Mexiletine disposition: individual variation in response to urine acidification and alkalinisation

Complementary and alternative medicine use among individuals participating in research: implications for research and practice

STUDY OBJECTIVES

To determine the frequency and type of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) use among healthy volunteers participating in research, and to investigate the potential for interactions between commonly used CAM modalities and various drugs.

DESIGN

Prospective evaluation.

SETTING

University general clinical research center.

SUBJECTS

Sixty healthy adults participating in an ongoing drug study.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The clinical study database was queried to determine the use and type of existing and newly started CAM throughout the study period. Baseline characteristics were compared between users and nonusers of CAM to identify differences between them. Potential CAM-drug interactions were classified based on curated databases and primary literature sources. Of the 60 subjects enrolled, 30 (50%) used CAM during the study. Of these, 26 (87%) were using CAM at study entry. Baseline CAM users were on average 7 years older than nonusers (p=0.03) and had high-density lipoprotein cholesterol concentrations 10 mg/dl higher than those of nonusers (p=0.04). The group using CAM had more women and nonsmokers than the other group. Several potential CAM-drug interactions were identified.

CONCLUSION

Because of high rates of CAM use (50% of the subjects were using biologically based CAM) and the many potential CAM-drug interactions, CAM use should be rigorously addressed in clinical practice and research. Failure to capture this information may have clinical repercussions through pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interference of clinical response and clinical trial results. Clinicians and researchers may be able to identify those most likely to use CAM by their baseline characteristics; this would help target those patients and research subjects for more thorough assessment and follow-up.

Clinical pharmacokinetics of mexiletine

Mexiletine, a class Ib antiarrhythmic agent, is rapidly and completely absorbed following oral administration with a bioavailability of about 90%. Peak plasma concentrations following oral administration occur within 1 to 4 hours and a linear relationship between dose and plasma concentration is observed in the dose range of 100 to 600 mg. Mexiletine is weakly bound to plasma proteins (70%). Its volume of distribution is large and varies from 5 to 9 L/kg in healthy individuals. Mexiletine is eliminated slowly in humans (with an elimination half-life of 10 hours). It undergoes stereoselective disposition caused by extensive metabolism. Eleven metabolites of mexiletine are presently known, but none of these metabolites possesses any pharmacological activity. The major metabolites are hydroxymethyl-mexiletine, p-hydroxy-mexiletine, m-hydroxy-mexiletine and N-hydroxy-mexiletine. Formation of hydroxymethyl-mexiletine, p-hydroxy-mexiletine and m-hydroxy-mexiletine is genetically determined and cosegregates with polymorphic debrisoquine 4-hydroxylase [cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2D6] activity. On the other hand, CYP1A2 seems to be implicated in the N-oxidation of mexiletine. Various physiological, pathological, pharmacological and environmental factors influence the disposition of mexiletine. Myocardial infarction, opioid analgesics, atropine and antacids slow the rate of absorption, whereas metoclopramide enhances it. Rifampicin (rifampin), phenytoin and cigarette smoking significantly enhance the rate of elimination of mexiletine, whereas ciprofloxacin, propafenone and liver cirrhosis decrease it. Cimetidine, ranitidine, fluconazole and omeprazole do not modify the disposition of mexiletine. Conversely, mexiletine is known to alter the disposition of other drugs, such as caffeine and theophylline. Factors affecting the elimination of mexiletine may be clinically important and dosage adjustments are often necessary.

