Treatment of thoracic esophageal carcinoma invading adjacent structures

Treatment patterns and survival in T4b esophageal cancer: a retrospective cohort study

PURPOSE

This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of various treatment approaches in stage T4b esophageal cancer patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results databases, covering patients diagnosed with esophageal cancer between 2000 and 2020. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to assess cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) across different treatment patterns.

RESULTS

The study included 482 patients: 222 (46.1%) received chemoradiotherapy, 58 (12.0%) underwent radiotherapy alone, 37 (7.7%) received chemotherapy alone, 50 (10.4%) underwent surgery, and 115 (23.8%) received no treatment. Median CSS were 12, 4, 6, 18, and 1 month for chemoradiotherapy, radiotherapy alone, chemotherapy alone, surgery, and non-treatment groups. Median OS for these groups were 11, 3, 6, 17, and 1 month, respectively. Multivariable proportional hazard regression analysis revealed that patients who underwent surgery experienced significantly improved CSS (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.42, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.24-0.72; P = 0.002) and OS (HR = 0.45, 95% CI: 0.28-0.74; P = 0.002) compared to those receiving chemoradiotherapy after propensity score matching.

CONCLUSIONS

Esophagectomy, with or without radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy, results in better survival outcomes than chemoradiotherapy in patients with stage T4b esophageal cancer.

Safe and curative modified two-stage operation for T4 esophageal cancer after definitive chemoradiotherapy: a case report

BACKGROUND

The prognosis of esophageal cancer (EC) with organ invasion is extremely poor. In these cases, definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by salvage surgery can be planned; however, the issue of high morbidity and mortality rates persists. Herein, we report the long-term survival of a patient with EC and T4 invasion who underwent a modified two-stage operation after definitive CRT.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 60-year-old male presented with type 2 upper thoracic EC with tracheal invasion. First, definitive CRT was performed, which resulted in tumor shrinkage and improvement in the tracheal invasion. However, an esophagotracheal fistula subsequently developed, and the patient was treated with fasting and antibiotics. Although the fistula recovered, severe esophageal stenoses made oral intake impossible. To improve quality of life and cure the EC, a modified two-stage operation was planned. In the first surgery, an esophageal bypass was performed using a gastric tube with cervical and abdominal lymph node dissections. After confirming improved nutritional status and absence of distant metastasis, the second surgery was performed with subtotal esophagectomy, mediastinal lymph node dissection, and tracheobronchial coverage of the fistula. The patient discharged without major complications after radical resection and has been recurrence-free for 5 years since the start of treatment.

CONCLUSION

A standard curative strategy could be difficult for EC with T4 invasion due to differences in the invaded organs, presence of complications, and patient condition. Therefore, patient-tailored treatment plans are needed, including a modified two-stage operation.

Multimodal Treatment Strategies to Improve the Prognosis of Locally Advanced Thoracic Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Narrative Review

Esophageal cancer is the seventh most common malignancy and sixth most common cause of cancer-related death globally. Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) with aortic or tracheal invasion is considered unresectable, and has an extremely poor prognosis; its standard treatment is definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT). In recent years, induction chemotherapy (ICT) has been reported to yield high response rates for locally advanced ESCC, and the efficacy and safety of ICT followed by conversion surgery (CS) have been investigated. Multimodal treatment, combining surgery with induction chemoradiotherapy (ICRT) or ICT, is necessary to improve ESCC prognosis. CS is generally performed for locally advanced ECC after ICRT or ICT when tumor downstaging is achieved, although its prognostic benefit remains controversial. The Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG) has conducted a three-arm phase III randomized controlled trial (JCOG1510) to confirm the superiority of DCF (docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil) ICT, over conventional dCRT, among patients with initially unresectable ESCC. In recent years, researchers have reported favorable outcomes of induction therapy followed by CS and salvage surgery, after dCRT or systemic immunochemotherapy. In this review, we will describe the latest developments in the multimodal treatment including chemotherapy, CRT, surgery, and immunotherapy, which may improve oncological and survival outcomes for patients with cT4 ESCC.

Survival rates and safety associated with chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery and chemoradiotherapy alone for patients with T4 esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The optimal treatment approach for T4 esophageal cancer is not well established. We aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the survival rates and safety of chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery (CRT-S) and chemoradiotherapy alone (CRT) in patients with T4 N_any M0 esophageal cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We searched databases for eligible prospective or retrospective studies. The outcomes of interest were overall survival (OS) at 1, 3 and 5 years, treatment-related fistula formation and mortality rates. Meta-analyses were performed using the random effects models separately for studies evaluating CRT-S and CRT. Subgroup analyses were performed based on histology, radiation dose, chemotherapy regimen and duration of the interval between CRT and surgery.

RESULTS

We identified 23 studies including 1,119 patients with predominantly squamous cell carcinoma (93%) and adenocarcinoma (3%) histology. The OS rates of patients receiving CRT-S were 65%, 36% and 20% at 1, 3 and 5 years, respectively. The OS rates of patients receiving CRT were 30%, 11% and 10% at 1, 3 and 5 years, respectively. Treatment-related fistula formation rates were 4% for CRT-S and 9% for CRT. Treatment-related mortality rates were 3% for both groups. Subgroup analyses showed that the interval of >2 months between CRT and surgery was associated with significantly improved OS rates at 1, 3 and 5 years.

CONCLUSION

Chemoradiotherapy is an efficacious treatment approach for T4 esophageal cancer, with clinically acceptable rates of treatment-related fistula formation and mortality. Tri-modality approach with surgery can be considered in carefully selected patients. Our study findings should be interpreted with caution due to the lack of high-quality evidence. Randomized controlled trials are warranted to confirm these findings.

Surgical strategies for treatment of clinical T4 esophageal cancer in Japan

Definitive chemoradiation (dCRT) is the mainstay treatment for cStage IVa esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) with good performance status (PS), according to standard practice guidelines. Salvage surgery may incur operation complications and risk of mortality. According to the esophageal cancer practice guidelines outlined by the Japan Esophageal Society, when a tumor is residual and recurrent, chemotherapy and palliative symptomatic treatment is continued. However, salvage operation has been selected as a therapeutic option for recurrent or residual tumors after dCRT. There is weak evidence for not recommending surgery for cStage IVa ESCC exhibiting residual disease following dCRT. It has been reported that during salvage surgery the only prognostic factor that is thought to be performed is complete resection (R0), but at the same time, salvage esophagectomy increases the incidence of postoperative complications and mortality. The phase II chemoselection study by Yokota T et al. in Japan showed that multidisciplinary treatment initiated by induction therapy, in which docetaxel is added to cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil, resulted in a good prognosis in the short term. In this review, we discuss the surgical strategy and future of unresectable clinical T4 (cT4) ESCC.

