A simple automatized audit system for following and managing practices of platelet and plasma transfusions in a neonatal intensive care unit

Paediatric clinical decision support: Evaluation of a best practice alert for red blood cell transfusion

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Providing red blood cell (RBC) transfusion to paediatric patients with a haemoglobin (Hb) level of <7 g/dL is the current best practice, but it is often difficult to ensure appropriateness of RBC transfusion on a health system level. Electronic health record (EHR) clinical decision support systems have been shown to be effective in encouraging providers to transfuse at appropriate Hb thresholds. We present our experience with an interruptive best practice alert (BPA) at a paediatric healthcare system.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An interruptive BPA requiring physician response was implemented in our EHR (Epic Systems Corp., Verona, WI, USA) in 2018 based on Hb thresholds for inpatients. The threshold was initially <8 g/dL and later changed to <7 g/dL in 2019. We assessed total activations, number of RBC transfusions and hospital metrics through 2022 compared to the 2 years prior to implementation.

RESULTS

The BPA activated 6956 times over 4 years, slightly less than 5/day, and the success rate, with no RBC transfusions within 24 h of order attempt, was 14.5% (1012/6956). There was a downward trend in the number of total RBC transfusions and RBC transfusions per admission after implementation, non-significant (p = 0.41 and p = >0.99). The annual case mix index was similar over the years evaluated. The estimated cost savings based on acquisition costs for RBC units were 213,822 USD or about $51,891 per year.

CONCLUSION

BPA implementation led to sustained change in RBC transfusion towards best practice, and there were long-term savings in RBC expenditure.

How well do critical care audit and feedback interventions adhere to best practice? Development and application of the REFLECT-52 evaluation tool

BACKGROUND

Healthcare Audit and Feedback (A&F) interventions have been shown to be an effective means of changing healthcare professional behavior, but work is required to optimize them, as evidence suggests that A&F interventions are not improving over time. Recent published guidance has suggested an initial set of best practices that may help to increase intervention effectiveness, which focus on the "Nature of the desired action," "Nature of the data available for feedback," "Feedback display," and "Delivering the feedback intervention." We aimed to develop a generalizable evaluation tool that can be used to assess whether A&F interventions conform to these suggestions for best practice and conducted initial testing of the tool through application to a sample of critical care A&F interventions.

METHODS

We used a consensus-based approach to develop an evaluation tool from published guidance and subsequently applied the tool to conduct a secondary analysis of A&F interventions. To start, the 15 suggestions for improved feedback interventions published by Brehaut et al. were deconstructed into rateable items. Items were developed through iterative consensus meetings among researchers. These items were then piloted on 12 A&F studies (two reviewers met for consensus each time after independently applying the tool to four A&F intervention studies). After each consensus meeting, items were modified to improve clarity and specificity, and to help increase the reliability between coders. We then assessed the conformity to best practices of 17 critical care A&F interventions, sourced from a systematic review of A&F interventions on provider ordering of laboratory tests and transfusions in the critical care setting. Data for each criteria item was extracted by one coder and confirmed by a second; results were then aggregated and presented graphically or in a table and described narratively.

RESULTS

In total, 52 criteria items were developed (38 ratable items and 14 descriptive items). Eight studies targeted lab test ordering behaviors, and 10 studies targeted blood transfusion ordering. Items focused on specifying the "Nature of the Desired Action" were adhered to most commonly-feedback was often presented in the context of an external priority (13/17), showed or described a discrepancy in performance (14/17), and in all cases it was reasonable for the recipients to be responsible for the change in behavior (17/17). Items focused on the "Nature of the Data Available for Feedback" were adhered to less often-only some interventions provided individual (5/17) or patient-level data (5/17), and few included aspirational comparators (2/17), or justifications for specificity of feedback (4/17), choice of comparator (0/9) or the interval between reports (3/13). Items focused on the "Nature of the Feedback Display" were reported poorly-just under half of interventions reported providing feedback in more than one way (8/17) and interventions rarely included pilot-testing of the feedback (1/17 unclear) or presentation of a visual display and summary message in close proximity of each other (1/13). Items focused on "Delivering the Feedback Intervention" were also poorly reported-feedback rarely reported use of barrier/enabler assessments (0/17), involved target members in the development of the feedback (0/17), or involved explicit design to be received and discussed in a social context (3/17); however, most interventions clearly indicated who was providing the feedback (11/17), involved a facilitator (8/12) or involved engaging in self-assessment around the target behavior prior to receipt of feedback (12/17).

