570 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18030859] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2020] [Revised: 01/18/2021] [Accepted: 01/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Clinical exercise physiologists (CEPs) specialize in managing long-term, non-communicable health conditions using scientific rehabilitative exercise prescription, which alleviates the burden of these conditions on health care systems. This is evident, particularly in Australia (AUS), where they are registered as health care workers. CEPs have been shown to reduce the physical burden of long-term conditions on populations and the economic load that these place on national health departments. This article aims to evidence the effectiveness of CEPs in Noncommunicable Disease (NCD) rehabilitation, the cost-effectiveness of supervised exercise prescription for various NCDs by CEPs in AUS, and related cost-effectiveness New Zealand (NZ) burden of disease. This article highlights the important role NZ. CEPs can play in reducing chronic disease cost if given the same opportunities as Australian CEPs within NZ's health care system.
Collapse
|
8
|
Pariseau-Legault P, Vallée-Ouimet S, Jacob JD, Goulet MH. Intégration des droits humains dans la pratique du personnel infirmier faisant usage de coercition en santé mentale : recension systématique des écrits et méta-ethnographie. Rech Soins Infirm 2021:53-76. [PMID: 33319718 DOI: 10.3917/rsi.142.0053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
Introduction and background : The last decade has seen a steady and rising use of coercion in mental health care, as well as an increase in the number of forms it takes. The application of these measures frequently relies on the work of nurses, but few studies have analyzed the human rights issues raised by these practices.Aim : To produce a qualitative synthesis of how human rights are integrated into the practice of nurses who use coercion in mental health care.Methodology : A systematic review of qualitative scientific literature published between 2008 and 2018 was conducted and supplemented by a meta-ethnographic analysis.Results : The analysis of the forty-six selected studies revealed four distinct themes : coercion in mental health care as a socio-legal object, issues of recognition of human rights in mental health care, role conflict experienced by nurses, and the conceptualization of coercion as a necessary evil or a critical incident.Discussion and conclusion : Further research is needed to understand the specifics of the continuum of support and control that characterizes the coercive work of psychiatric nurses.
Collapse
|
9
|
Abstract
Māori are the indigenous people of Aotearoa New Zealand. European colonisation had a devastating effect on their communities and their way of life. While there is some evidence of a renaissance of Māori culture in recent years, like other indigenous people across the world, they continue to be massively overrepresented in their country's figures for poor mental and physical health. In this paper, we briefly review the literature on the Movement for Global Mental Health and review the case that has been made for the use of indigenous psychologies in place of approaches based on Western psychiatry and psychology. We present two case histories where an intervention based on an indigenous Māori approach to negotiating emotional conflicts and dealing with mental health problems was used. This approach, called Mahi a Atua, was developed by two of the authors over a number of years. We conclude that indigenous approaches to mental health offer not just an adjunct to, but a real alternative to, the interventions of Western psychiatry. They provide a framework through which individuals and families can negotiate their journeys through mental health crises and difficulties. However, such approaches can also work on a socio-cultural level to promote a positive identity for indigenous communities by celebrating the power of indigenous deities, narratives, and healing practices that were marginalised and suppressed by the forces of colonisation.
Collapse
|
10
|
Syamsudin A, Fiddaroini FN, Heru MJA. Minimizing the Use of Restraint in Patients with Mental Disorders at a Mental Hospital: A Systematic Review. JURNAL NERS 2020. [DOI: 10.20473/jn.v14i3.17147] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Restraint in the psychiatric unit is a common practice but it is very controversial and it has undergone a poor evaluation according to methodological investigations. Using restraint is a common problem and has a significant impact on patients, families and health care staff. Therefore, this systematic review will discuss the important reasons as to why restraint should be reduced. It will also explain several alternative treatments for aggressive patients in mental hospitals.Method: The database searches were used to identify potential articles: Scopus and Proquest were the focus. The search was limited to those published in the range of the last 5 years from 2013 to 2018. The keywords that were used were ‘restraint in the hospital’, ‘restraint reduction’, ‘the elimination of restraint’ and ‘physical restraint’.Result: Only 15 articles met the inclusion criteria. The results suggest that restraint is considered to be a violation of human rights and that it traumatizes the patients. It is inhuman and degrading. Besides this, restraint can result in physical complications in the form of lacerations, asphyxia, thrombosis and death. Restraint is permitted when other methods fail and in emergency conditions.Conclusion: Some of the ways to reduce the use of restraint are by constant monitoring and through the control of individual behavior, including verbal management and attitudes, reducing the environmental risks, and administering drugs. Some of the efforts to avoid restraint are the "Positive and Safe in Calderstones" program, sensory modulation and peer advice and support.
Collapse
|
11
|
Thibaut B, Dewa LH, Ramtale SC, D'Lima D, Adam S, Ashrafian H, Darzi A, Archer S. Patient safety in inpatient mental health settings: a systematic review. BMJ Open 2019; 9:e030230. [PMID: 31874869 PMCID: PMC7008434 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030230] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Patients in inpatient mental health settings face similar risks (eg, medication errors) to those in other areas of healthcare. In addition, some unsafe behaviours associated with serious mental health problems (eg, self-harm), and the measures taken to address these (eg, restraint), may result in further risks to patient safety. The objective of this review is to identify and synthesise the literature on patient safety within inpatient mental health settings using robust systematic methodology. DESIGN Systematic review and meta-synthesis. Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Health Management Information Consortium, MEDLINE, PsycINFO and Web of Science were systematically searched from 1999 to 2019. Search terms were related to 'mental health', 'patient safety', 'inpatient setting' and 'research'. Study quality was assessed using the Hawker checklist. Data were extracted and grouped based on study focus and outcome. Safety incidents were meta-analysed where possible using a random-effects model. RESULTS Of the 57 637 article titles and abstracts, 364 met inclusion criteria. Included publications came from 31 countries and included data from over 150 000 participants. Study quality varied and statistical heterogeneity was high. Ten research categories were identified: interpersonal violence, coercive interventions, safety culture, harm to self, safety of the physical environment, medication safety, unauthorised leave, clinical decision making, falls and infection prevention and control. CONCLUSIONS Patient safety in inpatient mental health settings is under-researched in comparison to other non-mental health inpatient settings. Findings demonstrate that inpatient mental health settings pose unique challenges for patient safety, which require investment in research, policy development, and translation into clinical practice. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42016034057.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bethan Thibaut
- NIHR Imperial Patient Safety Tranlsational Research Centre, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Lindsay Helen Dewa
- NIHR Imperial Patient Safety Tranlsational Research Centre, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Sonny Christian Ramtale
- NIHR Imperial Patient Safety Tranlsational Research Centre, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Danielle D'Lima
- Centre for Behaviour Change, Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Sheila Adam
- NIHR Imperial Patient Safety Tranlsational Research Centre, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Hutan Ashrafian
- NIHR Imperial Patient Safety Tranlsational Research Centre, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Ara Darzi
- NIHR Imperial Patient Safety Tranlsational Research Centre, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Stephanie Archer
- NIHR Imperial Patient Safety Tranlsational Research Centre, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Lai J, Jury A, Long J, Fergusson D, Smith M, Baxendine S, Gruar A. Variation in seclusion rates across New Zealand's specialist mental health services: Are sociodemographic and clinical factors influencing this? Int J Ment Health Nurs 2019; 28:288-296. [PMID: 30120873 DOI: 10.1111/inm.12532] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/25/2018] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
Rates of seclusion vary across New Zealand's publicly funded district health board (DHB) adult mental health inpatient services as indicated by national data. Anecdotally, this variation has been attributed to a range of factors directly relating to the people admitted to acute inpatient services. This study examined the extent to which variation in seclusion rates could be explained by the sociodemographic and clinical differences between populations admitted into adult mental health inpatient services. Retrospective data were obtained from the Programme for the Integration of Mental Health Data (PRIMHD). A logistic regression model was fitted to these data, with seclusion (yes/no) as the dependent variable and DHB groups as the independent variable. The DHBs were classified into four groups based on their seclusion rates. The model adjusted for ethnicity, age, number of bed nights, total Health of the Nation Outcome Scales (HoNOS) scores, and compulsory treatment status. Odds ratios remained virtually unchanged after adjustment for sociodemographic and clinical factors. People admitted to DHB Group 4 (highest secluding DHBs) were 11 times more likely to be secluded than people in Group 1 (lowest secluding DHBs), adjusted OR = 11.1, 95% CI [7.5,16.4], P < 0.001. Results indicate DHB variation in seclusion rates cannot be attributed to the sociodemographic and clinical factors of people admitted into DHB adult mental health inpatient services. Instead, this variation may be explained by differences in service delivery models and practice approaches. A model of system improvements aimed at reducing seclusion is discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Angela Jury
- Te Pou o te Whakaaro Nui, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Jenny Long
- Te Pou o te Whakaaro Nui, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - David Fergusson
- Department of Psychological Medicine, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Mark Smith
- Te Pou o te Whakaaro Nui, Auckland, New Zealand
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Fletcher J, Spittal M, Brophy L, Tibble H, Kinner S, Elsom S, Hamilton B. Outcomes of the Victorian Safewards trial in 13 wards: Impact on seclusion rates and fidelity measurement. Int J Ment Health Nurs 2017; 26:461-471. [PMID: 28960739 DOI: 10.1111/inm.12380] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/20/2017] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Restrictive practices are used in response to conflict and aggression in psychiatric inpatient settings. Reducing such practices is the focus internationally of policy and legislative change, many initiatives, and a growing body of research. Safewards is a model and a set of 10 interventions designed to reduce conflict and containment in inpatient services. In the current study, we aimed to assess the impact of implementing Safewards on seclusion in Victorian inpatient mental health services in Australia. The study used a before-and-after design, with a comparison group matched for service type. Thirteen wards opted into a 12-week trial to implement Safewards and 1-year follow up. The comparison group was all other wards (n = 31) with seclusion facilities in the jurisdiction, matched to service type. Mandatorily-reported seclusion event data for all 44 wards over a 15-month period were analysed using negative binomial regression. Adherence to Safewards was measured via fidelity checklists at four time points: twice during the trial, post-trial, and at 1-year follow up. Seclusion rates were reduced by 36% in Safewards trial wards by the 12-month follow-up period (incidence rate ratios (IRR) = 0.64,) but in the comparison wards seclusion rates did not differ from baseline to post-trial (IRR = 1.17) or to follow-up period (IRR = 1.35). Fidelity analysis revealed a trajectory of increased use of Safewards interventions after the trial phase to follow up. The findings suggest that Safewards is appropriate for practice change in Victorian inpatient mental health services more broadly than adult acute wards, and is effective in reducing the use of seclusion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justine Fletcher
- Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Mathew Spittal
- Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Lisa Brophy
- Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Mind Australia, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Holly Tibble
- Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Stuart Kinner
- Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Griffith Criminology Institute and Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Steve Elsom
- School of Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Bridget Hamilton
- School of Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|