Multicenter Randomized Phase 2 Trial Comparing Chemoradiotherapy and Docetaxel Plus 5-Fluorouracil and Cisplatin Chemotherapy as Initial Induction Therapy for Subsequent Conversion Surgery in Patients With Clinical T4b Esophageal Cancer: Short-term Results

OBJECTIVE

We conducted a multicenter randomized prospective phase 2 trial of chemoradiotherapy (CRT) versus chemotherapy (CT) as initial induction therapy for conversion surgery (CS) in clinical T4b esophageal cancer. We compared treatment effects and adverse events (AEs).

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Although induction followed by CS is potentially curative for T4b esophageal cancer, the optimal initial induction treatment is unclear.

METHODS

Ninety-nine patients with T4b esophageal cancer were randomly allocated to chemoradiotherapy (Group A, n = 49) or CT (Group B, n = 50) as initial induction treatment. CRT consisted of radiation (50.4 Gy) with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil. CT consisted of 2 cycles of docetaxel plus cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (DCF). CRT or CT was followed by CS if resectable. If unresectable, the patient received the other treatment as secondary treatment. CS was performed if resectable after secondary treatment. The primary end point was 2-year overall survival.

RESULTS

In Group A, CS was performed in 34 (69%) and 7 patients (14%) after initial and secondary treatment. In Group B, CS was performed in 25 (50%) and 17 patients (34%) after initial and secondary treatment. The R0 resection rate after initial and secondary treatment was similar (78% vs 76%, P = 1.000). AEs including leukopenia, neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, and diarrhea were significantly more frequent in Group B. Group A had better histological complete response of the primary tumor (40% vs 17%, P = 0.028) and histological nodal status (P = 0.038).

CONCLUSION

Upfront CRT was superior to upfront CT in terms of pathological effects and AEs. The Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (s051180164).

Esophageal cancer patients' survival after complete response to definitive chemoradiotherapy: a retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND

Chemoradiotherapy is an alternative to surgery for esophageal cancer, with a putatively equivalent outcome. However, disease recurrence after a complete response is common and if follow-up surveillance detects recurrence, salvage treatments for potentially curable disease must follow.

METHODS

We conducted a nation-wide questionnaire survey of institutions in Japan certified by the Japanese Esophageal Society to investigate outcomes of primary thoracic esophageal cancer patients initially treated by chemoradiotherapy with complete response diagnoses. The primary endpoint was overall survival, the secondary endpoint disease recurrence. Outcomes of patients who had undergone salvage treatments were also investigated. Cases were excluded from analysis if endoscopic study, endoscopic biopsy, or computed tomography data were lacking.

RESULTS

At 41 institutes 544 case records were collected; valid data on 392 patients were obtained; 5-year survival was 74.8%, 5-year disease-free survival, 66.8%. Clinical staging before treatment significantly affected both overall and disease-free survival rates, but differences between adjoining stages were unexpectedly small. The primary relapse site was classified as primary site (n = 58), regional lymph nodes (n = 36), or distant disease (n = 34). Salvage treatments with curative intent (surgery, endoscopic treatments, and additional radiation) were performed on 38, 23, and 4 cases; 5-year survival after esophagectomy (n = 22), endoscopic treatment (n = 23), and lymphadenectomy (n = 9) was 47.4%, 70.9%, and 33.3%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

A quarter of patients developed recurrent disease, mostly locoregional, after complete response. Complete response patients with originally advanced stage disease had fair clinical outcomes; salvage treatments after locoregional recurrence achieved modest long-term survival.

Neoadjuvant radiotherapy for locoregional Siewert type II gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: A propensity scores matching analysis

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the effect of neoadjuvant radiotherapy (nRT) on prognosis in patients with locoregional Siewert type II gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (GEA).

METHOD

All patients pathologically diagnosed as Siewert type II GEA between 2004 and 2015 were retrieved from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and Final Results (SEER) database. We analyzed the impact of different treatment regimens on the prognosis in each stage. Survival analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier (K-M) method. Multivariate Cox model and propensity score matching was further used to verify the results.

RESULTS

4,160 patients were included in this study. The efficacy of nRT was superior to that of adjuvant radiotherapy (aRT) (p = 0.048), which was the same as that of surgery combined with chemotherapy (p = 0.836), but inferior to the overall survival (OS) of surgical treatment alone (p<0.001) in T1-2N0M0 patients. Patients receiving nRT had distinctly better survival than those receiving surgical treatment alone (p = 0.008), but had similar survival compared with patients treated with aRT (p = 0.989) or surgery combined with chemotherapy (p = 0.205) in the T3N0/T1-3N+M0 subgroup. The efficacy of nRT is clearly stronger than that of surgical therapy alone (p<0.001), surgery combined with chemotherapy (p<0.001), and aRT (p = 0.008) in patients with T4 stage. The survival analysis results were consistent before and after propensity score matching.

CONCLUSION

In these carefully selected patients, the present study made the following recommendations: nRT can improve the prognosis of patients with T3N0M0/T1-3N+M0 and T4 Siewert type II GEA, and it seems to be a better treatment for T4 patients. Surgery alone seems to be sufficient, and nRT is not conducive to prolonging the survival of Siewert II GEA patients with T1-2N0M0 stage. Of course, further prospective trials are needed to verify this conclusion.

Endobronchial Ultrasound Improves the Diagnosis of the Tracheobronchial Invasion of Advanced Esophageal Cancer

BACKGROUND

Accurate diagnosis of the tracheobronchial invasion of advanced esophageal cancer is essential to select appropriate treatment and improve prognosis; however, it is difficult using the conventional modalities. This study aimed to clarify the diagnostic usefulness of convex probe endobronchial ultrasound (CP-EBUS) for the diagnosis of the tracheobronchial invasion of advanced esophageal cancer.

METHODS

We conducted a cadaveric study to clarify the changes in ultrasonic and histopathologic findings in the esophageal tumor and tracheal invasion models. Additionally, we examined CP-EBUS for patients with advanced thoracic esophageal cancer in whom tracheobronchial invasion was suspected on contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CE-CT) scan. We retrospectivity evaluated the diagnosis of CP-EBUS, comparing the pathological findings and treatment outcomes.

RESULTS

Cadaveric esophageal tumor and tracheal invasion models showed the disappearance of the third layer observed with CP-EBUS and histologically proven interruption of the adventitia. This indicated that the third layer corresponded with the tracheal adventitia. We examined 40 patients with advanced thoracic esophageal cancer in whom tracheobronchial invasion was suspected. The precise diagnosis was pathologically confirmed in 9 of 14 patients diagnosed with cT3 who underwent radical surgery. 20 of 26 cases diagnosed with cT4b received definitive chemoradiotherapy, and 4 cases received salvage surgery and pathologically confirmed precise diagnosis.

