1
|
The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder. J Addict Med 2024; 18:1-56. [PMID: 38669101 PMCID: PMC11105801 DOI: 10.1097/adm.0000000000001299] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/28/2024]
Abstract
The American Society of Addiction Medicine/American Academy of Addiction Psychiatry (ASAM/AAAP) Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder provides guidance on evidence-based strategies for the treatment of stimulant use disorders (StUDs), stimulant intoxication, and stimulant withdrawal, as well as secondary and tertiary prevention of harms associated with stimulant use. The Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) comprised experts from ASAM and AAAP representing a range of clinical settings and patient populations. The guideline was developed following modified GRADE methodology. The process included a systematic literature review as well as several targeted supplemental searches. The CGC utilized Evidence to Decision tables to review available evidence and rate the strength of each recommendation. The clinical practice guideline was revised based on external stakeholder review. Key takeaways included: Contingency management represents the current standard of care for treatment of StUDs; Pharmacotherapies may be utilized off-label to treat StUDs; Acute stimulant intoxication can result in life-threatening complications that should be addressed in an appropriate level of care; Secondary and tertiary prevention strategies should be used to reduce harms related to risky stimulant use.
Collapse
|
2
|
Crowther D, Curran J, Somerville M, Sinclair D, Wozney L, MacPhee S, Rose AE, Boulos L, Caudrella A. Harm reduction strategies in acute care for people who use alcohol and/or drugs: A scoping review. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0294804. [PMID: 38100469 PMCID: PMC10723714 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294804] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2022] [Accepted: 11/09/2023] [Indexed: 12/17/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND People who use alcohol and/or drugs (PWUAD) are at higher risk of infectious disease, experiencing stigma, and recurrent hospitalization. Further, they have a higher likelihood of death once hospitalized when compared to people who do not use drugs and/or alcohol. The use of harm reduction strategies within acute care settings has shown promise in alleviating some of the harms experienced by PWUAD. This review aimed to identify and synthesize evidence related to the implementation of harm reduction strategies in acute care settings. METHODS A scoping review investigating harm reduction strategies implemented in acute care settings for PWUAD was conducted. A search strategy developed by a JBI-trained specialist was used to search five databases (Medline, Embase, CINAHL, PsychInfo and Scopus). Screening of titles, abstracts and full texts, and data extraction was done in duplicate by two independent reviewers. Discrepancies were resolved by consensus or with a third reviewer. Results were reported narratively and in tables. Both patients and healthcare decision makers contributing to the development of the protocol, article screening, synthesis and feedback of results, and the identification of gaps in the literature. FINDINGS The database search identified 14,580 titles, with 59 studies included in this review. A variety of intervention modalities including pharmacological, decision support, safer consumption, early overdose detection and turning a blind eye were identified. Reported outcome measures related to safer use, managed use, and conditions of use. Reported barriers and enablers to implementation related to system and organizational factors, patient-provider communication, and patient and provider perspectives. CONCLUSION This review outlines the types of alcohol and/or drug harm reduction strategies, which have been evaluated and/or implemented in acute care settings, the type of outcome measures used in these evaluations and summarizes key barriers and enablers to implementation. This review has the potential to serve as a resource for future harm reduction evaluation and implementation efforts in the context of acute care settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Crowther
- School of Nursing, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Janet Curran
- School of Nursing, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
- Quality and Patient Safety, IWK Health, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Mari Somerville
- School of Nursing, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
- Quality and Patient Safety, IWK Health, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Doug Sinclair
- Quality and Patient Safety, IWK Health, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Lori Wozney
- Mental Health and Addictions Program, Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Shannon MacPhee
- Quality and Patient Safety, IWK Health, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | | | - Leah Boulos
- The Maritime Strategy for Patient Oriented Research SUPPORT Unit, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Alexander Caudrella
