Arterial blood pressure and general sympathetic activation in essential hypertension during stimulation

Physiological reactivity to acute mental stress in essential hypertension-a systematic review

Objective

Exaggerated physiological reactions to acute mental stress (AMS) are associated with hypertension (development) and have been proposed to play an important role in mediating the cardiovascular disease risk with hypertension. A variety of studies compared physiological reactivity to AMS between essential hypertensive (HT) and normotensive (NT) individuals. However, a systematic review of studies across stress-reactive physiological systems including intermediate biological risk factors for cardiovascular diseases is lacking.

Methods

We conducted a systematic literature search (PubMed) for original articles and short reports, published in English language in peer-reviewed journals in November and December 2022. We targeted studies comparing the reactivity between essential HT and NT to AMS in terms of cognitive tasks, public speaking tasks, or the combination of both, in at least one of the predefined stress-reactive physiological systems.

Results

We included a total of 58 publications. The majority of studies investigated physiological reactivity to mental stressors of mild or moderate intensity. Whereas HT seem to exhibit increased reactivity in response to mild or moderate AMS only under certain conditions (i.e., in response to mild mental stressors with specific characteristics, in an early hyperkinetic stage of HT, or with respect to certain stress systems), increased physiological reactivity in HT as compared to NT to AMS of strong intensity was observed across all investigated stress-reactive physiological systems.

Conclusion

Overall, this systematic review supports the proposed and expected generalized physiological hyperreactivity to AMS with essential hypertension, in particular to strong mental stress. Moreover, we discuss potential underlying mechanisms and highlight open questions for future research of importance for the comprehensive understanding of the observed hyperreactivity to AMS in essential hypertension.

Blood pressure and pulse responses to three stressors: associations with sociodemographic characteristics and cardiovascular risk factors

Cardiovascular reactivity is hypothesized to increase the risk of hypertension and other CVD-related conditions. However, studies to date are inconclusive. We compared the association of blood pressure and pulse responses to three stressors (postural challenge, handgrip test, mental arithmetic) with sociodemographic characteristics and CVD risk factors. We included 782 participants from the Hypertension Genetic Epidemiology Study. Blood pressure and pulse responses to stressors were defined as the difference between post- and pre-stress measurements. Stepwise regression analyses examined change in SBP and pulse in response to stressors as a function of sociodemographic and CVD risk factors. Age, race, and gender were forced into models and other variables (education, BMI, waist circumference, resting SBP and DBP, cigarette smoking, LDL and HDL cholesterol, glucose, and antihypertensive medications (beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers, diuretics, ace inhibitors)) were retained if P<0.10. Age was a significant predictor of SBP response to all stressors. The SBP response to a change in posture was not related to other variables. The SBP response to mental arithmetic was significantly higher among men, those with larger waists, higher SBP, beta-blocker users, and lower among smokers. SBP response to the handgrip was significantly higher among those with higher SBP and beta-blocker users. Similarly, the association of the pulse response to the risk factors varied considerably across the stressors. Overall, the socio-demographic and CVD risk factors accounted for between 9 and 14% of the variance in the SBP response to the stressors and from between 4 and 12% of the variance in the pulse response to the three stressors. The associations between sociodemographic and CVD risk factors and the SBP and pulse response to stress were modest and inconsistent across stressors. The findings suggest that cardiovascular reactivity is a concept that needs to be defined in reference to specific stressors so that mechanisms leading to responses can be better understood.

An historical context for behavioral models of hypertension

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study is provide an historical context for current behavioral models of hypertension.

METHODS

A selective sample of the cardiovascular reactivity literature was reviewed, from 1932 to present.

RESULTS

In the earliest model, cardiovascular reactivity was regarded as a marker of disease risk; however, in later models, reactivity came to be viewed as a causal influence in the development of hypertension. As the models evolved, the underlying assumptions changed. Thus, the risk marker model assumed that cardiovascular responses to stress were a stable, generalized characteristic of the individual, and therefore the eliciting stimuli were arbitrary. The later models, however, assume that the nature of the eliciting stimulus is a determinant of the cardiovascular response. We describe the increasing complexity of the four models, and contrast their underlying assumptions and the implications of these assumptions.

CONCLUSION

We provide an overview of study designs and variables that should be incorporated into studies seeking to understand the ways in which cardiovascular responses to stress may influence the development of hypertension.