CONCLUSION

CP-EBUS is extremely useful for diagnosing the tracheobronchial invasion of advanced esophageal cancer. It could be an effective modality for determining treatment strategies in cases with a marginal surgical indication.

Comparison of Aggressive Planned Salvage Surgery Versus Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy Plus Surgery for Borderline Resectable T4 Squamous Cell Carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

We compare planned salvage surgery after definitive chemoradiotherapy (SALV) versus neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus surgery (NCRS) for borderline resectable T4 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 37 patients underwent planned SALV, and 20 underwent NCRS from 2004 to 2017. The short-term outcome measures were the R0 resection rate, complications, and treatment-related mortality. The long-term outcome measures were the 5-year overall survival rate and causes of death.

RESULTS

R0 resection rate was similar between the SALV and NCRS groups (81% versus 85%). The incidence of postoperative pneumonia (35% versus 18%) and treatment-related mortality rate (9% versus 0%) tended to be higher in the SALV. ypT grade 2-3 (65% versus 30%, p = 0.012) and Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ IIIb complications (32% versus 0%, p = 0.008) were significantly more frequent in the SALV group. The groups had similar 5-year overall survival (26% versus 27%). The causes of death in the SALV and NCRS groups were primary esophageal cancer in 35% and 55% of patients, respectively, and pulmonary-related mortality in 24% and 5%, respectively. Multivariable Cox regression analysis revealed the following significant poor prognostic factors: stable disease as the clinical response, preoperative body mass index (BMI) of < 18.5 kg/m², ypN stage 1-3, and R1-2 resection.

CONCLUSIONS

SALV was associated with a higher incidence of late pulmonary-related mortality but had a stronger antitumor effect than NCRS. Consequently, the survival rate was similar between the groups. Surgery is recommended for patients with a partial response and preoperative BMI of ≥ 18.5 kg/m².

Definitive chemoradiotherapy for clinical T4b esophageal cancer - Treatment outcomes, failure patterns, and prognostic factors

PURPOSE

The management of cT4b thoracic esophageal cancer (EC) is challenging. The optimal treatment remains unclear, and prospective or large-scale retrospective reports on treatment outcomes are lacking. The present study was conducted to investigate the treatment outcomes, failure patterns, treatment responses, and prognostic factors focusing on cT4b thoracic EC treated by definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (dCRT).

METHODS

A retrospective review of cT4b thoracic EC patients treated with curative intent dCRT at our institution between 2009 and 2017 was conducted. Survival analysis was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and prognostic factors were examined by the Cox proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

A total of 95 cT4b EC patients were included, and the median survival was 11.4 months. The 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year survival rates were 49.4%, 22.2%, and 19.0%, respectively. Forty-six patients (48.4%) experienced locoregional failure, 3 patients (3.2%) developed distant metastasis, and 11 patients had synchronous locoregional and distant failure. The corresponding 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year locoregional failure rates were 62.6%, 74.5%, and 79.2%, respectively. The treatment response rate was 76.9%, and clinical complete response was achieved in 25.3% of patients. Multivariable analysis revealed that age ≤ 65 (p = 0.003), pre-dCRT body mass index (BMI) > 21 (p < 0.001), clinical N stage 0-1 (p = 0.014), and tumor length ≤ 6 cm (p = 0.026) were independent prognosticators for better survival.

CONCLUSION

Our study revealed that long-term survival is achievable for cT4b EC patients treated by dCRT, with a 3-year survival rate of more than 20%. Locoregional recurrence was the most common failure pattern. Age, BMI, N stage, and tumor length were significant prognosticators for survival in this group of patients.

Salvage Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy (RAMIE) for T4b Esophageal Cancer After Definitive Chemoradiotherapy

Background

Patients  with esophageal cancer  that invades adjacent structures (cT4b) are precluded from surgery and usually treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT). dCRT might result in sufficient downstaging to enable a radical resection, possibly improving survival. This study aimed to assess the perioperative and oncologic outcomes of a salvage robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) in patients with cT4b esophageal cancer after dCRT.

Methods

Between June 2012 and November 2019, patients who underwent a RAMIE with a gastric conduit reconstruction after completion of dCRT for cT4b esophageal carcinoma were identified from a prospectively maintained surgical database at the University Medical Center Utrecht.

Results

In total, 24 patients with a histopathologically confirmed T4b adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus were included. The adjacent organs involved were the tracheobronchial tree (67%), aorta (21%) or both (13%). No conversions or major intraoperative complications were observed. A radical resection was achieved in 22 patients (92%), and a pathologic complete response was observed in 13 (54%) patients. Postoperative grade 2 or higher complications occurred in 20 patients (83%). The disease-free survival at 24 months was 68% for the patients in whom a radical resection was achieved.

Conclusion

In patients with cT4b esophageal cancer treated with dCRT followed by a salvage RAMIE, a radical resection rate of 92% was achieved, with acceptable complications and promising survival rates. These results demonstrate the feasibility of a curative surgical treatment for patients with initially irresectable esophageal cancer but underscore the importance of a proper preoperative patient selection.

Successful Management of Esophageal Cancer With Perforation Using Bypass Surgery Followed by Definitive Chemoradiotherapy

BACKGROUND

Esophageal perforation in advanced esophageal cancer requires immediate treatment. However, no clear treatment protocol has been established for this condition. We report a case of advanced esophageal cancer with esophageal perforation treated with esophageal bypass surgery and definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT).

CASE REPORT

A 45-year-old woman was diagnosed with locally advanced esophageal cancer with esophageal perforation. Although the patient's general condition was relatively stable, no improvement was expected through conservative treatment. Esophageal gastric bypass surgery was performed; her symptoms improved postoperatively and oral ingestion became possible. Definitive CRT with 66 Gy radiotherapy and chemotherapy with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil was administered. A complete clinical response was achieved. The patient is alive and well without recurrence 20 months after treatment.

CONCLUSION

Definitive CRT after esophageal bypass surgery is a potential treatment option for locally advanced esophageal cancer with esophageal perforation to improve treatment response and quality of life.

Analysis of fistula formation of T4 esophageal cancer patients treated by chemoradiotherapy

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Fistula is one of the known complications of T4 esophageal cancer (T4-EC). The standard treatment for T4-EC is chemoradiotherapy, but detailed data about fistula resulting from chemoradiotherapy in this condition are limited. In particular, radiographic findings of T4-EC with fistula have not been reported. This study assessed the risk factors of fistula based on clinical information on patients with chemoradiotherapy for T4-EC.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the clinical data of 59 T4-EC patients who had squamous cell carcinoma without any fistula before receiving definitive or palliative chemoradiotherapy.

RESULTS

A fistula was observed in 18 patients (31%) throughout their clinical course. The overall survival in the fistula group was significantly shorter than that in the non-fistula group (259 vs. 346 days; p = 0.0341). The axial tumor size on computed tomography (CT) was confirmed as an independent risk factor for esophageal fistula in multivariate analysis of stepwise methods [OR 1.226; 95% CI 1.109-1.411; p < 0.0001]. Twelve out of 14 patients with an axial tumor size of 50 mm or greater had developed a fistula.

CONCLUSIONS

A large tumor size on the axial plane on CT is a risk factor for fistula formation.

Long-term outcomes of multimodal therapy combining definitive chemoradiotherapy and salvage surgery for T4 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Survival outcomes of patients with cT4 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) remain extremely poor. We aimed to investigate long-term outcomes and identify prognostic factors in patients treated by definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) alone or with dCRT plus salvage surgery (SALV) for cT4 ESCC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In total, 73 patients completing dCRT were analyzed. Patients achieving clinical complete response (CR) received follow-up evaluations thereafter. For patients diagnosed with clinical partial response (PR), potentially curative SALV was generally performed. Possible prognostic factors included demographic data, tumor staging, blood chemistry profiles, and esophageal stenosis.

RESULTS

The 1- and 3-year overall survival (OS) rates of the 73 patients were 67.1% and 40.8%, respectively. Twenty-one patients (29%) achieved clinical CR with dCRT alone. Among 35 patients (48%) with clinical PR, 31 underwent SALV and 4 opted for non-surgical treatments. In the dCRT-alone group (n = 42), patients with clinical CR-PR (n = 25) showed significantly better 3-year OS than those who responded poorly to dCRT (stable or progressive) (n = 17) (67.5% vs. 0%, P < 0.001). In the SALV group (n = 31), curative SALV (n = 22, 73%) provided significantly better 3-year OS than non-curative SALV (58.7% vs. 0%, P < 0.001). Multivariable analysis revealed stenosis before dCRT (P = 0.02) and pretreatment elevated CRP (P = 0.02) to be independently associated with poor outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

The multimodal treatment strategy combining dCRT and SALV is rational for treating cT4 ESCC patients. When curative resection is feasible, SALV can provide good long-term survival outcome for patients who responded to dCRT but did not achieve clinical CR with dCRT alone.

Feasibility of extended chemoradiotherapy plus surgery for patients with cT4b esophageal carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Treatment of cT4b esophageal carcinoma usually consists of definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT). However, outcome after dCRT in these patients is poor. Whether surgery should have a place in the treatment of cT4b esophageal cancer is still subject to debate. Goal of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of esophagectomy after extended chemoradiotherapy in patients with cT4b esophageal cancer.

METHODS

Patients with cT4b esophageal carcinoma, as determined by endoscopic ultrasound and (PET-)CT, were eligible for this phase-2 study. Patients were treated with weekly carboplatin + paclitaxel with 50.4 Gy radiotherapy in 28 fractions for 5.5 weeks followed by an explorative thoracotomy and esophagectomy if deemed feasible.

RESULTS

From July 2011 through March 2013, 16 patients were enrolled. Five patients did not undergo surgery because of detection of distant metastases during/after CRT (n = 3), unwillingness to undergo surgery (n = 1) or death before start of CRT (n = 1). Of the 13 patients who completed CRT, 3 patients experienced major hematologic toxicity (grade 3). A radical (R0) resection was achieved in 9 of 11 patients. Postoperative complications occurred in 9 patients. A reoperation was performed in 2 patients and 2 patients died in hospital after surgery. Three patients developed recurrent disease (1 locoregional and 2 systemic) after a mean interval of 17 months. Median overall survival of all included patients was 14.3 months.

CONCLUSIONS

In certain patients with cT4b esophageal carcinoma a radical resection can be accomplished after chemoradiotherapy. However, this treatment is associated with considerable complications and should therefore be reserved for physically fit patients.

NETHERLANDS TRIAL REGISTER NUMBER

NTR3060.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with irinotecan and nedaplatin in a single cycle followed by esophagectomy on cT4 resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a prospective nonrandomized trial for short-term outcomes

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) significantly extends survival in advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), but the short-term outcomes for cT4 ESCC remain controversial. Many NAC regimens have been previously reported, although no study has reported a regimen of irinotecan and nedaplatin for cT4 potential resectable ESCC. We evaluated the short-term outcomes of NAC with irinotecan and nedaplatin in a single cycle followed by esophagectomy on cT4 resectable ESCC. A total of 51 patients with cT4 potentially resectable ESCC were eligible for this study. Twenty of these patients underwent NAC, and the other 31 patients underwent surgery alone. The toxicities and response of NAC were evaluated. The clinicopathologic characteristics, responses, toxicities, surgical outcomes, postoperative complications, and survival time between the two groups were analyzed. No significant differences were found in clinicopathologic characteristics between the groups (P > 0.05). The response rate of NAC was 75% (15/20). The differences in the long-axis diameter of the tumor and cT stage between pre- and post-NAC were significant (P < 0.05). Twenty-four toxic events occurred in 11 patients of the NAC group, and 20/24 of these were mild. The R0 resection rates in the NAC group and the surgery alone group were 85% and 64.5%, with no statistically significant difference (P > 0.05). Differences in the pathological T stage and pathological tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) stage were significant (P < 0.05). The overall survival (OS) time and mortality in the NAC group versus the surgery alone group were 31.57 ± 3.06 months versus 15.24 ± 1.46 months and 25% versus 61.3%, respectively. The differences in OS and mortality were significant (P < 0.05). The NAC group and R0 resection were significant and independent predictors of positive prognosis. NAC with irinotecan and nedaplatin in a single cycle followed by esophagectomy on cT4 resectable ESCC as a new NAC is safe and effective.

Treatment and clinical outcome of clinical T4 esophageal cancer: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Survival of patients with cT4 esophageal cancer is dismal. Although the optimal treatment strategy remains to be established, two treatment options are available for cT4 esophageal cancers: definitive chemoradiation (dCRT) and induction treatment followed by conversion surgery (CS). However, little is known concerning the differences in clinical outcome between patients with T4 esophageal tumors treated with dCRT and those eventually treated with CS.

METHODS

A systematic search of the scientific literature on PubMed/MEDLINE was carried out using the keywords "T4 esophageal cancer," "invading (involving) adjacent organ," "definitive chemoradiation," "induction therapy," "salvage surgery," and "conversion surgery," obtaining 28 reports published up to July 2018.

RESULTS/CONCLUSION

We found that CS was superior to dCRT with respect to local disease control and short-term survival; however, CS was associated with relatively higher perioperative mortality and morbidity. Alternatively, although dCRT might often cause fistula formation, a clinical complete response to dCRT is likely to lead to a better prognosis. Recent advances in chemotherapeutic agents have led to triple induction chemotherapy, with docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil (DCF), which has shown promise as an initial induction treatment for cT4 esophageal cancer. Indeed, this regimen could control both local and systemic disease, which enables curative resection without preoperative CRT. Moreover, some appropriate changes in perioperative management and intensive systemic chemotherapy might enhance patient outcome. Randomized controlled trials with a large sample size are needed to establish the standard treatment for cT4 esophageal cancer.

Prognostic Factors of Salvage Esophagectomy for Residual or Recurrent Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma After Definitive Chemoradiotherapy

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to confirm prognostic factors for salvage esophagectomy for remnant or recurrent esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after definitive chemoradiotherapy.

STUDY DESIGN

We retrospectively analyzed clinicopathological backgrounds of 50 patients who underwent salvage esophagectomy between April 2005 and January 2016. Salvage esophagectomy comprised 40 three-incision esophagectomies, two transhiatal esophagectomies and eight pharyngolaryngoesophagectomies. Independent prognostic factors for overall survival were assessed using Cox regression analysis of the factors.

RESULTS

Salvage esophagectomy remains a highly invasive surgery and correlated with a higher incidence of all morbidities of Clavien-Dindo classification (CDc) ≥II, severe morbidities of CDc ≥ IIIb, any pulmonary morbidities and chylorrhea, compared with those in patients without preoperative definitive chemoradiotherapy. Cox regression analysis suggested that R0 resection (hazard ratio [HR] 6.39; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.03-9.68, P = 0.002), absence of severe complications (HR 4.97; 95% CI 1.70-14.81, P = 0.004) and early pStage (0-II) (HR 3.42; 95% CI 1.24-10.12, P = 0.018) were independent prognostic factors for salvage esophagectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

Salvage esophagectomy remains correlated with a high incidence of postoperative complications. Avoiding non-curative surgery and reducing the incidence of severe postoperative complications are important if patients are to receive prognostic benefit of this highly invasive surgery.

Long-Term Outcome of Definitive Chemoradiotherapy and Induction Chemoradiotherapy Followed by Surgery for T4 Esophageal Cancer with Tracheobronchial Invasion

BACKGROUND

T4 esophageal cancer (EC) that invades the trachea or bronchus often has poorer prognosis than other T4 ECs. We investigated the long-term results of definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) or induction chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery (iCRT-S) in patients with T4 EC with tracheobronchial invasion (TBI).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From 2003 to 2013, 71 patients with T4 EC with TBI were treated in our institution; 58 underwent dCRT, and 13 underwent iCRT-S. The long-term results associated with survival were retrospectively analyzed, and prognostic factors were examined by univariable and multivariable analysis.

RESULTS

The 1-, 2-, and 5-year overall survival for all patients with T4 EC with TBI treated by dCRT or iCRT-S was 57, 29, and 19%, respectively. Multivariable analysis revealed that clinical lymph node (LN) metastasis and the treatment period were significant prognostic factors. Clinical LN positivity had significantly poorer prognosis than LN negativity. The treatment outcome in the later period was significantly better than that in the earlier period. In particular, the outcome after dCRT revealed significantly better prognosis in the later compared with the earlier period, whereas the outcome after iCRT-S did not show such a difference. With respect to treatment modality, no significant difference in survival was observed between dCRT and iCRT-S.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical LN negativity and later treatment period were significantly good prognostic factors for T4 EC with TBI. The recent improvements in dCRT outcomes may help to achieve survival comparable to that of iCRT-S.

Clinical application of oral meglumine diatrizoate esophagogram in screening esophageal fistula during radiotherapy for esophageal cancer

INTRODUCTION

Esophageal fistula is a serious and common complication of radiotherapy for esophageal cancer. Therefore, early diagnosis and treatment is necessary. Because of side effect of barium esophagography, it cannot be used to screening esophageal fistula during radiotherapy. Meglumine diatrizoate is an ionic contrast agent, its adverse reactions were rarely seen when it was used in the body cavity. The purpose of this trial is identified the sensitivity and specificity of oral meglumine diatrizoate in an esophagogram for screening esophageal fistula during radiotherapy.

METHODS/DESIGN

This trial was a prospective, multicenter, diagnostic clinical trial. A total of 105 patients with esophageal cancer will swallowed meglumine diatrizoate and underwent a radiographic examination weekly during radiotherapy, medical personnel observed the esophageal lesions to determine whether an esophageal fistula formed. If an esophageal fistula was observed, esophagofiberoscopy and/or computer tomography was used to further confirm the diagnosis. And the sensitivity and specificity of meglumine diatrizoate should be calculated for screening esophageal fistula during radiotherapy.

DISCUSSION

To our knowledge, this study protocol is the first to identify the sensitivity and specificity of oral meglumine diatrizoate in an esophagogram for screening esophageal fistula during radiotherapy. If oral meglumine diatrizoate can be used to screening esophageal fistula, more patients will benefit from early detection and treatment.

Utility of initial induction chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil, cisplatin, and docetaxel (DCF) for T4 esophageal cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis

Although no consensus is available on the treatment of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) invading adjacent organs (T4), establishing effective induction treatments is crucial to altering an unresectable status and achieving curative resection. Here, we evaluated the efficacy of chemotherapy using 5-fluorouracil, cisplatin, and docetaxel (DCF) as the initial induction treatment for T4 ESCC. Fifty patients without distant metastasis who underwent initial induction chemotherapy using DCF for T4 ESCC were propensity score-matched with 50 patients who underwent radiotherapy concurrent with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (CRT). In the DCF group, 24 (48.0%) patients underwent surgery, achieving a 64% clinical response rate compared to 72.0% for induction CRT. CRT was also performed in another 24 (48.0%) patients in the DCF group in whom surgical resection was not indicated. The DCF group had significantly higher overall resectability than the CRT group (78.0% vs. 48.0%, P = 0.0017). The esophageal perforation rate during induction treatments was significantly lower in the DCF group than the CRT group (4.0% vs. 18.0%, P = 0.0205). Prognosis was significantly better in the DCF group than the CRT group (5-year cancer-specific survival 42.1% vs. 22.2%, P = 0.0146). Thus, induction DCF chemotherapy in patients with T4 ESCC reduced esophageal perforation and increased overall resectability, leading to better survival than CRT alone. Therefore, DCF chemotherapy may be an effective and safe option for initial induction treatment of T4 ESCC.

Treatment results of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by radical esophagectomy in patients with initially inoperable thoracic esophageal cancer

PURPOSE

We evaluated the effectiveness of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by esophagectomy for cT4 esophageal cancer or lymph node metastases (LNM) invading adjacent structures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated 42 consecutive patients with thoracic esophageal cancer who underwent CRT followed by esophagectomy between 2008 and 2013. All were initially considered to be unresectable because of cT4 (n = 32) disease or LN invasion (n = 10). Radiotherapy was administered at 41.4 Gy/23 fr with concurrent chemotherapy. At completion of CRT, restaging was performed using computed tomography (CT).