- Mental Health and Addictions Service, St Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Joyce A, Pellatt R, Ranse J, Doumany A, Hall E, Sweeny A, Keijzers G. Occupational violence in a tertiary emergency department: A retrospective descriptive study. Australas Emerg Care 2023; 26:346-351. [PMID: 37331906 DOI: 10.1016/j.auec.2023.05.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2022] [Revised: 05/10/2023] [Accepted: 05/23/2023] [Indexed: 06/20/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Occupational violence in emergency departments (EDs) impacts staff and patients. Most hospitals have a response mechanism called a 'Code Black' or similar. We aimed to determine the incidence of Code Black activations in a tertiary ED and describe contributory factors, management strategies and adverse events. METHODS Descriptive study in a tertiary ED in South-East Queensland in 2021. Adult patients for who a Code Black had been activated were eligible. Data were obtained from a prospectively collected Code Black database, supplemented with retrospective electronic medical records. RESULTS There were 386 Code Black events. The incidence of Code Black activation was 11.0 per 1000 adult ED presentations. Individuals requiring Code Black activation were 59.6 % male with a mean age of 40.9 years. The primary diagnosis was mental illness related in 55.1 %. Alcohol was a suspected factor in 30.9 %. When Code Black activation occurred, median length of stay increased. Restraint including physical, chemical or both were used in 54.1 % of Code Blacks. CONCLUSION Occupational violence occurs at a three-fold greater incidence within this ED than reported elsewhere. This study reinforces other literature suggesting an increase in occupational violence, demonstrating the need for dedicated preventative strategies for patients at risk of agitation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Joyce
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Gold Coast University Hospital, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.
| | - Richard Pellatt
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Gold Coast University Hospital, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia; LifeFlight Retrieval Medicine, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Bond University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia; School of Medicine, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
| | - Jamie Ranse
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Gold Coast University Hospital, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia; Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
| | - Amy Doumany
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Gold Coast University Hospital, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
| | - Emma Hall
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Gold Coast University Hospital, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
| | - Amy Sweeny
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Gold Coast University Hospital, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia; Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Bond University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia; School of Medicine, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
| | - Gerben Keijzers
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Gold Coast University Hospital, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia; Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Bond University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia; School of Medicine, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Fockele CE, Morse SC, van Draanen J, Leyde S, Banta-Green C, Huynh LN, Zatzick A, Whiteside LK. "That Line Just Kept Moving": Motivations and Experiences of People Who Use Methamphetamine. West J Emerg Med 2023; 24:218-227. [PMID: 36976607 PMCID: PMC10047723 DOI: 10.5811/westjem.2022.12.58396] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2022] [Accepted: 12/16/2022] [Indexed: 03/29/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Methamphetamine use is on the rise with increasing emergency department (ED) visits, behavioral health crises, and deaths associated with use and overdose. Emergency clinicians describe methamphetamine use as a significant problem with high resource utilization and violence against staff, but little is known about the patient's perspective. In this study our objective was to identify the motivations for initiation and continued methamphetamine use among people who use methamphetamine and their experiences in the ED to guide future ED-based approaches. METHODS This was a qualitative study of adults residing in the state of Washington in 2020, who used methamphetamine in the prior 30 days, met criteria for moderate- to high-risk use, reported recently receiving care in the ED, and had phone access. Twenty individuals were recruited to complete a brief survey and semi-structured interview, which was recorded and transcribed prior to being coded. Modified grounded theory guided the analysis, and the interview guide and codebook were iteratively refined. Three investigators coded the interviews until consensus was reached. Data was collected until thematic saturation. RESULTS Participants described a shifting line that separates the positive attributes from the negative consequences of using methamphetamine. Many initially used methamphetamine to enhance social interactions, combat boredom, and escape difficult circumstances by numbing the senses. However, continued use regularly led to isolation, ED visits for the medical and psychological sequelae of methamphetamine use, and engagement in increasingly risky behaviors. Because of their