CONCLUSIONS

Many of the theory-informed best practice items were not consistently applied in critical care and can suggest clear ways to improve interventions. Standardized reporting of detailed intervention descriptions and feedback templates may also help to further advance research in this field. The 52-item tool can serve as a basis for reliably assessing concordance with best practice guidance in existing A&F interventions trialed in other healthcare settings, and could be used to inform future A&F intervention development.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Not applicable.

Role of platelets in neonatal necrotizing enterocolitis

Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) is an inflammatory bowel necrosis of premature infants and is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in infants born between 23 and 28 weeks of gestation. Fifty to 95% of all infants with NEC develop thrombocytopenia (platelet counts <150 × 109/L) within 24-72 h of receiving this diagnosis. In many patients, thrombocytopenia is severe and is treated with one or more platelet transfusions. However, the underlying mechanism(s) and biological implications of NEC-related thrombocytopenia remain unclear. This review presents current evidence from human and animal studies on the clinical features and mechanisms of platelet depletion in NEC. Anecdotal clinical experience is combined with evidence from laboratory studies and from an extensive literature search in databases PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus and the electronic archives of abstracts presented at the annual meetings of the Pediatric Academic Societies. To avoid bias in identification of existing studies, key words were short-listed prior to the actual search both from anecdotal experience and from PubMed's Medical Subject Heading (MeSH) thesaurus. IMPACT: Fifty to 95% of infants with necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) develop idiopathic thrombocytopenia (platelet counts <150 × 109/L) within 24-72 h of disease onset. Early clinical trials suggest that moderate thrombocytopenia may be protective in human NEC, although further work is needed to fully understand this relationship. We have developed a neonatal murine model of NEC-related thrombocytopenia, where enteral administration of an immunological stimulant, trinitrobenzene sulfonate, on postnatal day 10 induces an acute necrotizing ileocolitis resembling human NEC. In this murine model, thrombocytopenia is seen at 15-18 h due to platelet consumption and mild-moderate thrombocytopenia is protective.

7 Is the New 8: Improving Adherence to Restrictive PRBC Transfusions in the Pediatric ICU

Up to 30%-40% of children admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) have anemia, and approximately 15% receive packed red blood cell (pRBC) transfusions. Current literature supports a pRBC transfusion threshold of hemoglobin less than or equal to seven for most PICU patients. Our objective was to determine pRBC transfusion rates, assess compliance with transfusion guidelines, understand patient-level variables that affect transfusion practices, and use cross-industry innovation to implement a practice strategy. This was a pre-post study of pediatric patients admitted to our PICU. We collected baseline data on pRBC transfusion practices. Next, we organized an innovation platform, which generated multi-industry ideas and produced an awareness campaign to effect pRBC ordering behavior. Innovative educational interventions were implemented, and postintervention transfusion practices were monitored. Statistical analysis was performed using linear mixed models. A p value < .05 was considered statistically significant. At baseline, 41% of pRBC transfusions met restrictive transfusion guidelines with a pretransfusion hemoglobin less than or equal to 7 g/dl. In the postintervention period, 53% of transfusions met restrictive transfusion guidelines (odds ratio 1.66, 95% confidence interval 1.21-2.28). Implementation of a behavioral campaign using multi-industry innovation led to improved adherence to pRBC transfusion guidelines in a tertiary care PICU.

