Long-term results of patients with malignant carcinoid syndrome receiving octreotide LAR

The current status of somatostatin analogs in the treatment of neuroendocrine tumors and future perspectives

INTRODUCTION

Somatostatin analogs (SSAs) were developed as antisecretory agents to palliate hormonal symptoms in patients with functioning neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). Their antiproliferative activity has been established in the phase 3 PROMID and CLARINET trials. SSAs currently represent the standard first-line therapy for the majority of well-differentiated G1/G2 gastroenteropancreatic NETs as well as for pulmonary NETs.

AREAS COVERED

An update on the clinical applications of established SSAs for the treatment of NETs is provided. Perspectives on emerging nonpeptide SSAs such as paltusotine and innovative formulations of octreotide (CAM2029) are included.

EXPERT OPINION

SSAs represent the cornerstone of treatment for both functioning and nonfunctioning NETs. While standard-dose SSAs have a defined place in the therapeutic algorithm of well-differentiated NETs, uncertainties remain on how to best integrate above-label doses of SSAs in the treatment sequence, particularly when tumor control is the goal. Octreotide and lanreotide appear to be clinically interchangeable, and no signs of superiority of one agent over the other has been observed so far. Whether SSAs may be exploited in the maintenance setting following more aggressive treatments, whether continuing SSAs beyond-progression after first-line therapy could be an effective treatment strategy, and whether new-generation SSAs such as pasireotide could overcome resistance to established SSAs are key areas of investigation.

Established and novel circulating neuroendocrine tumor biomarkers for diagnostic, predictive and prognostic use

The management of neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) represents a clinical challenge due to heterogeneity of their clinical behaviour, molecular biology and response to treatment. Over the years, several circulating biomarkers have been developed for the early diagnosis and follow-up of NETs. The specific secretory products of tumors associated with a secretory syndrome (functioning tumors) may be used as diagnostic and/or prognostic biomarkers while the most common non-specific circulating biomarkers, that may be increased in both functioning and non-functioning tumors, are chromogranin A and the neuron specific enolase. However, the diagnostic accuracy as well as the prognostic and predictive value of these biomarkers are limited and novel techniques of multianalyte analysis of regulators of tumor biology have been developed. The NETest has been most extensively studied and proved to be useful in NET diagnosis, early detection of post-operative recurrence and prediction of response to treatment but further investigation establishing higher level of evidence is required for implementation in clinical practice.

Survival and Symptomatic Relief After Cytoreductive Hepatectomy for Neuroendocrine Tumor Liver Metastases: Long-Term Follow-up Evaluation of More Than 500 Patients

BACKGROUND

Distant metastases are the strongest predictor of poor prognosis for patients with neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). Cytoreductive hepatectomy (CRH) can relieve symptoms of hormonal excess and prolong survival for patients with liver metastases (NETLMs), but long-term outcomes are poorly characterized.

METHODS

This retrospective single-institution analysis analyzed patients who underwent CRH for well-differentiated NETLMs from 2000 to 2020. Kaplan-Meier analysis estimated symptom-free interval and overall and progression-free survival. Multivariable Cox regression analysis evaluated factors associated with survival.

RESULTS

The inclusion criteria were met by 546 patients. The most common primary sites were the small intestine (n = 279) and the pancreas (n = 194). Simultaneous primary tumor resection was performed for 60 % of the cases. Major hepatectomy comprised 27% of the cases, but this rate decreased during the study period (p < 0.001). Major complications occurred in 20%, and the 90-day mortality rate was 1.6%. Functional disease was present in 37 %, and symptomatic relief was achieved in 96%. The median symptom-free interval was 41 months (62 months after complete cytoreduction and 21 months with gross residual disease) (p = 0.021). The median overall survival was 122 months, and progression-free survival was 17 months. In the multivariable analysis, worse overall survival was associated with age, pancreatic primary tumor, Ki-67, number and size of lesions, and extrahepatic metastases, with Ki-67 as the strongest predictor (odds ratio [OR], 1.90 for Ki-67 [3-20%; p = 0.018] and OR, 4.25 for Ki-67 [>20%; p < 0.001]).

CONCLUSION

The study showed that CRH for NETLMs is associated with low perioperative morbidity and mortality and excellent overall survival, although the majority will experience recurrence/progression. For patients with functional tumors, CRH can provide durable symptomatic relief.

Real-World Clinical and Patient-Reported Outcomes from the Longitudinal Telotristat Ethyl Treatment Registry of Patients with Neuroendocrine Tumors

Background

Telotristat ethyl (TE) is an oral tryptophan hydroxylase inhibitor approved for the treatment of carcinoid syndrome diarrhea (CSD) in combination with somatostatin analogs (SSAs).

Methods

This prospective, observational, single-arm study evaluated long-term patient-reported outcomes for adults initiating TE in US clinical practice from 2017 through January 2022. The primary objective was satisfaction with overall CS symptom control 6 months after initiating TE. Secondary objectives evaluated satisfaction with control of CSD, flushing, and CS symptoms, as well as work productivity/activity impairment, SSA use, and weight. All analyses were descriptive in nature.

Results

A total of 223 patients completed the baseline survey; 56% also completed the 6-month follow-up survey. Mean age was 61 years and 61% were women. After 6 months of TE treatment, the majority of patients (76%, n=95/125) reported being satisfied with control of their CS symptoms which was markedly improved from baseline (41%, n=91). Similarly, the majority of patients (78%, n=97/125) were satisfied with control of their CSD after 6 months of TE, markedly improved from baseline (36%).

Conclusion

This longitudinal observational study showed improvements in real-world clinical and humanistic outcomes for patients with CS and at least 6 months of TE treatment.

Therapeutic strategies for patients with neuroendocrine neoplasms: current perspectives

INTRODUCTION

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are a heterogeneous group of malignancies mainly arising in the gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) and bronchopulmonary systems, with steadily increasing incidence. The therapeutic landscape has widened and the therapeutic strategy should be based on new sequences and combinations, still debated.

AREAS COVERED

Herein, we provide an overview of current approved pharmacological treatments in patients with NENs, with the aim to summarize evidence of efficacy of the main different options in GEP and pulmonary NENs, principally focusing on somatostatin analogs (SSAs), targeted therapy with everolimus and sunitinib, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) and chemotherapy. We discuss biological rationale and toxicities, including current indications according to differentiation and placement in the therapeutic algorithm, clinical trials, and combinations. Furthermore, we recommend areas for further research.

EXPERT OPINION

Therapeutic management of patients with NENs represents a challenge for clinicians and the identification of effective sequences and combinations is of utmost importance. Major efforts should be directed to early identify and overcome resistance and to limit toxicity. The progress in the therapeutic management of NENs grows faster and the choice of the best approach should be based on randomized clinical trials, as well as on long-term, real-world data.

Efficacy, safety and unmet needs of evolving medical treatments for carcinoid syndrome

This review reports on the currently available medical treatment options for the control of symptoms due to carcinoid syndrome in patients with neuroendocrine tumors. The efficacy and adverse events (AEs) of approved drugs such as somatostatin analogues (SSA), telotristat ethyl (TE) and interferon-alpha, are reviewed. Somatostatin analogues remain the standard treatment of carcinoid syndrome based on the high expression of somatostatin receptors and the resulting inhibition of secretion of bioactive compounds; their use is associated with relatively mild AEs, involving mainly the gastrointestinal system, and being usually transient. Although dose escalation of SSA remains an unapproved option, it is clinically implemented to alleviate symptoms in refractory carcinoid syndrome and supported by the most recent guidelines. The side effects associated with the increased dose are in general mild and consistent with standard dose of SSA. Telotristat ethyl, an oral inhibitor of tryptophan hydroxylase, the rate-limiting enzyme in serotonin biosynthesis, represents a rather novel innovative treatment option in patients with carcinoid syndrome suffering from diarrhea and complements the standard therapy of SSA. Given the low toxicity profile, TE may be considered an early add-on treatment to SSA in patients with uncontrolled carcinoid syndrome. However, further prolonged follow-up of patients treated with TE may be needed to exclude potential AEs, such as liver toxicity or depressed mood, in patients with long-term treatment. Interferon alpha is a cytokine with direct inhibitory effect on hormone secretion and tumor cell proliferation and an approved therapy in carcinoid syndrome but is associated with significant AEs in the majority of the patients requiring frequently dose reduction. The finding of a more favorable tolerability of pegylated interferon needs to be confirmed in a prospective study.

In patients with well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumours, there is no apparent benefit of somatostatin analogues after disease control by peptide receptor radionuclide therapy

PURPOSE

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) and somatostatin analogues (SSAs) are commonly combined as primary treatment for neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN), and SSAs given as maintenance. We sought to evaluate whether sequential therapy with PRRT followed by SSAs has progression or survival benefits in patients with NEN after disease control by PRRT.

METHODS

This prospective, randomised, single-centre study had as principal eligibility criteria: unresectable, locally advanced, or metastatic, histologically confirmed well-differentiated NEN; no symptoms/biochemical diagnosis of carcinoid syndrome; no SSAs or ≤ 3 months of SSAs before PRRT; and stable disease or partial or complete response after PRRT. Altogether, 115 patients were randomised 2:1 to an SSA group (n = 74) given octreotide acetate LAR every 4 weeks, or a control group (n = 41) receiving only best supportive care. Octreotide treatment was to stop upon intolerable toxicity or patient refusal, or, at physician/patient discretion, upon NEN progression. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), the secondary endpoint, and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Median (25th-75th percentile) follow-up from the first PRRT activity to death or latest observation was 6.6 (3.18-10.22) years. During that time, 71/115 patients (62%) progressed, 52/74 (70%) in the SSA group, and 19/41 (46%) in the control group (p = 0.01). Eighty-eight/115 patients (76%) died, 58/74 (78%) in the SSA group, and 30/41 (73%) in the control group (p = 0.52). Median (95% CI) PFS was 4.7 (2.8-7.7) years in the SSA group, and 6.4 (4.1-not reached) years in controls. Overall, median OS was 6.6 years. Neither PFS nor OS differed between groups (p = 0.129, p = 0.985, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with disease control after PRRT, subsequent SSA treatment appeared not to be associated with better PFS or OS. Whether to continue SSA administration upon progression after PRRT requires evaluation in a prospective, randomised, controlled multicentre study with a relatively homogeneous sample.

Comparing Somatostatin Analogs in the Treatment of Advanced Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

BACKGROUND

The 2 approved somatostatin analogs (SSAs) in the first-line treatment of advanced, well-differentiated gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) are octreotide long-acting release (Sandostatin LAR) and somatuline depot (Lanreotide). The study's objective was to compare progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of patients (pts) with GEP-NETs treated with somatuline or octreotide LAR. Pts and Methods: Pts with advanced well-differentiated GEP-NET who received either SSA at Emory University between 1995 and 2019 were included after institutional review board approval. The primary end point was PFS, defined as time to disease progression (according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1, or clinical progression) or death. The secondary end point was OS. Kaplan-Meier curves were generated, and log-rank tests were conducted to compare the survival outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 105 pts were identified. The mean age was 62.1 years (SD ± 11.8). The male-to-female ratio was 51:54. The majority (N = 69, 65.7%) were white. Most pts had grade 2 (G2) disease (N = 44, 41.9%). Primary location was small bowel in 58 (55.2%), pancreas in 27 (25.7%), and other in 20 (19.0%). Functional tumors were defined in 32 pts distributed equally between the 2 groups. Distribution of treatment was similar in the 2 groups, with 54 receiving octreotide LAR and 51 receiving somatuline depot. The median PFS for the octreotide LAR and somatuline depot groups was 12 months (95% CI, 6-18 months) and 10.8 months (95% CI, 6-15.6 months), respectively, and the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.2665). For pts with G1 disease, the median PFS for the octreotide LAR and somatuline depot was 8.4 versus 32.4 months, respectively, and the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.159). For G2 disease, the difference in median PFS between octreotide LAR and somutaline depot groups was statistically significant (12 vs. 7.2 months, respectively; p = 0.0372). The mean follow-up time for octreotide LAR was 21.6 months versus 11.3 months for somatuline depot.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, there was no difference in PFS between octreotide LAR and somatuline depot for pts with well-differentiated, metastatic GEP-NETs. A prospective study is worth designing selecting for G.

Prophylactic cholecystectomy is not mandatory in patients candidate to the resection for small intestine neuroendocrine neoplasms: a propensity score-matched and cost-minimization analysis

To evaluate two competitive strategies in patients undergoing resection of Small-intestine neuroendocrine neoplasms (Si-NEN): prophylactic cholecystectomy (PC) versus On-demand delayed (OC) cholecystectomy. None comparative studies are available. This is a retrospective study based on 247 Si-NENs candidates for the primary tumor resection. Patients were divided into two arms: PC and OC. Propensity score matching was performed, reporting the d value. The primary outcome was the rehospitalization rate for any cause. The secondary endpoints were: the rehospitalization rate for biliary stone disease (BSD), the mean number of rehospitalization (any cause and BSD), the complication rate (all and severe). A P value < 0.05 was considered significant, and the number needed to treat (NNT) < 10 was considered clinically relevant. Before matching, 52 (21.1%) were in the PC arm and 195 (78.9%) in the OC group. The two arms have a sub-optimal balance for age (d = 0.575), symptoms (d = 0.661), ENETS TNM stage (d = 0.661). After matching, we included 52 patients in PC and 104 in OC one. The two groups are well balanced (all d values < 0.5). The rehospitalization rate was similar in the two groups (36% vs 31; P = 0.594; NNT = 21). The rehospitalization rate for BSD was lower in the PC arm than OC one (0% vs 7%) without statistical significance (P = 0.096) and relevance (NNT = 15). The mean number of readmission (any cause and BSD) and the complication rate (all and severe) were similar. PC was not mandatory in patients having Si-NEN and candidates to the resection of primary tumors.

