• Reference Citation Analysis
  • v
  • v
  • Find an Article
Find an Article PDF (4604544)   Today's Articles (5405)   Subscriber (49371)
For: Seither-Preisler A, Krumbholz K, Patterson R, Seither S, Lütkenhöner B. Interaction between the neuromagnetic responses to sound energy onset and pitch onset suggests common generators. Eur J Neurosci 2004;19:3073-80. [PMID: 15182315 DOI: 10.1111/j.0953-816x.2004.03423.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Number Cited by Other Article(s)
1
Schneider P, Groß C, Bernhofs V, Christiner M, Benner J, Turker S, Zeidler BM, Seither‐Preisler A. Short-term plasticity of neuro-auditory processing induced by musical active listening training. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2022;1517:176-190. [PMID: 36114664 PMCID: PMC9826140 DOI: 10.1111/nyas.14899] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
2
Richardson ML, Guérit F, Gransier R, Wouters J, Carlyon RP, Middlebrooks JC. Temporal Pitch Sensitivity in an Animal Model: Psychophysics and Scalp Recordings : Temporal Pitch Sensitivity in Cat. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2022;23:491-512. [PMID: 35668206 PMCID: PMC9437162 DOI: 10.1007/s10162-022-00849-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2021] [Accepted: 04/11/2022] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]  Open
3
Samareh A, Jin Y, Wang Z, Chang X, Huang S. Detect depression from communication: how computer vision, signal processing, and sentiment analysis join forces. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2018. [DOI: 10.1080/24725579.2018.1496494] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
4
Zhang X, Gong Q, Zhang T. Cortical auditory evoked potentials (CAEPs) represent neural cues relevant to pitch perception. ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY. IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY. ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE 2016;2016:1628-1631. [PMID: 28268641 DOI: 10.1109/embc.2016.7591025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
5
Krishnan A, Gandour JT, Ananthakrishnan S, Vijayaraghavan V. Cortical pitch response components index stimulus onset/offset and dynamic features of pitch contours. Neuropsychologia 2014;59:1-12. [PMID: 24751993 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.04.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2013] [Revised: 03/12/2014] [Accepted: 04/11/2014] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
6
Edmonds BA, Krumbholz K. Are interaural time and level differences represented by independent or integrated codes in the human auditory cortex? J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2013;15:103-14. [PMID: 24218332 PMCID: PMC3901864 DOI: 10.1007/s10162-013-0421-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2013] [Accepted: 10/07/2013] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]  Open
7
Barker D, Plack CJ, Hall DA. Representations of pitch and slow modulation in auditory cortex. Front Syst Neurosci 2013;7:62. [PMID: 24106464 PMCID: PMC3788350 DOI: 10.3389/fnsys.2013.00062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2013] [Accepted: 09/13/2013] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]  Open
8
McMullan AR, Hambrook DA, Tata MS. Brain dynamics encode the spectrotemporal boundaries of auditory objects. Hear Res 2013;304:77-90. [DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2013.06.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2013] [Revised: 06/14/2013] [Accepted: 06/24/2013] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
9
Plack CJ, Barker D, Hall DA. Pitch coding and pitch processing in the human brain. Hear Res 2013;307:53-64. [PMID: 23938209 DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2013.07.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2013] [Revised: 07/15/2013] [Accepted: 07/31/2013] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
10
Zhang C, Peng G, Wang WSY. Achieving constancy in spoken word identification: time course of talker normalization. BRAIN AND LANGUAGE 2013;126:193-202. [PMID: 23792769 DOI: 10.1016/j.bandl.2013.05.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2012] [Revised: 04/19/2013] [Accepted: 05/20/2013] [Indexed: 06/02/2023]
11
Soeta Y, Nakagawa S. Auditory evoked responses in human auditory cortex to the variation of sound intensity in an ongoing tone. Hear Res 2012;287:67-75. [DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2012.03.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2011] [Revised: 03/08/2012] [Accepted: 03/16/2012] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
12
Yrttiaho S, May PJC, Tiitinen H, Alku P. Cortical encoding of aperiodic and periodic speech sounds: evidence for distinct neural populations. Neuroimage 2011;55:1252-9. [PMID: 21215807 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.12.076] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2010] [Revised: 12/01/2010] [Accepted: 12/28/2010] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]  Open
13
Butcher A, Govenlock SW, Tata MS. A lateralized auditory evoked potential elicited when auditory objects are defined by spatial motion. Hear Res 2011;272:58-68. [DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2010.10.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2010] [Revised: 10/21/2010] [Accepted: 10/28/2010] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