Mexiletine. A review of its therapeutic use in painful diabetic neuropathy

Mexiletine is an orally active local anaesthetic agent which is structurally related to lidocaine (lignocaine) and has been used for alleviating neuropathic pain of various origins. Mexiletine has been evaluated in several randomised, placebo-controlled trials in patients with painful diabetic neuropathy. The drug decreased mean visual analogue scale (VAS) pain ratings in all studies that used this measure, although in only 2 studies was this effect significantly greater than the often substantial responses seen with placebo. The clinical significance of these decreases is not clear. Statistically significant (vs placebo) reductions in VAS pain ratings were observed in 16 patients receiving mexiletine 10 mg/kg/day for 10 weeks in 1 study and in nocturnal (but not diurnal) pain in 31 patients receiving mexiletine 675 mg/day for 3 weeks in another. Retrospective analysis of another study revealed that mexiletine recipients (225 to 675 mg/day) who described their pain as stabbing, burning or formication on the pain-rating-index-total instrument of the McGill Pain Questionnaire, experienced statistically significant reductions in VAS pain scores after 5 weeks, compared with placebo recipients. Mexiletine generally did not have a significant influence on the quality of sleep in patients with diabetic neuropathy. In Japanese patients, statistically significant reductions in subjective pain ratings were achieved with mexiletine 300 mg/day in 1 study and with 450 mg/day in a further study. In controlled trials, the frequency of adverse events in patients receiving mexiletine for painful diabetic neuropathy ranged from 13.5 to 50%. Gastrointestinal complaints, of which nausea was the most frequent, were the most common adverse events in mexiletine recipients. Central nervous system complaints were uncommon, but included: sleep disturbance, headache, shakiness, dizziness and tiredness. Serious cardiac arrhythmias have not been reported in patients receiving mexiletine for painful diabetic neuropathy; however, transient tachycardia and palpitations have been reported. There are significant differences in the metabolism of mexiletine between people who have cytochrome P450 2D6 [CYP2D6; extensive metabolisers (EMs)] and those who lack this isoenzyme [poor metabolisers (PMs)]. EMs, but not PMs, are susceptible to drug interactions between mexiletine and drugs that inhibit CYP2D6 (e.g. quinidine). Moreover, mexiletine inhibits CYP2D6-mediated metabolism of metoprolol and cytochrome P450 1A2-mediated metabolism of theophylline. Phenytoin and rifampicin (rifampin) induce the metabolism of mexiletine. Clearance of mexiletine is impaired in patients with hepatic, but not renal, dysfunction. Hence, dosage adjustments may be necessary in patients with liver disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) are the agents of choice for painful diabetic neuropathy; however, they are ineffective in approximately 50% of patients and are generally not well tolerated. Mexiletine is an alternative agent for the treatment of painful diabetic neuropathy in patients who have not had a satisfactory response to, or cannot tolerate, TCAs and/or other drugs.

Pharmacokinetics of mexiletine enantiomers in healthy human subjects. A study of the in vivo serum protein binding, salivary excretion and red blood cell distribution of the enantiomers

1. The disposition kinetics of serum free (unbound) and total mexiletine enantiomers were studied in 12 healthy subjects following oral administration of 200 mg racemic mexiletine hydrochloride. The disposition of the enantiomers of mexiletine in urine, saliva, and red blood cells was also examined. 2. The mean peak serum total mexiletine concentration of 217 +/- 69 ng/ml for R(-)-mexiletine was found to be significantly greater than a mean of 197 +/- 56 ng/ml for S(+)-mexiletine. The mean serum total R(-)-mexiletine concentrations were also found to be significantly greater than those for S(+)-mexiletine during the first 6 h following drug administration. The oral absorption, as well as the rapid and the terminal disposition kinetic parameters between the mexiletine enantiomers, were not significantly different. 3. Comparative in vitro serum protein binding of mexiletine enantiomers examined by ultrafiltration and equilibrium dialysis indicated a pH-dependent stereoselective binding of the enantiomers to serum proteins. A serum pH ranging from 6.3 to 9.4 was found to correlate with serum protein binding of the enantiomers from approximately 30-80% respectively. Within the same serum pH range, the serum free drug R(-)/S(+) ratios were found to decrease from 1.0 to 0.7 respectively. At serum pH7.4, a mean serum free fraction of 0.57 +/- 0.7 and 0.56 +/- 0.6 were observed for R(-) and S(+)-mexiletine respectively. 4. The overall mean saliva/serum-free mexiletine enantiomer area under the concentration-time curve ratios of 6.10 +/- 2.82 and 7.49 +/- 3.48 for R(-)- and S(+)-mexiletine respectively were found to be significantly different. The overall mean saliva R(-)/S(+) enantiomer ratio of 0.89 +/- 0.02 (mean +/- SE) over 48 h suggested a stereoselective disposition of the mexiletine enantiomers in saliva. 5. The mean mexiletine red blood cells to serum-free drug concentration ratios among 11 subjects studied were found to range from 0.6 to 1.4 for R(-)-mexiletine and from 0.6 to 1.8 for S(+)-mexiletine. The overall mean ratios of 0.85 +/- 0.06 and 0.84 +/- 0.08 (mean +/- SE) over 48 h for R(-)- and S(+)-mexiletine respectively were both slightly but significantly different from unity. This data together with an overall red blood cell mean R(-)/S(+)-mexiletine concentration ratio of 0.91 +/- 0.13 suggested a non-stereoselective and passive diffusion of the enantiomers into red blood cells. 6. The cumulative amounts of unchanged R(-)- and S(+)-mexiletine in the urine were found to be variable among the 12 subjects with a mean percent urinary recovery of 3.49 +/- 3.35% for R(-)-mexiletine and 3.68 +/- 3.94% for S(+)-mexiletine.