RESULTS

All cT4 tumors were downstaged, LNM invading to adjacent structures were considered to be released, and subtotal esophagectomy was performed. The median follow-up period was 42 months. The curative resection (R0) rate was 94% in cT4 group and 70% in LN invasion group. The 3-year overall survival (OS) and 3-year locoregional control (LRC) rates were 65-80% in the cT4 group and 50-67% in LN invasion group, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The cT4 group showed good rates of R0, OS, and LRC. Surgical resection should be an effective option when downstaging is achieved by CRT for patients with initially inoperable thoracic esophageal cancer.

Importance of positron emission tomography for assessing the response of primary and metastatic lesions to induction treatments in T4 esophageal cancer

BACKGROUND

There is no consensus strategy for treatment of T4 esophageal cancer, and because of this, a better evaluation of treatment response is crucial to establish personalized therapies. This study aimed to establish a useful system for evaluating treatment response in T4 esophageal cancer.

METHODS

This study included 130 patients with cT4 esophageal cancer without distant metastasis who underwent ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography before and after a series of induction treatments comprising chemoradiation or chemotherapy. We evaluated the maximal standardized uptake value and treatment response.

RESULTS

The mean ± standard deviation of standardized uptake value in the primary tumor before and after induction treatments were 13.8 ± 4.4 and 5.4 ± 4.1, respectively, and the mean standardized uptake value decrease was 58.4%. The most significant difference in survival between positron emission tomography-primary tumor responders and nonresponders was at a decrease of 60% standardized uptake value, based on every 10% stepwise cutoff analysis (2-year cause-specific survival: 60.2 vs 23.5%; hazard ratio = 2.705; P < .0001). With this cutoff value, the resectability (P = .0307), pathologic response (P = .0004), and pT stage (P < .0001) were associated with positron emission tomography-primary tumor response. Univariate analysis of 2-year cause-specific survival indicated a correlation between cause-specific survival and clinical stages according to TNM classification, esophageal perforation, positron emission tomography-primary tumor response, lymph node status evaluated by positron emission tomography before and after induction treatments, and operative resection. Multivariate analysis further identified positron emission tomography-primary tumor response (hazard ratio = 2.354; P = .0107), lymph node status evaluated by positron emission tomography after induction treatments (hazard ratio = 1.966; P = .0089), and operative resection (hazard ratio = 2.012; P = .0245) as independent prognostic predictors.

CONCLUSION

Positron emission tomography evaluation of the response of primary and metastatic lesions to induction treatments is important to formulate treatment strategies for cT4 esophageal cancer.

Is 18F-FDG-PET useful for predicting R0 resection after induction therapy for initially unresectable locally advanced esophageal carcinoma?

OBJECTIVE

Induction therapy followed by surgery is a promising strategy for esophageal cancer patients with invasion of the trachea/bronchus or aorta. However, no diagnostic criteria have been established to diagnose whether R0 resection can be performed. We investigated whether ¹⁸F-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography (¹⁸F-FDG-PET) and other modalities are useful for predicting R0 resection.

METHODS

Fifty-seven patients with esophageal cancer invading the trachea/bronchus or aorta who underwent induction therapy followed by surgery were enrolled. We divided the participants into two groups, an R0 resection group (n = 43) and a non-R0 resection group (n = 14), and then compared the between-group results of three modalities, including computed tomography (CT), endoscopy and ¹⁸F-FDG-PET, before and after induction therapy.

RESULTS

The post-maximal standardized uptake value (SUV_max) after induction therapy in the R0 resection group was significantly lower than that in the non-R0 resection group (4.4 vs. 6.6, p = 0.005). The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that the cut-off value for the post-SUV_max based on ¹⁸F-FDG-PET prediction of R0 resection was 4.7. Furthermore, a tumor reduction rate of ≥44% on CT, no residual stenosis, and no deep ulcer on endoscopy were associated with R0 resection after induction therapy (p = 0.002, p = 0.091, and p = 0.059, respectively). Multivariate logistic analyses revealed that the tumor reduction rate on CT and post-SUV_max <4.7 in ¹⁸F-FDG-PET were independent factors for R0 resection.

CONCLUSIONS

The post-SUV_max determined by ¹⁸F-FDG-PET and the volume reduction rate based on CT scans were useful for predicting R0 resection after induction therapy for initially unresectable locally advanced esophageal carcinoma.

Role of definitive chemoradiotherapy using docetaxel and 5-fluorouracil in patients with unresectable locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a phase II study

Definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) with docetaxel (DOC) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) is a unique regimen for esophageal cancer. In this prospective phase II study, antitumor effect and safety of CRT using DOC and 5-FU for inoperable locally advanced esophageal cancer were evaluated. DOC 7.5 mg/m² was infused on days 1, 8, 22, and 29. 5-FU 250 mg/m² /day was infused continuously on days 1-5, 8-12, 15-19, 22-26, 29-33, 36-40, and 43-45. Radiotherapy was given to 66 Gy in 33 fractions. Eleven patients with thoracic and five with cervical esophageal cancer were eligible. All patients had esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). The response rate was 94%, with complete response in five patients (31%) and partial response in 10 (63%). Hematologic toxicity was mild; only one patient (6%) had Grade 1 leukopenia. Nonhematologic Grade 3 or higher adverse events were esophagitis (31%), anorexia (6%), and esophago-bronchial fistula (6%). No treatment-related deaths occurred. The median time to progression was 20 months and overall 3-year and 5-year survival were 44% and 31%, respectively. Definitive CRT using DOC and 5-FU could be performed safely, and it demonstrated a favorable antitumor effect for ESCC. This regimen might be indicated in patients in whom it is desirable to avoid myelosuppression and progression of renal impairment.

Involved-field irradiation in definitive chemoradiotherapy for T4 squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus

OBJECTIVES

Definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (ccrt) is currently a therapeutic option for locally advanced esophageal cancer. However, clinical practice differs with respect to the target volume for irradiation. The purpose of the present study was to analyze failure patterns and survival, and to determine the feasibility of using involved-field irradiation (ifi) with concurrent chemotherapy for T4 squamous cell carcinoma (scc) of the esophagus.

METHODS

Between January 2003 and January 2013, 56 patients with clinical T4M0 scc of the esophagus received ccrt using ifi. The radiation field included the primary tumour and clinically involved lymph nodes. Target volumes and sites of failure were analyzed, as were treatment-related toxicity and survival time.

