Cerebrospinal fluid concentration of metoprolol in a hypertensive patient

Acute effects of intravenous carvedilol versus metoprolol on baroreflex-mediated sympathetic circulatory regulation in rats

AIMS

To compare the effects of metoprolol and carvedilol on baroreflex-mediated sympathetic circulatory regulation.

METHODS

In anesthetized Wistar-Kyoto rats, carotid sinus baroreceptor regions were isolated. Changes in sympathetic nerve activity (SNA), arterial pressure (AP), heart rate (HR), and aortic flow (AoF) in response to a staircase-wise pressure input were examined before (control) and after intravenous injection of low-dose metoprolol (2 mg/kg), high-dose metoprolol (10 mg/kg), or carvedilol (0.67 mg/kg) (n = 6 each). Peripheral vascular resistance (PVR) was calculated from mean AP divided by mean AoF.

RESULTS

Low-dose metoprolol had limited effect on sympathetic AP regulation compared to control [operating-point AP (drug vs. control): 88.7 ± 7.1 vs. 98.3 ± 3.3 mm Hg, not significant] despite a significant bradycardic effect. Although high-dose metoprolol showed central sympathoinhibition, it increased PVR at a given SNA as a peripheral effect. Consequently, high-dose metoprolol decreased the operating-point AP slightly (96.1 ± 2.7 vs. 101.9 ± 2.7 mm Hg, P < 0.01). Carvedilol showed no significant central sympathoinhibition at the dose examined in this study, but significantly reduced PVR at a given SNA, leading to a marked reduction in the operating-point AP (71.9 ± 8.2 vs. 112.6 ± 7.6 mm Hg, P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Low-dose metoprolol has limited hypotensive effect despite blockade of sympathetic HR regulation. Although high-dose metoprolol induces central sympathoinhibition, it also induces peripheral vasoconstriction that antagonizes the hypotensive effect. In contrast, carvedilol exhibits hypotensive effect mainly through peripheral vasodilation. Although carvedilol is frequently classified as a β-blocker, its vasodilatory effect via α₁-adrenergic blockade plays an important role in AP reduction or heart failure treatment.

Beta-blockers and central nervous system side effects

Beta-adrenergic blocking drugs are a widely used, well tolerated and effective treatment for a variety of cardiovascular and noncardiovascular disorders. Over the years, beta-blockers have been associated with an incidence, albeit low, of CNS side effects. The question of interest, however, is whether the incidence is the same for all members of the class or whether other properties, such as hydrophilicity, have a bearing on the incidence of this type of side effect? This article addresses this question. In pharmacokinetic terms the lipophilic beta-blockers have been shown, both in animals and man, to readily cross the blood-brain barrier in contrast to hydrophilic beta-blockers. This is thought to have possible clinical relevance with respect to the relative incidence of CNS side-effects. To clarify the situation every published clinical paper, in which the beta-blockers propranolol (highly lipophilic, nonselective, no intrinsic sympathomimetic activity (ISA)), pindolol (moderately lipophilic, nonselective, moderate ISA), metoprolol (moderately lipophilic, beta 1-selective, no ISA) and atenolol (hydrophilic beta 1-selective, no ISA) were compared, was assessed for information pertaining to CNS side effects. This comprehensive review of the literature has shown, with few exceptions, that the incidence of CNS side effects such as sleep disturbances, dreaming, nightmares and hallucinations following clinically accepted doses of the four beta-blockers under scrutiny is generally low and that effects on short-term memory are minimal or absent. However, within this group of four drugs the incidence of these side effects is lowest with hydrophilic atenolol and generally highest with pindolol and propranolol. Metoprolol occupies an intermediate position. This order is in agreement with the pharmacokinetic observation that the more hydrophilic the molecule, the less is found in the brain tissue of both animals and man, although in the case of pindolol other factors may be important. The clinical relevance of studies involving psychometric testing is not clear.