Time to Sustained Improvement in Bowel Movement Frequency with Telotristat Ethyl: Analyses of Phase III Studies in Carcinoid Syndrome

Background

Telotristat ethyl is approved to treat carcinoid syndrome diarrhea in combination with somatostatin analogs. In TELESTAR and TELECAST phase III studies, patients with carcinoid syndrome received telotristat ethyl 250 or 500 mg 3 times per day (tid) or placebo tid in addition to somatostatin analogs. The aim of this prespecified analysis was to examine the time to reductions in bowel movements (BMs) in the TELESTAR and TELECAST studies using survival analysis methods.

Methods

First occurrence of sustained response was defined as the time to the first day of 2 consecutive weeks with a mean BM frequency improvement of ≥ 30% from baseline during the 12-week double-blind treatment periods. Time to first ≥ 30% worsening in BM frequency was also measured. Treatments were compared with the log-rank test; Cox regression models provided point and confidence interval estimates of the hazard ratios for each trial.

Results

In TELESTAR and TELECAST, majority of patients (69%) on telotristat ethyl experienced a sustained ≥ 30% improvement in BM frequency. The median time to sustained reduction of at least 30% in BM frequency was significantly faster (fewer days to onset) for telotristat ethyl compared with placebo in both TELESTAR (250 mg, HR = 2.3 [95% CI, 1.3–4.1, P = 0.004]; 500 mg, HR = 2.2 [95% CI, 1.2–3.9, P = 0.009]) and TELECAST (250 mg, HR = 3.9 [95% CI, 1.6–11.1, P = 0.003]; 500 mg, HR = 4.2 [95% CI, 1.7–11.7, P = 0.002]). In TELECAST, 42% of patients on placebo experienced sustained worsening in BM frequency compared with 20% on telotristat ethyl; no significant difference was observed in TELESTAR.

Conclusion

The time of onset of sustained BM frequency improvement mean and range are important when considering use of telotristat ethyl in patients with carcinoid syndrome diarrhea. Telotristat ethyl may also reduce sustained worsening in BM frequency.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers: NCT01677910, NCT02063659

Antiproliferative Effect of Above-Label Doses of Somatostatin Analogs for the Management of Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

BACKGROUND

Above-label doses of somatostatin analogs (SSAs) are increasingly utilized in the management of inoperable/metastatic gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs), progressing on standard 4-weekly regimens.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the antiproliferative effect of 3-weekly SSA administration in a retrospective GEP-NET cohort.

METHODS

Patients with advanced GEP-NET, treated with long-acting release (LAR) octreotide 30 mg or lanreotide Autogel 120 mg at a 3-weekly interval, after disease progression on standard 4-weekly doses, were retrospectively identified. Clinicopathologic and treatment response data were collected. Progression-free survival (PFS; dose escalation to radiographic progression or death) was estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method. Factors associated with PFS were identified with the Cox proportional-hazards model.

RESULTS

The inclusion criteria were fulfilled by 105 patients. Octreotide LAR was administered to 60 (57%) and lanreotide Autogel to 45 (43%). Indications for dose escalation were breakthrough carcinoid symptoms (58%), radiographic progression (35%) and/or increasing biomarkers (11%). Diarrheal and/or flushing symptomatic improvement was identified in 37/67 cases (55%) and 30/55 cases (55%) with available data, respectively. The disease control rate (radiographic partial response or stable disease) was achieved in 53 patients (50%). Median PFS was 25.0 months (95% CI 16.9-33.1). Patients with radiographic progression <12 months from 4-weekly SSA initiation had worse PFS after dose escalation (7.0 vs. 17.0 months, p = 0.002). In multivariate analysis, pancreatic NETs, a Ki-67 index ≥5% and multiple extrahepatic metastases were independently associated with inferior PFS.

CONCLUSIONS

Above-label doses of SSAs may offer a considerable prolongation of PFS and could be utilized as a bridge to other more toxic treatments. Patients with small bowel/colorectal primaries, a Ki-67 index <5% and absence of/limited extrahepatic metastases are more likely to benefit from this approach.

Differential diagnosis of diarrhoea in patients with neuroendocrine tumours: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Approximately 20% of patients with neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) develop carcinoid syndrome (CS), characterised by flushing and diarrhoea. Somatostatin analogues or telotristat can be used to control symptoms of CS through inhibition of serotonin secretion. Although CS is often the cause of diarrhoea among patients with gastroenteropancreatic NETs (GEP-NETs), other causes to consider include pancreatic enzyme insufficiency (PEI), bile acid malabsorption and small intestinal bacterial overgrowth. If other causes of diarrhoea unrelated to serotonin secretion are mistaken for CS diarrhoea, these treatments may be ineffective against the diarrhoea, risking detrimental effects to patient quality of life.

AIM

To identify and synthesise qualitative and quantitative evidence relating to the differential diagnosis of diarrhoea in patients with GEP-NETs.

METHODS

Electronic databases (MEDLINE, Embase and the Cochrane Library) were searched from inception to September 12, 2018 using terms for NETs and diarrhoea. Congresses, systematic literature review bibliographies and included articles were also hand-searched. Any study designs and publication types were eligible for inclusion if relevant data on a cause(s) of diarrhoea in patients with GEP-NETs were reported. Studies were screened by two independent reviewers at abstract and full-text stages. Framework synthesis was adapted to synthesise quantitative and qualitative data. The definition of qualitative data was expanded to include all textual data in any section of relevant publications.

RESULTS

Forty-seven publications (44 studies) were included, comprising a variety of publication types, including observational studies, reviews, guidelines, case reports, interventional studies, and opinion pieces. Most reported on PEI on/after treatment with somatostatin analogs; 9.5%-84% of patients with GEP-NETs had experienced steatorrhoea or confirmed PEI. Where reported, 14.3%–50.7% of patients received pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy. Other causes of diarrhoea reported in patients with GEP-NETs included bile acid malabsorption (80%), small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (23.6%-62%), colitis (20%) and infection (7.1%). Diagnostic approaches included faecal elastase, breath tests, tauroselcholic (selenium-75) acid (SeHCAT) scan and stool culture, although evidence on the effectiveness or diagnostic accuracy of these approaches was limited. Assessment of patient history or diarrhoea characteristics was also reported as initial approaches for investigation. From the identified evidence, if diarrhoea is assumed to be CS diarrhoea, consequences include uncontrolled diarrhoea, malnutrition, and perceived ineffectiveness of CS treatment. Approaches for facilitating differential diagnosis of diarrhoea include improving patient and clinician awareness of non-CS causes and involvement of a multidisciplinary clinical team, including gastroenterologists.

CONCLUSION

Diarrhoea in GEP-NETs can be multifactorial with misdiagnosis leading to delayed patient recovery and inefficient resource use. This systematic literature review highlights gaps for further research on prevalence of non-CS diarrhoea and suitability of diagnostic approaches, to determine an effective algorithm for differential diagnosis of GEP-NET diarrhoea.

A Budget Impact Model of the Addition of Telotristat Ethyl Treatment to the Standard of Care in Patients with Uncontrolled Carcinoid Syndrome

BACKGROUND

Carcinoid syndrome, a rare condition in patients with neuroendocrine tumours, characterised by flushing and diarrhoea, severely affects patients' quality of life. The current carcinoid syndrome standard of care includes somatostatin analogues, but some patients experience uncontrolled symptoms despite somatostatin analogue therapy. Telotristat ethyl is a novel treatment approved by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and US FDA that significantly reduces bowel movement frequency in patients with uncontrolled carcinoid syndrome.

OBJECTIVE

We developed a model to evaluate the 5-year budget impact of introducing telotristat ethyl to standard care in Swedish patients with uncontrolled carcinoid syndrome.

METHODS

Treatment response in the 12-week phase III TELESTAR trial (NCT01677910) informed telotristat ethyl efficacy; subsequently, health states were captured by a Markov model using 4-week cycles. TELESTAR open-label extension data informed telotristat ethyl discontinuation. The number of treatment-eligible patients was estimated from literature reviews reporting the prevalence, incidence and mortality of carcinoid syndrome. A Swedish database study informed real-world costs related to carcinoid syndrome and carcinoid heart disease costs. Telotristat ethyl market share was assumed to increase annually from 24% (year 1) to 70% (year 5).

RESULTS

Over the 5-year model horizon, 44 patients were expected to initiate telotristat ethyl treatment. The cumulative net budget impact of adding telotristat ethyl to current standard of care was €172,346; per-year costs decreased from €66,495 (year 1) to €29,818 (year 5). Increased drug costs from adding telotristat ethyl were offset by reduced costs elsewhere.

CONCLUSIONS

The expected budget impact of adding telotristat ethyl to the standard of care in Sweden was relatively low, largely because of the rarity of carcinoid syndrome.

TELEPRO: Patient-Reported Carcinoid Syndrome Symptom Improvement Following Initiation of Telotristat Ethyl in the Real World

BACKGROUND

When carcinoid syndrome (CS) diarrhea (CSD) is inadequately controlled with long-acting somatostatin analogs (SSAs), clinical practice guidelines recommend addition of the tryptophan hydroxylase inhibitor telotristat ethyl (TE). In a 12-week multinational, randomized controlled trial, TE added to SSA reduced peripheral serotonin and the frequency of CSD. We evaluated real-world effectiveness of TE using patient-reported data from a nurse support program over 3 months.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study used a deidentified data set of patients initiating TE who opted into a nurse support program between March and November 2017 and reported CS symptom burden at baseline and at least one follow-up time point at months 1, 2, and 3. Patients reported demographic and medical history information as well as frequency of bowel movements (BMs) and flushing episodes, severity of nausea, urgency and abdominal pain (0 "no/not at all" to 100 "worst imaginable/very urgent"), and stool form (1 "very hard" to 10 "watery"). Mean changes from baseline in CS symptom burden were reported using paired-sample t tests and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests.

RESULTS

Most patients initiating TE enrolled in the nurse program (791/898, 88%), of whom 369 (47%) were included in the analysis. Patients treated with TE reported significant reductions in CSD and other CS symptoms (all p < .001). At least half of patients treated with TE experienced ≥30% improvement from baseline in BM frequency and an average reduction of at least two BMs per day within 3 months.

CONCLUSION

Patients taking SSA therapy showed substantial burden of disease before initiating TE and significant improvements with the addition of TE treatment in this real-world effectiveness study.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Patients with carcinoid syndrome diarrhea uncontrolled by high doses of long-acting somatostatin analogs may be candidates for additional therapy with the tryptophan hydroxylase inhibitor telotristat ethyl. Understanding the real-world prevalence of uncontrolled symptoms and the effectiveness of telotristat ethyl in clinical practice may further support clinical and policy decisions for these patients. This study investigated self-reported carcinoid syndrome symptom burden and improvements among patients initiating telotristat ethyl and participating in a voluntary nurse support program. Disease burden and off-label somatostatin analog treatment before initiating telotristat ethyl were high, and symptoms improved markedly over 1, 2, and 3 months of treatment.

Evidence-Based Policy in Practice: Management of Carcinoid Syndrome Diarrhea

Carcinoid syndrome causes substantial morbidity and reduces quality of life and survival. In a recent clinical trial, 97% of patients reported bowel movement-related issues, abdominal pain, flushing, and low energy. Combining somatostatin analogs with elotristat ethyl provides a new option for managing refractory CS symptoms. Health care providers should consider strategies that take advantage of approved dosing for patients with CS-related diarrhea.

Relationship Between Symptoms and Health-related Quality-of-life Benefits in Patients With Carcinoid Syndrome: Post Hoc Analyses From TELESTAR

PURPOSE

Patients with metastatic neuroendocrine tumors and carcinoid syndrome (CS) may experience chronic, recurring symptoms despite somatostatin analogue therapy. Little is known about the relationship between bowel movement (BM) frequency, patient-reported symptoms and health-related quality of life (QoL). Data from the TELESTAR study were used in exploratory, post hoc analyses to understand the relationship between durable reductions in BM frequency, symptom relief, and health-related QoL.

METHODS

Patients with metastatic neuroendocrine tumors and CS in the Phase III TELESTAR study were randomized (1:1:1) to receive telotristat ethyl (TE) 250 mg, TE 500 mg, or placebo three times daily (TID) during a 12-week double-blind treatment period (DBTP). All patients received TE 500 mg TID in an open-label extension (OLE) to Week 48. Durable response was predefined. Analyses compared durable responders (DRs) and non-durable responders (NDRs), irrespective of treatment group, at Weeks 12, 24, and 48.

FINDINGS

At the start of the DBTP, 135 patients were randomized, 45 patients each to TE 250 mg, TE 500 mg, and placebo. After the 12-week DBTP, 48 of 135 patients were DRs (TE 250 mg, n = 20; TE 500 mg, n = 19; placebo, n = 9). Of the 115 patients who entered the OLE, 35 were DRs initially randomized to TE 250 mg (n = 18) or 500 mg (n = 17), 29 of whom maintained a durable response throughout the OLE. Of the 71 DBTP-NDRs (inclusive of patients initially randomized to placebo), 28 became OLE-DRs. There were 29 NDRs initially randomized to placebo who entered the OLE, 16 of whom became DRs when switched to TE 500 mg. DRs during the DBTP had greater symptom improvements in the DBTP; these improvements continued over the OLE. DBTP-DRs also maintained more meaningful QoL improvements in EORTC QLQ-C30 global health status, nausea and vomiting, pain, diarrhea, and EORTC QLQ-GINET21 gastrointestinal symptoms over the DBTP and OLE periods than DBTP-NDRs.

IMPLICATIONS

These results suggest that sustained improvements in BM frequency in patients with CS may have multifaceted, long-term effects on a patient's well-being. ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT01677910.

Prognostic and predictive biomarkers for somatostatin analogs, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy and serotonin pathway targets in neuroendocrine tumours

Neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) are a heterogeneous group of neoplasms regarding their molecular biology, clinical behaviour, prognosis and response to therapy. Several attempts to establish robust predictive biomarkers have failed. Neither tissue markers nor blood borne ones have proven to be successful yet. Circulating tumour cells (CTCs) as "liquid biopsies" could provide prognostic information at the time a therapeutic decision needs to be made and could be an attractive tool for tumour monitoring throughout the treatment period. However, "liquid biopsies" are far from becoming the standard biomarker in NETs. Promising results have been presented over the last few years using a novel biomarker candidate, a multianalyte algorithm analysis PCR-based test (NETest). New technologies will open the field to different ways of approaching the biomarker conundrum in NETs. However, the complications derived from being a heterogeneous group of malignancies will remain with us forever. In summary, there is an unmet need to incorporate new biomarker candidates into clinical research trials to obtain a robust prospective validation under the most demanding scenario.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of telotristat ethyl for treatment of carcinoid syndrome diarrhea inadequately controlled with somatostatin analogs

AIMS

This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of telotristat ethyl (TE) added to somatostatin analog octreotide (SSA + TE) compared to octreotide alone (SSA) in patients with carcinoid syndrome diarrhea (CSD) whose symptoms remain uncontrolled with SSA alone.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A deterministic Markov model evaluated the costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALY) gained with SSA + TE vs SSA per a third-party US payer perspective. The model reflected clinical practice and resource use estimates based on current standards of care, with utility estimates based on similar symptoms from ulcerative colitis. Treatment efficacy was based on the phase III clinical trial of SSA + TE vs SSA alone [TELESTAR, NCT01677910]. According to TELESTAR, 44% of SSA + TE and 20% of SSA patients responded to therapy after 12 weeks. At each 4-week assessment period, SSA patients not adequately controlled received increasing doses of SSA and SSA + TE patients discontinued TE and moved to SSA only. Drug costs for adequately and not adequately controlled patients were $4,291.75 and $5,890.57 for SSA, respectively, and $9,456.07 and $5,890.57 for SSA + TE, respectively.

RESULTS

The base-case analysis demonstrated lifetime QALYs of 1.67 at a cost of $495,125 for the SSA cohort and 2.33 ($590,087) for SSA + TE with an incremental QALY for SSA + TE of 0.66 for an additional $94,962. The incremental cost per QALY gained was $142,545. Sensitivity analyses demonstrated high probability (>99%) of SSA + TE being cost-effective at thresholds for rare diseases and orphan drugs of $300,000-$450,000.

LIMITATIONS

The recent availability of TE precluded the incorporation of clinical and economic inputs based on real-world practice patterns. The scarcity of epidemiology and utility information for this rare condition required the use of some proxy estimates.

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis demonstrated TE is a cost-effective treatment option when used on top of standard of care in CSD patients.

Carcinoid-syndrome: recent advances, current status and controversies

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To review recent advances and controversies in all aspects of carcinoid-syndrome.

RECENT FINDINGS

Over the last few years there have been a number of advances in all aspects of carcinoid syndrome as well as new therapies. These include new studies on its epidemiology which demonstrate it is increasing in frequency; increasing insights into the pathogenesis of its various clinical manifestations and into its natural history: definition of prognostic factors; new methods to verify its presence; the development of new drugs to treat its various manifestations, both initially and in somatostatin-refractory cases; and an increased understanding of the pathogenesis, natural history and management of carcinoid heart disease. These advances have generated several controversies and these are also reviewed.

SUMMARY

There have been numerous advances in all aspects of the carcinoid-syndrome, which is the most common functional syndrome neuroendocrine tumors produce. These advances are leading to new approaches to the management of these patients and in some cases to new controversies.

Telotristat ethyl: a novel agent for the therapy of carcinoid syndrome diarrhea

Carcinoid syndrome (CS), characterized by diarrhea and flushing, is present in 20% of patients with neuroendocrine tumors at diagnosis and becomes more frequent with progression. The diarrhea of CS is caused mainly by tumoral secretion of serotonin. It may not be fully controlled by somatostatin analogs, the currently indicated drugs for symptomatic relief. Telotristat ethyl is a novel inhibitor of tryptophan hydroxylase, the rate-limiting enzyme in serotonin biosynthesis. Administration of the drug decreases diarrhea in patients with CS. Telotristat ethyl was approved in February 2017 (USA) and September 2017 (European Commission) for the treatment of CS diarrhea in adults inadequately controlled by somatostatin analog alone. This drug is expected to greatly improve the health and quality of life of patients with CS diarrhea.

Octreotide long-acting repeatable in the treatment of neuroendocrine tumors: patient selection and perspectives

Over the past three decades, the incidence and prevalence of neuroendocrine tumors have gradually increased. Due to the slow-growing nature of these tumors, most cases are diagnosed at advanced stages. Prognosis and survival are associated with location of primary lesion, biochemical functional status, differentiation, initial staging, and response to therapy. Octreotide, the first synthetic somatostatin analog, was initially used for the management of gastrointestinal symptoms associated with functional carcinoid tumors. Its commercial development over time led to long-acting repeatable octreotide acetate, a long-acting version that provided greater administration convenience. Recent research demonstrates that octreotide’s efficacy has evolved beyond symptomatic management to targeted therapy with antitumoral effects. This review examines the history and development of octreotide, provides a synopsis on the classification, grading, and staging of neuroendocrine tumors, and reviews the evidence of long-acting repeatable octreotide acetate as monotherapy and in combination with other treatment modalities in the management of non-pituitary neuroendocrine tumors with special attention to recent high-quality Phase III trials.

Budgetary Impact of Telotristat Ethyl, a Novel Treatment for Patients with Carcinoid Syndrome Diarrhea: A US Health Plan Perspective

PURPOSE

Telotristat ethyl (TE) was recently approved for carcinoid syndrome diarrhea (CSD) in patients not adequately controlled with somatostatin analog long-acting release (SSA LAR) therapy alone. A budget impact model was developed to determine the short-term affordability of reimbursing TE in a US health plan.

METHODS

A budget impact model compared health care costs when CSD is managed per current treatment patterns (SSA LAR, reference drug scenario) versus when TE is incorporated in the treatment algorithm (SSA LAR + TE, new drug scenario). Prevalence of CSD, proportion of patients not adequately controlled on SSA LAR, monthly treatment costs (pharmacy and medical), and treatment efficacy were derived from the literature. In the reference drug scenario, an escalated monthly dose of SSA LAR therapy of 40 mg was assumed to treat patients with CSD not adequately controlled on the labeled dose of SSA LAR. In the new drug scenario, TE was added to the maximum labeled monthly dose of SSA LAR therapy of 30 mg. The incremental budget impact was calculated based on an assumed TE market uptake of 28%, 42%, and 55% during Years 1, 2, and 3, respectively. One-way sensitivity analyses were conducted to test model assumptions.

