Two types of allograft-induced cytotoxic macrophage, one against allografts and the other against syngeneic or allogeneic tumor cells

IFN-γ Control of an Effector/Target Combination for Skin Allograft Rejection: Macrophage/Skin Components in Normal Mice or T Cell/Endothelial Cells in IFN-γ-Deficient Mice

Organ, skin, or cell allografts are acutely rejected from normal mice, whereas vascularized organ allografts, but not allografted Meth A cells, are rejected from interferon-γ (IFN-γ)-deficient mice. Here we explored effector/target combinations for i.p. allografted Meth A (cytotoxic T lymphocyte [CTL]-resistant) or RLmale1 (CTL-susceptible) cells into or for BALB/c skin (skin components: CTL resistant) onto normal or IFN-γ-deficient C57BL/6 mice. After allografting, normal mice showed more infiltration but only a little thrombosis/hemorrhage. Monocyte/macrophage MHC receptor (MMR)⁺ macrophages (on days 5-10) and T cell receptor (TCR)⁺ CTLs (on days 7-9) were cytotoxic against Meth A cells or skin components and RLmale1 cells, respectively, and the allografts were rejected. After allografting into IFN-γ-deficient mice, MMR^- macrophages and highly activated TCR⁺ CTLs were induced, and the mice died of hemorrhagic ascites with Meth A cells and more acutely rejected RLmale1 cells. The CTLs on days 4-6 were inactive toward skin components at an in vivo effector/target ratio but injured endothelial cells to cause severe thrombosis/hemorrhage and more acute rejection of skin allografts. These results indicate that IFN-γ-dependent MMR expression was essential for macrophage-mediated cytolysis of allogeneic skin components and that IFN-γ-deficient mice more acutely rejected skin allograft by causing CTL-induced injury to endothelial cells.

Down-regulated expression of monocyte/macrophage major histocompatibility complex receptors in human and mouse monocytes by expression of their ligands

Mouse monocyte/macrophage major histocompatibility complex (MHC) receptor 1 (MMR1; or MMR2) specific for H-2D(d) (or H-2K(d) ) molecules is expressed on monocytes from non-H-2D(d) (or non-H-2K(d) ), but not those from H-2D(d) (or H-2K(d) ), inbred mice. The MMR1 and/or MMR2 is essential for the rejection of H-2D(d) - and/or H-2K(d) -transgenic mouse skin onto C57BL/6 (H-2D(b) K(b) ) mice. Recently, we found that human leucocyte antigen (HLA)-B44 was the sole ligand of human MMR1 using microbeads that had been conjugated with 80 types of HLA class I molecules covering 94·2% (or 99·4%) and 92·4% (or 96·2%) of HLA-A and B molecules of Native Americans (or Japanese), respectively. In the present study, we also explored the ligand specificity of human MMR2 using microbeads. Microbeads coated with HLA-A32, HLA-B13 or HLA-B62 antigens bound specifically to human embryonic kidney (HEK)293T or EL-4 cells expressing human MMR2 and to the solubilized MMR2-green fluorescent protein (GFP) fusion protein; and MMR2(+) monocytes from a volunteer bound HLA-B62 molecules with a Kd of 8·7 × 10(-9)  M, implying a three times down-regulation of MMR2 expression by the ligand expression. H-2K(d) (or H-2D(d) ) transgene into C57BL/6 mice down-regulated not only MMR2 (or MMR1) but also MMR1 (or MMR2) expression, leading to further down-regulation of MMR expression. In fact, monocytes from two (i.e. MMR1(+) /MMR2(+) and MMR1(-) /MMR2(-) ) volunteers bound seven to nine types of microbeads among 80, indicating ≤ 10 types of MMR expression on monocytes. The physiological role of constitutive MMRs on monocytes possibly towards allogeneic (e.g. fetal) cells in the blood appears to be distinct from that of inducible MMRs on macrophages toward allografts in tissue.

Macrophage MHC and T-cell receptors essential for rejection of allografted skin and lymphoma

BACKGROUND

Skin or organ allograft rejection is dependent on noncytotoxic CD4(+) T cells, but the mechanisms of recognition and rejection remain elusive. Previously, we demonstrated C57BL/6 (H-2D(b)K(b)) macrophage-mediated, cell-to-cell contact-dependent, d haplotype-specific lysis of allografts (e.g., BALB/c skin and Meth A cells; H-2D(d)K(d)) in the rejection site and isolated two cDNA clones encoding receptors on macrophages for H-2D(d) and H-2K(d), macrophage major histocompatibility complex receptor (MMR) 1 and 2, respectively.

METHODS

To elucidate the role of MMR2 and T-cell receptors (TCRs) in graft rejection, we generated MMR2 knockout (KO) mice on a C57BL/6 background and transplanted D(d), K(d), or D(d)K(d) transgenic C57BL/6 skin or EL-4 lymphoma cells onto or into these KO mice.