overwhelmingly frustrating experiences in the past, interviewees anticipated difficult interactions with healthcare clinicians, leading to combativeness in the ED, avoidance of the ED at all costs, and downstream medical complications. Participants desired a non-judgmental conversation and linkage to outpatient social resources and addiction treatment. CONCLUSION Methamphetamine use can lead patients to seek care in the ED, where they often feel stigmatized and are provided little assistance. Emergency clinicians should acknowledge addiction as a chronic condition, address acute medical and psychiatric symptoms adequately, and provide positive connections to addiction and medical resources. Future work should incorporate the perspectives of people who use methamphetamine into ED-based programs and interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Callan Elswick Fockele
- University of Washington School of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Seattle, Washington
| | - Sophie C Morse
- University of Washington School of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Seattle, Washington
| | - Jenna van Draanen
- University of Washington School of Public Health, Department of Health Systems and Population Health, Seattle, Washington
- University of Washington, Department of Child, Family, and Population Health Nursing, Seattle, Washington
| | - Sarah Leyde
- Harborview Medical Center, University of Washington, Department of Medicine, Seattle, Washington
| | - Caleb Banta-Green
- School of Public Health, University of Washington, Department of Health Services and Population Health, Seattle, Washington
- University of Washington School of Medicine, Addictions, Drug & Alcohol Institute, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Seattle, Washington
| | - Ly Ngoc Huynh
- University of Washington School of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Seattle, Washington
| | - Alina Zatzick
- University of Washington School of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Seattle, Washington
| | - Lauren K Whiteside
- University of Washington School of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Seattle, Washington
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Muacevic A, Adler JR. Rates and Patterns of Australian Emergency Department Presentations of People Who Use Stimulants: A Systematic Literature Review. Cureus 2022; 14:e30429. [PMID: 36407224 PMCID: PMC9671087 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.30429] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/18/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
The use of illicit stimulants continues to pose a significant challenge to different health sectors. In Australia, four particular stimulants, namely amphetamines and their derivatives, methamphetamine, ecstasy or 3,4-methylenedioxy-methamphetamine (MDMA), and cocaine cause a significant challenge to EDs as managing patients who use stimulants can be labor and resource intensive. While Australian data are available for stimulant-related ambulance attendances and hospitalizations, little is known about ED presentations of people who use stimulants. The aim of this paper is to systematically review the available literature related to the rates and patterns of ED presentations of people who use stimulants in Australia. A search was conducted on EBSCOhost, CINAHL Complete, and PubMed databases, as well as Google Scholar. Search terms consisted of combinations of the following terms: 1) stimulant AND ED AND Australia; 2) stimulants AND emergency presentations OR accident and emergency AND Australia, 3) amphetamine OR methamphetamine OR ecstasy OR cocaine AND ED AND Australia. Articles that met the inclusion criteria were included in the review and subjected to a quality appraisal. Data were extracted from the selected papers, including patient demographics, presentation rates, type of stimulant, reasons for presentations, police or ambulance service involvement, comorbidities, mental health issues, triage codes, admissions, and separations. The results of the review are reported using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Studies were eligible if they were English-language peer-reviewed articles published between January 2011 and December 2021 and if they included data on Australian ED presentations of people who use non-prescription illicit stimulants. Studies were excluded if they did not include stimulant-related ED presentations or focused on ED presentations related to prescription stimulants, including Ritalin and Adderall, non-stimulant drugs, or caffeine for attention deficit disorder (ADD) or attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). The selected articles were appraised for quality, rigor, and risk of bias by two authors. The studies were assessed using the Newcastle Ottawa Scale (NOS) for cross-sectional, cohort, and case-control studies depending on the methodology identified in the study. A total of 19 articles were included in this study. Males represented 53 to 85% of ED presentations of people who use stimulants with an age range of 0 to 65 and are more likely to be transported by police or ambulance. People who use stimulants presented to EDs with varying psychological and behavioral concerns such as psychosis, self-harm, suicidal ideations, hallucinations, agitations, and aggressiveness, as well as medical conditions, including heart palpitations, nausea and vomiting, and significant physical injuries.