FINDINGS

A hypothetical health plan of 1 million members was estimated to have 42 prevalent CSD patients of whom 17 would be inadequately controlled on SSA LAR therapy. The monthly medical cost per patient not adequately controlled on SSA LAR in addition to pharmacotherapy was estimated to be $3946 based on the literature. Based on the observed treatment response in a clinical trial of 20% and 44% for the base case reference and new drug scenarios, total per patient per month costs were estimated to be $7563 and $11,205, respectively. Total annual costs in the new drug scenario were estimated to be $2.3 to $2.5 million during the first 3 years. The overall incremental annual costs were estimated to be $154,000 in Year 1, $231,000 in Year 2, and $302,000 in Year 3. This translated to an incremental per patient per month cost of $0.013, $0.019, and $0.025 for Years 1, 2, and 3. These results remained robust in 1-way sensitivity analyses.

IMPLICATIONS

The availability of TE for patients not adequately controlled on SSA LAR therapy provides a novel treatment option for CSD. This model showed that providing access to this first-in-class oral agent would have a minimal budget impact to a US health plan.

Optimizing Somatostatin Analog Use in Well or Moderately Differentiated Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

BACKGROUND

Somatostatin analogues, aiming to control tumor secretion or growth, constitute the most attractive therapeutic option for patients with well-differentiated gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs). The objective of this article is to provide a comprehensive review of the current state-of-the-art knowledge gaps and potential opportunities for future development and optimization of this therapeutic modality.

METHOD

A contextualized systematic review with a narrative component was conducted using PubMed, The Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and Google Scholar. Titles were screened, and non-English, duplicate, or irrelevant entries were excluded. Selection criteria for articles included the following: publication in English between 1995 and 2016, patients with GEP-NETs, analysis of efficacy, safety, practical management considerations, predictive factors, and/or strategies for overcoming resistance, concerning somatostatin analogs.

RESULTS

Ninety-seven studies out of 2771 screened publications met the inclusion criteria (16 randomized clinical trials, 27 phase II trials, 3 phase I trials, 3 subgroup analyses of clinical trials, 1 open-label extension of a randomized trial, 1 phase IV trial, 32 observational studies, and 14 basic research articles). The nature and scope of literature was diverse with most articles dedicated to drug efficacy or indications of use (n = 49), pharmacological issues (n = 8), assessment or predictors of response (n = 4), practical management (n = 11), combination therapy or other means to overcome resistance (n = 19), receptors and signaling pathways (n = 3), and subgroup analyses (n = 3).

CONCLUSION

In this appraisal, we have found some practical aspects that can help to the optimization of somatostatin analog (SSA) therapy in patients with well-differentiated GEP-NETs. We have also identified areas of uncertainty in an effort to guide clinical research in the coming years.

Treatment Strategies for Metastatic Neuroendocrine Tumors of the Gastrointestinal Tract

OPINION STATEMENT

The therapeutic landscape of gastroenteropancreatic-neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) has evolved significantly in recent years. Current and emerging treatment options include somatostatin analogs, radiolabeled somatostatin analogs, the mTOR inhibitor everolimus, and the tyrosine kinase inhibitor sunitinib. Although high-quality data from phase III trials are lacking, cytotoxic agents are commonly used for the treatment of poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas and well-differentiated NETs originating in the pancreas. Hepatic-directed therapies are recommended for patients with slow-growing, liver-predominant disease but have never been compared to systemic agents. Telotristat ethyl, a novel serotonin synthesis inhibitor, has recently demonstrated efficacy in palliating diarrhea in patients with poorly controlled carcinoid syndrome. In the absence of definite predictive biomarkers, therapeutic decisions in most cases rely on clinical and pathological criteria. However, navigating the current therapeutic algorithm may be challenging, and future trials need to address several important questions: what is the best sequence of treatment? Is there a role for combination therapies in GEP-NETs? Are neoadjuvant, adjuvant, or maintenance strategies safe and effective? Do all NET patients require active treatment? What new molecular targets can be clinically exploited? A tight integration between basic and clinical research is needed to further advance the field of NETs.

Unravelling the pharmacologic opportunities and future directions for targeted therapies in gastro-intestinal cancers part 2: Neuroendocrine tumours, hepatocellular carcinoma, and gastro-intestinal stromal tumours

Until the 1990s, cytotoxic chemotherapy has been the cornerstone of medical therapy for gastrointestinal (GI) cancers. Better understanding of the cancer cell molecular biology has led to the therapeutic revolution of targeted therapies, i.e. monoclonal antibodies or small molecule inhibitors directed against proteins that are specifically overexpressed or mutated in cancer cells. These agents, being more specific to cancer cells, were expected to be less toxic than conventional cytotoxic agents. However, their effects have sometimes been disappointing, due to intrinsic or acquired resistance mechanisms, or to an activity restricted to some tumour settings, illustrating the importance of patient selection and early identification of predictive biomarkers of response to these therapies. Targeted agents have provided clinical benefit in many GI cancer types. Particularly, some GI tumours are considered chemoresistant and targeted therapies have offered a new therapeutic base for their management. Hence, somatostatin receptor-directed strategies, sorafenib, and imatinib have revolutioned the management of neuroendocrine tumours (NET), hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST), respectively, and are now used as first-line treatment in many patients affected by these tumours. However, these agents face problems of resistances and identification of predictive biomarkers from imaging and/or biology. We propose a comprehensive two-part review providing a panoramic approach of the successes and failures of targeted agents in GI cancers to unravel the pharmacologic opportunities and future directions for these agents in GI oncology. In this second part, we will focus on NET, HCC, and GIST, whose treatment relies primarily on targeted therapies.

The North American Neuroendocrine Tumor Society Consensus Guidelines for Surveillance and Medical Management of Midgut Neuroendocrine Tumors

There have been significant developments in diagnostic and therapeutic options for patients with neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). Key phase 3 studies include the CLARINET trial, which evaluated lanreotide in patients with nonfunctioning enteropancreatic NETs; the RADIANT-2 and RADIANT-4 studies, which evaluated everolimus in functioning and nonfunctioning NETs of the gastrointestinal tract and lungs; the TELESTAR study, which evaluated telotristat ethyl in patients with refractory carcinoid syndrome; and the NETTER-1 trial, which evaluated Lu-DOTATATE in NETs of the small intestine and proximal colon (midgut). Based on these and other advances, the North American Neuroendocrine Tumor Society convened a multidisciplinary panel of experts with the goal of updating consensus-based guidelines for evaluation and treatment of midgut NETs. The medical aspects of these guidelines (focusing on systemic treatment, nonsurgical liver-directed therapy, and postoperative surveillance) are summarized in this article. Surgical guidelines are described in a companion article.

Predictive factors of antiproliferative activity of octreotide LAR as first-line therapy for advanced neuroendocrine tumours

BACKGROUND

The antiproliferative activity of octreotide LAR in neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) has been demonstrated by small retrospective studies and confirmed by a prospective phase III trial (PROMID). However, there are limited data about the duration and predictors of response. The aim of our retrospective study was to determine the time to radiological progression (TTRP) of disease and the factors that were associated with better response.

METHODS

A total of 254 treatment naïve patients with advanced NETs and positive somatostatin receptor scintigraphy were included. Mean follow-up period was 42 months.

RESULTS

The location of primary was in the small bowel in 204, pancreas in 22, lungs in 14, rectum in 7 and unknown in 7 patients. Most tumours were well-differentiated, G1 (58%) and G2 (23%). The majority of patients commenced octreotide LAR due to functional symptoms (57%), radiological progression (10%) or in the presence of asymptomatic and stable disease on the basis of data from the PROMID trial (18.5%). Partial response occurred in 5%. For all patients, the median TTRP was 37 months (95% confidence interval, CI: 32-52 months). There was a statistically significant shorter TTRP in patients with pancreatic tumours, liver metastases and intermediate grade tumours. Extremely raised (>10 times the upper limit of normal) baseline chromogranin A levels were associated with an unfavourable outcome. In contrast, male sex, carcinoid heart disease and initiation of treatment in the presence of stable disease were predictive of a better response. Age, extra-hepatic metastases, presence of mesenteric desmoplasia, previous resection and functional status of the primary tumour did not affect response.

CONCLUSIONS

The duration of the antiproliferative effect of octreotide LAR seems to be longer than previously reported. This study has identified several predictors of response in a large cohort of patients with NETs on somatostatin analogue therapy.

Somatostatin analogues in functioning gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours: literature review, clinical recommendations and schedules

OBJECTIVE

Neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) represent a heterogeneous group of neoplasms, which include functioning and non-functioning forms. Somatostatin analogues (SSAs) play a key role in the management of these tumours. Herein, we aimed at reviewing the current evidence about the role of SSAs in the treatment of gastro-entero-pancreatic (GEP)-NETs.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

An extensive bibliographical search was performed in PubMed using the following keywords: gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours, somatostatin analogues, octreotide, lanreotide, in order to identify all the pertinent English-written articles published between 1990 and 2015.

RESULTS

SSAs have shown to help the symptomatic and biochemical improvement of patients with NETs and to exhibit a good safety profile. Recent studies have also reported a role for SSAs in tumour growth control, although the results are less impressive and the underlying mechanisms are not fully understood.

CONCLUSIONS

SSAs are well known as a symptomatic and, to lesser extent, anti-proliferative treatment in GEP-NETs. However, some issues, including optimal dosage, benefits and adverse events of combination with other molecules, and the role of new analogues, remain to be elucidated in further randomised studies.

Systemic Therapies for Advanced Gastrointestinal Carcinoid Tumors

Well-differentiated gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors (GINETs) tend to be slow growing, but treatment of advanced disease remains a challenge. Somatostatin analogues (SSAs) are considered standard therapy for carcinoid syndrome. SSAs delay tumor progression in advanced well-differentiated gastroenteropancreatic NETs. Cytotoxic chemotherapy and interferon play a limited role in the treatment of nonpancreatic GINETs. There is no standard approach to treatment of patients with disease progression. Identification of systemic agents with antitumor activity in advanced disease remains an unmet medical need. Enrollment to clinical trials is encouraged; potential therapeutic targets include the vascular endothelial growth factor and mammalian target of rapamycin signaling pathways.

Neuroendocrine tumours - Medical therapy: Biological

Somatostatin analogues (SSA) are well established antisecretory drugs that have been used as first line treatment for symptomatic control in hormonally active neuroendocrine tumours (NET) for three decades. Both available depot formulations of SSA, long-acting repeatable (LAR) octreotide and lanreotide autogel, seem similarly effective and well tolerated, although comparative trials in NET have not been performed. The importance of SSA as antiproliferative treatment has been increasingly recognized during recent years. Two placebo-controlled trials demonstrated significant prolongation of progression free survival under SSA treatment. However, objective response as assessed by imaging is rare. Interferon-α (IFNα) also has antisecretory and antiproliferative efficacy in NET. Due to the less favourable toxicity profile it mainly has a role as add-on option in the refractory setting, especially in carcinoid syndrome patients. Further studies are needed to evaluate the antiproliferative efficacy of the multiligand SSA pasireotide and the role of pegylated IFNα.

Catheter-based treatments for hepatic metastases from neuroendocrine tumors

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this article is to present our experience in treating patients with hepatic metastases from a neuroendocrine primary malignancy.

CONCLUSION

The tumor and patient characteristics, vascular access, and features of treatment all play a role in the long-term management of patients with metatastic neuroendocrine tumors. Routine prophylactic measures are recommended to reduce the frequency and severity of crisis events related to hormone release in patients with neuroendocrine tumors.

Impact of long-acting octreotide in patients with early-stage MEN1-related duodeno-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours

BACKGROUND

Somatostatin analogues (SSA) represent one of the main therapeutic option in patients affected with functioning well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumours (NETs). There are no studies specifically focusing on NETs associated with Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia type 1 (MEN1).

AIM

To evaluate the efficacy of the long-acting SSA octreotide in MEN1 patients with early-stage duodeno-pancreatic NETs.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Forty patients with MEN1 were retrospectively evaluated. Twenty patients with evidence of one or more MEN1-related duodeno-pancreatic NETs < 20 mm in size (age range 26-61 years) were treated with octreotide long-acting octreotide (LAR) as first-line therapy. Treatment duration ranged 12-75 months. At the baseline radiological evaluation, multiple duodeno-pancreatic NETs (range 1-8, size 3-18 mm) were detected.

RESULTS

An objective tumour response was observed in 10%, stable disease in 80% and progression of disease in 10% of cases. In six patients with abnormally increased CgA, gastrin and/or insulin serum concentrations, a significant clinical and hormonal response occurred in 100% of cases and was stable along the time.

CONCLUSIONS

Therapy with SSA is highly safe and effective in patients with early-stage MEN1 duodeno-pancreatic NETs, resulting in long-time suppression of tumour and hormonal activity and 10% objective response. This suggests to early start therapy with SSA in patients with MEN1-related NETs.

Evaluation of the WHO 2010 grading and AJCC/UICC staging systems in prognostic behavior of intestinal neuroendocrine tumors

Background

The increasing incidence and heterogeneous behavior of intestinal neuroendocrine tumors (iNETs) pose a clinicopathological challenge. Our goal was to decribe the prognostic value of the new WHO 2010 grading and the AJCC/UICC TNM staging systems for iNETs. Moreover, outcomes of patients treated with somatostatin analogs were assessed.

Methods

We collected epidemiological and clinicopathological data from 93 patients with histologically proven iNETs including progression and survival outcomes. The WHO 2010 grading and the AJCC/UICC TNM staging systems were applied for all cases. RECIST criteria were used to define progression. Kaplan-Meier analyses for progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were performed.

Results

Mean follow-up was 58.6 months (4–213 months). WHO 2010 grading yielded PFS and disease-specific OS of 125.0 and 165.8 months for grade 1 (G1), 100.0 and 144.2 months for G2 and 15.0 and 15.8 months for G3 tumors (p = 0.004 and p = 0.001). Using AJCC staging, patients with stage I and II tumors had no progression and no deaths. Stage III and IV patients demonstrated PFS of 138.4 and 84.7 months (p = 0.003) and disease-specific OS of 210.0 and 112.8 months (p = 0.017). AJCC staging also provided informative PFS (91.2 vs. 50.0 months, p = 0.004) and OS (112.3 vs. 80.0 months, p = 0.005) measures with somatostatin analog use in stage IV patients.