Pharmacokinetics of the antiarrhythmic agent tiracizine: steady state kinetics in comparison with single-dose kinetics

Serum and urine kinetics of unchanged tiracizine (T), a new class I antiarrhythmic agent, and three metabolites (M1, 2, and 3) were assessed in eight healthy extensive metabolizers after a single oral administration of 50 mg tiracizine and during steady state (50 mg b.i.d.). Additionally, tiracizine-induced ECG changes were measured. Considerable accumulation of M1 and M2 was observed during repeated dosing (M1, Cmax,ss = 391.8 ng mL-1 against Cmax,sd = 132.8 ng mL-1; M2, Cmax,ss = 143.2 ng mL-1 against Cmax,sd = 25.8 ng mL-1). However, significant increases of AUC (AUC tau = 261.9 ng h mL-1 against AUC0-infinity,sd = 182.9 ng h mL-1), Cmax (Cmax,ss = 75.9 ng mL-1 against Cmax,sd = 56.9 ng mL-1) and t 1/2 beta (t 1/2 beta,ss = 4.0 h against t 1/2 beta,sd = 2.4 h) of the parent compound indicate non-linear kinetics. The significant decrease in renal clearance of all four substances as well as the decrease of non-renal tiracizine clearance with repeated dosing led to the assumption that non-linearity is due to saturable renal excretion and a fall in intrinsic tiracizine clearance. PQ time was prolonged significantly during steady state and culminated at the tmax of the parent compound, whereas there was no change in any ECG parameter after a single-dose administration of 50 mg tiracizine.

Day-night variations in the renal excretion of the antiarrhythmic agent tiracizine and its metabolites

Daytime and nighttime urinary recovery as well as morning and evening trough serum levels of the antiarrhythmic agent tiracizine and three of its metabolites (M1, M2, and M3) were assessed during a 7-day multiple-dose study period (50 mg tiracizine twice daily) in eight healthy volunteers. A significantly lower mean steady-state urinary recovery was observed during the daytime as compared with during the nighttime (Ae (tot tau d)=42.0 +/- 15.7% vs. Ae (tot tau n)=51.2 +/- 19.6%). This difference is mainly due to a substantial increase of M1 and a smaller increase of M2 urinary recovery by night. Results of additional in vitro investigations showed the ratio of the nonionic/ionic forms of M1 and M2 to be highly dependent on pH in the range of pH 5-pH 7. Therefore, the observed day-night variations might be attributed to alterations of ionization, i.e., nonionic tubular reabsorption of the metabolites due to circadian differences in urinary pH. Trough serum levels of M1 and M2 tended to be higher at 7 P.M. as compared with 7 A.M. Due to the narrow therapeutic index of class I antiarrhythmics, the present results indicate the need for further investigations concerning the effect of urinary pH on the pharmacokinetics of tiracizine and its metabolites.