RESULTS

In this 56-patient cohort, 13 patients (23.2%) achieved a complete response, and 21 (37.5%) achieved a partial response, for a total response rate of 60.7%. The major toxicities experienced were leucocytopenia and esophagitis, with 14 patients (25.0%) experiencing grade 3 toxicities. At a median follow-up of 34 months, 48 patients (85.7%) had experienced failure: 39 (69.6%) in-field, 7 (12.5%) elective nodal, and 19 (33.9%) distant. Only 1 patient (1.8%) experienced isolated elective nodal failure. The 1-, 2-, and 3-year survival rates were 39.3%, 21.4%, and 12.5% respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with T4M0 scc of the esophagus, definitive ccrt using ifi resulted in an acceptable rate of isolated elective nodal failure and an overall survival comparable to that achieved with elective nodal irradiation. A limited radiation therapy target volume, including only clinically involved lesions, would therefore be a feasible choice for this patient subgroup.

Is the outcome of a salvage surgery for T4 thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma really poor?

BACKGROUND

Among patients with T4 thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (TESCC), it is unclear whether the outcomes of late responders who undergo high-dose chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by salvage esophagectomy differs from those of early responders who undergo low-dose CRT followed by esophagectomy.

METHODS

A total of 153 patients with T4 TESCC were treated with CRT. The first evaluation was performed after 40 Gy of CRT for downstaging. Of these, 28 patients could be downstaged, and underwent subsequent surgery (early responders). For the remaining patients, additional CRT was administered, and patients were re-evaluated after treatment and underwent salvage surgery. In total, 40 patients (early + late responders) were analyzed.

RESULTS

The primary tumors exhibited a grade 3 response in six (21.4 %) of the early responders and two (16.7 %) of the late responders (p = 1.000). The rate of residual tumor in the primary tumor was 80 % (32/40 patients). The proportions of resected lymph nodes and positive metastatic nodes were similar between early and late responders (p = 0.406 and p = 0.859, respectively). The 5-year overall survival rates among the early and late responders were 25.9 and 36.5 %, respectively, and the median survival times were 24.8 and 24.3 months (p = 0.925), respectively. The 5-year cause-specific survival rates in the early and late responder groups were 61.5 and 72.9 % (p = 0.425), respectively.

CONCLUSION

The outcomes of both early and late responders to CRT were similar, and salvage surgery for T4 TESCC outweighs the risks in patients with T4 TESCC.

Chemoradiotherapy and surgery for T4 esophageal cancer in Japan

Esophageal cancer is thought to be the most malignant neoplasm due to its biological aggressiveness. The most effective treatment modality for esophageal cancer, particularly T4 esophageal cancer, is chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Some T4 patients show long-term survival after receiving CRT, suggesting that even T4 esophageal cancer can be cured with this modality. Although surgery is performed after CRT in some T4 cases, its prognostic benefit is controversial. In this paper, we review the status of CRT and conversion surgery as well as the development of new regimens and discuss the future prospects of CRT in the treatment of T4 esophageal cancer in Japan.

Induction chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy followed by radical esophagectomy for T4 esophageal cancer: results of a prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

We hypothesized that the survival rate of patients undergoing R0 esophagectomy after induction chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy for unresectable T4 esophageal cancer (URT4) would be similar to that of patients undergoing esophagectomy for immediately resectable esophageal cancer with no unfavorable prognostic factors (RNU).

METHODS

Between April 2002 and June 2012, 87 of 283 patients with esophageal cancer who presented at the University Hospital of the Ryukyus were enrolled in this prospective cohort study. Tumors were classified as RNU and URT4 in 44 and 43 of the 87 patients, respectively. Outcomes of treatment for URT4 patients were compared with those of RNU patients.

RESULTS

The R0 resection rate (61 %) and in-hospital mortality rate (20 %) of URT4 patients were significantly poorer than those of RNU patients (98 and 2.3 %, respectively), although the morbidity rate was similar in the two groups (63 and 52 %, respectively). The 5-year survival rate (35 %) of URT4 patients was significantly poorer than that of RNU patients (67 %) in the intention-to-treat analysis. However, no significant difference was noted between the two survival curves for cases of R0 resection (5-year survival rate, 60 % vs. 69 %). Multivariate analysis revealed R status as the only significant independent prognostic factor for URT4 patients (P < 0.001; hazard ratio = 8.279).

CONCLUSIONS

Satisfactory survival rates can be achieved if R0 resection is performed after induction treatment in patients with T4 esophageal cancer, although secondary radical esophagectomy is associated with a higher risk of in-hospital mortality.

A history of surgery for locally-advanced (T4) cancer of the thoracic esophagus in Japan and a personal perspective

The history of esophageal surgery in Japan can be divided into three periods, an era of safety from 1930 to 1980, an era of radicality from 1980 to 2000, and the era of quality of life (QOL) from 2000 to the present. The treatment for T4 cancers of the thoracic esophagus has also changed over time from preoperative radiotherapy, combined resection of the neighboring organs with esophagectomy, and to definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) with salvage surgery. At present, almost all patients with an unresectable T4 esophageal cancer receives dCRT. However, there are many patients with a residual or recurrent tumor after dCRT. Salvage surgery for such patients often results in incomplete resection of the tumor because the tumor involves the trachea and/or aorta. New techniques to enable the resection of such neighboring organs even during salvage surgery are needed. In the future, the mainstay of treatment for esophageal cancer will be CRT with the foreseeable progress in new drugs and new techniques of radiotherapy. Surgery will be indicated for a local failure after CRT, while combined resection of the neighboring organs will be necessary to treat a local failure after CRT for T4 cancers. New surgical techniques have to be developed through some application of new devices and equipment.

Esophageal bypass operation prior to definitive chemoradiotherapy in advanced esophageal cancer with tracheobronchial invasion

BACKGROUND

In T4 esophageal cancer with tracheobronchial invasion, an esophagorespiratory fistula (ERF) often occurs during or after chemoradiotherapy. We have performed esophageal bypass operations prior to definitive chemoradiotherapy for these patients to increase the chemoradiotherapy completion rate by minimizing the potential effect of an ERF. The aim of this study was to examine the clinical outcome of esophageal bypass surgery prior to chemoradiotherapy.

METHODS

Between 1997 and 2010, 17 patients underwent esophageal bypass surgery followed by definitive chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer with tracheobronchial invasion (bypass group). Ten patients in the same circumstances were treated with chemoradiotherapy alone (control group). Overall survival, the clinical effect of chemoradiotherapy, the ERF incidence rate, and the safety of esophageal bypass surgery were assessed.