Conclusion

Our findings underscore the complementarity of WHO 2010 and AJCC classifications in providing better estimates of iNETS disease outcomes and extend the evidence for somatostatin analog benefit in patients with metastatic disease.

Update on the role of somatostatin analogs for the treatment of patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

Somatostatin analogs (SA) are the standard of care for controlling symptoms of patients with functional gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs). SA control symptoms in more than 70% of patients with carcinoid syndrome. Similar results are obtained in patients with functional, hormone-secreting, pancreatic NETs. The use of SA as antiproliferative agents has been established only recently. Retrospective studies have shown stabilization of tumor growth in >50% of patients with progressive disease. The results of a recent randomized phase III trial (PROMID) demonstrated that the median time to progression in patients with midgut carcinoid tumors treated with octreotide LAR (Long-Acting-Repeatable, Novartis, Basel, Switzerland) was more than twice as long compared to that of patients treated with placebo. The results of a phase III study of lanreotide versus placebo in nonfunctional NETs are not yet available. More studies are needed to determine whether combining SA with novel targeted treatments will result in enhanced antiproliferative activity compared to treatment with a SA alone. Studies are ongoing using pan-receptor agonists (eg, pasireotide) and chimeric dimers, which possess features of somatostatin and dopamine agonists (dopastatins) and are thought to enhance symptom control by binding multiple receptors (somatostatin and dopamine receptors). Somatostatin receptor antagonists are also currently being developed for clinical use. Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT), consisting of yttrium-90 and lutetium-177 isotopes conjugated with SA appear to be efficacious in advanced NETs. Randomized studies are needed to definitively establish the safety and efficacy of this strategy compared to other available treatments, and to determine which radiolabeled isotopes or combinations are most effective.

Neuroendocrine tumor disease: an evolving landscape

Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs) represent a heterogenous group of tumors arising from a variety of neuroendocrine cell types. The incidence and prevalence of GEP-NENs have markedly increased over the last three decades. Symptoms are often absent in early disease, or vague and nonspecific even in advanced disease. Delayed diagnosis is thus common. Chromogranin A is the most commonly used biomarker but has limitations as does the proliferative marker Ki-67%, which is often used for tumor grading and determination of therapy. The development of a multidimensional prognostic nomogram may be valuable in predicting tumor behavior and guiding therapy but requires validation. Identification of NENs that express somatostatin receptors (SSTR) allows for SSTR scintigraphy and positron emission tomography imaging using novel radiolabeled compounds. Complete surgical resection of limited disease or endoscopic ablation of small lesions localized in stomach or rectum can provide cure; however, the majority of GEP-NENs are metastatic (most frequently the liver and/or mesenteric lymph nodes) at diagnosis. Selected patients with metastatic disease may benefit from advanced surgical techniques including hepatic resection or liver transplantation. Somatostatin analogs are effective for symptomatic treatment and exhibit some degree of antiproliferative activity in small intestinal NENs. There is a place for streptozotocin, temozolomide, and capecitabine in the management of pancreatic NENs, while new agents targeting either mTOR (everolimus) or angiogenic (sunitinib) pathways have shown efficacy in these lesions.

Therapeutic management of patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours

Patients with neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) are best managed in a specialist centre as part of a multidisciplinary team comprising gastroenterologists, oncologists, endocrinologists, gastrointestinal and hepatopancreaticobiliary surgeons, pathologists, nuclear medicine physicians and technicians, radiologists, specialist nurses, pharmacists, biochemists and dieticians. This should ideally be led by a clinician with experience and interest in NETs. Although the number of medical treatments and clinical trials has increased in the decade, there is still a lack of prospective randomised trials; thus, management is mainly based on limited often single-centre studies, although there are now formal guidelines based on consensus expert opinion. We have outlined the current optimal management of patients with NETs. We have reviewed therapeutic options including surgery, somatostatin analogues and other biotherapies and peptide receptor-targeted therapy. We have discussed the challenge in managing hepatic metastases including hepatic artery embolisation, ablation and orthotopic liver transplant. In addition, we have briefly reviewed the emerging therapies such as the mammalian target of rapamycin and angiogenic inhibitors and the newer somatostatin analogues.

Long-term results of treatment of malignant carcinoid syndrome with prolonged release Lanreotide (Somatuline Autogel)

BACKGROUND

Somatostatin analogues are the mainstay of therapy for malignant carcinoid syndrome. There is clear evidence that the once monthly intramuscular formulation, Octreotide LAR, controls symptoms of carcinoid syndrome, and recent data also suggests an antitumour effect. There is limited data on prolonged release Lanreotide (Somatuline Autogel, Ipsen Pharma Biotech, Signes, France) and no long-term data to date.

AIM

To present long-term results of prolonged release Lanreotide in a large cohort of patients with malignant carcinoid syndrome, assessing clinical and objective response and tolerance.

METHODS

Seventy six patients with metastatic midgut neuroendocrine tumours and carcinoid syndrome were included in this 9-year retrospective study. Clinical response was based on symptom score with radiological assessment based on RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumours).

RESULTS

Data were available in 69 patients. Ninety four percent achieved symptomatic response at first follow-up visit. Forty six percent had loss of symptomatic response, but 44% of these achieved control with an increase in dose of prolonged release Lanreotide. Overall, symptoms were well controlled throughout the study period with prolonged release Lanreotide alone in 74% of patients. Twenty six percent required additional treatment despite good initial response. Only 30% demonstrated radiological progression. Eleven patients who were switched from Octreotide LAR had return of symptomatic control. No significant adverse effects were experienced.

CONCLUSIONS

Prolonged release Lanreotide provides good symptomatic control of diarrhoea and flushing as well as tumour stability in patients with malignant carcinoid syndrome.

Recent trends in the treatment of well-differentiated endocrine carcinoma of the small bowel

Well-differentiated endocrine carcinomas of the small bowel are fairly rare neoplasms that present many clinical challenges. They secrete peptides and neuroamines that may cause carcinoid syndrome. However, many are clinically silent until late presentation with major effects. Initial treatment aims to control carcinoid syndrome with somatostatin analogs. Even if there is metastatic spread, surgical resection of the primitive tumor should be discussed in cases of retractile mesenteritis, small bowel ischemia or subocclusive syndrome in order to avoid any acute complication, in particular at the beginning of somatostatin analog treatment. The choice of treatment depends on the symptoms, general health of the patient, tumor burden, degree of uptake of radionuclide, histological features of the tumor, and tumor growth. Management strategies include surgery for cure (which is rarely achieved) or for cytoreduction, radiological interventions (transarterial embolization or radiofrequency ablation), and chemotherapy (interferon and somatostatin analogs). New biological agent and radionuclide targeted therapies are under investigation. Diffuse and non-evolving lesions should also be simply monitored. Finally, it has to be emphasized that it is of the utmost importance to enroll these patients with a rare disease in prospective clinical trials assessing new therapeutic strategies.