Audit and feedback to improve laboratory test and transfusion ordering in critical care: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Laboratory tests and transfusions are sometimes ordered inappropriately, particularly in the critical care setting, which sees frequent use of both. Audit and Feedback (A&F) is a potentially useful intervention for modifying healthcare provider behaviors, but its application to the complex, team-based environment of critical care is not well understood. We conducted a systematic review of the literature on A&F interventions for improving test or transfusion ordering in the critical care setting.

METHODS

Five databases, two registries, and the bibliographies of relevant articles were searched. We included critical care studies that assessed the use of A&F targeting healthcare provider behaviors, alone or in combination with other interventions to improve test and transfusion ordering, as compared to historical practice, no intervention, or another healthcare behaviour change intervention. Studies were included only if they reported laboratory test or transfusion orders, or the appropriateness of orders, as outcomes. There were no restrictions based on study design, date of publication, or follow-up time. Intervention characteristics and absolute differences in outcomes were summarized. The quality of individual studies was assessed using a modified version of the Effective Practice and Organisation of Care Cochrane Review Group's criteria.

RESULTS

We identified 16 studies, including 13 uncontrolled before-after studies, one randomized controlled trial, one controlled before-after study, and one controlled clinical trial (quasi-experimental). These studies described 17 interventions, mostly (88%) multifaceted interventions with an A&F component. Feedback was most often provided in a written format only (41%), more than once (53%), and most often only provided data aggregated to the group-level (41%). Most studies saw a change in the hypothesized direction, but not all studies provided statistical analyses to formally test improvement. Overall study quality was low, with studies often lacking a concurrent control group.

CONCLUSIONS

Our review summarizes characteristics of A&F interventions implemented in the critical care context, points to some mechanisms by which A&F might be made more effective in this setting, and provides an overview of how the appropriateness of orders was reported. Our findings suggest that A&F can be effective in the context of critical care; however, further research is required to characterize approaches that optimize the effectiveness in this setting alongside more rigorous evaluation methods.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42016051941.

Utilization of frozen plasma, cryoprecipitate, and recombinant factor VIIa for children with hemostatic impairments: An audit of transfusion appropriateness

BACKGROUND

Blood transfusions and fractionated products are not without risk and may lead to acute and long-term adverse events. The objective of this study was to evaluate the appropriateness of usage of frozen plasma (FP), cryoprecipitate (CRYO), and recombinant factor VIIa (rVIIa) in a pediatric setting.

METHODS

All orders for FP, CRYO, and rVIIa were prospectively audited over 6 weeks. Data collected included demographics, laboratory values, indication, and adverse reactions. The appropriateness of each order was independently evaluated using adjudication criteria rated by two hematologists.

RESULTS

Two hundred sixty-five products were ordered; 67% of the orders were issued to operating rooms or intensive care units. The most common indication for all products was cardiac surgery. FP was ordered as fluid replacement (15/215; 7%) to correct abnormal coagulation tests (23/215; 11%) and for patients with minor or no bleeding (111/242; 46%). FP was more likely to alter the international normalized ratio (INR) if the INR was over 2.0 (P < 0.0001). The rate of inappropriate products was judged as FP 19%, CRYO 21%, and rVIIa 91%.

CONCLUSION

FP, CRYO, and rVIIa are most commonly used in the operating room and intensive care units. FP was often used for fluid resuscitation and for patients with mild to no bleeding. FP was only effective in lowering the INR when the INR was over 2.0. Use of rVIIa was rarely ordered for an appropriate indication. Results of this study inform its readers where trials of pediatric transfusion should be performed to clarify how these products should be used in clinical practice.