Collapse
|
6
|
Knott J, Yap C, Mitra B, Gerdtz M, Daniel C, Braitberg G. Screening major trauma patients for prevalence of illicit drugs. Drug Alcohol Rev 2021; 41:285-292. [PMID: 34263497 DOI: 10.1111/dar.13355] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2021] [Revised: 06/21/2021] [Accepted: 06/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Australasian emergency departments (ED) routinely test patient alcohol levels following major trauma, but assessment for illicit drugs is uncommon. METHODS A prospective cross-sectional study of major motor-vehicle-related trauma patients attending both adult major trauma centres in Victoria, Australia. All eligible patients had point-of-care saliva testing to determine the prevalence of common illicit drugs. RESULTS Over 12 months, 1411 patients were screened, 36 refused (2.6%) and 63 were excluded. Of the final 1312 cases included, 173 (13.2%; 95% confidence interval 11.5, 15.1) tested positive to at least one illicit substance, with 133 (76.9%; 69.7, 82.8) positive for meth/amphetamines. One in five had more than one illicit substance detected. Patients testing positive were most frequently in motor vehicles (91.9% vs. 85.6%) and least frequently cyclists (2.3% vs. 4.2%) or pedestrians (5.2% vs. 10.3%), compared to those testing negative. They were younger (mean age 35.4 vs. 43.1 years), more likely to arrive overnight (27.2% vs. 12.1%) or after single vehicle crashes (54.3% vs. 42.3%). Although the initial disposition from ED did not differ, those testing positive were more likely to re-present within 28 days (13.9% vs. 5.4%). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS A high prevalence of potentially illicit substances among patients presenting with suspected major trauma supports the need for urgent preventive strategies. The low rate of patient refusal and large numbers screened by ED staff suggests that point-of care testing for illicit substances in major trauma is acceptable and feasible. This study and ongoing surveillance may be used to inform driver education strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan Knott
- Emergency Department, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Celene Yap
- Department of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Biswadev Mitra
- Emergency Department, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Marie Gerdtz
- Department of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Catherine Daniel
- Department of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - George Braitberg
- Department of Medicine, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Daniel C, Mukaro V, Yap CYL, C Knott J, Kelly P, Innes A, Braitberg G, Gerdtz M. Characteristics and clinical outcomes for mental health patients admitted to a behavioural assessment unit: Implications for model of care and practice. Int J Ment Health Nurs 2021; 30:249-260. [PMID: 32929864 DOI: 10.1111/inm.12779] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2020] [Revised: 07/15/2020] [Accepted: 08/04/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Behavioural assessment units (BAU) have been established in emergency departments (EDs) to provide short-term observation, treatment, and care to people experiencing acute behavioural disturbance. A prospective observational study was conducted in a cohort of adult patients admitted to one BAU located within an ED (July-December 2017) to compare clinical characteristics, treatment outcomes, and use of restrictive interventions for those who received a specialist mental health (MH) assessment with those who did not. Of the 457 patients, 61.5% received a specialist MH assessment. This group had a lower acuity (Australasian Triage Score 10.4%; CI 0.2-2.0% vs 13.6%; CI 9.3-19.5%); more arrived with police (28.8%; CI 23.8-34.3 vs 5.1%; CI 2.7-9.4%); and were subjected to restrictive interventions while in the BAU. Security responses for unarmed threat (code grey) were higher (10.9%; CI 7.8-15.0% vs 4.4%; CI 2.3-8.5%), as was the use of chemical restraint (4.2%; CI 2.4-7.2 vs 0.0% CI 0.0 - 2.1%). Those requiring specialist MH assessment had a longer length of stay (12.7 vs 5.2 hours). Further development of the BAU model of care must include targeted, evidence-based strategies to minimize the use of restrictive interventions and ensure timely access to acute mental health services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine Daniel
- Department of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Melbourne Health, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.,Centre for Integrated Critical Care, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Violet Mukaro
- Centre for Integrated Critical Care, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Celene Y L Yap
- Department of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Emergency Department, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.,Centre for Integrated Critical Care, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jonathan C Knott
- Emergency Department, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.,Melbourne Health, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.,Centre for Integrated Critical Care, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Peter Kelly
- Melbourne Health, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Andrew Innes
- Emergency Department, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - George Braitberg
- Melbourne Health, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.,Centre for Integrated Critical Care, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Marie Gerdtz
- Department of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|