Mexiletine. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic use in the treatment of arrhythmias

As a member of the class Ib antiarrhythmic drugs mexiletine's primary mechanism of action is blocking fast sodium channels, reducing the phase 0 maximal upstroke velocity of the action potential. It increases the ratio of effective refractory period to action potential duration, but has little effect on conductivity. Unlike quinidine it does not prolong QRS and QT (QTc) intervals. In the dosage range 600 to 900 mg daily mexiletine effectively suppresses premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) in 25% to 79% of patients, with or without underlying cardiac disease. In comparative studies the response rate was comparable to that with quinidine or disopyramide. However, the use of antiarrhythmic therapy in patients with asymptomatic arrhythmias is controversial. More importantly, mexiletine abolishes spontaneous or inducible ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation in the short term in 20% to 50% of patients with refractory arrhythmias. Arrhythmia suppression is maintained in 57% to over 80% of these early therapeutic successes in the long term, with mexiletine alone or in combination with another antiarrhythmic drug. As with other antiarrhythmic drugs, there is no substantial evidence that administration of mexiletine after acute myocardial infarction improves long term prognosis. Although the incidence of adverse effects associated with mexiletine is high, the majority are minor gastrointestinal or neurological effects which can be adequately controlled through dosage adjustment. Furthermore, mexiletine has minimal effects on haemodynamic variables, or on cardiac function in patients with or without pre-existing deterioration of left ventricular function, and it appears to have a low proarrhythmic potential. Thus, while the therapeutic efficacy of mexiletine for the prevention or suppression of symptomatic ventricular arrhythmias may be no greater than that of other antiarrhythmic drugs, and less than that of some (e.g. amiodarone), it is effective in a significant proportion of patients refractory to other treatments and can be administered without causing adverse haemodynamic effects to patients with complicating factors such as acute myocardial infarction or congestive heart failure.

Mexiletine: pharmacology and therapeutic use

Mexiletine is a Class IB antiarrhythmic which has basic and clinical electrophysiologic properties similar to lidocaine. Like other Class I antiarrhythmic agents, mexiletine blocks the rapid inward sodium current responsible for phase 0 of the action potential. It has been noted in the clinical electrophysiology laboratory to have minimal effect on sinus node function and AV nodal and His-Purkinje system conduction. Pharmacokinetic studies have shown that oral absorption is rapid with bioavailability of 80-90%. Mexiletine is predominantly metabolized by the liver with elimination half-life of 9 to 12 hours. The antiarrhythmic effects of the primary drug's metabolites remain to be defined. Hemodynamic studies have shown mexiletine to have a lesser negative inotropic effect than procainamide or disopyramide. Although mexiletine as a single agent successfully suppresses 60 to 80% of spontaneous ventricular arrhythmias, it has lower efficacy in suppression of induced ventricular arrhythmias. Multiple studies have shown that as monotherapy mexiletine is effective in preventing the induction of ventricular tachycardia in approximately 20% of patients. When used in combination with a Class IA antiarrhythmic drug for suppression of induced ventricular arrhythmias, multiple investigators have reported greater efficacy. Neurological side effects (tremor, dizziness, memory loss) occur in approximately 10% of patients while gastrointestinal side effects (nausea, anorexia, gastric irritation) occur in up to 40% of patients. Proarrhythmia or other serious toxicity from the drug is uncommon.