Tocainide and metoprolol: an efficacious therapeutic combination in the treatment of premature ventricular beats

A double-blind crossover study was performed in 20 patients to verify the efficacy of tocainide plus metoprolol in patients with premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) class Lown greater than or equal to 2 (mean frequency greater than or equal to 30/h) judged as being "stable" by at least three basal 24-h Holter ECGs with PVC variation of less than +/- 25%. All 20 patients were submitted to a placebo period; and all were subsequently randomized to therapy with tocainide 1800 mg/day or metoprolol 200 mg/day for 15 days and then to tocainide 1800 mg + metoprolol 200 mg/day or tocainide 1200 mg + metoprolol 200 mg/day for 15 days, followed by a crossover of the two combination treatments. At steady state in every stage we controlled for plasma levels of the drugs, a 24-h Holter recording, and a 12-lead ECG. A modified Lown score was evaluated together with the Lown class. Tocainide (mean plasma level 3.3 +/- 0.7 micrograms/ml) was efficacious in 3 of 8 patients, the modified Lown score decreased from 63 +/- 32 (placebo period) to 42 +/- 27 (p less than 0.01) and Lown 4B arrhythmias were abolished in 3 of 4 patients. Metoprolol (mean plasma level 97.4 +/- 89.6 ng/ml) was efficacious in 2 of 10 patients; the modified Lown score and Lown classes did not change significantly. Administration of tocainide 1200 mg + metoprolol 200 mg obtained a positive response in 9 of 12 patients, the modified Lown score decreased significantly compared with placebo (from 53 +/- 31 to 32 +/- 30, p less than 0.01) and Lown 4B arrhythmias were abolished in 2 of 5 cases. Tocainide 1800 mg plus metoprolol 200 mg was scarcely tolerated owing to neurologic and gastroenteric side effects, and only three patients completed this stage with no better antiarrhythmic results compared to the lower dose. In conclusion, the combination of tocainide at 1200 mg and metoprolol 200 mg is well tolerated, efficacious in a high percentage of patients, and superior to single drug therapy in patients with stable PVCs.

Acebutolol. A review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic efficacy in hypertension, angina pectoris and arrhythmia

Acebutolol is a cardioselective beta-adrenoceptor blocking drug possessing both partial agonist (intrinsic sympathomimetic) and membrane stabilising activity. In hypertension, it can be administered once or twice daily with equal effectiveness, and has been as effective at lowering blood pressure as propranolol, diuretics, and other beta-blocking drugs (metoprolol, labetalol and atenolol) and more effective than methyldopa. Acebutolol has a significantly smaller effect on resting heart rate than propranolol, metoprolol and atenolol, although direct comparisons with drugs with intrinsic sympathomimetic activity have yet to be undertaken. In both angina and arrhythmia, when administered twice daily it has been as effective as standard therapeutic agents. The side effect profile of acebutolol appears to be comparable to that of other cardioselective beta-blockers. Its relative cardio-selectivity, partial agonist and membrane stabilising activity, hydrophilicity, and considerable extrarenal excretion may offer advantages over some beta-blocking drugs in specific patients. Choosing a beta-blocking agent, however, should be made with a knowledge of pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties of the various agents and careful consideration of how such properties may be of benefit to an individual patient.

Pharmacologic considerations in determining efficacy of once-daily sotalol administration to hypertensive patients

The beta-adrenergic blocker sotalol, administered only once a day, proved an extremely effective and safe agent for the 24-hour control of essential hypertension, even in patients with a severe form of the disease. Significant (P less than 0.01) decreases from the baseline levels were noted in both supine and standing blood pressures as early as the first week after sotalol administration in the 15 patients who participated in the open study. All patients were titrated and controlled by six to eight weeks or sooner. By the conclusion of the 12-week study, mean supine systolic blood pressure in the 15 patients fell 21 per cent (from 176 mm Hg to 139 mm Hg), and mean supine diastolic blood pressure was down 23 per cent (from 115 mm Hg to 89 mm Hg). Standing values were similarly decreased by sotalol administration at a mean daily dose of 341 mg. Two of the patients also received concomitant 25 mg hydrochlorothiazide per day, and four received 40 mg furosemide per day. A comparison with the pretherapy placebo values indicates that all the declines were highly significant (P less than 0.001). Sotalol was very well tolerated, an no adverse reactions were reported during the entire study. There were also no significant changes in laboratory findings except for a drop in serum cholesterol.

Metoprolol: a review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic efficacy in hypertension and angina pectoris

Metoprolol is a beta1-selective adrenoceptor blocking drug. In hypertension, its duration of effect is longer than expected from its half-life and it is suitable for twice daily administration. There is some evidence that once daily administration may be possible in treating hypertension. It is similar in efficacy to other beta-adrenoceptor blocking drugs in angina pectoris and essential hypertension, when given in equiactive beta-blocking dosages. Metoprolol is well tolerated and side-effects have not proved a problem. It has some pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic differences from other beta-adrenoceptor blocking drugs and may prove useful in cases where these differences are shown to be clinically important.