RESULTS

MMR2 KO mice lacking MMR2 mRNA or protein expression in their monocytes had no obvious abnormalities in terms of cell number in or composition of their lymphoid tissues or in T lymphocyte responses to alloantigen or nonalloantigen, whereas they failed to reject K(d) transgenic skin grafts. Surprisingly, they also lacked MMR1 mRNA and protein expression in their monocytes and failed to reject D(d) or D(d)K(d) transgenic skin grafts. However, they did reject skin grafts from mice expressing H-2I(d), minor H(d), or third-party major histocompatibility complex. On the contrary, D(d)-, K(d)-, or D(d)K(d)-EL-4 cells injected intradermally or intraperitoneally into MMR2 KO mice were rejected by TCR(αβ)(+)/CD8(+) T cells in a transgene number-dependent and MMR-independent manner.

CONCLUSIONS

These results demonstrate that MMRs on monocytes/macrophages and TCRs on cytotoxic T lymphocytes in mice were essential for recognition and rejection of allografted skin and lymphoma, respectively.

MHC class I recognition by monocyte-/macrophage-specific receptors

The most important transplantation antigens in the discrimination between "self" and "nonself" are encoded by genes in the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) locus (H-2 in mice). It has been assumed that T lymphocytes are the effector cells for allograft rejection, as athymic nude rodents fail to reject allografts. In 1988, we i.p. transplanted Meth A (H-2D(d)K(d)) tumor cells into C57BL/6 (H-2D(b)K(b)) mice and found macrophages to be cytotoxic against the allografts. In 1996, several groups using CD4 or CD8 knockout mice reported that non-T cells were the effector cells for the rejection of skin or organ allografts. In 1998, we ascertained that macrophages were the effector cells of skin allograft rejection. Recently, we isolated cDNA clones encoding monocyte/macrophage MHC receptors (MMRs) for H-2D(d) and H-2K(d); established H-2D(d)- and/or H-2K(d)-transgenic mice and lymphoma cells; and found, using MMR-deficient mice, that MMR and T-cell receptor were essential for the rejection of transgenic skin and lymphoma, respectively.

Spontaneous rejection of intradermally transplanted non-engineered tumor cells by neutrophils and macrophages from syngeneic strains of mice

It is not surprising that tumors arising spontaneously are rarely rejected by T cells, because in general they lack molecules to elicit a primary T-cell response. In fact, cytokine-engineered tumors can induce granulocyte infiltration leading to tumor rejection. In the present study, we i.d. injected seven kinds of non-engineered tumor cells into syngeneic strains of mice. Three of them (i.e. B16, KLN205, and 3LL cells) continued to grow, whereas four of them (i.e. Meth A, I-10, CL-S1, and FM3A cells) were spontaneously rejected after transient growth or without growth. In contrast to the i.d. injection of B16 cells into C57BL/6 mice, which induces infiltration of TAMs into the tumors, the i.d. injection of Meth A cells into BALB/c mice induced the invasion of cytotoxic inflammatory cells, but not of TAMs, into or around the tumors leading to an IFN-γ-dependent rejection. On day 5, the cytotoxic activity against the tumor cells reached a peak; and the effector cells were found to be neutrophils and macrophages. The i.d. Meth A or I-10 cell-immunized, but not non-immunized, mice rejected i.p.- or i.m.-transplanted Meth A or I-10 cells without growth, respectively. The main effector cells were CTLs; and there was no cross-sensitization between these two kinds of tumor cells, suggesting specific rejection of tumor cells by CTLs from i.d. immunized mice. These results indicate that infiltration of cytotoxic myeloid cells (i.e. neutrophils and macrophages, but not TAMs) into or around tumors is essential for their IFN-γ-dependent spontaneous rejection.

Rejection of intradermally injected syngeneic tumor cells from mice by specific elimination of tumor-associated macrophages with liposome-encapsulated dichloromethylene diphosphonate, followed by induction of CD11b(+)/CCR3(-)/Gr-1(-) cells cytotoxic against the tumor cells

Tumor cell expansion relies on nutrient supply, and oxygen limitation is central in controlling neovascularization and tumor spread. Monocytes infiltrate into tumors from the circulation along defined chemotactic gradients, differentiate into tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs), and then accumulate in the hypoxic areas. Elevated TAM density in some regions or overall TAM numbers are correlated with increased tumor angiogenesis and a reduced host survival in the case of various types of tumors. To evaluate the role of TAMs in tumor growth, we here specifically eliminated TAMs by in vivo application of dichloromethylene diphosphonate (DMDP)-containing liposomes to mice bearing various types of tumors (e.g., B16 melanoma, KLN205 squamous cell carcinoma, and 3LL Lewis lung cancer), all of which grew in the dermis of syngeneic mouse skin. When DMDP-liposomes were injected into four spots to surround the tumor on day 0 or 5 after tumor injection and every third day thereafter, both the induction of TAMs and the tumor growth were suppressed in a dose-dependent and injection number-dependent manner; and unexpectedly, the tumor cells were rejected by 12 injections of three times-diluted DMDP-liposomes. The absence of TAMs in turn induced the invasion of inflammatory cells into or around the tumors; and the major population of effector cells cytotoxic against the target tumor cells were CD11b(+) monocytic macrophages, but not CCR3(+) eosinophils or Gr-1(+) neutrophils. These results indicate that both the absence of TAMs and invasion of CD11b(+) monocytic macrophages resulted in the tumor rejection.