A case for the usefulness of laboratory social stressors

Although laboratory stress research is a popular and vibrant area of research activity, there is surprisingly little evidence that laboratory stress models are clinically useful (i.e. that they can explain and predict the development of disease). This article summarizes evidence that the usefulness of lab stress research can be improved with the use of social stressors. Two lines of evidence are presented in support of this argument: (a) studies comparing physiological reactivity to different lab stressors with ambulatory activity, and (b) a meta-analysis of investigations of cortisol responses to laboratory stressors. Further issues of importance in understanding social stressors are gender differences and the vulnerability (i.e. weak reliability) of social stressor impact to relatively small changes in the experimental protocol itself.

Electrodermal lability and hypertension

Thirty-nine (39) middle-aged subjects with mild to moderate hypertension (WHO stages I-II) and 35 healthy normotensive controls from a community sample participated in this psychophysiological study, the aim of which was to study whether the electrodermal lability as an indicator of increased sympathetic activity is related to hypertension. Resting blood pressure was measured by using a mercury sphygmomanometer. Electrodermal activity was recorded with a constant voltage circuit. Bipolar skin electrodes were placed on the palmar side of the middle phalanges of the index and middle fingers of both hands. Six years after the electrodermal measurements, the possible use of reimbursed antihypertensive medication was checked in both groups, and blood pressure re-measured in the control group. Multivariate analysis controlling for age, gender and body mass showed that the electrodermal lability was increased in the hypertensive as compared to the normotensive group. This supports the hypothesis that the sympathetic nervous system tonus is increased at least, in some middle-aged subjects with mild to moderate hypertension.

Laboratory reactivity models as predictors of ambulatory blood pressure and heart rate

We attempted to validate the usefulness of the laboratory reactivity paradigm by examining responses to three distinct lab tasks and an overall lab average as predictors for ambulatory blood pressure. Subjects were 126 university students. We assessed ambulatory blood pressure, heart rate and perceived distress during an 8-hr working day. In the lab, all subjects responded to three standardized 5-min tasks: isometric handgrip, mental arithmetic, and a structured discussion of a recent interpersonal conflict situation. The analyses used absolute task levels, change scores, a composite index of reactivity, and a mean value for all obtained lab measures. Task levels correlated significantly with means of the ambulatory cardiovascular indices; the scores ranged from 0.35 to 0.49 for SBP, from 0.45 to 0.58 for DBP, and from 0.57 to 0.65 for HR. Only the DBP change score associated with the discussion task correlated with the ambulatory mean. The correlations between lab task levels and ambulatory measures were strongest for the discussion task and the composite score; the task level for the math task was consistently the weakest predictor of ambulatory activity. When lab resting values were forced into a step-wise multiple regression as step one, only the response to the discussion added significantly (3% each for SBP and DBP) to the variance in ambulatory pressure that was not already explained by resting values. The overall lab mean for SBP was a better predictor of the ambulatory mean than was any combination of resting values and reactivity indices.

Cardiovascular reactivity, coronary risk factors, and sympathetic activity in young men

We have previously demonstrated that awareness of high blood pressure may increase blood pressure, plasma catecholamine levels, and stress responses. In the present study, three groups of 19-year-old men, all unaware of their blood pressure status, were selected from the first (group-1, 62 +/- 2 mm Hg, [mean +/- SEM], n = 15), 50th (group-50, 90 +/- 4 mm Hg, n = 15), and 99th (group-99, 123 +/- 5 mm Hg, n = 14) percentiles in causal mean blood pressure at a screening. They were studied (blinded examiners) with intra-arterial blood pressure recordings and multiple measurements of arterial plasma epinephrine and norepinephrine during a mental arithmetic challenge and cold pressor test. Despite high mean blood pressure at the screening, group-99 did not differ from group-50 either in intra-arterial mean blood pressure after 30 minutes of supine rest (89 +/- 3 versus 86 +/- 2 mm Hg) or in serum lipids and resting plasma epinephrine and norepinephrine. However, in group-99 resting plasma epinephrine showed a positive hyperbolic relation to resting diastolic blood pressure (r = .73, P = .004) and a negative hyperbolic relation to the ratio of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol to total cholesterol (r = -.75, P = .002). None of these correlations were present in the two other groups. Furthermore, the three groups differed in heart rate responses (P < .0005) and systolic (P < .0005) and diastolic (P < .05) blood pressure responses to mental arithmetic challenge, group-99 being hyperreactive compared with the other two groups.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Family history of hypertension and cardiovascular changes during high and low affect provocation

The present study investigated whether subjects with a positive family history of hypertension would display differential responses in blood pressure and heart rate across different laboratory tasks. We also wanted to know whether subjects would display stable within-subject responses across different laboratory tasks. Twenty-three family history positive subjects and 23 with a negative family history participated in three tasks: 1) mental arithmetic, 2) a conversation about the weather (low affect task), and 3) a conversation about a recent upsetting, interpersonal event (high affect task). Positive family history was associated with elevated diastolic resting blood pressure and greater diastolic responsivity overall. For both groups, arithmetic was associated with the greatest heart rate changes, whereas the distressing conversation was accompanied by the greatest diastolic blood pressure response. Stability of cardiovascular activation across different tasks was present only for heart rate; it was weak for diastolic blood pressure, and completely absent for systolic blood pressure.