14
Lütkenhöner B, Seither-Preisler A, Krumbholz K, Patterson RD. Auditory cortex tracks the temporal regularity of sustained noisy sounds. Hear Res 2010;272:85-94. [PMID: 21073933 DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2010.10.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2009] [Revised: 09/18/2010] [Accepted: 10/26/2010] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
15
Garcia D, Hall DA, Plack CJ. The effect of stimulus context on pitch representations in the human auditory cortex. Neuroimage 2010;51:808-16. [PMID: 20211739 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.02.079] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2009] [Revised: 02/06/2010] [Accepted: 02/26/2010] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]  Open
16
Sound level-dependent growth of N1m amplitude with low and high-frequency tones. Neuroreport 2009;20:548-52. [PMID: 19319005 DOI: 10.1097/wnr.0b013e32832a6f15] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
17
Soeta Y, Nakagawa S. The effects of pitch and pitch strength on an auditory-evoked N1m. Neuroreport 2008;19:783-7. [PMID: 18418257 DOI: 10.1097/wnr.0b013e3282fe2085] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
18
Chait M, Poeppel D, Simon JZ. Auditory temporal edge detection in human auditory cortex. Brain Res 2008;1213:78-90. [PMID: 18455707 DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.03.050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2007] [Revised: 02/24/2008] [Accepted: 03/15/2008] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
19
Seither-Preisler A, Johnson L, Krumbholz K, Nobbe A, Patterson R, Seither S, Lütkenhöner B. Tone sequences with conflicting fundamental pitch and timbre changes are heard differently by musicians and nonmusicians. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 2007;33:743-51. [PMID: 17563235 PMCID: PMC2821799 DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.33.3.743] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
20
Chait M, Poeppel D, Simon JZ. Stimulus Context Affects Auditory Cortical Responses to Changes in Interaural Correlation. J Neurophysiol 2007;98:224-31. [PMID: 17493921 DOI: 10.1152/jn.00359.2007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]  Open
21
Hall DA, Plack CJ. The human 'pitch center' responds differently to iterated noise and Huggins pitch. Neuroreport 2007;18:323-7. [PMID: 17435596 DOI: 10.1097/wnr.0b013e32802b70ce] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
22
Jones SJ. Cortical processing of quasi-periodic versus random noise sounds. Hear Res 2006;221:65-72. [PMID: 16963209 DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2006.06.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2005] [Revised: 06/21/2006] [Accepted: 06/30/2006] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
23
Seither-Preisler A, Patterson RD, Krumbholz K, Seither S, Lütkenhöner B. From noise to pitch: transient and sustained responses of the auditory evoked field. Hear Res 2006;218:50-63. [PMID: 16814971 DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2006.04.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2006] [Revised: 04/22/2006] [Accepted: 04/27/2006] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
24
Seither-Preisler A, Patterson R, Krumbholz K, Seither S, Lütkenhöner B. Evidence of pitch processing in the N100m component of the auditory evoked field. Hear Res 2006;213:88-98. [PMID: 16464550 DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2006.01.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2005] [Revised: 12/23/2005] [Accepted: 01/02/2006] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
25
Ritter S, Günter Dosch H, Specht HJ, Rupp A. Neuromagnetic responses reflect the temporal pitch change of regular interval sounds. Neuroimage 2005;27:533-43. [PMID: 15964207 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.05.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2004] [Revised: 02/11/2005] [Accepted: 05/02/2005] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]  Open
26
Chait M, Poeppel D, Simon JZ. Neural response correlates of detection of monaurally and binaurally created pitches in humans. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2005;16:835-48. [PMID: 16151180 DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhj027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 69] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
27
Soeta Y, Nakagawa S, Tonoike M. Auditory evoked magnetic fields in relation to iterated rippled noise. Hear Res 2005;205:256-61. [PMID: 15953534 DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2005.03.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2005] [Accepted: 03/26/2005] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
28
Hertrich I, Mathiak K, Menning H, Lutzenberger W, Ackermann H. MEG responses to rippled noise and Huggins pitch reveal similar cortical representations. Neuroreport 2005;16:193-6. [PMID: 15671876 DOI: 10.1097/00001756-200502080-00026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
PrevPage 1 of 1 1Next
© 2004-2024 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA