Review article: refractory distal colitis -- explanations and options

Refractory distal ulcerative colitis: Clinical manifestations and treatment

AIM: To investigate the clinical features and treatment of distal ulcerative colitis (DUC) and to analyze probable reasons and optimal therapeutic regimens for refractory DUC.

METHODS: Clinical data for 145 DUC patients who were treated at the Affiliated Yijishan Hospital of Wannan Medical College from January 2005 to December 2011 were retrospectively analyzed. Based on the response to traditional treatments, the patients were divided into either an effective group or a refractory group. The two groups were compared in clinical and laboratory examination results to analyze probable reasons and optimal therapeutic regimens for refractory DUC.

RESULTS: Of 145 DUC patients, 117 were eligible for evaluation, and 26 of 117 patients were confirmed to have refractory DUC. The percentages of patients with abdominal distention and abdominal pain or elevated white blood cell count differed significantly between the refractory group and effective group (42.3% vs 22.0%, P = 0.038; 30.8% vs 12.1%, P = 0.035), while no significant differences were found in bloody stools, diarrhea, extraintestinal manifestations, C-reactive protein, blood sedimentation between the two groups (all P > 0.05). Of all 117 cases, 43 were found to have rectitis (including 10 refractory cases), and 74 were found to have sigmoiditis (including 16 refractory cases). No significant difference was found between the two groups in the location of the lesions (P > 0.05). Of 26 refractory cases, only 1 was treated by surgery, and the others were treated by intravenous hormone therapy, addition of new dosage form of 5-ASA, or proper laxatives to gain relief.

CONCLUSION: Diarrhea and bloody stools are the most common clinical symptoms of DUC. Significantly elevated leukocyte count can be expected to be an important factor for evaluating treatment outcome of DUC. Refractory DUC can be treated by intensification therapy, addition of new dosage form of 5-ASA, proper laxatives, or surgery to gain relief.

Diarrhea in chronic inflammatory bowel diseases

Diarrhea is a common clinical feature of inflammatory bowel diseases and may be accompanied by abdominal pain, urgency, and fecal incontinence. The pathophysiology of diarrhea in these diseases is complex, but defective absorption of salt and water by the inflamed bowel is the most important mechanism involved. In addition to inflammation secondary to the disease, diarrhea may arise from a variety of other conditions. It is important to differentiate the pathophysiologic mechanisms involved in the diarrhea in the individual patient to provide the appropriate therapy. This article reviews microscopic colitis, ulcerative colitis, and Crohn's disease, focusing on diarrhea.

Ulcerative proctitis: a review of pharmacotherapy and management

BACKGROUND

Ulcerative proctitis (UP) is a common presentation of ulcerative colitis (UC).

OBJECTIVE

To summarize available literature on up-to-date management and pharmacotherapy of UP patients.

METHODS

Extensive Medline/Embase literature search was performed to identify relevant articles.

RESULTS/CONCLUSION

Topical medication with rectally administered 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA)/corticosteroid suppositories or enemas is effective treatment for most UP patients. Locally administered 5-ASA is more efficacious than oral compounds. The combination of topical 5-ASA and oral 5-ASA or topical steroids should be considered for escalation of treatment. Maintenance treatment is indicated in all UC cases. 5-ASA suppositories are suggested as first-line maintenance therapy if accepted by patients, although oral 5-ASA as maintenance therapy might prevent proximal extension of the disease. After re-assessment, chronically active patients refractory or intolerant to 5-ASAs and corticosteroids may require immunomodulators or biological therapy. Exceptional cases may require a proctocolectomy.

Expression of cytochrome P450 and MDR1 in patients with proctitis

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of inflammation on the gene expression of three cytochrome P450's (CYP) and P-glycoprotein (P-gp) in the rectal and colonic mucosa in patients with proctitis.

METHODS

Biopsies were obtained from inflamed and normal mucosa in association with routine sigmoidoscopy in patients with proctitis. The biopsies were snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen. Real time PCR (polymerase chain reaction) was used for quantitative analyses of mRNA specific for the CYP2E1, CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 gene and the MDR1 genes. Values were normalised based on gene expression of beta-actin to enable comparisons between samples.

RESULTS

The gene expression of CYP2E1 and CYP3A4 was lower in mucosa with severe inflammation vs normal mucosa (p<0.05). For CYP3A5 and P-gp there was no significant difference when comparing normal and inflammatory changed mucosa.

CONCLUSION

Our study suggests that at least for some of the CYP enzymes the expression decreases in response to the inflammatory process in the gastrointestinal tract.

Medical management of left-sided ulcerative colitis and ulcerative proctitis: critical evaluation of therapeutic trials

BACKGROUND

The goal of this work was to critically evaluate the published studies on the treatment of ulcerative proctitis (UP) and left-sided ulcerative colitis (L-UC). The results of this review provided the content for the accompanying treatment guidelines, Clinical Guidelines for the Medical Management of Left-sided Ulcerative Colitis and Ulcerative Proctitis: Summary Statement.

METHODS

All English language articles published between 1995 and September 2005 were identified through a comprehensive literature search using OVID and PubMed. The quality of the data supporting or rejecting the use of specific therapies was categorized by a data quality grading scale. An "A+" grade was assigned to treatment supported by multiple high-quality randomized controlled trials with consistent results, whereas a "D" grade was given to therapy supported only by expert opinion. The therapeutic efficacy of a treatment was defined by its success in treating UP and L-UC compared with placebo. A medication was ranked as "excellent" if it was specifically studied for UP and L-UC and had consistently positive results compared with placebo or another agent. Quality and efficacy scores were agreed on by author consensus.

RESULTS

For the acute treatment of UP or L-UC, the rectally administered corticosteroids and mesalazine (5-ASA), either alone or in combination with oral 5-ASAs, are the most effective therapy: evidence quality, A+; efficacy, excellent. Only rectally administered 5-ASA received an A+/excellent rating for maintenance of remission. Infliximab received an A+ grade for induction and maintenance of remission but only a "good" rating because the studies were performed in all UC, not specifically UP or L-UC.

CONCLUSIONS

This critical evaluation of treatment provides a "report card" on medications available for the management of patients with UP and L-UC. The guidelines should provide a useful reference and supplement for physicians treating UC patients.

Clinical guidelines for the medical management of left-sided ulcerative colitis and ulcerative proctitis: summary statement

There are few published guidelines for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease. Physicians choose therapy based on evidence-based data, peer and expert opinion, and personal experience. This article provides treatment guidelines for the induction and maintenance of ulcerative proctitis and left-sided colitis and the management of disease refractory to 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) compounds and corticosteroids The guidelines are derived from evidence-based data and, when lacking, expert opinion or the authors' experience. The comprehensive review of the literature is presented in the accompanying article, "The Medical Management of Left-Sided Ulcerative Colitis and Ulcerative Proctitis: Critical Evaluation of Therapeutic Trials". Rectally administered 5-ASA and corticosteroid suppositories are effective treatment for most ulcerative proctitis patients. Corticosteroid and 5-ASA enemas, which reach the splenic flexure of the colon, are recommended for patients with left-sided ulcerative colitis. The combination of rectally administered 5-ASA enemas and oral 5-ASA agents may afford better treatment of left-sided colitis and possibly prevent proximal extension of disease. Patients refractory to 5-ASAs and corticosteroids may require an immunomodulator or biological response modifier therapy. Those who have ongoing signs and symptoms of ulcerative proctitis and left-sided ulcerative colitis despite maximal medical therapy require a proctocolectomy.

Pharmacogenetics in inflammatory bowel disease

Pharmacogenetics is the study of the association between variability in drug response and (or) drug toxicity and polymorphisms in genes. The goal of this field of science is to adapt drugs to a patient's specific genetic background and therefore make them more efficacious and safe. In this article we describe the variants in genes that influence either the efficacy or toxicity of common drugs used in the treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), ulcerative colitis (UC), and Crohn's disease (CD) including sulfasalazine and mesalazine, azathioprine (AZA) and 6-mercaptopurine (6-MP), methotrexate (MTX), glucocorticosteroids (CSs) and infliximab. Furthermore, difficulties with pharmacogenetic studies in general and more specifically in IBD are described. Although pharmacogenetics is a promising field that already contributed to a better understanding of some of the underlying mechanisms of action of drugs used in IBD, the only discovery translated until now into daily practice is the relation between thiopurine S-methyltransferase (TPMT) gene polymorphisms and hematological toxicity of thiopurine treatment. In the future it is necessary to organize studies in well characterized patient cohorts who have been uniformly treated and systematically evaluated in order to quantitate drug response more objectively. An effort should be made to collect genomic DNA from all patients enrolled in clinical drug trials after appropriate informed consent for pharmacogenetic studies.