Neuroendocrine and cardiovascular stress reactivity in middle-aged normotensive adults with parental history of cardiovascular disease

Neuroendocrine and cardiovascular stress reactivity was studied in healthy middle-aged individuals whose parental history included essential hypertension and/or myocardial infarction and a control group without parental history of cardiovascular disease. All subjects completed a rest session (1 hour) and a stress session (1 hour). The stress session included behavioral (mirror image tracing, mental arithmetic, and the Stroop color word conflict test) and physical stressors (the cold pressor test and isometric exercise). Systolic and diastolic blood pressures and heart rate were recorded at baseline before and during all stressors. Specimens for determination of urinary catecholamines and cortisol were sampled after the rest and stress sessions respectively. Generally, a parental history of hypertension but not of myocardial infarction influenced neuroendocrine and cardiovascular stress reactivity. A family history of hypertension was associated with exaggerated epinephrine, norepinephrine, and cortisol excretion during stress and with enhanced heart-rate reactivity to behavioral (mental arithmetic and mirror image tracing) but not to physical stressors (isometric exercise or the cold pressor test). We conclude that individuals with a family history of hypertension tend to display exaggerated cardiovascular and neuroendocrine reactivity to stress.

Psychophysiological theories on sympathetic nervous system reactivity in the development of essential hypertension

Psychophysiological theories on the development of essential hypertension are reviewed and evaluated. Two interconnected theories that relate behavior to essential hypertension and account for individual differences in susceptibility to disease are the "hyperreactivity" theory and "the symptom specificity" theory. The "hyperreactivity" theory identifies individual differences in autonomic nervous system reactivity as the pathophysiological mechanism and the "symptom specificity" theory suggests that inflexible, stereotypical responding increases the risk to develop hypertension. Based on a literature review, these theories are examined. There exist both case/control and prospective studies on autonomic nervous system reactivity and the development of hypertension. It is concluded that a neurogenically mediated hyperreactivity to stress is a precursor and not an effect of hypertension. Tasks that call for active but not passive coping efforts are more efficient elicitors of reactivity differences between those at high and low risk to develop hypertension in case/control studies. In prospective studies, active tasks may also have a predictive advantage over passive with respect to blood pressure development. In the early phase of hypertension, an increased cardiovascular reactivity is accompanied by increased neuroendocrine activation. In the later phase, heightened reactivity is confined to the cardiovascular system. This does not prove but is consistent with the notion that transient episodes of increased cardiac output translate into essential hypertension by causing vascular hypertrophy. Case/control studies suggest that an increased "symptom specificity", with stereotypical responding across multiple stressors, is independent of cardiovascular reactivity and a precursor of hypertension. The literature lacks prospective studies on the clinical relevance of stereotypical responding. It is suggested that the presence of both hyperreactivity and symptom specificity in a single individual increases the risk to develop essential hypertension.

Generalization of cardiovascular response: supportive evidence for the reactivity hypothesis

Cardiovascular responses were monitored while 36 subjects completed a battery of laboratory stressors comprising mental arithmetic, a reaction time task, a speech task, and the forehead cold pressor. Inter-task consistency was assessed for each of 6 physiological parameters for all task pairings. Considerable inter-task consistency for reactivity scores was seen among the psychological stressors for all variables. The question of such consistency between the cold pressor and the psychological tasks was then addressed. The pattern of consistency was not as clear-cut in this case. For systolic blood pressure and pre-ejection period, reactivity scores to the cold pressor did not correlate with those to any of the psychological tasks. In contrast, cardiac output and total peripheral resistance responses showed considerable consistency. The importance of determining the nature of the relationship between psychological and physical stressors is discussed.

Exaggerated sympathetic nervous system response to extended psychological stress in offspring of hypertensives

The cardiovascular responses of 24 healthy young adult males with a parental history of hypertension and 24 males without a parental history of hypertension to an extended active-coping psychological stressor were compared under three drug conditions: placebo, the beta 1-blocking agent metoprolol, and the alpha 1-blocking agent prazosin. In the placebo condition, offspring of hypertensives exhibited significantly greater heart rate, blood volume pulse, and forearm blood flow responses to the task. They also exhibited a significantly greater initial decrease in forearm vascular resistance, which, in contrast to the offspring of normotensives, was no longer significantly different from baseline levels by the end of the session. No group differences in blood pressure response were observed. Metoprolol eliminated the differences in heart rate and forearm vascular resistance responses. Prazosin eliminated the difference in blood volume pulse response and elicited a sustained group difference in forearm vascular resistance. These results implicate the sympathetic nervous system in the exaggerated cardiovascular responsivity to psychological stress in individuals with a family history of essential hypertension. They also suggest that the pattern of increasing vascular resistance in response to this stressor observed in this and other studies in this laboratory reflects alpha-adrenergic activity and not neurohumorally independent autoregulation.