Inhibitory studies of mexiletine and dextromethorphan oxidation in human liver microsomes

The cytochrome P-450dbl isozyme (P-450bdl) is responsible for the genetic sparteine-debrisoquine type polymorphism of drug oxidation in humans. To investigate the relationship between mexiletine oxidation and the activity of this isozyme, cross-inhibition studies were performed in human liver microsomes with mexiletine and dextromethorphan, a prototype substrate for P-450dbl. The formation of hydroxymethylmexiletine and p-hydroxymexiletine, two major mexiletine metabolites, was competitively inhibited by dextromethorphan. Mexiletine competitively inhibited the high affinity component of dextromethorphan O-demethylation. In addition, there was a good agreement between the apparent Km values for the formation of both mexiletine metabolites and the high affinity component of dextromethorphan O-demethylation and their respective apparent Ki values. Several drugs were tested for their ability to inhibit mexiletine oxidation. Quinidine, quinine, propafenone, oxprenolol, propranolol, ajmaline, desipramine, imipramine, chlorpromazine and amitryptiline were competitive inhibitors for the formation of hydroxymethylmexiletine and p-hydroxymexiletine as for prototype reactions of the sparteine-debrisoquine type polymorphism. Amobarbital, valproic acid, ethosuximide, caffeine, theophylline, disopyramide and phenytoin, known to be non-inhibitors of P-450dbl activity, were found not to inhibit the formation of these mexiletine metabolites. Moreover, the formation of both metabolites was strongly inhibited by an antiserum containing anti-liver/kidney microsomes antibodies type I (anti-LKMI) directed against P-450dbl. These data suggest that the formation of two major metabolites of mexiletine is predominantly catalysed by the genetically variable human liver P-450dbl.

Poisoning due to class 1B antiarrhythmic drugs. Lignocaine, mexiletine and tocainide

Since most of the toxicity associated with class 1B antiarrhythmic drugs is dose-related, this review examines adverse effects seen in both therapeutic practice and accidental or premeditated overdose. Toxicity is very common with these agents and can be life-threatening. A high percentage of patients must discontinue therapy because of adverse effects. Mexiletine and tocainide are structural analogues of lignocaine (lidocaine) and toxicity is similar with all 3 drugs. With gradual intoxication (the most common form) central nervous system effects such as lightheadedness, dizziness, drowsiness and confusion are seen first. Seizures and respiratory arrest can occur. Cardiovascular toxicity is manifested by progressive heart block, reduced cardiac contraction, hypotension and asystole. Both mexiletine and tocainide may have proarrhythmic effects. Gastrointestinal toxicity is also common. Shock, hypotension, cardiac failure and beta-blocker therapy reduce lignocaine clearance and enhance the risk of intoxication during routine therapy. Both lignocaine and mexiletine elimination is impaired in severe liver disease while tocainide clearance is reduced in renal failure. Management of toxicity is largely supportive and symptomatic. Lignocaine infusion must be discontinued and decontamination of the gut in the case of oral preparations is recommended. Serious intoxication requires intensive care unit admission. Haemodialysis or haemoperfusion may be helpful in serious lignocaine and tocainide poisoning. In institutions where extracorporeal circulatory assistance is available, massive lignocaine poisoning has been successfully treated with this intervention. In the therapeutic setting serious toxicity can be prevented by close clinical surveillance and appropriate dose reduction in patients with reduced drug clearance. Because of the large interindividual variation in lignocaine pharmacokinetic parameters, therapeutic drug monitoring is recommended if results can be reported quickly. Mexiletine and tocainide have stereoselective metabolism and assays do not distinguish the more active isomers. Therapeutic drug monitoring is less useful in this situation.

Kinetics of oral and intravenous mexiletine: lack of effect of cimetidine and ranitidine

The pharmacokinetics of mexiletine, a Class I antiarrhythmic drug, was investigated in 6 healthy volunteers after single oral doses and 15 min intravenous infusions of 3 mg/kg. Cimetidine and ranitidine are commonly used H2-receptor antagonists, which interact adversely with many drugs, e.g. inhibition of the metabolism of Class I antiarrhythmics such as lidocaine and quinidine by cimetidine. To investigate the effects of the two drugs on the kinetics of mexiletine, cimetidine 800 mg.day-1 or ranitidine 600 mg.day-1 were administered orally for one week. Neither H2-receptor antagonist altered the distribution and elimination of mexiletine, nor did they affect its overall kinetics, or excretion of the metabolites para- and 4-OH-methylmexiletine after oral and intravenous administration of mexiletine.