Diagnosis and treatment of ulcerative proctitis

Proctitis refers to inflammation of the rectum, a diagnosis made by endoscopic evaluation. Symptoms of proctitis include rectal bleeding, urgency, tenesmus, diarrhea or constipation, and occasionally rectal pain. The causes of proctitis include infection, medication, ischemia, radiation, and ulcerative proctitis. Ulcerative proctitis is an important and increasingly common subcategory of ulcerative colitis (UC) in which inflammation is limited to the rectum. Historically, oral aminosalicylates have been the mainstay of acute and maintenance therapy. A growing body of data, however, indicates that topical aminosalicylates are effective first line agents in ulcerative proctitis and distal UC. Topical aminosalicylates act more effectively and rapidly to induce and maintain remission compared with their oral counterparts or topical steroids. Rarely ulcerative proctitis is refractory to topical therapy and in these instances systemic corticosteroids, antibiotics, immunomodulators, or surgery is required. This review highlights the pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment of ulcerative proctitis.

Topical butyrate improves efficacy of 5-ASA in refractory distal ulcerative colitis: results of a multicentre trial

BACKGROUND

The treatment of distal ulcerative colitis, refractory to conventional 5-ASA/steroid treatment, is still a matter of debate. The present study aimed at confirming, with adequate statistical power, previous data indicating the usefulness of topical butyrate and 5-ASA in the treatment of this condition.

DESIGN

Double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre study. A total of 51 patients with distal (< 65 cm) ulcerative colitis, refractory to topical 5-ASA/cortisone, were randomly allocated to receive topical 5-ASA 2 g and 80 mM L-1 sodium-butyrate bid (Group A; 24 patients) or 5-ASA 2 g and 80 mL saline bid (Group B; 27 patients) for 6 weeks. Sigmoidoscopy with biopsies, as well as clinical and laboratory evaluations, were carried out at enrollment and at the end of the trial. Primary endpoints: remission or marked improvement in endoscopic, histologic and clinical findings.

RESULTS

Most parameters showed a significant improvement vs. baseline in both groups. Remission in six patients and improvement in 12 patients in Group A vs. one remission and 13 with improvement in Group B (P < 0.05). A significant difference in favour of Group A was recorded regarding the number of bowel movements (P < 0.01), urgency (P < 0.05) and the patients' self evaluation (P < 0.01).

DISCUSSION

The combined treatment with topical butyrate and 5-ASA is significantly more effective than 5-ASA alone in the management of refractory distal colitis. Further improvements in the treatment of refractory distal ulcerative colitis may be feasible based on the identification of patient subgroups and the association of two or more active drugs. Butyrate may well be one of them.

Palliative care in inflammatory bowel disease: an evidence-based approach

The management of the patient with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is challenging for both the physician and the patient. IBD imposes both a physical and emotional burden on patients' lives. Palliative care is important for IBD patients because it focuses on improving quality of life. While palliative care does not change the natural history of the disease, it provides relief from pain and other distressing symptoms. This article focuses on various aspects of care for IBD patients including pain control, management of oral and skin ulcerations, stomal problems in IBD patients, control of nausea and vomiting, management of chronic diarrhea and pruritus ani, evaluation of anemia, treatment of steroid-related bone disease, and treatment of psychological problems associated with IBD. Each of these areas is reviewed using an evidence-based approach. Evidence in category A refers to evidence from clinical trials that are randomized and well controlled. Category B Evidence refers to evidence from cohort or case-controlled studies. Category C is evidence from case reports or flawed clinical trials. Evidence from category D is limited to the clinical experience of the authors. Evidence labelled as category E refers to situations where there is insufficient evidence available to form an opinion. Algorithms for management of pain and nausea in IBD patients are presented.