The effects of muscle tension on cerebral circulation in blood-phobic and non-phobic subjects

This study aimed to assess whether (1) a muscle tensing procedure which has been found to be useful in the treatment of blood-phobic patients produces an increase in heart rate and cerebral blood flow and (2) whether this increase is greater than that produced by mental effort alone. Subjects were 17 volunteers with a history of fainting in response to blood-injury stimuli, (12 were phobic) and 8 volunteers with no fainting history. They were required to (a) rest, (b) do mental arithmetic, and (c) repeatedly tense and release their arm and leg muscles. It was found that Ss, heart rate and cerebral blood flow velocity were significantly greater during the muscle tensing procedure than during mental arithmetic or resting conditions. The increased cerebral blood flow produced by muscle tensing may enable blood phobic patients to prevent fainting during exposure treatment.

Cardiovascular responses in the laboratory and in the natural environment: is blood pressure reactivity to laboratory-induced mental stress related to ambulatory blood pressure during everyday life?

Cardiovascular activity recorded at rest and during mental stress in the laboratory was studied in relation to ambulatory recorded cardiovascular activity at work and at home. Fifty-five Type A men (M = 42.4 years) underwent a standardized laboratory mental stress protocol in which systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, and heart rate were recorded at baseline and during a 15 min mental arithmetic task (MAT). On a subsequent day, ambulatory blood pressure and heart rate were recorded at 20 minute intervals for 12-14 hr during normal activities at home and at work. Subjects completed a behavioral diary concurrently with each cuff inflation. High and Low groups were identified based upon a median split of their cardiovascular response levels at baseline and during the MAT. Subjects with high systolic blood pressure levels during the MAT had high systolic blood pressure at home, at work, during physical activity, and when they reported being 'stressed'. Baseline systolic blood pressure in the laboratory was less consistently related to ambulatory systolic pressure across ambulatory conditions. Diastolic blood pressure at baseline was related to ambulatory diastolic blood pressure at work, at home, and when resting. Diastolic blood pressure during the MAT was associated with higher diastolic pressure at work and at home. Heart rate at baseline and during the MAT was related to heart rate at work and during physical activity. Change scores derived by subtracting mean values during the MAT from baseline resting levels were not associated with ambulatory blood pressures or heart rates under any daily conditions. In the best case, systolic blood pressure measured during the MAT was related to systolic blood pressure during physical activity, to systolic blood pressure and heart rate during mental stress, to systolic and diastolic blood pressure at rest, and to systolic blood pressure and heart rate at work but not at home. We conclude that levels of blood pressure and heart rate measured in the laboratory, but not reactivity (i.e, change scores) during the MAT, are related to blood pressure and heart rate levels recorded in the natural environment, especially in the work setting.

Cardiovascular and electrodermal adjustments during a vigilance task in patients with borderline and established hypertension

We studied cardiovascular and noncardiovascular sympathetic nervous system (SNS) responses to a vigilance task in patients with borderline (BT) or established hypertension (HT). Twelve patients in each group and twelve normotensive controls (NT) were subjected to a signalled reaction-time (RT) task which included the presentation of a noxious 110 dB white noise contingent upon RT-performance at the end of a 30 sec foreperiod. During this foreperiod recordings were made of: systolic and diastolic blood pressures, heart rate, skin- and muscle-blood flows. Skin and muscle vascular resistances were calculated from mean blood pressure and regional blood flows. Skin conductance level, fluctuations and responses were recorded as noncardiovascular SNS-responses. Compared to NT both HT and BT had higher resting blood pressures, heart rate, skin- and muscle-vascular resistances. BT showed higher resting skin conductance levels than HT and NT who were not different from one another. During stimulation HT and BT evidenced pressor hyperreactivity compared to NT. The electrodermal effects did not parallel the cardiovascular ones. Skin conductance and cardiovascular variables were more closely related in NT than HT or BT. The presence of cardiovascular hyperreactivity together with the absence of noncardiovascular hyperreactivity in HT indicates heightened SNS-activity specific to the cardiovascular system and not part of generalized SNS-arousal. The similarity between HT and BT is consistent with the notion that the differences between BT and HT are quantitative rather than qualitative.