[Treatment with mexiletine. Clinical and pharmacokinetic studies]

Pharmacokinetics of the antiarrhythmic agent mexiletine were found to be highly variable. Ineffective or toxic doses can be avoided by monitoring mexiletine concentrations in patients plasma. However, the success of antiarrhythmic therapy is mainly determined by the severity of the underlying disease. Therefore, the efficacy of treatment with mexiletine should be controlled by Holter monitoring.

Poisoning by antidysrhythmic drugs

This article discusses the management of antidysrhythmic drug overdoses in children and adolescents.

Mexiletine: a new type I antiarrhythmic agent

Mexiletine is a type I antiarrhythmic drug that is structurally similar to lidocaine. Mexiletine has considerable potential for causing neurologic, cardiac, or gastrointestinal side effects. However, mexiletine does not undergo clinically significant first-pass metabolism and, thus, has good oral bioavailability. Mexiletine has a large and variable volume of distribution and an elimination half-life ranging from 6 to 12 hours. Mexiletine disposition is probably altered in patients with heart failure, liver disease, and severe renal dysfunction. Efficacy and toxicity are not well correlated with mexiletine serum concentrations. Mexiletine is as effective as traditional antiarrhythmics in the treatment of premature ventricular contractions. However, in patients with drug-refractory inducible ventricular tachycardia, mexiletine is usually ineffective when used alone. When mexiletine is combined with other antiarrhythmic agents, a significantly higher percentage of patients with this difficult arrhythmia have a good response. Mexiletine is a potentially important addition to the existing antiarrhythmic drugs currently available, but its place in the clinical setting and in therapeutic drug monitoring is not well defined at this time.

Clinical pharmacokinetics of the newer antiarrhythmic agents

This article reviews clinical pharmacokinetic data on 8 new antiarrhythmic agents. Some of these drugs have been studied extensively while others are relatively new, with incomplete data due to limited evaluation. Amiodarone is a class III antiarrhythmic drug which is effective in treating many atrial and ventricular arrhythmias that are refractory to other drugs. Amiodarone accumulates extensively in tissues and its disposition characteristics are best described by models with 3 and 4 compartments. Its apparent volume of distribution is very large (1300 to 11,000L) and its elimination half-life very long (53 days). A delay of up to 28 days from of treatment to onset of antiarrhythmic effect may be observed, and the antiarrhythmic effect may persist for weeks to months following cessation of therapy. Clinically significant drug interactions have been observed with amiodarone and warfarin, digoxin, quinidine and procainamide. Encainide is a class Ic antiarrhythmic drug. Although it has a short elimination half-life (1 to 3h), 2 major metabolites with antiarrhythmic effects accumulate in the plasma of patients during long term therapy. Plasma concentrations of O-demethyl encainide appear to correlate with the antiarrhythmic effect. Flecainide, another class Ic antiarrhythmic agent, has an elimination half-life of 14 hours which makes it suitable for twice daily dosing. Flecainide elimination is prolonged in patients with low output heart failure. Significant drug interactions with digoxin and cimetidine have been reported. Lorcainide is also a class Ic antiarrhythmic drug, the bioavailability of which is nonlinear. Clearance of the drug is reduced during long term therapy. A major active metabolite, norlorcainide, accumulates in the plasma of patients during long term therapy and its concentration exceeds that of lorcainide by a factor of 2. The elimination half-lives of lorcainide (9h) and norlorcainide (28h) allow for once or twice daily dosing. Mexiletine, a class Ib antiarrhythmic drug, is structurally similar to lignocaine (lidocaine). A sustained release formulation provides effective plasma concentrations when administered twice daily. The apparent volume of distribution of mexiletine is 5.0 to 6.6 L/kg, and the elimination half-life varies from 6 to 12 hours in normal subjects and from 11 to 17 hours in cardiac patients. Mexilitine is extensively metabolised but the metabolites are not pharmacologically active. Renal elimination of mexiletine is pH dependent. Drugs which induce hepatic metabolism significantly alter the pharmacokinetics of mexiletine.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)