Clinical Decision Support for Pediatric Blood Product Prescriptions

Since the beginning of the 20th century, blood products have been used to effectively treat life-threatening conditions. Over time, we have come to appreciate the many benefits along with significant risks inherent to blood product transfusions. As such, recommendations for the safe and effective use of blood products have evolved over time. Current evidence supports the use of restrictive transfusion strategies that can avoid the risks of unnecessary transfusions. In spite of good evidence, there is a considerable amount of variability in transfusion practices across providers. Clinical decision support (CDS) is an effective tool capable of increasing adherence to evidence-based practices. CDS has been used successfully to improve adherence to transfusion guidelines. Pediatric literature demonstrates strong evidence for the use of CDS to improve appropriateness of red blood cell and plasma transfusion utilization. Further studies in more diverse settings with more standardized reporting are needed to provide more clarity around the effectiveness of CDS in blood product prescriptions.

Role of quality improvement in prevention of inappropriate transfusions

PURPOSE

Many different methods are used to manage surgical bleeding and reduce transfusion. Techniques vary by institution, resulting in inconsistent outcomes. We reviewed the current literature on the quality and costs of transfusions, focusing on prevention and management of transfusions during surgery, and provide recommendations on future directions for quality improvement (QI).

DATA SOURCES

Ovid, PubMed, and Scopus.

STUDY SELECTION

Key words included QI, blood loss, transfusion, hemostasis, and costs. Inclusion criteria were English language, publication between 1999 and 2010, and primary end points of blood loss, transfusion, or hemostasis.

DATA EXTRACTION

A total of 1331 abstracts were reviewed; 43 met the inclusion criteria.

RESULTS

A variety of bleeding management (BM) techniques were identified, with multiple studies suggesting that algorithms combining pre-, peri-, and postoperative interventions have the greatest potential to minimize transfusions. Most studies assessing the economic impact of BM interventions excluded resources beyond blood acquisition cost and longer-term complications, which may underestimate transfusion costs and bias estimates of the cost-effectiveness of interventions. Despite consensus on avoiding inappropriate transfusions, little agreement exists on optimal use of interventions.

CONCLUSIONS

Multifaceted algorithms show promising results. Future QI should focus on reducing practice variation via evidence-based guidelines for effective use of BM interventions.

Impact of national transfusion indicators on appropriate blood usage in critically ill patients

BACKGROUND

The objective was to investigate the impact of three national blood transfusion indicators (NBTIs) specifically designed for critical care regarding the appropriate blood transfusion indications.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

This was a prospective, single-center study, carried out at a university hospital. A total of 1808 patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) in 1 year were included.

RESULTS

The study consisted of four 90-day periods (P). P1 was a control period with no intervention. P2 followed the inclusion of NBTIs into the ICU database, aimed at reinforcing NBTI knowledge. After presenting and discussing the results of P1 and P2, the early (P3) and late (P4) impacts of NBTI knowledge were evaluated. All patients who were transfused with at least 1 unit of any blood component (33.3%) were included. Thirteen percent of red blood cell transfusions (RBCTs) were given outside of NBTI protocols (13% deviation of NBTIs for RBCTs) without a significant change throughout the duration of the study. Most RBCTs (95%) were prescribed for a hemoglobin threshold of less than 90 g/L. There was a steady and significant improvement in the adherence to NBTI guidelines for platelet concentrate transfusions (PCTs) from 36% (P1) to 52% (P4; p < 0.01). In contrast, the lack of adherence to NBTI guidelines for fresh-frozen plasma transfusions (FFPTs) remained high (74%) and stable throughout the study period. The most frequent reason for inappropriate use of FFPTs or PCTs was absence of severe bleeding.

CONCLUSION

The introduction of NBTI guidelines demonstrated a variable impact on the appropriateness of blood component transfusions in critically ill patients.

Platelet transfusion in the neonatal intensive care unit: benefits, risks, alternatives

Platelet transfusions were introduced into clinical medicine about 60 years ago when they were shown to reduce the mortality rate of patients with leukemia who were bleeding secondary to hyporegenerative thrombocytopenia. In modern neonatology units, platelet transfusions are integral and indeed lifesaving for some neonates. However, the great majority of platelet transfusions currently administered in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) are not given in the original paradigm to treat thrombocytopenic hemorrhage, but instead are administered prophylactically with the hope that they will reduce the risk of spontaneous bleeding. Weighing the risks and benefits of platelet transfusion, although imprecise, should be attempted each time a platelet transfusion is ordered. Adopting guidelines specific for platelet transfusion will improve consistency of care and will also generally reduce transfusion usage, thereby reducing costs and conserving valuable blood bank resources. Initiating specific programs to improve compliance with transfusion guidelines can further improve NICU transfusion practice.