RESULTS

The overall response rate to chemoradiotherapy was 64.7% in the bypass group and 90.0% in the control group. Except for 2 patients with ERF at initial diagnosis, 4 (26.7%) of the 15 patients developed ERF in the bypass group, and 3 (30.0%) of the 10 patients developed ERF in the control group during or after chemoradiotherapy. The 2-year and 3-year overall survival rates were 17.6% and 17.6% in the bypass group and 20.0% and 0% in the control group, respectively (p = 0.924); long-term survival of more than 3 years was seen only in the bypass group.

CONCLUSIONS

Esophageal bypass surgery prior to definitive chemoradiotherapy could be performed safely, and this strategy contributed to long-term survival in the patients who achieved a good response to chemoradiotherapy but developed an ERF.

Perioperative therapy for locally advanced gastroesophageal cancer: current controversies and consensus of care

Gastroesophageal cancer (GEC) remains a challenging problem in oncology. Anatomically, GEC is comprised of distal gastric adenocarcinoma (GC), classically associated with Helicobacter Pylori, while proximal esophagogastric adenocarcinoma (EGJ AC) has increased significantly in incidence over the past years. Despite contrasting etiologies, histologies, and molecular phenotypes of distal and proximal GEC, in many cases perioperative (and metastatic) treatment strategies converge to similar approaches. For patients undergoing curative intent surgery, advances in perioperative chemotherapy and/or chemoradiotherapy, either before and/or after surgery, have demonstrated improved survivals compared to surgery alone. This review focuses on how the 'boundary' of the Z-line and/or the anatomical distinction of 'proximal' (EGJ) vs. 'distal' (GC) cancer has led to diverse inclusion/exclusion criteria for clinical trial enrollment, embodying various combinations of chemotherapy and radiation before and/or after surgery. Supporting evidence of each of these approaches consequently has led to a number of varying practices by geographical region and Institution/Physician, based on differing experience, preference, and clinical circumstance. Adequate direct comparison of these approaches is lacking currently, but data from a number of concerted efforts should be available in the next years to further direct best standards of care. Introduction of biologically targeted agents, namely anti-angiogenics and anti-HER family therapeutics are being evaluated to determine whether further therapeutic gains can be realized over classic cytotoxic chemotherapy alone (with/without radiotherapy). To date, novel molecularly targeted agents have yet to demonstrate benefit in this setting. In the following comprehensive review we will address the intricacies of perioperative treatment of locally advanced GEC, with focus on clinical trials supporting the diverse set of perioperative multidisciplinary approaches.

Management of advanced-stage operable esophageal cancer

The incidence of esophageal cancer is increasing in the developed world, with a relative increase in adenocarcinoma compared with squamous cell carcinoma. The distensible nature of the esophagus results in delayed development of symptoms associated with esophageal cancer; hence many patients have locally advanced or metastatic cancer at the time of initial presentation. Although resection remains the treatment of choice for early-stage esophageal cancer, the best treatment strategy for locally advanced esophageal cancer is debatable and, consequently, varies at different centers. This article discusses the published literature on various available therapeutic options for the treatment of locally advanced esophageal cancer.

Cetuximab plus cisplatin, irinotecan, and thoracic radiotherapy as definitive treatment for locally advanced, unresectable esophageal cancer: a phase-II study of the SWOG (S0414)

INTRODUCTION

The specific aims of the study were to evaluate the 2-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), toxicity profile, and best objective response rate in patients with locally advanced, clinically unresectable esophageal cancer receiving cetuximab, cisplatin, irinotecan, and thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) within a multi-institutional cooperative-group setting.

METHODS

Eligible patients (cT4 M0 or medically unresectable, biopsy proven, and noncervical esophageal cancer) were to receive four 21-day cycles of cetuximab 400 mg/m (day 1, cycle 1), cetuximab 250 mg/m (day 8, 15, cycle 1; then days 1, 8, and 15 for subsequent cycles), cisplatin 30 mg/m (days 1 and 8, all cycles), and irinotecan 65 mg/m (days 1 and 8, all cycles). TRT was administered at 1.8 Gy in 28 daily fractions to a total dose of 50.4 Gy, to begin with on day 1 of cycle 3. The primary endpoint was 2-year OS, with an accrual goal of 75 patients with adenocarcinoma.

RESULTS

The study was closed because of slow accrual, with 21 eligible patients (11 squamous, 10 adenocarcinoma) enrolled from May 2005 to September 2007. Two-year OS and PFS (95% confidence interval [CI]) were 33.3% (14.6-57.0%) and 23.8% (8.2-47.2%), respectively. Kaplan-Meier estimates of median (95% CI) OS and PFS were 11.2 (6.4-43.6) and 6.4 (3.7-12.0) months, respectively. The overall response rate (95% CI) among 17 evaluable patients was 17.6% (3.8-43.4%), including 6% confirmed complete responders and 12% unconfirmed partial responders. Two deaths resulted from protocol treatment (sudden death and gastrointestinal necrosis). Ten (47.6%) and 6 (28.6%) patients had grade-3 or -4 toxicity, respectively: 52.4% were hematologic, 23.8% had fatigue, 19.0% had nausea, 19.0% had dehydration, and 19.0% had anorexia.

CONCLUSIONS

Concomitant cetuximab, cisplatin, irinotecan, and TRT were poorly tolerated in the first North American cooperative group trial testing this regimen for locally advanced esophageal cancer as treatment-related mortality approached 10%. Single-institution phase-II cetuximab-based combined modality trials have yielded encouraging results in preliminary analyses. The SWOG GI Committee endorses enrollment to open clinical trials to clarify the therapeutic ratio of cetuximab-based combined modality approaches for esophageal cancer.

Treatment of T4 esophageal cancer. Definitive chemo-radiotherapy vs chemo-radiotherapy followed by surgery

The outcome of patients with T4 esophageal cancer, defined as a tumor that invades neighboring structures (e.g., aorta, trachea, bronchus, and lung), is extremely poor. Despite recent advances in surgical techniques, these tumors are usually considered inoperable. Two distinct therapeutic options are currently available for T4 esophageal cancers: chemo-radiotherapy followed by surgery (CRT-S), which comprises esophagectomy following down-staging of the tumor by CRT, and definitive chemo-radiotherapy (D-CRT), which is designed to avoid esophagectomy by using maximum doses of irradiation. CRT-S is superior to D-CRT with respect to local control and short-term survival although CRT-S is associated with relatively higher perioperative mortality and morbidity. On the other hand, it is sometimes difficult to achieve local control with D-CRT and the treatment often results in fistula formation, though a complete response to CRT is often associated with better prognosis. Admittedly, the difference in the survival rate between the two modalities is marginal at long-term follow-up due to operative morbidity and inadequate control of distant metastasis in CRT-S. Changes in perioperative management and intensive systemic chemotherapy may enhance the outcome. Randomized controlled trials involving large population samples are needed to define the standard treatment for T4 esophageal cancer.