Genotype-phenotype relationship in inflammatory bowel disease

Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) are chronic diseases of unknown etiology. Much effort has been made in the last years to clarify the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Data are not conclusive at the moment, but the most important known risk factor for developing IBD is a positive familial history. Genetic analyses have shown a linkage between loci on several chromosomes and IBD (IBD1 gene on chromosome 16 for CD and on chromosome 12 for UC). The association of genotype to specific phenotypes of disease could be hypothesized by the concordance of clinical characteristics in familial IBD, by the association of specific HLA haplotypes to clinically different groups of patients, and by different responses to treatment related to different polymorphisms of other chromosome 6 genes. The clinical heterogeneity of IBD has led to classifications of patients with Crohn's disease based upon clinical features (e.g. Rome and Vienna classifications) that allow the identification of subgroups of patients with similar clinical behavior. The possible drawbacks of these classifications are the lack of validation of intra-interobserver concordance, the absence of prospective evaluations, and stratification into too many subgroups. Furthermore, in our experience, clinical presentation (surgical or medical) seems to have a good correlation with prognosis, is easy identifiable, and can be applied at the time of diagnosis. In UC, extension of disease and clinical behavior correlate with prognosis. For these reasons, studies correlating genotype to phenotype should be performed to improve our knowledge of the diseases and possibly to stratify patients into different subgroups for more personalized treatments, in clinical trials and for research purposes.

Limited exposure of the healthy distal colon to orally-dosed formulation is further exaggerated in active left-sided ulcerative colitis

BACKGROUND

Active distal ulcerative colitis is often resistant to topically acting oral formulations. We speculated that the left side of the colon is underexposed to orally-dosed topical agents in patients with active distal colitis.

METHODS

Twenty-two healthy volunteers (12 males, aged 22-47 years), and 10 patients (6 males, aged 33-73 years) with active left-sided ulcerative colitis ingested a Eudragit-coated gelatine capsule containing 111In-labelled amberlite resin on four successive days. Regional colonic distribution, transit times and percentage of daily dose resident were calculated from the average of four serial gamma camera images on the 4th day.

RESULTS

(mean [95% CI]). When compared to controls, patients with colitis had significantly faster total colon transit (24.3 h [9.5-39.1] vs. 51.7 h [41.1-62.3]) as well as faster proximal colon transit (18.7 h [9.1-28.3] vs. 36.7 [28.5-44.9]), and distal colon transit (3.1 h [-0.5 to 6.8] vs. 15.0 h [10.5-19.5]), respectively (all P < 0.01). Material was asymmetrically distributed in health (proximal colon 69% [63-76] vs. distal colon 31% [24-37]). This asymmetry was more extreme in colitis, with corresponding values of 91% [85-96] vs. 9% [4-15]. As a result colitics had less material in the left-sided colon (9% [4-15] vs. 31% [24-37]), P < 0. 001. Colitics had a significantly lower percentage of the daily dose resident within the left side of the colon compared to controls (13% [-2 to 28] vs. 63% [44-81]), P < 0.01.

CONCLUSIONS

Delayed release oral formulation is asymmetrically distributed within the colon in health. This asymmetry is exaggerated in active left-sided ulcerative colitis and, together with faster colonic transit, results in reduced exposure of the distal colon to orally-dosed topical agents.

A structural comparison of lipopolysaccharides from two strains of Helicobacter pylori, of which one strain (442) does and the other strain (471) does not stimulate pepsinogen secretion

Lipopolysaccharides (LPSs) from strains of Helicobacter pylori (442 and 471), which differed in stimulation of pepsinogen secretion, were isolated as water-soluble material of high-M(r), and as water-insoluble gels of low-M(r). Chemical and spectroscopic analyses of soluble LPS and oligosaccharides liberated from the gels led to proposed structures with Lewis (Le) antigen termini connected to N -acetyllacto-saminoglycans of alternating 3-linked beta-D-Gal and 4-linked beta-D-GlcNAc residues with various laterally attached glycosyl substituents. The LPS of H.pylori 442 was similar to previously examined strains (NCTC 11637 and P466) in having partially glycosylated chains with alpha-L-Fuc units attached to O-3 of the majority of GlcNAc residues in Le(x)units, and in chain termination with Le(x)or Le(y)determinants. In contrast, terminal Le(y)units occurred in LPS of H.pylori 471 and glycosaminoglycan chains carried a smaller proportion of alpha-L-Fuc units, but at O-6 of a majority of nonfucosylated GlcNAc residues, there was a novel type of branching with alpha-D-Gal substituents. Evidence for the branched regions was obtained from(1)H-NMR spectra and from characterization of oligosaccharides formed by the action of endo-beta-galactosidase. Examination of oligosaccharides liberated from water-insoluble LPS gels of H.pylori 442 and 471 provided evidence for similar core OS structures to those from other H.pylori strains but interesting differences were observed.