Tracking blood products in blood centres using radio frequency identification: a comprehensive assessment

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Radio frequency identification (RFID) can be a key enabler for enhancing productivity and safety of the blood product supply chain. This article describes a systematic approach developed by the RFID Blood Consortium for a comprehensive feasibility and impact assessment of RFID application in blood centre operations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Our comprehensive assessment approach incorporates process-orientated and technological perspectives as well as impact analysis. Assessment of RFID-enabled process redesign is based on generic core processes derived from the three participating blood centres. The technological assessment includes RFID tag readability and performance evaluation, testing of temperature and biological effects of RF energy on blood products, and RFID system architecture design and standards. The scope of this article is limited to blood centre processes (from donation to manufacturing/distribution) for selected mainstream blood products (red blood cells and platelets).

RESULTS

Radio frequency identification can help overcome a number of common challenges and process inefficiencies associated with identification and tracking of blood products. High frequency-based RFID technology performs adequately and safely for red blood cell and platelet products. Productivity and quality improvements in RFID-enabled blood centre processes can recoup investment cost in a 4-year payback period.

CONCLUSION

Radio frequency identification application has significant process-orientated and technological implications. It is feasible and economically justifiable to incorporate RFID into blood centre processes.

Adherence to NICU transfusion guidelines: data from a multihospital healthcare system

OBJECTIVE

We critically reviewed every NICU blood component transfusion (packed erythrocytes, platelets, frozen plasma (FP) and cryoprecipitate) administered during a one-year period. This was done to determine the proportion of transfusions given out of compliance with the Intermountain Healthcare transfusion guidelines, and to look for patterns of non-compliance that could be addressed by quality improvement measures.

STUDY DESIGN

A detailed review was made of every transfusion administered to patients with a date of birth of 1 January 2006 through 31 December 2006, in any of three level III, perinatal-center-associated NICUs within Intermountain Healthcare.

RESULT

During 2006 the three NICUs cared for 1759 neonates. Seventeen percent of these received one or more (median 3) erythrocyte transfusions, 4% received one or more (median 3) platelet transfusions, 6% received one or more (median 1) FP infusions and 2% received cryoprecipitate (median 1 dose). Seventy percent of the erythrocyte transfusions were given in compliance with the guidelines, as were 69% of the platelet transfusions, 65% of the FP transfusions and 94% of the cryoprecipitate administrations. Patients who received large numbers of transfusions were more likely to receive transfusion that violated the guidelines. Forty-five percent of patients who received 1 to 3 transfusions received all transfusions within guidelines. However, only 18% of patients who received 4 to 10 transfusions received all within guidelines. No patient who received >10 transfusions received all within the guidelines. Erythrocyte transfusions given early in the hospital course were likely to be within guidelines; 72% (588/818) in the first 29 days were compliant with guidelines, but compliance fell to 61% (144/237) for transfusions administered after 29 days (P=0.002). About half of the platelet transfusions given early in the hospital course were in violation of guidelines, but after day 9, 83% of platelet transfusions were compliant with guidelines (P=0.000).

CONCLUSION

Opportunities exist in our healthcare system to improve compliance with our transfusion guidelines. Such opportunities are greatest among neonates receiving multiple transfusions, among those receiving erythrocyte transfusions late in their NICU course and among those receiving platelet transfusions early in their NICU course.

Advances and controversies in neonatal ICU platelet transfusion practice

Some of the platelet transfusions currently given to NICU patients are unnecessary and convey no benefits. Although ordered with good intentions, unnecessary platelet transfusions carry known and unknown risks. Identifying and eliminating any unnecessary platelet transfusions in NICUs would be a step toward better care, lower costs, and more careful preservation of blood component resources. A renewed interest in platelet transfusion studies is needed, if essential data is to be gathered to improve NICU platelet transfusion practice. Retrospective studies can be of value: for instance, seeking associations between bleeding events and platelet counts can suggest the possibility of cause and effect relationships. Such studies might identify approximate platelet count levels that convey high hemorrhagic risk and might help focus future prospective trials. Prospective indirect studies also can be of value, for instance, measuring the template bleeding time and the PFA-100 closure time as a function of platelet count and perhaps as a function of circulating platelet mass, and would provide new information with relevance to platelet transfusion benefits. Such studies might give a better awareness of how low the platelet count can fall before platelet plug formation is impaired. It seems inescapable, however, that new, multicentered, randomized, prospective studies are needed, where NICU patients are assigned different platelet transfusion triggers and then carefully tracked for bleeding events and long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes. Only that type of study is likely to generate the evidence base needed for widespread implementation of improvements in NICU platelet transfusion practice.

Do platelet transfusions in the NICU adversely affect survival? Analysis of 1600 thrombocytopenic neonates in a multihospital healthcare system

OBJECTIVE

Several studies have indicated a correlation between the number of platelet transfusions received by newborn intensive care unit (NICU) patients and the mortality rate. The number of platelet transfusions might be a marker for level of illness, and thus predictive of mortality. However, an alternative hypothesis is that multiple platelet transfusions themselves are harmful in this population.

STUDY DESIGN

We evaluated data from all thrombocytopenic neonates cared for in the Intermountain Healthcare NICUs in the past 4 years, seeking associations between the lowest platelet count recorded, number of platelet transfusions received and mortality rate. We also conducted a sensitivity analysis to examine the hypothesis that platelet transfusions were responsible for some fraction of the mortality rate.

RESULT

Transfusion and outcome data were examined from 1600 thrombocytopenic NICU patients. At any level of platelet count, some patients received platelet transfusions but others did not. However, at all levels of platelet count, those that received platelet transfusions had a higher mortality rate. Neonates not given any platelet transfusions had a mortality rate of 2%, those with 1 or 2 transfusions had a mortality rate of 11% (P<0.001); those with >10 had a mortality rate of 35% (P<0.001); and those with > or = 20 had a mortality rate of 50% (P<0.001). A sensitivity analysis suggested that the platelet transfusions themselves were very likely responsible for some fraction of the increasing mortality rate.

CONCLUSION

The number of platelet transfusions administered in the NICU predicts the mortality rate. Some of this correlation is ascribable to unknown and unmeasured factors such as level of illness. However, the present data and the sensitivity analysis both suggest that some of this correlation is due to harmful effects of multiple platelet transfusions in this group of patients.

New technology for transfusion safety

Hemovigilance programs from around the world document that the greatest risk to recipients of blood transfusion is human error, resulting in transfusion of the incorrect blood component. Errors in transfusion care have strong parallels with errors in medication administration. Errors often result from 'lapse' or 'slip' mistakes in which details of patient identification are overlooked. Three areas of transfusion are focal points for improved care: the labelling of the patient's pre-transfusion sample, the decision to transfuse and the final bedside check designed to prevent mis-transfusion. Both barcodes and radio-frequency identification technology, each ideally suited to matching alpha-numeric identifiers, are being implemented in order to improve performance sample labelling and the bedside check. The decision to transfuse should ultimately be enhanced through the use of nanotechnology sensors, computerised order entry and decision support systems. Obstacles to the deployment of new technology include resistance to change, confusion regarding the best technology, and uncertainty regarding the return-on-investment. By focusing on overall transfusion safety, deploying validated systems appropriate for both medication and blood administration, thoughtful integration of technology into bedside practice and demonstration of improved performance, the application of new technologies will improve care for patients in need of transfusion therapy.